Improved progenitor assay standardization using peripheral blood progenitor cells from a donor treated with granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor

BACKGROUND: Progenitor assays are the principal method for evaluating hematopoietic cell function. The magnitude of assay variability and the assay steps contributing to variability were determined, and modifications intended to increase assay consistency were evaluated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Assays were performed using a serum-free progenitor assay medium with cells plated at 5.0 x 10(4) and 1.0 x 10(5) cells per plate. A peripheral blood progenitor cell component collected from a normal donor after administration of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor was divided into identical aliquots. Each experiment involved at least 5 technologists, each performing assays in duplicate on five aliquots, with each person scoring all assay plates. Three sample preparation methods were tested: 1) ficoll mononuclear cell enrichment and sample dilution, 2) sample dilution without ficoll separation, and 3) sample dilution without ficoll separation, with cell counts performed before and after each dilution step, dilution volumes calculated on the basis of each cell count, automated electronic pipettors used in dilution steps, and colony frequency calculated on the basis of cell counts from the final specimen. RESULTS: Global variability for colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage, represented by the percentage of CV for all specimens and all technologists, was 89.6 percent at 5.0 x 10(4) cells per plate and 81.3 percent at 1.0 x 10(5), when ficoll separation was used. Subjective differences in scoring plates did not account for most of the variability observed, as results for any individual plate read by multiple technologists had a mean CV of 15.6 percent and 19.7 percent at the two plating concentrations. Method 3 resulted in the greatest improvement, reducing CV to 24.4 percent at 5.0 x 10(4) cells per plate and to 24.2 percent at 1.0 x 10(5) cells per plate. Similar results were obtained for erythroid-burst-forming units. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline assay results were extremely inconsistent. Interindividual differences in colony interpretation did not contribute significantly to assay variability, although sample preparation and plating did. Improved control over cell concentration decreased assay variability by 70 to 73 percent.     

High platelet contamination in progenitor cell concentrates results in significantly lower CD34+ yield after immunoselection

BACKGROUND: Selection of CD34+ cells by specific immunoselection leads to a significant loss of those cells. The factors influencing the yield and purity are not well identified. The results of CD34+ selection from peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) with high and low platelet contamination that are harvested with two different cell separators are reported. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A progenitor cell concentrator (Ceprate SC, CellPro) was used to select CD34+ cells from 41 PBPC concentrates from 23 consecutive patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 3), breast cancer (n = 17), and multiple myeloma (n = 3). PBPC collection was performed by using two cell separators (CS3000 Plus, Fenwal: Group A, n = 11; and Spectra, COBE: Group B, n = 9). To reduce platelet contamination in the Spectra PBPC concentrates, an additional low-speed centrifugation was performed before CD34+ cell selection (Group C, n = 3). Leukapheresis components were stored overnight at 4 degrees C and combined with the next day's collection before the CD34+ selection procedure in 19 patients. RESULTS: A median of 1.5 leukapheresis procedures per patient were performed. Pooled PBPC concentrates showed no statistical difference in median numbers of white cells and CD34+ cells in Groups A and B: 3.2 (0.8-9.2) versus 4.4 (1.6-8. 3) x 10(10) white cells per kg and 15.0 (4.7-24.0) versus 12.0 (5. 6-34.0) x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. Platelet contamination was significantly higher in Group B: 0.67 (0.15-2.4) versus 2.3 (0.5-7. 1) x 10(11) (p = 0.0273). After the selection process, there was a significantly greater loss of CD34+ cells in Group B than in Group A: 39.1 versus 63.2 percent (p = 0.0070), with a median purity of 78. 0 percent versus 81.0 percent. An additional low-speed centrifugation before CD34+ cell selection seemed to reduce CD34+ cell loss in Group C with 16.9, 31.9, and 37.5 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: CD34+ cell selection from PBPC concentrates resulted in an increased loss of CD34+ cells in concentrates with a higher platelet content. To improve CD34+ yield, PBPC concentrates with an initially low platelet contamination should be used, or additional low-speed centrifugation should be performed.     

The timing of granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor administration after chemotherapy does not affect stem and progenitor cell apheresis yield: a retrospective study of 65 cases

BACKGROUND: The optimal time for postchemotherapy granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration before peripheral blood stem and progenitor cell (PBPC) collection is not well defined. The impact of G-CSF scheduling on the number of CD34+ cells collected by leukapheresis from 65 patients with malignant disease was studied retrospectively. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Chemotherapy was performed on Days 1 and 2 and was followed by G-CSF to mobilize PBPCs. In Group 1, 30 patients received the first dose of G-CSF immediately after the end of chemotherapy, as commonly recommended. In Group 2, 35 patients received the first G-CSF dose after the end of chemotherapy (Days 7 or 8). RESULTS: No difference was observed between the two groups in white cell recovery and the median number of CD34+ cells harvested. The number of leukapheresis procedures necessary to obtain the minimal number of 3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg was the same. The proportion of patients with a failure of PBPC collection was similar, and G-CSF consumption was reduced in Group 2 without increasing infectious risks. CONCLUSION: Early administration of G-CSF after chemotherapy appears not to be a prerequisite for satisfactory PBPC collection. This approach could allow significant savings in terms of medical cost. A randomized and prospective study would be necessary, however, to assess the validity of these conclusions.     

Successful mobilization of peripheral blood HPCs with G-CSF alone in patients failing to achieve sufficient numbers of CD34+ cells and/or CFU-GM with chemotherapy and G-CSF

BACKGROUND: Mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF may result in poor peripheral blood HPC collection, yielding <2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg or <10 x 10(4) CFU-GM per kg in leukapheresis procedures. The best mobilization strategy for oncology patients remains unclear. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In 27 patients who met either the CD34 (n = 3) or CFU-GM (n = 2) criteria or both (n = 22), the results obtained with two successive strategies-that is, chemotherapy and G-CSF at 10 microg per kg (Group 1, n = 7) and G-CSF at 10 microg per kg alone (Group 2, n = 20) used for a second mobilization course-were retrospectively analyzed. The patients had non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (5), Hodgkin's disease (3), multiple myeloma (5), chronic myeloid leukemia (1), acute myeloid leukemia (1), breast cancer (6), or other solid tumors (6). Previous therapy consisted of 10 (1-31) cycles of chemotherapy with additional chlorambucil (n = 3), interferon (n = 3), and radiotherapy (n = 7). RESULTS: The second collection was undertaken a median of 35 days after the first one. In Group 1, the results of the two mobilizations were identical. In Group 2, the number of CD34+ cells per kg per apheresis (0.17 [0.02-0.45] vs. 0.44 [0.11-0.45], p = 0. 00002), as well as the number of CFU-GM (0.88 [0.00-13.37] vs. 4.19 [0.96-21.61], p = 0.00003), BFU-E (0.83 [0.00-12.72] vs. 8.81 [1. 38-32.51], p = 0.00001), and CFU-MIX (0.10 [0.00-1.70] vs. 0.56 [0. 00-2.64], p = 0.001134) were significantly higher in the second peripheral blood HPC collection. However, yields per apheresis during the second collection did not significantly differ in the two groups. Six patients in Group 1 and 18 in Group 2 underwent transplantation, and all but one achieved engraftment, with a median of 15 versus 12 days to 1,000 neutrophils (NS), 22 versus 16 days to 1 percent reticulocytes (NS), and 26 versus 26 days to 20,000 platelets (NS), respectively. However, platelet engraftment was particularly delayed in many patients. CONCLUSION: G-CSF at 10 microg per kg alone may constitute a valid alternative to chemotherapy and G-CSF to obtain adequate numbers of peripheral blood HPCs in patients who previously failed to achieve mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF. This strategy should be tested in prospective randomized trials.     

Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells with an automated leukapheresis system

BACKGROUND: Apheresis devices designed for the collection of mature blood elements are being used for the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs).The collection of PBPCs differs from that of other cells in the rarity of the target cell and in the fact that donors may undergo several days of collection. A consequence of this process may be a depletion of blood cells such as platelets from the blood. The disposable set and operating software for an apheresis device (Spectra, COBE BCT) was modified by the manufacturer to automate the collection of PBPCs and reduce the collection of unwanted blood cells. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A study was initiated to compare the collection of PBPCs with the new device, the AutoPBSC (version [V]6.0 with AutoPBSC tubing set), and that with the MNC (mononuclear cell) procedure (V4.7 with white cell tubing set), for patients and healthy donors. RESULTS: Patients whose blood was processed by either theV6.0 orV4.7 procedure achieved the target dose of 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of patient weight in similar numbers of procedures, even though the calculated collection efficiency for CD34+ cells using the automated V6.0 procedure was significantly less than that with the V4.7 procedure for both allogeneic donors and patients donating PBPCs. The collection efficiency for platelets was lower with the V6.0 procedure, and components collected in this manner contained fewer platelets. Apheresis by the V6.0 procedure required 30 to 60 more minutes per procedure than apheresis by the V4.7 procedure. Review of engraftment kinetics after transplantation did not reveal any effect of the collection procedure on recipients of either allogeneic or autologous transplants. CONCLUSION: The collection efficiencies of the V6.0 procedure for both CD34+ cells and mature blood cells are lower than those of the V4.7 procedure.The lower collection efficiency for platelets results in a smaller drop in peripheral blood platelet count after the procedure.The automated features of the V6.0 procedure may simplify PBPC collection, but this procedure requires a longer apheresis.     

Semi-automated flow cytometric analysis of CD34-expressing hematopoietic cells in peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products

BACKGROUND: The measurement of CD34+ cells is the most important step in the quality control of peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products. For this purpose, flow cytometry is applied. Recently, a new test kit has been introduced for the enumeration of CD34-expressing cells, in combination with software support for semi-automation of data acquisition and analysis. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study evaluated the ProCOUNT kit. Ninety samples obtained from peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products from 39 patients with hemato-oncologic diseases were analyzed. For data acquisition and analysis, ProCOUNT software was used. Data comparison was performed with parallel measurements according to the International Society for Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering (ISHAGE) guidelines and the German reference protocol for analysis of CD34-expressing cells. RESULTS: Correlation of the German and ISHAGE techniques was excellent (r2 = 0.99). The initial correlation coefficient of ProCOUNT analysis with the German protocol was r2 = 0.89. In 21 (23.3%) of 90 ProCOUNT analyses, a warning message was encountered from the ProCOUNT software. Following manual reevaluation of these data with CellQUEST software, a correlation of r2 = 0.96 with the German protocol and r2 = 0.97 with the ISHAGE analyses was obtained. ANOVA testing revealed significant differences between ProCOUNT and ISHAGE techniques (p<0.05) and between ProCOUNT and the German protocol (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference between ISHAGE and German protocol was observed (p = 0.19). CONCLUSION: The ProCOUNT kit and software for semi-automated data acquisition and analysis represents a further step toward standardization of CD34 cell quantitation in peripheral blood progenitor cell apheresis products. However, the occurrence of software warnings is high, and analysis or data reevaluation by experienced staff is still mandatory. Therefore, currently there is no definite advantage of the kit and software over the existing guidelines for CD34+ analysis in peripheral blood progenitor cell grafts.     

A cell-kinetic model of CD34+ cell mobilization and harvest: development of a predictive algorithm for CD34+ cell yield in PBPC collections

BACKGROUND: Mobilization and homing of PBPCs are still poorly understood. Thus, a sufficient algorithm for the prediction of PBPC yield in apheresis procedures does not yet exist. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The decline of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood during apheresis and their simultaneous increase in the collection bag were determined in a prospective study of 18 consecutive apheresis procedures. A cell-kinetic, four-compartment model describing these changes was developed. Retrospective data from 136 apheresis procedures served to further improve this model. A predictive algorithm for the yield was developed that considered the sex, weight, and height of the patient, the number of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood before apheresis, the inlet flow, and the duration of the apheresis. The accuracy of this algorithm was evaluated by comparison of the predicted and the observed yields of CD34+ cells in 105 prospective autologous and 148 retrospective allogeneic apheresis procedures. RESULTS: The correlation between predicted and observed yields was good for the autologous and allogeneic groups with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.8979 and 0.8311 (p<0.0001), respectively. The regression is described by the equations log (measured value [m]) = 1.0118 + 0.8595 x log (predicted value [p]) for the autologous and log (m) = 2.226 + 0.7559 x log (p) for the allogeneic group. The respective equations for the zero-point regression are log (m) = 1.014 x log (p) and log (m) = 1.026 x log (p). The probability that the measured value was 90 percent or more of the predicted value was 83.8 percent for the autologous and 90.5 percent for the allogeneic apheresis procedures. CONCLUSION: The predictive accuracy of the algorithm and the slope of the zero-point regression curve were higher for allogeneic than autologous PBPC collections. The predictive algorithm may be a useful tool in PBPC harvest, enabling the adaptation of the size of the apheresis to the needs of each patient.     

Allogeneic blood progenitor cell collection in normal donors after mobilization with filgrastim: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

BACKGROUND: Information on the safety and efficacy of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection in filgrastim-mobilized normal donors is still limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The PBPC donor database from a 42-month period (12/94-5/98) was reviewed for apheresis and clinical data related to PBPC donation. Normal PBPC donors received filgrastim (6 microg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours) for 3 to 4 days and subsequently underwent daily leukapheresis. The target collection was > or =4 x 10(6)CD34+ cells per kg of recipient's body weight. RESULTS: A total of 350 donors were found to be evaluable. Their median age was 41 years (range, 4-79). Their median preapheresis white cell count was 42.8 x 10(9) per L (range, 18.3-91.6). Of these donors, 17 (5%) had inadequate peripheral venous access. Leukapheresis could not be completed because of apheresis-related adverse events in 2 donors (0.5%). Of the 324 donors evaluable for apheresis yield data, 221 (68%) reached the collection target with one leukapheresis. The median CD34+ cell dose collected (first leukapheresis) was 462 x 10(6) (range, 29-1463).The main adverse events related to filgrastim administration in donors evaluable for toxicity (n = 341) were bone pain (84%), headache (54%), fatigue (31%), and nausea (13%). These events were rated as moderate to severe (grade 2-3) by 171 (50%) of the donors. In 2 donors (0.5%), they prompted the discontinuation of filgrastim administration. CONCLUSION: PBPC apheresis for allogeneic transplantation is safe and well tolerated. It allows the collection of an "acceptable" PBPC dose in most normal donors with one leukapheresis, with minimal need for invasive procedures.     

A new apheresis procedure for the preparation of high-quality red cells and plasma

BACKGROUND: Multicomponent apheresis is an alternative way of preparing blood components that avoids the delay between collection and separation seen with standard whole-blood techniques. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An apheresis device has been modified to facilitate the combined collection of a unit (250 mL) of red cells (RBCs) and a high-volume unit (475 mL) of plasma. The procedure, using 8-percent ACD-A, has been tested in two European blood centers. Each center performed 20 procedures for in vitro evaluation of collected RBCs and plasma and 10 procedures for evaluation of in vivo RBC recovery. All RBCs were white cell reduced by filtration. One-half of the RBC units were stored in the additive solution Adsol and one-half in another such solution (Erythro-Sol). RESULTS: The target volumes of RBCs and plasma were obtained in 27 minutes (range, 20-44 min) by using three to six cycles in a single-needle procedure. Saline (275 mL) was used to replace fluid volume withdrawn in excess of standard whole-blood donation. No side effects occurred, with the exception of minor signs of hypocalcemia. RBC ATP was well maintained (>65% at Day 42) during storage; 2,3-DPG was less well maintained, with virtually none remaining at Day 21 in either Adsol or Erythro-Sol. The RBC in vivo recoveries, after 42 days of storage at 4+/-2 degrees C determined by the single-label method, were 86.7+/-7.2 percent (Erythro-Sol) and 84.4+/-8.1 percent (Adsol). Mean plasma factor VIII levels were >100 percent in all test groups. CONCLUSION: A novel automated technique for the simultaneous collection and preparation of RBCs and plasma has been evaluated. The apheresis procedure was acceptable and well tolerated by donors, and it resulted in high-quality blood components. Further optimization of the system should yield a practicable component suitable for routine use in blood banks.     

Comparison of intermittent- and continuous-flow cell separators for the collection of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with hematologic malignancies

BACKGROUND: The transplantation of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) after high-dose chemotherapy is a valuable therapy for patients with hematologic and solid malignancies. Several methods are used for harvesting PBPCs. The efficiency of intermittent- and continuous-flow blood cell separators in collecting progenitor cells from the blood of patients undergoing myeloablative treatment for cancer was compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBPC components (n = 133) were obtained from 72 patients by leukapheresis with continuous-flow machines (Spectra, COBE; CS 3000 Plus, Baxter) and with an intermittent-flow machine (MCS 3P, Haemonetics). The data were analyzed retrospectively. Blood samples obtained from the patients before leukapheresis and samples of the leukapheresis components themselves were analyzed for their content of RBCs, WBCs, platelets, and CD34+ cells. RESULTS: The Spectra processed more than twice the blood volume in the shortest time (15 L in 178 min), whereas the Baxter CS 3000 Plus (10 L in 185 min) and the MCS 3P (4.8 L in 239 min) processed significantly smaller volumes in a longer time. The mean ACD consumption was 403 mL with the MCS 3P, 900 mL with the CS 3000 Plus, and 1000 mL with the Spectra. The product volumes were 50 mL (CS 3000 Plus), 69 mL (MCS 3P), and 166 mL (Spectra). In all groups, differences in the preapheresis hemograms were not significant, but the Spectra group had fewer CD34+ cells than the other groups. Despite this, the differences in the number of CD34+ cells in the leukapheresis components of all groups were without statistical significance. In the Spectra group, the collection of MNCs of 104 percent and CD34+ cells of 154 percent was significantly more efficient than that in the MCS 3P group (42.2% and 56%, respectively) or the CS 3000 Plus group (50.8% and 47.15%) as related to the patients' blood volume. CONCLUSION: PBPC collection can be performed successfully with continuous-flow and intermittent-flow blood cell separators. The Spectra had the best recovery of CD34+ cells within the shortest time. Leukapheresis with the MCS 3P is indicated if only a single venous access is available.     

Isolation of CD34+ progenitor cells from peripheral blood by use of an automated immunomagnetic selection system: factors affecting the results

BACKGROUND: The isolation of CD34+ cells from mobilized peripheral blood is being increasingly used in the setting of allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. Investigation of variables that may influence the effectiveness of CD34+ cell selection is of interest. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty-one CD34+ cell selections from peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) (39 allogeneic and 12 autologous) were performed using a magnetic cell separator (Isolex 300i, Baxter), including version 2.0 software. The results obtained were analyzed for different processing variables. The feasibility of transplanting these isolated CD34+ cells was also analyzed. RESULTS: The isolated CD34+ cell fraction had a median purity of 88.9 percent (range, 47.8-98.3). The median recovery of CD34+ cells was 45.1 percent (13.8-76.2), and the median colony-forming unit- granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) content was 17. 2 percent (0.8-58.6). Logarithms of T- and B-cell depletion had median values of 3.7 and 2.8, respectively. The version 2.0 software of the Isolex 300i gave a higher CD34+ cell recovery in the enriched cell fraction (median 57.8%) than did version 1.11 (39.4%) or 1.12 (44.4%) (p = 0.01). The use of recombinant human deoxyribonuclease I during cell processing yielded more CD34+ cells (53% vs. 41%, p = 0. 01) and higher purity (92.8% vs. 87%, p = 0.03). There was a correlation between the percentage of CD34+ cells labeled with the monoclonal antibody 8G12 clone and the percentage of CD34+ cells labeled with the monoclonal antibody used during the processing technique (9C5 clone) in the initial, enriched, and depleted CD34+ cell fractions (R(2) = 0.95; 0.92; 0.78, p< 0.005, respectively). Median times for recovering >0.5 x 10(9) per L of granulocytes and >20 x 10(9) per L of platelets were 13 and 16 days in the allograft patients and 13 and 14 days in the autograft patients. CONCLUSION: CD34+ cells can be highly and effectively isolated from allogeneic and autologous grafts by use of this automated technique, with a high grade of T- and B-cell depletion. These purified CD34+ cell components can engraft normally.     

Delayed massive immune hemolysis mediated by minor ABO incompatibility after allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow transplantation with minor ABO incompatibility may be followed by moderate delayed hemolysis of the recipient's red cells by donor-derived ABO antibodies. This reaction may be more severe after transplantation of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs). CASE REPORT: A 16-year-old boy underwent an allogeneic PBPC transplant from his HLA-mismatched mother as treatment for acute myeloblastic leukemia that had proved resistant to induction chemotherapy. Transfusion of the unmanipulated PBPCs proceeded without any complication, despite the difference in ABO blood group (donor, O Rh-positive; recipient, A Rh-positive). On Day 7, a rapid drop in hemoglobin to 4 g per dL was observed, which was attributed to a massive hemolysis. All the recipient's group A red cells were destroyed within 36 hours. This delayed and rapidly progressive hemolytic anemia was not associated with the transfusion of the donor's plasma. Rather, the anti-A titer increased in parallel with marrow recovery, which suggested an active synthesis of these antibodies by immunocompetent cells from the donor against the recipient's red cells. The mother's anti-A titer was retrospectively found to be 2048. Her unusually high titer is probably due to prior sensitization during pregnancies. On Day 12, the patient developed grade IV graft-versus-host disease, which proved resistant to all treatments instituted and led to his death on Day 35. CONCLUSION: PBPC transplantation with minor ABO incompatibility may be associated with significant risk of massive delayed hemolysis.     

The dose of granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor after chemopriming treatment does not influence apheresis yield of progenitor cells: a retrospective study of 91 cases

BACKGROUND: The optimal dose of post-chemotherapy granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor (G–CSF) administration before peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection has not been determined as yet, although 5 μg per kg per day has been recommended as the standard dose. This study retrospectively analyzed the effect of G–CSF dose on peripheral blood CD34+ cell collection from 91 patients with hematologic malignancies.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Various doses of G–CSF were administered after several chemotherapeutic PBPC mobilization regimens. According to the dose of G–CSF administered, patients were assigned to two groups. Group 1 included 46 patients who received a low dose of G–CSF (median, 3.6 [range, 2.8-4.6] μg/kg/day). Group 2 included 45 patients who received a standard G–CSF dose of 6.0 (5.5-8.1) μg per kg per day. Patients in the two groups were matched for age, diagnosis, previous therapy, and chemotherapeutic PBPC mobilization regimens.
RESULTS: No difference was observed in the median number of CD34+ cells harvested from each group. The number of leukapheresis procedures necessary to obtain a minimum of 3 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells per kg was the same in both groups, and the percentage of patients who failed to achieve adequate PBPC collections was similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The administration of low-dose G–CSF after chemotherapy appears equivalent to administration of the standard dose in achieving satisfactory PBPC collection. This approach could allow significant savings in medical cost. A randomized and prospective study is necessary, however, to assess the validity of these conclusions.     

Inverse relationship between patient peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts and collection efficiency for CD34+ cells in two automated leukapheresis systems

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the CD34 cell collection efficiency (CE) of automated leukapheresis protocols of two blood cell separators (Spectra, COBE [AutoPBSC protocol] and AS104, Fresenius [PBSC-Lym, protocol]) for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) harvest in patients with malignant diseases. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBPCs were collected by the Spectra AutoPBSC protocol in 95 patients (123 collections) and the AS104 PBSC-Lym protocol in 87 patients (115 harvests). Patients underwent a median of one (range, 1-4) conventional-volume apheresis procedure of 10.8 L (9.0-13.9) to obtain a target cell dose of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. RESULTS: The median overall CD34 CE was significantly better on the AS104 than on the Spectra: 55.8 percent versus 42.4 percent (p = 0.000). This was also true below (59.2% vs. 50.1%; p = 0.022) and above (51.2% vs. 41.3%; p = 0.001) the preleukapheresis threshold of 40 CD34+ cells per microL needed to collect a single-apheresis autograft. However, at > or =40 circulating CD34+ cells per microL, both cell separators achieved the target of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. The CD34 CE dropped significantly, from 59.2 percent at <40 cells per microL to 51.2 percent at > or =40 cells per microL on the AS104 (p = 0.017) and from 50.1 percent to 41.3 percent on the Spectra (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Whereas the CD34 CE was significantly different with the AS104 and the Spectra, the CD34 CE of both machines correlated inversely with peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts, showing a significant decline with increasing numbers of circulating CD34+ cells. Nevertheless, at > or 40 preapheresis CD34+ cells per microL, sufficient hematopoietic autografts of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg were harvested by a single conventional-volume (11 L) leukapheresis on both cell separators.     

The dose of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor after chemopriming treatment does not influence apheresis yield of progenitor cells: a retrospective study of 91 cases

BACKGROUND: The optimal dose of post-chemotherapy granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration before peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection has not been determined as yet, although 5 microg per kg per day has been recommended as the standard dose. This study retrospectively analyzed the effect of G-CSF dose on peripheral blood CD34+ cell collection from 91 patients with hematologic malignancies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Various doses of G-CSF were administered after several chemotherapeutic PBPC mobilization regimens. According to the dose of G-CSF administered, patients were assigned to two groups. Group 1 included 46 patients who received a low dose of G-CSF (median, 3.6 [range, 2.8-4.6] microg/kg/day). Group 2 included 45 patients who received a standard G-CSF dose of 6.0 (5.5-8. 1) microg per kg per day. Patients in the two groups were matched for age, diagnosis, previous therapy, and chemotherapeutic PBPC mobilization regimens. RESULTS: No difference was observed in the median number of CD34+ cells harvested from each group.The number of leukapheresis procedures necessary to obtain a minimum of 3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg was the same in both groups, and the percentage of patients who failed to achieve adequate PBPC collections was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The administration of low-dose G-CSF after chemotherapy appears equivalent to administration of the standard dose in achieving satisfactory PBPC collection.This approach could allow significant savings in medical cost. A randomized and prospective study is necessary, however, to assess the validity of these conclusions.     

Immunomagnetic selection of CD34+ cells: factors influencing component purity and yield

BACKGROUND: In immunomagnetic selection of CD34+ cells from HPC transplants, not all factors that affect yield and purity of CD34+ cells are known. METHODS: Forty-three consecutive procedures of immunomagnetic selection of CD34+ cells from peripheral blood HPCs and bone marrow harvests (autologous harvests, n = 27; allogeneic harvests; n=16) were performed by use of a cell selection system (Isolex 300i, Baxter Immunotherapy). The composition of the starting component and the subsets of CD34+ cells were analyzed for correlation with the yield and purity of the final component. RESULTS: The mean purity of the final components was 84.3 percent (range, 27-99%), and the mean yield was 51.4 percent (range, 9.4-80. 4%). Partial regression analysis showed that, among the factors correlating with purity and/or yield, the RBC volume in the starting fraction had the highest predictive impact on the purity and yield of CD34+ cells, even after the exclusion of procedures using bone marrow harvests as an HPC source (beta coefficient, -0.704; p = 0. 001). CONCLUSION: The use of the Isolex 300i system allows efficient recovery of CD34+ cells in routine selection procedures. The volume of RBCs in the starting component should be minimized to ensure a high yield and purity of the final component.     

Immune reconstitution after autologous selected peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: comparison of two CD34+ cell-selection systems

BACKGROUND: Selection of CD34+ PBPCs has been applied as a method of reducing graft contamination from neoplastic cells. This procedure seems to delay lymphocyte recovery, while myeloid engraftment is no different from that with unselected PBPC transplants. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Lymphocyte recovery was studied in two groups of patients who underwent autologous CD34+ PBPC transplant with two different technologies (Ceprate SC, Cellpro [n = 17]; CliniMACS, Miltenyi Biotech [n = 13]). The median number of CD34+ cells transfused was 3.88 x 10(6) per kg and 3.32 x 10(6) per kg, respectively. Residual CD3 cells x 10(6) per kg were 4.97 and 0.58, respectively (p = 0.041). Residual CD19 cells x 10(6) per kg were 1.33 and 0.73, respectively (NS). RESULTS: No differences were found between the two groups in total lymphocyte recovery to >0.5 x 10(9) per L, which achieved a stable count by Day 30. During the study period, the CD4+ cell count remained below 0.2 x 10(9) per L, and the B-cell subset showed a trend toward normalization. CD3/HLA-DR+ and CD16/56 increased markedly in both groups by Day 30. An increase in CMV (13%) and adenovirus (17.4%) infection was found in both groups. CONCLUSION: Both CD34+ cell selection technologies used here determined an excellent CD34+ cell purity and an optimal depletion of T cells. The high rate of viral complications is probably due to the inability of residual T cells left from the CD34+ cell selection to generate, immediately after transplant, an adequate number of virus-specific lymphocytes.