High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: a prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE: To evaluate a high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional (3D) contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiographic technique for detecting proximal and distal renal arterial stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients underwent high-spatial-resolution small-field-of-view (FOV) 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries, which was followed several minutes later by more standard, large-FOV 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography that included the distal aorta and iliac arteries. For both acquisitions, MR fluoroscopic triggering and an elliptic centric view order were used. Two readers evaluated the MR angiograms for grade and hemodynamic significance of renal arterial stenosis, diagnostic quality, and presence of artifacts. MR imaging results for each patient were compared with those of digital subtraction angiograms. RESULTS: The high-spatial-resolution small-FOV technique provided high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (92%) for the detection of renal arterial stenosis, including all four distal stenoses encountered. The portrayal of the segmental renal arteries was adequate for diagnosis in 19 (76%) of 25 patients. In 12% of the patients, impaired depiction of the segmental arteries was linked to motion. CONCLUSION: The combined high-spatial-resolution small-FOV and large-FOV MR angiographic examination provides improved spatial resolution in the region of the renal arteries while maintaining coverage of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries.     

Assessment of aortoiliac and renal arteries: MR angiography with parallel acquisition versus conventional MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the image quality, sensitivity, and specificity of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography accelerated by parallel acquisition (ie, fast MR angiography) with MR angiography not accelerated by parallel acquisition (ie, conventional MR angiography) for assessment of aortoiliac and renal arteries, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was obtained from all patients. Forty consecutive patients (33 men, seven women; mean age, 63 years) suspected of having aortoiliac and renal arterial stenoses and thus examined with DSA underwent both fast (mean imaging time, 17 seconds) and conventional (mean imaging time, 29 seconds) MR angiography. The arterial tree was divided into segments for image analysis. Two readers independently evaluated all MR angiograms for image quality, presence of arterial stenosis, and renal arterial variants. Image quality, sensitivity, and specificity were analyzed on per-patient and per-segment bases for multiple comparisons (with Bonferroni correction) and for dependencies between segments (with patient as the primary sample unit). Interobserver agreement was evaluated by using kappa statistics. RESULTS: Overall, the image quality with fast MR angiography was significantly better (P=.001) than that with conventional MR angiography. At per-segment analysis, the image quality of fast MR angiograms of the distal renal artery tended to be better than that of conventional MR angiograms of these vessels. Differences in sensitivity for the detection of arterial stenosis between the two MR angiography techniques were not significant for either reader. Interobserver agreement in the detection of variant renal artery anatomy was excellent with both conventional and fast MR angiography (kappa=1.00). CONCLUSION: Fast MR angiography and conventional MR angiography do not differ significantly in terms of arterial stenosis grading or renal arterial variant detection.     

Assessment of gadolinium-enhanced time-resolved three-dimensional MR angiography for evaluating renal artery stenosis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the image quality of gadolinium-enhanced time-resolved three-dimensional (3D) MR angiography and to evaluate its accuracy in revealing renal artery stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients underwent MR angiography using an ultrafast 3D Fourier transform spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state (TR/TE range, 2.6/0.7--0.8). Five seconds after administration of 15--20 mL gadodiamide hydrate, four or five consecutive data sets with imaging times of 7.0--7.6 sec were acquired during a single breath-hold. A timing examination was not performed. Image quality was assessed using quantitative analysis (signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise, and venous-to-arterial enhancement ratios) and qualitative analysis (presence of venous overlap, presence of artifacts, and degree of renal arterial enhancement). MR angiography depiction of the renal artery stenosis was evaluated using conventional angiography as the standard of reference. RESULTS: On the best arterial phase, average aortic signal-to-noise ratio (+/-SD) was 74.5 +/- 24.4, aorta-to--inferior vena cava contrast-to-noise ratio was 70.8 +/- 23.4, and inferior vena cava--to-aorta venous-to-arterial enhancement ratio was 0.03 +/- 0.04. No venous overlap was seen in 38 of 39 patients. Substantial enhancement of renal arteries was seen in all patients without any noticeable artifacts. MR angiography correctly depicted the degree of stenosis in 44 of 47 normal arteries, 13 of 16 mildly stenotic arteries, five of five moderately stenotic arteries, three of four severely stenotic arteries, and one of one occluded artery. Sensitivity and specificity for revealing greater than 50% stenosis was 100%. CONCLUSION: Time-resolved 3D MR angiography can provide high-quality arteriograms. Its performance in revealing renal artery stenosis is comparable with that of conventional angiography.     

Value of image subtraction in 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries

The objective of this study was to evaluate quantitatively and qualitatively the effect of image subtraction on the image quality of three-dimensional (3D) gadolinium-enhanced MR angiograms of the renal arteries. Breath-hold 3D gadolinium MR angiography (MRA) as well as conventional contrast angiography of the renal arteries was performed on 20 patients with suspected renovascular hypertension. MR angiograms were acquired before and during dynamic infusion of gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA). Contrast-enhanced images were compared with images that had undergone voxel-by-voxel signal intensity subtraction of contrast-enhanced data from precontrast data. One false positive finding for significant renal artery stenosis was recorded with MRA using conventional angiography as the gold standard. Image subtraction did not alter the diagnosis at MRA in any case. The mean contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was significantly higher (P < .05) on the subtraction MR angiograms compared to the nonsubtracted MR angiograms. There was no significant difference in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Qualitative analysis revealed a significant improvement in image quality after image subtraction with respect to visualization of the distal renal arteries. In conclusion, image subtraction improves the quality of renal MRA in terms of both CNR and visualization of the distal renal arteries.     

Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography using selective inversion recovery RAGE with fat saturation and ECG-triggering: Application to renal arteries

A three-dimensional (3D), ECG-triggered, selective inversion recovery (SIR) rapid gradient-echo (RAGE) technique is proposed to obtain MR angiograms of the main renal arteries. By using the selective inversion recovery and fat saturation, the background is significantly suppressed while blood maintains a high signal intensity as compared with conventional 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography. The sequence is ECG-triggered so that blood in-flow is maximized during systole, and intravoxel dephasing and pulsatile flow artifacts are minimized by collecting data during diastole. As a result, vessel boundary blurring and ghosting artifacts due to background motion are dramatically reduced, and the conspicuity and lumen definition of the arteries are significantly improved. High-quality MR angiograms of the main renal arteries with excellent blood/tissue contrast and suppression of motion artifacts have been consistently obtained for normal volunteers, with the length of visualization being 51 ± 07 mm for the left, and 57 ± 06 mm for the right renal arteries, significantly greater than using conventional 3D TOF pulse sequences. Statistical analysis was performed by using a one-sided Student's t test. Key words: renal artery; MR angiography; three-dimensional MR imaging.     

Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: a pilot comparison of maximum intensity projection, multiplanar reformatting, and 3D volume-rendering postprocessing algorithms

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors compared diagnostic accuracy of maximum intensity projection (MIP), multiplanar reformatting (MPR), and three-dimensional (3D) volume rendering (VR) in the evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the renal arteries. They hypothesized that VR is as accurate as or more accurate than MIP and MPR at depicting renal artery stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 28 consecutive patients who underwent gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the renal arteries. Studies were postprocessed to display images in MIP, MPR, and VR formats. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA), when performed (nine of 28 patients), was the standard for comparison. For each main renal artery, an estimate of percentage stenosis was made for any stenoses detected by three independent radiologists. For calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, MR angiographic stenosis estimates were categorized as mild (0%-39%), moderate (40%-69%), or severe (> or = 70%). DSA stenosis estimates of 70% or greater were considered hemodynamically significant. RESULTS: Analysis of variance demonstrated MIP estimates of stenosis were statistically greater than VR estimates in two readers and greater than MPR estimates in all readers for all patients. MIP images also showed the largest mean difference from DSA stenosis estimates for all three readers. For both VR and MPR, mean differences between MR angiographic stenoses estimates and DSA estimates reached significance for only one reader, whereas, for MIP versus DSA, mean differences reached significance for all three readers. Although not statistically significant compared with DSA, accuracies of VR (87%) and MPR (89%) were greater than that of MIP (81%). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, MIP was the least accurate of the three image display algorithms tested. VR and MPR yielded similar values for each method of comparison.     

Time-of-flight MR angiography of kidney transplants

The aim of the study was to apply time-of-flight MR angiography to renal transplant arteries with comparison of two- and three-dimensional (2D and 3D) sequences and to correlate the findings with colour flow sonography (CFS) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). A total of 102 MR studies were performed in 101 patients: 87 with the 2D-FLASH sequence (18 repeated after Gd-DOTA administration), 49 with the 3D-FISP (both in 34). All patients were also studied with CFS and 15 with intra-arterial DSA. The 3D sequence produced good-quality MR angiograms in 94% of cases (82% in 2D). Gd-DOTA infusion improved the quality of the 2D angiograms in 7 of 18 cases. Only these patients were included in the remainder of the evaluation (90 patients with 103 arteries). CFS showed 72 normal and 10 abnormal arteries. In this group, the 2D sequence led to 7 (12%) false positives of stenosis and the 3D sequence yielded 1 (3%). Correlation between MR angiography and DSA was obtained for 21 arteries (15 patients) with suspicion of arterial complications. The 2D-FLASH (n = 13) and the 3D-FISP (n = 12) MR sequences allowed the correct diagnosis of all main artery complications (14 stenoses and 4 thromboses) without any false negatives and without discordance when both sequences were performed (n = 4). In the 3 other cases with a normal main artery, 2 segmental thromboses were correctly identified by both sequences and 1 stenosis of a segmental branch was correctly identified by the 2D sequence only but misdiagnosed as a thrombosis with the 3D sequence. Grading of the severity of stenoses was inaccurate with both sequences. It is concluded that the 3D time-of-flight MR sequence provides better MR angiograms than the 2D, with fewer false positives for stenosis. No false-negative arterial complications were noted. Correspondence to: N. Grenier     

Standard dose Gd-DTPA dynamic MR of renal arteries

Renal MR contrast enhancement depends on the timing of image acquisition. Limited human trials have demonstrated efficacy of renal artery stents on salvage of renal function. This study assessed the ability of dynamic gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) administration to demonstrate renal artery stenosis and renal stent patency compared to conventional angiography as the gold standard. Twenty subjects referred for renal angiography underwent 22 dynamic MR studies, including 7 with renal artery stenting (Palmaz P204 or P201, Johnson & Johnson, Sydney, Australia). All were examined with conventional angiography and after dynamic Gd-DTPA infusion. Coronal MR images of the kidneys were acquired using a GE Signa 1.5-T magnet (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) (fast spoiled gradient echo [FSPGR]; TE = 4.2 msec, TR = 68–150 msec, flip angle = 75°) 0 to 600 seconds after iv bolus injection of 15 ml of Gd-DTPA during sequential breath-hold acquisitions, 13 to 32 seconds each. All 51 renal arteries (13 stenosed, 38 normal) were detected with dynamic MRI. Severity of renal artery stenosis was classified correctly with an accuracy of 98% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85–100), yielding 98% specificity and 100% sensitivity. All nine renal stents were visualized with 100% accurate patency documentation. FSPGR MRI with bolus Gd-DTPA administration can provide adequate time and spatial resolution to demonstrate renal artery stenosis.     

Accuracy of normal-dose contrast-enhanced MR angiography in assessing renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries using a standard dose of gadolinium. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients suspected of having renal artery stenosis underwent MR angiography and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography, which was the method of reference. Three-dimensional gradient-echo MR subtraction angiography (TR/TE, 5.8/1.8 msec) was performed on a 1.5-T imager using a phased array body coil. Before imaging, a separate timing bolus sequence was used, administering 1.0 ml of contrast agent. Gadopentetate dimeglumine (15 ml) was injected using an MR power injector. Two observers, who were unaware of each other's interpretation and of MR findings, assessed digital subtraction angiography. Likewise, two other observers assessed MR angiography. RESULTS: Digital subtraction angiography depicted 75 main and 17 accessory renal arteries (n = 92). All main renal arteries and 13 accessory renal arteries were identified on MR angiography. Compared with digital subtraction angiography, MR imaging correctly classified 57 of 66 arteries without a hemodynamically significant stenosis (0-49%), 22 of 22 arteries as significantly stenotic (50-99%), and four of four occluded arteries; five stenoses were overestimated. There was one false-positive finding of an accessory renal artery on MR angiography that was identified retrospectively on digital subtraction angiography. Interobserver agreement was high. Sensitivity and specificity for grading significant stenosis were 100% and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography, using +/-0.1 mmol/kg of gadolinium, is an accurate method in the assessment of renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries.     

Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: preliminary results.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced fast three-dimensional (3D) MR angiography in depicting both the carotid and vertebral arteries in their cervical portions and to compare MR angiography with conventional angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic disease.METHODSTwenty-seven patients with ischemic cerebral events in the anterior (n = 18) and posterior (n = 9) circulation underwent contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography in the coronal plane. MR angiograms were examined in a blinded fashion by two observers independently. Stenosis was classified according to the appearance of the residual lumen (no stenosis, mild stenosis, moderate stenosis, severe stenosis, occlusion). Conventional angiography was used as the standard of reference.RESULTSProximal great vessels and carotid siphons were not assessable on MR angiograms in 35% of cases owing to limited coverage. All cervical and petrous segments of the internal carotid arteries (ICAs) and 93% of the extracranial vertebral arteries were assessable. Flow-related artifacts were observed in seven cases of severe stenosis, including three with signal void at the site of narrowing and four with signal loss in the distal ICA. Interobserver agreement was good and significant. Overall agreement between 3D MR angiography and conventional angiography was good for the anterior and posterior circulations despite a tendency toward overestimation of stenoses on MR angiograms. Clinically relevant stenoses and occlusions were correctly identified on 3D MR angiograms, providing good sensitivity and specificity.CONCLUSIONContrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography is a promising tool for assessing arteriosclerotic lesions of supraaortic vessels. Further studies with larger groups are required to determine its value for patient care.     

Diagnosis of renal vascular disease with MR angiography.

Renal magnetic resonance (MR) angiography allows accurate evaluation of patients suspected to have renal artery stenosis without the risks associated with nephrotoxic contrast agents, ionizing radiation, or arterial catheterization. Other applications of renal MR angiography are mapping the vascular anatomy for planning renal revascularization, planning repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms, assessing renal bypass grafts and renal transplant anastomoses, and evaluating vascular involvement by renal tumors. A variety of pulse sequences provide complementary information about kidney morphology, arterial anatomy, blood flow, and renal function and excretion. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography can be combined with several other sequences to produce a comprehensive approach to renal MR angiography. This comprehensive approach is designed to allow hemodynamic characterization of renal artery stenosis with a single MR imaging examination that can be easily completed in 1 hour. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography demonstrates the renal arteries along with the abdominal aorta, iliac arteries, and mesenteric arteries in a 20-30-second acquisition that can be performed during breath holding. Numerous projections are reconstructed from a single three-dimensional volume of data acquired with a single injection of contrast material to obtain perpendicular and optimized views of each renal artery.     

Intraarterial versus IV gadolinium injections for MR angiography: quantitative and qualitative assessment of the infrainguinal arteries

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to quantitatively and qualitatively compare 3D intraarterial (IA) gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (IA MRA) versus the standard of reference of MR angiography, 3D IV gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography (IV MRA), in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) for use during catheter-based MR-guided endovascular interventions. CONCLUSION: IA MRA provides image quality of the infrainguinal arteries in PAOD patients comparable to IV MRA with a significantly improved assessment of the infrapopliteal arteries due to reduced venous contamination. Further benefits of IA MRA include usage of only very low doses of gadolinium and simplified bolus timing.     

Separation of arteries and veins in 3D MR angiography using correlation analysis.

Multiphase contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography (MRA) data sets allow the separate visualization of the arterial and venous pulmonary vasculature. However, due to short arterial-to-venous bolus transit times in the lung, the generation of pure venograms without arterial overlay is difficult. To suppress arterial signal in venograms, early arterial phase data are typically subtracted from peak venous phase images. In this study, a correlation algorithm is used to postprocess the multiphase 3D MRA data sets. The cross-correlation between a measured arterial or venous reference function and the local signal-time course is computed which highlights image locations with a similar signal-time curve as the reference function and suppresses constant signal. Conventional maximum intensity projections (MIP) are generated from the arterial and venous correlation maps. In a study with five volunteers, an increase in SNR by a factor of 2.1 (1.8) of arterial (venous) correlation MIP images over subtraction MIP images was observed.     

Aortoiliac and renal arteries: prospective intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography

PURPOSE: To compare contrast material-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) angiography in the same patients for assessment of the aortoiliac and renal arteries, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the standard of reference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DSA, 3D MR angiography, and multi-detector row CT angiography were performed in 46 consecutive patients. A total of 769 arterial segments were analyzed for arterial stenosis by using a four-point grading system. Aneurysmal changes were noted. The time required for performing 3D reconstructions and image analysis of both MR and CT data sets was measured. Patient acceptance for each modality was assessed with a visual analogue scale. Statistical analysis of data was performed. RESULTS: Sensitivity of MR angiography for detection of hemodynamically significant arterial stenosis was 92% for reader 1 and 93% for reader 2, and specificity was 100% and 99%, respectively. Sensitivity of CT angiography was 91% for reader 1 and 92% for reader 2, and specificity was 99% and 99%, respectively. Differences between the two modalities were not significant. Interobserver and intermodality agreement was excellent (kappa = 0.88-0.90). The time for performance of 3D reconstruction and image analysis of CT data sets was significantly longer than that for MR data sets (P <.001). Patient acceptance was best for CT angiography (P =.016). CONCLUSION: There is no statistically significant difference between 3D MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography in the detection of hemodynamically significant arterial stenosis of the aortoiliac and renal arteries.     

Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with an elliptical centric view for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of high spatial resolution, selective arterial phase, 3D contrast-enhanced (CE) MR angiography with first pass bolus, software-trigger, elliptical centric view ordering in the detection of intracranial aneurysms. Our study included nine consecutive patients with ten intracranial aneurysms. 3D TOF MR angiography and 3D CE MR angiography were carried out with a 1.5-T MR scanner. 3D CE MR angiography was performed with an automated bolus detection algorithm and elliptical centric view order using ultrafast SPGR with a spatial resolution of 0.63×0.83×0.5 mm and imaging time of 55 s. Observers detected seven of ten aneurysms on 3D TOF MR angiograms and nine of ten aneurysms on 3D CE MR angiograms. 3D CE MR angiography clearly revealed an IC-PC aneurysm with a relatively smaller neck, a broad-based small aneurysm originating from tortuous and dilated MCA bifurcation, and a residual aneurysm and parent vessels adjacent to metallic aneurysmal clips, which had relatively low signal intensities on 3D TOF MR angiograms. 3D CE MR angiography was found to be a good and promising technique for detecting intracranial aneurysms with small necks and slow flow, vasculature with aneurysmal clips and tortuous vasculature with disturbed flow.     

Distal lower extremity imaging: prospective comparison of 2-dimensional time of flight, 3-dimensional time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and 3-dimensional bolus chase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography

OBJECTIVE: To compare the 2-dimensional time of flight, the 3-dimensional time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, and the 3-dimensional 3-station bolus chase contrast-enhanced MR angiography in assessing distal station atherosclerosis. METHODS: Two-dimensional time of flight, 3-dimensional time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography, and 3-dimensional bolus chase contrast-enhanced MR angiography were performed from the knees to the metatarsal heads of 40 patients. Blinded to the patients' identity, 2 readers independently reviewed the 3 sequences in random order; differences were resolved by consensus. Anterior tibial, peroneal, and posterior tibial arterial lengths to the talar dome were scored as follows: 1, greater than 50% of the length of a normal artery; 2, less than 50%; and 3, total occlusion. Stenoses were scored as follows: 1, less than 50%; and 2, greater than 50%. The pedal vessels (dorsalis pedis, posterior tibial, and plantar pedal arch arteries) were scored as follows: 1, less than 50% stenosis; and 2, greater than 50% stenosis. The reference standard was a combined interpretation of all 3 sequences by both readers in consensus. RESULTS: For the 240 calf segments scored for length, concordance with reference assessment was poorer for the time of flight than for either the bolus chase or time-resolved angiography (P = 0.0021 and P = 0.0082, respectively), and the latter two were statistically indistinguishable. For stenosis grading of the 461 calf and pedal segments, the time-resolved and bolus chase methods were superior to the time of flight (P = <0.0001 and P = 0.0041, respectively), and the contrast-enhanced methods were statistically indistinguishable. CONCLUSIONS: Both contrast-enhanced time-resolved and bolus chase MR angiography are superior to the time of flight in diagnosing distal station peripheral vascular disease.     

Renal artery assessment with nonenhanced steady-state free precession versus contrast-enhanced MR angiography

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess the diagnostic accuracy of nonenhanced three-dimensional (3D) steady-state free precession (SSFP) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for detection of renal artery stenosis (RAS), with breath-hold contrast material-enhanced MR angiography performed as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was local ethics committee approved; all patients gave written informed consent. Fifty-three patients (30 male, 23 female; mean age, 58 years) with arterial hypertension and suspected of having RAS were examined with 1.5-T 3D SSFP renal MR angiography. Stenosis grade, maximal visible vessel length, and subjective image quality were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated on artery-by-artery and patient-by-patient bases. The significance of the results was assessed with the paired two-sided t test for continuous variables and with the marginal homogeneity test for categorical variables. Cohen kappa statistics were used to estimate interobserver agreement. RESULTS: One hundred eight renal arteries with 20 significant (>or=50%) stenoses were detected with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. At artery-by-artery analysis, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and NPV of nonenhanced SSFP MR angiography for RAS detection were 100%, 93%, 94%, and 100%, respectively, for observer 1 and 95%, 95%, 95%, and 99%, respectively, for observer 2. Corresponding patient-by-patient values were 100%, 92%, 94%, and 100%, respectively, for observer 1 and 100%, 95%, 96%, and 100%, respectively, for observer 2. Overestimation of stenosis grade with SSFP MR angiography resulted in six and four false-positive findings for readers 1 and 2, respectively. Mean maximal visible lengths of the renal arteries were 69.9 mm at contrast-enhanced MR angiography and 61.1 mm at SSFP MR angiography (P<.001). Both techniques yielded good to excellent image quality. CONCLUSION: Slab-selective inversion-prepared 3D SSFP MR angiography had high sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and NPV for RAS detection, without the need for contrast material. However, RAS severity was overestimated in some patients.     

Lower extremity: low-dose contrast agent intraarterial MR angiography in patients--initial results

Institutional review board approval and patient consent were obtained. A low-dose injection protocol for intraarterial three-dimensional (3D) gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography was derived from femoral flow phantom studies and prospectively evaluated in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). All MR angiograms were obtained at 1.5 T with a T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence. MR angiograms of a gadolinium dilution series (0.8-200.0 mmol/L) were acquired in a femoral phantom at different flow rates. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) above the 75% threshold of the measured maximum were considered optimal. The lowest optimal concentration was injected intraarterially in nine patients to obtain 3D MR angiograms of the thigh and calf station. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated for four arterial segments. The low optimal concentration of 50 mmol/L (20-mL bolus volume), about 5% of the total permissible dose, showed SNRs larger than the 75% threshold in the phantom study. In patients, this concentration led to high-spatial-resolution angiograms with mean CNRs of 70.0 +/- 14.5 (+/- standard deviation) for the superficial femoral artery and 47.5 +/- 13.4 at the infrapopliteal level. Low-dose contrast agent intraarterial 3D MR angiography showed high arterial enhancement, enabling assessment of lower extremity arteries in patients with PAOD and multiple injections--a crucial precondition for MR-guided endovascular interventions.     

Timing algorithm for bolus chase MR digital subtraction angiography

Acquire multiple longitudinal locations in the lower extremity after a single contrast injection, appropriate table translation and contrast injection are required. An approximate model based on constant bolus velocity was developed to describe the space-time course of a contrast bolus in the lower extremity. This model was verified in dynamic MR angiograms acquired in a group of patients using time-resolved 2D MR digital subtraction angiography (MRDSA). From this contrast bolus passage model, a timing algorithm for table translation and contrast injection was developed for bolus chase MRDSA, subsequently validated in bolus chase 2D MRDSA experiments. All targeted major peripheral arteries were well depicted in bolus chase 2D MRDSA using this timing algorithm and a single 15-ml contrast dose.     

Evaluation of dynamic gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate a three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography sequence using standard MR gradients in detecting renal artery stenosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients referred for angiography for suspected renal artery stenosis underwent both conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and MR angiography. MR angiography was performed on a 1.5-T scanner with standard gradients. A fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-echo sequence was used with the following parameters: TR/TE, 10.3/1.9; flip angle, 45 degrees; field of view, 36 x 32 cm; matrix size, 256 x 128; one excitation; volume thickness, 70 mm; and partitions, 28. Gadolinium was administered IV as a dynamic bolus of 30-40 ml. Conventional and MR angiographic images were interpreted by two radiologists in consensus. RESULTS: DSA revealed 87 renal arteries, of which 79 were in 35 patients with native kidneys and eight arteries were in seven patients with transplanted kidneys. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography showed 85 (98%) of 87 renal arteries. Seventeen patients had 20 significant (>50% stenosis) renal artery stenoses and five patients had five occluded renal arteries revealed by DSA. MR angiography revealed 85 renal arteries (98%), 20 stenoses (100%), and five occlusions (100%). Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography led to one false-positive interpretation for renal artery stenosis and no false-negative interpretations. Thus, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR angiography for renal artery stenosis were 100%, 98%, and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The MR angiography pulse sequence we used was an effective and reliable technique for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis. The sequence can be performed on widely available MR equipment that does not require fast gradient hardware.