Portal vein thrombosis successfully treated with a colectomy in active ulcerative colitis

Portal vein thrombosis is a rare complication in ulcerative colitis. We present a patient with portal vein thrombosis in ulcerative colitis who was successfully treated with colectomy. A 38-year-old Japanese female was admitted to our hospital because of an exacerbation of colitis. Abdominal ultrasonography performed because of liver dysfunction showed the thrombus in an umbilical portion of the portal vein. The patient underwent a subtotal colectomy and ileostomy because her colitis did not respond to intensive intravenous therapy. Although portal vein thrombus was treated with an intravenous infusion of urokinase before the operation, no change in the thrombus size was found. Approximately three months after the colectomy, the thrombus of the portal vein disappeared without anticoagulant therapy. Although a resection of an inflamed colon may be theoretically effective in the thrombosis in the inflammatory bowel disease, its benefit has not been confirmed. Our case suggests that the resection of the diseased bowel may have a favorable effect on the course of portal vein thrombosis in acute attacks of ulcerative colitis.     

Use of an interpositional venous graft posterior to the pancreas for LDLT patients with portal vein thrombosis

Portal vein thrombosis is a risk factor in patients who require liver transplantation, because it is often difficult to treat portal vein thrombosis, especially when it involves the confluence of the superior mesenteric vein and splenic vein. Since some transplant centers that perform living-donor liver transplantation do not have cryopreserved cadaveric vein grafts available and do not use graft veins that are long enough for a jump graft, it is difficult to reconstruct the portal vein with interpositional vein grafts in patients with portal vein thrombosis. We describe the treatment of portal vein thrombosis with an interpositional vascular graft posterior to the pancreas in a living-donor liver transplantation patient without using a jump graft. This method provided a shorter rout between the donor and recipient portal vein than a jump graft. Our experience suggests that this solution can be helpful in treating portal vein thrombosis.     

Treatment of extensive subacute portal, mesenteric and ileocolic vein thrombosis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.

Portal or/and mesenteric vein thrombosis is a rare condition with high mortality in an acute form. Therapy of thrombosis is not well defined, although there are some general guidelines that differ according to disease onset and clinical presentation. In acute thrombosis with bowel infarction, surgical resection with possible thrombolysis is advised. The best therapy for the subacute form is not known and the approach differs between centers. For chronic disease, prolonged anticoagulant therapy is recommended. Thrombolysis is well recognized in the treatment of acute ischemic coronary or cerebral diseases. Success of treatment is better if therapy is introduced within a few hours after symptoms have begun. We describe a 25-year-old patient with the subacute form of extensive portal, mesenteric and ileocolic vein thrombosis in the setting of underlying liver cirrhosis due to autoimmune disease. An aggressive therapeutic approach is advised, especially in patients who will eventually undergo liver transplantation, since portal and/or mesenteric vein thrombosis is relative contraindication for liver transplantation in the majority of transplant centers.     

肝硬化门静脉血栓形成的危险因素

门静脉血栓(PVT)在肝硬化患者中较常见,合并PVT的静脉曲张更容易出血,止血失败率及再出血率更高,对于肝移植患者,其预后更差。目前PVT形成的相关危险因素较多,如肝功能严重程度、非选择性β受体阻滞剂的使用、门静脉血流速度等。重点对肝硬化PVT形成的危险因素进行综述,以进一步了解PVT形成的相关机制和PVT的危险程度。     

Portal vein thrombosis in paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria.

A 28-year-old man was hospitalized with nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and low-grade fever. He had a 6-month history of paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH), and laboratory data showed anaemia and liver dysfunction. An abdominal ultrasonography showed ascites and portal vein thrombosis. After receiving antithrombotic treatment, the portal vein thrombosis did not extend. Portal vein thrombosis is very rare but should be considered when we encounter liver dysfunction associated with PNH as well as hepatic vein thrombosis. Ultrasonography is very useful in detecting portal vein thrombosis and facilitating early diagnosis. Warfarin is very effective in preventing exacerbation of portal vein thrombosis in PNH.     

Liver abscess, portal vein thrombosis and cavernoma formation following umbilical vein catherisation in two neonates.

Liver abscess is a rare condition in neonates and its diagnosis requires a high degree of suspicion. CT scan and ultrasound are the most sensitive diagnostic modalities for detecting hepatic abscess. Portal vein thrombosis and cavernoma formation are rare complications following neonatal liver abscess and sepsis. We describe the case of two neonates with hepatic abscess following umblical vein catheterisation, with rare complications of portal vein thrombosis and portal vein cavernoma formation. Therefore, unreserved caution should be exercised in performing umbilical cannulation in neonates due to the inherent risks involved with this procedure.     

Gore-Tex jump graft for portal vein thrombosis following living donor liver transplantation

Portal vein thrombosis is a rare surgical complication following liver transplantation, which remains a cause of graft loss and death. We describe here the treatment of portal vein thrombosis following living donor liver transplantation using an extended left lobe graft. The patient was treated with a Gore-Tex vascular jump graft extra-anatomically interposed between the recipient superior mesenteric vein and the donor umbilical vein. This technique allowed the hepatic hilum to be left untouched and supplied suitable blood flow to the hepatic allograft. Our experience suggests that this innovative technical solution can be helpful in the effort to rescue cases of hepatic allograft with vascular complications.     

Contralateral glissonian pedicle occlusion in a case of portal vein tumor thrombosis

To dissect portal vein branches directly and encircle them separately is a common procedure that is performed to control back flow bleeding during operations for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis. However, this technique has an increased risk of injuring contralateral portal branches and disseminating thrombosis fragments to the remnant liver. We present an alternative technique using right-sided glissonian pedicle occlusion for hepatocellular carcinoma with left portal vein tumor thrombosis due to complex anatomical vasculatures of the hepatic pedicle. This technique would be very useful for liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma with the major type of portal vein tumor thrombosis.     

Portal vein thrombosis in children: clinical and laboratory study of 26 cases]

Portal vein thrombosis represents one of the most frequent causes of portal hypertension in childhood. The aim of the present study was to describe the clinical and laboratorial characteristics of portal vein thrombosis in pediatric patient. We studied 26 children with diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis through splenoportography (two patients) and ultrasound scan (24 patients) which ages varied from 2 months to 11 years and 4 months (median-5 years and 3 months). Data of the patient history, physical and laboratories examination were used to a retrospective study which was done through medical record analysis. The main complaint of the examination was hematemesis, which was found in 57.6%. In 26.9% a possible risk factor for portal vein thrombosis was found [catheterization of the umbilical vein (four), sepsis (two), omphalitis (one)]. Splenomegaly was present in all cases and the associated illness to portal vein thrombosis were: hepatoportal sclerosis (three), cytomegalovirus infection (two), blastomycosis (two), virus C (two), virus B (one) and virus A (one). The time between the first bleeding and the examination at University of Campinas Hospital, in Campinas, SP, Brazil, varied from 0.23 months to 54 months with a median of 12 months. Only 11.5% of patients underwent the endoscopy with sclerotherapy before going to University of Campinas Hospital. Aminotransferases' activities were considered normal in 20 patients. We could conclude that: 1. The most frequent initial symptom was hematemesis. 2. The known risk factors for portal vein thrombosis were present in about 1/3 of the cases. 3. Laboratorial exams usually indicated absence of hepatocitic lesions. 4. The efforts towards sending the patient to a reference center were late with a delayed diagnostic and with delayed effective therapeutic conduct. 5. In about 50% of the cases there was PVT associated with other hepatic diseases.     

因子V Leiden突变在布加综合征与门静脉血栓形成中的意义

布加综合征与门静脉血栓是2种罕见的肝脏血管病,可伴发肝功能衰竭及门静脉高压症等严重并发症。研究证据表明因子V Leiden(FVL)突变是西方布加综合征与门静脉血栓患者的重要危险因素,但在中国布加综合征患者中比较罕见。着重回顾FVL突变在布加综合征与门静脉血栓形成中的意义,提出尚须前瞻性研究进一步评估FVL突变在中国门静脉血栓患者中的患病率,以判断FVL突变筛查的必要性。     

Advanced non-alcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis: A high-risk population for pre-liver transplant portal vein thrombosis

AIM To examine if liver transplant recipients with high-risk non-alcoholic steatohepatitis(NASH) are at increased risk for pre-transplant portal venous thrombosis.METHODS Data on all liver transplants in the United States from February 2002 through September 2014 were analyzed. Recipients were sorted into three distinct groups: High-risk(age 60, body mass index 30 kg/m2, hypertension and diabetes), low-risk and non-NASH cirrhosis. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed.RESULTS Thirty-five thousand and seventy-two candidates underwent liver transplantation and of those organ recipients, 465 were transplanted for high-risk and 2775 for lowrisk NASH. Two thousand six hundred and twentysix(7.5%) recipients had pre-transplant portal vein thrombosis; 66(14.2%) of the high-risk NASH group had portal vein thrombosis vs 328(11.8%) of the lowrisk NASH group. In general, all NASH recipients were less likely to be male or African American and more likely to be obese. In adjusted multivariable regression analyses, high-risk recipients had the greatest risk ofpre-transplant portal vein thrombosis with OR = 2.11(95%CI: 1.60-2.76, P 0.001) when referenced to the non-NASH group.CONCLUSION Liver transplant candidates with high-risk NASH are at the greatest risk for portal vein thrombosis development prior to transplantation. These candidates may benefit from interventions to decrease their likelihood of clot formation and resultant downstream hepatic decompensating events. Prospective study is needed.     

Agitation thrombolysis combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of non-cirrhotic acute portal vein thrombosis

AIM To evaluate the safety and efficacy of agitation thrombolysis(AT) combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis(CDT) for the treatment of non-cirrhotic acute portal vein thrombosis(PVT). METHODS Nine patients with non-cirrhotic acute PVT who underwent AT combined with CDT were analyzed retrospectively. Portography was carried out via the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic(commonly known as TIP) or percutaneous transhepatic(commonly known as PT) route, followed by AT combined with CDT. Complications of the procedure, and the changes in clinical symptoms, hemodynamics of the portal vein and liver function were recorded. Follow-up was scheduled at1, 3 and 6 mo after treatment, and every 6 mo thereafter, or when the patients developed clinical symptoms related to PVT. Color Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging were performed during the follow-up period to determine the condition of the portal vein.RESULTS AT combined with CDT was successfully performed. The portal vein was reached via the TIP route in 6 patients, and via the PT route in 3 patients. All clinical symptoms were relieved or disappeared, with the exception of 1 patient who died of intestinal necrosis 9 d after treatment. Significant differences in the changes in portal vein hemodynamics were observed, including the maximum lumen occupancy of PVT, portal vein pressure and flow velocity between pre-and posttreatment(P 0.05). During the follow-up period, recurrence was observed in 1 patient at 19 mo after the procedure, and the portal vein was patent in the remaining patients.CONCLUSION AT combined with CDT is a safe and effective method for the treatment of non-cirrhotic acute PVT.     

Combined liver vein and spleen pulp pressure measurements in patients with portal or splenic vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND: Patients with thrombosis of the portal or splenic vein may develop portal hypertension with bleeding from oesophageal or gastric varices. The relevant portal pressure cannot be measured by liver vein catheterization or transhepatic puncture of the portal vein because the obstruction is peripheral to the accessible part of the portal system. METHODS: Liver vein catheterization was combined with percutaneous splenic pressure measurement in 10 patients with portal or splenic vein thrombosis and no cirrhosis, and 10 cirrhotic patients without thrombosis. The splenic pressure was measured by percutaneous puncture below the curvature of the ribs with an angle of the needle to skin of 30 degrees in order to minimize the risk of cutting the spleen if the patient took a deep breath. RESULTS: None of the patients in whom the described procedure was followed had complications. Pressure measurements in the spleen pulp and splenic vein were concordant. The pressure gradient across the portal venous system (splenic-to-wedged hepatic vein pressure) was -1.3 to 8.5 mmHg (median, 2.8 mmHg) in cirrhosis patients and 0-44 mmHg (median, 18 mmHg) in thrombosis patients, the variation reflecting various degrees of obstruction to flow in the portal venous system. Peripheral portal pressure (splenic-to-free liver vein pressure gradient) was 1.1-28 mmHg (median, 17 mmHg) in cirrhotic patients and 11-52 mmHg (median, 23 mmHg) in thrombosis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Liver vein catheterization combined with percutaneous splenic pressure measurement is feasible in quantifying pressure gradient across a thrombosis of the portal/splenic vein and in quantifying portal pressure peripheral to this kind of thrombosis.     

Embolization of splenorenal shunt associated to portal vein thrombosis and hepatic encephalopathy

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a cognitive disturbance characterized by neuropsychiatric alterations. It occurs in acute and chronic hepatic disease and also in patients with portosystemic shunts. The presence of these portosystemic shunts allows the passage of nitrogenous substances from the intestines through systemic veins without liver depuration. Therefore, the embolization of these shunts has been performed to control HE manifestations, but the presence of portal vein thrombosis is considered a contraindication. In this presentation we show a cirrhotic patient with severe HE and portal vein thrombosis who was submitted to embolization of a large portosystemic shunt. Case report: a 57 years-old cirrhotic patient who had been hospitalized many times for persistent HE and hepatic coma, even without precipitant factors. She had a wide portosystemic shunt and also portal vein thrombosis. The abdominal angiography confirmed the splenorenal shunt and showed other shunts. The larger shunt was embolized through placement of microcoils, and the patient had no recurrence of overt HE. There was a little increase of esophageal and gastric varices, but no endoscopic treatment was needed. Since portosystemic shunts are frequent causes of recurrent HE in cirrhotic patients, portal vein thrombosis should be considered a relative contraindication to perform a shunt embolization. However, in particular cases with many shunts and severe HE, we found that one of these shunts can be safely embolized and this procedure can be sufficient to obtain a good HE recovery. In conclusion, we reported a case of persistent HE due to a wide portosystemic shunt associated with portal vein thrombosis. As the patient had other shunts, she was successfully treated by embolization of the larger shunt.     

Portal vein thrombosis: a concise review

Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is an uncommon cause for presinusoidal portal hypertension. Although several predisposing conditions are known to exist in the background of PVT, there still remains a proportion of patients in whom the etiology is not known and the pathogenesis is unclear. In this review we summarize the literature on PVT and present the current knowledge about the precipitating factors of PVT. Further, we discuss the advances in the radiological diagnosis that have improved diagnostic accuracy and are noninvasive. Finally, we discuss the treatment options for patients who have varying extents of thrombosis in the portal vein and specifically focus on PVT that is encountered before and after liver transplantation.     

A case of portal vein thrombosis associated with acute pancreatitis and cholangitis]

Portal vein thrombosis is a rare complication accompanied with acute pancreatitis or cholangitis/cholecystitis. The main pathogenesis of portal vein thrombosis in pancreatitis or cholangitis/cholecystitis are suggested to be venous compression by pseudocyst and an imbalance between the blood coagulation and fibrinolysis. In this case report, we experienced a 63 year old male who developed portal vein thrombosis later in the course of the treatment of acute gallstone pancreatitis with cholangitis/cholecystitis without any symptom or sign. The diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis was given on follow up CT scan and serum protein S activity was decreased to 27% in laboratory study. Immediate anticoagulation therapy with heparin and thrombolytic therapy with urokinase and balloon dilatation were performed. Despite the aggressive treatment, complete reperfusion could not be obtained. With oral warfarin anticoagulation, the patient showed no disease progression and was discharged. We report a case of portal vein thrombosis as a complication of acute pancreatitis and cholangitis/cholecystitis with a review of literatures.     

Portal venous thrombosis after umbilical vein catheterization.

PURPOSE: Portal vein thrombosis has been associated with umbilical venous catheterization. This prospective study was done to determine the incidence of neonatal portal venous thrombosis associated with catheterization of the umbilical vein . METHODS: Neonates who had undergone umbilical vein catheterization for exchange transfusion between March 2003 and March 2004 in Children's Hospital of Tabriz, Iran, were included. Doppler ultrasonography was performed within 1-2 weeks after the removal of the catheter. In the cases with portal venous thrombosis, subsequent serial ultrasonography was performed at intervals of every 1-2 months until clot resolution. Risk factors, if any were identified and correlated with catheter-related thrombi. RESULTS: Ultrasonography detected clinically silent portal venous thrombosis in 17 (34%) of 50 neonates. Follow-up ultrasonography was available in 13 of 17 babies, and revealed complete or partial resolution in all the cases. Sepsis was identified as a significant risk factor (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Umbilical venous catheter-associated thrombosis is common, and spontaneous resolution occurs in most cases.     

Changing perspectives in portal vein thrombosis

The aetiology of portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is heterogeneous. Important primary risk factors for PVT are cirrhosis, hepatobiliary malignancies and pancreatitis. Newly discovered thrombotic risk factors, such as latent myeloproliferative disorders and prothrombotic genetic defects, have also been identified as major risk factors for PVT. At least one-third of PVT patients demonstrate a combination of thrombotic risk factors. PVT, which does not have a detrimental effect on liver function, usually becomes manifest as a variceal haemorrhage in the oesophagus months to years after the development of thrombosis. Owing to intact coagulation variceal bleeding has a better prognosis among patients with PVT than cirrhotics. Endoscopic sclerotherapy or band ligation is the primary therapeutic option for variceal bleeding in patients with PVT. It is questionable whether anticoagulant therapy should be started, since it has not proven beneficial for most PVT patients. Therapy with anticoagulants is only recommended for those with acute PVT (especially in association with mesenteric vein thrombosis), those who recently underwent a portosystemic shunt procedure, and those with other thrombotic manifestations, particularly in case of proven hypercoagulability. Mortality of patients with PVT may be associated with concomitant medical conditions which lead to the PVT or with manifestations of portal hypertension, such as variceal haemorrhage. Multivariate analysis of a large Dutch PVT population has shown that age, malignancy, ascites and the presence of mesenteric vein thrombosis are independently related to survival. Death due to a variceal haemorrhage is rare. Poor outcome of PVT thus appears to be associated primarily with concomitant diseases which lead to PVT, and not the complications of portal hypertension. It is therefore uncertain whether surgical portosystemic shunting affects survival favourably.     

Portal vein thrombosis, cirrhosis, and liver transplantation

Portal vein thrombosis is not uncommon in candidates for transplantation. Partial thrombosis is more common than complete thrombosis. Despite careful screening at evaluation, a number of patients are still found with previously unrecognized thrombosis per-operatively. The objective is to recanalize the portal vein or, if recanalization is not achievable, to prevent the extension of the thrombus so that a splanchnic vein can be used as the inflow vessel to restore physiological blood flow to the allograft. Anticoagulation during waiting time and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) are two options to achieve these goals. TIPS may achieve recanalization in patients with complete portal vein thrombosis. However, a marked impairment in liver function, which is a characteristic feature of most candidates for transplantation, may be a contraindication for TIPS. Importantly, the MELD score is artificially increased by the administration of vitamin K antagonists due to prolonged INR. When patency of the portal vein and/or superior mesenteric vein is not achieved, only non-anatomical techniques (renoportal anastomosis or cavoportal hemitransposition) can be performed. These techniques, which do not fully reverse portal hypertension, are associated with higher morbidity and mortality risks. Multivisceral transplantation including the liver and small bowel needs to be evaluated. In the absence of prothrombotic states that may persist after transplantation, there is no evidence that pre-transplant portal vein thrombosis justifies long term anticoagulation post-transplantation, provided portal flow has been restored through conventional end-to-end portal anastomosis.     

Portal vein thrombosis associated with hilar bile duct carcinoma and liver abscess

As most portal vein occlusion in hilar bile duct carcinoma is caused by tumor invasion to the portal vein, other mechanisms of its occlusion are very rare. We report the case of a 69-year-old man who underwent surgical resection for an advanced hilar bile duct carcinoma associated with unusual portal vein occlusion. Preoperative diagnosis was advanced hilar bile duct carcinoma with liver abscess and right portal vein occlusion due to tumor invasion. Extended right hepatectomy combined with resection of caudate lobe was performed. Intraoperatively, tumor invasion to the portal vein was not evident and resected margin of the right portal vein showed thrombosis and no evidence of malignancy histologically. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a patient with a combination of portal vein thrombosis and liver abscess in hilar bile duct carcinoma. Although portal vein occlusion due to thrombosis is an unusual complication in hilar bile duct carcinoma, the presence of liver abscess may be a useful diagnostic implication of this occlusion.