Randomized phase III comparison of three doxorubicin-based chemotherapy regimens in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Southeastern Cancer Study Group trial

From 1978 to 1981, 537 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were randomly assigned to three regimens containing cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin alone or in combination with methotrexate or cisplatin. Eligible patients had measurable disease and had no prior exposure to chemotherapy. Of the patients entered on the study, 505 were evaluable for toxicity and 488 were evaluable for response. The overall response rate (complete and partial responses) was only 9%. Response rates did not vary significantly with respect to treatment regimen, histologic subtypes, extent of disease, or performance status. There was no survival advantage for any regimen. The major toxicities were myelosuppression and nausea-vomiting. These doxorubicin-based chemotherapy regimens produced disappointing results in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A search for more active antitumor agents in lung cancer is necessary.     

Concurrent celecoxib versus placebo in patients with stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer: a randomised phase II trial.

In several pre-clinical models, cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors increase radio-sensitivity of tumours, whilst not affecting normal tissues. A randomised phase II trial comparing concurrent radiotherapy with either celecoxib or placebo in patients with stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer was therefore initiated. Because of poor recruitment, the study was stopped after the enrollment of 41 patients, instead of the foreseen 102. None of the endpoints differed significantly between both groups. However, due to the limited number of patients, no definitive conclusions can be drawn.     

The ELVIS trial: a phase III study of single-agent vinorelbine as first-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Elderly Lung Cancer Vinorelbine Italian Study

In a phase III trial, 191 patients aged over 70 with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to receive best supportive care (BSC) alone or BSC plus vinorelbine on days 1 and 8, q 21 days for up to six cycles. Increasing difficulties in recruitment meant that the investigators, blinded to the results, stopped the trial early. Data from 161 patients have been analyzed. The vinorelbine regimen was well tolerated. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 10% of patients and grade 2/3 anemia in 16%. The principle nonhematological toxicities were constipation and fatigue. An objective response rate was recorded in 19.7% of the 76 patients treated with vinorelbine. The survival experience of these patients was significantly superior to that among control patients. The median duration of survival was longer (28 versus 21 weeks) and patients receiving vinorelbine were significantly more likely to survive to one year (32% versus 14%). The relative risk of death in the vinorelbine group was 0.65 (95% confidence interval: 0.45-0.93). Quality of life was extensively investigated using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer scales. While aspects of quality-of-life issues that were directly related to drug toxicity (such as nausea and constipation) were lower in the vinorelbine group, patients who received vinorelbine fared better than controls on measures related to lung cancer symptoms and pain and on social, cognitive, and physical functioning.     

Temozolomide in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with and without brain metastases. a phase II study of the EORTC Lung Cancer Group (08965)

This study was performed to evaluate the activity of single-agent temozolomide in two groups of chemotherapy-na?ve non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, with (12 patients) and without (13 patients) brain metastases (BM). Patients in both groups were treated with temozolomide 200 mg/m(2)/day, administered orally for 5 consecutive days of a 28-day cycle. Treatment was continued for up to six cycles, disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The median number of received cycles was only one in the group with and two in the group without BM, and early disease progression was the main reason for treatment discontinuation. Toxicity was moderate-in the group of patients with BM, the most frequently observed grade 3 or 4 side-effects included thrombocytopenia (17%), granulocytopenia (17%), lethargy (17%); other neurological (17%) and other genitourinary toxicity (17%). Patients without BM experienced anaemia (15%), thrombocytopenia (23%), nausea (15%) and lethargy (15%). This trial was designed according to Simon one-sample two-stage testing procedure and both groups of patients were assessed separately. No objective response was observed in either group and the study was closed after the first step of accrual with the conclusion of a lack of therapeutic activity of single-agent temozolomide in patients with stage IV NSCLC.     

A phase II trial with RFS2000 (rubitecan) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Rubitecan (RFS2000, 9 nitrocamptothecin,) is a new oral topoisomerase I inhibitor. We report a phase II, single-arm, open-label study of RFS2000 as first line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Seventeen treatment-naïve patients with stage IIIB (9/17) and IV (8/17) NSCLC (11 male and 6 female) were treated, the median age was 62 years (range 52–86), and the majority of patients (14/17) were of performance status 1. RFS2000 was given orally, daily for 5 days, repeated every week. The starting dose was 1.5 mg/m²/day, and dose adjustment was permitted based upon toxicity. Fifteen patients had a dose escalation to 1.75 mg/m²/day and 7 had a second dose escalation to the protocol maximum level of 2.0 mg/m²/day. RFS2000 was tolerated well. Almost all adverse events were grade 1 and 2. The most frequently encountered adverse events were diarrhoea, nausea, anorexia, and lethargy. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were not observed in any patient. There were no responders to RFS2000 treatment, 10 patients had stable disease as their best response, whilst five had tumour progression. Two patients were not assessable for tumour response. The median survival time was 257 days (95% CI = 222–352). RFS2000 appears to be inactive at dose levels of 1.5–2.0 mg/m²/day in advanced NSCLC patients. Since only mild toxicity and no myelosuppression were encountered, these dose level are too low for this treatment-naïve patient population with NSCLC. Further studies at an increased dose would be required to identify whether this agent has merit in the treatment of NSCLC.     

Eligibility of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer for phase III chemotherapy trials

Background  

Evidence that chemotherapy improves survival and quality of life in patients with stage IIIB & IV non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is based on large randomized controlled trials. The purpose of this study was to determine eligibility of patients with advanced NSCLC for major chemotherapy trials.     

A phase II study of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer. CPT-11 Lung Cancer Study Group

Based upon the results of phase I study of irinotecan (CPT-11) combined with cisplatin (CDDP) on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a combination phase II study on NSCLC was carried out from Feb., 1992 to Sep., 1992. CPT-11 (60 mg/m2) and CDDP (80 mg/m2) were administered by i.v. drip infusion, with administration schedules of Days 1, 8, 15 and only Day 1, respectively. This therapy course was repeated every 4 weeks. Subjects were NSCLC patients of stage III B or IV disease. Those without prior chemotherapy (Group A) and those with prior therapy (Group B) were enrolled separately. Seventy patients were entered into Group A and 32 patients into Group B. One of the patients of Group A was ineligible. The characteristics of the eligible cases of Group A were: male/female, 51/18; median age, 61 years old; PS 0/1/2, 18/39/12; stage IIIB/IV, 26/43; and adeno/squamous/large, 51/15/3. Those of group B were: male/female, 20/12; median age, 62 years old; PS 0/1/2, 5/18/9; stage I/IIIB/IV, 1/7/24, adeno/squamous/large/ad-sq, 28/2/1/1. Thirty-three patients (47.8%) responded in Group A and B patients (25.0%) responded in Group B. Major adverse reactions (grade 3 or higher) of Group A/Group B were neutropenia (80.3%/73.3%), anemia (35.3%/34.4%), diarrhea (18.8%/28.1%) and nausea/vomiting (34.8%/34.4%). Median survival times for Group A and Group B were 308 and 295 days, respectively. CPT-11 in combination with CDDP is effective against NSCLC, suggesting that further studies are needed to determine the usefulness of this therapy.     

Chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) phase III randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Vinorelbine prolongs survival and improves quality of life in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Some studies have also suggested that gemcitabine is well tolerated and effective in such patients. We compared the effectiveness and toxicity of the combination of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine with those of each drug given alone in an open-label, randomized phase III trial in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Patients aged 70 years and older, enrolled between December 1997 and November 2000, were randomly assigned to receive intravenous vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2) of body surface area), gemcitabine (1200 mg/m(2)), or vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2)) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)). All treatments were delivered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary endpoint was survival. Survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by the Mantel-Haenszel test. Secondary endpoints were quality of life and toxicity. RESULTS: Of 698 patients available for intention-to-treat analysis, 233 were assigned to receive vinorelbine, 233 to gemcitabine, and 232 to vinorelbine plus gemcitabine. Compared with each single drug, the combination treatment did not improve survival. The hazard ratio of death for patients receiving the combination treatment was 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95 to 1.44) that of patients receiving vinorelbine and 1.06 (95% CI = 0.86 to 1.29) that of patients receiving gemcitabine. Although quality of life was similar across the three treatment arms, the combination treatment was more toxic than the two drugs given singly. CONCLUSION: The combination of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine is not more effective than single-agent vinorelbine or gemcitabine in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Randomized phase III study of 3-weekly versus weekly docetaxel in pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a Spanish Lung Cancer Group trial.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is a widely accepted second-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a risk of myelotoxicity. This study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity profile of two docetaxel regimens in NSCLC patients who had failed first-line non-docetaxel-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 259 patients from 33 Spanish centers were randomized to receive either docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) administered every 3 weeks (3W arm) or docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) given weekly (1W arm) for 6 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest. The primary end point was 1-year survival; secondary end points were median survival, time to progression, response and toxicity. RESULTS: One-year survival was 27% in the 3W and 22% in the 1W arm. Median time to progression was also similar in the two arms. Median survival was 6.6 months in the 3W arm versus 5.4 months in the 1W arm (P = 0.075). Response rates were 9.3% in the 3W arm and 4.8% in the 1W arm. More patients in the 1W arm experienced mucositis [1W, nine patients (7.2%); 3W, two patients (1.6%); P = 0.032], while febrile neutropenia was significantly higher in the 3W arm [3W, 10 patients (7.8%); 1W, one patient (0.8%); P = 0.010]. CONCLUSIONS: Both weekly and 3-weekly docetaxel were effective and well-tolerated, with different toxicity profiles. In general, there was no indication to recommend the weekly schedule. However, the significant lower rate of febrile neutropenia observed in the weekly schedule makes it a good alternative for patients at risk of severe neutropenia.     

A phase II clinical trial of celecoxib combined with platinum-based regimen as first-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with cyclooxygenase-2 positive expression

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of celecoxib plus platinum-doublet as first-line chemotherapy in treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to determine the subgroup benefiting from celecoxib combined therapy by molecular analysis. Methods: A total of 44 treatment-naive patients of advanced NSCLC with positive cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression confirmed by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining were designed to receive celecoxib plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy (cisplatin plus gemcitabine, novelbine or docetaxol) from February 2005 to May 2007. On 5(7 day before chemotherapy, 400 mg celecoxib was administered twice a day orally until obvious evidence of disease progression or intolerable toxicity was found. Adverse events were recorded according to NCI-CTC criteria. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), 1-year survival rate, response rate (RR) and safety. Additionally, we detected epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) status including EGFR gene amplification by real-time PCR and gene mutations by DHPLC followed by sequencing. Results: The response rate was 45% (20/44), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 59% (26/44). The median progression-free survival time and median survival time were 6 m and 18 m, respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 68%. Chemotherapy cycle numbers and best response were found to be the predictive factors for PFS by COX model analysis (P=0.023 and P=0.000, respectively). No factor was found to affect OS. The most common toxicities included neutropenia and nausea/vomit. EGFR gene amplification was an independent prognostic factor influencing OS (P=0.0002). Patients with EGFR mutations (exon 21) had a tendency of disease progression (P=0.041). Conclusion: Encouraging activities of celecoxib combined with platinum-doublet chemotherapy were demonstrated in treatment-naive patients with advanced NSCLC, with good tolerances. For COX-2 IHC positive patients, positive EGFR amplification and mutation might be related to poor clinical outcomes.     

Nivolumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an evaluation of a phase III study

Lung cancer still remains associated with a high mortality rate and more efficacious therapies are needed in order to improve the disease outcome. Nivolumab is a monoclonal antibody which blocks the programmed death-1 receptor which is currently evaluated in phase III clinical trials in advanced lung cancer. Here, we evaluate the results of a phase III study in which nivolumab efficacy and safety were compared to those of docetaxel. Nivolumab was able to improve survival and progression-free survival and exhibited a very good safety profile. Further clinical data are needed in order to better position this therapy among the existing methods. The promising results support the use of this therapy as a stand-alone approach.     

Randomized phase III trial comparing cisplatin-etoposide to carboplatin-paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the regimen of carboplatin plus paclitaxel (investigational arm) versus the reference regimen of cisplatin plus etoposide for the treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 369 patients were enrolled, 179 on arm A (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and etoposide 100 mg/m2) and 190 on arm B (carboplatin AUC=6 mg/ml min and paclitaxel 225 mg/m2), with cycles repeated every 3 weeks. The arms were well balanced with respect to age, performance status, weight loss, stage of disease and disease measurability. However, significantly more women were randomized to arm A than to arm B (P=0.039). RESULTS: The objective response rate (ORR) was 15% on arm A compared with 23% on arm B (P=0.061). Median survival time, time to progression and 1-year survival rates for arms A and B were 274 days and 233 days (P=0.086), 111 days and 121 days (P=0.877), and 37% and 32%, respectively. The most prevalent toxicities were neutropenia and leukopenia and they occurred at a higher rate in arm A than in arm B. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant survival advantage for carboplatin-paclitaxel compared with cisplatin-etoposide. However, there was an overall benefit in quality of life with the carboplatin-paclitaxel regimen.     

Prognostic factors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: data from the phase III FLEX study

The FLEX study demonstrated that the addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the FLEX intention to treat (ITT) population, we investigated the prognostic significance of particular baseline characteristics. Individual patient data from the treatment arms of the ITT population of the FLEX study were combined. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to investigate variables with potential prognostic value. The ITT population comprised 1125 patients. In the univariable analysis, longer median survival times were apparent for females compared with males (12.7 vs 9.3 months); patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 compared with 1 compared with 2 (13.5 vs 10.6 vs 5.9 months); never smokers compared with former smokers compared with current smokers (14.6 vs 11.1 vs 9.0); Asians compared with Caucasians (19.5 vs 9.6 months); patients with adenocarcinoma compared with squamous cell carcinoma (12.4 vs 9.3 months) and those with metastases to one site compared with two sites compared with three or more sites (12.4 months vs 9.8 months vs 6.4 months). Age (<65 vs ≥65 years), tumor stage (IIIB with pleural effusion vs IV) and percentage of tumor cells expressing EGFR (<40% vs ≥40%) were not identified as possible prognostic factors in relation to survival time. In multivariable analysis, a stepwise selection procedure identified age (<65 vs ≥65 years), gender, ECOG PS, smoking status, region, tumor histology, and number of organs involved as independent factors of prognostic value. In summary, in patients with advanced NSCLC enrolled in the FLEX study, and consistent with previous analyses, particular patient and disease characteristics at baseline were shown to be independent factors of prognostic value. The FLEX study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00148798.     

Vinorelbine/gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase I trial

Vinorelbine and gemcitabine are both active as single agents in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of their different mechanisms of action, good tolerability and possible administration on an out-patient basis, vinorelbine/gemcitabine should be an interesting combination for palliative chemotherapy. Thus, we initiated a phase I dose-escalation trial in order to determine the maximum tolerated doses of vinorelbine/gemcitabine that can be administered without haematopoietic growth factors, the dose-limiting toxicities and the most frequent side-effects of this novel combination. 40 chemotherapy-na?ve patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with different doses of vinorelbine/gemcitabine on days 1, 8 and 15, and this treatment cycle was repeated on day 29. Vinorelbine and gemcitabine were escalated from 10 to 30 mg/m2 and 600 to 1200 mg/m2, respectively. A total of 63 treatment cycles were administered and 27 patients received at least two treatment cycles. Dose-limiting toxicities were leucopenia plus thrombocytopenia (2 patients) and mucositis (1 patient). The maximum tolerated dose was established at 25 mg/m2 vinorelbine combined with 1200 mg/m2 gemcitabine. Frequent side-effects were leucopenia, anaemia, nausea/vomiting, flu-like symptoms, skin rashes and elevation of liver enzymes. The recommended phase II doses are 20-25 mg/m2 vinorelbine combined with 1000-1200 mg/m2 gemcitabine on days 1, 8 and 15, but myelosuppression will have to be carefully monitored.     

奈达铂治疗非小细胞肺癌的Ⅱ期临床研究报告

背景与目的：观察奈达铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC）的疗效及不良反应。方法：本研究为多中心随机对照Ⅱ期临床研究。复治NSCLC病人进入奈达铂单单治疗组,奈达铂100mg/m^2静滴,每3周重复。将初治病人（未接受过化疗）随机分组,试验组化疗方案为奈达铂联合VDS,对照组为DDP联合VDS。结果：共138你病人,其中化疗方案单药组复发病例16例,联合治疗试验组60例,联合治疗对照组62例。单药组病人,既往均接受了DDP或卡铂的治疗,仍然有12.5％的有效率;治疗组与对照组的疗效基本接近,分别为26.7％与25.8％。在不良反应方面,贫血及白细胞下降发生率,奈达铂组与DDP组基本一致,而血小板的抑制率,奈达铂组则明显高于顺铂组,且严重的血小板下降在奈达铂组中有较高的发生率。奈达铂可致轻度恶心、呕吐。结论：奈达铂对晚期的NSCLC有一定的疗效,对于顺铂或卡铂耐药的NSCLC病人,奈达铂仍有一定的有效率。奈达铂单药或联合治疗临床可耐受,不良反应主要为骨髓抑制,特别是血小板下降。     

A randomised clinical trial of radiotherapy plus cisplatin versus radiotherapy alone in stage III non-small cell lung cancer

This study was designed to compare high-dose fractionated radiotherapy alone versus the same radiotherapy plus cisplatin in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We randomly assigned 176 patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer to one of two treatments; fractionated radiotherapy alone at dose of 64 Gy for 6-7 weeks (2 Gy given 32 times, in five fractions a week) or radiotherapy in the same schedule, combined with 20mg/m2 cisplatin 1 h before radiotherapy, given on days 1-5 of the second and sixth treatment weeks. The frequency of loco-regional progression was 68% among the patients who received radiotherapy plus cisplatin and 86% among those who received radiotherapy alone (P = 0.0001). The probability of survival free of disease after 3 years was 10% among the patients assigned to radiotherapy plus cisplatin and 0% among those treated only with radiotherapy (P = 0.0006). Overall survival at 3 years was 10% among those given radiotherapy plus cisplatin and 2% among those who received radiotherapy alone (P = 0.00001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that radiotherapy plus cisplatin significantly improved loco-regional progression-free survival and overall survival, irrespective of radiation dose. The addition of cisplatin to fractionated radiotherapy prolongs loco-regional progression-free interval and survival in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.