Noninvasive Imaging in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy—Part 2: Follow‐up and Optimization of Settings

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has become a therapeutic option for drug‐refractory heart failure. Several noninvasive imaging techniques play an increasingly important role before and after device implantation. This review highlights the acute and long‐term CRT benefits after implantation as assessed with echocardiography and nuclear imaging. Furthermore, optimization of CRT settings, in particular atrioventricular and interventricular delay, will be discussed using echocardiography and other (device‐based) techniques.     

Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Diastolic Function: Evaluation by Radionuclide Angiography

While the beneficial effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on left ventricular (LV) systolic function have been demonstrated, no information is available regarding its effects on LV diastolic function during exercise. Using radionuclide angiography, we prospectively evaluated the effects of CRT on diastolic function at rest and during exercise in 15 patients consecutively referred for CRT. All patients underwent equilibrium Tc⁹⁹ radionuclide angiography with bicycle exercise performed (1) at baseline; (2) immediately after CRT implantation, in spontaneous rhythm and during CRT; and (3) after 3 months of biventricular stimulation. Diastolic function was assessed by measurements of peak filling rate (PFR). At baseline, activation of biventricular stimulation influenced PFR neither at rest (1.06 ± 0.34 vs 1.07 ± 0.50 mL/s during spontaneous rhythm, P = 0.9) nor during exercise (1.45 ± 0.62 vs 1.33 ± 0.48 mL/s, P = 0.3). At 3 months, improvements were observed in New York Heart Association functional class and systolic function. By contrast, no improvement in diastolic function was observed either at rest (PFR = 1.11 ± 0.45 vs 1.07 ± 0.50 mL/s in spontaneous rhythm at baseline, P = 0.6) or during exercise (1.23 ± 0.50 vs 1.33 ± 0.48 mL/s, P = 0.2). These observations indicate that the intermediate benefits conferred by CRT on LV systolic function at rest and during exercise were not accompanied by similar improvements in diastolic function .     

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Double Cannulation Approach to Coronary Venous Lead Placement via a Prominent Thebesian Valve

We report identification of a prominent Thebesian valve by cardiovascular computed tomography (CT) angiography impeding cannulation of the coronary sinus, with subsequent successful coronary venous lead placement with cannulation of the coronary sinus ostium via a transvenous femoral vein approach and subsequent cannulation of the ostium with the coronary venous lead with a left subclavian approach. A 57‐year‐old man with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, New York Heart Association Class III heart failure, left bundle branch block, and an ejection fraction of 15%, underwent an attempted cardiac resynchronization therapy implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD). As the coronary sinus ostium could not be cannulated, a dual chamber ICD was placed. The patient subsequently underwent cardiovascular CT angiography, which identified a prominent Thebesian valve at the coronary sinus ostium as the anatomic obstacle to cannulation. Reattempted transvenous cardiac resynchronization therapy was accomplished successfully with a double cannulation approach: cannulation of the coronary sinus ostium with a catheter via a transvenous femoral vein approach and subsequent cannulation with the coronary venous lead via a left subclavian approach. When a prominent Thebesian valve is identified as an obstacle to transvenous left ventricular lead placement, cannulation of the coronary sinus by an alternate venous approach may allow for a coronary venous route rather than necessitate an epicardial approach.     

Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure and Renal Insufficiency

Background: Renal insufficiency (RI) adversely impacts prognosis in heart failure (HF) patients, partly because renal and cardiac dysfunction are intertwined, yet few cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) studies have examined patients with moderate‐to‐severe RI. Methods: We analyzed 787 CRT‐defibrillator (CRT‐D) recipients with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measured prior to implant. Patients were grouped by GFR (in mL/min/1.73 m²): ≥60 (n = 376), 30–59 (n = 347), and <30 (n = 64). Overall survival, changes in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and LV end‐systolic diameter, and GFR change at 3–6 months were compared among CRT‐D groups and with a control cohort (n = 88), also stratified by GFR, in whom LV lead implant was unsuccessful and a standard defibrillator (SD) was placed. All patients met clinical criteria for CRT‐D. Results: Among CRT‐D recipients, overall survival improved incrementally with higher baseline GFR (for each 10 mL/min/1.73 m² increase, corrected hazard ratio [HR] 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13–1.30, P < 0.0001). Survival among SD and CRT‐D patients within GFR < 30 and GFR ≥ 60 groups was similar, whereas CRT‐D recipients with GFR 30–59 had significantly better survival compared to SD counterparts (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.34–3.70; P = 0.002). This survival benefit was associated with improved renal and cardiac function. CRT recipients with GFR ≥ 60 derived significant echocardiographic benefit but experienced a GFR decline, whereas those with GFR < 30 had no echocardiographic benefit but did improve GFR. Conclusions: CRT may provide the largest survival benefit in HF patients with moderate RI, perhaps by improving GFR and LV function. Severe baseline RI predicts poor survival and limited echocardiographic improvement despite a modest GFR increase, such that CRT may not benefit those with GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m². CRT recipients with normal renal function derive echocardiographic benefit but no overall survival advantage. (PACE 2010; 850–859)     

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an emerging option for treating dyssynchrony-associated heart failure in patients with pediatric or congenital heart disease. CRT has proved beneficial for both the acute manipulation of cardiac output after surgery for congenital heart defects and for the management of chronic systemic ventricular failure. Although there are no prospective and randomized trial data, retrospective series show that CRT is similarly effective for managing dyssynchrony-associated heart failure in this younger population as it is for treating adults with ischemic and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. The heterogeneity of anatomical and functional substrates in which CRT shows efficacy calls for further studies defining the usefulness of CRT in specific subgroups of patients.     

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy:

In patients with heart failure and wide QRS complex, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is associated with improvement of symptoms and cardiac function. This study examined the effects of a 3-month period of CRT on left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (EF) and on LV volumes, both at rest and during exercise. A CRT system was implanted in 15 patients with severe heart failure and wide QRS. Before implant and 3 months later, all patients underwent assessment of cardiac performance with equilibrium Tc⁹⁹ radionuclide angiography with imaging in the best septal left anterior oblique view. Exercise was performed on a bicycle ergometer. At 3 months, a significant improvement in New York Heart Association functional class was observed, and radionuclide angiography showed a significant decrease in LV volumes and a significant increase in LVEF at rest, as well as a significant increase in LVEF during exercise. The remodeling processes associated with CRT did not appear to include RV function, since RVEF did not improve, and changes in RVEF did not correlate with changes in LVEF, neither at rest nor during exercise.     

Advantage of Optimizing V‐V Timing in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices

Background: There is little consensus as to the benefits of interventricular (V‐V) timing optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). A variety of parameters are currently used to optimize device timing. This study was designed to investigate the potential advantage of using 3D ejection fraction (EF) and aortic velocity‐time integral (VTI) as measures of global left ventricular (LV) function to optimize ventricular activation in CRT devices. Methods: Seventy‐four patients seen in the Optimization Clinic with adequate echocardiographic images were included. Three aortic VTI and two 3D EF values were recorded at five V‐V settings and the average value used. Aortic VTI and 3D EF were classified as the best, worst, and simultaneous setting values. Data were analyzed using a two‐tailed paired t‐test. Results: Comparing the best to worst V‐V timing settings, VTI improved by 4.7 ± 7.5 cm (P < 0.0001) and 3D EF by 9.9%± 5.7% (P < 0.0001). Comparing the simultaneous setting to the best V‐V timing setting, VTI improved by 2.4 ± 2.1 cm (P < 0.0001) and 3D EF by 3.8%± 4.9% (P < 0.0001). Aortic VTI improved in 85% of patients and 3D EF improved in 72%. However, only 26% of the patients had the same optimal setting using aortic VTI and 3D EF yielding an r² value of 0.003. Conclusions: Individualized echocardiographic V‐V optimization of CRT devices improves global LV function as measured by aortic VTI and 3D EF. Substantial differences in function were seen over an 80‐ms range of V‐V timing and optimization resulted in improved LV function in the majority of patients. (PACE 2010; 33:1161–1168)     

Cardiac resynchronization therapy and obstructive sleep-related breathing disorder in patients with congestive heart failure

Objectives: To assess the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with or without atrial overdrive pacing, on sleep‐related breathing disorder (SRBD). Introduction: CRT may have a positive influence on SRBD in patients who qualify for the therapy. Data are inconclusive in patients with obstructive SRBD. Methods: Consenting patients eligible for CRT underwent a baseline polysomnography (PSG) 2 weeks after implantation during which pacing was withheld. Patients with an apnea hypopnea index (AHI) ≥15 but <50 were enrolled and randomized to atrial overdrive pacing (DDD) versus atrial synchronous pacing (VDD) with biventricular pacing in both arms. Patients underwent two further PSGs 12 weeks apart. Results: Nineteen men with New York Heart Association class III congestive heart failure participated in the study (age 67.2 ± 7.5, Caucasian 78.9%, ischemic 73.7%). The score on Epworth Sleepiness Score was 7.3 ± 4.0, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index 7.4 ± 3.1, and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire 36.9 ± 21.9. There were no differences between the groups. At baseline, patients exhibited poor sleep efficiency (65.3 ± 16.6%) with nadir oxygen saturation of 83.5 ± 5.3% and moderate to severe SRBD (AHI 21.5 ± 15.3) that was mainly obstructive (central apnea index 3.3 ± 6.7/hour). On both follow‐up assessments, there was no improvement in indices of SRBD (sleep efficiency [68.3 ± 17.9%], nadir oxygen saturation of 82.8 ± 4.6%, and AHI 24.9 ± 21.9). Conclusion: In a cohort of elderly male CHF patients receiving CRT, CRT had no impact on obstructive SRBD burden with or without atrial overdrive pacing. (PACE 2011; 34:593–603)     

How Many Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy May Potentially Benefit from Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?

GRIMM, W., et al .: How Many Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy May Potentially Benefit from Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy? The clinical and electrocardiographic Marburg Cardiomyopathy database was analyzed to identify potential candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular or left ventricular pacing among 566 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). All of the following restrictive selection criteria were fulfilled by 38 patients (7%): NYHA functional class ≥ 3 (   n = 193   , 34%), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30% (n = 238, 42%), sinus rhythm (   n = 437   , 77%), left bundle branch block (LBBB,   n = 142   , 25%), and QRS duration ≥ 150 ms (   n = 136   , 24%). In 78 of the 566 patients (14%) all of the following less restrictive selection criteria were fulfilled: NYHA functional class ≥3 (   n = 193   , 34%), LVEF < 35% in presence of any underlying rhythm (n = 326, 58%), QRS duration ≥ 120 ms with right or left bundle branch block (   n = 223   , 39%). Thus, between 7% and 14% of patients with DCM were candidates for CRT depending on the application of strict versus less restrictive selection criteria.(PACE 2003; 26[Pt. II]:155–157)