Artificial nutrition and hydration in terminal cancer patients: the real and the ideal

Introduction To better understand current practice relating to artificial nutrition/hydration in terminal cancer patients, we enrolled terminal cancer patients who were admitted at Seoul National University Boramae Hospital for supportive care only and who died with a duration of hospital stay to death of more than 1 week between 2003 and 2004. We detailed oral intake and intravenous nutrition/hydration status on admission, 1 week after admission, and 2 days before death. Administered calories and changes in these according to time and “DNR” (do-not-resuscitate) status were noted. Results Of the total 165 patients, oral intake was possible in 84 patients (50.9%) on admission, in 79 patients (47.8%) on 1 week after admission, and in 29 patients (17.5%) 2 days before death (p < 0.01). Intravenous nutrition/hydration was administered to 133 patients (80.6%) on admission, to 125 patients (75.7%) at 1 week, and to 137 patients (83.0%) 2 days before death (p = 0.7). The calories administered to the patient by oral intake were 393 kcal on admission, 353 kcal 1 week after admission, and 89 kcal 2 days before death. In addition, the calories delivered by intravenous fluid were 369, 386 and 465 kcal, respectively. Near to death, calories by oral intake continuously reduced (p < 0.01) and intravenous calories continuously increased (p = 0.04), but total administered calories reduced (p = 0.03). Intravenous nutrition/hydration stopped after the attainment of the advance directive of DNR in 9% of patients. Conclusion This study showed the high prevalence of artificial nutrition/hydration, especially intravenous infusion, in Korean terminal cancer patients compared with situation in other countries. More studies are needed to verify the efficacy of artificial nutrition/hydration in terminal cancer patients.     

The ideal state for perioperative nursing

For a typical surgical procedure, a minimum of three individuals document the care provided during the intraoperative phase. This makes it difficult to develop perioperative records with pertinent data elements without creating redundancy, errors, and inconsistencies. This article discusses strategies to develop surgical records that share information effectively through the use of structured vocabulary and a thoughtful approach to professional nursing practice. It begins to explore developing standards for paper or electronic documentation through collaboration with other stakeholders, including anesthesia care providers, surgeons, clinical directors, and informaticians.     

The ideal fetal head circumference calculation

Various formulas have been employed to compute the circumference of an ellipse. These formulas can be separated into three groups: formulas for a circle, formulas for an incorrect ellipse, and a very complicated formula for a correct ellipse. The errors caused by the first two groups are termed systematic because they occur every time that one of these formulas is used. When measuring fetal head circumference, the errors increase as the fetal head is more ellipsoid, becoming more than 1% when the ratio of the biparietal to fronto-occipital diameter decreases to less than .70. Near term, when the fetal head is large, this could create an error in predicting gestational age of almost .8 weeks. The third group is associated with mathematical random errors because of the difficulty in using a cumbersome equation. All of these formulas and their shortcomings are analyzed. A calculation for the correct circumference of an ellipse is proposed using the simple formula for a circle times a correction factor. The correction factor depends solely on the ratio of the biparietal to fronto-occipital diameter. This formula should minimize random errors and eliminate systematic errors in the calculation of fetal head circumference and will permit a more accurate analysis of fetal age.