GSTT1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk in Asians: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) enzymes are involved in conjugation of electrophilic compounds to glutathione, and glutathione S-transferase T 1 (GSTT1) and glutathione S-transferase M 1 (GSTM1) polymorphisms have been implicated as risk factors for prostate cancer. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to define the effect of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes on prostate cancer risk in Asians. We searched the PubMed and Wanfang Medical databases to identify published case–control studies investigating the associations of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes with risk of prostate cancer in Asians. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q statistic and odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) from individual studies were pooled using fixed or random effects models according to the heterogeneity. There were 18 studies (2,046 cases, 2,876 controls) on GSTM1 polymorphism, 15 studies (1,677 cases, 2,431 controls) on GSTT1 polymorphism, and 6 studies (675 cases, 853 controls) on GSTM1/GSTT1 interaction analysis. Overall, GSTM1 null genotype was significantly associated with increased risk of prostate cancer in Asians (random effects OR 1.80, 95 % CI 1.48–2.18, P?<?0.001), and GSTT1 null genotype was also significantly associated with increased risk of prostate cancer in Asians (random effects OR 1.40, 95 % CI 1.10–1.80, P?<?0.001). In addition, the GSTM1/GSTT dual null genotype was associated with higher risk of prostate cancer in Asians (random effects OR 2.14, 95 % CI 1.59–2.89, P?=?0.007). In conclusion, GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes are associated with increased risk of prostate cancer in Asians, and GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes are risk factors for the development of prostate cancer.     

Genetic Deletions of GSTM1 and GSTT1 in Head and Neck Cancer: Review of the Literature from 2000 to 2012

Head and neck cancer is one of the leading causes of deaths worldwide. Two genes GSTM1 and GSTT1 involvedin phase II of carcinogen detoxification have been frequently studied in the literature. Their null genotypes arethought to be associated with increased head and neck cancer risk. However, the published reviews are not upto date and many important papers have been skipped. The current literature review was restricted to the nullgenotypes of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes with special emphasis on the genotypic status. We found that thesize of study sample varied greatly and the oral cavity cancer was more influenced by GSTM1 and GSTT1 genedeletions. With respect to ethnicity Asians are more prone to head and neck cancers with these null genotypes ascompared to Europeans and Americans. The current review showed significant associations (OR=9.0, 95%CI;1.4-9.5; OR=3.7, 95%CI; 1.4-9.5) of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes with head and neck cancers. Reviewconfirms the data of previous reviews that GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms may be risk factors forcancer initiation.     

The GSTT1 null genotype contributes to increased risk of prostate cancer in Asians: a meta-analysis

Background: Many studies have investigated the association between glutathione S-transferase T 1 (GSTT1)null genotype and risk of prostate cancer, but the impact of GSTT1 null genotype in Asians is still unclear owingto inconsistencies across results. Thie present meta-analysis aimed to quantify the strength of the associationbetween GSTT1 null genotype and risk of prostate cancer. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase andWangfang databases for studies of associations between the GSTT1 null genotype and risk of prostate cancer inAsians and estimated summary odds ratio (OR) with their 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: A totalof 11 case-control studies with 3,118 subjects were included in this meta-analysis, which showed the GSTT1null genotype to be significantly associated with increased risk of prostate cancer in Asians (random-effects OR= 1.49, 95% CI 1.15-1.92, P = 0.002), also after adjustment for heterogeneity (fixed-effects OR = 1.45, 95% CI1.23-1.70, P < 0.001). No evidence of publication bias was observed. Conclusions: This meta-analysis of availabledata suggested the GSTT1 null genotype does contribute to increased risk of prostate cancer in Asians.     

Association of glutathione S-transferase T1 and M1 polymorphisms with prostate cancer susceptibility in populations of Asian descent: a meta-analysis

Background

Genetic polymorphism was hypothesized to be reason of variation in prostate cancer incidence among different racial group. Based on that published data on the association of prostate cancer susceptibility with polymorphisms in genes encoding Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) were inconclusive, the aim of this study was to more precisely address the role of GSTs polymorphisms (especially, GSTT1 and GSTM1 deletions) on prostate cancer risk in Asian descent.

Methods

A meta-analysis including 8 articles with 711 cases and 1122 controls for GSTT1 and 1098 cases and 1588 controls for GSTM1 was performed.

Results

Significantly increased prostate cancer risk was found among subjects carrying GSTM1 null genotype (odds ratio (OR) = 1.403; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.088 – 1.808) but not among subjects carrying GSTT1 deletion genotype (OR = 0.959; 95%CI = 0.709 – 1.297). When stratified by country, the null genotype of GSTT1 neither increased nor decreased prostate cancer risk significantly in China (OR = 1.355; 95%CI = 0.895 – 2.049), Japan (OR = 0.812; 95%CI = 0.545 – 1.211), and Korea (OR = 1.056; 95%CI = 0.727 – 1.534). While significant association of elevated prostate cancer risk with GSTM1 deletion were found in China (OR = 1.665; 95%CI = 1.324 – .094) and Korea (OR = 1.914; 95%CI = 1.311 – 2.793) but not in Japan (OR = 0.980; 95%CI = 0.726 – 1.321).

Conclusion

In summary, this meta-analysis suggested that the null genotype of GSTM1 rather than GSTT1 may be involved in the etiology of prostate cancer in Asian population.     

Polymorphisms in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon metabolism and conjugation genes, interactions with smoking and prostate cancer risk.

The relationship between cigarette smoking and prostate cancer remains unclear. Any potential association may depend on the individuals' ability to metabolize and detoxify cigarette carcinogens--such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. To investigate this, we studied the association between prostate cancer and smoking, as well as the main and modifying effects of functional polymorphisms in genes that metabolize polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (CYP1A1 Ile(462)Val, microsomal epoxide hydrolase His(139)Arg) and detoxify reactive derivatives (GSTM1 null deletion, GSTT1 null deletion, GSTP1 Ile(105)Val and Ala(114)Val) using a family-based case-control design (439 prostate cancer cases and 479 brother controls). Within the entire study population, there were no main effects for smoking or any of the polymorphisms. However, the nondeleted GSTM1 allele was inversely associated with prostate cancer [odds ratio (OR), 0.50; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.26-0.94] among men with less aggressive disease (Gleason score < 7 and clinical tumor stage < T2c) and positively associated (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.01-2.79) with prostate cancer in men with more aggressive disease (Gleason score > or = 7 or clinical tumor stage > or = T2c). We also found a statistically significant negative multiplicative interaction between the GSTM1 nondeleted allele and heavy smoking (> 20 pack-years) in the total study population (P = 0.01) and in Caucasians (P = 0.01). Among Caucasians, heavy smoking increased prostate cancer risk nearly 2-fold in those with the GSTM1 null genotype (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.99-3.05) but this increased risk was not observed in heavy smokers who carried the GSTM1 nondeleted allele (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.53-1.71). Our results highlight the importance of considering genetic modifiers of carcinogens when evaluating smoking in prostate cancer.     

Genetic polymorphisms in GSTM1, GSTP1, and GSTT1 and the risk for breast cancer: results from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: We studied the relation of breast cancer to common deletion mutations in GSTM1 and GSTT1 and the functional Ile(105)Val polymorphism in GSTP1 in a large, population-based case-control study conducted in China and performed a meta-analysis to summarize the literature. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In the case-control study, a total of 1144 breast cancer cases and 1221 community controls were genotyped for GSTM1, GSTP1, and GSTT1 using PCR-based methods. Associations of genotypes and breast cancer were evaluated in logistic regression models. Meta-analysis odds ratios (ORs) were estimated using a fixed effects model. RESULTS: In the case-control study, associations were null for GSTM1 [age-adjusted OR 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-1.14] and GSTT1 (OR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.83-1.15). A significant increase in risk was observed among homozygotes for the variant Ile(105)Val polymorphism (OR 1.92, 95% CI: 1.21-3.04). No combined effects of GSTM1, GSTP1, and GSTT1 genotypes or interactions with potential effect modifiers were detected. All results were similar in pre- and postmenopausal women and for early versus advanced stage breast cancer. The meta-analysis, based predominantly on Caucasian women, supported null results for the homozygous deletion variant in GSTM1 (summary OR 1.05; combining 19 studies) and GSTT1 (summary OR 1.11; 15 studies). Meta-analysis results for the homozygous GSTP1 variant indicated no overall association (summary OR 1.04; 10 studies), although results varied significantly across studies (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: This large case-control study provides strong support for earlier studies showing no overall association of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletion polymorphisms with breast cancer risk. The GSTP1 variant may be relevant to breast cancer risk in Asian populations.     

GSTM1 and GSTT1 Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Prostate Cancer: A Case-Control Study of the Algerian Population

Objective: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major public health problem worldwide, with high morbidity and mortality levels. Advanced age, androgen stimulation, and ethnicity have been reported to be possible risk factors. It has been suggested that particular genetic polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferases (GST), xenobiotic-metabolising enzymes, could predispose to prostate cancer through heritable deficiency in detoxification of environmental carcinogens. Conflicts in the published results and the absence of similar in depth studies in Algeria prompted us to perform the present case-control study of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms and their possible association with PCa in an Algerian population. Methods: We determined GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes for 49 histologically verified prostate cancer patients and in 41 age-matched healthy controls by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using peripheral blood DNA samples. Result: While an association between the GSTM1 null genotype and PCa risk (OR= 3.69, 95% CI= 1.30-10.44; P = 0.01) was evident, the GSTT1 null genotype (OR= 0.92, 95% IC= 0.32-2.62; P = 0.49) appeared without influence. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences between the double null genotype and PCa is detected, also no statistically significant differences between smoking status and PCa is detected. Conclusion: The GSTM1 null genotype may increase individual susceptibility to prostate cancer. On the other hand, the null-activity genotype of GSTT1 did not appear to contribute to the risk of prostate cancer in our population.     

GSTM1 and GSTT1 Polymorphisms, Cigarette Smoking, and Risk of Colon Cancer: A Population-based Case-control Study in North Carolina (United States)

Cigarette smoke is a risk factor for colon cancer, but the importance of dose and interaction with genetic susceptibility remain poorly understood. We used data from a population-based case control study, to examine the association between cigarette smoking and colon cancer in African Americans and whites, and colon cancer and polymorphisms in GSTM1 and GSTT1. A total of 554 cases of primary colon cancer and 874 controls were included in this analysis. We found no association between cigarette smoking (ever versus never) and colon cancer in African Americans (odds ratio (OR)=0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.65–1.33). In contrast, there was an increased risk of cigarette smoking in whites (OR=1.43, CI=1.05–1.94). There was a small increased risk of colon cancer for individuals with GSTM1 null (African Americans, OR=1.43, CI, 0.98–2.09; whites, OR=1.19, CI, 0.90–1.58) and a decreased risk of colon cancer for individuals with GSTT1 null (African Americans, OR=0.59, CI: 0.40–0.86; whites, OR=0.72, CI: 0.53–1.00). There were weak interactions between GSTT1 null and cigarette smoking in whites, and GSTM1 null genotype and cigarette smoking in African Americans. GSTT1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms may be weakly related to colon cancer risk and there may be racial differences in gene-smoking interactions.     

Glutathione-S-transferase (GSTM1, GSTT1) Null Phenotypes and Risk of Lung Cancer in a Korean Population

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate any association of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes withthe risk of lung cancer in a South Korean population. Methods: We conducted a large-scale, population-basedcase-control study including 3,933 lung cancer cases and 1,699 controls. Genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 weredetermined using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results: In logistic regression analysis adjusted for age andsmoking, we did not find any association between GSTM1 or GSTT1 and LC risk in women. However, in men,the GSTM1 and GSTTI null genotypes were borderline associated with risk (OR=1.18, 95% CI=0.99-1.41 forGSTM1, OR=1.18, 95% CI=0.99-1.41 for GSTT1), and combined GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes conferredan increased risk for LC in men (OR=1.39, 95% CI=1.08–1.78). The OR for the GSTT1 null genotype was greaterin subjects aged 55 years old or younger (OR=1.45, 95% CI=1.09-1.92 for men; OR=1.36, 95% CI=0.97–1.90for women), than in those over age 55 (OR=1.03, 95% CI=0.83-1.27 for men; OR=0.86, 95% CI=0.66–1.12 forwomen) in both genders (p for interaction <0.05). Conclusions: In the Korean population, the GSTM1 andGSTT1 null genotypes are risk factors for LC in men; the GSTT1 null genotype has a more prominent effecton LC risk in younger people (age 55 years and under) than in older individuals.     

A systematic approach to analysing gene-gene interactions: polymorphisms at the microsomal epoxide hydrolase EPHX and glutathione S-transferase GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 loci and breast cancer risk.

OBJECTIVE: We undertook a case-control study in an Australian Caucasian population-based sample of 1,246 cases and 664 controls to assess the roles of detoxification gene polymorphisms EPHX T>C Tyr(113)His, GSTT1 deletion, GSTM1 deletion, and GSTP1 A>G Ile(105)Val on risk of breast cancer. METHODS: We systematically addressed the main effects and possible gene-gene interactions using unconditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) adjusted for potential confounders and using standard model building approaches based on likelihood theory. RESULTS: There was a decreased risk associated with the EPHX CC genotype [OR, 0.60; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.43-0.84; P = 0.003], marginally significant evidence of increased risk with GSTM1 null genotype (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00-1.47; P = 0.05), but no association with GSTT1 null genotype (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.86-1.45; P = 0.4) or GSTP1 (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.82-1.10; P = 0.5) genotype. The full model with all interactions gave a significantly better fit than a main-effects-only model (P < 0.001), providing evidence for gene-gene interactions. The most parsimonious model included main effects for EPHX, GSTT1, and GSTM1; a two-way interaction between EPHX and GSTM1; and a three-way interaction between EPHX, GSTM1, and GSTT1. Predicted risks were greatest for women carrying deletions of both GSTT1 and GSTM1, with either the EPHX TC genotype (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.19-3.45; P = 0.009) or EPHX CC genotype (OR, 3.54; 95% CI, 1.29-9.72; P = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Detoxification gene polymorphisms may interact with each other to result in small groups of individuals at modestly increased risk. We caution against overinterpretation and suggest that pooling of similarly large studies is needed to clarify the possible role of such complex gene-gene interactions on breast cancer risk. 2007;16(4):769-74).     

GSTM1 and GSTT1 Genetic Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer Risk in Selected Filipino Cases

Background: The association of genetic polymorphisms with cancer development has been shown to be race- andtumor site-specific. Thus, this study aimed to determine whether polymorphisms in the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genesare associated with breast cancer among selected Filipinos. Methods: A total of 136 histologically confirmed breastcancer cases were age- and sex-matched with 136 clinically healthy controls. Genomic DNA extracted from bloodsamples of participants were screened for GSTM1 and GSTT1 genetic polymorphisms by multiplex PCR. Results:The frequency of null genotypes among the cases (GSTM1: n=78; 57.4%; GSTT1: n=61; 44.9%) was not significantlydifferent (p>0.05) from the controls (GSTM1: n=93; 68.4%; GSTT1: n=59; 43.4%). It was also demonstrated that riskfor breast cancer was increased in passive smokers carrying the GSTM1 null (OR=2.56; 95% CI=1.38-4.75) or GSTT1positive (OR=2.00; 95% CI=1.05-3.83) genotypes. Moreover, risk was decreased in alcohol users carrying the GSTT1null (OR=0.39; 95% CI=0.16-0.97) genotype. Conclusion: This study suggests that variants of GSTM1 and GSTT1may not be risk factors for breast cancer development among Filipinos. However, the risk may be increased when thesegenotypes were combined with lifestyle or environmental factors.     

Prognostic potential of glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 null genotypes for gastric cancer progression

To improve understanding of glutathione S-transferase (GST) behavior in terms of a development and prognostic factor for gastric adenocarcinoma, we investigated the association between the GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes and gastric cancer risk or the prognostic value of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes was evaluated. Using a polymerase chain reaction-based method, the frequencies of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes and prognostic factors, such as staging, differentiation, and histologic type (intestinal vs. diffuse), were evaluated in 80 patients with curatively resected primary gastric adenocarcinoma. The frequencies of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null individuals were higher in the gastric cancer group, but the differences were not statistically significant (for GSTM1 null odds ratio (OR)=0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.49-1.51 and for GSTT1, OR=0.97; 95% CI=0.55-1.71). Since the GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes are potential indicators of gastric adenocarcinoma, we examined the relationship between the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotypes and prognostic factors. In terms of the histologically diffuse type of cancer, GSTM1 indicated an approximately 3.24-fold increase (OR=3.24; 95% CI=1.05-10.17). With respect to gastric cancer differentiation, the frequency of the GSTM1 null genotype was linked with a statistically significant increase in risk (3.42-fold) for the high-grade type (OR=3.42; CI=1.02-13.24). Our results indicate that there is no obvious relationship between GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms and the development of gastric cancer. However, in Korean gastric adenocarcinoma patients the GSTM1 null genotype appears to be associated with a poorer prognosis.     

Interaction of glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 genotypes and malignant melanoma.

The mu and theta classes of glutathione S-transferases (GST) may affect the development of cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) by decreasing cellular oxidative stress in skin. These isozymes are absent in a large proportion of the population because of germ-line homozygous deletions in the genes encoding GSTM1 and GSTT1. To determine the association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 homozygous deletions (GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null, respectively) and CMM, we studied 212 patients with CMM, 150 patients with CMM and dysplastic nevi (DN), 147 patients with DN alone, and 124 healthy persons without CMM or DN. Comparing CMM cases (n = 362) to participants without CMM (n = 271), we found no association with GSTM1 null [odds ratio (OR), 1.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.86-1.6] or GSTT1 null (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.56-1.2), either independently or in combination (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.81-2.2), after adjusting for age. However, among the subset of participants with red or blond hair, those with CMM were twice as likely to carry GSTM1 null (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4.2) and nearly 10-fold more likely to carry both GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null (OR, 9.5; 95% CI, 1.2-73) compared with those without CMM. These data suggest that among persons with hair colors traditionally associated with increased risk for melanoma, absence of both GSTM1 and GSTT1 may act to further elevate CMM risk.     

Association of GSTT1 gene polymorphisms with the risk of prostate cancer: an updating meta-analysis

It has been demonstrated that the glutathione S-transferase (GST) superfamily helps remove carcinogens from the body and thus might be associated with prostate cancer risk. In recent years, GSTT1 polymorphism has been extensively studied as a potential prostate cancer risk factor; however, the results are inconsistent. To investigate the association between GSTT1 and prostate cancer, we conducted a meta-analysis of 33 studies with 6,697 prostate patients and 7,643 controls. For GSTM1 null versus present genotype, the random effects odds ratio was 0.98 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.83–1.16) based on a wide population. Subgroup analyses in the different ethnic groups and different controls were performed. The OR was 1.01 (95 % CI 0.86–1.19) in Caucasians, 1.01 (95 % CI 0.70–1.47) in Asians, and 0.77 (95 % CI 0.42–1.42) in Africans. The OR was 0.98 (95 % CI 0.82–1.16) in non-benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) controls and 1.09 (95 % CI 0.66–1.79) in BPH controls. In conclusion, our present meta-analysis demonstrates that there is no association between GSTT1 polymorphism and prostate cancer, even in the sub-analysis concerning different races and control sources. The direction of further research should focus not only on the simple relationship of GSTT1 and prostate cancer but also on gene–environment interaction and distinctions of different GSTs.     

Glulathione-S-transferases Gene Polymorphism in Prediction of Gastric Cancer Risk by Smoking and Helicobacter Pylori Infection Status

Aim: To evaluate the association of glutathione S-transferases gene polymorphisms with the risk of gastriccancer, with reference to smoking and Helicobacter pylori infection. Methods: We conducted a 1:1 matched casecontrolstudy with 410 gastric cancer cases and 410 cancer-free controls. Polymorphisms of GSTM1, GSTT1 andGSTP1 were determined using PCR-CTPP. Results: The GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes were significantlyassociated with the risk of gastric cancer after adjusting for potential confounding factors (OR=1.68, 95%CI=1.32-2.23 for null GSTM1, OR=1.73; 95% CI=1.24-2.13 for null GSTT1). The combination of null GSTM1and null GSTT1 conferred an elevated risk (OR=2.54, 95% CI=1.55-3.39). However, no association was foundfor GSTP1 polymorphism The smoking modified the association of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes withthe risk of gastric cancer. Conclusion: GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes are associated with increased risk ofgastric cancer, and smoking modifies the association.     

Meta-analysis of the association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms and cervical cancer

Aim: We conducted a meta-analysis to analyze the influence of GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms on cervical cancer risk, and explore gene-environment interactions. Methods: Identification of relevant studies was carried out through a search of Medline and the EMbase up to Oct. 2011. All case-control studies that investigated the association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene polymorphisms and risk of cervical cancer were included. The pooled odds ratio (OR) was used for analyses of results and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Results: A total of 21 case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis of GSTM1 (2,378 cases and 2,639 controls) and GSTT1 (1,229 cases and 1,223 controls) genotypes. The overall results showed that the GSTM1 null was related to an increased risk of cervical cancer (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.21-1.85). Subgroup analysis were performed based on smoking and ethnicity. Our results showed that smokers with null GSTM1 genotype had a moderate increased risk of cervical cancer (OR=1.85, 95% CI=1.07-3.20). For the ethnicity stratification, moderate significantly increased risk of null GSTM1 genotype was found in Chinese (OR=2.12, 95% CI=1.43-3.15) and Indian populations (OR=2.07, 95% CI=1.49-2.88), but no increased risk was noted in others. Conclusion: This meta-analysis provided strong evidence that the GSTM1 genotype is associated with the development of cervical cancer, especially in smokers, and Chinese and Indian populations. However, no association was found for GSTT1 null genotype carriers.     

Association of GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTM3, and GSTP1 Genes Polymorphisms with Susceptibility to Osteosarcoma: a Case- Control Study and Meta-Analysis

Background: Some studies have investigated the association of GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTM3, and GSTP1polymorphisms with susceptibility to osteosarcoma; however, these studies results are inconsistent and inconclusive. Inorder to drive a more precise estimation, the present case-control study and meta-analysis was performed to investigateassociation of GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTM3, and GSTP1 polymorphisms with osteosarcoma. Methods: Eligible articleswere identified by a search of several electronic databases for the period up to May 5, 2018. Odds ratios were pooledusing either fixed-effects or random effects models. Results: Finally, a total of 24 case-control studies with 2,405osteosarcoma cases and 3,293 controls were included in the present meta-analysis. Overall, significantly increasedosteosarcoma risk was found when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis of GSTT1 (Null vs. Present: OR= 1.24795% CI 1.020-1.524, P= 0.031) and GSTP1 polymorphism (B vs. A: OR= 8.899 95% CI 2.722-29.094, P≤0.001). Inthe stratified, significantly increased osteosarcoma risk was observed for GSTT1 polymorphism among Asians (Nullvs. Present: OR= 1.300 95% CI 1.034-1.635, P= 0.025), but not among Caucasians. Conclusions: This meta-analysisdemonstrated that GSTP1 and GSTT1 null genotype are associated with the risk of osteosarcoma. Future large welldesigned epidemiological studies are warranted to validate our results.     

Genetic Polymorphisms of Xenobiotic Metabolizing Genes (GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1), Gene-Gene Interaction with Association to Lung Cancer Risk in North India; A Case Control Study

Aim: In this case control study involving, 220 human subjects; polymorphisms in xenobiotic metabolizing genes (GST-M1, -T1 and -P1) and their association to lung cancer risk is being analysed among smokers and non-smokers. GSTM1 or GSTT1 gene polymorphism and amino acid changes in GSTP1 have been correlated and may be associated to lung cancer risk. Other factor includes exposure to environmental pollutants and life style choices. We have explored gene-gene and gene-environment interaction in the aetiology of lung cancer risk among north Indian population. Patients and Methods: For the study we have collected 120 lung cancer patient blood samples from Kamala Nehru Memorial Cancer Hospital, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh and 100 matched controls. DNA was isolated and GST-M1 and - T1 genotyping were assessed by multiplex PCR whereas the GSTP1 polymorphism was analysed using restriction fragment length polymorphism. The risk of lung carcinogenesis was assessed using logistic regression analysis calculating the odd ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: The risk of lung carcinogenesis was three fold higher for null GSTT1 (OR=3.045, 95%CI=1.750-5.301, p-value <0.001) genotype; whereas other two types; GSTM1 (OR= 1.342, 95% CI=0.788-2.284, p-value=0.270) and GSTP1 (OR=0.806, 95% CI=0.526-1.236, p-value=0.323) showed no association to lung cancer susceptibility respectively. Smokers diagnosed with lung cancer had more null genotypes for GSTT1 (OR=4.773, 95%CI=1.939-11.751, p<0.001). The ‘at risk’ genotype combination GSTM1 (null) /GSTT1 (null) (OR=1.76, 95%CI; 0.920-3.370, p-value=0.03) showed increased susceptibility to lung cancer risk. The genotype combination of GSTT1 (null)/GSTP1 (Ile/Ile) (p=0.009) was associated with increased lung cancer risk. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that; GSTT1 null genotype were more susceptible for lung cancer risk and smoking increases the susceptibility for lung cancer several folds among the North Indian population. Gene-gene interaction for null genotypes of GSTM1 and GSTT1 were correlated with higher risk of having lung cancer.     

Interactions among GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms, cruciferous vegetable intake and breast cancer risk

Isothiocyanates are anticarcinogenic phytochemicals found in cruciferous vegetables that both induce and are substrates for the gluthatione S-transferases (GSTs). The GSTs are phase II metabolizing enzymes involved in metabolism of various bioactive compounds. Functional polymorphisms in GST genes have been identified and may interact with cruciferous vegetable intake to affect cancer risk. We examined this hypothesis using data from the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project, a population-based case-control study conducted in Long Island, NY, from 1996 to 1997. Cruciferous vegetable intake in the previous year was assessed via modified Block food frequency questionnaire. DNA was extracted from blood samples (n = 1052 cases and n = 1098 controls) and genotyped for GSTM1 deletion, GSTT1 deletion and GSTP1 Ile105Val using multiplex polymerase chain reaction and Taqman assays. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We found an 86% increase in the OR for breast cancer among carriers of the GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null and GSTP 105Ile/Ile genotypes (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.12, 3.08) and a 36% decrease in the OR among carriers of GSTM1 present, GSTT1 null and GSTP1 105Ile/Val + Val/Val genotypes (OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.42, 0.97) compared with GSTM1 present, GSTT1 present and GSTP1 105Ile/Ile carriers. We found no joint effects among GST polymorphisms and cruciferous vegetable intake and breast cancer risk. In conclusion, we found associations between specific combinations of three GST gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk but these did not modify the association between cruciferous vegetable intake and breast cancer. Additional studies are needed to confirm the associations observed.     

Null Glutathione S-transferase T1 and M1 Genotypes and Oral Cancer Susceptibility in China and India - a Meta-analysis

Objective: Genetic variation is considered to strongly impact on detoxification of carcinogens and thereforeis related to cancer risk. However, findings for the null genotypes of GSTT1 and GSTM1 have not always beenconsistent. Therefore the present meta-analysis was conducted. Methods: We accessed the reported study atdifferent research areas and used various databases, including PubMed and Wanfang Med Onlion from 1990to May 1st 2013. We calculated the odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI) and P value for oral cancerby using Review Manager 5.1 and STATE 12. Results: We found that there was no increased oral cancer riskamong subjects carrying GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotype (OR=1.35, 95%CI=0.68-2.68, P=0.39) and (OR=1.41,95%CI=0.72-2.77, P=0.31) in the Chinese population. In contrast, in studies in India a significant correlationbetween GSTM1 null genotype and oral cancer was observed (OR=1.59, 95%CI=1.20-2.11, P=0.001), but not inGSTT1 (OR=1.21, 95% CI = 0.84-1.74, P=0.31). Conclusion: We discovered that GSTM1 deletion polymorphismhad a significant effect on the susceptibility of oral cancer in the Indian population.