Modality-specific sensory changes in humans after the induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) in cutaneous nociceptive pathways

The impact of long-term potentiation (LTP) in nociceptive pathways on somatosensory perception was examined by means of quantitative sensory testing (QST) in the ventral forearm of 12 healthy human subjects. Electrical high-frequency stimulation of the forearm skin (HFS; 5 x 1 s at 100 Hz and 10 x detection threshold) led to an abrupt increase of pain to single electrical test stimuli, which were applied through the same electrode (perceptual LTP +72%, p<0.01). Perceptual LTP outlasted the 1-h observation period. The effects of HFS on somatosensory perception of natural test stimuli in the conditioned skin area were restricted to mechanical submodalities. Subjects exhibited a significant decrease of pain threshold and an increase of pain ratings to suprathreshold pinprick stimuli (p<0.01). In 5 out of 12 subjects (42%) light tactile stimuli led to painful sensations (dynamic mechanical allodynia). Furthermore, a small but significant decrease of threshold to blunt pressure stimuli (p<0.05) was found. In contrast, all thermal modalities comprising cold and warm detection thresholds, cold and heat pain thresholds as well as pain summation (perceptual wind up) remained unaltered. These data show that HFS of peptidergic cutaneous C-fiber afferents predominantly modulates Adelta- and Abeta-fiber mediated somatosensory functions, suggesting that LTP in nociceptive pathways enhances human pain sensitivity via interaction of two afferent pathways (extrinsic sensitization).     

Reference values for quantitative sensory testing in children and adolescents: Developmental and gender differences of somatosensory perception

The Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) protocol of the German research network on neuropathic pain (DFNS) encompassing all somatosensory modalities assesses the functioning of different nerve fibers and of central pathways. The aim of our study was: (1) to explore, whether this QST protocol is feasible for children, (2) to detect distribution properties of QST data and the impact of body site, age and gender and (3) to establish reference values for QST in children and adolescents. The QST protocol of the DFNS with modification of instructions and pain rating was used in 176 children aged 6.12–16.12 years for six body sites. QST was feasible for children over 5 years of age. ANOVAs revealed developmental, gender and body site differences of somatosensory functions similar to adults. The face was more sensitive than the hand and/or foot. Younger children (6–8 years) were generally less sensitive to all thermal and mechanical detection stimuli but more sensitive to all pain stimuli than older (9–12 years) children, whereas there were little differences between older children and adolescents (13–17 years). Girls were more sensitive to thermal detection and pain stimuli, but not to mechanical detection and pain stimuli. Reference values differ from adults, but distribution properties (range, variance, and side differences) were similar and plausible for statistical factors. Our results demonstrate that the full QST protocol is feasible and valid for children over 5 years of age with their own reference values.     

Quantitative sensory testing: a comprehensive protocol for clinical trials.

We have compiled a comprehensive QST protocol as part of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) using well established tests for nearly all aspects of somatosensation. This protocol encompasses thermal as well as mechanical testing procedures. Our rationale was to test for patterns of sensory loss (small and large nerve fiber functions) or gain (hyperalgesia, allodynia, hyperpathia), and to assess both cutaneous and deep pain sensitivity. The practicality of the QST protocol was tested in 18 healthy subjects, 21-58 years, half of them female. All subjects were tested bilaterally over face, hand and foot. We determined thermal detection and pain thresholds including a test for the presence of paradoxical heat sensations, mechanical detection thresholds to von Frey filaments and a 64-Hz tuning fork, mechanical pain thresholds to pinprick stimuli and blunt pressure, stimulus-response-functions for pinprick and dynamic mechanical allodynia (pain to light touch), and pain summation (wind-up ratio) using repetitive pinprick stimulation. The full protocol took 27+/-2.3 min per test area. The majority of QST parameters were normally distributed only after logarithmic transformation (secondary normalization) except for the frequency of paradoxical heat sensations, cold and heat pain thresholds, and for vibration detection thresholds. Thresholds were usually lowest over face, followed by hand, and then foot. Only thermal pain thresholds, wind-up ratio and vibration detection thresholds were not significantly dependent on the body region. There was no significant right-to-left difference for any of the QST parameters; left-to-right correlation coefficients ranged between 0.78 and 0.97, thus explaining between 61% and 94% of the variance. This study has shown that a complete somatosensory profile of one affected area and one unaffected control area, which will be necessary to characterize patients with a variety of diseases, can be obtained within 1 h. Case examples of selected patients illustrate the value of z-transformed QST data for an easy survey of individual symptom profiles.     

Lidocaine patch (5%) produces a selective, but incomplete block of Aδ and C fibers

Topical lidocaine (5%) leads to sufficient pain relief in only 29%-80% of treated patients, presumably by small-fiber block. The reasons for nonresponse are unclear; it may be due to different underlying pain mechanisms or partly insufficient anesthetic effect. Using quantitative sensory testing (QST) following the protocol of the DFNS (German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain), this study aims to assess the type and extent of somatosensory changes after lidocaine application in healthy volunteers. Twenty-six healthy volunteers underwent QST on the volar forearm, including thermal and mechanical detection and pain thresholds, twice before (for baseline retest reliability) and once after 6-hour simultaneous application with lidocaine patch 5% and contralateral placebo in a double-blinded manner. Pre and post differences of QST parameters were analyzed by paired t-test (Bonferroni-corrected alpha 0.0023). QST profiles did not change between the 2 baseline measurements and after the placebo application. Lidocaine application led to a significant change of only the small-fiber-associated thresholds (increase of thermal detection and mechanical pain thresholds, decrease of mechanical pain sensitivity). Tactile detection thresholds representing Aβ function remained unchanged. Interindividually, the extent of the small-fiber block varied widely (eg, thermal detection thresholds: in 54% of the subjects there were only minimal changes; in only 8% were there changes of >60% of the maximal achievable value). Topical lidocaine (5%) induces thermal hypoesthesia and pinprick hypoalgesia, suggesting an isolated but only partial block of Aδ and C fibers of unpredictable extent. Further studies must analyze the influencing factors and determine whether patients with poor analgesic effect, in particular, are those with insufficient small-fiber block.     

Reference data for quantitative sensory testing (QST): refined stratification for age and a novel method for statistical comparison of group data

Clinical use of quantitative sensory testing (QST) requires standardization. The German research network on neuropathic pain (DFNS) solves this problem by defining reference data stratified for test site, gender and age for a standardized QST protocol. In this report we have targeted two further problems: how to adjust for age-related sensory changes, and how to compare groups of patients with the reference database. We applied a moving average across ages to define reference values per decade. This analysis revealed that women were more sensitive to heat pain independent of age. In contrast, functions were converging at older age for blunt pressure pain, but diverging for punctate mechanical pain (pin prick). The probability that an individual patient dataset is within the range of normal variability is calculated by z-transform using site-, gender- and age-specific reference data. To compare groups of patients with reference data, we evaluated two techniques: A: paired t-test versus fixed mean; i.e. the reference mean value is considered as the known population mean, B: non-paired t-test versus the reference dataset and number of cases restrained to the same number of cases as the patient data set. Simulations for various sample sizes and variances showed that method B was more conservative than method A. We present a simple way of calculating method B for data that have been z-normalized. This technique makes the DFNS reference data bank applicable for researchers beyond the DFNS community without a need for subsampling of subjects from the database.     

Somatosensory abnormalities in atypical odontalgia: A case-control study

Somatosensory function in patients with persistent idiopathic types of orofacial pain like atypical odontalgia (AO) is not well described. This study tested the hypothesis that AO patients have significantly more somatosensory abnormalities than age- and sex-matched controls. Forty-six AO patients and 35 controls participated. Inclusion criteria for AO were pain in a region where a tooth had been endodontically or surgically treated, persistent pain >6 months, and lack of clinical and radiological findings. The examination included qualitative tests and a battery of intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST). Most AO patients (85%) had qualitative somatosensory abnormality compared with few controls (14%). The most common qualitative abnormalities in AO patients were found with pin-prick 67.4%, cold 47.8%, and touch 46.5% compared with 11.4%, 8.6%, and 2.9%, respectively, in the control group (P<0.001). Between-group differences were seen for many intraoral QST: mechanical detection threshold, mechanical pain threshold (pinprick), dynamic mechanical allodynia (brush), dynamic mechanical allodynia (vibration), wind-up ratio, and pressure pain threshold (P<0.01). In the trigeminal area, between-group differences in thermal thresholds were nonsignificant while differences in cold detection at the thenar eminence were significant. Individual somatosensory profiles revealed complex patterns with hyper- and hyposensitivity to intraoral QST. Between-group differences in pressure pain thresholds (P<0.02) were observed at the thenar eminence. In conclusion, significant abnormalities in intraoral somatosensory function were observed in AO, which may reflect peripheral and central sensitization of trigeminal pathways. More generalized sensitization of the nociceptive system may also be part of AO pathophysiology.     

Sensory signs in complex regional pain syndrome and peripheral nerve injury

This study determined patterns of sensory signs in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I and II and peripheral nerve injury (PNI). Patients with upper-limb CRPS-I (n=298), CRPS-II (n=46), and PNI (n=72) were examined with quantitative sensory testing according to the protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain. The majority of patients (66%-69%) exhibited a combination of sensory loss and gain. Patients with CRPS-I had more sensory gain (heat and pressure pain) and less sensory loss than patients with PNI (thermal and mechanical detection, hypoalgesia to heat or pinprick). CRPS-II patients shared features of CRPS-I and PNI. CRPS-I and CRPS-II had almost identical somatosensory profiles, with the exception of a stronger loss of mechanical detection in CRPS-II. In CRPS-I and -II, cold hyperalgesia/allodynia (28%-31%) and dynamic mechanical allodynia (24%-28%) were less frequent than heat or pressure hyperalgesia (36%-44%, 67%-73%), and mechanical hypoesthesia (31%-55%) was more frequent than thermal hypoesthesia (30%-44%). About 82% of PNI patients had at least one type of sensory gain. QST demonstrates more sensory loss in CRPS-I than hitherto considered, suggesting either minimal nerve injury or central inhibition. Sensory profiles suggest that CRPS-I and CRPS-II may represent one disease continuum. However, in contrast to recent suggestions, small fiber deficits were less frequent than large fiber deficits. Sensory gain is highly prevalent in PNI, indicating a better similarity of animal models to human patients than previously thought. These sensory profiles should help prioritize approaches for translation between animal and human research.     

Depression and changed pain perception: hints for a central disinhibition mechanism

Although patients with a depressive disorder report often of pain, their sensitivity to experimental pain is controversial, probably due to differences in sensory testing methods and to the lack of normal values. Therefore, we used a standardized and validated comprehensive sensory testing paradigm to assess the peripheral and central nervous system performance in depressive patients compared to healthy controls and chronic pain patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), in which depression is a common comorbidity. Twenty-five depressive psychiatric inpatients (pain-free: n=20), 35 FMS outpatients and 25 healthy controls underwent quantitative sensory testing (QST), including thermal and mechanical detection and pain thresholds, pain sensitivity and responsiveness to repetitive noxious mechanical stimuli (wind-up). In depressive disorder (to a lesser extent also in FMS), significantly decreased cold pain thresholds and an increased wind-up were found, although the mechanical pain thresholds and pain sensitivity were comparable to those of the healthy controls. All the detection thresholds were within the normal range in all the groups. In depressive disorder, there were no significant side differences in the detection and pain thresholds. The results contradict the former assumption of a general insensitivity to experimental pain in depressive disorder. In the mostly pain-free patients signs of an enhanced central hyperexcitability are even more pronounced than usually found in chronic pain patients (e.g. FMS), indicating common mechanisms in depressive disorder and chronic pain in accordance with the assumption of non-pain associated mechanisms in depressive disorder for central hyperexcitability, e.g. by inhibited serotonergic function. Furthermore, this trial demonstrates the feasibility of QST in depressive patients.     

Cutaneous sensory abnormalities in children and adolescents with complex regional pain syndromes

Complex regional pain syndromes (CRPS) have been recognized with increasing frequency in children. These disorders appear to differ markedly from those observed in adults. The International Association for the Study of Pain diagnostic criteria for CRPS were developed based on adult studies; these criteria have not been validated for children. We performed standardized neurological examination and quantitative sensory testing (QST) in a group of pediatric patients to characterize features of sensory dysfunction. Forty-two patients, with unilateral lower extremity CRPS of a mean duration of the pain and symptoms of 12.6 months, who met IASP adult-based criteria for CRPS underwent standardized neurological examination and QST. QST parameters were compared to values previously derived from age- and sex-matched pediatric healthy controls. In most respects, QST parameters did not differ significantly between patients and the normal reference values except for cold and heat pain detection thresholds. Allodynia to cold and/or heat (P<0.001) occurred in 21 patients. Cold allodynia was the most common QST abnormality in our patients. Twenty-six patients showed a combination of mechanical dynamic and static allodynia and allodynia to punctate temporal summation. There was a significant correlation between mechanical dynamic allodynia and allodynia to punctate temporal summation (P<0.001). As with adult CRPS, the thermal and mechanical sensory abnormalities appear in different combinations in different patients with similar clinical presentations. In a majority of patients, the pathogenesis of pain is seemingly of central origin.     

Test order of quantitative sensory testing facilitates mechanical hyperalgesia in healthy volunteers

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) has become a widely used method to evaluate different submodalities of the somatic sensory system (predominantly) in patients with neuropathic pain. QST consists of 7 tests measuring 13 parameters in order to assess and quantify the perception of temperature, touch, pain, pressure, and vibration. The German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain implemented a standardized QST protocol including a defined testing order of the measurements. Accordingly, subjects tested with QST undergo thermal before mechanical testing. In the present study, we investigated the effect of testing order on the results of QST. Twenty healthy subjects were tested twice, 1 week apart with 2 different QST testing orders: the standardized testing order according to the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain and a modified testing order in which mechanical stimuli were applied before thermal stimuli. For the test protocol that began with thermal testing, subjects exhibited signs of an increased mechanical perception: The mechanical pain sensitivity was significantly increased (P = .001, Wilcoxon test) for each pinprick stimulator and the mechanical pain threshold was lowered by a factor of 2 when compared with the modified testing order in which mechanical parameters were tested at the beginning of the session without prior thermal stimulation. Thermal parameters were the same for both test-order paradigms. These data indicate that preceding mild thermal stimulation might lead to a sensitization to mechanical stimuli and thus to mechanical hyperalgesia. Alternative habituation mechanisms in the modified testing order resulting from repeated pinprick stimulation at the beginning should also be debated. QST is a helpful diagnostic tool but interpretation should be done with consideration of interaction between test parameters. Reference data are only valid in the testing order from which they are obtained. PERSPECTIVE: Present data showed that mechanical hyperalgesia followed thermal testing. This article demonstrates that the test order of quantitative sensory testing is relevant in interpreting the results obtained. Reference values are suitable in the test order from which they are obtained.     

Developmental and sex differences in somatosensory perception--a systematic comparison of 7- versus 14-year-olds using quantitative sensory testing

There are controversial discussions regarding developmental- and sex-related differences in somatosensory perception, which were found, eg, when comparing younger children (6–8 years), older children (9–12 years), and adolescents (13–16 years) using quantitative sensory testing (QST). The aim of our current study was to systematically assess the impact of age and sex using the QST protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS). QST, including thermal and mechanical detection and pain thresholds, was assessed in 86 healthy 7-year-old children (42 girls and 44 boys) and 87 healthy 14-year-old adolescents (43 girls and 44 boys). The sample size was calculated a priori to detect medium-sized effects as found in the previous studies with adequate power. Developmental and sex differences were tested using univariate analysis of variance. Children were more sensitive to most pain stimuli, except cold pain stimuli, compared with adolescents, but did not differ in mechanical and thermal detection thresholds except in regard to cold stimuli. Sex had an impact only on warm detection, with girls being more sensitive. There were no interactions between age and sex. In conclusion, developmental changes during the puberty appear to influence pain perception, whereas sex effects in childhood are negligible. At present, it is not clear what brings about the differences between adult men and women that are apparent in epidemiological studies. Our results contradict the hypothesis that differences in peripheral nerve-fiber functioning underlie sex effects.     

Intraoral somatosensory abnormalities in patients with atypical odontalgia—a controlled multicenter quantitative sensory testing study

Intraoral somatosensory sensitivity in patients with atypical odontalgia (AO) has not been investigated systematically according to the most recent guidelines. The aims of this study were to examine intraoral somatosensory disturbances in AO patients using healthy subjects as reference, and to evaluate the percent agreement between intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST) and qualitative sensory testing (QualST). Forty-seven AO patients and 69 healthy control subjects were included at Universities of Washington, Malmö, and Aarhus. In AO patients, intraoral somatosensory testing was performed on the painful site, the corresponding contralateral site, and at thenar. In healthy subjects, intraoral somatosensory testing was performed bilaterally on the upper premolar gingiva and at thenar. Thirteen QST and 3 QualST parameters were evaluated at each site, z-scores were computed for AO patients based on the healthy reference material, and LossGain scores were created. Compared with control subjects, 87.3% of AO patients had QST abnormalities. The most frequent somatosensory abnormalities in AO patients were somatosensory gain with regard to painful mechanical and cold stimuli and somatosensory loss with regard to cold detection and mechanical detection. The most frequent LossGain code was L0G2 (no somatosensory loss with gain of mechanical somatosensory function) (31.9% of AO patients). Percent agreement between corresponding QST and QualST measures of thermal and mechanical sensitivity ranged between 55.6% and 70.4% in AO patients and between 71.1% and 92.1% in control subjects. In conclusion, intraoral somatosensory abnormalities were commonly detected in AO patients, and agreement between quantitative and qualitative sensory testing was good to excellent.     

Variation in quantitative sensory testing and epidermal nerve fiber density in repeated measurements

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is commonly used to evaluate peripheral sensory function in neuropathic conditions. QST measures vary in repeated measurements of normal subjects but it is not known whether QST can reflect small changes in epidermal nerve fiber density (ENFd). This study evaluated QST measures (touch, mechanical pain, heat pain and innocuous cold sensations) for differences between genders and over time using ENFd as an objective-independent measure. QST was performed on the thighs of 36 healthy volunteers on four occasions between December and May. ENFd in skin biopsies was determined on three of those visits. Compared to men, women had a higher ENFd, a difference of 12.2 ENFs/mm. They also had lower tactile and innocuous cold thresholds, and detected mechanical pain (pinprick) at a higher frequency. Heat pain thresholds did not differ between genders. By the end of the 24-week study, men and women showed a small reduction (p < 0.05) in the frequency of sharp mechanical pain evoked by pinprick whereas tactile and thermal thresholds showed no change. This coincided with a small decrease in ENFd, 4.18 ENFs/mm. Variation in measurements over time was large in a fraction of normal subjects. We conclude that most QST measures detect relatively large differences in epidermal innervation (12.2 ENFs/mm), but response to mechanical pain was the only sensory modality tested with the sensitivity to detect small changes in innervation (4.18 ENFs/mm). Since some individuals had large unsystematic variations, unexpected test results should therefore alert clinicians to test additional locations.     

Modulation of Somatosensory Profiles by Spinal Cord Stimulation in Primary Raynaud′s Syndrome

Background and Goal: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective antinociceptive treatment for various neuropathic pain syndromes. Apart from antinociceptive action, it may modulate overall somatosensory perception. This case report targets the question of whether SCS may alter quantitative sensory testing (QST) in a patient with primary Raynaud′s syndrome. Materials and Methods: We report on a 44‐year‐old female patient with primary Raynaud′s syndrome who had SCS via cervical and lumbar electrodes. QST was performed in a standardized manner assessing cold detection threshold (CDT) and warm detection threshold (WDT), cold pain threshold (CPT) and heat pain threshold (HPT), mechanical detection threshold (MDT) and mechanical pain threshold (MPT) thresholds, and vibration detection threshold (VDT) and pressure pain thresholds (PPT). We tested at the dorsum of the right/left hand of the patient with engaged and disengaged SCS. Test results were compared with a control group of 80 subjects. Results: Without SCS, the patient showed a sensory decrease in CDT, MDT, MPT, and VDT. SCS influenced the perception of cold, warm, and tactile detection thresholds, whereby CDT, WDT, and VDT were impaired and MDT was improved. Conclusion: SCS significantly modulated the somatosensory profile in a patient with primary Raynaud′s syndrome. These effects were pronounced in qualities involving Aβ, C, and A? nerve fibers. Further investigations may help to understand the mechanisms of action of SCS.     

The influence of pain intensity on somatosensory perception in patients suffering from subacute/chronic lateral epicondylalgia.

A confounding factor in the analysis of chronic pain patients is the finding of signs of somatosensory disturbances not only in neuropathic pain patients but also in a subgroup of patients with musculoskeletal pain. The purpose was to investigate if patients suffering from subacute/chronic lateral epicondylalgia demonstrated altered sensibility, and if this was affected by pain intensity. At the start of the experiment, quantitative sensory testing (QST) (thermal, pressure pain, touch) was performed in the local pain area and in the area of pain referral. QST was repeated following pain provocation (weight lifting). A local anaesthetic was then injected into the lateral epicondyle and QST was repeated in the area of pain referral. The contralateral arm was assessed, treated and injected in the same way. At the baseline assessment there was no difference in sensibility between sides, with the exception of a significantly lowered threshold to noxious heat (p<0.04) in the area of pain referral, present during the whole experiment. In the affected arm only, weight lifting resulted in significantly increased pain intensity in the local (p<0.01) and referred (p<0.01) pain areas, respectively. Repeated muscle contractions resulted in altered somatosensory functions in both the affected arm and the unaffected arm, consequently not dependent on ongoing pain in the assessed area. Tactile perception thresholds increased significantly following pain provocation in the area of pain referral (p<0.04) only and normalized following injection of local anaesthetic (p<0.02), indicating that the sensitivity to light touch was altered by the nociceptive input from the affected arm.     

Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Reference data for the trunk and application in patients with chronic postherpetic neuralgia

Age- and gender-matched reference values are essential for the clinical use of quantitative sensory testing (QST). To extend the standard test sites for QST—according to the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain—to the trunk, we collected QST profiles on the back in 162 healthy subjects. Sensory profiles for standard test sites were within normal interlaboratory differences. QST revealed lower sensitivity on the upper back than the hand, and higher sensitivity on the lower back than the foot, but no systematic differences between these trunk sites. Age effects were significant for most parameters. Females exhibited lower pressure pain thresholds (PPT) than males, which was the only significant gender difference. Values outside the 95% confidence interval of healthy subjects (considered abnormal) required temperature changes of >3.3–8.2 °C for thermal detection. For cold pain thresholds, confidence intervals extended mostly beyond safety cutoffs, hence only relative reference data (left-right differences, hand-trunk differences) were sufficiently sensitive. For mechanical detection and pain thresholds, left-right differences were 1.5–2.3 times more sensitive than absolute reference data. The most sensitive parameter was PPT, where already side-to-side differences >35% were abnormal. Compared to trunk reference data, patients with postherpetic neuralgia exhibited thermal and tactile deficits and dynamic mechanical allodynia, mostly without reduced mechanical pain thresholds. This pattern deviates from other types of neuropathic pain. QST reference data for the trunk will also be useful for patients with postthoracotomy pain or chronic back pain.     

Test-Retest and Inter-Examiner Reliability of a Novel Bedside Quantitative Sensory Testing Battery in Postherpetic Neuralgia Patients

In health and disease, the somatosensory system has been interrogated with standardized research techniques, collectively referred to as quantitative sensory testing (QST). In neuropathic pain, QST has been used to characterize multiple sensory derangements. However, the use of QST outside the lab has been limited by several factors, including a lack of standardization, variability in procedural technique, and duration of testing that would be unacceptable for clinic. To address these shortcomings, the Neuropathic Pain Research Consortium designed an easy and low-cost “bedside” QST procedure. To test the hypothesis that this procedure would be clinically reliable over time and across different examiners, a multisite, blinded study was performed in subjects with postherpetic neuralgia. Generally, agreement between 2 examiners and over 2 study visits with 1 examiner was high. Additionally, intraclass correlation coefficients and Kappa statistics calculated showed that the battery of QST tests included were highly reliable. Interestingly, mechanical modalities (light brush, pinprick, pressure, and vibration) showed the highest reliability. The least reliable modalities were cool (room temperature) and warmth (38°C). These data demonstrate that the Neuropathic Pain Research Consortium beside QST protocol is reliable across examiner and over time, providing a validated QST tool for use in clinical practice and clinical trials.PerspectiveThis blinded, multicenter trial in 32 patients with postherpetic neuralgia demonstrates bedside QST is reliable and suitable as a clinical trial outcome. The novel bedside battery could be used in clinical trials or in clinical practice over time given the reliability data presented in this article.     

Classifying post‐stroke shoulder pain: Can the DN4 be helpful?

The etiology of post‐stroke shoulder pain (PSSP) is largely unclear and may involve both nociceptive and neuropathic mechanisms. No gold standard is present for PSSP diagnosis. The neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4), was originally developed to identify neuropathic pain in the clinical context. In this study we used the DN4 to categorize PSSP patients and compared symptoms and signs suggestive of either nociceptive or neuropathic pain. Pain complaints and sensory functions were compared between patients with chronic PSSP scoring at least four (DN4+, n=9) or less than four (DN4⁻, n=10) on the DN4. Pain was assessed using a numeric rating scale and the McGill pain questionnaire. Sensory functions were assessed using clinical examination and quantitative sensory testing combined with a cold pressor test. Patients classified as DN4+ reported constant pain, higher pain intensity, a higher impact of pain on daily living, more frequent loss of cold sensation, reduced QST thresholds at the unaffected side and increased QST thresholds at the affected side. Notably, several symptoms and signs suggestive of either neuropathic or nociceptive pain corresponded to the subgroups DN4+ and DN4⁻ respectively. However, since the pathophysiological mechanisms remain unclear and none of the sensory signs could be exclusively related to either DN4+ or DN4⁻, PSSP prognosis and treatment should not be solely based on the DN4. Nonetheless, a thorough assessment of neuropathic and nociceptive pain complaints and somatosensory functions should be included in the diagnostic work‐up of PSSP.     

Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Somatosensory abnormalities in 1236 patients with different neuropathic pain syndromes

Neuropathic pain is accompanied by both positive and negative sensory signs. To explore the spectrum of sensory abnormalities, 1236 patients with a clinical diagnosis of neuropathic pain were assessed by quantitative sensory testing (QST) following the protocol of DFNS (German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain), using both thermal and mechanical nociceptive as well as non-nociceptive stimuli.