抗病毒药物对肝组织乙型肝炎病毒共价闭合环状DNA的影响

目的 探讨抗病毒药物对肝组织HBV共价闭合环状DNA(cccDNA)的影响.方法 71例HBeAg阳性的慢性乙型肝炎患者分别接受48周的拉米夫定-干扰素序贯治疗、单用拉米夫定治疗和24周的干扰素治疗,随访24周.检测治疗前、后肝组织HBV DNA和cccDNA水平;检测治疗前、后及停药24周时的血清HBV DNA和ALT水平.比较C、B基因型HBV感染患者肝组织HBV DNA和cccDNA水平.结果 治疗结束时,序贯治疗、拉米夫定治疗和干扰素治疗组患者肝组织HBV DNA分别为(4.7±1.1)log10、(4.6±1.5)log10和(5.6±1.5)log10,均低于治疗前水平(P＜0.05);cccDNA分别为(3.4±1.3)log10、(3.8±1.1)log10和(5.0±1.5)log10,均低于治疗前水平(P＜0.05).17例患者出现了HBeAg血清学转换,其肝组织cccDNA下降幅度明显大于HBeAg阳性患者(3.0 log10比1.6 log10,P＜0.05).停药24周,18例患者获得持续病毒学应答,其cccDNA基线值明显低于停药后出现病毒反跳患者(P＜0.05).肝组织cccDNA的变化与肝组织HBV DNA的改变正相关(P＜0.05);治疗结束时,肝组织cccDNA水平与血清HBeAg滴度正相关(P＜0.01).C基因型与B基因型HBV感染患者治疗前、后肝组织HBV DNA和cccDNA的变化无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 48周的拉米夫定-干扰素序贯治疗和拉米夫定治疗对肝组织cccDNA抑制作用强于24周的干扰素治疗.肝组织cccDNA低水平患者易获得较好的抗病毒疗效.HBV基因型对肝组织cccDNA含量无明显影响.     

Intrahepatic HBV DNA as a predictor of antivirus treatment efficacy in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients

AIM: To evaluate the effect of antiviral agents on intrahepatic HBV DNA in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients. METHODS: Seventy-one patients received treatment with lamivudine, interferon alpha (IFN-alpha 2b) or sequential therapy with lamivudine-IFN-alpha 2b for 48 wk. All subjects were followed up for 24 wk. Serum and intrahepatic HBV DNA were measured quantitatively by PCR. HBV genotypes were analyzed by PCR-RFLP. RESULTS: At the end of treatment, the intrahepatic HBV DNA level in 71 patients decreased from a mean of (6.1 +/- 1.0) log10 to (4.9 +/- 1.4) log10. Further, a larger decrease was seen in the intrahepatic HBV DNA level in patients with HBeAg seroconversion. Intrahepatic HBV DNA level (before and after treatment) was not significantly affected by the patients' HBV genotype, or by the probability of virological flare after treatment. CONCLUSION: Intrahepatic HBV DNA can be effectively lowered by antiviral agents and is a significant marker for monitoring antivirus treatment. Low intrahepatic HBV DNA level may achieve better efficacy of antivirus treatment.     

Intrahepatic hepatitis B virus covalently closed circular DNA can be a predictor of sustained response to therapy

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study aimed to determine whether intrahepatic hepatitis B virus (HBV) covalently closed circular (ccc) DNA and total HBV DNA levels at the end of therapy would predict sustained response to therapy. METHODS: Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B patients receiving either lamivudine monotherapy or combination of peginterferon and lamivudine had liver biopsy at the end of 1 year therapy and were followed for 52 more weeks after cessation of therapy. Serum HBV DNA, intrahepatic HBV ccc DNA, and total HBV DNA levels were determined. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients, including 34 males and 13 females, were studied. Twenty-seven patients received combination therapy, and 20 patients received lamivudine monotherapy. Twenty-nine patients had end-of-treatment virologic response, and 15 patients had sustained response 52 weeks after therapy. At the end of treatment, log serum HBV DNA levels correlated well with log intrahepatic HBV cccDNA and log intrahepatic total HBV DNA levels. Log intrahepatic cccDNA and log intrahepatic total DNA levels were significantly lower among patients with sustained virologic response. The adjusted odds ratio for log cccDNA was 5.3 (95% CI: 1.5-18.2, P = .009) and, for log intrahepatic HBV DNA, was 4.4 (95% CI: 1.3-14.7, P = .015) to predict sustained virologic response. Using log cccDNA at -0.80 copies/genome equivalent as cutoff, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of predicting sustained virologic response were 73%, 78%, 56%, 86%, and 77% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intrahepatic HBV cccDNA and intrahepatic total HBV DNA levels at the end of therapy are superior to serum HBV DNA as surrogates of sustained virologic response.     

联合核苷类药物治疗干扰素应答不佳的慢性乙型肝炎时机选择及疗效研究

目的：探讨干扰素治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎时,联合核苷（酸）类药物的不同时机对治疗应答的影响。方法：观察干扰素治疗患者分别在治疗起始时联合阿德福韦酯、12周应答不佳者及24周应答不佳者联合拉米夫定最终各组疗效。结果：48周时及停药后24周时,起始时联合阿德福韦酯治疗组及12周应答不佳者联合拉米夫定组患者的病毒转阴率、 ALT复常率、 HBeAg转阴率均高于对照组（ P＜0.05）,而HBeAg转换率并未有明显提高（ P＞0.05）。结论：治疗起始干扰素联合阿德福韦酯或根据12周应答情况加用拉米夫定治疗均能一定程度提高治疗应答率。     

Sequential treatment with lamivudine and interferon monotherapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B not responding to interferon alone: results of a pilot study

Sustained viral suppression using monotherapy with interferon alfa (IFN-alpha) or lamivudine can only be achieved in a small percentage of patients with chronic hepatitis B. The concomitant administration of lamivudine and IFN-alpha does not enhance efficacy. We postulated that the optimal timing of therapy might be sequential treatment with lamivudine and IFN-alpha. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the efficacy of sequential treatment in patients resistant to IFN-alpha alone. Fourteen male patients, with a median age of 40 years, nonresponders to IFN-alpha with hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA > 100 pg/mL (branched DNA [bDNA] Chiron) and positive hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) in 11 of 14 patients, were treated with lamivudine 100 mg/d alone for 20 weeks, then with both IFN-alpha2b 5 MU 3 times per week and lamivudine for 4 weeks, and lastly with IFN-alpha alone for 24 weeks. At the end of lamivudine therapy, all patients had undetectable serum HBV DNA, and none exhibited an emergence of HBV polymerase mutant or breakthrough. Sustained serum HBV-DNA clearance 6 months after the end of sequential treatment was achieved in 8 of 14 patients, HBeAg-to-anti-HBe seroconversion in 5 of 11 patients, and HBeAg and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroconversions in 3 of 14 patients (anti-HBs > 100 IU/mL). All sustained responders had normalized their alanine transaminase (ALT) values and exhibited histologic improvements. In conclusion, the results of this pilot study suggest that sequential treatment with lamivudine and IFN-alpha can induce a sustained virologic response, including HBs seroconversion, in patients with chronic hepatitis B not responding to IFN-alpha alone, without the selection of drug-resistant mutants. This therapeutic schedule warrants further evaluation in clinical trials.     

Early response to lamivudine therapy in clinically non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B patients with decompensation.

This study aimed to elucidate the rate and predictors of early (6 months) therapeutic responses to lamivudine, the rate of early mortality and the use of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and Index in predicting the survival in patients with a clinical diagnosis of non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis B with decompensation. Ninety-eight patients with lamivudine therapy were enrolled and MELD and Index scores were calculated. Surviving patients were treated with lamivudine for more than 6 months. Four (4.1%) of the 98 patients died after initiation of lamivudine therapy. After a 6-month lamivudine therapy, 80 (85.1%) patients and 71 (75.5%) patients had normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values and negative hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (<200 copies/mL), respectively, and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative patients had a significantly higher rate of negative HBV DNA than HBeAg-positive patients (P=0.002). The rates of HBeAg seroconversion and negative HBV DNA were 28.8 and 63.5%, respectively, and patients with HBeAg seroconversion had a significantly higher rate of negative HBV DNA (P=0.004). By multivariate analyses, older age, HBV nongenotype B infection, negative HBeAg and higher ALT levels were factors associated with negative HBV DNA, and a higher ALT level was associated with HBeAg seroconversion at month 6 after lamivudine therapy. MELD score and Index score were significantly associated with death and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting survival were 0.936 and 0.907 respectively. We concluded that after 6-month lamivudine therapy, the patients who survived achieved favourable biochemical, virological responses and rate of HBeAg seroconversion. Both MELD and Index scoring systems are good models to predict the 6-month survival.     

拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎的疗效影响因素

目的 探讨拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎患者的疗效影响因素,并初步评价基线特征、24周早期病毒学应答及治疗方案对疗效和病毒学突破(VB)发生率的影响.方法 对接受拉米夫定治疗的233例慢性乙型肝炎患者(其中90例治疗期间加用或换用阿德福韦酯)的专科门诊病历资料进行回顾性分析,采用聚合酶链反应法、酶联免疫吸附法分别检测HBV DNA水平与HBsAg、抗-HBs,HBeAg,抗-HBe水平.用SPSS17.0统计软件通过Kaplan-Meier法描述生存时间分布,并分析基线HBV DNA水平,HBeAg状态、ALT水平和疗效的关系.计量资料用t检验分析,计数资料用x2检验.结果 HBeAg阳性与HBeAg阴性患者HBV DNA阴转率分别为63.4%和84.6%,ALT复常率分别为83.8%和81.3%,VB发生率分别为31.0%和14.3%;60.6%的HBeAg阳性患者出现HBeAg阴转,28.9%出现HBeAg/抗-HBe血清学转换.HBeAg阳性患者中,与基线ALT<2.5×正常值上限(ULN)者比较,≥2.5×ULN者HBV DNA阴转率无明显变化(P>0.05),而HBeAg阴转率(66.7%与45.0%)和HBeAg血清学转换率(33.3%与17.5%)明显升高(P值均<0.05),VB发生率则明显下降(34.3%与50.0%,P<0.05),基线HBV DNA<1×106拷贝/ml者VB发生率为23.4%,与HBV DNA≥1×106拷贝/ml者的46.3%比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).HBeAg阳性患者24周有初始病毒学应答(IVR)者的HBV DNA阴转率(76.3%与45.5%)、HBeAg阴转率(72.4%与43.9%)和HBeAg血清学转换率(40.8%与12.1%)均明显高于无IVR者(P值均<0.01),VB发生率较低(28.9%与45.5%,P<0.05).出现VB后,与单一拉米夫定组比较,加药或换药组中HBeAg阳性者HBV DNA阴转率(40.6%与16.7%)、HBeAg血清学转换率(21.9%与0)较高,HBeAg阴转率(37.5%与41.7%)较低,ALT复常率无差别(均为75%);而HBeAg阴性患者的HBV DNA阴转率、ALT复常率较高.结论 拉米夫定抗病毒疗效确切,基线ALT≥2.5×ULN和(或)HBV DNA水平<1×106拷贝/ml的患者疗效较好,VB发生率较低,24周IVR对拉米夫定疗效有预测价值;出现VB后,加用或者换用阿德福韦酯比继续单用拉米夫定治疗的效果好.     

Adding interferon to lamivudine enhances the early virologic response and reversion of the precore mutation in difficult-to-treat HBV infection

BACKGROUND: The virologic impact of adding interferon to antiviral nucleoside therapy was studied in Japanese patients having perinatally transmitted hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype C. METHODS: Sixty-four patients including 41 positive for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) were assigned to receive either (1) a combination of interferon-alpha (6 million units daily for 2 weeks, then three times weekly) plus lamivudine (100 mg daily) for 24 weeks followed by lamivudine alone for 28 weeks (n = 30) or (2) 52-week lamivudine monotherapy (n = 34). RESULTS: The combination treatment enhanced the early virologic response, and HBV clearance was more frequent at week 8 for patients with baseline HBV DNA < or = 7 log copies/ml (90% vs. 33%, P = 0.013) and at week 24 for patients with baseline HBV DNA > 7 log copies/ml (75% vs. 40%, P = 0.080). In the combination arm, YMDD mutants emerged less often at week 52 (8% vs. 30%, P = 0.047). However, reversion of the precore mutation was more prominent with combination treatment than with monotherapy (McNemar test, P = 0.014 and P = 0.103, respectively). HBeAg seroconversion (P = 0.429) and sustained off-treatment HBV suppression to < or =5 log copies/ml (log-rank test, P = 0.195) were not improved. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous commencement of treatment with interferon and a nucleoside analog may be worthy as a treatment option to augment the early virologic response and prevent drug resistance in difficult-to-treat patients. Combination treatment was also shown to enhance reversion of the precore mutation. Further studies are warranted to clarify the therapeutic implications of this phenomenon.     

Effect of lowering HBV DNA levels by initial antiviral therapy before adding immunomodulator on treatment of chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND: Lower hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV DNA) levels are associated with better responses in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). It is unclear whether an initial phase of antiviral treatment to lower HBV DNA levels before adding immunomodulator therapy is more effective than the strategy of using immunomodulators from the beginning. AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of lamivudine followed by pegylated-interferon (peg-IFN) therapy with placebo followed by peg-IFN therapy in HBeAg-positive CHB patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-three treatment-naive HBeAg-positive patients with histologically proven CHB and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 1.2 x upper limit of normal (ULN) received placebo for 4 wk followed by peg-IFN 1.0 mug/kg/wk for next 24 wk (group A, N = 27; age 32 +/- 11 yr; M:F = 25:2) or lamivudine 100 mg per day for 4 wk followed by peg-IFN 1.0 mug/kg/wk for next 24 wk (group B, N = 36; age 32.5 +/- 10.5 yr; M:F = 31:5). Patients were followed for next 24 wk after completion of treatment. Biochemical and virologic responses were assessed at weeks 4, 28, and 52 and analysis was done on intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: At wk 4, mean +/- SD of log change in DNA from baseline was 0.2594 +/- 1.7873 in group A and 1.2186 +/- 1.6347 in group B, respectively (P = 0.032). At week 28, undetectable HBV DNA was seen in eight (29.6%) and 16 (44.4%) patients in groups A and B, respectively (P= 0.298). At week 28, HBeAg loss occurred in eight (29.6%) in group A and 15 (41.7%) in group B (P = 0.43). Six months posttherapy, at week 52, undetectable HBV DNA was seen in four (14.8%) and 18 (50%) in groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.028) and HBeAg loss was maintained in four (14.8%) and 14 (38.9%) (P = 0.05) patients. Normal ALT was seen in five (18.5%) and 10 (27.8%) at week 28 (P = 0.552) and five (18.5%) and 13 (36.1%) at week 52 (P = 0.159) in groups A and B, respectively. There was a significant correlation among achievement of HBeAg loss, anti-HBe appearance, and undetectable HBV DNA levels at week 28 (P = 0.008) and 52 (P < 0.001) and HBV DNA levels at week 4. CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of using an antiviral initially to decrease HBV DNA levels before adding an immunomodulatory agent leads to improved sustained virological response as compared with using immunomodulator from the start.     

Durability of HBeAg seroconversion following antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B: relation to type of therapy and pretreatment serum hepatitis B virus DNA and alanine aminotransferase

Background and aims: Interferon (IFN) induced hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion is durable in 80-90% of chronic hepatitis B patients. Preliminary reports on the durability of HBeAg seroconversion following lamivudine are contradictory. We investigated the durability of response following IFN, lamivudine, or IFN-lamivudine combination therapy in a meta-analysis of individual patient data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty four centres included 130 patients in total with an HBeAg seroconversion (HBeAg negative, antibodies to hepatitis B e antigen positive) at the end of antiviral therapy: 59 with lamivudine, 49 with interferon, and 22 with combination therapy. Relapse was defined as confirmed reappearance of HBeAg. RESULTS: The three year cumulative HBeAg relapse rate by the Kaplan-Meier method was 54% for lamivudine, 32% for IFN, and 23% for combination therapy (p=0.01). Cox regression analysis identified pretreatment hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), sex, and therapy as independent predictive factors of post-treatment relapse; Asian race, previous therapy, centre, and type of study were not predictive of relapse. The relative HBeAg relapse risk of lamivudine compared with IFN therapy was 4.6 and that of combination therapy to IFN therapy 0.7 (p(overall)=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The durability of HBeAg seroconversion following lamivudine treatment was significantly lower than that following IFN or IFN-lamivudine combination therapy. The risk of relapse after HBeAg seroconversion was also related to pretreatment levels of serum ALT and HBV DNA, but independent of Asian race.     

Predicting response to peginterferon alpha-2a, lamivudine and the two combined for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

OBJECTIVE: In a trial of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B, 24 week post-treatment biochemical and virological response rates with peginterferon alpha-2a with or without lamivudine were significantly higher than with lamivudine alone. The effect of pre-treatment factors on post-treatment responses was investigated. METHODS: Multivariate analyses were performed using available data from 518 patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2a with or without lamivudine, or with lamivudine alone. A post-treatment response was defined as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalisation and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level of <20,000 copies/ml. RESULTS: In logistic regression analyses across all treatment arms, peginterferon alpha-2a (with or without lamivudine) therapy, younger age, female gender, high baseline ALT, low baseline HBV DNA and HBV genotype were identified as significant predictors of combined response at 24 weeks post-treatment. In the peginterferon alpha-2a and lamivudine monotherapy arms, patients with genotypes B or C had a higher chance of response than genotype D infected patients (p<0.001), the latter responding better to the combination than to peginterferon alpha-2a monotherapy (p = 0.015). At 1 year post-treatment, response rates by intention-to-treat analysis were 19.2% for the peginterferon alpha-2a, 19.0% for the combination, and 10.0% for the lamivudine groups, with genotypes B or C associated with a sustained combined response to peginterferon alpha-2a with or without lamivudine therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline ALT and HBV DNA levels, patient age, gender, and infecting HBV genotype significantly influenced combined response at 24 weeks post-treatment, in patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2a and/or lamivudine. At 1 year post-treatment HBV genotype was significantly predictive of efficacy for patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2a with or without lamivudine.     

Lamivudine and alpha interferon combination treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B infection: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND, AIM, AND METHODS: Alpha interferon is the generally approved therapy for HBe antigen positive patients with chronic hepatitis B, but its efficacy is limited. Lamivudine is a new oral nucleoside analogue which potently inhibits hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA replication. To investigate the possibility of an additive effect of interferon-lamivudine combination therapy compared with interferon or lamivudine monotherapy, we conducted a randomised controlled trial in 230 predominantly Caucasian patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and HBV DNA positive chronic hepatitis B. Previously untreated patients were randomised to receive: combination therapy of lamivudine 100 mg daily with alpha interferon 10 million units three times weekly for 16 weeks after pretreatment with lamivudine for eight weeks (n=75); alpha interferon 10 million units three times weekly for 16 weeks (n=69); or lamivudine 100 mg daily for 52 weeks (n=82). The primary efficacy end point was the HBeAg seroconversion rate at week 52 (loss of HBeAg, development of antibodies to HBeAg and undetectable HBV DNA). RESULTS: The HBeAg seroconversion rate at week 52 was 29% for the combination therapy, 19% for interferon monotherapy, and 18% for lamivudine monotherapy (p=0.12 and p=0.10, respectively, for comparison of the combination therapy with interferon or lamivudine monotherapy). The HBeAg seroconversion rates at week 52 for the combination therapy and lamivudine monotherapy were significantly different in the per protocol analysis (36% (20/56) v 19% (13/70), respectively; p=0.02). The effect of combining lamivudine and interferon appeared to be most useful in patients with moderately elevated alanine aminotransferase levels at baseline. Adverse events with the combination therapy were similar to interferon monotherapy; patients receiving lamivudine monotherapy had significantly fewer adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: HBeAg seroconversion rates at one year were similar for lamivudine monotherapy (52 weeks) and standard alpha interferon therapy (16 weeks). The combination of lamivudine and interferon appeared to increase the HBeAg seroconversion rate, particularly in patients with moderately elevated baseline aminotransferase levels. The potential benefit of combining lamivudine and interferon should be investigated further in studies with different regimens of combination therapy.     

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay for serum hepatitis B virus DNA as a predictive factor for post-treatment relapse after lamivudine induced hepatitis B e antigen loss or seroconversion

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Lamivudine induces favourable virological and biochemical responses but post-treatment relapses are frequent, even in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss or seroconversion. The aim of this study was to determine whether extended lamivudine therapy for up to 12 months after HBeAg loss/seroconversion could decrease the risk of post-treatment virological relapse. In addition, we monitored serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay during extended lamivudine therapy and analysed predictive factors for post-treatment relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 49 patients who exhibited HBeAg loss/seroconversion during lamivudine therapy received extended lamivudine therapy for six months (group 1, n=23) or 12 months (group 2, n=26) after HBeAg loss/seroconversion. Serum HBV DNA levels were quantified by a PCR based assay at the time of HBeAg loss/seroconversion, and at cessation of therapy. RESULTS: Post-treatment virological relapse rates at two years were 59% in group 1 and 50% in group 2. Age, time interval to HBeAg loss/seroconversion, and serum HBV DNA levels at the time of cessation of therapy were independent predictive factors for post-treatment relapse. The post-treatment relapse rate was 37% at two years in patients with serum HBV DNA levels of <200 copies/ml but 73% in those with > or =10(3) copies/ml. CONCLUSIONS: Extended lamivudine therapy for up to 12 months did not decrease the rate of post-treatment virological relapse, and monitoring of serum HBV DNA by a quantitative PCR method was helpful in predicting post-treatment relapse.     

恩替卡韦治疗拉米夫定失效的慢性乙型肝炎患者5年的临床疗效

目的 评价恩替卡韦(ETV)对重庆地区拉米夫定治疗失效的慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者5年的疗效和安全性.方法 选取拉米夫定治疗失效的CHB患者32例,随机分为ETV组(剂量1.0 mg/d)28例和安慰剂组4例,完成12周的双盲治疗后,患者均接受开放的ETV(剂量1.0 mg/d)治疗,持续治疗至240周.分别检测治疗2、4、8、12、24、48、96、144、168、240周时患者的血清HBV DNA水平、HBsAg与HBeAg状态和肝功能情况.双盲阶段HBV DNA水平变化情况经Mauchly"球对称"检验后采用重复测量数据方差分析;连续性变量的统计描述用均数±标准差(x±s)表示.结果 在接受ETV治疗后,12周时ETV组患者血清HBV DNA水平平均下降4.05 log10拷贝/ml,安慰剂组平均下降0.08 log10拷贝/ml(P<0.05).治疗240周时,ETV组患者HBV DNA水平均值下降至2.58 log10拷贝/ml.HBV DNA<3 log10拷贝/ml患者的百分比在治疗前为0,从第8周开始上升(6.25%),24周时为15.6%,尤其在96周明显上升(50%),到240周末为57.14%.240周末有2例出现HBsAg血清学转换,4例出现HBeAg血清学转换.服用ETV后ALT水平下降较迅速,12周后均数达正常水平,且5年持续低于40 U/L.5年治疗期间,患者不良事件发生率为21%,有1例出现严重不良事件. 结论 ETV(1.0 mg/d)治疗拉米夫定失效的CHB患者具有显著的抗病毒和临床疗效,且安全性及耐受性良好.     

Treatment of hepatitis B with lamivudine and tenofovir in HIV/HBV-coinfected patients: factors associated with response

As therapy for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection evolves, optimizing hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatment and identifying factors that impact its response in the HIV/HBV-coinfected population is critical. We identified retrospectively 45 HBV/HIV-coinfected patients with detectable HBV DNA by the Bayer VERSANT HBV 3.0 bDNA assay (limit of quantification 2000 copies/mL) at baseline and/or year 1 of therapy. Patients were divided into three groups based on the active HBV agent in their antiretroviral regimen: group 1 (n = 15) received lamivudine; group 2 (n = 10), lamivudine plus tenofovir and group 3 (n = 20), lamivudine followed by lamivudine plus tenofovir. HBV genotypes and resistance profiles were determined by the Bayer Trugene HBV 1.0 assay. More patients in group 2 achieved HBV DNA suppression below 2000 copies/mL (80%), loss of HBe antigen (HBeAg) (40%) and loss of HBeAg and gain of anti-HBe (20%) than did patients in group 1 or 3. More patients with HBV genotype A, achieved HBV DNA suppression <2000 copies/mL than did patients with non-A genotypes [74% (26/35) vs 20% (2/10)], respectively (P = 0.003). Risk for virological nonresponse was significant in those with non-A genotypes [odds ratio (OR) 11.1; 95% CI: 2.0-50], previous HIV therapy (OR 6.5; 95% CI: 1.2-35) and <90% compliance (OR 3.7; 95% CI: 0.99-14.3). Simultaneous therapy with lamivudine/tenofovir suppresses HBV DNA more effectively than lamivudine or tenofovir added to lamivudine. More patients infected with HBV genotype A responded than the non-A patients, regardless of therapeutic regimen, compliance or prior HIV therapy.     

Adefovir dipivoxil alone or in combination with lamivudine in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adefovir dipivoxil possesses potent in vitro and in vivo antiviral activity in wild-type hepatitis B. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil alone and in combination with lamivudine compared with ongoing lamivudine therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B with compensated liver disease and lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV). METHODS: Fifty-nine hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients with genotypic evidence of lamivudine-resistant HBV, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level > or =1.2 times the upper limit of normal, and serum HBV DNA level > or =6 log(10) copies/mL despite ongoing treatment with lamivudine were randomized to adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg, lamivudine 100 mg, or addition of adefovir dipivoxil to ongoing lamivudine daily. The primary end point was the time-weighted average change from baseline in serum HBV DNA level (DAVG) up to week 16. RESULTS: Rapid reductions in serum HBV DNA level were seen by 4 weeks in all recipients of adefovir dipivoxil; DAVG(16) was -0.07 in the lamivudine group compared with -2.45 and -2.46 log(10) copies/mL in the adefovir dipivoxil/lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Median change from baseline in serum HBV DNA level at week 48 was 0.0, -3.59, and -4.04 log(10) copies/mL in the lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil/lamivudine, and adefovir dipivoxil groups, respectively. ALT level normalized in 10 of 19 (53%) and 9 of 18 (47%) recipients of adefovir dipivoxil/lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil, respectively, compared with 1 of 19 (5%) recipients of lamivudine. Three patients receiving adefovir dipivoxil or adefovir dipivoxil/lamivudine and none receiving lamivudine monotherapy were HBeAg negative at week 48 and one became hepatitis B surface antigen negative. CONCLUSIONS: These data, limited to patients with compensated liver disease, indicate that adefovir dipivoxil alone or in combination with ongoing lamivudine therapy provides effective antiviral therapy in patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV.     

慢性乙型肝炎患者肝细胞内乙型肝炎核心抗原阳性的临床意义

目的探讨CHB患者肝组织HBcAg阳性的意义。方法对200例CHB患者应用荧光聚合酶链反应（FQ-PCR）法精确定量检测血清HBV DNA含量。患者均检测血清中HBeAg含量,同时进行肝活组织检查,应用免疫组织化学技术检测HBcAg情况,并进行相关性分析。结果按测定血清HBV DNA水平,分为A组（＜3 log10拷贝/ml）20例,B组（≥3 log10拷贝/ml-＜5 log10拷贝/ml）13例,C组（≥5 log10拷贝/ml～＜6 log10拷贝/ml）24例,D组（≥6 log10拷贝/ml～＜8 log10拷贝/ml）116例,E组（≥8 log10拷贝/ml）27例。肝组织HBcAg阳性者175例,占87．5％,A组HBcAg阳性率55．0％（11/20）,B组53．8％（7/13）,C组75．0％（18/24）,D组96．6％（112/116）,E组100．0％（27/27）,HBcAg阳性率与血清HBV DNA水平之间呈显著正相关（r=0．80,P＜0．01）。血清HBV DNA水平高低与HBeAg阳性率之间呈显著正相关（r=0．47,P＜0．01）。其中20例HBV DNA阴性者中（A组）,HBeAg阳性者5例（25％）,HBcAg阳性者11例（55％）；15例HBV DNA阴性且HBeAg阴性者中有7例HBcAg阳性,占46．7％。结论CHB患者肝组织HBcAg阳性能更可靠地反映肝细胞内HBV复制状态。检测肝组织内HBcAg对CHB患者疗效评价和对治疗反应性的预测更具有临床意义。     

Lamivudine and famciclovir combination therapy with or without addition of interferon-alpha-2b for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B: a pilot study

Lamivudine and famciclovir combination therapy has been used in patients with chronic HBeAg-positive hepatitis B to enhance the antiviral effect and reduce the risk of development of resistance. Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) can theoretically be added to the regimen to further improve the antiviral effect. Twenty patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B were given lamivudine and famciclovir combination therapy for 24 weeks. After 12 weeks of treatment, patients were randomized on a 1:1 basis to either the addition of IFN-alpha 2b or no addition for the last 3 months of therapy. The decline in HBV DNA levels, the loss of HBeAg and the HBeAg seroconversion rate were assessed. Patients with loss of HBeAg and/or development of anti-HBe were followed up for at least 1 y after stopping treatment. Four of 19 patients (21%) had lost HBeAg and/or developed anti-HBe 24 weeks after stopping treatment, 1 of whom had received additional IFN-alpha. During long-term follow-up post-treatment, 2/19 patients (10.5%) had a durable HBeAg seroconversion. The mean HBV DNA level declined by 5 logs during the first 12 weeks of treatment. Addition of IFN-alpha during the last 3 months of treatment did not result in any further decline in HBV DNA levels compared with the non-IFN-alpha-treated group, nor in any increase in the HBeAg seroconversion rate. In conclusion, lamivudine and famciclovir combination treatment induced seroconversion from HBeAg to anti-HBe in 4/19 patients, 2 of whom became long-term responders. Addition of IFN-alpha did not improve the seroconversion rate.     

Long-term follow-up of peginterferon and lamivudine combination treatment in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B

We have previously demonstrated that combination peginterferon and lamivudine treatment has superior antiviral efficacy to lamivudine monotherapy in chronic hepatitis B. In this study, we investigated the long-term posttreatment virological response to this combination treatment. Sustained virological response of patients who completed 32-week peginterferon and 52-week lamivudine combination treatment was compared to patients who completed 52-week lamivudine monotherapy. Sustained response was defined as sustained hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss and HBV DNA < 100,000 copies/mL from treatment cessation until the end of follow-up. Forty-eight patients receiving combination treatment and 47 patients receiving lamivudine monotherapy were studied. The posttreatment follow-up of patients who received combination treatment was 117 +/- 34 weeks and that of patients receiving lamivudine monotherapy was 124 +/- 29 weeks. At the end of treatment, HBeAg loss occurred in 63% of patients in the combination group and 28% of patients in the lamivudine group (P = .001). The probabilities of sustained response for combination treatment and lamivudine monotherapy were 33% and 13% at week 24, 31% and 11% at week 52, and 29% and 9% at week 76, respectively (log-rank test, P = .0015). No patients developed virological relapse after week 76 until the last visit in either treatment group. All sustained responders had no biochemical relapse (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] > 2 times upper limit of normal) during follow-up. Among the non-sustained responders, biochemical relapse occurred in 32 patients (94%) in the combination group and 38 patients (88%) in the lamivudine group, respectively. In conclusion, combination treatment of peginterferon and lamivudine has a higher sustained virological response than lamivudine monotherapy up to 3 years after treatment.     

拉米夫定治疗HBeAg阳性慢性乙型肝炎患者血清转换持久性的研究

目的观察拉米夫定长期治疗慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)3年以上患者的血清转换率和停药后持久率,及影响疗效的有关因素.方法167例CHB患者,每天服用拉米夫定100mg,持续3年以上,连续2次以上出现血清转换(间隔3个月),即HBeAg转阴和抗HBe转阳,继续服药6～12个月后,停药并随访1年以上.服药第1年每月,以后第3个月观察临床症状和血清病毒学标志、丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、HBV DNA定量及YMDD变异等项目.HBV基因分型应用型特异性PCR方法.结果共有45例患者出现血清转换(27.0%),继续服药6～12个月后停药并随访1年以上,9例出现血清学重新激活,血清转换持久率为80.0%.经单因素统计和Logistic多元回归分析,得出血清转换率和停药后持久率与基线ALT水平呈正相关,与基线HBV DNA水平和治疗后YMDD变异呈负相关.结论CHB患者出现血清转换后继续应用拉米夫定治疗6个月以上,大多数患者可达到持续转换.对血清转换率和持久率有显著影响意义的因子为基线ALT、治疗后YMDD变异.