Effectiveness of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy without mitomycin-C for the treatment of high myopia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and therapeutic range of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) without mitomycin-C (MMC) to treat high myopia. SETTING: Isik Eye Clinic, Ankara, Turkey. METHODS: This study comprised 31 highly myopic eyes (19 patients) that had LASEK. Before primary LASEK treatment and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after, all patients had a complete ophthalmic examination including visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and biomicroscopy. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -9.01 diopters (D) +/- 2.66 (SD) preoperatively and -1.00 +/- 1.15 D at the end of follow-up. At 24 months, the mean SE was within +/-1.00 D of the intended correction in 23 eyes (74.19%). The median uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) increased from 20/606 preoperatively to 20/28.6 at 24 months and the median best corrected visual acuity, from 20/25 to 20/22, respectively. Total higher-order and spherical aberrations increased significantly at the end of follow-up. All 14 eyes that had ablations greater than -8.62 D developed varying degrees of haze. Significant myopic regression (>1.00 D) leading to UCVA loss occurred in all eyes with a preoperative SE of -12.00 D or greater. CONCLUSIONS: The results of LASEK without MMC were excellent in eyes with up to -8.6 D of SE. All eyes with a preoperative SE between -8.6 and -12.0 D developed haze but had acceptable refractive and visual outcomes. Haze and myopic regression limited the success of LASEK in eyes with a preoperative SE of -12.0 D and greater.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 22 eyes of 20 patients had LASEK retreatment for residual refractive errors after LASIK. All patients who had the procedure between January 2004 and May 2007 were included in the study. The main outcome measures at the final follow-up visit were efficacy, predictability, safety, and stability. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -4.50 diopters (D)+/-2.88 (SD) (range -10.00 to +3.87 D) before LASIK and -1.23+/-0.95 D (range -2.50 to +2.00 D) after LASIK. The mean time between the initial LASIK procedure and LASEK enhancement was 56.2+/-24.3 months (range 6 to 84 months). The mean follow-up after retreatment was 6.68+/-6.47 months (range 3 to 24 months). At the final follow-up visit, 19 eyes (86.4%) had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/30 or better and 17 eyes (77.3%) were within +/-1.00 D of the target refraction. No patient lost more than 1 line of best corrected visual acuity or developed corneal haze greater than grade 1. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that LASEK retreatment after LASIK is a safe and effective alternative when LASIK retreatment is deemed unsafe because there is not sufficient residual corneal stromal bed or when retreatment is required many years after LASIK and relifting the original flap is expected to be problematic.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of high myopia

PURPOSE: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) in the treatment of high myopia. SETTING: Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, and Balgeunsesang Ophthalmology Clinic, Seoul, South Korea. METHODS: Four hundred seventy eyes of 240 patients with manifest refraction spherical components greater than -6.00 diopters (D) were assigned to 2 groups: 324 eyes (167 patients) were treated with LASIK and 146 eyes (73 patients), with LASEK. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), remaining refractive error, corneal haze, and complications were followed in both groups for 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) was within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia in 205 eyes (63.3%) in the LASIK group and 81 eyes (55.5%) in the LASEK group and within +/-1.00 D in 261 eyes (80.6%) and 104 eyes (71.2%), respectively. The UCVA was 20/25 or better in 269 LASIK eyes (83.0%) and 111 LASEK eyes (76.0%). There was more than a 1-line loss of BSCVA in 4 LASIK eyes (1.2%) and 21 LASEK eyes (14.3%). The between-group differences in SE, magnitude of cylinder, UCVA, and haze were statistically significant (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both LASIK and LASEK were safe and effectively treated eyes with high myopia. Laser in situ keratomileusis provided superior results in visual predictability and corneal opacity.     

Surface ablation after laser in situ keratomileusis: retreatment on the flap

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of superficial laser ablation on the flap as a treatment for residual ametropia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Private practice refractive surgery center, Utrecht, The Netherlands. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised 18 eyes of 15 patients who had alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) retreatment for residual ametropia after LASIK. All patients who had retreatment on the flap between June 2004 and June 2005 were included in the study. Retreatments were performed by wavefront-guided excimer laser surface ablation using the Visx Star S4 laser. Outcome measures included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), subjective refraction, and biomicroscopy at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative visits. RESULTS: The preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was -0.63 diopter (D) +/- 0.87 (SD) (range -2.00 to +1.38 D). The mean amount of ablated cornea was 21.3 +/- 7.4 microm. At 3 months, the mean UCVA was 0.83 +/- 1.5 lines (range 0.40 to 1.25), yielding an efficacy index of 0.87. At 6 months, the mean UCVA increased to 0.98 +/- 0.8 line (range 0.63 to 1.25) and the efficacy index, to 1.03. At 12 months, 6 eyes were lost to follow-up. The mean UCVA was 0.83 +/- 2.2 lines (range 0.20 to 1.25), with an efficacy index of 0.87. The mean BSCVA was 0.98 +/- 0.9 line (range 0.80 to 1.25) at 3 months and 1.05 +/- 0.6 line (range 0.80 to 1.25) at 6 months, yielding a safety index of 1.03 and 1.11, respectively. At 12 months, the mean BSCVA was 0.95 +/- 1.0 line (range 0.63 to 1.25), with a safety index of 1.0. At 6 months, no eye had lost lines of BSCVA, 11 eyes had no change, and 7 eyes gained 1 line. At 12 months, 2 eyes lost 1 line of BSCVA, 8 eyes had no change, and 2 eyes gained 1 line. The mean SE refraction was +0.10 +/- 0.27 D (range -0.25 to +0.63 D) at 3 months, +0.06 +/- 0.37 D (range -0.50 to +1.13 D) at 6 months, and +0.15 +/- 0.39 D (range -0.50 to +0.88 D) at 12 months. On biomicroscopic examination, 1 eye had prolonged grade 1 haze that disappeared before 6 months. Two eyes of 1 patient who had hyperopic retreatment developed late-onset haze 8 months postoperatively. Eyes with microstriae in the flap before retreatment showed significant improvement after retreatment. There were no sight-threatening complications. CONCLUSION: Wavefront-guided LASEK or alcohol-assisted PRK retreatment on the surface of a LASIK flap was safe and effective in correcting small amounts of residual myopia.     

Photorefractive keratectomy with 0.02% mitomycin C for treatment of residual refractive errors after LASIK

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic mitomycin C (MMC) during photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) over LASIK flaps for the treatment of residual refractive errors following LASIK. METHODS: In this single center, retrospective clinical study, 30 eyes of 33 patients (mean age 37.2 years) who had MMC (0.02%, 30 to 120 seconds) during PRK for the treatment of residual refractive errors following myopic LASIK were evaluated. The retreatment procedures were performed with a VISX S4 laser with iris registration. All patients underwent slit-lamp microscopy, manifest and cycloplegic refraction, corneal topography, pachymetry, pupillometry, and wavefront analysis pre- and postoperatively. All patients underwent follow-up at 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months and thereafter as required. RESULTS: Mean time between LASIK and PRK retreatment was 67.3 months (range: 7 to 113 months). No intra- or postoperative complications occurred during primary LASIK or PRK retreatment. Mean spherical equivalent refraction of attempted correction with PRK was -0.94 diopters (D) (range: -2.38 to +0.75 D). At mean 7.1-month follow-up, the average uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) improved from 20/50 (range: 20/30 to 20/200) to 20/28 (range: 20/15 to 20/70). Twenty-seven of 30 eyes showed improvement in UCVA. Two eyes had subjective improvement of glare symptoms (and objective improvement in higher order aberrations), and one eye lost one line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity due to unrelated corneal abrasion in the postoperative period. None of the eyes in the cohort developed postoperative haze. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy with prophylactic MMC (0.02%) is a safe and effective option for treating myopic regression following LASIK. A single intraoperative application of 0.02% MMC for as few as 30 seconds was effective in preventing postoperative haze formation.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy in children

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) achieves effective targeted myopic correction with less post-treatment corneal haze than observed with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in children who fail traditional forms of treatment for myopic anisometropic amblyopia and high myopia. SETTING: Nonhospital surgical facility with follow-up in a hospital clinic setting. METHODS: This prospective study comprised 36 eyes of 25 patients. The mean patient age at treatment was 8.27 years (range 1.0 to 17.4 years). Patients were divided into 3 groups: those with myopic anisometropic amblyopia (13 patients/13 eyes), those with bilateral high myopia (11 patients/22 eyes), and those with high myopia post-penetrating keratoplasty (1 patient/1 eye). All patients were treated with LASEK under general anesthesia using the Visx 20/20 B excimer laser and a multizone, multipass ablation technique. Although the myopia was as high as -22.00 diopters (D) spherical equivalent (SE) in some eyes, no eye was treated for more than -19.00 D SE. RESULTS: At 1 year, the mean SE decreased from -8.03 D to -1.19 D. Forty-four percent of eyes were within +/-1.0 D of the targeted correction; 78% of eyes had clear corneas with no haze. In the entire group, the mean best corrected visual acuity improved from 20/80 to 20/50. A functional-vision survey demonstrated a positive effect on the patients' ability to function in their environments after LASEK. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy in children represents another method of providing long-term resolution of bilateral high myopia and myopic anisometropic amblyopia with minimal post-laser haze. The reduction in post-laser haze with LASEK compared to that with the standard PRK technique may represent an advantage in treating these complex patients.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of hyperopia. Results of a 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy, safety, predictability, and stability of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for low to moderate hyperopia with a 2-year follow-up. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. METHODS: This prospective comparative single-surgeon study included 216 eyes of 108 patients with hyperopia who received PRK in 1 eye and LASEK in the contralateral eye. The mean patient age was 38.3 years (range 25 to 58 years). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) cycloplegic refraction was +3.67 diopters (D) +/- 1.15 (SD) (range +2.00 to +5.00 D), and astigmatism was less than 1.00 D. In each patient, PRK was performed in 1 eye (Group A) and LASEK was performed in the other eye (Group B) using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, manifest and cycloplegic refractions, refractive stability and predictability, postoperative pain, and corneal haze were examined and statistically analyzed. A P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: At 1 week, the UCVA was 20/40 or better in 58% of PRK eyes and 85% of LASEK eyes (P =.037); at 2 years, it was 20/40 or better in 81% and 91%, respectively (P =.076). At 2 years, the UCVA for near was N8 or better in 73% of PRK eyes and 89% of LASEK eyes (P =.064). No patient lost 2 or more lines of Snellen visual acuity. The safety index was 1.03 in PRK eyes and 1.08 in LASEK eyes. Refractive stability was achieved at 6 months in LASEK eyes and at 12 months in PRK eyes. The mean SE cycloplegic refraction decreased from +3.58 D (PRK eyes) and +3.76 D (LASEK eyes) at baseline to +0.74 D and +0.32 D, respectively, at 2 years; in 57% and 78% of eyes, respectively, the refraction was within +/-0.50 D of the targeted refraction. Peripheral corneal haze scores at 3 to 9 months and pain scores at 1 to 3 days were significantly lower in the LASEK group than in the PRK group. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for hyperopia up to +5.00 D provided good visual and refractive results. It significantly reduced postoperative pain, grade of peripheral ring-shaped corneal haze, and regression of hyperopia. Hyperopic LASEK provided quicker visual recovery and achieved better efficacy, predictability, and refractive stability than hyperopic PRK.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy enhancement of residual myopia after primary myopic LASEK: six-month results in 10 eyes

PURPOSE: To determine whether residual myopia after primary laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) can be corrected by repeated LASEK and whether this procedure is safe and effective. SETTING: University Eye Clinic, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. METHODS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy was performed in 10 eyes that had had primary LASEK for myopia. The initial mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -6.2 diopters (D) (range -2.5 to -8.0 D), and the residual mean SE was -1.6 D (range -1.0 to -3.0 D). The retreatment ratio was 7.6%. The exposure time of the corneal epithelium to alcohol (20% ethanol) was 30 seconds plus an additional 10 to 15 seconds in cases of strong epithelial adherence. Laser ablation was performed with a Keracor 117 excimer laser (Chiron Technolas). The follow-up after the second LASEK treatment was 6 months. RESULTS: The epithelial flap for repeated LASEK was successfully created in all 10 eyes. The postoperative course in the eyes was uneventful. Six months after LASEK enhancement, the SE refraction was within +/-0.5 D in all eyes. No eye lost more than 1 line of best corrected visual acuity, and the uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 8 eyes. Significant haze was not observed after repeated LASEK (mean 0.35 before and 6 months after LASEK enhancement). CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy enhancement appears to be safe and effective for the correction of residual myopia after primary LASEK. Repeated epithelial flap preparation is possible without technical modifications.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for low to high myopia and astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for the treatment of low to high myopia and astigmatism. SETTING: Solo private practice, Mountain View, California, USA. METHODS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy was performed in 146 eyes of 83 consecutive patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism using a VISX Star S2 excimer laser (72 eyes) or a Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser (74 eyes). The mean preoperative myopic spherical equivalent was -5.32 diopters (D) (range -1.25 to -14.38 D). Data were collected prospectively with a follow-up of 1 to 12 months. Outcome measurements included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refraction, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), corneal haze, and complications. RESULTS: After 6 and 12 months, no eye lost 2 or more lines of BSCVA. After 6 months, the UCVA was 20/20 in 57% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 96%. After 12 months, it was 20/20 in 56% of eyes and 20/40 or better in 96%. No eye developed corneal haze that affected visual acuity. There were no serious or vision-threatening complications. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy was safe and effective in treating a wide range of myopia and astigmatism. The potential advantages of LASEK over laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) include the elimination of stromal flap complications and greater choice in patient selection. The disadvantages include varying degrees of pain for 2 days and blurry vision for several days postoperatively.     

Effect of amniotic membrane after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy on epithelial healing: clinical and refractive outcomes

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of an amniotic membrane (AM) on reepithelialization time, corneal haze, and postoperative visual and refractive outcomes after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for myopia and myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, and Balgeunsesang Ophthalmology Clinic, Seoul, Korea. METHODS: One hundred fifty-two eyes of 84 patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism were prospectively evaluated for 6 months after LASEK. An AM was placed as a strip on the inferior limbus in 94 eyes of 54 patients after LASEK; 58 eyes of 30 patients served as the control group. Postoperative epithelial healing time, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, remaining refractive error, and corneal haze were examined. RESULTS: The reepithelialization time was shorter in the AM group (2.40 days +/- 0.94 [SD]) than in the control group (3.90 +/- 0.97 days) (P<.001). At 6 months, 86 eyes (91.5%) in the AM group had a UCVA of 20/25 or better and 90 eyes (95.7%) had a UCVA of 20/40 or better; 48 eyes (82.8%) and 53 eyes (91.4%) in the control group had a UCVA of 20/25 or better and 20/40 or better, respectively. The mean spherical equivalent in the AM group was -0.48 +/- 0.54 diopter (D) and in the control group, -0.94 +/- 0.60 D (P<.001). The corneal haze was significantly less in the AM group than in the control group (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Amniotic membrane use after LASEK induced rapid epithelial healing with more favorable visual and refractive outcomes and lower corneal haze scores than conventional LASEK.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for myopia: two-year follow-up

PURPOSE: To assess and compare the clinical results (efficacy, safety, stability, and postoperative pain or discomfort) of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of low to moderate myopia. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. METHODS: A prospective comparative study was performed in 184 eyes of 92 patients who had surface excimer ablation for the correction of myopia. The preoperative mean spherical equivalent (MSE) was -4.65 diopters (D) +/- 3.14 (SD) (range -1.75 to -7.50 D). In each patient, LASEK was performed in 1 eye and PRK in the fellow eye by the same surgeon. The first eye treated and the surgical method used in the first eye were randomized. Both procedures were performed with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser using the same parameters and nomogram. The postoperative pain level, visual recovery, complications (haze), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and refractive outcome were evaluated and compared. All eyes completed a 24-month follow-up. RESULTS: The postoperative MSE was -0.18 +/- 0.53 D in the PRK eyes and -0.33 +/- 0.46 D in the LASEK eyes. At 1 week, the mean UCVA was 0.64 +/- 0.21 and 0.87 +/- 0.23, respectively. No LASEK eye lost a line of BSCVA. There were no statistically significant differences between PRK and LASEK eyes in the safety and efficacy indices at 2 years. The mean pain level was significantly lower on days 1 to 3 in the LASEK eyes (P <.05). The mean corneal haze level was lower in the LASEK eyes (0.21) than in the PRK eyes (0.43) (P <.05). Seventy-nine patients preferred LASEK to PRK. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy provided significantly quicker visual recovery, eliminated post-PRK pain, and reduced the haze level in eyes with low to moderate myopia compared with conventional PRK. It provided good visual and refractive outcomes. There were no serious complications.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis versus surface ablation: visual outcomes and complications

PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcomes and complications of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with those of surface treatment by laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK), photorefractive keratectomy with mechanical epithelial removal (M-PRK), and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (T-PRK). SETTING: Tertiary care eye center. METHODS: This retrospective review comprised all cases of LASIK, LASEK, M-PRK, and T-PRK performed at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital between July 1, 2004, and June 30, 2005. Separate statistical analyses were performed for eyes with low to moderate myopia (spherical equivalent [SE] less than -6.00 diopters [D]) and high myopia (SE -6.00 to -11.25 D). RESULTS: Of 696 eyes that met the inclusion criteria, 464 had LASIK, 104 had LASEK, 69 had M-PRK, and 59 had T-PRK. Eyes with low to moderate myopia had a statistically significantly smaller mean difference between logMAR final postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) after T-PRK and M-PRK than after LASIK or LASEK. A higher percentage of eyes with high myopia had a final UCVA within +/-2 lines of the preoperative BSCVA with T-PRK than with LASIK, LASEK, or M-PRK. There were more major non-flap-related complications after LASEK than after LASIK, M-PRK, or T-PRK. CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with low to moderate myopia, T-PRK and M-PRK provided slightly better visual outcomes than LASIK or LASEK. In eyes with high myopia, T-PRK provided better visual outcomes than LASIK, LASEK, and M-PRK. Laser in situ keratomileusis was associated with the most major postoperative complications.     

Excimer laser retreatment of residual myopia following photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy for compound myopic astigmatism

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the safety, efficacy, and visual performance of excimer laser enhancement following photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) with the Summit Apex Plus. SETTING: Stanford University School of Medicine Eye Laser Clinic, Stanford, California, USA. METHODS: As part of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial, 93 eyes of 56 patients with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of -4.98 diopters (D) +/- 1.80 (SD) (range -1.75 to -8.50 D) had PARK for compound myopic astigmatism using the Summit Apex Plus excimer laser and a poly(methyl methacrylate) erodible mask. Seventeen eyes with a mean SE of -2.08 +/- 0.76 D required excimer laser refractive keratectomy for residual spherical myopia or compound myopic astigmatism. Patients were prospectively followed 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12+ months after the enhancement procedure. Primary outcome variables included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), refraction, vector analysis, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) under standard ambient conditions (photopic, scotopic, and glare), corneal clarity, and contrast sensitivity function curve under photopic and scotopic conditions. RESULTS: At the last postoperative visit, the mean sphere had been corrected 82% to a residual of -0.29 +/- 1.23 D and mean SE had been corrected 65% to a residual of -0.74 +/- 1.27 D. Eighty-two percent of eyes were within +/-1.0 D of attempted correction. Eighty-eight percent had a UCVA of 20/40 or better. Vector analysis demonstrated a difference vector of within +/-1.0 D in 75% of eyes that had PARK retreatment. There was no significant loss in the contrast sensitivity curve. Late regression associated with corneal haze and loss of BSCVA occurred in 2 eyes (11.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Retreatment following PARK for compound myopic astigmatism results in effective reduction in residual spherical myopia and compound myopic astigmatism. An improvement in UCVA without loss of contrast sensitivity can be expected in most eyes. However, regression, corneal haze, and loss of BSCVA may occur. Further studies are indicated to predict risk factors for these complications.     

Laser subepithelial keratomileusis for myopia of -6 to -10 diopters with astigmatism with the MEL60 laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, and safety of laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for treatment of high myopia with astigmatism. METHODS: LASEK was performed in 61 eyes of 36 consecutive patients with myopic spherical equivalent refraction of -6.00 to -10.00 D using the Aesculap-Meditec MEL60 excimer laser. Data were collected prospectively with a follow-up of 6 to 17 months. Main outcome measures recorded were UCVA, BSCVA, residual refractive error, corneal haze, and complications. RESULTS: Ninety-six percent of eyes achieved 20/40 or better UCVA at 1 month. At 12 months, 64% of eyes achieved 20/20 and 92% achieved 20/40 or better UCVA. Two eyes lost 2 lines of BSCVA at 6 or 12 months. Accuracy of correction was +/- 0.50 D from emmetropia in 82% of eyes, and +/- 1.00 D in 90% at 12 months. No eye showed more than grade 1 haze. Grade 1 haze was observed in three eyes at 12 months. One patient had mild postoperative keratitis, which was successfully treated. CONCLUSIONS: LASEK with the Aesculap-Meditec MEL60 excimer laser appeared to be safe, effective, and highly predictable in treating high myopia.     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) without alcohol versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)

PURPOSE: To evaluate epithelial healing and visual outcome after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) without alcohol de-epithelialization and to compare this technique to photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in myopia. METHODS: In a series of 1953 patients undergoing bilateral myopic PRK, an epithelial flap could be obtained by manual de-epithelialization in the left eye of 56 patients without alcohol exposure. The right eye was treated by PRK and the left by LASEK (i.e., repositioning the viable flap after surface ablation). The two eyes were compared in terms of pain, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) in decimals, correction achieved, and haze. The epithelial healing pattern was assessed in the LASEK eyes. RESULTS: The flap remained viable, showing a peripheral junction, in 25 eyes (45%). Pain was higher in the PRK eye in 11/56 patients (20%), higher in the LASEK eye in 23/56 patients (41%), and the same in both eyes in 22/56 patients (39%). UCVA at one week was slightly better in the LASEK eyes (median 0.7 versus 0.6, p = 0.002 with Wilcoxon test), but was the same in PRK and LASEK eyes after 1 month (median 0.9 in both). Median haze at 6 months was 0.5 in the PRK eyes and 0 in the LASEK eyes (Wilcoxon p = 0.007). Median postoperative defocus equivalent at 9 months was 0.5 diopters in both the PRK and the LASEK eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Although our study might have selected patients with loose epithelium, LASEK performed by manual de-epithelialization in the absence of alcohol exposure is not less painful than PRK, even in case of flap survival. Visual recovery speed, as well as haze, is slightly better than in PRK, although the difference is clinically negligible.     

矢量法分析LASEK和LASIK矫正高度散光的疗效

目的应用Thibos矢量法比较准分子激光上皮瓣下角膜磨镶术（laser subepithelial keratomileusis,LASEK）和准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术（laser in situ keratomileusis,LASIK）矫正高度散光（≥-2．75D）的疗效。方法LASEK59例（59眼）,LASIK37例（37眼）。分析两组患者术前和术后裸眼视力（uncorrected visual acuity,UCVA）、最佳矫正视力（best corrected visual acuity,BCVA）、屈光度（S球镜,C柱镜,M等效球镜）和模糊指数B的差别。结果除LASIK组BCVA外,所有患者术前和术后UCVA、BCVA、S、M、C、B差异均有统计学意义。术后两组间S、C、M、B差异均无统计学意义,BCVA较术前无一例发生下降2行。结论LASEK和LASIK手术方式均安全、手术效果可靠,是治疗高度散光的有效方法。Thibos矢量分析能够全面地描述眼屈光异常和屈光手术疗效。     

Laser epithelial keratomileusis for the treatment of low to moderate myopia: preliminary results

PURPOSE: To analyze the refractive outcome and the postoperative pain and corneal haze following laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for the treatment of low to moderate myopia. METHODS: A monocentric prospective noncomparative study was started in June 2000, after informed consent was obtained from patients with a spherical equivalent of less than -5 diopters (D). This study actually was part of another prospective comparative study where the contralateral eye underwent photorefractive keratectomy. An epithelial debridement was performed using diluted ethanol, the epithelial flap was lifted, photoablation was performed, the flap was put back in place, and secured by a bandage contact lens. The refractive outcome was assessed, and postoperative pain and haze were graded using an analogical visual scale from 0 to 10 and a scale of 0 to 4, respectively. RESULTS: We included 17 eyes of 16 patients. LASEK was performed successfully in 15 eyes (88.2%). One of these eyes could not be assessed for the refractive outcome and postoperative haze because the epithelial flap was torn during contact lens removal. The mean postoperative pain level during the night following the procedure was 5.7+/-2.0. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -2.5+/-1.0 D, and after a 2-month follow-up, the mean postoperative SE was +0.26+/-0.6 D. Twelve eyes (85.7%) and 10 eyes (71.4%) were within +/-1.0 D and +/-0.5 D from the attempted correction, respectively. The corneal haze grade was less than 1 in 12 eyes (85.7%) and equal to 1 in two eyes (14.3%). No complications and no loss of postoperative best-corrected visual acuity were noted. CONCLUSIONS: LASEK appears to be a reliable and reproducible technique for the treatment of myopia-associated SE of less than -5 D. Postoperative pain is moderate and flap-related complications of LASIK are avoided.     

Comparison of wavefront aberration changes in the anterior corneal surface after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: preliminary study

PURPOSE: To compare changes in anterior corneal wavefront aberrations after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Institute of Ophthalmology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy. METHODS: This prospective study included 36 eyes of 25 myopic patients: 18 eyes of 12 patients had LASEK and 18 eyes of 13 patients, LASIK. The topography data (CSO EyeMap, version 6.2) were used to calculate corneal aberrations with 3.0 mm and 7.0 mm pupils before and 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Total corneal aberrations increased similarly after LASEK and LASIK with the 7.0 mm pupil but did not change with the 3.0 mm pupil. Coma-like and spherical-like aberrations changed similarly after both procedures, but spherical-like aberrations increased after LASEK with the 3.0 mm pupil (P<.05, independent t test). With the 7.0 mm pupil, the amount of achieved correction was positively correlated with changes in total corneal aberrations after LASIK (P =.007) and with spherical-like aberrations after LASEK (P =.03) and LASIK (P<.003). Although there was no significant difference between LASEK and LASIK (P>.05, independent t test), in individual eyes with an achieved correction less than 7.50 diopters (D), spherical-like aberrations increased more after LASEK than after LASIK. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, myopic LASEK and LASIK changed total and higher-order corneal aberrations. In both procedures, changes in spherical-like aberrations were dependent on the achieved correction. However, in individual eyes, spherical-like aberrations increased more after LASEK than after LASIK for low-moderate achieved correction, suggesting that these procedures may induce the same optical changes in the anterior corneal surface in different ways.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for residual myopia after photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopic regression and undercorrection after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). SETTING: The Eye Institute, Sydney, Australia. METHODS: Fifty eyes of 32 patients were treated by LASIK for residual myopia following primary PRK. The mean spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) was -2.92 diopters (D) +/- 1.57 (SD) (range -0.75 to -7.88 D). The mean refractive cylinder was 0.96 +/- 0.74 D (range 0 to 3.50 D). For analysis, the eyes were divided into 2 groups: those with 0 or low corneal haze (Group 1) and those with severe corneal haze (Group 2). In Group 1, the SEQ was -1.99 +/- 0.79 D (range -0.75 to -3.75 D) and in Group 2, -3.77 +/- 1.62 D (range -0.75 to -7.90 D). The procedure was performed using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper and the Summit Apex Plus laser. The mean interval between PRK and LASIK was 25 months (range 9 to 59 months). The following parameters were studied before and after LASIK retreatment: SEQ, mean refractive cylinder, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Complications after LASIK retreatment were evaluated. RESULTS: Six months after LASIK, the mean SEQ in all eyes was -0.65 +/- 0.86 D (range +1.50 to -3.35 D); 70.0% of eyes were within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia and the UCVA was 6/12 or better in 72.5%. The mean SEQ in Group 1 was -0.22 +/- 0.55 D (range -0.88 to -1.50 D) and in Group 2, -0.97+/- 0.92 D (range 0.12 to -3.25 D); the UCVA was 6/12 or better in 94.0% of eyes in Group 1 and in 56.0% in Group 2. No statistically significant between-group difference was found in lines of Snellen acuity lost or gained at 6 months. No eye lost more than 1 line of BCVA. CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis appears to be a safe, effective, and predictable procedure for treating eyes with 0 or low haze with residual myopia after PRK. It is less predictable in eyes with severe haze.     

Analysis of the efficacy, predictability, and safety of LASEK for myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Technolas 217 excimer laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, predictability, and safety of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. SETTING: Stanford University Eye Laser Center, Stanford, California, USA. METHODS: This retrospective analysis comprised 102 eyes that had LASEK for myopia using the Bausch & Lomb Technolas 217 excimer laser. Primary outcome variables including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle- corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, and complications were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months. Vector analysis was performed on eyes that received astigmatic correction. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent was -7.03 diopters (D) +/- 2.61 (SD) preoperatively, +0.19 +/- 0.64 D at 3 months, +0.23 +/- 0.82 D at 6 months, and +0.03 +/- 0.63 D at 12 months (P<.001). At 3, 6, and 12 months, the UCVA was 20/20 or better in 66%, 67%, and 83% of eyes, respectively, and 20/40 or better in 98%, 99%, and 100%; 74%, 70%, and 83%, respectively, were within +/-0.5 D of emmetropia, and 89%, 86%, and 97%, respectively, were within +/-1.0 D. No eye lost more than 2 lines of BSCVA. At 3, 6, and 12 months, 10.0%, 8.7%, and 0% of eyes, respectively, had trace corneal haze. Vector analysis found a success rate of approximately 78% to 80% in achieving the astigmatic surgical correction at the 3 postoperative visits. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy was an effective, predictable, and safe procedure for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Further studies are needed to determine the role of LASEK in the refractive surgery spectrum.