An assessment of the new "SCORE" index as a predictor of osteoporosis in women

BACKGROUND: The study was done to determine whether the new SCORE (Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation) index might reduce the utilization of bone mineral density (BMD) measurement. METHODS: 989 consecutive patients who were referred by a range of physicians for BMD assessments at one of two clinics had a SCORE index constructed. Approximately 95% of the subjects were Caucasian. The index is based on only 6 factors: age, previous fractures, rheumatoid arthritis, estrogen use, weight, and race. RESULTS: All but 1 (0.1%) of those with a femoral neck BMD T-score of < -2.5 had an abnormal SCORE index. However, its specificity was relatively low, since two thirds of those individuals also with an abnormal index had a T-score of > -2.5. One percent false negatives were also seen in the lumbar spine. CONCLUSION: The SCORE index correctly predicted those individuals who did not have an osteoporotic T-score. It was of the most value in the < 60 age group. DISCUSSION: The precise role of BMD measurement in the assessment and management of individuals possibly at risk for osteoporosis remains controversial. Our results suggest that the prior use of the SCORE index by the referring physicians to screen the patients sent for BMD measurement would have allowed them to exclude over 20% of the patients referred for assessment, and therefore reduce the need and cost of BMD measurement. The proportion of individuals who had a normal SCORE index, and would have been screened out, was 43% in the under 60 year age group, but in the 65 and over age group it provided no additional information to help with, for example, the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) guidelines.     

Osteoporosis in pulmonary clinic patients: does point-of-care screening predict central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry?

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Patients in a pulmonary clinic have disorders that predispose them to osteoporosis and may use glucocorticoid therapy, which has been associated with low bone mineral density (BMD) and increased fracture risk. Ideally, all patients at risk for osteoporosis would be screened using the best test available, which is central BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We proposed to stratify the risk for osteoporosis by the use of a simple questionnaire and point-of-care heel ultrasound BMD measurements. DESIGN: Cross-sectional screening study. SETTING: Pulmonary clinic in a single Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PATIENTS: Approximately 200 male and female patients who had not had previous BMD testing were eligible for the study, and 107 gave consent. INTERVENTIONS: One hundred seven men (white, 71 men; black, 35 men; and Asian, 1 man) underwent heel BMD testing and filled out a questionnaire. Ninety-eight men underwent a central DXA. RESULTS: Of 98 subjects, 24.5% had a spine, total hip, or femoral neck (FN) T-score of or= 7 days, and race, which accounted for 52 to 57% of the variance. When a heel ultrasound T-score of -1.0 was tested to predict a central DXA T-score of -2.0, the sensitivity was 61% and the specificity 64%. Adding the questionnaire score and body mass index (BMI) to the heel T-score improved sensitivity but not specificity. Moreover, BMI and age predicted central BMD with similar sensitivity and specificity. Importantly, of 24 patients with a central DXA T-score of 相似文献   

Effect of low dose methotrexate on bone density in women with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a multicenter cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the influence of low dose methotrexate (MTX) on bone using data from a large multicenter, cross-sectional study on bone mineral density (BMD) in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We selected 731 female patients with RA divided into 2 groups on the basis of MTX use: never MTX users (n = 485) and MTX users for at least 6 months (n = 246). Demographic, disease, and treatment related variables were collected for each patient. BMD was measured at lumbar spine and proximal femur by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Osteoporosis was defined as BMD < -2.5 T-score. RESULTS: The frequency of osteoporosis among never MTX users and MTX users was 29.1% and 28.3% (p = NS) for lumbar spine, and 34.8% and 37.8% (p = NS) for femoral neck, respectively. Mean T-score values at lumbar spine and femoral neck were comparable in the 2 groups, even after adjusting for age, menopausal status, body mass index (BMI), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score, and steroid use. The generalized linear model showed that age, menopause, BMI, HAQ score, and steroid use were significant independent predictors of BMD at lumbar or at femoral level, whereas MTX use was not. Logistic procedure showed that only age, HAQ score, and BMI were significantly associated with the risk of osteoporosis. CONCLUSION: We found no negative effect of low dose MTX on BMD in women with RA.     

Vertebral fracture risk reduction with risedronate in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The effect of risedronate, a potent pyridinyl bisphosphonate, on vertebral fractures in post-menopausal women was evaluated in randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. These trials included two large vertebral fracture studies that used time-to-event methods to evaluate the effects of treatment on fracture risk, thereby allowing both the occurrence and the timing of fractures to be considered. METHODS: We used individual patient data (IPD) and time-to-event methods to perform a meta-analysis of the anti-fracture efficacy of risedronate (2.5 or 5 mg daily) in osteoporotic women enrolled in five double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Women were included in the analysis if, at baseline, they had either at least one prevalent vertebral fracture or a femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) T-score of less than -2.5, were at least 1 year post-menopausal, and had had vertebral fracture assessments (N = 3331). RESULTS: Risedronate 5 mg daily reduced the risk of radiographically defined vertebral fracture by 64% (95% CI, 46 to 76%, p < 0.001) in the first year of treatment and 45% (95% CI, 31 to 57%, p < 0.001) in 3 years. The numbers of patients who needed to be treated with risedronate 5 mg to prevent one new vertebral fracture over 1 and 3 years were 21 and 13, respectively. Comparable findings were observed in sub-populations defined on the basis of either prevalent vertebral fracture without regard to femoral neck BMD, or femoral neck BMD without regard to vertebral fracture status. Risedronate significantly reduced the incidence of clinical (symptomatic) vertebral fractures in the first 6 months of treatment (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis, based upon five trials and using IPD and time-to-event statistical methods, provides a more precise estimate of the effect of risedronate in reducing vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporotic women than a meta-analysis using summary statistics from the literature.     

Assessment of non-vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND: Non-vertebral (NV) fractures are responsible for a great amount of morbidity, mortality and cost attributable to osteoporosis. OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for NV fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, and to design an assessment tool for prediction of these fractures. METHODS: 2546 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis included in the placebo groups of three risedronate controlled trials were included (mean age 72 years, mean femoral T-score -2.5; 60% and 53% of patients with prevalent vertebral and NV fractures, respectively). Over 3 years, 222 NV fractures were observed. Baseline data on 14 risk factors were included in a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: 6 risk factors were associated with NV fracture risk: prevalent NV fracture (p = 0.004), number of prevalent vertebral fractures (p<0.001), femoral T-score (p = 0.031), serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (p<0.001), age (p = 0.012) and height (p = 0.037). An NV risk index was developed by converting the multivariate logistic equation into an additive score. In the group of women with a score > or =2.1, the incidence of NV fracture was 13.2% (95% CI 11.1 to 15.3), 1.5 times higher than that of the general population. CONCLUSIONS: The NV risk index is a convenient tool for selection of patients with osteoporosis with a high risk for NV fractures, and may help to choose from available treatments those with a proven efficacy for reduction of NV fracture risk.     

Influence of body composition on bone mass in postmenopausal osteoporotic women

We aimed at evaluating the relationship of lean and fat mass to bone mass in osteoporotic postmenopausal women. We invited 65 women who were being treated at the São Paulo Hospital osteoporosis outpatients’ clinic to participate. Body composition and bone mineral density (BMD) measurements were performed using Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry methodology (DXA). The mean age and weight were 69.7 ± 6.4 years and 56.3 ± 7.6 kg, respectively. Accordingly to the body mass index (BMI), 52.8% were of normal weight and 47.1% of the patients were overweight. Overweight women had significantly higher bone mass. Similarly, skeletal muscle index (SMI) showed a positive effect on BMD measurements and women with sarcopenia had significantly lower BMD measurements in total femur and femoral neck. In multiple regression analysis only lean mass and age, after adjustments to fat mass and BMI, were able to predict total body bone mineral content (BMC) (R² = 28%). Also lean mass adjusted to age and BMI were able to predict femoral neck BMD (R² = 14%). On the other hand, none of the components of the body composition (lean mass or fat mass) contributed significantly to explaining total femur BMD and neither body composition measurements were associated with spine BMD. These findings suggest that lean mass has a relevant role in BMC and BMD measurements. In addition, lower BMI and lean mass loss (sarcopenia) is associated to lower BMC and BMD of femoral neck and total femur and possible higher risk of osteoporotic fracture.     

Prevalence and predictors of fragility fractures in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE: To establish the prevalence of reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures, and risk factors for fractures, in a cross sectional study of a large cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: All SLE patients willing to take part in the study had bone densitometry in 1999/2000 and completed a questionnaire on risk factors for osteoporosis and on drugs used. Accumulated damage was scored using the SLICC/ACR damage index (SDI). Only fractures occurring since the onset of SLE and unrelated to trauma were included, and the SDI score was modified to exclude osteoporotic fractures. Statistical analysis was by chi(2) test, Fisher's exact test, and binary logistic regression. RESULTS: 242 patients were studied, median age 39.9 years (range 18 to 80), median disease duration 7.0 years (range 0 to 42). Of these, 123 (50.8%) had reduced BMD (T score <-1.0) and 25 (10.3%) were in the osteoporotic range (T score <-2.5). Fragility fractures had occurred in 22 patients (9.1%) since diagnosis of SLE. Of these, two (9.1%) had normal BMD and 20 (90.9%) had reduced BMD, while seven (31.8%) were within the osteoporotic range. Non-Afro-Caribbean race and exposure to prednisolone >10 mg daily were significantly associated with reduced BMD, while age and menopause were associated with osteoporosis. The risk factors for fractures were reduced BMD and age. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced BMD, osteoporosis, and fragility fractures appear to be prevalent in patients with SLE. Steroids were not an independent risk factor for fractures, although their effect could be mediated through reduced bone mineral density.     

Antiresorptive Therapy for the Prevention of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a condition associated with decreased bone strength and an increased fracture risk. It may be defined based on bone mineral density (BMD) with a T-score at the hip or spine of less than -2.5 standard deviations in young healthy individuals or from an osteoporotic fracture (i.e. a fracture occurring after low-energy trauma or no apparent trauma). Risk factors predisposing to fractures include: increasing age; female gender; low BMD; a prior fragility fracture; a family history of fragility fractures; low bodyweight; lack of estrogen in women (i.e. post menopause); corticosteroid use; smoking; a number of diseases; deficiency in calcium and vitamin D; an increased risk of falls (i.e. impaired vision); immobilization; and Caucasian race. The more risk factors that are present the higher the risk of fractures over the following 10 years. The need to initiate preventive therapy with anti-osteoporotic treatment increases steeply with the absolute fracture risk. Indications for referral for dual energy x-ray absorptiometry measurement of BMD include: age >65 years; age <65 years in postmenopausal women with any of the risk factors already mentioned; premature menopause (<45 years); prolonged amenorrhea (>1 year) in younger women; fragility fractures; and diseases or conditions known to lead to osteoporosis.Anti-resorptive therapies include calcium plus vitamin D, bisphosphonates (alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, ibandronate), selective estrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene), hormone replacement therapy, and calcitonin. Guidelines from several countries on when to initiate anti-resorptive therapy state that therapy may be started in patients with a prior fragility fracture (some guidelines state that in this situation no BMD measurements are necessary) or in patients with a T-score of less than -2.5 (some guidelines state that additional risk factors need to be present in this situation). Some guidelines state that anti-resorptive therapy may be initiated in patients with a T-score in the osteopenic range (from -1 to -2.5, i.e. not frank osteoporosis) in the presence of other risk factors. The cost effectiveness of anti-resorptive therapy increases with the absolute fracture risk. In some scenarios, treatment with bisphosphonates may be cost effective in a 50-year-old woman with an absolute hip fracture risk of >or=1.1% over the next 10 years.     

Effect of cyclosporine A on bone density in female rheumatoid arthritis patients: results from a multicenter, cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the influence of cyclosporine A (CYA) on bone using data from a large multicenter, cross-sectional study on bone mineral density (BMD) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We selected 558 female patients with RA and divided them into two groups on the basis of CYA use: those who had never used CYA (n = 467) and CYA users (n = 91; users for < 24 months n = 50; users for > 24 months n = 41). Demographic, disease and treatment-related variables were collected for each patient. BMD was measured at the lumbar spine and proximal femur using dual x-ray absorptiometry. Data was analyzed by means of a univariate and multivariate statistical procedure. Osteoporosis (OP) was defined as BMD < -2.5 T score. RESULTS: The frequency of OP among non-CYA users and CYA users was 28.2% and 33.3% (p=NS) for the lumbar spine, and 34.2% and 31.3% (p=NS) for the femoral neck, respectively. The prevalence of fragility fractures was not significantly different between the two groups. Mean values for the T-score at either the lumbar spine or the femoral neck were comparable in the two groups, even after adjustment for age, menopausal status, body mass index (BMI), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score and steroid use. The generalized linear model showed that age, BMI and the HAQ score were significant independent predictors of BMD at the lumbar and femoral levels, whereas CYA use was not. Logistic analysis showed that only age, the HAQ score and BMI were significantly associated with the risk of OP. However, the duration of CYA therapy > 24 months was associated with an adjusted decreased lumbar BMD and a significantly decreased femoral neck BMD (p = 0.01). The frequency of femoral neck OP in patients on CYA for > 24 months was significantly higher than in patients on CYA for < 24 months: 46.4% vs. 19.44% (p=0.03), while the prevalence of fragility fractures did not differ significantly: 23.1% vs. 16.6%, respectively (p=NS). Logistic analysis showed that CYA use was an independent predictor of osteoporosis at the femoral site. CONCLUSION: Long-term CYA therapy may have negative effects on BMD in female RA patients.     

Bone assessment in elderly women: what does a low bone ultrasound result tell us about bone mineral density?

Access to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can prove difficult for frail or elderly patients, and bone ultrasound may offer a practical alternative. Even after adjustment for bone mineral density (BMD), ultrasound readings are able to predict hip fracture in elderly women. We consider how bone ultrasound might contribute to bone assessment in a clinical setting. DXA remains the gold standard for bone assessment, with osteoporosis defined as a BMD result more than 2.5 S.D. below the young adult mean. Using an equivalent approach we defined an osteoporotic ultrasound result as broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA)<54 dB/MHz. In 73 women aged 29-86 (mean 65) years DXA was used to measure BMD at lumbar spine and hip, and ultrasound to measure BUA at the heel. Correlation of BUA with BMD at femoral neck (r=0.64, P<0.001), and lumbar spine (r=0.55, P<0.001) was consistent with previously reported figures for this ultrasound system. All subjects with BUA below the 54 dB/MHz threshold value were shown to have low femoral neck BMD. Women (42%) aged over 65, but only 18% of younger women had low BUA results. In women over 65 years of age measurements of BUA achieved a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 100% in prediction of low femoral neck BMD. Although a normal BUA did not exclude an osteoporotic BMD result at hip or lumbar spine, a low BUA appeared a highly specific predictor of low BMD at these sites. Since all those women identified as having a low BUA at the heel also had low BMD results, ultrasound appeared to identify a subgroup of elderly patients at a very high risk of fracture.     

Diagnostic value of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in the evaluation of osteoporosis in middle-aged and elderly patients

To study the correlation between calcaneal quantitative ultrasound (QUS) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and analyze the diagnostic value of calcaneal QUS in the evaluation of middle-aged and elderly osteoporosis.We assessed bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck and intertrochanteric of left hip and lumbar spine (L1–L4) sites with DXA and QUS parameters of the right and left calcanei in a cohort of 82 patients over the age of 50 years. Using DXA parameters as the gold standard for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the correlation coefficient between BMD and QUS parameters was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curve was generated and areas under the curves were evaluated. Cut-off values for QUS were defined.In men, there was a moderate correlation between calcaneal QUS and proximal femoral BMD (P < .05), but no significant correlation between calcaneal QUS and lumbar BMD (P > .05). In women, calcaneal QUS were moderately correlated with lumbar spine and proximal femoral BMD (P < .05). Using DXA as the gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of calcaneal QUS in the diagnosis of osteoporosis were 90.2%, 89.2%, 100%, 100%, and 50.0%, respectively. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, when the QUS T-score of calcaneum was –1.8, the area under the curve was 0.888, the sensitivity was 73.21%, and the specificity was 92.31% (P < .05). When the QUS T-score of calcaneum was –2.35, the sensitivity was 37.2% and the specificity was 100%.Calcaneal QUS can be used to predict proximal femoral BMD in middle-aged and elderly people, as well as lumbar BMD in women. As a screening method for osteoporosis, calcaneal QUS has good specificity, so it can be recommended to use it as a pre-screening tool to reduce the number of DXA screening. When the QUS T-score of calcaneum is –1.8, it has the greatest diagnostic efficiency for osteoporosis; when the QUS T-score of calcaneum is ≤–2.35, it can be diagnosed as osteoporosis.     

Development and validation of the osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA) tool to facilitate identification of women likely to have low bone density

Osteoporosis and its consequent increase in fracture risk is a major health concern for postmenopausal women and older men and has the potential to reach epidemic proportions. The "gold standard" for osteoporosis diagnosis is bone densitometry. However, economic issues or availability of the technology may prevent the possibility of mass screening. The goal of this study was to develop and validate a clinical scoring index designed as a prescreening tool to help clinicians identify which women are at increased risk of osteoporosis [bone mineral density (BMD) T-score -2.5 or less] and should therefore undergo further testing with bone densitometry. Records were analyzed for 1522 postmenopausal females over 50 years of age who had undergone testing with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporosis risk index scores were compared to bone density T-scores. Hologic QDR 4500 technology was used to measure BMD at the femoral neck and lumbar spine (L1-L4). Participants who had a previous diagnosis of osteoporosis or were taking bone-active medication were excluded. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to identify the specific cutpoint value that would identify women at increased risk of low BMD. A simple algorithm based on age, weight, history of previous low impact fracture, early menopause, and corticosteroid therapy was developed. Validation of this five-item osteoporosis prescreening risk assessment (OPERA) index showed that the tool, at the recommended threshold (or cutoff value) of two, had a sensitivity that ranged from 88.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) for the mean: 86.2-91.9%] at the femoral neck to 90% (95% CI for the mean: 86.1-93.1%) at the lumbar spine area. Corresponding specificity values were 60.6 (95% CI for the mean: 57.9-63.3%) and 64.2% (95% CI for the mean: 61.4-66.9%), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) ranged from 29 at the femoral neck to 39.2% at the lumbar spine, while the corresponding negative predictive values (NPVs) reached 96.5 and 96.2%, respectively. Based on this cutoff value, the area under the ROC curve was 0.866 (95% CI for the mean: 0.847-0.882) for the lumbar spine and 0.814 (95% CI for the mean: 0.793-0.833) for the femoral neck. We conclude that the OPERA is a free and effective method for identifying Italian postmenopausal women at increased risk of osteoporosis. Its use could facilitate the appropriate and more cost-effective use of bone densitometry in developing countries.     

Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis

The proportion of fractures that occur in women without osteoporosis has not been fully described, and the characteristics of nonosteoporotic women who fracture are not well understood. We measured total hip bone mineral density (BMD) and baseline characteristics including physical activity, falls, and strength for 8065 women aged 65 yr or older participating in the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures and then followed these women for hip fracture for up to 5 yr after BMD measurement. Among all participants, 17% had osteoporosis (total hip BMD T-score < or = -2.5). Of the 243 women with incident hip fracture, 54% were not osteoporotic at start of follow-up. Nonosteoporotic women who fractured were less likely than osteoporotic women with fracture to have baseline characteristics associated with frailty. Nevertheless, among nonosteoporotic participants, several characteristics increased fracture risk, including advancing age, lack of exercise in the last year, reduced visual contrast sensitivity, falls in the last year, prevalent vertebral fracture, and lower total hip BMD. These findings call attention to the many older women who suffer hip fracture but do not have particularly low antecedent BMD measures and help begin to identify risk factors associated with higher bone density levels.     

Vertebral fractures in males with prolactinoma

Data on osteoporotic fractures in hyperprolactinemia are limited. An increased prevalence of radiological vertebral fractures was recently observed in women with prolactin (PRL)-secreting adenoma, whereas it is unknown whether this observation may reflect a more general increased risk of fractures in this disease and whether the prevalence of fractures in males is affected by gonadal status. Thirty-two males (median age 47 years, range: 22-79) with PRL-secreting pituitary adenoma (10 with microadenoma and 22 with macroadenoma) and 64 control males, with normal PRL values and with comparable age to patients with hyperprolactinemia, were evaluated for vertebral fractures by a morphometric approach and for bone mineral density (BMD) by a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at lumbar spine. Vertebral fractures were shown in 12 patients with PRL-secreting adenoma (37.5%) and in 5 controls (7.8%, P < 0.001). Fractured patients had lower BMD T-score (P = 0.007) and longer duration of disease (P < 0.001) as compared to patients who did not fracture. Fractures occurred more frequently (P = 0.03) in patients with untreated hyperprolactinemia versus patients treated with cabergoline whose frequency of vertebral fractures was still higher than control subjects. The prevalence of vertebral fractures was not significantly different between eugonadal and hypogonadal patients (33.3% vs. 38.5%; P = 0.8). Moreover, no significant (P = 0.4) difference in serum testosterone values was found between fractured and not fractured males. Hyperprolactinemia is associated with high prevalence of radiological vertebral fractures in men with PRL-secreting adenoma. These findings would also suggest that PRL excess may produce negative skeletal effects independently of hypogonadism.     

Association of the F352V variant of the Klotho gene with bone mineral density

Klotho gene codes for a protein with glucuronidase activity and is thought to influence bone and vascular homeostasis. We studied the relationship of a common T/G polymorphism, resulting in a phenylalanine (F) to valine (V) substitution at aminoacid position 352, with bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporotic fractures. The study group comprised 914 Spanish women, including 438 control subjects, 190 patients with osteoporosis, 198 with hip fractures, and 88 patients with severe osteoarthritis. BMD was measured by DEXA in 540 women from the control and osteoporosis groups. Allele frequencies were 86% and 14%, for the F and V alleles, respectively. In comparison with the most common FF genotype, postmenopausal women with FV/VV genotypes had higher hip BMD (femoral neck: 0.673 ± 0.011 vs. 0.644 ± 0.006 g/cm²; P = 0.02; total hip: 0.807 ± 0.014 vs. 0.774 ± 0.008 g/cm²; P = 0.03). Klotho alleles explained about 1.5% of BMD variance, but were not associated to the risk of osteoporotic spine or hip fractures. The Klotho genotype was not associated to BMD in premenopausal women. In conclusion, the F352V Klotho polymorphism is associated with BMD in postmenopausal women, suggesting that Klotho gene variants influence skeletal aging.     

The threshold of bone mineral density for vertebral fractures in female patients with primary hyperparathyroidism

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) is one of the causal diseases that induce secondary osteoporosis. Although patients with pHPT have reduced bone mineral density (BMD) especially at the cortical bone, there have been controversies about risk of fracture. Moreover, no reports have been available about the threshold of BMD for fractures in pHPT patients. METHODS: BMD values were measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at lumbar spine, femoral neck and distal one third of radius. Various indices were compared in 116 female pHPT patients and 716 control subjects. Moreover, we analyzed relationship between the cut-off values of BMD and the prevalence of vertebral fractures in pHPT and control subjects. RESULTS: The prevalence of subjects with vertebral fractures was lower in pHPT patients, compared with that of control subjects. Age and body height were significantly higher and lower in pHPT women with vertebral fractures, respectively. Lumbar spine BMD was significantly lower in pHPT women with vertebral fractures, presumably due to their increased age. There were no differences in femoral neck and radius BMD or in bone metabolic indices between pHPT women with and without vertebral fractures. On the other hand, age-matched BMD was not significantly different between both groups at any measured site. Cut-off values of BMD at lumbar spine and femoral neck were lower in postmenopausal pHPT patients, compared with those of the postmenopausal control group. Moreover, cut-off values of BMD at radius was much lower in postmenopausal pHPT patients, compared with those of the postmenopausal control group (pHPT vs control (g/cm(2)): 0.670 vs 0.706 at lumbar spine; 0.549 vs 0.570 at femoral; 0.394 vs 0.474 at radius). Sensitivity and specificity of vertebral fractures was lower in pHPT patients, compared with those in control group. CONCLUSIONS: The present cross-sectional study demonstrated that thresholds of BMD for vertebral fractures were lower especially at radial bone in female patients with pHPT, compared with those in the control group.     

Fracture thresholds in osteoporosis: implications for hormone replacement treatment.

The bone mineral densities of the lumbar spine and femoral neck were determined by dual energy chi ray absorptiometry in 110 women aged 40-82 years (average 65 years) with spinal osteoporosis who had had at least one atraumatic vertebral compression fracture and in 1026 normal women aged 40-79 years (average 52 years). The women with osteoporosis showed a significant decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and femoral neck compared with age matched normal women (sixth decade of life -26% spine, -23% femoral neck; seventh decade -26% spine, -16% femoral neck). The fracture threshold, defined as the 90th centile of spinal BMD for women with osteoporosis, was 0.81 g/cm2 at the lumbar spine and 0.656 g/cm2 at the femoral neck. Five per cent of normal women aged 40-49 years, 20% aged 50-59 years, and 45% aged 60-69 years had a BMD below this threshold. To maintain the bones of women above the fracture threshold until the age of 70 years about 50% of postmenopausal women need hormone replacement therapy. However, if the BMD is to be kept above the fracture threshold for a women's lifetime, e.g. until the age of 80-90 years, then most women will need treatment, though for various lengths of time depending on their initial BMD. Measurements of BMD in postmenopausal women currently help in identifying the risk of osteoporotic fractures but in the lifetime assessment of risk in a single subject they may have a more important role in deciding the duration of hormone replacement therapy.     

Osteoporosis in men

Male osteoporosis is an increasingly important public health problem: from age 50 onward, one in three osteoporotic fractures occurs in men and fracture-related morbidity and mortality are even higher than in women. In 50% of osteoporotic men, an underlying cause can be identified (secondary osteoporosis). In the absence of an identifiable etiology, male osteoporosis is referred to as 'idiopathic osteoporosis' in men aged 30-70 years and as 'age-related osteoporosis' in older men. As in women, estrogen, not testosterone, appears the most important sex steroid regulating male skeletal status. Diagnosis and treatment recommendations are still largely based on bone mineral density (BMD), with osteoporosis defined as a T-score of 2.5 standard deviations below young adult values. However, there is ongoing discussion as to whether male or female reference ranges should be used and, like in women, treatment decisions are increasingly based on absolute fracture risk estimations rather than on BMD alone. In men, evidence-based data on the efficacy of pharmacologic interventions in reducing fracture risk are convincing but not conclusive. In particular, bisphosphonates and teriparatide seem to be as effective in men as in women.