Comparison of event rates and survival in patients with unexplained syncope without documented ventricular tachyarrhythmias versus patients with documented sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias both treated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Patients with unexplained syncope and inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias during electrophysiologic testing have an increased cardiac mortality rate. We compared event rates and survival of 178 patients with unexplained syncope and no documented ventricular arrhythmias (syncope group) versus 568 patients with documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT or fibrillation (VF) (VT/VF group) treated, as part of a lead (Ventritex TVL) investigation, with similar implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) capable of extensive data storage. The 2 groups shared similar clinical characteristics. The mean follow-up was 11 months for the syncope group and 14 months for the VT/VF group. The mean time from device implantation to first appropriate therapy was similar in the 2 groups (109 +/- 140 vs 93 +/- 131 days, p = 0.40). Actuarial probability of appropriate ICD therapy was 49% and 55% at 1 and 2 years, respectively, in syncope group and 49% and 58% in VT/VF group (p = 0.57). Recurrent syncope was associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmias in 85% and 92% of the syncope group and VT/VF group, respectively (p = 0.54). At 2 years, actuarial survival was 91% in the syncope group and 93% in VT/VF group (p = 0.85). We conclude that patients treated with ICD with unexplained syncope and induced VT/VF have an equally high incidence of appropriate ICD therapy and low mortality compared with similar patients with documented VT/VF. These findings, plus the high association between recurrent syncope and ventricular arrhythmias, indicate that VT/VF are likely etiologies in selected patients with unexplained syncope and support ICD therapy in such cases.     

Follow-up of patients with unexplained syncope and inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias: analysis of the AVID registry and an AVID substudy. Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators

INTRODUCTION: A prospective registry and substudy were conducted in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Study to clarify the prognosis and recurrent event rate, risk factors, and impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with unexplained syncope, structural heart disease, and inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: Included in the AVID registry were patients from all participating sites who had "out of hospital syncope with structural heart disease and EP-inducible VT/VF with symptoms." In addition, 13 collaborating sites provided more in-depth clinical and electrophysiologic data as part of a formal prospective substudy. Patients in the substudy were followed by local investigators for recurrent arrhythmic events and mortality. Registry patients were tracked for fatal outcomes by the National Death Index. A total of 429 patients with syncope were entered in the AVID registry, of whom 80 participated in the substudy. Of the substudy patients, 21 patients (26%) had inducible polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF), 11 patients (14%) had sustained monomorphic VT <200 beats/min, and 48 patients (60%) had sustained monomorphic VT > or = 200 beats/min. The ICD was used as sole therapy in 75% of the syncope substudy patients (and with antiarrhythmic drug in an additional 9%) and in 59% of the syncope registry patients. Survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 93% and 74% for the substudy patients and 90% and 74% for the registry patients, respectively. Survival of the syncope substudy patients (predominantly treated by ICD) was similar to the VT patients treated by ICD and superior to the VT patients treated by an antiarrhythmic drug (P = 0.05) in the randomized main trial. Mortality events in the substudy were marginally predicted by ejection fraction (P = 0.06) but not by electrophysiologic study-induced arrhythmia. The significant predictor of increased mortality in the registry was age (P = 0.003) and of reduced mortality was treatment with ICD (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The results of these analyses support the role of the ICD as primary antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with unexplained syncope, structural heart disease, and inducible VT/VF at electrophysiologic study.     

Suppression of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: a comparison of d,l-sotalol with no antiarrhythmic drug treatment

Objectives. This study evaluates the clinical efficacy of d,l-sotalol in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias.Background. D,l-sotalol is an important antiarrhythmic agent to prevent recurrences of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT/VF). However, evidence is lacking that an antiarrhythmic agent like d,l-sotalol can reduce the incidence of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in comparison to no antiarrhythmic drug treatment.Methods. A prospective study was performed in 146 consecutive patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. In 53 patients, oral d,l-sotalol prevented induction of VT/VF during electrophysiological testing and patients were discharged on oral d,l-sotalol (sotalol group). In 93 patients, VT/VF remained inducible and a defibrillator (ICD) was implanted. After implantation of the device patients were randomly assigned to oral treatment with d,l-sotalol (ICD/sotalol group, n = 46) or no antiarrhythmic medication (n = 47, ICD-only group).Results. During follow-up, 25 patients (53.2%) in the ICD-only group had a VT/VF recurrence in comparison to 15 patients (28.3%) in the sotalol group and 15 patients (32.6%) in the ICD/sotalol group (p = 0.0013). Therapy with d,l-sotalol, amiodarone or metoprolol was instituted in 12 patients (25.5%) of the ICD-only group due to frequent VT/VF recurrences or symptomatic supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. In nine patients, 17% of the sotalol group, an ICD was implanted after VT/VF recurrence, three patients (5.7%) received amiodarone. Total mortality was not different between the three groups.Conclusions. D,l-sotalol significantly reduces the incidence of recurrences of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in comparison to no antiarrhythmic drug treatment.     

Spontaneous sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias during treatment with type IA antiarrhythmic agents

Twenty-six patients who developed their first clinical episode of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) while taking type IA antiarrhythmic agents for more benign rhythm disturbances were rechallenged with the identical drug during electrophysiologic testing. Patients with these new drug-associated spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias often manifested a preexisting substrate for such arrhythmias: sustained VT or VF was induced in 65% of patients at baseline, and in 58% of patients when tested with their previously taken antiarrhythmic drug. Among those without inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias in the drug-free state, 78% remained free of inducible sustained arrhythmias when tested with the same drug they had been taking at the time of the clinical arrhythmia. Even patients without a definable electrophysiologic substrate for sustained VT or VF remained at risk for arrhythmia recurrence if treated with alternative antiarrhythmic medications: 40% of such patients who continued to receive an antiarrhythmic agent different from that being administered when their clinical VT or VF occurred had recurrent spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias during follow-up. Thus, patients with drug-associated clinical sustained ventricular tachycardias form a heterogenous group that should be evaluated individually and not empirically managed for a "proarrhythmic effect" simply by antiarrhythmic drug withdrawal or drug substitution.     

Outcome of patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and unexplained syncope treated with an implantable defibrillator

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, unexplained syncope and a negative electrophysiology test who are treated with an implantable defibrillator.

BACKGROUND

Patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and unexplained syncope may be at high risk for sudden cardiac death, and they are sometimes treated with an implantable defibrillator.

METHODS

This study prospectively determined the outcome of 14 consecutive patients who had a nonischemic cardiomyopathy, unexplained syncope and a negative electrophysiology test and who underwent defibrillator implantation (Syncope Group). Nineteen consecutive patients with a nonischemic cardiomyopathy and a cardiac arrest who were treated with a defibrillator (Arrest Group) served as a control group.

RESULTS

Seven of 14 patients (50%) in the Syncope Group received appropriate shocks for ventricular arrhythmias during a mean follow-up of 24 ± 13 months, compared with 8 of 19 patients (42%) in the Arrest Group during a mean follow-up of 45 ± 40 months (p = 0.1). The mean duration from device implantation until the first appropriate shock was 32 ± 7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18 to 45 months) in the Syncope Group compared to 72 ± 12 months (95% CI, 48 to 96 months) in the Arrest Group (p = 0.1). Among patients who received appropriate shocks, the mean time from defibrillator implantation to the first appropriate shock was 10 ± 14 months in the Syncope Group, compared with 48 ± 47 months in the Arrest Group (p = 0.06). Recurrent syncope was always associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS

The high incidence of appropriate defibrillator shocks and the association of recurrent syncope with ventricular arrhythmias support the treatment of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, unexplained syncope and a negative electrophysiology test with an implantable defibrillator.     

Clinical and electrophysiologic predictors of ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrence in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

INTRODUCTION: Not all patients experience recurrent sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias after placement of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). We evaluated the clinical and electrophysiologic predictors of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) recurrence following ICD implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients (n = 133) underwent 4 +/- 3 serial electrophysiologic studies (EPS) over 50 +/- 26 months following ICD implantation. Sustained VT/VF could always be induced during follow-up EPS in 49 patients; sustained VT/VF was sometimes induced during follow-up EPS in 47 patients; and sustained VT/VF could never be induced during follow-up EPS in 37 patients. Spontaneous VT/VF requiring ICD therapy occurred in 107 patients during follow-up. Patients with sustained VT/VF that was always inducible or sometimes inducible during follow-up experienced more frequent episodes of VT/VF following ICD implant (20.5, 95% CI 12.7-33.0; and 17.8, 95% CI 11.3-28.1 episodes/patient respectively; vs 3.0, 95% CI 2.0-4.6 episodes/patient for patients with VT/VF never induced, P < 0.001). Inducibility of sustained VT/VF post-ICD implant (P < 0.001) and sustained VT as the presenting arrhythmia (P = 0.02) were independent predictors of spontaneous VT/VF recurrence. CONCLUSION: Reproducibly inducible VT/VF following ICD implantation predicts a high probability of VT/VF recurrence and identifies a cohort of patients who experience frequent episodes of VT/VF over time. Persistent noninducibility of sustained VT/VF identifies a group of patients who experience no or very few episodes of VT/VF recurrence.     

Transmural dispersion of repolarization and ventricular tachyarrhythmias

BACKGROUND: Myocardial transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) has been associated with reentrant arrhythmias in animal studies but a clinical association has not yet to been demonstrated. The present study examines the relationship between TDR and ventricular tachyarrhythmias in human subjects. METHODS: This study consisted of 65 patients with non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation or unexplained syncope with organic heart disease. The control group included 65 patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. The 12 ECG was recorded at a recording rate of 100 mm/sec. The interval from the peak to the end of the T wave in the precordial (ECG), referred to as TpTe was assumed to be representative of TDR. RESULTS: Patients were divided into three groups based on the ability to induce VT at the time of electrophysiologic study: VT inducible group (n=37), VT non-inducible group (n=25) and control group (n=65). V4 TpTe/ radical RR was significantly prolonged in the VT inducible group, as compared to the VT non-inducible group (n=25) and the control group (118.9 +/- 26.1 vs. 103.9 +/- 25.7, 104.1 +/- 22.6 ms, P<.05). Patients who develop VT spontaneously (n=13) during a mean follow-up period of 25 months, displayed significantly prolonged V3 TpTe/ radical RR, compared to patients who did not develop VT spontaneously or the control group (132.5 +/- 37.4 vs. 109.8 +/- 26.3, 107.1 +/- 24.1 ms, P <.05). CONCLUSION: Prolonged TDR is associated with inducibility as well as spontaneous development of VT in higher risk patients. TDR may be a useful index for predicting ventricular tachyarrhythmias.     

Low recurrence of syncope in patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

AIMS: To determine the effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in preventing recurrence of syncope in patients with structural heart disease, previously unexplained syncope and inducible ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with syncope, structural heart disease and inducible arrhythmias had an ICD implanted. All ICDs delivered antitachycardia pacing and shocks of adjusted energy. Detection and therapy were programmed according to uniform criteria. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 63+/-11 years and most of them were male (36/38). After a mean follow-up of 28+/-15 (4-61) months, six patients died and one underwent heart transplantation. Syncope recurred in three patients, but in none of them was it caused by an arrhythmic event. In 18 patients, 113 episodes of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation were detected and appropriately treated by the ICD. The mean time from implant until first appropriate therapy was 18+/-14 months. The actuarial probability of receiving appropriate therapy was 20% and 42% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unexplained syncope, structural heart disease and inducible arrhythmias, ICD prevents syncope associated with arrhythmic events. Frequent effective use of antitachycardia pacing and shocks of adjusted energy seem essential to this aim.     

Obesity as a risk factor for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in MADIT II patients

Background: Obesity, as defined by body mass index ≥30 kg/m², has been shown to be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, data on the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and the risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden death by BMI in patients after myocardial infarction with severe left ventricular dysfunction.
Methods : The risk of appropriate defibrillator therapy for ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) by BMI status was analyzed in 476 nondiabetic patients with left ventricular dysfunction who received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-II (MADIT II).
Results : Mean BMI was 27 ± 5 kg/m². Obese patients comprised 25% of the study population. After 2 years of follow-up, the cumulative rates of appropriate ICD therapy for VT/VF were 39% in obese and 24% in nonobese patients, respectively (P = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, there was a significant 64% increase in the risk for appropriate ICD therapy among obese patients as compared with nonobese patients, which was attributed mainly to an 86% increase in the risk of appropriate ICD shocks (P = 0.006). Consistent with these results, the risk of the combined endpoint of appropriate VT/VF therapy or sudden cardiac death (SCD) was also significantly increased among obese patients (Hazard Ratio 1.59; P = 0.01).
Conclusions : Our findings suggest that in nondiabetic patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction, a BMI ≥30 kg/m² is an independent risk factor for ventricular tachyarrhythmias.     

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

Ventricular arrhythmias remain a major cause of cardiovascular mortality. Therapy for serious ventricular arrhythmias has evolved over the past decade, from treatment primarily with antiarrhythmic drugs to implanted devices. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the best therapy for patients who have experienced an episode of ventricular fibrillation not accompanied by an acute myocardial infarction or other transient or reversible cause. It is also superior therapy in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) causing syncope or hemodynamic compromise. Controlled clinical trials have confirmed the utility of these devices. As primary prevention, the ICD is superior to conventional antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients who have survived a myocardial infarction and who have spontaneous, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, a low ejection fraction, inducible VT at electrophysiologic study, and whose VT is not suppressed by procainamide. The effect of the ICD on survival of other patient populations remains to be proven. The device is costly, but its price is generally accepted to be reasonable. The ICD has been a major advance in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias.     

Limited clinical utility of endomyocardial biopsy in patients presenting with ventricular tachycardia without apparent structural heart disease.

To determine the cardiac pathology underlying ventricular tachyarrhythmias, endomyocardial biopsy was performed in 14 patients, 10 men and 4 women, with a mean age of 40 years (range 17-63) and no apparent structural heart disease, presenting with high-density symptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (n = 4), sustained VT (n = 6), and ventricular fibrillation (n = 4). The absence of coronary or valvular heart disease was documented by cardiac catheterization. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 56 +/- 10%. Noninvasive assessment of the ventricular arrhythmia was made in all patients with Holter monitoring and/or exercise testing, while invasive evaluation with programmed electrical stimulation was performed in 13 patients. Biopsy findings included subendocardial and interstitial fibrosis in 7 patients, and monocytes containing periodic acid Schiff (PAS) positive vacuoles in 1 patient; biopsy was normal in 6 patients. There was no relationship between the presence or absence of pathologic abnormalities on biopsy and left ventricular ejection fraction, presenting or induced arrhythmias, or prognosis. Pathologic evidence supporting a specific treatable diagnosis was not present in any biopsy. Drugs to suppress spontaneous (3 patients) or induced (8 patients) VT were instituted, while 2 patients were not treated. In 1 patient who was resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest an automatic defibrillator was implanted. In 24.6 months of mean follow-up there was 1 nonfatal arrhythmia recurrence, 1 noncardiac death, and 1 sudden death in a patient with fibrosis on biopsy, an ejection fraction of 45%, and both inducible and spontaneous sustained VT suppressed with an antiarrhythmic agent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease: role of electrophysiologic study

Sixty-two consecutive patients with chronic coronary artery disease referred for evaluation of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) underwent electrophysiologic studies. Sustained VT was induced by one to three ventricular extrastimuli in 28 patients (45%). Therapy was guided by the results of electrophysiologic testing in 44 patients: 19 patients without inducible sustained VT received no antiarrhythmic therapy, and 25 patients with inducible sustained or symptomatic nonsustained VT received therapy guided by the results of electrophysiologic studies. The results of electrophysiologic studies were ignored by physicians for a second group of 18 patients: four had inducible sustained VT but received no antiarrhythmic therapy, and 14 had inducible sustained or nonsustained VT and received antiarrhythmic therapy not guided by results of electrophysiologic testing. After a mean follow-up period of 28 months, 11 patients had died suddenly. Seven of the 11 patients who died suddenly had inducible sustained VT. Three of 44 patients in the group receiving therapy guided by electrophysiologic studies died suddenly versus eight of 18 in the group receiving therapy not guided by electrophysiologic studies (p = .001). Only one of 19 patients without inducible sustained VT who were not treated experienced sudden death. Two of four patients with inducible sustained VT who did not receive antiarrhythmic therapy died suddenly. Multivariate analysis of the relationship of induced arrhythmias, left ventricular ejection fraction, site of myocardial infarction, history of syncope, or type of antiarrhythmic therapy to outcome revealed a greater than twofold increased risk for sudden cardiac death in patients whose therapy was not guided by results of electrophysiologic study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Spontaneous Variability of Ventricular Ectopic Activity in Patients with Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia and in Survivors of Cardiac Arrest

Background: Spontaneous variability of ventricular arrhythmia has been described in patients with chronic stable ventricular arrhythmias and in patients with chronic heart failure. However, no data are available on spontaneous variability in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Thus, the present study was designed to prospectively determine the extent of spontaneous variability of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and in survivors of cardiac arrest. Methods: Ventricular arrhythmia variability was determined in 470 patients (413 men, 57 women), age (mean ± SD) 64.6 ± 9.5 years with documented ventricular tachycardia (VT), cardiac arrest, or syncope who were prospectively enrolled in a randomized trial of the comparison of electrophysiological testing with Holter monitoring to predict antiarrhythmic drug efficacy. Coronary artery disease was present in 398 (85%) patients, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.32 ± 0.13. They underwent two 24-hour ambulatory recordings separated by 1 day. Spontaneous variability was determined for total premature ventricular complexes (PVCs), pairs, and VT events. Results: Arithmetic mean of hourly total PVCs on day 1 was 315 ± 425. The 95% confidence limit of spontaneous reduction in total PVC count was 71%. Corresponding values for pairs, VT events of 3–15 beats, < 15 beats, or < 15 seconds were 72%, 80%, 94%, and 95%, respectively. The percentage increases in total PVCs, pairs, and VT events 3–15 beats, < 15 beats, and < 15 seconds were 243%, 259%, 397%, 1553%, and 1756%, respectively. The percentage reduction required to show a true drug effect was 63% for patients with an ejection fraction > 0.32 and 76% for those with an ejection fraction ltm 0.32 (P = 0.024). Patients who presented with unmonitored syncope showed less spontaneous variability than either patients with documented, sustained VT or cardiac arrest. Conclusions: Marked spontaneous variability of ventricular arrhythmias is observed in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Variability is affected by the degree of left ventricular dysfunction. The lowest variability was observed in patients presenting with unmonitored syncope. Thus, large changes in arrhythmia frequency must be observed in this population, as in others, to be ascribed to drug effect.     

Role of programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and documented sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: inducibility and prognostic value in 102 patients

The role of programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) in patientsat high risk of sudden death related to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy(DCM) is still controversial The possible reason is that moststudy series have been too small or that only a few patientshad documented sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. This study therefore, looked at PVS performed in 102 patientswith DCM and documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT;n=63) or ventricular fibrillation (VF; n=39). Sustained VT wasinduced in 27 of 63 patients (43%) with documented sustainedVT and in 14 of 39 patients (36%) with documented VF (ns). VFwas induced in nine patients (14%) with a history of sustainedVT and in seven (18%) with a history of VF (ns). At a mean follow-upof 32±15 months, sudden death occurred in 14 (14%) patients,a rate similar in both patients with documented VT and VF (ns).Incidence of sudden death at 36 months was 6% in patients withinducible sustained VT/VF compared to 29% in patients withoutinducible VT/VF (P<0·05) A favourable drug regimen(response to drug and no intolerable side effects) was obtainedby serial drug testing in 25 of all 102 patients (25%). A cardioverterdefibrillator (ICD) was implanted in 32 patients, in 63% ofwhom discharges were observed during 18±11 months offollow-up; only one patient (3%) died suddenly. Thus, in patients with DCM, there was no relationship betweendocumented and inducible ventricular tachzyarrhythmias, andinitiation of sustained VT or VF had little prognostic valuefor the prediction of subsequent sudden death. Wherever antiarrhythmic drug therapy was of limited value, implantationof an ICD may improve the prognosis of these high risk patients.     

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator discharge rates in patients with unexplained syncope, structural heart disease, and inducible ventricular tachycardia at electrophysiologic study

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is the best available strategy to protect patients from life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia. Although unproven, it is commonly utilized to treat subjects with syncope, a negative clinical workup, structural heart disease, and inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) on programmed electrophysiologic stimulation (EPS). The purpose of this paper was to validate this approach. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 36 subjects who received primary ICD therapy for syncope in the setting of structural heart disease with inducible sustained monomorphic VT on EPS. The cohort was predominantly male (32/36) with underlying coronary artery disease (29/36). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 31 +/- 12%, and a third of the patients (12/36) had undergone bypass surgery. RESULTS: The study group was followed for a mean of 23 +/- 15 months (range 3-81 months) and experienced an ICD event rate of 22% at 3 months, which increased to 55% at 36 months. This event rate was comparable with the 66% event rate seen in a group of patients with primary ICD therapy for spontaneous life-threatening VT treated during the same time period. No future predictors of ICD events in the study group could be identified. CONCLUSION: Syncope patients with negative workup, structural heart disease, and sustained monomorphic VT at EPS are at high risk for future tachyarrhythmic events. Based on present evidence, primary ICD therapy in this group appears warranted and justified.     

Electrophysiologic response to moricizine in patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the short-term efficacy and safety of moricizine in patients receiving electrophysiologically guided therapy for sustained ventricular arrhythmias refractory to treatment with class IA antiarrhythmic agents. DESIGN: Uncontrolled clinical trial. SETTING: Referral-based teaching medical center. PATIENTS: Twenty-one patients (18 of whom had coronary artery disease) with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 32% +/- 11% who presented with sustained ventricular tachycardia (13 patients), syncope (4 patients), or cardiac arrest (4 patients). INTERVENTIONS: Moricizine, 743 +/- 85 mg daily. MEASUREMENTS: Electrophysiologic testing in the drug-free state and after administration of moricizine unless sustained arrhythmias occurred. MAIN RESULTS: Sustained ventricular tachycardia was inducible in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs in 20 patients and was not suppressed by moricizine in any patient. Four patients had six episodes of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia while receiving moricizine. A probable proarrhythmic response occurred in four patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with compromised left ventricular function caused by coronary artery disease in whom class IA antiarrhythmics were ineffective, moricizine was ineffective in suppressing sustained ventricular arrhythmias and resulted in proarrhythmic effects in some patients.     

Usefulness of programmed ventricular stimulation in predicting future arrhythmic events in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis

The utility of programmed ventricular stimulation to predict future arrhythmic events in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis is unknown. Similarly, the long-term benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in cardiac sarcoidosis has not been established. Thirty-two consecutive patients with cardiac sarcoidosis underwent programmed ventricular stimulation. Patients with spontaneous or inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias (n = 12) underwent ICD insertion. All study patients were followed for the combined arrhythmic event end point of appropriate ICD therapies or sudden death. Mean length of follow-up to sustained ventricular arrhythmia or sudden death was 32 +/- 30 months. Five of 6 patients (83%) with spontaneous sustained ventricular arrhythmias and 4 of 6 patients (67%) without spontaneous but with inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias received appropriate ICD therapy. Two of 20 patients (10%) with neither spontaneous nor inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias experienced sustained ventricular arrhythmias or sudden death. Programmed ventricular stimulation predicted subsequent arrhythmic events in the entire population (relative hazard 4.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30 to 15.39) and in patients who presented without spontaneous sustained ventricular arrhythmias (relative hazard 6.97, 95% CI 1.27 to 38.27). No patient with an ICD died of a primary arrhythmic event. In patients with spontaneous or inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias, mean survival from first appropriate ICD therapy to death or cardiac transplant was 60 +/- 46 months, with only 2 patients dying or reaching transplant at study end. In conclusion, programmed ventricular stimulation identifies patients with cardiac sarcoidosis at high risk for future arrhythmic events. ICDs effectively terminate life-threatening arrhythmias in high-risk patients, with significant survival after first appropriate therapy.     

Electrophysiologic effects of bepridil in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia assessed by programmed electrical stimulation

The effect of intravenous bepridil, a new calcium antagonist with class I and III properties, was tested in 21 patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias refractory to a mean of five antiarrhythmic agents as assessed by programmed right ventricular stimulation. At control electrophysiologic study without antiarrhythmic agents, sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) was initiated in 20 patients and ventricular fibrillation (VF) was initiated in one patient. After 3 mg/kg of bepridil was administered, VT was still inducible in 19 patients (3 patients had self-terminating VT); the other 2 patients had no inducible VT after bepridil. Bepridil prolonged significantly the QTc interval, the effective refractory period, and the cycle length of induced ventricular tachycardia. Two patients with no inducible VT after intravenous bepridil were placed on oral bepridil (300 mg/day). One patient died suddenly and one patient died of progressive heart failure. The results seem to indicate that the efficacy of bepridil in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia is limited.     

Programmed ventricular stimulation for arrhythmia risk prediction in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia

Objectives. This study investigated the role of programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) for arrhythmia risk prediction in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) and spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT).Background. Nonsustained VT in patients with IDC has been associated with a high incidence of sudden cardiac death.Methods. Over the course of 4 years, 34 patients with IDC, a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤35%, and spontaneous nonsustained VT underwent PVS. All patients were prospectively followed for 24 ± 13 months.Results. Sustained ventricular arrhythmias were induced in 13 patients (38%). Sustained monomorphic VT was induced in three patients (9%), and polymorphic VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in another 10 patients (29%). No sustained ventricular arrhythmia could be induced in 21 study patients (62%). Prophylactic implantation of third-generation defibrillators (ICDs) with electrogram storage capability was performed in all 13 patients with inducible sustained VT or VF, and in nine of 21 patients (43%) without inducible sustained VT or VF. There were no significant differences between the additional use of amiodarone, d,I-sotalol, and beta-blocker therapy during follow-up in patients with and without inducible VT or VF. During 24 ± 13 months of follow-up, arrhythmic events were observed in nine patients (26%) including sudden cardiac deaths in two patients and ICD shocks for rapid VT or VF in seven patients. Arrhythmic events during follow-up occurred in four of 13 patients with inducible ventricular arrhythmias compared with five of 21 patients without inducible ventricular arrhythmias at PVS (31% vs. 24%, p = NS).Conclusion. PVS does not appear to be helpful for arrhythmia risk stratification in patients with IDC, a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and spontaneous nonsustained VT. Due to the limited number of patients, however, the power of this study is too small to exclude moderately large differences in outcome between patients with IDC with and without inducible VT or VF.     

Ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy: clinical presentation, risk stratification and results of long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND: Not all patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) are at risk for sudden cardiac death. The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk stratification in patients with ARVD/C. METHODS AND RESULTS: Programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) was performed in 34 ARVD/C patients. Twenty-two, 7 and 4 patients had documented sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (smVT), non-smVT and ventricular fibrillation, respectively. One patient experienced syncope only. An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was implanted in 11 patients inducible in smVT with hemodynamic compromise, in 4 patients with documented ventricular fibrillation and in one patient with non-smVT (194 ms tachycardia cycle length) (ICD group, n = 16). Ten patients were left without any antiarrhythmic therapy, 5 patients received antiarrhythmic drugs and 3 patients underwent successful VT ablation (non-ICD group, n = 18). Thirteen patients had an abnormal signal averaged ECG. During 6.5 +/- 2.4 years 69% of ICD patients received appropriate discharges and one non-ICD patient had a hemodynamically tolerated smVT recurrence (no sudden cardiac death in both groups). Comparison between the cycle lengths of clinical VT, induced VT and follow-up VT revealed a strong relationship (R = 0.62-0.88). On multivariate analysis abnormal signal averaged ECG and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction were statistically significant predictors for VT recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In ARVD/C the tachycardia cycle length of clinical VT, PVS-induced VT and follow-up VT correlate well implicating that a PVS-guided approach does not provide additional information. Spontaneous arrhythmia in combination with clinical presentation allows identification of patients in need for an ICD.