Phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin,low‐dose dexamethasone,and lenalidomide in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Our previous phase I/II trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), low‐dose dexamethasone, and lenalidomide in patients with relapsed and refractory myeloma showed an overall response rate of 75%, with 29% achieving ≥ VGPR. Here, we investigated this combination (PLD 30 or 40 mg/m² intravenously, day 1; dexamethasone 40 mg orally, days 1–4; lenalidomide 25 mg orally, days 1–21; administered every 28 days) in a phase II study in patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma to determine its efficacy and tolerability ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00617591). At best response, patients could proceed with high‐dose melphalan or with maintenance lenalidomide and dexamethasone. In 57 patients, we found that the overall response rate and rate of very good partial response and better on intent‐to‐treat, our primary endpoints, were 77.2% and 42.1%, respectively, with responses per the International Myeloma Working Group. Median progression‐free survival was 28 months (95% CI 18.1–34.8), with 1‐ and 2‐year overall survival rates of 98.1 and 79.6%. During induction, grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (49.1%), anemia (15.8%), thrombocytopenia (7%), fatigue (14%), febrile neutropenia (8.8%), and venous thromboembolic events (8.8%). During maintenance, grade 3/4 toxicities were mainly hematologic. We found this combination to be active in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma, with results comparable to other lenalidomide‐based induction strategies without proteasome inhibition. In addition, maintenance therapy with lenalidomide was well tolerated. Am. J. Hematol. 89:62–67, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Lenalidomide, bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a phase 1/2 Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium trial

This phase 1/2 trial evaluated combination lenalidomide, bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (RVDD) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Patients received RVDD at 4 dose levels, including the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Patients with a very good partial response or better (≥ VGPR) after cycle 4 proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation or continued treatment. The primary objectives were MTD evaluation and response to RVDD after 4 and 8 cycles. Seventy-two patients received a median of 4.5 cycles. The MTDs were lenalidomide 25 mg, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2), pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2), and dexamethasone 20/10 mg, as established with 3-week cycles. The most common adverse events were fatigue, constipation, sensory neuropathy, and infection; there was no treatment-related mortality. Response rates after 4 and 8 cycles were 96% and 95% partial response or better, 57% and 65% ≥ VGPR, and 29% and 35% complete or near-complete response, respectively. After a median follow-up of 15.5 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The estimated 18-month PFS and OS were 80.8% and 98.6%, respectively. RVDD was generally well tolerated and highly active, warranting further study in newly diagnosed MM patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00724568.     

Thalidomide-dexamethasone plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin vs. thalidomide-dexamethasone: a case-matched study in advanced multiple myeloma

OBJECTIVES: Nearly all patients with multiple myeloma (MM) relapse or become refractory to front-line therapy. Several salvage therapies have been explored, but the optimal combination regimen has not been defined. We performed a case-matched study comparing patients with relapsed/refractory MM receiving thalidomide-dexamethasone alone or the combination thalidomide-dexamethasone-liposomal pegylated doxorubicin. METHODS: Forty-seven patients received thalidomide (100 mg/d), dexamethasone (40 mg p.o. on days 1-4 and 9-12), and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 28 d) (ThaDD). Their clinical outcome was compared with that of 47 pair mates selected from patients treated at relapse with thalidomide (100 mg/d) and dexamethasone (40 mg p.o. on days 1-4) (Thal-Dex) and matched for age, beta2-microglobulin and previous therapy. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Overall response rate was significantly higher in ThaDD group (92% vs. 63.5%; P < 0.0001) as partial response rate (> or =PR) (75.5% vs. 59.5%; P = 0.077), very good partial response rate (> or =VGPR) (36% vs. 15%; P = 0.018) and near complete remission rate (> or =nCR) (30% vs. 10.5%; P = 0.002). Non-hematologic toxicity was similar in the two groups of patients whereas hematologic toxicity and infections were significantly higher in ThaDD patients. Median progression-free survival, event-free survival, and overall survival were significantly longer in patients receiving ThaDD than in those treated with Thal-Dex. ThaDD regimen significantly improved response rate and overall survival in comparison with Thal-Dex. Although the frequency of hematologic toxicity and infections resulted higher in ThaDD group compared with control group, they were not particularly frequent after adequate prophylaxis was added and were easily managed when occurred.     

Low-dose thalidomide with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a prospective, multicenter, phase II study

The aim of this prospective, multicenter, phase II study was to investigate the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) 40 mg/m2 on day 1 every 28 days, dexamethasone 40 mg p.o. on days 1-4 and 9-12 and thalidomide 100 mg daily in 50 patients with advanced multiple myeloma. Twenty-six percent of patients achieved a complete response, 6% a near complete response, 6% a very good partial response, 38% a partial response, 16% a minor response and 8% progressed, for an overall response rate of 92%. The median event-free survival was 17 months and the median overall survival was not reached. Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity occurred in 12% of patients, thromboembolic disease in 12% and severe infection in 16%. The combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, dexamethasone an thalidomide is safe and very effective in advanced multiple myeloma.     

Thalidomide-dexamethasone versus Interferon-alpha-dexamethasone as maintenance treatment after ThaDD induction for multiple myeloma: a prospective, multicentre, randomised study

Maintenance therapy was explored in multiple myeloma (MM) patients after conventional thalidomide, dexamethasone and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (ThaDD). Patients with newly or relapsed MM obtaining at least minor response after 6 ThaDD courses, were randomised to receive α-interferon (IFN) 3 MU 3 times a week or thalidomide 100 mg daily until relapse. Both groups also received pulsed dexamethasone 20 mg 4 d a month. Fifty-one patients were randomized in the IFN-dexamethasone (ID) arm and 52 in the thalidomide-dexamethasone (TD) arm. The characteristics of two groups were similar. A significantly better 2-years progression-free survival (PFS; 63% vs. 32%; P  = 0·024) and overall survival (84% vs. 68%; P  = 0·030) was observed in the thalidomide arm. In high-risk patients and in those achieving less than very good partial response after induction, TD fared better in term of PFS. Main side effects were peripheral neuropathy and constipation in TD group, fatigue, anorexia and haematological toxicity in ID arm. There was a 21% probability of discontinuation at 3 years in the thalidomide arm and 44% in the IFN arm ( P  = 0·014). Low-dose thalidomide plus pulsed low-dose dexamethasone after conventional thalidomide combination-based therapy was also feasible in the long term, enabling significantly better residual disease control if compared with a standard maintenance therapy.     

An open‐label phase I/II study of cyclophosphamide,bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin,and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed myeloma

We conducted a phase 1/2 trial evaluating the combination of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (CVDD) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). The primary objective of the phase 1 was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of maximum planned dose (MPD) and the phase 2 was to assess the overall response rate. Patients received 6–8 cycles of CVDD at four dose levels. There were no dose‐limiting toxicities. The MPD was cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m² IV on day 1, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² IV on days 1, 4, 8, 11, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m² IV on day 4, and dexamethasone 20 mg orally on the day of and after bortezomib (21‐d cycle). Forty‐nine patients were treated at the MPD of which 22% had high‐risk myeloma. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities included myelosuppression, infection, and fatigue. Overall response and complete response rates were 91% and 26% in standard‐risk, and 100% and 58% in high‐risk cohort, respectively. After a median follow‐up of 34 months, the median progression‐free survival was 31.3 months. The 2‐yr overall survival was 91.1% in the standard‐risk and 88.9% in the high‐risk cohort, respectively. CVDD regimen was well tolerated and was highly active in newly diagnosed MM.     

DVd(T)方案治疗多发性骨髓瘤17例临床疗效分析

目的:观察脂质体阿霉素(PLD)联合长春新碱(VCR)、地塞米松(Dex)士沙利度胺(Thal)治疗多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的疗效及毒副反应.方法:17例初治或复发难治MM患者接受DVd(PLD 40 mg·m-2d1、VCR 2 mg d1、Dex 40 mg d1～4)或DVdT(PLD及VCR用法用量同上,Dex:40 mg,d1～4、d9～12;Thal:100 mg,d1～21)治疗,按照EBMT标准评价疗效、WHO标准判断毒副反应.结果:①17例患者共完成了34个周期的治疗,总有效率(ORR=CR+nCR+VGPR+PR)为58.8%,与国外文献报道接近,与历史上我院采用的VAD及其类似方案相比疗效也接近.②采用DVd方案治疗的11例患者的ORR为4/11(36.4%).其中6例初治患者的ORR为2/6(33.3%).采用DVdT方案化疗的6例患者均为初治病例,其ORR为6/6(100%).对于初治患者.DVdT方案的ORR显著好于DVd方案.③多数治疗相关毒副反应为1～2级且可耐受.17例患者中有13例在接受DVd(T)化疗前心电图或心脏B超示不同程度的心律失常或左室舒张功能降低,但均未因化疗增加心脏毒性.DVd组与DVdT组的毒副反应接近.结论:DVd方案具有较好的耐受性,适当延长Dex用量并加入Thal可以在不增加化疗相关毒性的同时显著提高DVd方案疗效.     

A phase 2 safety study of accelerated elotuzumab infusion,over less than 1 h,in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone,in patients with multiple myeloma

Elotuzumab, an immunostimulatory SLAMF7‐targeting monoclonal antibody, induces myeloma cell death with minimal effects on normal tissue. In a previous phase 3 study in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), elotuzumab (10 mg/kg, ～3‐h infusion), combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, demonstrated durable efficacy and acceptable safety; 10% (33/321) of patients had infusion reactions (IRs; Grade 1/2: 29; Grade 3: 4). This phase 2 study (NCT02159365) investigated an accelerated infusion schedule in 70 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma or RRMM. The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of Grade 3/4 IRs by completion of treatment Cycle 2. Dosing comprised elotuzumab 10 mg/kg intravenously (weekly, Cycles 1‐2; biweekly, Cycles 3+), lenalidomide 25 mg (daily, Days 1‐21), and dexamethasone (28 mg orally and 8 mg intravenously, weekly, Cycles 1‐2; 40 mg orally, weekly, Cycles 3+), in 28‐day cycles. Premedication with diphenhydramine, acetaminophen, and ranitidine (or their equivalents) was given as in previous studies. If no IRs occurred, infusion rate was increased in Cycle 1 from 0.5 to 2 mL/min during dose 1 (～2 h 50 min duration) to 5 mL/min for the entire infusion by dose 3 and also during all subsequent infusions (～1‐h duration). Median number of treatment cycles was six. No Grade 3/4 IRs occurred; only one Grade 1 and one Grade 2 IR occurred, both during the first infusion. These data support the safety of a faster infusion of elotuzumab administered over ～1 h by the third dose, providing a more convenient alternative dosing option for patients.     

A randomized study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus continuous-infusion doxorubicin in elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the GRAALL-SA1 study

Background

The prognosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the elderly is poor. The GRAALL-SA1 phase II, randomized trial compared the efficacy and toxicity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus continuous-infusion doxorubicin in patients 55 years or older with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Design and Methods

Sixty patients received either continuous-infusion doxorubicin (12 mg/m²/day) and continuous-infusion vincristine (0.4 mg/day) on days 1–4 or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m²) and standard vincristine (2 mg) on day 1, accompanied by dexamethasone, followed at day 28 by a second cycle, reinforced by cyclophosphamide. End-points were safety, outcome and prognostic factors.

Results

Myelosuppression was reduced in the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin arm with shorter severe neutropenia (P=0.05), shorter severe thrombocytopenia (P=0.03), and fewer red blood cell transfusions (P=0.04). Grade 3/4 infections and Gram-negative bacteremia were reduced in the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin arm (P=0.04 and P=0.02, respectively). There was a trend towards fewer cardiac events among the patients who received pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (1/29 versus 6/31). The complete remission rate was 82% and, with a median follow-up of 4 years, median event-free survival and overall survival were 9 and 10 months, respectively. Despite the better tolerance of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, no differences in survival were observed between the two arms, due to trends towards more induction refractoriness (17 versus 3%, P=0.10) and a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (52% versus 32% at 2 years, P=0.20) in the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin arm.

Conclusions

With the drug schedules used in this study, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin did not improve the outcome of elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia despite reduced toxicities.     

Administration of a modified chemotherapeutic regimen containing vincristine, liposomal doxorubicin and dexamethasone to multiple myeloma patients: preliminary data

For elderly patients with multiple myeloma (MM), conventional melphalan and prednisone (MP) therapy has been the treatment of choice; the vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) regimen is preferred for younger patients who also receive high-dose melphalan in combination with autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Although survival time is similar in both the MP and VAD regimens, the continuous infusion of doxorubicin which the latter treatment entails constitutes a disadvantage along with the 4-day hospitalization required. Doxorubicin also induces cardiotoxicity, particularly in the elderly. A modified form of VAD therapy includes liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) (40 mg/m2 for 1 d) [corrected], oncovin (2 mg for 1 d) and dexamethasone 40 mg for 4 d per os. Doxorubicin encapsulated with liposomes has less cardiotoxicity, is more efficient and has fewer side effects than conventional doxorubicin, and it can be administered on an outpatient basis: dexamethasone can be given orally and vincristine in bolus infusion. In order to estimate its efficacy and tolerability, we administered this regimen to 12 patients (first-line treatment in 6 patients, salvage therapy in 6 patients). All patients exhibited good tolerance to liposomal doxorubicin with no severe side effects. Eight patients achieved complete hematological remission and three partial response. One patient died before completing the treatment. In conclusion, compared to other therapies, this modified VAD regimen containing liposomal doxorubicin can be more easily administered to MM patients, without severe side effects and with increased full remission rates, almost similar to those with the conventional VAD treatment.     

Once-Weekly 1.6 mg/m<Superscript>2</Superscript> Bortezomib BCD Regimen in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who are Unfit for Standard Dose Chemotherapy

Bortezomib has shown anti-myeloma effects in combination with alkylating agents, but clinical benefits can be limited by neurotoxicity. There is less information on the efficacy and tolerability of once-weekly 1.6 mg/m² bortezomib combined with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (BCD) regimen in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are unfit for standard dose chemotherapy. Here, we report our experience of weekly 1.6 mg/m² intravenous bortezomib in this group of patients. Between March 2010 and February 2015, we treated 34 newly diagnosed elderly patients with the combination of bortezomib 1.6 mg/m² intravenously on days 1 and 8; cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m² intravenously on days 1–4; dexamethasone 20 mg intravenously on days 1–4, and 8–11. Among the 34 patients, 14 (41 %) responded with complete response (CR), 6 (18 %) with very good partial response (VGPR) and 10 (29 %) with partial response (PR). The overall response rates were 88 %. After 2 cycles of treatments, the survival of patients who attained a response of VGPR or CR was significantly longer than those with PR or resistance to BCD, for both progression-free survival (PFS) (21.4 vs. 10.6 months, p = 0.002) and overall survival (OS) (23.0 vs. 16.8 months, p = 0.043). The 2-year PFS and OS were 26.5 and 64.7 % respectively in these elderly multiple myeloma patients in our study. Grade 1/2 neuropathy was observed in 20 % of the cycles while grade 3/4 neuropathy was not observed. No patients withdrew due to neuropathy or other side effects. Once-weekly bortezomib at 1.6 mg/m² BCD regimen is both effective and safe in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are unfit for standard dose chemotherapy.     

Phase II study of carfilzomib and dexamethasone therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) has significant activity in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Kd has not previously been evaluated in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We report a single-arm phase 2 study of 72 patients with NDMM to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Kd induction. Carfilzomib was administered in two dosing cohorts with dosing of 20/45 mg/m² in the first 25 patients and 20/56 mg/m² in the subsequent 47 patients. Carfilzomib was administered on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 of a 28-day cycle, dexamethasone 20 mg was administered orally on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 and 23. Treatment was continued to maximum response, progression of disease, or regimen intolerability. Endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), regimen toxicity and impact of carfilzomib on CD34+ stem cell collection yield. Sixty-five pts achieved at least a partial response (PR) for an ORR of 90%. The maximum response achieved was complete response or better in 5 (7%), very good partial response (VGPR) in 42 (58%), PR in 18 (25%) and stable disease in 7 pts (10%). Toxicities were predominantly low grade with 547 grade 1/2 adverse events and 44 grade ≥3 events. The rate of grade ≥3 cardiovascular adverse events was 11.1% with eight observed events. The activity of Kd described represents the highest rate of overall response and ≥VGPR for any 2-agent combination in NDMM reported to date. Kd demonstrated a safety profile consistent with previously reported carfilzomib studies.     

PAD方案治疗初治多发性骨髓瘤的疗效研究

目的:观察硼替佐米联合脂质体多柔比星及地塞米松(PAD)方案治疗初治多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的疗效和不良反应。方法:初治MM患者19例,其中男11例,女8例,中位年龄66(43～77)岁。均给予PAD方案为一线治疗:硼替佐米1.3mg/m2,静脉注射,第1、4、8、11天;脂质体多柔比星20mg,静脉滴注,第1、4、8天;地塞米松20mg/d,静脉滴注,第1、4、8、11天,每4周为一个周期。采用国际骨髓瘤工作组(IMWG)标准观察疗效,并按国际肿瘤组织毒副作用统一命名法的标准(NCICTCAE)(第3版)判断不良反应。结果:平均(3.9±1.1)(2～6)个疗程后的疗效观察,总有效率为89%,其中完全缓解(CR)8例(42%),非常好的部分缓解(VGPR)2例(11%),部分缓解(PR)6例(31%),轻微反应(MR)1例(5%),疾病稳定(SD)2例(11%)。可见初始疗效的中位时间为2.8(1～5)周,最佳疗效的中位时间为2.7(1～4)个月。骨髓瘤细胞、血清单克隆蛋白量、红细胞沉降率均较治疗前下降。中位随访期19(6～35)个月,所有患者目前均生存。最常见的不良反应为胃肠道症状,其中便秘7例(37%),腹泻1例(5%),恶心2例(11%),黏膜炎1例(5%)。其次为血液学改变,中性粒细胞减少6例(32%),贫血3例(16%),血小板减少5例(26%)。另外,周围神经病变(PN)较为多见,1～2级4例(21%),3级1例(5%)。3例(16%)患者出现手足综合征,3例(16%)患者出现乏力。结论:PAD方案治疗初治MM疗效明确,不良反应较少。     

Combination of bortezomib,thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTD) as a consolidation therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation for symptomatic multiple myeloma in Japanese patients

Consolidation therapy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has been widely adopted to improve treatment response following autologous stem cell transplantation. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the safety and efficacy of combination regimen of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTD) as consolidation therapy in 24 Japanese patients with newly diagnosed MM. VTD consisted of bortezomib at a dose of 1.3 mg/m² and dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg/day on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 35-day cycle, with daily oral thalidomide at a dose of 100 mg/day. Grade 3–4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were documented in four and three patients (17 and 13 %), respectively, but drug dose reduction due to cytopenia was not required in any case. Peripheral neuropathy was common (63 %), but severe grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy was not observed. Very good partial response or better response (≥VGPR) rates before and after consolidation therapy were 54 and 79 %, respectively. Patients had a significant probability of improving from p = 0.041). The VTD regimen may be safe and effective as a consolidation therapy in the treatment of MM in Japanese population.     

Phase 2 trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in advanced endometrial cancer

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced endometrial cancer.Methods Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was administered at a dose of 40 mg/m², and repeated on an every 28-day schedule.Results A total of 19 patients were enrolled in this phase 2 trial. Fourteen patients had received prior chemotherapy (carboplatin/paclitaxel-9; cisplatin/paclitaxel-3; single agent paclitaxel-2), seven prior radiation therapy, and three prior hormonal therapy. No patients had previously received doxorubicin. Two patients (11%) developed grade 1 hand-foot syndrome following treatment with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin. There were no episodes of cardiac dysfunction (>10% reduction in baseline ejection fraction). Three patients required hospitalization for nausea, vomiting, anemia, and dehydration. Only 2 (11%) patients required dose reduction. Four of 19 patients (21%; 95% CI: 3–39%) evaluable for response exhibited objective and subjective evidence of an antineoplastic effect of therapy (duration of responses: 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, 6+ months).Conclusion The pegylated liposomal doxorubicin regimen employed in this trial exhibited an acceptable toxicity profile (cardiac dysfunction, hand-foot syndrome). Definite, although modest, antineoplastic activity in a patient population with recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer was documented.     

Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in myeloma refractory to both bortezomib and lenalidomide: comparison of 2 dosing strategies in dual-refractory disease

Pomalidomide at doses of 2 or 4 mg/d has demonstrated excellent activity in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). We opened 2 sequential phase 2 trials using the pomalidomide with weekly dexamethasone (Pom/dex) regimen at differing doses to study the efficacy of this regimen in patients who have failed both lenalidomide and bortezomib. Pomalidomide was given orally 2 or 4 mg daily with dexamethasone 40 mg weekly. Thirty-five patients were enrolled in each cohort. Confirmed responses in the 2-mg cohort consisted of very good partial response (VGPR) in 5 (14%), partial response (PR) in 4 (11%), minor response (MR) in 8 (23%) for an overall response rate of 49%. In the 4-mg cohort, confirmed responses consisted of complete response (CR) in 1 (3%), VGPR in 3 (9%), PR in 6 (17%), MR in 5 (14%) for an overall response rate of 43%. Overall survival at 6 months is 78% and 67% in the 2- and 4-mg cohort, respectively. Myelosuppression was the most common toxicity. This nonrandomized data suggests no advantage for 4 mg over the 2 mg daily. Pomalidomide overcomes resistance in myeloma refractory to both lenalidomide and bortezomib. This trial is registered at http://ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00558896.     

Daratumumab,bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma: LYRA study

This United States community study evaluated the combination of daratumumab, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (D-VCd) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) and relapsed multiple myeloma (RMM). Patients received 4–8 induction cycles of bortezomib 1·5 mg/m², cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m² and dexamethasone 40 mg weekly. Intravenous daratumumab 16 mg/kg was administered as approved except for a split-first dose in Cycle 1. Eligible patients underwent autologous stem cell transplantation. All patients received ≤12 daratumumab maintenance doses monthly. Eighty-six NDMM and 14 RMM patients received ≥1 treatment dose. In NDMM patients, very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) and overall response rates after 4 induction cycles were 44% (primary endpoint) and 79%, respectively, and 56% and 81% at end of induction. The 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 87%. Efficacy was also observed in RMM patients. Fatigue (59%) and neutropenia (13%) were the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and grade 3/4 TEAE, respectively. Infusion reactions occurred in 54% of patients, primarily during the first dose, and were mild (2% grade 3). The first 2 daratumumab infusions were 4·5 and 3·8 h (median). Overall, D-VCd was well tolerated, split-first daratumumab dosing was feasible, the ≥VGPR rate after 4 cycles was 44% and the 1-year PFS rate was 87%.     

A modified regimen of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, bortezomib and dexamethasone (DVD) is effective and well tolerated for previously untreated multiple myeloma patients

The combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), bortezomib and dexamethasone has shown efficacy in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Our earlier retrospective study suggested that modification of the doses, schedules and route of administration of these drugs appears to reduce toxicity without compromising anti‐MM activity. As a result, we evaluated this modified drug combination in the frontline setting in a prospective multicentre phase II trial. Thirty‐five previously untreated MM patients were enrolled. Dexamethasone IV 40 mg, bortezomib 1 mg/m² and PLD 5 mg/m² were administered on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 4‐week cycle. Patients were treated to their maximum response plus two additional cycles. The treatment regimen was discontinued after a maximum of eight cycles. Our modified schedule and dosing regimen achieved a high overall response rate of 86%, while showing a marked decrease in the incidence and severity of peripheral neuropathy, palmar‐plantar erythrodysesthesia and myelosuppression compared to the standard dosing on a 3‐week cycle using these drugs. This modified regimen of dexamethasone, bortezomib and PLD shows improved tolerability and safety while maintaining a high response rate when compared to standard treatment with these agents in the frontline setting.     

Mature results of MM‐011: A phase I/II trial of liposomal doxorubicin,vincristine, dexamethasone,and lenalidomide combination therapy followed by lenalidomide maintenance for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

A previous interim report of MM‐011, the first study that combined lenalidomide with anthracycline‐based chemotherapy followed by lenalidomide maintenance for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), showed promising safety and activity. We report the long‐term outcomes of all 76 treated patients with follow‐up ≥5 years. This single‐center phase I/II study administered lenalidomide (10 mg on days 1–21 of every 28‐day cycle), intravenous liposomal doxorubicin (40 mg/m² on day 1), dexamethasone (40 mg on days 1–4), and intravenous vincristine (2 mg on day 1). After 4–6 planned induction cycles, lenalidomide maintenance therapy was given at the last tolerated dose until progression, with or without 50 mg prednisone every other day. The median number of previous therapies was 3 (range, 1–7); 49 (64.5%) patients had refractory disease. Forty‐three (56.6%) patients received maintenance therapy. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred during induction and maintenance therapy in 48.7% and 25.6% of patients, respectively. Four (5.3%) treatment‐related deaths occurred during induction. Responses were seen in 53.0% (at least partial response) and 71.2% (at least minor response) of patients. Overall, median progression‐free survival and overall survival were 10.5 and 19.0 months, respectively; in patients with refractory disease these values were 7.5 and 11.3 months, respectively. Lenalidomide with anthracycline‐based chemotherapy followed by maintenance lenalidomide provided durable control in patients with RRMM ( ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00091624). Am. J. Hematol. 89:349–354, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Thalidomide, dexamethasone, Doxil and Velcade (ThaDD-V) followed by consolidation/maintenance therapy in patients with relapsed�Crefractory multiple myeloma

In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), three/four-drug combinations as induction therapy seem to be more effective compared with two-drug associations in terms of response rate and duration of remission. Moreover, there is an emergent body of evidences that consolidation/maintenance therapy improves the quality of response and remission duration. However, the impact of these strategies in relapsed/refractory MM (r-rMM) is still unknown. This phase II study explored the four-drug combination of thalidomide, dexamethasone, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (pLD), and bortezomib (ThaDD-V) as induction followed by consolidation therapy based on bortezomib-dexamethasone and thalidomide-dexamethasone and maintenance therapy with thalidomide in r-rMM patients. The primary end points of this study were best response and toxicity of the planned therapy. Forty-six patients were enrolled. At the end of therapy, the best response was as follows: 37% complete response (CR), 34.5% VGPR, and 4.5% PR with an ORR of 76%. Patients receiving ≤ 2 prior regimens had a CR rate significantly higher than those heavily treated (41% vs 0%; p=0.010). With a median follow-up of 31 months, median time to progression (TTP) and OS were 18.5 months and 40 months, respectively. By a 6-month landmark analysis, patients who completed the protocol had a significantly longer TTP compared with those who did not because of toxicity (not reached vs 7 months; p<0.0001). After the dose intensity of bortezomib was reduced due to an excess of peripheral neuropathy (PN), grade 3 PN occurred in 7.5% of patients. ThaDD-V followed by consolidation-maintenance therapy seems to be very effective in patients with r-rMM provided that this procedure is used early on relapse when very deep responses seem to be the rule.