Effect of raloxifene on bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial

The safety and efficacy of raloxifene, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), has been studied extensively in large, global clinical trials. However, the effect of raloxifene on bone mineral density (BMD) and on biochemical markers of bone turnover in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis has not been rigorously evaluated. This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of raloxifene in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis following 1 year of therapy. Participants in this multicenter trial were randomly assigned to receive placebo, raloxifene 60 mg/day (RLX60), or raloxifene 120 mg/day (RLX120). Lumbar spine BMD was measured at baseline, 24, 40, and 52 weeks, and biochemical markers of bone turnover were assessed at baseline, 12, 24, and 52 weeks. Serum lipids were assessed at baseline, 12, 24, 40, and 52 weeks, and breast examinations and transvaginal ultrasound of the endometrium were performed at enrollment and 52 weeks. Compared with baseline, women taking RLX60 had significant increases in lumbar spine (L2-L4) BMD at 24 weeks (+3.3%, p<0.001) through 52 weeks (+3.5%, p<0.001) of therapy, and similar results were observed in the RLX120 group. Markers of bone turnover and total cholesterol and LDL-C were significantly reduced, and no significant treatment-group difference was observed for patients reporting at least one adverse event following randomization. In addition, there were no reported venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in any treatment group. The results of this study demonstrate that raloxifene is associated with early increases in lumbar spine BMD, has favorable effects on biochemical markers of bone turnover and lipid profile, and is well tolerated in postmenopausal Japanese women.The named authors wrote this article on behalf of the Japan Clinical Trial Research Group.     

Raloxifene Versus Continuous Combined Estrogen/Progestin Therapy: Densitometric and Biochemical Effects in Healthy Postmenopausal Taiwanese Women

We treated 116 healthy postmenopausal women (age 47–66 years, mean 57 years) in Taiwan with either raloxifene (RLX) 60 mg (n= 92) or 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogen plus 5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (CCEP, n= 24) daily for 12 months in a randomized, double-masked, active-controlled fashion. The results showed that both regimens increased bone mineral density (BMD) at hip sites (means: RLX 2.5–4.9%, CCEP 4.6–7.9%, all p<0.005 compared with baseline), and the difference between the two regimens was not significant. The spinal BMD increased significantly in both groups (1.4% with RLX and 6.0% with CCEP, both p<0.01), and more with CCEP (p<0.003). Osteocalcin levels and urinary type I collagen C-telopeptide/creatinine ratios decreased significantly in both regimens, but the decreases were significantly larger with CCEP. Compared with baseline, both RLX and CCEP decreased the total cholesterol (median 4.9% and 8.6% respectively, p<0.001) and LDL-cholesterol (median 11% and 19% respectively, p<0.001), and increased HDL-cholesterol (median 8.6% and 10.7% respectively, p<0.01). Both regimens increased triglyceride levels (median 3.2% and 18.9% respectively, both p<0.05), although to a lesser extent with RLX than with CCEP (p<0.05). Only 3 subjects (3.3%) reported vaginal bleeding in the RLX group, as compared with 31% (7/22) with CCEP (p<0.05). We conclude that in healthy, postmenopausal Taiwanese women, RLX 60 mg given daily has favorable results in BMD, bone turnover and serum lipids, although the dosage we used showed a potency less than that of conventional CCEP. Received: 22 November 2000 / Accepted: 25 June 2001     

Prevention of Early Postmenopausal Bone Loss by Strontium Ranelate: The Randomized, Two-Year, Double-Masked, Dose-Ranging, Placebo-Controlled PREVOS Trial

Early postmenopausal women (n = 160) were randomised to receive placebo or strontium ranelate (SR) 125 mg/day, 500 mg/day or 1 g/day for 2 years (40 participants per group). All participants received calcium 500 mg/day. The primary efficacy parameter was the percent variation in lumbar bone mineral density (BMD), measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Secondary efficacy criteria included hip BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover. At month 24, SR 1 g/day significantly increased lumbar BMD compared with placebo [mean (SD) +5.53% (5.12); p<0.001] for measured values and [mean (SD) +1.41% (5.33%); p<0.05] for values adjusted for bone strontium content. The annual increase for adjusted values was +0.66% compared with −0.5% with placebo, with an overall beneficial effect after 2 years of about 2.4% with SR 1 g/day relative to placebo. There were no other significant between-group differences in adjusted lumbar BMD. Femoral neck and total hip BMD were also significantly increased at month 24 with SR 1 g/day compared with placebo [mean (SD): +2.46% (4.78) and +3.21% (4.68), respectively; both p<0.001)]. SR 1 g/day significantly increased bone alkaline phosphatase at all time points (p<0.05) compared with baseline and between-group analysis showed a significant increase, compared with placebo, at month 18 (p = 0.048). No effect on markers of bone resorption was observed. SR was as well tolerated as placebo. The minimum does at which SR is effective in preventing bone loss in early postmenopausal non-osteoporotic women is therefore 1 g/day. Received: 7 February 2002 / Accepted: 2 July 2002     

Longitudinal Alveolar Bone Loss in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic/Osteopenic Women

The purpose of this 2-year longitudinal clinical study was to investigate alveolar (oral) bone height and density changes in osteoporotic/osteopenic women compared with women with normal lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD). Thirty-eight postmenopausal women completed this study; 21 women had normal BMD of the lumbar spine, while 17 women had osteoporosis or osteopenia of the lumbar spine at baseline. All subjects had a history of periodontitis and participated in 3- to 4-month periodontal maintenance programs. No subjects were current smokers. All patients were within 5 years of menopause at the start of the study. Four vertical bitewing radiographs of posterior sextants were taken at baseline and 2-year visits. Radiographs were examined using computer-assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA) for changes in bone density at the crestal and subcrestal regions of interproximal bone. Changes in alveolar bone height were also measured. Radiographic data were analyzed by the t-test for two independent samples. Osteoporotic/osteopenic women exhibited a higher frequency of alveolar bone height loss (p<0.05) and crestal (p<0.025) and subcrestal (p<0.03) density loss relative to women with normal BMD. Estrogen deficiency was associated with increased frequency of alveolar bone crestal density loss in the osteoporotic/osteopenic women and in the overall study population (p<0.05). These data suggest that osteoporosis/osteopenia and estrogen deficiency are risk factors for alveolar bone density loss in postmenopausal women with a history of periodontitis. Received: 9 April 1998 / Accepted: 18 August 1998     

Association Between Colles’ Fracture and Low Bone Mass: Age-Based Differences in Postmenopausal Women

Colles’ fracture (CF) in postmenopausal women has been linked to low bone mass at the lumbar spine and hip. However, the diverse methodological approaches of previous studies make the results difficult to compare and thus the implications of CF in osteoporosis daily clinical practice are not clear. We explored the association between CF and low bone mineral density (BMD) in an incident case-control study in 58 postmenopausal Spanish women aged 45–80 years with recent CF and in 83 population-based controls of the same age range. The BMD of ultradistal distal forearm, lumbar spine and hip was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and WHO criteria were used to define osteoporosis and osteopenia. BMD was significantly lower in cases for all three areas (p<0.001). Osteoporosis was more prevalent in cases than controls in the wrist (60% vs. 35%, p<0.001), lumbar spine (47% vs. 20%, p<0.005) and hip (19% vs. 6%, p<0.005). After adjusting for age, menopausal status and body mass index, osteoporosis and osteopenia remained significantly associated with CF only in women aged 65 years or less (ultradistal forearm OR 5.7 (95% CI 1.2–27.2), lumbar spine OR 3.9 (95% CI 1.1–14.3)). We conclude that CF in postmenopausal women aged 65 or less may be used as a sentinel finding to identify patients with generalized osteoporosis. Additionally, 70% of all CF patients regardless of their age had low bone mass (T-score<−1SD) in any studied site. Received: 3 December 2001 / Accepted: 22 May 2002     

Identification of Early Postmenopausal Women with No Bone Response to HRT: Results of a Five-Year Clinical Trial

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) prevents postmenopausal bone loss and fractures. However, the occurrence of women with no bone response to HRT has not been widely examined. We identified the densitometric nonresponders to long-term HRT and investigated some characteristics and biochemical variables as possible predictors of densitometric nonresponse in postmenopausal women. The study population was a subsample of the Kuopio Osteoporosis Study (n= 14.220). A total of 464 early postmenopausal women were randomized into four treatment groups: (1) HRT (sequential combination of 2 mg estradiol valerate and 1 mg cyproterone acetate); (2) vitamin D₃; (3) HRT + Vitamin D₃ combined; and (4) placebo. In this study, the data from HRT and placebo groups were analyzed. Lumbar (L2–4) and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) were determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at baseline and after 5 years of treatment. A densitometric nonresponder was defined as a woman whose 5-year BMD change was similar to the mean BMD change (+ 95% CI) of the placebo group or worse. Altogether, 74 women in the HRT group and 104 women in the placebo group complied with the treatment. According to spinal BMD analysis, 11% of the women were classified as densitometric nonresponders; the corresponding proportion for femoral BMD analysis was 26%. Both smoking (p= 0.003) and low body weight (p= 0.028) were significant risk factors for densitometric nonresponse to HRT. After 6 months of treatment the densitometric nonresponders (hip) had a significantly higher mean serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level (p= 0.038) and lower increases in serum estradiol levels (p= 0.006) than the densitometric responders. The mean changes in serum FSH and alkaline phosphatase levels were significantly lower among the densitometric nonresponders (spine) than responders (p= 0.043 and 0.017, respectively). In conclusion, this prospective study shows that especially current smokers and women with low body weight are at increased risk of poor bone response to HRT. Repeated serum FSH, estradiol and alkaline phosphatase measurements during the first months of long-term HRT may be helpful in identifying the women with no bone response to HRT. Received: 29 January 1999 / Accepted: 2 August 1999     

Prevention of Bone Loss with Risedronate in Glucocorticoid-Treated Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

The aim of the study was to assess risedronate’s effect on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis receiving glucocorticoids. We carried out a two center, 2 year, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial with a third year of nontreatment follow-up. We studied 120 women requiring long-term glucocorticoid therapy at >2.5 mg/day prednisolone randomized to treatment with daily placebo; daily 2.5 mg risedronate; or cyclical 15 mg risedronate (2 out of 12 weeks). At 97 weeks, bone mineral density was maintained at the lumbar spine (+1.4%) and trochanter (+0.4%) in the daily 2.5 mg risedronate group, while significant bone loss occurred in the placebo group (–1.6%, p= 0.03; and 4.0%, p<0.005, respectively). At the femoral neck, there was a nonsignificant bone loss in the daily 2.5 mg risedronate group (–1.0%) while in the placebo group bone mass decreased significantly (–3.6%, p<0.001). The difference between placebo and daily 2.5 mg risedronate groups was significant at the lumbar spine (p= 0.009) and trochanter (p= 0.02) but did not reach statistical significance at the femoral neck. Although not significantly different from placebo at the lumbar spine, the overall effect of the cyclical regimen was similar to that of the daily 2.5 mg risedronate regimen. Treatment withdrawal led to bone loss in the risedronate groups that was significant at the lumbar spine. A similar number of patients experienced adverse events (including upper gastrointestinal events) across treatment groups and risedronate was generally well tolerated. Thus risedronate preserves bone mass in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis receiving glucocorticoids while patients receiving a placebo have significant bone loss. Received: 2 June 1999 / Accepted: 29 September 1999     

Comparison of Bone and Total Alkaline Phosphatase and Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women Treated with Alendronate

Alendronate therapy in osteoporotic women decreases bone turnover and increases bone mineral density (BMD). Optimal patient management should include verification that each patient is responding to therapy. Markers of bone turnover and BMD have both been proposed for this purpose. We have investigated changes resulting from alendronate therapy with an enzyme immunoassay for bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and compared it with total alkaline phosphatase (TAP) and BMD of the lumbar spine, hip, and total body. Subjects were drawn from a multicenter randomized, placebo-controlled trial of alendronate in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. BAP and TAP levels were measured at baseline and following 3, 6 and 12 months of therapy with either placebo (n= 180) or alendronate 10 mg/day (n= 134). All subjects also received 500 mg/day supplemental calcium. BMD was measured at baseline and following 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months of therapy. To compare BAP, TAP and BMD at each site for identifying women that experienced a skeletal effect of alendronate, we calculated least significant change (LSC) values from the long-term intraindividual variability in each placebo-treated woman. Median levels of BAP decreased by 34%, 44% and 43% at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively, in alendronate-treated women (p<0.0001 compared with baseline and with placebo). These changes were significantly greater (p<0.0001) than changes observed for TAP. Following 6 months of alendronate therapy, 90% of the women had experienced a decrease in BAP exceeding the LSC compared with only 71% for TAP. The greatest number of women similarly identified with BMD at any site (i.e. a gain in BMD exceeding the LSC) was 81% for spinal BMD at 36 months. All other sites were less than 70% at 36 months. Short-term changes in BAP and TAP were modestly associated with subsequent changes in BMD at all sites (Spearman’s rho −0.22 to −0.52, p<0.05). Compared with TAP and BMD, BAP testing rapidly and sensitively identified skeletal effects of alendronate thus enabling appropriate drug monitoring of osteoporotic women. Though BAP and TAP changes were modestly predictive of BMD changes, the value of the bone marker tests is their ability to detect rapidly a skeletal effect of therapy. Received: 19 May 2000 / Accepted: 31 October 2000     

Intermittent Oral Disodium Pamidronate in Established Osteoporosis: A 2 Year Double-Masked Placebo-Controlled Study of Efficacy and Safety

The effect of oral pamidronate on bone mineral density and its adverse effect profile was investigated by a double-masked placebo-controlled study of 122 patients aged 55–75 years with established vertebral osteoporosis. Patients on active therapy received disodium pamidronate 300 mg/day (group A) for 4 weeks every 16 weeks, 150 mg/day (group B) for 4 weeks every 8 weeks or placebo (group C). All patients additionally received 500 mg of calcium and 400 IU vitamin D daily. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of the spine, hip, forearm and total body were performed at baseline and 6-monthly for 2 years using a Hologic QDR 1000 device at two sites. Serum osteocalcin and urinary deoxypyridinoline were measured at the above visits and at 3 months. The percentage change (SEM) in spine bone mineral density (BMD) at 2 years based on intention-to-treat analysis was 4.64 (1.01) in group A, 6.10 (0.87) in group B and 1.13 (1.32) in group C. Analysis of variance showed significant increases in group A and B compared with placebo (p<0.01). There were also significant rises in femoral neck BMD for group A (p = 0.005), trochanter BMD for groups A and B (p<0.01) and total-body BMD for groups A and B (p<0.001). There was a significant reduction in serum osteocalcin and urinary deoxypyridinoline for groups A and B (p<0.01). There was an excess of gastrointestinal side-effects in the treated groups, particularly group A. We conclude that intermittent pamidronate therapy can prevent bone loss at both the lumbar spine and femoral neck in patients with established vertebral osteoporosis, although due to gastrointestinal side-effects the 300 mg dose in particular does not appear suitable for clinical usage. Received: 12 January 1999 / Accepted: 30 August 1999     

Effect of raloxifene combined with monofluorophosphate as compared with monofluorophosphate alone in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized,controlled trial

Raloxifene effectively reduces the incidence of vertebral fractures in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Recent data suggest that low-dose monofluorophosphate (MFP) plus calcium reduces the vertebral fracture rate in postmenopausal women with moderate osteoporosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the combination of raloxifene and MFP in the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteopenia, osteoporosis and severe osteoporosis. A total of 596 postmenopausal women with osteopenia, osteoporosis and severe osteoporosis (mean femoral neck T-score of –2.87 SD) were randomized to treatment with 60 mg/day raloxifene HCl and 20 mg/day fluoride ions (as MFP) or 20 mg/day fluoride and placebo for 18 months. All patients received calcium (1000 mg/day) and vitamin D (500 IU/day) supplements. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD), as primary endpoint, and the rate of osteoporotic fractures and biochemical markers, as secondary endpoints, were assessed. As compared with MFP, raloxifene plus MFP was associated with significantly greater mean increases in the BMD of the femoral neck (1.37% versus 0.33%; P=0.004), total hip (0.89% versus –0.42%; P<0.001) and lumbar spine (8.80% versus 5.47% P<0.001). In the raloxifene plus MFP group, 16 patients sustained 17 osteoporotic fractures, as compared with 22 patients sustaining 34 incident osteoporotic fractures in the MFP group (P=0.313). One patient in the raloxifene plus MFP group sustained multiple osteoporotic fractures, as compared with eight patients in the MFP group (P=0.020). MFP alone significantly increased the serum bone alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP) and the urinary C-terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I collagene (U-CTX). The addition of raloxifene in the combination arm blunted the rise in bone ALP, which remained nevertheless significant, and abolished the increase in U-CTX. The combination of raloxifene with MFP was generally well tolerated. This study demonstrates that, in postmenopausal women with osteopenia, osteoporosis and severe osteoporosis, the combination therapy of raloxifene plus MFP favorably influences the BMD and the bone formation and resorption balance, and may reduce the risk of multiple osteoporotic fractures compared to MFP alone.     

Prevention of Bone Loss by Clodronate in Early Postmenopausal Women with Vertebral Osteopenia: A Dose-Finding Study

This double-masked, placebo-controlled study was undertaken to determine the efficacy and safety of oral clodronate in the prevention of bone loss in early postmenopausal women with vertebral osteopenia. Altogether 610 women with a mean age of 53 years were recruited for the study. They were 1–5 years postmenopausal and their lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was at least 1 standard deviation below the mean of premenopausal women (T-score ≤−1). The subjects were randomized into five study groups to receive either placebo, clodronate 65 mg, 400 mg or 800 mg daily, or intermittent clodronate in 3 month cycles with 400 mg daily for 15 days followed with no treatment for 75 days for 3 years. One hundred and eighty-seven of 509 women who completed the primary study continued in the extension study of 2 years in which previous placebo users were switched to clodronate 800 mg daily, while previous users of 400 mg or 800 mg of clodronate used either placebo or 800 mg of clodronate daily. In the primary study clodronate was administered in the evening, and in the extension 1 h before breakfast on an empty stomach. In the primary study mean changes in lumbar spine BMD were −3.4% in the placebo group and +0.4% in 800 mg clodronate group [difference between groups at 3 years 3.8% (95% CI 2.7% to 4.9%, p<0.0001)], and in the trochanter area BMD −1.1% in the placebo group, and + 0.4% in the 800 mg clodronate group [difference between groups at 3 years 1.5% (95% CI 0.05% to 2.9%)]. During the extension study mean changes in lumbar spine BMD were +1.5% in the clodronate group and −0.2 % in the placebo group [difference between groups 1.7% (CI 0.4% to 3.0%, p = 0.010)] and in trochanter BMD were +2.5% in the clodronate group and no change in the placebo group [difference between groups 2.1% (CI 0.3% to 3.9%, p = 0.007)]. No statistically significant differences between the placebo and 800 mg clodronate groups were found in the femoral neck BMD. In the primary study the urinary excretion of type I collagen aminoterminal telopeptide (NTX) decreased by 44% (p<0.0001 compared with placebo) and that of deoxypyridinoline by 18% (p<0.0001) in the clodronate 800 mg group. In the extension study urinary NTX decreased by 51% (p<0.0001) in those who were switched to 800 mg of clodronate and increased by 67% (p<0.0001) in those who stopped using that dose. There was no difference in the frequency of gastrointestinal complaints between clodronate- and placebo-treated patients in the primary study, but they were more common among women who received clodronate in the extension phase. Clodronate in daily doses of 400–800 mg caused a slight elevation of aminotransferase levels, usually within the reference range. In bone biopsies no defect in mineralization was found. In conclusion, clodronate in a daily dose of 800 mg prevents early postmenopausal bone loss at the sites of the skeleton in which cancellous bone predominates. It effectively reduces bone resorption and bone turnover rate. Antifracture efficacy of clodronate remains to be established by prospective, placebo-controlled trials. Received: 4 March 2002 / Accepted: 9 July 2002     

The Prevention of Osteoporosis Using Sequential Low-Dose Hormone Replacement Therapy with Estradiol-17β and Dydrogesterone

Low-dose hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women may produce fewer side-effects but its efficacy in the prevention of bone loss and osteoporosis is not established. To address this we compared the effect of 1 mg estradiol-17β with a 2 mg dose, in combination with cyclical dydrogesterone, in the prevention of postmenopausal bone loss. We conducted a multicenter double-masked prospective randomized, placebo-controlled study in 595 apparently healthy postmenopausal women randomized to either placebo, or continuous oral estradiol-17β 1 mg or 2 mg with sequential dydrogesterone for 2 years. The primary endpoint was the percentage change from baseline in bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) of actively treated groups compared with placebo. Women taking either 1 mg or 2 mg estradiol-17β showed a significant increase in BMD of the LS (mean ± SD, 5.2 ± 3.8% and 6.7 ± 4.0% respectively, both p <0.001) whilst BMD in the placebo group decreased (–1.9 ± 4.0%). Increases were also observed in FN BMD in both treated groups (2.7 ± 4.2% and 2.5 ± 5.2% respectively, both p <0.001) in contrast to the placebo group (–1.8 ± 4.8%). The oldest women showed the greatest treatment response. One milligram estradiol-17β in combination with dydrogesterone is effective in conserving LS and proximal femur bone mass, both of which are clinically important sites of osteoporotic fracture, and is as effective as 2 mg in preventing FN bone. The lower dose of estradiol-17β is a particularly suitable treatment for osteoporosis management in older women since it should minimize side-effects and improve the acceptability of HRT. Received: 19 June 2000 / Accepted: 26 October 2000     

Effects of Alendronate on Bone Density in Men with Primary and Secondary Osteoporosis

Alendronate has been reported to increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce fracture risk in women with osteoporosis. As there are no proven safe and effective treatments available for men with osteoporosis, we compared the effects of alendronate (10 mg/day) on BMD, measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in a 12-month prospective, controlled, open label study involving (i) men with primary (n= 23) or secondary osteoporosis (n= 18), (ii) postmenopausal women with primary (n= 18) or secondary (n= 21) osteoporosis, and (iii) 29 male and 14 female untreated controls matched by age, height and weight. The patients had one or more vertebral fractures and ranged in age from 34.6 to 85.1 years. BMD was detectably increased relative to baseline by 6 months, and increased by comparable amounts in males and females with primary or secondary osteoporosis. At 12 months, lumbar spine BMD was 5.4%± 1.1% to 7.0%± 2.2% higher in the treated groups compared with baseline and controls (p<0.05 to 0.0001). Trochanteric BMD increased by 2.6%± 1.5% and 3.7%± 1.7% in treated men with primary and secondary osteoporosis, respectively (p = 0.06 to 0.08), and by 3.9%± 1.3% in treated women with primary osteoporosis (p<0.01) after 12 months. No significant changes were detected at the femoral neck or Ward’s triangle. BMD remained unchanged in controls. We infer that alendronate has comparable incremental effects on BMD in men and women with primary and secondary osteoporosis within 12 months of treatment. The changes are in the order of 0.5 SD – effects associated with a clinically worthwhile reduction in fracture risk. The data provide room for optimism regarding the role of alendronate in the treatment of osteoporosis in men. Randomized, double-masked and placebo-controlled trials are needed to confirm these preliminary findings and demonstrate antifracture efficacy using vertebral and nonvertebral fracture rates as the primary endpoint. Received: 23 February 1999 / Accepted: 2 June 1999     

Response to Alendronate in Osteoporosis after Previous Treatment with Etidronate

Bisphosphonates such as etidronate and alendronate are widely accepted as effective agents for the treatment of osteoporosis. However, some physicians find the choice of which one to use in different patients, and the comparative magnitude of response, unclear. Fifty postmenopausal women with osteoporosis [group 1: 27 women who had received 3 years of previous cyclical etidronate treatment, mean age 70.5 years, bone mineral density (BMD) mean T-score lumbar spine (LS) −3.58 and femoral neck (FN) −2.51; group 2: 23 women who had not previously received cyclical etidronate treatment, mean age 73.7 years, BMD mean T-score LS −3.65 and FN −2.96] were treated with 10 mg alendronate daily, to determine whether pretreatment with etidronate affected the response to alendronate, and whether patients who did not respond to etidronate, responded to alendronate. There was a significant increase in LS BMD after 2 years of treatment with alendronate compared with baseline (group 1: 7.84%, p<0.001; group 2: 6.69%, p<0.001), but there was no statistical difference between the groups. In the group 1 patients there was a significant difference between the initial response (at the LS BMD) to 2 years of cyclical etidronate (1.86%) and later response to 2 years of alendronate (7.84%) (p<0.0001). The 10 patients who did not respond at the LS to etidronate alone, showed a significantly better response (mean BMD change +6.3%) when subsequently treated with alendronate (a net difference of 9.3%, p = 0.002). In 15 patients who did not respond at the FN to etidronate alone, the mean response to alendronate was +0.96% (a difference of 7%, p = 0.004). This study shows that pretreatment with 3 years of cyclical etidronate is not detrimental to the subsequent LS BMD response to alendronate. There is evidence that alendronate produced a greater bone density response than etidronate, and patients who did not respond to etidronate with an increase in LS bone density, subsequently did so following alendronate. Received: 22 June 1999 / Accepted: 18 January 2000     

Randomized Trial of the Effects of Risedronate on Vertebral Fractures in Women with Established Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

The purpose of this randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study was to determine the efficacy and safety of risedronate in the prevention of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis. The study was conducted at 80 study centers in Europe and Australia. Postmenopausal women (n= 1226) with two or more prevalent vertebral fractures received risedronate 2.5 or 5 mg/day or placebo; all subjects also received elemental calcium 1000 mg/day, and up to 500 IU/day vitamin D if baseline levels were low. The study duration was 3 years; however, the 2.5 mg group was discontinued by protocol amendment after 2 years. Lateral spinal radiographs were taken annually for assessment of vertebral fractures, and bone mineral density was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at 6-month intervals. Risedronate 5 mg reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures by 49% over 3 years compared with control (p<0.001). A significant reduction of 61% was seen within the first year (p= 0.001). The fracture reduction with risedronate 2.5 mg was similar to that in the 5 mg group over 2 years. The risk of nonvertebral fractures was reduced by 33% compared with control over 3 years (p= 0.06). Risedronate significantly increased bone mineral density at the spine and hip within 6 months. The adverse-event profile of risedronate, including gastrointestinal adverse events, was similar to that of control. Risedronate 5 mg provides effective and well-tolerated therapy for severe postmenopausal osteoporosis, reducing the incidence of vertebral fractures and improving bone density in women with established disease. Received: 29 September 1999 / Accepted: 10 November 1999     

Do Men and Women Fracture Bones at Similar Bone Densities?

When the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for the definition of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women were identified similar proposals were not developed for men as there was insufficient evidence about the relationship between bone density and fracture in men. We have therefore examined the relationship between bone density and vertebral fracture in men and women attending for assessment of possible osteoporosis. Two hundred and sixty-four women (age 64 [SD 10] years) and 37 men (age 55 [10] years) were studied. Bone density was measured in the lumbar spine and femoral neck by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and expressed both as bone mineral density (BMD; g/cm²) and as T-scores. In both sexes there was a sigmoid relationship between the cumulative frequency of vertebral fracture and bone density at both sites. There was a linear relationship between the log odds of fracture and bone mass for both sexes and both sites (r= 0.97–0.99; p<0.0001). The slope of these lines was significantly steeper for men than women. The BMD at which there was 50% risk of fracture was higher in men than women (0.908 vs 0.844 g/cm²). The difference between the slopes was similar when the bone mass was expressed as a T-score. However, the T-score associated with 50% prevalence of fracture was similar in the two sexes (F: −2.77 vs M: −2.60). We conclude that although there is a different relationship between bone density and fracture in the two sexes the current WHO definition of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women can be appropriately applied to men. Received: 24 February 1999 / Accepted: 12 July 1999     

Effects of Bazedoxifene on BMD and Bone Turnover in Postmenopausal Women: 2‐Yr Results of a Randomized,Double‐Blind,Placebo‐, and Active‐Controlled Study

Osteoporosis is an increasingly common health concern in postmenopausal women. In a 2‐yr phase III study, bazedoxifene prevented bone loss, reduced bone turnover, and was well tolerated in early postmenopausal women with normal or low BMD. Introduction : Bazedoxifene is a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator that has increased BMD and bone strength in experimental models, without stimulating breast or uterus. This 24‐mo, randomized, double‐blind study assessed the efficacy and safety of three doses of bazedoxifene compared with placebo and raloxifene in the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Materials and Methods : Healthy postmenopausal women with a BMD T‐score at the lumbar spine or femoral neck between –1.0 and ?2.5 or clinical risk factors for osteoporosis were randomly assigned to one of five groups: bazedoxifene 10, 20, or 40 mg/d, placebo, or raloxifene 60 mg/d. All women received elemental calcium. Efficacy outcomes included changes from baseline through 24 mo in BMD of the lumbar spine, hip, femoral neck, and femoral trochanter and biomarkers of bone metabolism. Results : The intent‐to‐treat population included 1434 women (mean age, 58 yr; mean time from last menstrual period, 11 yr). All doses of bazedoxifene and raloxifene prevented bone loss, whereas in the placebo group, there was significant loss of BMD at all skeletal sites. Mean differences in percent change in lumbar spine BMD from baseline to 24 mo relative to placebo were 1.08 ± 0.28%, 1.41 ± 0.28%, 1.49 ± 0.28%, and 1.49 ± 0.28% for 10, 20, and 40 mg bazedoxifene and 60 mg raloxifene, respectively (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Comparable BMD responses were observed at other body sites. Significant and comparable decreases in serum osteocalcin and C‐telopeptide levels from baseline and relative to placebo with active treatment were observed as early as 3 mo and were sustained through study conclusion (p < 0.001). Overall incidences of adverse events, serious adverse events, and discontinuations caused by adverse events were similar between groups. The most common adverse events included headache, infection, arthralgia, pain, hot flush, and back pain. Conclusions : Treatment with bazedoxifene prevented bone loss and reduced bone turnover equally as well as raloxifene and was generally well tolerated in postmenopausal women with normal/low BMD.     

Effects of Transdermal Estradiol Delivered by a Matrix Patch on Bone Density in Hysterectomized,Postmenopausal Women: A 2-year Placebo-Controlled Trial

This 2-year, double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy in preventing bone loss in postmenopausal women of two doses of transdermal 17β-estradiol (estradiol) delivered by a matrix patch, compared with placebo. One hundred and sixty healthy, hysterectomized postmenopausal volunteers aged 40–60 years with serum estradiol levels <20 pg/ml were started on treatment at four centers in The Netherlands. Every 6 months, bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine, non-dominant wrist and left hip, and markers of bone turnover were assessed in urine and serum. The treatment arms were: estradiol, 100 mg/day (E-100, n= 53), oestradiol, 50 mg/day (E-50, n= 54), placebo (P-100, placebo to E-100, n= 27 or P-50, placebo to E-50, n= 26). Treatment was continued for up to 2 years. After 24 months, BMD of the lumbar spine in the E-100 group differed by 7.7% [5.8–9.5%] (mean [95% confidence interval]) from the placebo group and showed a mean (s.e.m.) increase in BMD from baseline of 5.9% (0.69%). For the E-50 group the difference compared with placebo was 6.2% [4.4–8.0%] and the absolute increase was 4.5% (0.62%); in the placebo group, the absolute change was –2.3% (0.48%). In the total wrist, the changes were: E-100: difference compared with placebo 2.5% [1.5–3.6%], absolute increase 0.6% (0.3%); E-50: difference compared with placebo 2.9% [1.8–3.9%], absolute increase 0.7% (0.25%); and absolute change on placebo: –2.5% (0.35%). In the total hip, the changes were: E-100: difference compared with placebo 3.7% [2.2–5.2%], absolute increase 2.8% (0.5%); E-50: difference compared with placebo: 3.2% [1.8–4.7%], absolute change 2.4% (0.36%); and absolute change on placebo –1.4% (0.66%). Three markers of bone turnover – serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, serum osteocalcin and urinary CTX – fell significantly during the trial. Breast pain was reported by 8% of women on placebo, by 6% of women on E-50 and by 17% of women on E-100. Estradiol delivered by the E-50 matrix patch effectively reversed bone loss in hysterectomized postmenopausal women with few side-effects. The marginal additional gain in BMD with the higher dose may be offset by a more important side effect profile. Received: 9 May 2001 / Accepted: 29 August 2001     

Treatment with raloxifene for 2 years increases vertebral bone mineral density as measured by volumetric quantitative computed tomography

Volumetric quantitative computed tomography (vQCT), using multiple thin-slice acquisition, measures three-dimensional volumetric bone mineral density (BMD, mg/cm3). vQCT is often used to measure BMD of lumbar vertebrae and may detect early changes in trabecular, cortical, or integral BMD that extend beyond the technical limits of areal dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) BMD measurements. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of 2 years of raloxifene (RLX) treatment on several volumetric BMD measures in a subset of postmenopausal women (n=58) enrolled in the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial. Patients in this study were randomized to one of three treatment groups: placebo (n=21), RLX 60 mg/day (n=17), or RLX 120 mg/day (n=20), and all patients received daily calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (400-600 IU) supplementation. Data from the raloxifene treatment groups were pooled for each analysis. Following 2 years of raloxifene treatment, there was a significant percent change from baseline in the vQCT regions of interest (ROIs) of midintegral BMD, total trabecular BMD, and total integral BMD (P<0.05) compared to placebo, while there was no significant change in the spinal DXA BMD measurement. These data provide the first longitudinal assessment by vQCT of changes in vertebral bone density after 2 years of treatment with raloxifene. vQCT appears to be a valuable technique for measuring the effects of raloxifene treatment in this population of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.     

Effect of Soy Protein on Bone Metabolism in Postmenopausal Japanese Women

We conducted a cross-sectional study of the effects of soybean protein intake on bone mineral density and biochemical markers in 85 postmenopausal Japanese women. Nutrients in the diet of postmenopausal Japanese women visiting the osteoporosis unit, including subjects with normal lumbar spine bone mineral density (L2–4 BMD), were investigated by questionnaire, and the calculated daily energy, protein, soy protein and calcium intake were obtained. L2–4 BMD was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and assays done of serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and serum intact osteocalcin (IOC) as bone formation markers and urinary pyridinoline (UPYR) and urinary deoxypyridinoline (UDPYR) as bone resorption markers. Soy protein intake was significantly associated with the Z-score for L2–4 BMD (r= 0.23, p = 0.038) and UDPYR (r =−0.23, p = 0.034). Stepwise multiple regression analyses showed that soy protein intake is significantly associated with the Z-score for L2–4 BMD (β= 0.225, p = 0.04) and UDPYR (β=−0.08, p = 0.03) among four nutritional factors. These results suggest that high soy protein intake is associated with a higher bone mineral density and a lower level of bone resorption, but further studies are needed to confirm the causal dynamic mechanisms. Received: 17 September 1999 / Accepted: 29 February 2000