Panic disorder. A long‐term treatment study: fluoxetine vs imipramine

This double‐blind study evaluates the efficacy and tolerability of fluoxetine and imipramine in the acute and long‐term treatment of panic disorder in 38 patients meeting DSM‐IV criteria for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. On the basis of HRSA mean scores evaluation, fluoxetine was found to be quicker than imipramine in reducing generalized anxiety at the end of the first week of treatment. However, through PASS and CGI mean scores evaluation, no statistically significant differences were found at any time in the efficacy of fluoxetine and imipramine on the total number of panic attacks, anticipatory anxiety or phobia severity. Fluoxetine has also turned out to be better tolerated than imipramine and to be effective at dosages low enough to avoid the event of an activation syndrome. Long‐term evaluation has shown high rates of persistent remission with both drugs. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Escitalopram (S‐Enantiomer of Citalopram): Clinical Efficacy and Onset of Action Predicted from a Rat Model

Abstract: Escitalopram is the active S‐enantiomer of citalopram. In a chronic mild stress model of depression in rats, treatments with both escitalopram and citalopram were effective; however, a faster time to onset of efficacy compared to vehicle treatment was observed for escitalopram‐treated (5 mg/kg/day) than for citalopram‐treated (10 mg/kg/day) rats at Week 1. To study the predictability of this observation in the clinic, we analysed 4‐week data from an 8‐week, double‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled, flexible‐dose study that compared escitalopram and citalopram to placebo in primary care patients with major depressive disorder (baseline Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores ≥22 and ≤40). Since the flexible dosing started after Week 4, analysis of 4‐week data ensured that the patients received fixed doses of 10 mg/day escitalopram (155 patients), 20 mg/day citalopram (160 patients), or placebo (154 patients). The efficacy analysis showed a significantly superior therapeutic effect for escitalopram versus placebo from Week 1 onwards (observed cases) with an adjusted mean change in MADRS at Week 4 (last observation carried forward) of 2.7 points (P=0.002). By comparison, 20 mg/day citalopram did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect compared to placebo. Escitalopram was well tolerated with an adverse event profile similar to that of citalopram. The preclinical observation that escitalopram possesses a faster time to onset of efficacy than citalopram was also seen in primary care patients with major depressive disorder. Thus, escitalopram is efficacious in depression and the effect occurs earlier than for citalopram.     

Fluoxetine versus amitriptyline in the treatment of major depression with associated anxiety (anxious depression): a double-blind comparison

Although common in clinical settings, major depressive disorder with associated anxious symptoms ('anxious depression') has not been well studied in antidepressant clinical trials. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of fluoxetine versus amitriptyline in this group of patients. After a single-blind placebo run-in period of 2 weeks, patients were treated on a double-blind basis with fluoxetine or amitriptyline for 8 weeks. Assessment instruments included: 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, Clinical Global Impressions, Raskin Depression Scale and Covi Anxiety Scale. A total of 157 patients were randomized to either fluoxetine or amitriptyline. Fluoxetine was given at a fixed dose of 20 mg/day and amitriptyline was given in a range of 50-250 mg/day (mean of 138.1 mg/day). Fluoxetine was comparable to amitriptyline in all efficacy measures except the HAMD sleep factor. Unwanted effects were more frequent and more severe in the amitriptyline-treated patients. Fluoxetine was comparably efficacious to amitriptyline in the treatment of major depression with associated anxiety. Since fluoxetine was far better tolerated, it is a promising alternative for this frequent and disabling condition.     

An open trial of fluoxetine in the treatment of panic attacks

Fluoxetine is a new antidepressant with pharmacologic effects apparently limited to blockade of neuronal serotonin reuptake. We entered 20 patients who met DSM-III criteria for either panic disorder or agoraphobia with panic attacks into an open, uncontrolled pilot study of fluoxetine. Four responded to placebo in the week before fluoxetine administration and were dropped from the study. Of the remaining 16 patients, nine were nonresponders and seven were responders, with complete cessation of their panic attacks. Eight of the nine nonresponders were unable to tolerate the side effects of fluoxetine. In contrast, all of the responders (and one nonresponder) experienced minimal side effects. Fluoxetine may be effective in the treatment of panic attacks, perhaps implicating the serotonergic system in the pathophysiology of panic disorder. Future studies should use very low doses of fluoxetine to initiate treatment.     

Fluoxetine in panic disorder

Twenty-five patients with a primary DSM-III-R diagnosis of panic disorder with or without agoraphobia were treated openly with the serotonin uptake inhibitor fluoxetine for up to 12 months. For most patients, treatment was initiated at 5 mg/day to minimize adverse effects previously reported with initiation at higher doses. Nineteen (76%) experienced moderate to marked improvement in panic attacks. Four (16%) were unable to tolerate fluoxetine due to adverse effects. Initiating treatment of panic disorder with low doses of fluoxetine may increase its acceptability and permit more patients to benefit from fluoxetine.     

Paroxetine: an update of its use in psychiatric disorders in adults

Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), with antidepressant and anxiolytic activity. In 6- to 24-week well designed trials, oral paroxetine 10 to 50 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo, at least as effective as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and as effective as other SSRIs and other antidepressants in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Relapse or recurrence over 1 year after the initial response was significantly lower with paroxetine 10 to 50 mg/day than with placebo and similar to that with imipramine 50 to 275 mg/day. The efficacy of paroxetine 10 to 40 mg/day was similar to that of TCAs and fluoxetine 20 to 60 mg/day in 6- to 12-week trials in patients aged > or =60 years with major depression. Paroxetine 10 to 40 mg/day improved depressive symptoms to an extent similar to that of TCAs in patients with comorbid illness, and was more effective than placebo in the treatment of dysthymia and minor depression. Paroxetine 20 to 60 mg/day was more effective than placebo after 8 to 12 weeks' treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), panic disorder, social anxiety disorder (social phobia), generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Improvement was maintained or relapse was prevented for 24 weeks to 1 year in patients with OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder or GAD. The efficacy of paroxetine was similar to that of other SSRIs in patients with OCD and panic disorder and similar to that of imipramine but greater than that of 2'chlordesmethyldiazepam in patients with GAD. Paroxetine is generally well tolerated in adults, elderly individuals and patients with comorbid illness, with a tolerability profile similar to that of other SSRIs. The most common adverse events with paroxetine were nausea, sexual dysfunction, somnolence, asthenia, headache, constipation, dizziness, sweating, tremor and decreased appetite. In conclusion, paroxetine, in common with other SSRIs, is generally better tolerated than TCAs and is a first-line treatment option for major depressive disorder, dysthymia or minor depression. Like other SSRIs, paroxetine is also an appropriate first-line therapy for OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, GAD and PTSD. Notably, paroxetine is the only SSRI currently approved for the treatment of social anxiety disorder and GAD, which makes it the only drug of its class indicated for all five anxiety disorders in addition to major depressive disorder. Thus, given the high degree of psychiatric comorbidity of depression and anxiety, paroxetine is an important first-line option for the treatment of major depressive disorder, OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, GAD and PTSD.     

Spotlight on paroxetine in psychiatric disorders in adults

Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), with antidepressant and anxiolytic activity. In 6- to 24-week well designed trials, oral paroxetine 10 to 50 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo, at least as effective as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and as effective as other SSRIs and other antidepressants in the treatment of major depressive disorder. Relapse or recurrence over 1 year after the initial response was significantly lower with paroxetine 10 to 50 mg/day than with placebo and similar to that with imipramine 50 to 275 mg/day. The efficacy of paroxetine 10 to 40 mg/day was similar to that of TCAs and fluoxetine 20 to 60 mg/day in 6- to 12-week trials in patients aged > or = 60 years with major depression. Paroxetine 10 to 40 mg/day improved depressive symptoms to an extent similar to that of TCAs in patients with comorbid illness, and was more effective than placebo in the treatment of dysthymia and minor depression. Paroxetine 20 to 60 mg/day was more effective than placebo after 8 to 12 weeks' treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), panic disorder, social anxiety disorder (social phobia), generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Improvement was maintained or relapse was prevented for 24 weeks to 1 year in patients with OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder or GAD. The efficacy of paroxetine was similar to that of other SSRIs in patients with OCD and panic disorder and similar to that of imipramine but greater than that of 2'chlordesmethyldiazepam in patients with GAD. Paroxetine is generally well tolerated in adults, elderly individuals and patients with comorbid illness, with a tolerability profile similar to that of other SSRIs. The most common adverse events with paroxetine were nausea, sexual dysfunction, somnolence, asthenia, headache, constipation, dizziness, sweating, tremor and decreased appetite. In conclusion, paroxetine, in common with other SSRIs, is generally better tolerated than TCAs and is a first-line treatment option for major depressive disorder, dysthymia or minor depression. Like other SSRIs, paroxetine is also an appropriate first-line therapy for OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, GAD and PTSD. Notably, paroxetine is the only SSRI currently approved for the treatment of social anxiety disorder and GAD, which makes it the only drug of its class indicated for all five anxiety disorders in addition to major depressive disorder. Thus, given the high degree of psychiatric comorbidity of depression and anxiety, paroxetine is an important first-line option for the treatment of major depressive disorder, OCD, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, GAD and PTSD.     

Clomipramine. An overview of its pharmacological properties and a review of its therapeutic use in obsessive compulsive disorder and panic disorder

During the 20 years that have elapsed since clomipramine (chlorimipramine) was first marketed, it has become well established in the treatment of depressive illness, particularly treatment-resistant depression. However, in addition to its role as an antidepressant, attention is being focused on the use of clomipramine in 2 other areas of psychiatry: obsessive compulsive disorder and panic disorder. Short term clinical trials have shown that clomipramine is generally more effective than amitriptyline, imipramine, desipramine, nortriptyline or clorgiline in reducing obsessive compulsive symptoms. Clomipramine appears to produce some short term benefit with exposure therapy in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder. However, the efficacy of the drug after long term follow-up has not been fully investigated. The antiobsessional efficacy of clomipramine appears to be independent of its antidepressant activity. In patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (DSM-IIIR), clomipramine reduces the frequency and severity of panic attacks within 7 to 21 days of beginning treatment and efficacy is maintained for at least 12 months. Clomipramine is more effective than imipramine, the generally accepted standard treatment for patients with panic disorder after 2 weeks' treatment, but after 6 or 10 weeks both drugs are similarly effective. Other double-blind studies have shown that clomipramine is more effective than placebo and at least as effective as fluvoxamine and oxitriptan (5-hydroxytryptophan) in reducing panic attacks and associated anxiety. Adverse effects associated with clomipramine treatment are mild to moderate in nature and are predominantly a result of the drug's anticholinergic activity. The incidence of seizures is dose related, occurring in 0.48% of all patients receiving clomipramine less than or equal to 250 mg/day and 2.1% of patients receiving greater than or equal to 300 mg/day. In conclusion, the available data indicate that clomipramine is a worthwhile addition to the limited treatments available for obsessive compulsive disorder and panic disorder, two psychiatric disorders which have previously been difficult to manage pharmacologically.     

Escitalopram (S-enantiomer of citalopram): clinical efficacy and onset of action predicted from a rat model

Escitalopram is the active S-enantiomer of citalopram. In a chronic mild stress model of depression in rats, treatments with both escitalopram and citalopram were effective; however, a faster time to onset of efficacy compared to vehicle treatment was observed for escitalopram-treated (5 mg/kg/day) than for citalopram-treated (10 mg/kg/day) rats at Week 1. To study the predictability of this observation in the clinic, we analysed 4-week data from an 8-week, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose study that compared escitalopram and citalopram to placebo in primary care patients with major depressive disorder (baseline Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores > or =22 and < or =40). Since the flexible dosing started after Week 4, analysis of 4-week data ensured that the patients received fixed doses of 10 mg/day escitalopram (155 patients), 20 mg/day citalopram (160 patients), or placebo (154 patients). The efficacy analysis showed a significantly superior therapeutic effect for escitalopram versus placebo from Week 1 onwards (observed cases) with an adjusted mean change in MADRS at Week 4 (last observation carried forward) of 2.7 points (P=0.002). By comparison, 20 mg/day citalopram did not demonstrate a statistically significant effect compared to placebo. Escitalopram was well tolerated with an adverse event profile similar to that of citalopram. The preclinical observation that escitalopram possesses a faster time to onset of efficacy than citalopram was also seen in primary care patients with major depressive disorder. Thus, escitalopram is efficacious in depression and the effect occurs earlier than for citalopram.     

Long-term treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder after an acute response: a comparison of fluoxetine versus placebo

Few controlled studies have evaluated the long-term continuation of pharmacotherapy for relapse prevention in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This study assessed efficacy and safety of fluoxetine versus placebo in preventing relapse of OCD during a 52-week period in responders to short-term administration of fluoxetine. Patients who met DSM-IV criteria for OCD and had a Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale score > or = 19 were treated with single-blind fluoxetine 20, 40, or 60 mg/day (based on physician assessment of response and tolerability). After 20 weeks, responders were randomly assigned to receive continued treatment with fluoxetine or placebo and were monitored for relapse for up to 52 weeks. Of 130 patients who entered the study, 71 (55%) were randomly assigned to receive fluoxetine (N = 36) or placebo (N = 35). Patients who received fluoxetine had numerically lower relapse rates compared with those who received placebo, although the difference was not significant (Kaplan-Meier 1-year relapse rates: fluoxetine, 20.6%; placebo, 31.9%; one-tailed p value = 0.137). In additional analyses evaluating patients on the basis of fluoxetine dose at randomization, patients who continued treatment with fluoxetine 60 mg/day (N = 52) had significantly lower rates of relapse than those who were switched to placebo (Kaplan-Meier 1-year relapse rates: fluoxetine, 17.5%; placebo, 38.0%; one-tailed p value = 0.041). Those who responded to the acute treatment phase with 40 (N = 18) or 20 (N = 1) mg/day had low overall rates of relapse, and the difference between continued fluoxetine and placebo treatment for these patients was not significant. For responders to the 60 mg/day dosage, those patients who continued treatment with fluoxetine were provided greater protection against relapse than those patients switched to placebo.     

Fluoxetine in the prevention of depressive recurrences: a double-blind study

Optimal outcomes from depression treatment are long-term recovery and, in the case of recurrent depression, prevention of new episodes. However, few data are available concerning the long-term efficacy of antidepressants in prophylactic treatment to prevent recurrences of depression. The efficacy and safety of fluoxetine 20 mg/day was evaluated in reducing the number of depressive episodes and in extending the time free of symptoms in patients with recurrent unipolar major depression. Patients with recurrent unipolar major depression according to DSM-III-R criteria and who responded to 32 weeks of open-label fluoxetine were randomly assigned to receive fluoxetine 20 mg/day (N = 70) or placebo (N = 70) for 48 weeks of double-blind maintenance treatment. Outcome measures were the percentage of recurrences and time to recurrence. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events, reasons for discontinuation, vital signs, and laboratory measures. Fluoxetine was associated with a statistically significantly smaller percentage of patients who had a recurrence compared with placebo (20% vs. 40%; chi2 analysis, p = 0.010). The symptom-free period was significantly longer for patients treated with fluoxetine versus placebo (295 vs. 192 days; Kaplan-Meier estimates, log-rank test, p = 0.002). Treatments were well tolerated during maintenance treatment. The only statistically significant difference in adverse events between treatment groups was anxiety, which was more frequent in the placebo group (fluoxetine, 12.9% vs. placebo, 30%; chi2 analysis, p = 0.013). Two placebo-treated patients and no fluoxetine-treated patients were withdrawn because of adverse events. In conclusion, fluoxetine at 20 mg/day was effective and well tolerated for the prophylactic treatment of recurrent unipolar major depression.     

The complex relationship between pregnancy andbreast cancer

This article reviews escitalopram, the S-stereoisomer of the racemic compound citalopram, and a highly selective and potent member of the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor class of antidepressants. Escitalopram has a straightforward pharmacokinetic profile, little effect on hepatic metabolism, and is relatively safe in overdose. Similar to other members of the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor class, escitalopram (10 – 20 mg/day) is a well-tolerated and effective treatment of major depressive disorder. Although relatively few head-to-head comparative studies with other antidepressants have been published, pooled analyses of studies using citalopram as the active comparator suggest a modest advantage for the stereoisomer. This advantage, which is more apparent among patients with greater symptom levels, may be attributable to a greater than predicted potency compared with citalopram, presumably as a result of the greater effect of escitalopram at the allosteric binding site of the serotonin transporter. Results of two published studies versus venlafaxine also suggest better tolerability in the context of comparable efficacy. Escitalopram is also approved for the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder (in the US) and social anxiety disorder and panic disorder (in the EU). Pharmacoeconomic models suggest that the greater drug acquisition cost of this patent-protected compound may be offset by greater efficacy (relative to generic citalopram) and tolerability (compared with extended release venlafaxine).     

Impact of short‐term low‐dose atorvastatin on low‐density lipoprotein and high‐density lipoprotein subfraction phenotype

Statins can significantly reduce low‐density lipoprotein–cholesterol (LDL‐C) and modestly raise or not alter high‐density lipoprotein–cholesterol (HDL‐C). However, their impact on high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) and low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions has been less examined. The aim of the present study was to investigate the short‐term impact of low‐dose atorvastatin on HDL and LDL subfractions in humans. In this randomized study, data from 52 subjects were analysed. Thirty‐seven patients with atherosclerosis were randomized to treatment with atorvastatin 10 mg/day (n = 17) or 20 mg/day (n = 20) for 8 weeks, with 15 healthy subjects without therapy used as a control group. The lipid profile and lipoprotein subfractions were determined using the Lipoprint system at baseline and at 8 weeks. The data suggest that atorvastatin treatment (10 and 20 mg/day) for 8 weeks significantly decreases LDL‐C levels and reduces the cholesterol concentration of all LDL subfractions, which is accompanied by an increase of the mean LDL particle size. Although 10 mg/day atorvastatin treatment for 8 weeks had no impact on the HDL subfraction, 20 mg/day atorvastatin for 8 weeks significantly increased the cholesterol concentration of large HDL particles and decreased the cholesterol concentration of small HDL particles without changing serum HDL‐C levels in patients with atherosclerosis. Therefore, the results suggest that 20 mg/day atorvastatin treatment for 8 weeks may result in a favourable modification of the HDL subfraction phenotype in addition to its effects on the cholesterol concentration of all LDL subfractions and mean LDL particle size.     

Reboxetine and citalopram in panic disorder: a single-blind,cross-over,flexible-dose pilot study

Both noradrenergic and serotonergic systems have been implicated in the pathophysiology of panic disorder. The advent of selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (e.g. citalopram) and, more recently, selective noradrenergic (NA) reuptake inhibitors (NRIs) (e.g. reboxetine) has provided potentially important avenues of treatment for the disorder. To date, the comparative efficacy of selective NA and 5-HT reuptake inhibitors for panic disorder remains unresolved. Nineteen patients with panic disorder were randomized in a single-blind, cross-over design to either citalopram or reboxetine for 8 weeks and after a 2-week washout were switched to the other study drug. At week 18, seven of 13 patients (54%) in the intent-to-treat sample responded to reboxetine and nine of 11 patients responded to citalopram (82%). Both citalopram and reboxetine led to significant improvements in panic attack severity with no apparent between-drug differences in efficacy. However, citalopram demonstrated superior efficacy in treating depressive symptoms. One non-responder to citalopram responded to reboxetine and three non-responders to reboxetine responded to citalopram. Although SSRIs are viewed as a first-line treatment for panic disorder, these results suggest that a NA agent such as reboxetine may also have a role. These data also suggest an advantage for citalopram in treating comorbid depressive symptoms, although some patients may respond preferentially to an SSRI and other patients to an NRI.     

Escitalopram

Escitalopram oxalate (S-citalopram, Lexapro), a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor antidepressant which is the S-enantiomer of citalopram, is in clinical development worldwide for the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders. Preclinical studies demonstrate that the therapeutic activity of citalopram resides in the S-isomer and that escitalopram binds with high affinity to the human serotonin transporter. Conversely, R-citalopram is approximately 30-fold less potent than escitalopram at this transporter. Escitalopram has linear pharmacokinetics, so that plasma levels increase proportionately and predictably with increased doses and its half-life of 27 - 32 h is consistent with once-daily dosing. In addition, escitalopram has negligible effects on cytochrome P450 drug-metabolising enzymes in vitro, suggesting a low potential for drug-drug interactions. The efficacy of escitalopram in patients with major depressive disorder has been demonstrated in multiple short-term, placebo-controlled clinical trials, three of which included citalopram as an active control, as well as in a 36-week study evaluating efficacy in the prevention of depression relapse. In these studies, escitalopram was shown to have robust efficacy in the treatment of depression and associated symptoms of anxiety relative to placebo. Efficacy has also been shown in treating generalised anxiety disorder, panic disorder and social anxiety disorder. Results also suggest that, at comparable doses, escitalopram demonstrates clinically relevant and statistically significant superiority to placebo treatment earlier than citalopram. Analysis of the safety database shows a low rate of discontinuation due to adverse events, and there was no statistically significant difference between escitalopram 10 mg/day and placebo in the proportion of patients who discontinued treatment early because of adverse events. The most common adverse events associated with escitalopram which occurred at a rate greater than placebo include nausea, insomnia, ejaculation disorder, diarrhoea, dry mouth and somnolence. Only nausea occurred in > 10% of escitalopram-treated patients.     

Fluvoxamine. An updated review of its use in the management of adults with anxiety disorders

Fluvoxamine is a potent and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) that has little or no effect on other monoamine reuptake mechanisms. Relative to other SSRIs, fluvoxamine is a weak inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6, a moderate inhibitor of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 and a potent inhibitor of CYP1A2. In randomised, double-blind trials. fluvoxamine 100 to 300 mg/day for 6 to 10 weeks significantly reduced symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) compared with placebo. Response rates of 38 to 52% have been reported with fluvoxamine, compared with response rates of 0 to 18% with placebo. In patients with OCD, fluvoxamine had similar efficacy to that of clomipramine and, in smaller trials, the SSRIs paroxetine and citalopram and was significantly more effective than desipramine. Maintenance therapy with fluvoxamine may reduce the likelihood of relapses in up to 67% of patients with OCD. Fluvoxamine < or = 300 mg/day for 6 to 8 weeks was as effective as imipramine in patients with panic disorder, and significantly more effective than placebo. In addition, treatment with fluvoxamine < or = 300 mg/day for > or = 8 weeks improved symptoms of social phobia (social anxiety disorder), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), pathological gambling, compulsive buying, trichotillomania, kleptomania, body dysmorphic disorder, eating disorders and autistic disorder. Large trials comparing the efficacy of fluvoxamine and other SSRIs in patients with anxiety disorders are warranted. Fluvoxamine is generally well tolerated; in postmarketing studies, nausea was the only adverse event occurring in >10% of patients with less commonly reported events including somnolence, asthenia, headache, dry mouth and insomnia. Fluvoxamine is associated with a low risk of suicidal behaviour, sexual dysfunction and withdrawal syndrome. Fewer anticholinergic or cardiovascular events are associated with fluvoxamine than tricyclic antidepressants. Although comparative data are lacking, the tolerability profile of fluvoxamine appears to be broadly similar to those of other SSRIs. CONCLUSION: Fluvoxamine has demonstrated short term efficacy in the treatment of OCD, panic disorder, social phobia, PTSD and in a range of obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders. The drug is as effective as clomipramine in patients with OCD but appears to have a better tolerability profile. On the basis of current treatment guidelines, fluvoxamine, like other SSRIs, is recommended as first-line treatment for a number of anxiety disorders. It appears to offer some pharmacokinetic advantages and a different drug interaction profile to the other SSRIs with a broadly similar spectrum of adverse events. However, direct comparisons are required to assess the relative efficacy and tolerability of the different agents of this drug class.     

Managing depressive and anxiety disorders with escitalopram

This article reviews escitalopram, the S-stereoisomer of the racemic compound citalopram, and a highly selective and potent member of the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor class of antidepressants. Escitalopram has a straightforward pharmacokinetic profile, little effect on hepatic metabolism, and is relatively safe in overdose. Similar to other members of the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor class, escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) is a well-tolerated and effective treatment of major depressive disorder. Although relatively few head-to-head comparative studies with other antidepressants have been published, pooled analyses of studies using citalopram as the active comparator suggest a modest advantage for the stereoisomer. This advantage, which is more apparent among patients with greater symptom levels, may be attributable to a greater than predicted potency compared with citalopram, presumably as a result of the greater effect of escitalopram at the allosteric binding site of the serotonin transporter. Results of two published studies versus venlafaxine also suggest better tolerability in the context of comparable efficacy. Escitalopram is also approved for the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder (in the US) and social anxiety disorder and panic disorder (in the EU). Pharmacoeconomic models suggest that the greater drug acquisition cost of this patent-protected compound may be offset by greater efficacy (relative to generic citalopram) and tolerability (compared with extended release venlafaxine).     

Escitalopram

Escitalopram oxalate (S-citalopram, Lexapro^?), a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor antidepressant which is the S-enantiomer of citalopram, is in clinical development worldwide for the treatment of depression and anxiety disorders. Preclinical studies demonstrate that the therapeutic activity of citalopram resides in the S-isomer and that escitalopram binds with high affinity to the human serotonin transporter. Conversely, R-citalopram is ～ 30-fold less potent than escitalopram at this transporter. Escitalopram has linear pharmacokinetics, so that plasma levels increase proportionately and predictably with increased doses and its half-life of 27 – 32 h is consistent with once-daily dosing. In addition, escitalopram has negligible effects on cytochrome P450 drug-metabolising enzymes in vitro, suggesting a low potential for drug–drug interactions. The efficacy of escitalopram in patients with major depressive disorder has been demonstrated in multiple short-term, placebo-controlled clinical trials, three of which included citalopram as an active control, as well as in a 36-week study evaluating efficacy in the prevention of depression relapse. In these studies, escitalopram was shown to have robust efficacy in the treatment of depression and associated symptoms of anxiety relative to placebo. Efficacy has also been shown in treating generalised anxiety disorder, panic disorder and social anxiety disorder. Results also suggest that, at comparable doses, escitalopram demonstrates clinically relevant and statistically significant superiority to placebo treatment earlier than citalopram. Analysis of the safety database shows a low rate of discontinuation due to adverse events, and there was no statistically significant difference between escitalopram 10 mg/day and placebo in the proportion of patients who discontinued treatment early because of adverse events. The most common adverse events associated with escitalopram which occurred at a rate greater than placebo include nausea, insomnia, ejaculation disorder, diarrhoea, dry mouth and somnolence. Only nausea occurred in > 10% of escitalopram-treated patients.     

Review of fluoxetine and its clinical applications in premenstrual dysphoric disorder

The largest number of antidepressant treatment trials in premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) have been conducted with fluoxetine. Fluoxetine and other selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) clearly reduce premenstrual emotional and physical symptoms and improve premenstrual psychosocial functioning. Fluoxetine was the first SSRI to be approved by the FDA as a treatment for the emotional and physical symptoms of PMDD. Fluoxetine 20 mg has been reported to be effective for emotional and physical premenstrual symptoms with continuous daily dosing (every day of the menstrual cycle) and with luteal phase daily dosing (from ovulation to menses). In addition, premenstrual emotional symptoms have been reported to improve with fluoxetine 10 mg in luteal phase daily dosing and with 90 mg 2 and 1 weeks prior to menses. Fluoxetine is generally a well-tolerated treatment for PMDD and discontinuation effects have not been reported with intermittent dosing regimens.