Different prolactin, thyrotropin, and thyroxine responses after prolonged intermittent or continuous infusions of thyrotropin-releasing hormone in rhesus monkeys

Serum PRL, TSH, and T4 secretion during prolonged continuous or intermittent iv infusions of TRH were studied in 14 adult ovariectomized rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). For 9 days, TRH was administered intermittently at 0.33 or 3.3 micrograms/min for 6 of every 60 min and continuously at 0.33 micrograms/min. With both modes, the PRL levels and responsiveness to TRH simulation peaked on day 1 and then fell to levels that were still higher than the preinfusion values; levels for the intermittently treated group on days 3-9 were 2- to 4-fold above prestimulation levels and significantly (P less than 0.01) higher than levels for the continuously treated group. Elevated basal levels and PRL responses to TRH pulses were similar during the 0.33 and 3.3 micrograms/min pulses of the 9-day treatment period. For both TRH modes, TSH levels were elevated significantly (P less than 0.001) on day 1 [this increase was higher with continuous infusion (P less than 0.001)] and then fell to preinfusion levels by day 3. Serum T4 also increased during both continuous and intermittent TRH stimulations. However, serum T4 levels were significantly lower (P less than 0.01) after intermittent TRH (both 0.33 and 3.3 micrograms/min) than after continuous (0.33 micrograms) TRH (8 +/- 1.1 and 10 +/- 1.8 micrograms T4/dl vs. 18 +/- 3.1 micrograms, respectively). These PRL and T4 responses were replicated when the mode of administering 0.33 micrograms/min TRH was reversed after 9 days. An iv bolus of TRH (20 micrograms) after 9 days of continuous or intermittent TRH infusion caused significant release of PRL and TSH, an indication that neither mode of administration resulted in pituitary depletion of releasable hormone. We have concluded that intermittent TRH is more effective in elevating serum PRL, and continuous TRH is more effective in raising TSH and T4 levels. Thus, the manner of TRH secretion by the hypothalamus may determine its relative physiological importance in the stimulation of lactotropes and thyrotropes.     

Arginine stimulates growth hormone secretion by suppressing endogenous somatostatin secretion

To determine how arginine (Arg) stimulates GH secretion, we investigated its interaction with GHRH in vivo and in vitro. Six normal men were studied on four occasions: 1) Arg-TRH, 30 g arginine were administered in 500 mL saline in 30 min, followed by an injection of 200 micrograms TRH; 2) GHRH-Arg-TRH, 100 micrograms GHRH-(1-44) were given iv as a bolus immediately before the Arg infusion, followed by 200 micrograms TRH, iv; 3) GHRH test, 100 micrograms GHRH were given as an iv bolus; and 4) TRH test, 200 micrograms TRH were given iv as a bolus dose. Blood samples were collected at 15-min intervals for 30 min before and 120 min after the start of each infusion. Anterior pituitary cells from rats were coincubated with Arg (3, 6, 15, 30, and 60 mg/mL) and GHRH (0.05, 1, 5, and 10 nmol/L) for a period of 3 h. Rat GH was measured in the medium. After Arg-TRH the mean serum GH concentration increased significantly from 0.6 to 23.3 +/- 7.3 (+/- SE) micrograms/L at 60 min. TRH increased serum TSH and PRL significantly (maximum TSH, 11.1 +/- 1.8 mU/L; maximum PRL, 74.6 +/- 8.4 micrograms/L). After GHRH-Arg-TRH, the maximal serum GH level was significantly higher (72.7 +/- 13.4 micrograms/L) than that after Arg-TRH alone, whereas serum TSH and PRL increased to comparable levels (TSH, 10.2 +/- 3.0 mU/L; PRL, 64.4 +/- 13.6 micrograms/L). GHRH alone increased serum GH to 44.9 +/- 9.8 micrograms/L, significantly less than when GHRH, Arg, and TRH were given. TRH alone increased serum TSH to 6.6 +/- 0.6 mU/L, significantly less than the TSH response to Arg-TRH. The PRL increase after TRH only also was lower (47.2 +/- 6.8 micrograms/L) than the PRL response after Arg-TRH. In vitro Arg had no effect on basal and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion. Our results indicate that Arg administered with GHRH led to higher serum GH levels than did a maximally stimulatory dose of GHRH or Arg alone. The serum TSH response to Arg-TRH also was greater than that to TRH alone. We conclude that the stimulatory effects of Arg are mediated by suppression of endogenous somatostatin secretion.     

Effect of simultaneous administration of GHRH (1-40) and TRH on GH, PRL and TSH secretion in normal man

The GHRH test represents a new tool in the study of secretion in man. Nine normal fasting males received on separate occasions in random order 1) GHRH 1-40 (1 microgram/Kg bw) iv at time 0; 2) TRH (6 micrograms/min) infusion between -30 and +120 min; 3) GHRH 1-40 (1 microgram/Kg bw) iv at time 0 plus TRH (6 micrograms/min) infusion between -30 and +120 min. Blood samples were drawn for GH, PRL and TSH at -90, -60, -30, 0 min and then every 15 min for 2 h. GHRH significantly increased GH in all subjects. The same GH response was found during GHRH plus TRH test. No effect was found either on PRL and TSH secretion after GHRH administration, or on GH pattern after TRH administration. A significant decrease of TSH, but not of PRL response was observed after GHRH plus TRH administration in comparison to TRH alone. These results underline that the inhibitory effect exerted by TRH on GH secretion during some experimental conditions is not linked to a pituitary interference between GHRH and TRH. The difference in TSH secretion, following GHRH plus TRH in comparison with TRH alone, could be due to a GHRH-induced central inhibitory mechanism, probably GHRH-related.     

Comparative study of intravenous, nasal, oral and buccal TRH administration among healthy subjects

Four different modes of TRH application (400 micrograms iv, 1 mg nasal, 10 mg buccal and 40 mg oral) were investigated in young healthy subjects for evaluation of thyrotropin (TSH) and prolactin (PRL) stimulation. Plasma TSH, PRL, T4, T3, thyroxine-binding-globulin (TBG) were measured by radioimmunoassay. There were significant increases of TSH and PRL following TRH stimulation by all test forms. Bolus injection of TRH led to maximal TSH and PRL plasma levels within 20 min to 30 min, compared with 30 min to 45 min following nasal administration. Buccal and oral application produced more prolonged TSH and PRL increases, achieving plateau levels after 120 min to 180 min. Stimulated PRL levels were higher in women than in men. Uniformity of PRL response was better after iv or nasal than buccal and oral TRH stimulation. Known side effects were lower after nasal than iv TRH application. Buccal and oral administration provoked no side effects. Nasal TRH application seems to be a well suited test form for TSH and PRL stimulation.     

Interaction of L-dopa and GHRH on GH secretion in normal men

To determine how L-dopa stimulates GH secretion, we investigated its interaction with GHRH in vivo. Six normal men were studied on 4 occasions: 1) L-dopa-TRH: 500 mg L-dopa orally followed by 200 micrograms TRH 60 min later; 2) L-dopa-GHRH-TRH: 100 micrograms GHRH 1-44 iv 30 min after L-dopa followed by 200 micrograms TRH iv; 3) GHRH-TRH: 100 micrograms GHRH iv at 0 min, 30 min later 200 micrograms TRH iv; 4) TRH test: 200 micrograms TRH iv as a bolus. After L-dopa-TRH GH-levels increased significantly from 0.6 micrograms/l to 25.8 +/- 9.6 (SE) micrograms/l at 60 min. Only a slight TSH and no PRL increase was observed after L-dopa-TRH. After L-dopa-GHRH-TRH the GH-increase was significantly higher (45.7 +/- 11.1 micrograms/l) compared to L-dopa-TRH alone. GHRH-TRH increased GH-levels to 52.5 +/- 12.1 micrograms/l, which was not significantly different from the GH-levels obtained when L-dopa-GHRH-TRH were given. TRH increased serum TSH and PRL to 6.3 +/- 0.7 microU/ml and 715 +/- 136 microU/ml, respectively, which was significantly higher compared to the TSH responses after L-dopa-TRH. The PRL and TSH increase after TRH only was also higher (TSH-max: 5.7 +/- 0.5 microU/ml; PRL-max: 899 +/- 154 microU/ml) compared to the TSH and PRL responses after L-dopa-TRH. Our results show that the combination of L-dopa with GHRH leads to the same GH response as GHRH only. However, both responses are significantly higher than the one after L-dopa alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The interaction of GHRH with TRH in acromegaly: a controlled study

In a single-blind placebo-controlled study, the effect of an iv bolus injection of 100 micrograms GHRH(1-29)NH2 on the response to 200 micrograms TRH was assessed in 10 untreated patients with acromegaly to determine whether GHRH interacts with TRH in acromegaly, as previously described in healthy subjects. The combination of GHRH(1-29)NH2 with TRH resulted in a larger increment of peak and of integrated plasma TSH and PRL levels than after TRH alone. GHRH alone had no effect on TSH secretion and only a modest effect on PRL secretion. These findings suggest that in acromegaly, like in healthy individuals, GHRH potentiates the TSH response to TRH and that the effects of GHRH and TRH on PRL secretion are additive.     

The effect of 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine or thyrotropin-releasing hormone on pituitary hormone responses to arginine infusions in hypothyroid patients

Serum PRL and GH responses to a control arginine infusion were determined in seven hypothyroid patients. During the infusion, basal TSH levels fell slightly but significantly. On a following day, a second arginine infusion was performed, 5 min after iv injection of 500 micrograms TRH. The mean peak PRL response was enhanced 6-fold and occurred earlier, while the mean peak GH response remained unaffected. Mean peak TSH levels were only 128% above baseline after TRH. On a third day, a third arginine infusion was performed 4 h after oral administration of 100 micrograms T3; mean serum T3 levels were increased from 57 to a peak of 481 ng/dl 5 h after T3. The mean GH response was significantly reduced by 71% at 90 min, with an overall reduction of the GH output of 47%, while the PRL response remained unaffected. Thus, acute elevation of serum T3 levels in hypothyroidism appear to inhibit the mean GH response to arginine.     

Effect of lysine vasopressin on basal and TRH stimulated TSH and PRL release in normal men

In order to test the possible effects of lysine vasopressin (LVP) on basal and TRH stimulated TSH and PRL release, an iv bolus of LVP (0.06 IU/kg bw) was injected alone or just before TRH (20 or 400 micrograms iv) in 18 normal male subjects. The administration of LVP modified neither the basal secretion of TSH and PRL nor the TSH and PRL release induced by 20 or 400 micrograms TRH. These data suggest that in humans, vasopressin is not involved in the control of TSH and PRL release at the anterior pituitary level.     

Effects of repetitive administration of thyrotropin-releasing hormone at short intervals in acromegaly

We investigated the pattern of GH secretion in response to repetitive TRH administration in patients with active acromegaly and in normal subjects. Nine acromegalic patients and 10 normal subjects received three doses of 200 micrograms of TRH iv at 90-min intervals. There was a marked serum GH rise in acromegalic patients after each TRH dose (net incremental area under the curve [nAUC]: first dose = 4448 +/- 1635 micrograms.min.l-1; second dose = 3647 +/- 1645 micrograms.min.l-1; third dose = 4497 +/- 2416 micrograms.min.l-1; NS), though individual GH responses were very variable. In normal subjects TRH did not elicit GH secretion even after repeated stimulation. Each TRH administration stimulated PRL release in acromegalic patients, though the nAUC of PRL was significantly higher after the first (1260 +/- 249 micrograms.min.l-1) than after the second and the third TRH administration (478 +/- 195 and 615 +/- 117 micrograms.min.l-1, respectively; P less than 0.01). In normal subjects too, PRL secretion was lower after repeated stimulation (first dose = 1712 +/- 438 micrograms.min.l-1; second dose = 797 +/- 177 micrograms.min.l-1; third dose = 903 +/- 229 micrograms.min.l-1 P less than 0.01), though different kinetics of PRL secretion were evident, when compared with acromegalic patients. TSH secretion, assessed in only 4 patients, was stimulated after each TRH dose, though a minimal but significant reduction of nAUC of TSH after repeated TRH challenge occurred. Both T3 and T4 increased steadily in the 4 patients. The same pattern of TSH, T3, and T4 secretion occurred in normal subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of the effects of pulsatile and continuous TRH infusion on TSH release in men

Pulsatile secretion of hypothalamic releasing factors modulates the release of pituitary hormones. To compare the effects of pulsatile and continuous administration of TRH on TSH secretion, we studied six healthy euthyroid 20- to 38-year-old men by obtaining blood samples every 20 minutes for 12 hours (8 AM to 8 PM) during five days of study. TRH was administered according to the following schedule: day 1 (no TRH, control); day 2 and subsequent day 3 (20 micrograms IV bolus of TRH every 96 minutes); 6 to 17 days rest; then consecutive days 4 and 5 (continuous infusion of 20 micrograms TRH/96 minutes) for 12 hours on and 12 hours off. The highest mean serum TSH levels occurred on the first day of pulsatile TRH. Serum TSH on pulsatile days 1 and 2 and continuous day 1 was significantly greater than on the control day. Similarly, the mean TSH on each day of pulsatile TRH was greater than the mean TSH on the corresponding days of continuous TRH administration. The highest serum T4 and T3 levels were observed on pulsatile day 2, suggesting that the decrease in serum TSH on this day was due to thyroid hormone negative feedback at the pituitary. The mean T4 and T3 values on continuous day 1 and 2 did not differ significantly, suggesting that other factors, including "down-regulation" of the pituitary TRH receptors by the continuous TRH infusion may be involved in the further decline of TSH levels on continuous day 2. We conclude that pulsatile TRH infusion releases more TSH, T3, and T4 than the corresponding amount of TRH administered continuously.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of acute infusion of erythropoietin on paradoxical responses of growth hormone to thyrotropin-releasing hormone in acromegalic patients

OBJECTIVE: Our aim has been to evaluate the effects of i.v. infusion of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) on the responses of growth hormone (GH), prolactin (PRL) and thyrotropin (TSH) to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) stimulation in acromegalic patients. METHODS: We studied 16 patients (8 females, aged 29-68 years) with active acromegaly and 12 control subjects (7 females, 24-65 years). All participants were tested with TRH (400 microg i.v. as bolus) and with TRH plus rhEPO (40 U/kg at a constant infusion rate for 30 min, starting 15 min before TRH injection) on different days. Blood samples were obtained between -30 and 120 min for GH and PRL determinations, and between -30 and 90 min for TSH determinations. Hormone responses were studied by a time-averaged (area under the secretory curve (AUC)) and time-independent (peak values) analysis. RESULTS: Twelve patients exhibited a paradoxical GH reaction after TRH administration with great interindividual variability in GH levels. When patients were stimulated with rhEPO plus TRH there were no changes in the variability of GH responses or in the peak and AUC for GH secretion. Infusion with rhEPO did not induce any significant change in GH secretion in normal subjects. Baseline and TRH-stimulated PRL concentrations in patients did not differ from those values found in controls. When TRH was injected during the rhEPO infusion, a significant (P<0.05) increase in PRL concentrations at 15-120 min was found in acromegalic patients. Accordingly, the PRL peak and the AUC for PRL secretion were significantly increased in patients. Infusion with rhEPO had no effect on TRH-induced PRL release in control subjects. Baseline TSH concentrations, as well as the TSH peak and the AUC after TRH, were significantly lower in patients than in controls. Infusion with rhEPO modified neither the peak TSH reached nor the AUC for TSH secretion after TRH injection in acromegalic patients and in healthy volunteers. CONCLUSION: Results in patients with acromegaly suggest that (i) the paradoxical GH response to TRH is not modified by rhEPO infusion, (ii) rhEPO has no effect on TRH-induced TSH release, and (iii) acute rhEPO administration increases the TRH-induced PRL release in acromegalic patients.     

INTERACTION OF THYROTROPHIN RELEASING HORMONE AND THE ENKEPHALIN ANALOGUE DAMME ON PITUITARY HORMONE SECRETION

Because TRH counteracts the inhibitory effect of opiate peptides on LH secretion in cultured cells from normal pituitaries, six normal postmenopausal women were studied to determine whether TRH interacts in vivo with opioid peptides in the regulation of pituitary hormone secretion. At two different times a constant 3 h infusion of either saline or TRH (5 micrograms/min) was initiated. At 60 min a 250 micrograms bolus of the opiate agonist peptide D-Ala2-MePhe4-met-enkephalin-0-ol (DAMME) was injected in one of the two saline and TRH infusion tests. The four treatments, i.e. saline infusion alone, saline infusion with a DAMME bolus, TRH infusion alone; and TRH infusion with DAMME bolus were given at random with an interval of at least 7 d. Blood samples were taken every 15 min during the 3 h study. DAMME induced a significant fall (P less than 0.05) in serum LH (from 35 +/- 8.5 to 18.3 +/- 5.1 mIU/ml) (mean +/- SEM) without significantly affecting FSH levels (from 29 +/- 11.2 to 26.9 +/- 12.4 mIU/ml). These changes were not antagonized by the continuous infusion of TRH. PRL had a monophasic response pattern to continuous isolated TRH infusion; the basal levels increased from 4.2 +/- 1.2 to 24.5 +/- 6.8 ng/ml at 30 min and then slowly decreased with a plateau from 90 min until the end of the study. DAMME administration at 60 min induced a significant second peak of PRL secretion (44 +/- 6.5 ng/ml) 30 min later (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Repetitive or continuous thyrotropin (TSH)-releasing hormone administration induces a biphasic rise in plasma TSH in euthyroid but not in hypothyroid rats

In euthyroid rats, repetitive bolus injections of 0.1, 1, or 5 micrograms/100 g BW TRH every 15 min for 2 h produced a biphasic rise in the plasma TSH concentration. After an initial peak at 15 min, plasma TSH fell at 60 min to a nadir 50-80% of the 15-min peak, then rose again by 90 min to a plateau with approximately the same amplitude as the initial peak. Plasma TSH remained at this level until TRH injections were stopped at 2 h, then fell to the pre-TRH baseline by 3 h. A similar biphasic rise in plasma TSH was produced by constant infusion of 0.01, 0.1, or 1 microgram/min TRH for 3 h. If the dose of bolus TRH injected was increased at 45 min, the dip in plasma TSH at 60 min was significantly decreased. A single iv injection of 1 microgram/100 g BW T4 immediately or 4 h before the bolus TRH injections did not abolish the biphasic TSH response. However, the T4 injection 4 h before TRH significantly attenuated the amplitude of the TSH response. In hypothyroid rats, either repetitive bolus injections or constant infusion of TRH induced only a single peak of plasma TSH at 15-30 min, after which plasma TSH fell to and remained at the pre-TRH baseline. If the hypothyroid rats were injected with 2 micrograms/100 g BW T4 for 4 days before TRH bolus injections, a biphasic TSH response to continual TRH, identical to that in euthyroid rats, was produced. The pituitary TSH content of the hypothyroid rats was significantly subnormal. T4 treatment for 4 days restored both plasma and pituitary TSH levels to the euthyroid range. Our data indicate that 1) constant or repetitive exposure to TRH induces a biphasic rise in plasma TSH in euthyroid, but not in hypothyroid, rats; 2) this biphasic phenomenon is not produced by negative feedback of T4 on the thyrotroph; and 3) the rapid development of refractoriness to TRH in hypothyroid rats is not dependent on continuous exposure to a constant concentration of TRH, but may be related to the reduced TSH content of the hypothyroid thyrotroph.     

Divergent influences of calcium ions on releasing factor-stimulated anterior pituitary hormone secretion in normal man

To investigate the influence of calcium ions on the secretion of anterior pituitary hormones in response to stimulation by exogenous hypothalmic releasing factors in man, we measured serum concentrations of pituitary hormones serially during a continuous infusion of combined TRH (2 micrograms/min) and GnRH (1 microgram/min), with concomitant iv saline or calcium administration. Compared to saline, calcium administration was associated with a significant increase in GnRH-TRH-stimulated LH and FSH release and a corresponding rise in serum testosterone concentrations. The effect of calcium ions on gonadotropin secretion was specific, because releasing factor-stimulated secretion of TSH and PRL was suppressed by hypercalcemia. Serum concentrations of GH were not significantly altered under these conditions. In summary, the present results provide the first in vivo evidence that acute infusion of calcium ions augments GnRH-TRH-stimulated secretion of LH and FSH, with an accompanying increase in serum testosterone levels. In contrast, hypercalcemia did not alter serum GH concentrations, and it suppressed GnRH-TRH-stimulated release of PRL and TSH. We conclude that calcium ions can selectively influence releasing factor-stimulated secretion of certain anterior pituitary hormones in man.     

Effects of disodium EDTA and calcium infusion on prolactin and thyrotropin responses to thyrotropin-releasing hormone in healthy man

To determine the impact of induced hypo- and hypercalcemia on TRH (400 micrograms)-stimulated TSH and PRL release, healthy subjects (n = 11) were infused with 5% glucose in water (n = 11), disodium EDTA (n = 11), or calcium gluconate (n = 7). TRH was given as an iv bolus 60 min (5% glucose and EDTA) and 120 min (calcium) after initiation of the respective infusion. Basal plasma concentrations of TSH remained unchanged during induced hypo- and hypercalcemia, whereas those of PRL fell during the latter (P less than 0.05). The mean sum of increments (0-90 min) in PRL and TSH was considerably greater during hypocalcemia than during hypercalcemia (PRL, P less than 0.002; TSH, P less than 0.005). The increments in the plasma hormone concentration above basal after iv TRH were increased compared to those in normocalcemia (PRL, 98.4 +/- 37.9 ng/ml; TSH, 38.9 +/- 11.8 microU/ml) during hypocalcemia [PRL, 128 +/- 47.8 ng/ml (P less than 0.002); TSH, 46.7 +/- 12.8 microU/ml; (P less than 0.005)], but were impaired during hypercalcemia [PRL, 70.1 +/- 27 ng/ml (P less than 0.002); TSH, 28.9 +/- 8.5 microU/ml (P less than 0.025)]. The mean sum of increments in PRL was related to concentrations of both serum calcium (r = -0.59; P less than 0.01) and PTH (r = 0.51; P less than 0.05). A relation was also seen between the incremental responses of TSH and serum calcium (r = -0.52; P less than 0.05), PTH (r = 0.55; P less than 0.01), and phosphorus (r = -0.55; P less than 0.01). We conclude that in healthy man, TRH-mediated release of both PRL and TSH are inversely related to serum calcium concentrations in such a manner that hormone secretion is enhanced by acute hypocalcemia, but blunted by hypercalcemia.     

EFFECT OF LOW-DOSE DOPAMINE INFUSION ON BASAL AND STIMULATED TSH AND PROLACTIN CONCENTRATIONS IN MAN

Dopamine (DA) infused at pharmacological doses in man inhibits thyrotrophin (TSH) secretion, although the physiological significance of this observation is unclear. The effect of low-dose DA infusion (0.1 microgram/kg/min) on TSH and prolactin (PRL) concentrations during stimulation with thyrotrophin releasing hormone (TRH) in normal male subjects is reported. Six subjects were given intravenous DA or placebo infusions for 165 min on separate days. A bolus of TRH (7.5 micrograms) was given at + 90 min, followed by infusion of the tripeptide (750 ng/min) for 45 min during both DA and placebo studies. In all subjects TRH administration caused a small rise in TSH which was partially inhibited by DA (peak 5.73 +/- 0.85 mU/l vs 4.58 +/- 1.09, P less than 0.05). PRL response to TRH was almost totally inhibited by DA (620 +/- 164 mU/l vs 234 +/- 96, P less than 0.05); integrated TSH and PRL responses to TRH were similarly inhibited by DA. Circulating plasma DA concentration during infusion of the catecholamine was 3.46 +/- 1.00 ng/ml, which is within the range reported in pituitary stalk plasma of other species. These data support the hypothesis that DA is a physiological modulator of TSH secretion in normal man. Major differences in the time course of TSH and PRL responses to TRH, and in the suppressive effect of DA on these responses suggest that there are fundamental differences in stimulus-secretion coupling for TRH and the lactotroph and thyrotroph.     

Effect of the dopamine agonist, lergotrile mesylate, on circulating anterior pituitary hormones in man.

The effects of the ergoline derivative, lergotrile mesylate, on the serum levels of PRL, GH, TSH, LH, FSH, cortisol, and blood sugar were studied in six normal males. The effects of lergotrile mesylate on the serum levels of GH and PRL were also studied in eight patients with acromegaly and in two with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. In the normal subjects, 2 mg oral lergotrile lowered basal PRL levels after 90 min and markedly impaired the PRL response to TRH (200 micrograms iv); the mean peak value +/- SE was 8.3 +/- 1.1 micrograms/liter, compared to the control value of 66.6 /+- 11.3 micrograms/liter. Lergotrile raised serum GH levels in five of the six subjects to peaks of 8-49 micrograms/liter, compared to 2-8 micrograms/liter after placebo. In three subjects, the GH response to lergotrile was attenuated by the prior administration of the dopamine antagonist, metoclopramide (10 mg orally). Lergotrile had no effect on FSH and LH levels under basal conditions or after the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH; 100 micrograms iv). Circulating TSH levels were unaltered basally but impaired after TRH. Blood sugar levels were unaltered; serum cortisol was elevated in five of six subjects; there was a brief depression of diastolic blood pressure, but no change in pulse rate. The side effects after lergotrile were variable, with drowsiness as a consistent feature. These actions are similar to those of bromocriptine (an ergot derivative treatment of hyperprolactinemia and acromegaly, to suppress PRL and GH secretion, and in parkinsonism. Therefore, it may be expected that lergotrile could fulfill these clinical uses; however, in the studies comparing the effects of single oral doses of lergotrile (2 mg) and bromocriptine (2.5 mg) on GH and PRL secretion in patients with acromegaly and hyperprolactinemia, lergotrile in the dose used has been found to have an earlier onset and shorter duration of action.     

Infusion of beta-endorphin has no suppressive effect on the releasing hormone-stimulated pituitary-adrenal-axis of normal human subjects

The existence of a short-loop feedback inhibition of pituitary ACTH release by administration of beta-endorphin was postulated. However, data on the effect of peripherally administered beta-endorphin in humans are highly controversial. We infused human synthetic beta-endorphin at a constant rate of 1 microgram.kg-1.min-1 or normal saline to 7 normal volunteers for 90 min. Thirty min after starting the beta-endorphin or placebo infusion, releasing hormones were injected as a bolus iv (oCRH and GHRH 1 microgram/kg, GnRH 100 micrograms, TRH 200 micrograms) and blood was drawn for measurements of beta-endorphin immunoreactivity, all other pituitary hormones, and cortisol. Infusion of beta-endorphin resulted in high beta-endorphin plasma levels with a rapid decrease after the infusion was stopped. During the control infusion, beta-endorphin plasma levels rose in response to CRH. Plasma ACTH and serum cortisol levels in response to the releasing hormone were not different in subjects infused with beta-endorphin or placebo. The PRL response to TRH was significantly higher after beta-endorphin than after placebo (area under the stimulation curve 1209 +/- 183 vs 834 +/- 104 micrograms.l-1.h). There was no difference in the response of all other hormones measured. Our data on ACTH and cortisol secretion do not support the concept of a short-loop negative feedback of beta-endorphin acting at the site of the pituitary.     

Basal serum prolactin levels and prolactin responses to constant infusions of thyrotropin releasing hormone in healthy aging men

We measured serum prolactin (PRL) levels by RIA before and during a 240-min constant infusion of TRH (0.4 microgram/min iv) in three similarly sized groups of healthy aging men 30 to 49, 50 to 69, and 70 to 96 years. Basal data were evaluated by analysis of variance with Duncan's multiple range test and regression analysis. Mean basal serum PRL level was elevated (p less than .05) in the oldest group, attributable to PRL elevations (between 20 and 40 ng/ml) in 4 men over 75 years. Serum PRL levels decreased (p less than .001) from -30 min to 0 min before TRH infusion in all groups, but there was no age-dependent difference (p greater than .3) in the magnitude of the reduction. Repeated measures analysis of variance showed increased serum PRL levels (p less than .001) during TRH infusion in all age groups, and an age-dependent increase (p less than .05) in magnitude of peak PRL response. This significant difference was between the two oldest age groups early in the infusion. Chi-square analysis revealed an increased (p less than .05) frequency of early (less than 120 min) peak responses in the oldest age group. The present data suggest that basal and TRH-stimulated PRL secretion may be augmented in some healthy older men.     

Hypothalamic regulation of pulsatile thyrotopin secretion.

To determine the mechanism underlying pulsatile TSH secretion, 24-h serum TSH levels were measured in three groups of five healthy volunteers by sampling blood every 10 min. The influence of an 8-h infusion of dopamine (200 mg), somatostatin (500 micrograms), or nifedipine (5 mg) on the pulsatile release of TSH was tested using a cross-over design. The amount of TSH released per pulse was significantly lowered by these drugs, resulting in significantly decreased mean basal TSH serum levels. However, pulses of TSH were still detectable at all times. The TSH response to TRH (200 micrograms) tested in separate experiments was significantly lowered after 3 h of nifedipine infusion compared to the saline control value. Nifedipine treatment did not alter basal, pulsatile, or TRH-stimulated PRL secretion. The persistence of TSH pulses under dopamine and somatostatin treatment and the blunted TSH responses to nifedipine infusion support the hypothesis that pulsatile TSH secretion is under the control of hypothalamic TRH. The 24-h TSH secretion pattern achieved under stimulation with exogenous TRH in two patients with hypothalamic destruction through surgical removal of a craniopharyngioma provided further circumstantial evidence for this assumption. No TSH pulses and low basal TSH secretion were observed under basal conditions (1700-2400 h), whereas subsequent repetitive TRH challenge (25 micrograms/2 h to 50 micrograms/1 h) led to a pulsatile release of TSH with fusion of TSH pulses, resulting in a TSH secretion pattern strikingly similar to the circadian variation. These data suggest that pulsatile and circadian TSH secretions are predominantly controlled by TRH.