健侧颈7移位术后的远期功能随访

目的 随访全臂丛根性撕脱伤患者行健侧颈，移位术后远期功能恢复的情况，及该术式对健侧肢体的影响。方法 对28例行健侧颈，移位术的全臂丛损伤患者进行远期随访。其中健侧颈7移位于正中神经20例（一期手术2例，二期手术18例），桡神经3例，肌皮神经2例，同时移位于正中神经和桡神经2例，同时移位于正中神经和肌皮神经1例。随访内容：了解患肢受体神经所支配肌肉的肌力及其支配区域皮肤感觉恢复、电生理表现、双侧肢体协同活动和颈，神经根切断后对健侧肢体功能影响等情况。结果 术后28例患者远期随访发现，健侧肢体功能均无障碍。1．健侧颈7移位于正中神经：屈腕、指肌群电生理呈单纯相或单纯混合相10例（10／20），屈腕肌肌力达M3或以上者12例（12／20），屈指肌肌力达M1或以上者9例（9／20）；感觉恢复达S3或以上者10例（10／20）。2．健侧颈7移位于肌皮神经：屈肘肌群电生理呈单纯相或单纯混合相2例（2／2），屈肘肌肌力均达M3以上；前臂外侧皮肤感觉达S3或以上者l例（1／2）。3．健侧颈7移位于桡神经：伸腕、指肌群电生理呈单纯相或单纯混合相1例（1／3），伸腕肌力达M3或以上者2例（2／3），伸指肌力达M3或以上者1例（1／3）；感觉恢复达S3或以上者2例（2／3）。4．同时移位于正中神经和桡神经：屈腕肌肌力达M3或以上者2例（2／2），屈指肌肌力达M3或以上者1例（1／2）；正中神经支配区感觉均为S2。而桡神经支配区伸腕、指肌力仅为M2和‰，感觉均为S1。5．同时移位于正中神经和肌皮神经1例，其电生理均呈单纯相，屈腕肌和肱二头肌肌力均已达M3。28例中能自主活动患肢者仅为6例（6／28），22例需靠健侧肢体带动以活动患肢。结论 健侧颈，移位术是治疗全臂丛根性撕脱伤的理想术式，分期手术效果更好。如需同时修复2根神经，则应选择相互无拮抗作用的受体神经。     

健侧C7椎体前移位联合多组神经移位治疗全臂丛神经根性撕脱伤

目的：探讨健侧C7神经根椎体前移位并联合多组神经移位治疗全臂丛神经根性撕脱伤的方法和疗效。方法对20例全臂丛根性撕脱伤患者采用健侧C7神经根、膈神经、副神经及健侧C7修复患侧下干后形成新的动力神经：臂内侧皮神经、前臂内侧皮神经、下干后股移位修复患侧下干、肌皮神经、肩胛上神经、腋神经、桡神经、正中神经内侧头。并进行长期随访,观察肩外展、屈肘、屈指和伸腕伸指及手部感觉功能恢复的情况。结果20例中有17例获得随访,随访时间20～72个月（平均38个月）。肩外展平均39°,有效率（肌力M2以上）71%,优良率（肌力在M3以上）59％;屈肘平均77°,有效率83%,优良率53％;屈指、屈拇功能恢复：10例指屈肌力≥M2,有效率为59%（10/17）,其中7例肌力≥M3,优良率为42%;伸肘恢复有效率（肌力M2以上）59%,优良率42%;伸指有效率47%,优良率36%。结论健侧C7神经根椎体前移位并联合多组神经移位治疗全臂丛神经根性撕脱伤是有效的治疗方法之一。     

健侧C_7神经根移位治疗臂丛神经根性撕脱伤的疗效观察

目的观察健侧C7神经根移位修复臂丛神经根性撕脱伤术后患侧肢体运动、感觉功能恢复情况,以及该术式对健侧肢体的影响。方法 2008年8月-2010年11月,采用健侧C7神经根移位修复全臂丛神经根性撕脱伤22例。患者均为男性;年龄14～47岁,平均33.3岁。术前临床检查及电生理检测均确诊为全臂丛神经根性撕脱伤。其中修复正中神经16例,桡神经3例,肌皮神经3例;一期手术2例,二期手术20例。观察手术前、后患侧肢体运动、感觉功能恢复情况。结果 21例患者获随访,随访时间7～25个月,平均18.4个月。健侧C7神经根修复正中神经:屈腕肌肌力达3级或以上10例,屈指肌肌力达3级或以上7例;感觉恢复达S3或以上11例。健侧C7神经根修复肌皮神经:屈肘肌肌力达3级或以上2例;前臂外侧皮肤感觉达3级2例。健侧C7神经根修复桡神经(失访1例)伸腕肌肌力达3级1例;感觉恢复达S3 1例。结论健侧C7神经根全干移位修复全臂丛神经根性撕脱伤效果较好,分期手术是提高疗效的重要因素。     

健侧C7神经根移位治疗臂丛神经根性撕脱伤的疗效观察

目的观察健侧C7神经根移位修复臂丛神经根性撕脱伤术后患侧肢体运动、感觉功能恢复情况,以及该术式对健侧肢体的影响。方法 2008年8月-2010年11月,采用健侧C7神经根移位修复全臂丛神经根性撕脱伤22例。患者均为男性;年龄14～47岁,平均33.3岁。术前临床检查及电生理检测均确诊为全臂丛神经根性撕脱伤。其中修复正中神经16例,桡神经3例,肌皮神经3例;一期手术2例,二期手术20例。观察手术前、后患侧肢体运动、感觉功能恢复情况。结果 21例患者获随访,随访时间7～25个月,平均18.4个月。健侧C7神经根修复正中神经:屈腕肌肌力达3级或以上10例,屈指肌肌力达3级或以上7例;感觉恢复达S3或以上11例。健侧C7神经根修复肌皮神经:屈肘肌肌力达3级或以上2例;前臂外侧皮肤感觉达3级2例。健侧C7神经根修复桡神经(失访1例)伸腕肌肌力达3级1例;感觉恢复达S3 1例。结论健侧C7神经根全干移位修复全臂丛神经根性撕脱伤效果较好,分期手术是提高疗效的重要因素。     

全长膈神经移位恢复伸腕指功能的解剖学研究和临床应用

目的 在应用显微解剖学方法对上臂段桡神经深支部位进行研究的基础上,探讨将全长膈神经移位到上臂段桡神经深支部分以恢复伸腕、指功能的手术疗效.方法 对16具32侧尸体标本应用显微解剖学的方法,研究桡神经深、浅支在上臂段的特点及背阔肌的肌腱止点处桡神经深支在主干中的部位;在临床上开展2例经胸将全长膈神经移位到背阏肌止点处桡神经深支部分的手术,并评价其疗效.结果 通过显微解剖学研究发现上臂段桡神经前臂支内均可看见2个大的神经束组,在背阔肌的肌腱止点处桡神经深支主要位于前臂支的内侧神经束组中.1例术后1年10个月随访,肩外展80°,屈肘90°,伸肘0°,伸腕、指到位,屈腕10°,屈指尚不能;伸腕肌力达到M4,伸指肌力达到M3.另1例术后2年随访,肩外展40°,屈肘30°,伸肘0°,伸腕到位,伸指轻限,屈腕、指尚不能;伸腕肌力M,,伸指肌力达到M3-.结论 将全长膈神经移位到背阔肌的肌腱止点处桡神经前臂支的内侧神经束组可能是恢复全臂丛根性撕脱伤患者伸腕、指功能的有效方法.     

伸腕、伸指和伸拇功能重建的手术图解

因桡神经不可逆损伤,造成伸腕、伸指、伸拇和拇指桡侧外展功能丧失,可用正中神经和尺神经支配的前臂屈肌移位重建其功能。修复的方式较多,至今在临床上被公认为是标准的、疗效最好的肌腱移位术,是1960年Boyes提出的肌腱移位组合方式:即用旋前圆肌移位修复桡侧腕长短伸肌,尺侧腕屈肌移位修复指总伸肌,掌长肌移位修复拇长伸肌的方式。1 适应证用正中神经、尺神经支配的前臂屈肌移位,修复伸腕、伸指和伸拇功能,主要用于桡神经不可逆     

桡神经损伤25例手术效果分析

目的观察桡神经损伤后行神经松解、缝合和移植术的手术效果。方法根据损伤类型，对25例桡神经损伤患者采用神经内外松解术、直接缝合、神经移植术。结果术后随访1～10年，12例桡神经松解术，11例伸腕、伸拇、伸指肌力M3～M4，虎口区刺痛觉S3～S4；10例神经直接缝合者，8例伸腕、伸拇、伸指肌力为M3～M4，虎口区刺痛觉S3～S4；3例神经移植术中，2例伸腕、伸拇、伸指肌力为M3～M4，虎口区刺痛觉S3～S4。结论桡神经损伤早期，根据损伤类型进行合适的手术，均能取得满意疗效。     

全臂丛神经根性撕脱伤28例治疗分析

目的　介绍全臂丛神经根性撕脱伤的手术方法及远期疗效。方法　 1 994年至 2 0 0 1年 ,对2 8例全臂丛神经根性撕脱伤患者行多组神经移位术 ,即膈神经→肌皮神经 ,肋间神经→正中神经 ,副神经→腋神经 ,健侧C7经尺神经桥接移位至桡神经。结果　术后随访 1年半～ 5年 ,平均 2年半。 2 0例的肩外展在 30°以上 ,1 9例的屈肘在 70°以上 ,1 1例的伸肘可达 1 80°,1 6例的伸腕为 40°,1 1例的伸指可达 1 80°,1 4例的屈腕为 60°,1 0例的手指屈曲能达掌纹 ,1 3例的前臂旋前功能有所恢复。其余病例的自主运动功能均未恢复。总有效率为 75%。结论　多组神经移位治疗全臂丛神经根性撕脱伤对肩、肘、腕关节的功能恢复有确切的疗效     

全长膈神经移位重建屈指功能的临床报告

目的 探讨在胸腔镜视下切取全长膈神经直接移位至正中神经内侧头重建全臂丛撕脱伤后屈指功能的可行性,为全臂丛根性撕脱伤后屈指功能的恢复提供新思路.方法 对3例全臂丛根性撕脱伤的患者,采用胸腔镜视下游离胸腔内的全长膈神经,于入膈肌处切断膈神经,将全长膈神经直接移位于正中神经内侧头,术后每3个月随访肺功能和临床功能恢复情况.结果 3例患者随访时间均超过3年,拇长屈肌及2～5指指浅屈肌肌力均恢复至3～4级,掌长肌肌力2例为2级,1例为1级;桡侧腕屈肌、旋前圆肌、鱼际肌肌力为0级.肺功能显示患者在术后6个月内有不同程度的肺功能降低,但在1年内都恢复到术前水平.结论 胸腔镜视下切取全长膈神经直接移位至正中神经内侧头重建全臂丛撕脱伤后的屈指功能是一种可行的新术式.     

健侧颈7神经根移位治疗臂丛损伤的疗效观察

目的 观察健侧颈，神经根移位术后患侧肢体的功能恢复及对健侧颈7神经根所支配区运动、感觉的影响。方法 对25例全臂丛神经根性撕脱伤患者，均采用健侧颈7神经根（全部10例，后股15例）移位修复，其中修复上千6例，正中神经13例，桡神经3例，肌皮神经3例；并观察手术前、后健侧颈，神经根所支配肌肉功能和感觉的变化及患侧肢体的功能恢复。术后5～28个月随访到24例。结果 对健侧肢体的影响：10例健侧颈，神经根全部切断者，术后均出现不同程度的感觉运动障碍，主要表现为桡侧1～3指感觉减退、肢体酸胀、痛和不同程度的肢体无力，术后1年完全恢复正常。1例出现伸拇、伸指不能，1年半后仍无明显恢复。15例健侧颈，神经后股切断者，其中1例失访。术后2例无明显感觉障碍，但伸腕、伸指无力，3周后恢复正常。12例出现示、中指感觉异常，8例于术后3～4周后逐渐恢复正常，4例于6个月后症状消失。患肢功能恢复：术后随访至12～18个月，受区神经支配的部分肌肉获得不同程度的功能恢复。结论 健侧颈7神经根移位术后健侧肢体运动感觉功能不遗留明显的远期损害，但也偶有解剖因素导致其支配区功能的无法恢复。颈7后股移位能为受区神经提供足够的运动纤维，同时也减少了对健侧肢体感觉的影响。     

健侧颈7神经根移位修复多条神经模型的建立及功能恢复动态观察

目的比较七种不同术式的健侧颈，神经根移位术后受体神经的功能以探讨颈，神经重建多组神经的可行性。方法SD大鼠105只，随机分为7组，每组15只。建立传统的健侧颈，移位经尺神经近端（单根）接正中神经或肌皮神经或桡神经（A、D、G组），健侧颈，经尺神经近端（2股，合干法）接正中、肌皮神经或正中、桡神经（B、E组），健侧颈，经尺神经及腓肠神经（分干法）接正中、肌皮神经或正中、桡神经（C、F组）。术后观察患肢功能，抓握力及梳洗动作出现时间。结果术后2个月，修复正中和肌皮神经的B、C组，均出现主动屈趾、屈肘功能。抓握力比较：合干法（B、E组）、分干法（C、F组）及传统法（A、D、G组）的差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。术后3、6个月合干、分干法与传统法比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。梳洗试验出现时间：合干、分干法及传统法比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论颈，神经根能提供足够的神经再生纤维，可同时恢复2条神经功能。     

二期多组神经移位治疗臂丛神经根性撕脱伤的临床应用和疗效

目的 分析治疗臂丛神经根性撕脱伤的二期手术方法及其效果。方法 2001年8月～2003年4月8例全臂丛神经根性撕脱伤患者，年龄18～38岁。平均伤后6个月内，均应用以下术式治疗。手术步骤：一期手术，膈神经移位至臂丛上干前股，副神经移位至肩胛上神经；健侧C7神经移位至患侧尺神经；二期手术，第4、5、6、7肋间神经移位至桡神经和胸背神经，健侧C7神经经尺神经移位至正中神经。结果 术后8例均获随访，时间为二期术后l3～25个月，平均21个月。所有患者均有不同程度恢复，相应靶肌肉肌力恢复大于或等于M3为有效恢复，肌皮神经有效恢复6例，恢复率为75．0％；肩胛上神经有效恢复3例，恢复率为37．5％；桡神经有效恢复3例，恢复率为37．5％；胸背神经有效恢复6例，恢复率为75．0％；正中神经有效恢复5例，恢复率为62．5％。感觉恢复情况：正中神经感觉4例为S3，3例为S2，1例为S1。结论 二期多组神经移位安全有效，对部分早期臂丛神经损伤并要求缩短手术次数的患者，是一种可选择的方法。     

Nerve transfer for treatment of brachial plexus injury：comparison study between the transfer of partial median and ulnar nerves and that of phrenic and spinal accessary nerves

Objective:To compare the effect of using partial median and ulnar nerves for treatment of C5-6 orC5-7 avulsion of the brachial plexus with that of using phrenic and spinal accessary nerves.Methods:The patients were divided into 2groups randomly according to different surgical procedures.Twelve cases were involved in the first group.The phrenic nerve was transferred to the musculocutaneous nerve or through a sural nerve graft,and the spinal accessary nerve was to the suprascapular nerve.Eleven cases were classified into the second group.A part of the fascicles of median nerve was transferred to be coapted with the motor fascicle of musculocutaneous nerve and a part of fascicles of ulnar nerve was transferred to the axillary nerve.The cases were followed up from 1to 3years and the clinical outcome was compared between the two groups.     

大鼠改良颈7移位术的电生理研究

目的观察改良颈7移位术修复二组受损神经的电生理变化.方法建立大鼠颈7改良移位术模型（同侧颈7神经根后股,经同侧尺神经作为桥接神经分为两股与肌皮神经和正中神经内侧头缝合）,并与传统单组移位组进行神经电生理测定和比较.结果移位神经的各项电生理指标显示：术后早期（2～6周）,颈7二组神经移位组神经再生劣于同时间段单组移位组.随观察时间的延长,术后8周起,二组神经移位组肌电动作电位潜伏期及最大诱发电位波幅指标逐渐接近单组移位组和正常对照组,至12周上述指标与各组差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）.结论大鼠改良颈7移位术电生理变化和传统单组移位术相近,说明颈7具有良好的再生潜力,可同时支配两组受损神经.     

健侧颈_7椎体前路移位直接修复下干联合股薄肌移植治疗臂丛根部撕脱伤

目的 探讨健侧颈7神经椎体前路移位直接修复下干联合功能性股薄肌移植重建术治疗全臂丛根部撕脱伤的手术设计及其临床疗效.方法 12例全臂丛根性撕脱伤患者,于伤后1～3个月行臂丛神经根干部探查,一期健侧颈,经椎体前路移位直接修复患侧C_8T_1-下干,同时行膈神经移位修复肩胛上神经9例.于一期术后4-8个月分别行二期吻合血管的股薄肌移植(以副神经斜方肌支为缝接神经)重建屈肘、伸指伸拇功能.结果 随访9～36个月.一期术后3个月12例患侧尺神经、正中神经Tinel征至上臂近段平面,术后6个月至肘关节与前臂近段平面,9个月至前臂远段与腕部.9例12个月Tinel征至手掌、手指部.7例术后9个月胸大肌胸肋部收缩,12个月肩内收可夹持物品;5例术后15-18个月手掌、手指与前臂内侧均有触痛觉恢复,尺侧腕屈肌和示、中、环、小指屈指肌收缩.3例术后24个月,拇指屈曲,1例鱼际肌出现收缩(M_1).二期股薄肌移植功能重建术后有7例于二期术后4～7个月移植肌肉收缩;9～12个月屈肘90°～120°(M_3),伸指伸拇M_3 .结论 健侧颈_7神经经椎体前路移位直接修复C_8T_1-下干术,联合二期股薄肌移植重建屈肘、伸指伸拇功能治疗全臂丛根部撕脱伤的手术设计具有可操作性,初步观察神经再生进程顺利,能恢复手腕、手指的屈曲与感觉功能,重建屈肘、伸指功能.     

Outcome of contralateral C7 transfer to two recipient nerves in 22 patients with the total brachial plexus avulsion injury

The treatment of total brachial plexus avulsion injury is difficult with unfavorable prognosis. This report presents our experience on the contralateral C7 (CC7) nerve root transfer to neurotize two recipient nerves in the patients with total BPAI. Twenty‐two patients underwent CC7 transfer to two target nerves in the injured upper limb. The patients' ages ranged from 13 to 48 years. The entire CC7 was transferred to pedicled ulnar nerve in the first stage. The interval between trauma and surgery ranged from 1 to 13 months. The ulnar nerve was transferred to recipients (median nerve and biceps branch or median nerve and triceps branch) at 2–13 months after first operation. The motor recovery of wrist and finger flexor to M3 or greater was achieved in 68.2% of patients, the sensory recovery of median nerve area recovered to S3 or greater in 45.5% of patients. The functional recovery of elbow flexor to M3 or greater was achieved in 66.7% of patients with repair of biceps branch and 20% of patients with repair of the triceps branch (P < 0.05). There were no statistical differences in median nerve function recovery at comparisons of the age younger and older than 20‐years‐old and the intervals between trauma and surgery. In conclusion, the use of CC7 transfer for repair two recipient nerves might be an option for treatment of total BPAI. The functional recovery of the repaired biceps branch appeared to be better than that of the triceps branch. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 33:605–611, 2013.     

Repair of brachial plexus lesions by end-to-side side-to-side grafting neurorrhaphy: experience based on 11 cases

Eleven brachial plexus lesions were repaired using end-to-side side-to-side grafting neurorrhaphy in root ruptures, in phrenic and spinal accessory nerve neurotizations, in contralateral C7 neurotization, and in neurotization using intact interplexus roots or cords. The main aim was to approximate donor and recipient nerves and promote regeneration through them. Another indication was to augment the recipient nerve, when it had been neurotized or grafted to donors of dubious integrity, when it was not completely denervated, when it had been neurotized to a nerve with a suboptimal number of fibers, when it had been neurotized to distant donors delaying its regeneration, and when it had been neurotized to a donor supplying many recipients. In interplexus neurotization, the main indication was to preserve the integrity of the interplexus donors, as they were not sacrificeable. The principles of end-to-side neurorrhaphy were followed. The epineurium was removed. Axonal sprouting was induced by longitudinally slitting and partially transecting the donor and recipient nerves, by increasing the contact area between both of them and the nerve grafts, and by embedding the grafts into the split predegenerated injured nerve segments. Agonistic donors were used for root ruptures and for phrenic and spinal accessory neurotization, but not for contralateral C7 or interplexus neurotization. Single-donor single-recipient neurotization was successfully followed in phrenic neurotization of the suprascapular (3 cases) and axillary (1 case) nerves, spinal accessory neurotization of the suprascapular nerve (1 case), and dorsal part of contralateral C7 neurotization of the axillary nerve (2 cases). Apart from this, recipient augmentation necessitated many donor to single-recipient neurotizations. This was successfully performed using phrenic-interplexus root to suprascapular transfers (2 cases), phrenic-contralateral C7 to suprascapular transfer (1 case), and spinal accessory-interplexus root to musculocutaneous transfer (1 case). Both recipient augmentation and increasing the contact area between grafts and recipients necessitated single or multiple donor to many recipient neurotizations. This was applied in root ruptures (3 cases), with results comparable to those obtained in classical nerve-grafting techniques. It was also applied in ventral C7 transfer to the lateral or medial cords (3 cases) with functional recovery occurring in the biceps and pronator teres muscles, but not in dorsal C7 transfer to the axillary and radial nerves (3 cases) with functional recovery occurring in the deltoid and triceps muscles, and in whole C7 transfer to C5, 6, 7, 8T1 roots with functional recovery occurring in the deltoid (M4), biceps (M4), pronator teres (M4), and triceps (M3) (3 cases), and less so in the flexor carpi ulnaris and FDP (M3) (1 case) and the extensor digitorum longus (M3) (1 case). Contralateral C7 transfer to the lateral and posterior cords (4 cases) was followed by cocontractions that took 1 year to improve and that involved the rotator cuff, deltoid, biceps, and pronator teres (all agonists). Functional recovery in the triceps muscle was less than in the above muscles. Contralateral C7 transfer to C5-7 (1 case) was followed by cocontractions that took 1 year to resolve and that occurred between the deltoid, biceps, and flexor digitorum profundus. Interplexus root neurotization was done only in conjunction with other neurotization techniques, and so its role is difficult to judge. Though the same applies to regenerated lateral cord transfer to the posterior cord (2 cases), the successful results obtained from medial cord neurotization to the axillary, musculocutaneous, and radial nerves (1 case), and from ulnar and median nerve neurotization to the radial nerve (1 case), show that neurotization at the interplexus cord level may play a role in brachial plexus regeneration and may even be used to neurotize nerves and muscles distal to the elbow. The timing of repair was within 6 months after injury, except for 2 cases. In the first case, contralateral C7 transfer was successfully performed more than 1 year after injury. The second case was an obstetric palsy operated upon at age 8. Deterioration in motor power of the donor muscles that improved in 6 months was observed in 2 cases of interplexus neurotization at the cord level, because of looping the sural nerve grafts tightly around the donor nerves. Deterioration in donor-muscle motor power as a consequence of end-to-side neurorrhaphy was noted in the obstetric palsy case, when the flexor carpi radialis (donor) became grade 3 instead of grade 4. This was associated with cocontractions between it and the extensors. It took nearly 1 year to improve.     

肌电图-神经电图测定健侧颈_7神经根移位桥接至受体神经后再生的临床研究

目的　用肌电图 -神经电图检测方法 ,研究健侧颈 7神经根移位通过桥接至受体神经后再生的状况。方法　 1996年 3月至 1998年 9月 ,对 2 8例健侧颈 7移位二期手术后患者 ,定期进行肌电图 -神经电图随访。术后随访时间为 3～ 5 8个月 ,平均 15 .4个月。分别在胸锁关节、胸腋部、腋部、肘部或外侧肌间隔刺激受体神经 (肌皮神经、桡神经和正中神经 ) ,于该神经支配的相应肌肉上记录复合肌肉动作电位 (CMAP) ,测定其潜伏期 (L at)、波幅 (Amp)。计算出动力神经纤维在受体神经的运动传导速度(MNCV) ,并观察其肌电图表现。结果　患侧桡、肌皮和正中神经支配的相应肌肉 ,分别在术后 4、6和 12个月时检测到神经再生电位。结论　健侧颈7神经根移位后 ,受体神经中出现再生电位最早的为肌皮神经 ,桡神经次之 ,正中神经最晚     

胸腔镜视下切取膈神经移位治疗臂丛神经损伤的临床应用报告

目的 首创在胸腔镜视下切断膈神经远端移接于肌皮神经的新术式。方法 临床应用５例。在胸腔镜视下于人膈肌近端切断膈神经,游离在胸腔内的膈神经全长。膈神经自锁骨上抽出经皮下引至肌皮神经３例,于锁骨下自第二肋间引起移位于肌皮神经２例。移接于肌皮神经主干２例,移接于肌皮神经肌支３例。首例于术后１１０ｄ,检测肱二头肥肥电图出现再生电位。结论 胸腔镜视下切并游离胸腔内膈神经全长,是膈神经移位术中切取膈神经的最佳