Genomic characterization of small cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix

Small cell carcinoma (SCC) of the uterine cervix is a rare and aggressive form of neuroendocrine carcinoma, which resembles small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in its histology and poor survival rate. Here, we sought to define the genetic underpinning of SCCs of the uterine cervix and compare their mutational profiles with those of human papillomavirus (HPV)‐positive head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, HPV‐positive cervical carcinomas, and SCLCs using publicly available data. Using a combination of whole‐exome and targeted massively parallel sequencing, we found that the nine uterine cervix SCCs, which were HPV18‐positive (n = 8) or HPV16‐positive (n = 1), harbored a low mutation burden, few copy number alterations, and other than TP53 in two cases no recurrently mutated genes. The majority of mutations were likely passenger missense mutations, and only few affected previously described cancer‐related genes. Using RNA‐sequencing, we identified putative viral integration sites on 18q12.3 and on 8p22 in two SCCs of the uterine cervix. The overall nonsilent mutation rate of uterine cervix SCCs was significantly lower than that of SCLCs, HPV‐driven cervical adeno‐ and squamous cell carcinomas, or HPV‐positive head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Unlike SCLCs, which are reported to harbor almost universal TP53 and RB1 mutations and a dominant tobacco smoke‐related signature 4, uterine cervix SCCs rarely harbored mutations affecting these genes (2/9, 22% TP53; 0% RB1) and displayed a dominant aging (67%) or APOBEC mutational signature (17%), akin to HPV‐driven cancers, including cervical adeno‐ and squamous cell carcinomas and head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Taken together, in contrast to SCLCs, which are characterized by highly recurrent TP53 and RB1 alterations, uterine cervix SCCs were positive for HPV leading to inactivation of the suppressors p53 and RB, suggesting that these SCCs are convergent phenotypes.     

Pre‐ and post‐treatment blood‐based genomic landscape of patients with ROS1 or NTRK fusion‐positive solid tumours treated with entrectinib

Genomic tumour profiling informs targeted treatment options. Entrectinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with efficacy in NTRK fusion‐positive (‐fp) solid tumours and ROS1‐fp non‐small cell lung cancer. FoundationOne® Liquid CDx (F1L CDx), a non‐invasive in  vitro next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐based diagnostic, detects genomic alterations in plasma circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). We evaluated the clinical validity of F1L CDx as an aid in identifying patients with NTRK‐fp or ROS1‐fp tumours and assessed the genomic landscape pre‐ and post‐entrectinib treatment. Among evaluable pre‐treatment clinical samples (N = 85), positive percentage agreements between F1L CDx and clinical trial assays (CTAs) were 47.4% (NTRK fusions) and 64.5% (ROS1 fusions); positive predictive value was 100% for both. The objective response rate for CTA⁺ F1L CDx⁺ patients was 72.2% in both cohorts. The median duration of response significantly differed between F1L CDx⁺ and F1L CDx⁻ samples in ROS1‐fp (5.6 vs. 17.3 months) but not NTRK‐fp (9.2 vs. 12.9 months) patients. Fifteen acquired resistance mutations were detected. We conclude that F1L CDx is a clinically valid complement to tissue‐based testing to identify patients who may benefit from entrectinib and those with acquired resistance mutations associated with disease progression.     

Assessment of tumor burden and response to therapy in patients with colorectal cancer using a quantitative ctDNA test for methylated BCAT1/IKZF1

Failure of colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment is due to residual disease, and its timely identification is critical for patient survival. Detecting CRC‐associated mutations in patient circulating cell‐free DNA is confounded by tumor mutation heterogeneity, requiring primary tumor sequencing to identify relevant mutations. In this study, we assessed BCAT1 and IKZF1 methylation levels to quantify circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and investigated whether this method can be used to assess tumor burden and efficacy of therapy. In 175 patients with CRC who were ctDNA‐positive pretreatment, ctDNA levels were higher with advancing stage (P < 0.05) and correlated with tumor diameter (r = 0.35, P < 0.001) and volume (r = 0.58, P < 0.01). After completion of treatment (median of 70 days [IQR 49‐109] after surgery, +/− radiotherapy, +/− chemotherapy), ctDNA levels were reduced in 98% (47/48) and were undetectable in 88% (42/48) of patients tested. For those with incomplete adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery, roughly half remained ctDNA‐positive (11/21, 52.4%). The presence of ctDNA after treatment was associated with disease progression (HR 9.7, 95%CI 2.5‐37.6) compared to no ctDNA. Assaying blood for ctDNA methylated in BCAT1/IKZF1 has the potential for identifying residual disease due to treatment failure, informing a potential need for therapy adjustment in advanced disease.     

A novel anti‐c‐Kit antibody–drug conjugate to treat wild‐type and activating‐mutant c‐Kit‐positive tumors

c‐Kit overexpression and activating mutations, which are reported in various cancers, including gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC), acute myeloid leukemia, acral melanoma, and systemic mastocytosis (SM), confer resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). To overcome TKI resistance, an anti‐c‐Kit antibody–drug conjugate was developed in this study to treat wild‐type and mutant c‐Kit‐positive cancers. NN2101, a fully human IgG1, was conjugated to DM1, a microtubule inhibitor, through N‐succinimidyl‐4‐(N‐maleimidomethyl) cyclohexane‐1‐carboxylate (SMCC) (to give NN2101‐DM1). The antitumor activity of NN2101‐DM1 was evaluated in vitro and in vivo using various cancer cell lines. NN2101‐DM1 exhibited potent growth‐inhibitory activities against c‐Kit‐positive cancer cell lines. In a mouse xenograft model, NN2101‐DM1 exhibited potent growth‐inhibitory activities against imatinib‐resistant GIST and SM cells. In addition, NN2101‐DM1 exhibited a significantly higher anti‐cancer effect than carboplatin/etoposide against SCLC cells where c‐Kit does not mediate cancer pathogenesis. Furthermore, the combination of NN2101‐DM1 with imatinib in imatinib‐sensitive GIST cells induced complete remission compared with treatment with NN2101‐DM1 or imatinib alone in mouse xenograft models. These results suggest that NN2101‐DM1 is a potential therapeutic agent for wild‐type and mutant c‐Kit‐positive cancers.     

Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy Versus Surgery Alone for Stage IIB–III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundRetrospective studies have shown that adjuvant treatment improves survival of patients with stage IIB–III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, but there is no evidence from prospective trials so far.Materials and MethodsPatients with pathological stage IIB–III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were randomly assigned to receive surgery alone (SA), postoperative radiotherapy (PORT), or postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (POCRT). PORT patients received 54 Gy in 27 fractions; the POCRT group received 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, plus concurrent chemotherapy with paclitaxel (135–150 mg/m²) and cisplatin or nedaplatin (50–75 mg/m²) every 28 days. The primary endpoint was disease‐free survival (DFS), and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 172 patients were enrolled (SA, n = 54; PORT, n = 54; POCRT, n = 64). The 3‐year DFS was significantly better in PORT/POCRT patients than in SA patients (53.8% vs. 36.7%; p = .020); the 3‐year OS was also better in PORT/POCRT patients (63.9% vs. 48.0%; p = .025). The 3‐year DFS for SA, PORT, and POCRT patients were 36.7%, 50.0%, 57.3%, respectively (p = .048). The 3‐year OS for SA, PORT, and POCRT patients were 48.0%, 60.8%, 66.5%, respectively (p = .048).ConclusionPORT/POCRT (especially POCRT) may significantly improve DFS and OS in stage IIB–III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Implications for PracticeThe results of this phase III study indicated that postoperative radiotherapy/postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (PORT/POCRT) could significantly improve disease‐free survival and overall survival in stage IIB–III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma compared with surgery alone with acceptable toxicities. In‐field and out‐of‐field recurrences were comparable between the POCRT and PORT groups, which demonstrates the rationality and safety of the radiation field used in this study. The postoperative regimens in this trial might be accepted as standard treatment options for pathological stage IIB–III esophageal cancer. Larger sample size prospective randomized trials to identify the value are warranted.     

Safety and Efficacy of Cetuximab-Based Salvage Chemotherapy After Checkpoint Inhibitors in Head and Neck Cancer

BackgroundThere are still few data on the activity and safety of cetuximab‐based salvage chemotherapy after immunotherapy (SCAI) in patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN).Materials and MethodsThis was a retrospective study of patients with SCCHN who received cetuximab‐based SCAI after programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1(PD[L]1) inhibitors. Overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) with SCAI and with last chemotherapy before immunotherapy (LCBI) by RECIST 1.1, percentage change from baseline in target lesions (PCTL), progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), treatment compliance, and toxicity were evaluated.ResultsBetween March 2016 and November 2019, 23 patients were identified. SCAI consisted of cetuximab‐based combinations (3‐weekly cisplatin‐5FU‐cetuximab [n = 2], weekly paclitaxel‐cetuximab [n = 17], weekly cisplatin‐cetuximab [n = 2], weekly carboplatin‐paclitaxel‐cetuximab [n = 2]). ORR was 56.5% (11 partial response, 2 complete response). DCR was 78.3%. Among 13 objective responders, median best PCTL was −53.5% (range, −30% to −100%). Median OS and PFS were 12 months and 6 months, respectively. In 10 patients receiving LCBI, ORR to LCBI was 40%, whereas ORR to SCAI achieved 60%. In LCBI‐treated patients, median PFS with LCBI was 8 months and median PFS and OS with SCAI were 7 months and 12 months, respectively. Reduced dose intensity of the chemotherapy and cetuximab components occurred in 82.6% and 52.2% of the patients. Grade 1 or 2 adverse events (AEs) occurred in all patients. Grade 3 or 4 AEs developed in 65%, being grade 3 in all of them except in one patient (grade 4 neutropenia). There were no treatment‐related deaths.ConclusionCetuximab‐based salvage chemotherapy after PD(L)1 inhibitors associated with high response rates and deep tumor reductions with a manageable safety profile. Subsequent lines of therapy may explain the long survival achieved in our series. These results invite to design studies to elucidate the best therapeutic sequence in patients with SCCHN in the immunotherapy era.Implications for PracticeCetuximab‐based salvage chemotherapy (SCAI) achieved high response rates in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN) after progression to PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors. Objective response rate was higher than and progression‐free survival was comparable to that of chemotherapy administered before immunotherapy (IO). In most patients, SCAI consisted of weekly, well‐tolerated regimens. These observations have implications for current practice because of the limited evidence to date in SCCHN and the scant therapeutic options in this disease and invite to elucidate which may be the best treatment sequence for patients with head and neck cancer in the IO era.     

Genomic and pathological heterogeneity in clinically diagnosed small cell lung cancer in never/light smokers identifies therapeutically targetable alterations

Small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC) occurs infrequently in never/former light smokers. We sought to study this rare clinical subset through next‐generation sequencing (NGS) and by characterizing a representative patient‐derived model. We performed targeted NGS, as well as comprehensive pathological evaluation, in 11 never/former light smokers with clinically diagnosed SCLC. We established a patient‐derived model from one such patient (DFCI168) harboring an NRAS ^Q61K mutation and characterized the sensitivity of this model to MEK and TORC1/2 inhibitors. Despite the clinical diagnosis of SCLC, the majority (8/11) of cases were either of nonpulmonary origin or of mixed histology and included atypical carcinoid (n = 1), mixed non‐small‐cell lung carcinoma and SCLC (n = 4), unspecified poorly differentiated carcinoma (n = 1), or small‐cell carcinoma from different origins (n = 2). RB1 and TP53 mutations were found in four and five cases, respectively. Predicted driver mutations were detected in EGFR (n = 2), NRAS (n = 1), KRAS (n = 1), BRCA1 (n = 1), and ATM (n = 1), and one case harbored a TMPRSS2‐ERG fusion. DFCI168 (NRAS ^Q61K) exhibited marked sensitivity to MEK inhibitors in vitro and in vivo. The combination of MEK and mTORC1/2 inhibitors synergized to prevent compensatory mTOR activation, resulting in prolonged growth inhibition in this model and in three other NRAS mutant lung cancer cell lines. SCLC in never/former light smokers is rare and is potentially a distinct disease entity comprised of oncogenic driver mutation‐harboring carcinomas morphologically and/or clinically mimicking SCLC. Comprehensive pathologic review integrated with genomic profiling is critical in refining the diagnosis and in identifying potential therapeutic options.     

Phase II Study of Panitumumab Monotherapy in Chemotherapy‐Naïve Frail or Elderly Patients with Unresectable RAS Wild‐Type Colorectal Cancer: OGSG 1602

Lessons Learned

• Panitumumab monotherapy showed favorable efficacy and feasibility in the treatment of frail or elderly patients with RAS wild‐type unresectable colorectal cancer.
• It is especially effective for left‐sided tumors; therefore, panitumumab as first‐line treatment could be an additional therapeutic option for frail elderly patients, particularly in those who are unsuitable for upfront oxaliplatin‐based or irinotecan‐based combination regimens.

BackgroundFirst‐line panitumumab monotherapy is expected to be well tolerated and improve survival in patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, its safety and efficacy in chemotherapy‐naïve frail or elderly patients with unresectable RAS wild‐type (WT) colorectal cancer (CRC) have not been studied. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of panitumumab as first‐line treatment.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter phase II study on patients aged ≥76 years or ≥65 years considered unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy. Panitumumab 6 mg/kg of intravenous infusion was administered every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities.ResultsThirty‐six patients (median age: 81 [range, 67–88] years) were enrolled between February 2017 and August 2018. Two patients were excluded from the analysis of efficacy: one from lack of image examination at baseline and the other from lack of a measurable lesion. Thirty‐three (91.6%) patients had a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1, whereas two (5.6%) patients and one (2.8%) patient had a PS of 2 and 3, respectively. Twenty‐eight patients (77.8%) had left‐sided CRC, whereas eight (22.2%) had right‐sided CRC. The RR was 50.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.4–67.6), including three patients (8.8%) who had complete responses. A total of 26.5% had stable diseases, resulting in a DCR of 76.5% (90% CI, 61.5–87.7). The RR of patients with left‐ and right‐sided tumors was 65.4% (95% CI, 44.3–82.8) and 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0–36.9), respectively. Major grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicities were rash (n = 6, 16.7%), hypomagnesemia (n = 4, 11.1%), fatigue (n = 3, 8.3%), paronychia (n = 2, 5.6%), and hyponatremia (n = 2, 5.6%). The only grade 3 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (n = 1, 2.8%).ConclusionPanitumumab monotherapy showed favorable efficacy and feasibility in frail or elderly patients with RAS WT unresectable CRC. Survival analysis including OS, PFS, and TTF is currently in progress.     

Mcl‐1 and Bcl‐xL levels predict responsiveness to dual MEK/Bcl‐2 inhibition in B‐cell malignancies

Most patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) initially respond to targeted therapies, but eventually relapse and develop resistance. Novel treatment strategies are therefore needed to improve patient outcomes. Here, we performed direct drug testing on primary CLL cells and identified synergy between eight different mitogen‐activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors and the B‐cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl‐2) antagonist venetoclax. Drug sensitivity was independent of immunoglobulin heavy‐chain gene variable region (IGVH) and tumor protein p53 (TP53) mutational status, and CLL cells from idelalisib‐resistant patients remained sensitive to the treatment. This suggests that combined MEK/Bcl‐2 inhibition may be an option for high‐risk CLL. To test whether sensitivity could be detected in other B‐cell malignancies, we performed drug testing on cell line models of CLL (n = 4), multiple myeloma (MM; n = 8), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; n = 7). Like CLL, MM cells were sensitive to the MEK inhibitor trametinib, and synergy was observed with venetoclax. In contrast, MCL cells were unresponsive to MEK inhibition. To investigate the underlying mechanisms of the disease‐specific drug sensitivities, we performed flow cytometry‐based high‐throughput profiling of 31 signaling proteins and regulators of apoptosis in the 19 cell lines. We found that high expression of the antiapoptotic proteins myeloid cell leukemia‐1 (Mcl‐1) or B‐cell lymphoma‐extra large (Bcl‐xL) predicted low sensitivity to trametinib + venetoclax. The low sensitivity could be overcome by combined treatment with an Mcl‐1 or Bcl‐xL inhibitor. Our findings suggest that MEK/Bcl‐2 inhibition has therapeutic potential in leukemia and myeloma, and demonstrate that protein expression levels can serve as predictive biomarkers for treatment sensitivities.     

Precision medicine‐based therapies in advanced colorectal cancer: The University of California San Diego Molecular Tumor Board experience

Treatment for advanced colorectal cancer is often limited by complex molecular profiles, which promote resistance to systemic agents and targeted monotherapies. Recent studies suggest that a personalized, combinatorial approach of matching drugs to tumor alterations may be more effective. We implemented a precision medicine strategy by forming a Molecular Tumor Board (MTB), a multidisciplinary team of clinicians, scientists, bioinformaticians and geneticists. The MTB integrated molecular profiling information and patient characteristics to develop N‐of‐One treatments for 51 patients with advanced colorectal cancer. All patients had metastatic disease and 63% had received ≥ 3 prior therapy lines. Overall, 34/51 patients (67%) were matched to ≥ 1 drug recommended by the MTB based on individual tumor characteristics, whereas 17/51 (33%) patients received unmatched therapies. Patients who received matched therapy demonstrated significantly longer progression‐free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21–0.81; P = 0.01) and a trend towards higher clinical benefit rates (41% vs. 18%, P = 0.058) (all multivariate) compared to patients receiving unmatched therapy. The MTB facilitated personalized matching of drugs to tumor characteristics, which was associated with improved progression‐free survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.     

A randomised phase 2b study comparing the efficacy and safety of belotecan vs. topotecan as monotherapy for sensitive-relapsed small-cell lung cancer

Background This study compared the efficacy/safety of the camptothecin analogues belotecan and topotecan for sensitive-relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).Methods One-hundred-and-sixty-four patients were randomised (1:1) to receive five consecutive daily intravenous infusions of topotecan (1.5 mg/m²) or belotecan (0.5 mg/m²), every 3 weeks, for six cycles. Main outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tolerability and toxicity. The study statistical plan was non-inferiority design with ORR as the endpoint.Results In the belotecan vs. topotecan groups, ORR (primary endpoint) was 33% vs. 21% (p = 0.09) and DCR was 85% vs. 70% (p = 0.030). PFS was not different between groups. Median OS was significantly longer with belotecan than with topotecan (13.2 vs. 8.2 months, HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.48–0.99), particularly in patients aged <65 years, with more advanced disease (i.e., extensive-stage disease, time to relapse: 3–6 months), or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1 or 2. More belotecan recipients completed all treatment cycles (53% vs. 35%; p = 0.022).Conclusions The efficacy/safety of belotecan warrants further evaluation in Phase 3 trials. Belotecan potentially offers an alternative to topotecan for sensitive-relapsed SCLC, particularly in patients aged <65 years, with more advanced disease, or poor performance.Subject terms: Small-cell lung cancer, Lung cancer     

In vivo genome‐editing screen identifies tumor suppressor genes that cooperate with Trp53 loss during mammary tumorigenesis

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease that comprises multiple histological and molecular subtypes. To gain insight into mutations that drive breast tumorigenesis, we describe a pipeline for the identification and validation of tumor suppressor genes. Based on an in vivo genome‐wide CRISPR/Cas9 screen in Trp53^+/– heterozygous mice, we identified tumor suppressor genes that included the scaffold protein Axin1, the protein kinase A regulatory subunit gene Prkar1a, as well as the proof‐of‐concept genes Pten, Nf1, and Trp53 itself. Ex vivo editing of primary mammary epithelial organoids was performed to further interrogate the roles of Axin1 and Prkar1a. Increased proliferation and profound changes in mammary organoid morphology were observed for Axin1/Trp53 and Prkar1a/Trp53 double mutants compared to Pten/Trp53 double mutants. Furthermore, direct in vivo genome editing via intraductal injection of lentiviruses engineered to express dual short‐guide RNAs revealed that mutagenesis of Trp53 and either Prkar1a, Axin1, or Pten markedly accelerated tumor development compared to Trp53‐only mutants. This proof‐of‐principle study highlights the application of in vivo CRISPR/Cas9 editing for uncovering cooperativity between defects in tumor suppressor genes that elicit mammary tumorigenesis.     

A small molecule targeting CHI3L1 inhibits lung metastasis by blocking IL‐13Rα2‐mediated JNK‐AP‐1 signals

Our previous big data analyses showed a high level of association between chitinase 3 like1 (CHI3L1) expression and lung tumor development. In the present study, we investigated whether a CHI3L1‐inhibiting chemical, 2‐({3‐[2‐(1‐cyclohexen‐1‐yl)ethyl]‐6,7‐dimethoxy‐4‐oxo‐3,4‐dihydro‐2‐quinazolinyl}sulfanyl)‐N‐(4‐ethylphenyl)butanamide (K284), could inhibit lung metastasis and studied its mechanism of action. We investigated the antitumor effect of K284 both in vitro and in vivo. K284 (0.5 mg·kg⁻¹ body weight) significantly inhibited lung metastasis in in vivo models after injection of murine melanoma cells (B16F10) or adenocarcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial cells (A549). K284 significantly and concentration‐dependently also inhibited cancer cell proliferation and migration in the A549 and H460 lung cancer cell lines. We found that the binding of K284 to the chitin‐binding domain (CBD) of CHI3L1 prevented the binding of CHI3L1 to its receptor, interleukin‐13 receptor subunit alpha‐2 (IL‐13Rα2), thereby suppressing the CHI3L1 signal. This blocking of the CHI3L1‐IL‐13Rα2 signal caused the inhibition of c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase (JNK)‐activator protein 1 (AP‐1) signals, resulting in the prevention of lung metastasis and cancer cell growth. Our data demonstrate that K284 may serve as a potential candidate anticancer compound targeting CHI3L1.     

E‐cadherin is a robust prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer and low expression is associated with sensitivity to inhibitors of topoisomerase,aurora, and HSP90 in preclinical models

Cell–cell and cell–matrix adhesion proteins that have been implicated in colorectal epithelial integrity and epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition could be robust prognostic and potential predictive biomarkers for standard and novel therapies. We analyzed in situ protein expression of E‐cadherin (ECAD), integrin β4 (ITGB4), zonula occludens 1 (ZO‐1), and cytokeratins in a single‐hospital series of Norwegian patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) stages I–IV (n = 922) using multiplex fluorescence‐based immunohistochemistry (mfIHC) on tissue microarrays. Pharmacoproteomic associations were explored in 35 CRC cell lines annotated with drug sensitivity data on > 400 approved and investigational drugs. ECAD, ITGB4, and ZO‐1 were positively associated with survival, while cytokeratins were negatively associated with survival. Only ECAD showed independent prognostic value in multivariable Cox models. Clinical and molecular associations for ECAD were technically validated on a different mfIHC platform, and the prognostic value was validated in another Norwegian series (n = 798). In preclinical models, low and high ECAD expression differentially associated with sensitivity to topoisomerase, aurora, and HSP90 inhibitors, and EGFR inhibitors. E‐cadherin protein expression is a robust prognostic biomarker with potential clinical utility in CRC.