Superior efficacy of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III study of the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tamoxifen with that of letrozole, an oral aromatase inhibitor, with tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred seven patients were randomly assigned letrozole 2.5 mg once daily (453 patients) or tamoxifen 20 mg once daily (454 patients). Patients had estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive tumors, or both receptors were unknown. Recurrence during adjuvant antiestrogen therapy or within the following 12 months or prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease precluded enrollment. One prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease was allowed. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). Secondary end points included overall objective response rate (ORR), its duration, rate and duration of clinical benefit, time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival, and tolerability. RESULTS: TTP was significantly longer for letrozole than for tamoxifen (median, 41 v 26 weeks). Treatment with letrozole reduced the risk of progression by 30% (hazards ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.82, P =.0001). TTP was significantly longer for letrozole irrespective of dominant site of disease, receptor status, or prior adjuvant antiestrogen therapy. Similarly, TTF was significantly longer for letrozole (median, 40 v 25 weeks). ORR was higher for letrozole (30% v 20%; P =.0006), as was the rate of clinical benefit (49% v 38%; P =.001). Survival data are currently immature and not reported here. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Letrozole was significantly superior to tamoxifen in TTP, TTF, ORR, and clinical benefit rate. Our results support its use as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.     

Approval summary: letrozole in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

Letrozole (Femara; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, NJ) is a nonsteroidal inhibitor of aromatase enzyme complex. It inhibits the peripheral conversion of circulating androgens to estrogens. In postmenopausal women, letrozole decreases plasma concentrations of estradiol, estrone, and estrone sulfate by 75-95% from baseline with maximal suppression achieved within 2-3 days of treatment initiation. Suppression is dose related, with doses of >or=0.5 mg giving estrone and estrone sulfate values that were often below assay detection limits. At clinically used dosage, letrozole does not impair adrenal synthesis of glucocorticoids or aldosterone. In 1998, letrozole was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women, with hormone receptor positive or unknown breast cancer, who had failed one prior antiestrogen treatment (i.e., for "second-line" treatment). Approval was based on two randomized trials comparing tumor RRs of patients receiving 0.5 mg of letrozole, 2.5 mg of letrozole, and either megestrol acetate (MA) or aminoglutethimide. In the megestrol trial, 2.5 mg/day letrozole was superior to 0.5 mg of letrozole and MA (RRs 24, 13, and 16%, respectively), whereas in the aminoglutethimide trial, there was no significant difference in 2.5 mg of letrozole and 0.5 mg of letrozole RRs (20 and 17%). There was a trend toward RR superiority of 2.5 mg of letrozole over aminoglutethimide (P = 0.06). Letrozole (2.5 mg) was the dose chosen for comparison with tamoxifen in the first-line setting. In July 2000, a marketing application for first-line letrozole treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive or hormone receptor unknown locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer was submitted to the FDA. A single double-blind, double dummy, randomized, and multicenter trial compared 2.5 mg of letrozole to 20 mg of tamoxifen (456 patients/arm). Letrozole was superior to tamoxifen with regard to time to progression (TTP) and objective response rate (RR). The median TTP for letrozole treatment was 9.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.1-12.2] versus 6.2 months (95% CI 5.8-8.5) for tamoxifen, P = 0.0001, hazard ratio 0.713, (95% CI 0.61-0.84). RR was 32% for letrozole versus 21% for tamoxifen (odds ratio 1.74, 95% CI 1.29-2.34, P = 0.0003). Preliminary survival data (survival data are still blinded) indicate that letrozole is unlikely to be worse than tamoxifen. Both treatments were similarly tolerated. On the basis of these results, the United States FDA approved letrozole tablets, 2.5 mg/day, for first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive or hormone receptor-unknown locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. The manufacturer made a commitment to provide updated information on survival.     

A comparison of the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Randomized clinical trials have established the role of third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane) as standard treatment for patients with hormone-sensitive metastatic breast cancer who have experienced disease progression with antiestrogen therapy. Significant gains in clinical efficacy and improved tolerability over progestins (megestrol acetate) and the first-generation AI aminoglutethimide have positioned these agents above previous therapies. Estrogen receptor (ER) status remains the best predictive determinant of endocrine response, and further randomized trials with properly selected patient populations may distinguish individual AIs within this class. A recently completed, randomized, head-to-head phase III trial of letrozole versus anastrozole as second-line endocrine therapy demonstrated a significant difference in objective response rate for letrozole compared with anastrozole (19% versus 12%, respectively; P = 0.014), with similar time to progression. The improved efficacy and safety of AIs as second-line endocrine therapies has spawned trials of their use as first-line endocrine therapy versus tamoxifen for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Based on favorable results from these trials, letrozole and anastrozole have also been approved for use as first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.     

Phase III study of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women: analysis of survival and update of efficacy from the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: To analyze overall survival (OS) and update efficacy data for letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter phase III trial randomly assigned 916 patients with hormone receptor-positive or unknown tumors letrozole 2.5 mg (n = 458) or tamoxifen 20 mg (n = 458) daily until disease progression. Optional cross-over was permitted at the treating physician's discretion. This report updates efficacy at a median follow-up of 32 months. RESULTS: The superiority of letrozole to tamoxifen was confirmed for time to progression (median, 9.4 v 6.0 months, respectively; P <.0001), time to treatment failure (median, 9 v 5.7 months, respectively; P <.0001), overall objective response rate (32% v 21%, respectively; P =.0002), and overall clinical benefit. Median OS was slightly prolonged for the randomized letrozole arm (34 v 30 months, respectively). Although this difference in OS is not significant, survival was improved in the randomized letrozole arm over the first 2 years of the study. Approximately one half of the patients in each arm crossed over. Total duration of endocrine therapy ("time to chemotherapy") was significantly longer (P =.005) for patients initially on letrozole (median, 16 months) than for patients initially on tamoxifen (median, 9 months). Time to worsening of Karnofsky performance score was significantly delayed with letrozole compared with tamoxifen (P =.001). CONCLUSION: This study documents the superiority of letrozole over tamoxifen in first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.     

DES-ja vu

Prior to the use of antiestrogens, high dose estrogen therapy was widely used as effective therapy for breast cancer. The introduction of antiestrogens with their reduced toxicity profile greatly minimized subsequent use of estrogen to treat metastatic breast cancer. We administered diethylstilbestrol (DES), a nonsteroidal synthetic estrogen, to eight postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who had been heavily pretreated with hormones and cytotoxic chemotherapy. We report on response rates and toxicities related to this form of hormonal therapy. Eight postmenopausal women aged 53 to 79 years with progressive metastatic breast cancer were treated. All had been pretreated with 3 to 6 hormonal agents including an antiestrogen, a progestin and an aromatase inhibitor; 6 of the 8 patients had received treatment with 2 or 3 combinations of cytotoxic agents. All patients received diethylstilbestrol 5 mg orally three times daily until evidence of disease progression or significant toxicity. Four women (50%) showed objective responses, two (25%) had stable disease and two (25%) had progressive disease. Measurable responses included a complete and partial response and two minor responses. The duration of the responses were 12, 11, 6, and 3 months. The hormone was well-tolerated. High-dose estrogen is effective and safe therapy for breast cancer patients even when they are heavily pretreated with prior chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. High dose estrogen could be re-introduced into this clinical setting as effective therapy with an acceptable toxicity profile.     

Letrozole, a new oral aromatase inhibitor: Randomised trial comparing 2.5 mg daily, 0.5 mg daily and aminoglutethimide in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer

Background: The study compares letrozole and aminoglutethimide (AG), astandard therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer,previously treated with anti-oestrogens.Patients and methods: 555 women were randomly assigned letrozole 2.5 mgonce daily (n = 185), letrozole 0.5 mg once daily (n = 192) oraminoglutethimide 250 mg twice daily with corticosteroid support (n = 178)in an open-label, multicentre trial. The primary endpoint was objectiveresponse rate (ORR), with time events as secondary. ORR was analysed ninemonths after enrolment of the last patient, while survival was analysed 15months after the last patient was enrolled. We report the results of theseanalyses plus an extended period of observation (covering a total durationof approximately 45 months) to determine the duration of response andclinical benefit.Results: Overall objective response rates (complete + partial) of19.5%, 16.7% and 12.4% were seen for letrozole 2.5 mg,0.5 mg and AG respectively. Median duration of response and stable diseasewas longest for letrozole 2.5 mg (21 months) compared with letrozole 0.5 mg(18 months) and AG (14 months). Letrozole 2.5 mg was superior to AG in timeto progression, time to treatment failure and overall survival.Treatment-related adverse events occurred in fewer patients on letrozole(33%) than on AG (46%). Transient nausea was the most frequentevent with letrozole (7% on 0.5 mg, 10% on 2.5 mg, 10%on AG), rash with AG (11%, 1% on 0.5 mg, 3% on 2.5 mgletrozole).Conclusions: Letrozole 2.5 mg offers longer disease control thanaminoglutethimide and letrozole 0.5 mg in the treatment of postmenopausalwomen with advanced breast cancer, previously treated with anti-oestrogens.     

Letrozole (Femara), a new aromatase inhibitor for advanced breast cancer]

The study compares letrozole (Femara and aminoglutethimide (AG), a standard therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, previously treated with anti-estrogens. 555 women were randomly assigned letrozole 2.5 mg once daily (n = 185), letrozole 0.5 mg once daily (n = 192) or aminoglutethimide 250 mg twice daily with corticosteroid support (n = 178) in an open-label, multicenter trial. The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR), with time events as secondary. ORR was analysed nine months after enrollment of the last patient, while survival was analysed 15 months after the last patients was enrolled. We report the results of these analyses plus an extended period of observation (covering a total duration of approximately 45 months) to determine the duration of response and clinical benefit. Overall objective response rates (complete + partial) of 19.5%, 16.7% and 12.4% were seen for letrozole 2.5 mg, 0.5 mg and AG respectively. Median duration of response and stable disease was longest for letrozole 2.5 mg (21 months) compared with letrozole 0.5 mg (18 months) and AG (14 months). Letrozole 2.5 mg was superior to AG in time to progression, time to treatment failure and overall survival. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in fewer patients on letrozole (33%) than on AG (46%). Letrozole 2.5 mg offers longer disease control than aminoglutethimide and letrozole 0.5 mg in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, previously treated with anti-estrogens.     

Applicability of the intratumor aromatase preclinical model to predict clinical trial results with endocrine therapy

Preclinical models and clinical studies have shown that aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are powerful inhibitors of estrogen synthesis and significantly suppress estrogen in vivo. For more than 20 years, standard first-line treatment for postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer has been the antiestrogen tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) with differential effects on breast, endometrial, bone, and vascular tissues. The estrogenic activity of tamoxifen is associated with deleterious clinical side effects, including vaginal bleeding, endometrial cancer, and thromboembolism. AIs are established second-line treatments in patients who progress with tamoxifen. Compared with progestins, such as megestrol acetate, or the earlier AIs aminoglutethimide and fadrozole, the new AIs, including exemestane, anastrozole, and letrozole, have increased efficacy and clinical benefit and cause fewer side effects in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Letrozole and anastrozole are approved first-line therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer and as second-line treatment after tamoxifen failure. Studies in the intratumoral aromatase xenograft preclinical model have shown better responses with AIs than with antiestrogens in first-line therapy, and these data are consistent with the results from clinical trials. This model is now being used to assess whether combined or sequential administration of AIs with other agents may provide additional benefit.     

A phase II, randomized, blinded study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib combined with letrozole in the treatment of advanced breast cancer after antiestrogen therapy

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the clinical efficacy of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor, tipifarnib, combined with letrozole in patients with advanced breast cancer and disease progression following antiestrogen therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women with estrogen-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer that had progressed after tamoxifen were given 2.5 mg letrozole once daily and were randomly assigned (2:1) to tipifarnib 300 mg (TL) or placebo (L) twice daily for 21 consecutive days in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. RESULTS: Of 120 patients treated with TL (n = 80) or L (n = 40), 113 were evaluable for response. Objective response rate was 30% (95% CI; 20-41%) for TL and 38% (95% CI; 23-55%) for L. There was no significant difference in response duration, time to disease progression or survival. Clinical benefit rates were 49% (TL) and 62% (L). Tipifarnib was generally well tolerated; a higher incidence of drug-related asymptomatic grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed for TL (18%) than for L (0%). Tipifarnib population pharmacokinetics were similar to previous studies, with no significant difference in trough letrozole concentrations between the TL and L groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adding tipifarnib to letrozole did not improve objective response rate in this population of patients with advanced breast cancer.     

Megestrol acetate: Phase II study of a single daily administration in advanced breast cancer

Summary A new formulation of megestrol acetate, a semisynthetic oral progestin used in the hormonal treatment of breast cancer, allows the administration of 160 mg of the drug in a single daily dose. Sixty-nine postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer have been treated with this regimen: five patients received megestrol acetate as first-line treatment of their metastatic disease, while all the others had been previously treated with one or more regimens of chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy. The median duration of the treatment for evaluable patients was 3 months (range 1–13+). Among 65 evaluable patients 2 complete responses and 12 partial responses (objective response rate 21.5%; 95% confidence limits 12.31%–33.49%) were observed. Median duration of response was 7 months (range 2–12+). Responses were observed both in visceral and in non-visceral sites of disease. Twenty-nine patients obtained a stabilization of disease (44.7%), and twenty-two progressed (33.8%). Median duration of stabilization was 4 months (range 3–13+). Median survival for all patients from the start of megestrol acetate was 9 months (range 1–22+). The most common side effect of therapy was weight gain, occurring in 36% of patients. Megestrol acetate on a single-daily-dose schedule can be considered as an interesting hormonal treatment for advanced breast cancer, especially in the clinical instance of patients who, after having obtained a remission or stabilization of disease with tamoxifen, need further palliative treatment.     

Exemestane is superior to megestrol acetate after tamoxifen failure in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III randomized double-blind trial. The Exemestane Study Group.

PURPOSE: This phase III, double-blind, randomized, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy, pharmacodynamics, and safety of the oral aromatase inactivator exemestane (EXE) versus megestrol acetate (MA) in postmenopausal women with progressive advanced breast cancer who experienced failure of tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 769 patients were randomized to EXE 25 mg/d (n = 366) or MA (n = 403) 40 mg four times daily. Tumor response, duration of tumor control, tumor-related signs and symptoms (TRSS), quality of life (QOL), survival, and tolerability were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall objective response (OR) rates were higher in patients treated with EXE than in those treated with MA (15.0% v 12.4%); a similar trend was noted in patients with visceral metastases (13.5% v 10.5%). Median survival time was significantly longer with EXE (median not reached) than with MA (123.4 weeks; P =.039), as were the median duration of overall success (OR or stable disease > or = 24 weeks; 60.1 v 49.1 weeks; P =.025), time to tumor progression (20.3 v 16.6 weeks; P =.037), and time to treatment failure (16.3 v 15.7 weeks; P =.042). Compared with MA, there were similar or greater improvements in pain, TRSS, and QOL with EXE. Both drugs were well tolerated. Grade 3 or 4 weight changes were more common with MA (17.1% v 7.6%; P =.001). CONCLUSION: EXE prolongs survival time, time to tumor progression, and time to treatment failure compared with MA and offers a well-tolerated treatment option for postmenopausal women with progressive advanced breast cancer who experienced failure of tamoxifen.     

Additive antitumor effect of aromatase inhibitor letrozole and antiestrogen fulvestrant in a postmenopausal breast cancer model

Blocking estrogen receptors with antiestrogens and blocking estrogen synthesis with aromatase inhibitors are two strategies currently being used for reducing the effect of estrogen in postmenopausal estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients. To optimize these treatment strategies, we have investigated whether tumor progression can be delayed by combining the pure antiestrogen fulvestrant with the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole. These studies were done in ovariectomized, athymic mice bearing tumors of estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer cells stably transfected with the aromatase gene (MCF-7Ca). Groups of mice with equivalent tumor volumes were injected s.c. daily with vehicle (control; n = 6), fulvestrant (1 mg/d; n = 7), letrozole (10 microg/d; n = 18), or letrozole (10 microg/d) plus fulvestrant (1 mg/d; n = 5). All treatments were effective in suppressing tumor growth compared with controls (P < 0.001). Tumor volumes of the fulvestrant-treated group had doubled in 10 weeks. After 19 weeks of letrozole (10 microg/d) treatment when tumors had nearly doubled in volume, mice (n = 18) were assigned to second-line therapy with letrozole (100 microg/d; n = 6), tamoxifen (100 microg/d; n = 6), or remained on letrozole treatment (10 microg/d; n = 6). However, tumors continued to increase in volume in these groups. Tumors of animals treated with the combination of letrozole plus Faslodex regressed over 29 weeks of treatment by 45%. Thus, the combination of letrozole plus fulvestrant was more effective in suppressing tumor growth than either letrozole or fulvestrant alone or sequential therapies with tamoxifen or a higher dose of letrozole (100 microg/d).     

Advances in endocrine treatments for postmenopausal women with metastatic and early breast cancer

For the past 25 years, the estrogen antagonist tamoxifen has been the hormonal treatment of choice for postmenopausal patients with hormone-sensitive metastatic and early breast cancer (EBC). However, tamoxifen is associated with certain tolerability and safety concerns. In addition, the hormonal options after progression are limited, and thus, alternative endocrine treatments have been developed. This review provides a synopsis of the newer alternatives in endocrine therapy of breast cancer: the aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and fulvestrant Faslodex), the estrogen receptor antagonist that downregulates estrogen and progesterone receptors and has no known agonist activity. The third-generation AIs, anastrozole and letrozole, have been shown to be as effective or more effective than megestrol acetate and tamoxifen as second- and first-line therapies for the treatment of postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer, and exemestane has been approved for second-line use. Fulvestrant has been shown to be as effective as anastrozole as second-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer and has been approved in the U.S. for the treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer following progression on antiestrogen therapy. Anastrozole is the only AI with published clinical trial data and U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for adjuvant therapy of postmenopausal women with EBC. The 'Arimidex,' Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial, a double-blind, multicenter trial with 9,366 patients, compared tamoxifen with anastrozole, alone and in combination, as adjuvant endocrine treatment for postmenopausal patients with operable, invasive, EBC. The first analysis (at a median follow-up of 33.3 months) showed longer disease-free survival and, in general, better tolerability with anastrozole than with tamoxifen. This pattern was maintained at later analyses with a median follow-up of 47 months for efficacy and 37 months for safety and tolerability. Although longer follow-up is warranted, anastrozole appears to be a well-documented choice of endocrine adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive breast cancer.     

Role of anti-aromatase agents in postmenopausal advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE: Endocrine therapy is a well-recognized approach to the treatment of postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer, particularly those with estrogen receptor-positive tumors. The availability of anti-aromatase agents, both reversible (nonsteroidal) and irreversible (steroidal), provides clinicians with additional hormonal treatment options. METHODS: A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify studies that evaluated anti-aromatase therapy in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. In selecting studies, priority was given to randomized, controlled trials. RESULTS: Tamoxifen is the standard first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer. However, recent results have demonstrated the efficacy of newer anti-aromatase agents in this setting. Among patients who have progressed after tamoxifen therapy, anti-aromatase agents have emerged as first choice therapy based on their better tolerability and improved efficacy compared with megestrol acetate. Exemestane and anastrozole (irreversible and reversible anti-aromatase agents, respectively) have demonstrated survival benefits over megestrol acetate in second-line therapy. Anti-aromatase agents have also demonstrated efficacy in patients who have failed multiple hormonal therapies. Based on these data, an algorithm for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer is proposed. CONCLUSIONS: The enhanced tolerability and superior efficacy of anti-aromatase inhibitors compared with megestrol acetate has resulted in these agents becoming the endocrine treatment of choice for women with advanced breast cancer who have progressed after tamoxifen treatment. The increased use of tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting and the demonstrated activity of aromatase inhibitors in first-line therapy will further increase the role of these agents.     

Intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone versus oral megestrol for the control of postmenopausal hot flashes in breast cancer patients: a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Hot flashes are frequent in postmenopausal breast cancer patients, especially when treated with tamoxifen. Estrogen replacement therapy is the most effective treatment for hot flashes, but its use is controversial in breast cancer survivors. Progestins may offer a good alternative for the control of hot flashes in this setting; in particular, oral megestrol acetate has been proven effective in a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. With the aim of further improving these results, we have designed a randomized study comparing oral megestrol acetate with depot intramuscular (i.m.) medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) for the control of hot flashes in postmenopausal patients with a history of breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-one postmenopausal patients were randomized to receive an i.m. injection of depot MPA 500 mg on days 1, 14 and 28, or oral megestrol acetate 40 mg daily for 6 weeks. Patients recorded daily the number and severity of their hot flashes; response was defined as a > or =50% decrease in the number and severity of hot flashes. RESULTS: At week 6, hot flashes were reduced by 86% on average in the whole group of patients, without significant differences between the two progestins. Response was obtained by 75 and 67% of patients receiving MPA or megestrol, respectively (P = 0.5). Responders were followed to assess maintenance of response (without further treatment), which was significantly better with i.m. MPA: in this group, 89% of responders still showed a benefit at week 24, compared with 45% in the megestrol group (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that a short cycle of i.m. depot MPA injections provides significant and long-lasting relief from postmenopausal hot flashes in patients with a history of breast cancer, offering an alternative to estrogen replacement therapy or prolonged administration of oral megestrol.     

Superiority of letrozole to tamoxifen in the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer: evidence from metastatic subgroups and a test of functional ability

PURPOSE: The letrozole study 025 is a large (n = 907), international, double-blind, randomized, phase III trial in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. This subanalysis compares the efficacies of letrozole and tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausual women with advanced breast cancer according to site of metastatic lesions and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine hundred seven patients with advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned to once-daily oral letrozole (2.5 mg; Femara; Novartis Pharma AG; Basel, Switzerland) or tamoxifen (20 mg; Tamofen; Leiras OY; Turku, Finland). Time to progression (TTP) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Treatments were compared by Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Letrozole treatment significantly prolonged TTP in all subsets of patients: those with nonvisceral metastases, those with visceral metastases without liver involvement, and those with liver metastases. The reduction in risk of progression ranged from 25%, for patients with nonvisceral metastases, to 36%, for patients with liver metastases. The distributions of baseline KPS scores for both treatment groups were similar (57% had KPS scores >/=90). Time to worsening of 20 points or more in KPS score was significantly longer with letrozole than with tamoxifen, but modest numbers of patients experienced such deterioration (letrozole, 20%, tamoxifen, 22%, in patients without visceral metastases; 23%-24% in patients with liver metastases; and letrozole, 14%, tamoxifen, 30%, in patients with visceral metastases without liver involvement). CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the consistent superiority of letrozole over tamoxifen and support the use of letrozole as a new standard of endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.     

Hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer

The treatment of postmenopausal women with breast cancer presents a number of challenges. Tamoxifen has had a substantial impact on mortality in women with early-stage, estrogen-receptor-positive tumors. Despite the improvement in the treatment of breast cancer, many patients will ultimately experience a recurrence. Present treatment approaches can provide effective palliation in the advanced disease setting, but, at best, there has been a modest impact on survival. Numerous options are now available to provide effective palliation for patients with advanced disease. These options include antiestrogens, pure antiestrogens, aromatase inhibitors and progestins and LHRH agonists. Recently, several studies have reviewed the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors as first-line agents in postmenopausal women. Anastrozole and letrozole have recently been approved as first-line agents in women with metastatic breast cancer. In addition to their role in metastatic breast, trials investigating the potential of aromatase inhibitors in the early breast cancer, both in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting are underway.     

Role of fulvestrant in sequential hormonal therapy for advanced, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women

The introduction of antiendocrine agents with differing mechanisms of action now mandates the design of rational sequential hormonal regimens for breast cancer. The aromatase inhibitors (AIs), including the nonsteroidal compounds anastrozole and letrozole and the steroidal compound exemestane, are important alternatives or adjuncts to the antiestrogen agent tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in the first-line management of advanced disease and in the adjuvant treatment of early-stage disease. These and other endocrine agents, including the newer estrogen receptor antagonist fulvestrant and also tamoxifen itself, have not been extensively evaluated within the context of hormonal sequencing. Based on a retrospective analysis of data from 3 phase III trials, patients treated with fulvestrant in the first- or second-line hormonal management of advanced breast cancer may derive further clinical benefit from subsequent treatment with an endocrine agent from another class. The need for prospective investigation of post-AI hormonal therapy is intensifying as a result of the increasing clinical use of the AIs. Sophisticated sequencing regimens designed to exploit different mechanisms of action have the potential to confer greater clinical benefit than the historical approach of selecting the agent with the next highest single-agent clinical activity upon disease progression.     

氟维司群治疗绝经后激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌的研究进展

以阻断雌激素作用通路为目的的内分泌治疗是晚期乳腺癌的一线治疗选择之一。氟维司群作为雌激素拮抗剂,可通过阻断并降解雌激素受体起作用。目前,临床上使用氟维司群每月250 mg作为一线内分泌治疗后疾病进展或复发的绝经后激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌的二线治疗方案。相比之下,氟维司群每月500 mg可获得更好的疗效,且不增加新的安全性问题。目前对于氟维司群的研究更多地集中在一线治疗以及与其他药物联用来治疗晚期乳腺癌。该文对氟维司群在激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌中的研究进展进行了综述。