Graft vasculopathy in the skin of a human hand allograft: implications for diagnosis of rejection of vascularized composite allografts

Whereas vascularized composite allografts often undergo acute rejections early in the postgraft period, rejection manifesting with severe vascular changes (graft vasculopathy) has only been observed on three occasions in humans. We report a hand‐allografted patient who developed severe rejection following discontinuation of the immunosuppressive treatment. It manifested clinically with erythematous maculopapules on the skin and pathologically with graft vasculopathy that affected both large vessels and smaller cutaneous ones. The observation that graft vasculopathy can affect skin vessels shows that it is amenable to diagnosis with usual skin biopsy as recommended for the follow‐up of these allografts. Graft vasculopathy developing in the setting of vascularized composite allografts likely represents chronic rejection due to under‐immunosuppression and, if confirmed, should be included in a future update of the Banff classification of vascularized composite allograft rejection.     

Graft Vasculopathy in Clinical Hand Transplantation

Allogeneic hand transplantation is now a clinical reality. While results have been encouraging, acute rejection rates are higher than in their solid‐organ counterparts. In contrast, chronic rejections, as defined by vasculopathy and/or fibrosis and atrophy of skin and other tissues, as well as antibody mediated rejection, have not been reported in a compliant hand transplant recipient. Monitoring vascularized composite allograft (VCA) hand recipients for rejection has routinely involved punch skin biopsies, vascular imaging and graft appearance. Our program, which has transplanted a total of 6 hand recipients, has experience which challenges these precepts. We present evidence that the vessels, both arteries and veins may also be a primary target of rejection in the hand. Two of our recipients developed severe intimal hyperplasia and vasculopathy early post‐transplant. An analysis of events and our four other patients has shown that the standard techniques used for surveillance of rejection (i.e. punch skin biopsies, DSA and conventional vascular imaging studies) are inadequate for detecting the early stages of vasculopathy. In response, we have initiated studies using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) to evaluate the vessel wall thickness. These findings suggest that vasculopathy should be a focus of frequent monitoring in VCA of the hand.     

Graft vasculopathy of vascularized composite allografts in humans: a literature review and retrospective study

Mechanisms of chronic rejection of vascularized composite allografts (VCA) remain poorly understood and likely present along a spectrum of highly varied clinicopathological findings. Across both animal and human VCA however, graft vasculopathy (GV) has been the most consistent pathological finding resulting clinically in irreversible allograft dysfunction and eventual loss. A literature review of all reported clinical VCA cases with documented GV up to December 2018 was thus performed to elucidate the possible mechanisms involved. Relevant data extracted include C4d deposition, donor‐specific antibody (DSA) formation, extent of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch, pretransplant panel reactive antibody levels, induction and maintenance immunosuppression used, the number of preceding acute rejection episodes, and time to histological confirmation of GV. Approximately 6% (13 of 205) of all VCA patients reported to date developed GV at a mean of 6 years post‐transplantation. 46% of these patients have either lost or had their VCAs removed. Neither C4d nor DSA alone was predictive of GV development; however, when both are present, VCA loss appears inevitable due to progressive GV. Of utmost concern, GV in VCA does not appear to be abrogated by currently available immunosuppressive treatment and is essentially irreversible by the time of diagnosis with allograft loss a likely eventuality.     

Vascularized Bone Marrow‐Based Immunosuppression Inhibits Rejection of Vascularized Composite Allografts in Nonhuman Primates

Vascularized composite allograft (VCA) transplantation (also referred to as composite tissue allotransplantation) has demonstrated clinical success in cases of hand, arm and face transplantation despite prior belief that skin provides an insurmountable barrier to allograft rejection. These overall good outcomes are facilitated by substantial immunosuppressive requirements in otherwise healthy patients, yet still demonstrate frequent rejection episodes. We developed a nonhuman primate model of facial segment allotransplantation to elucidate the unique pathophysiology and immunosuppressive requirements of VCA with addition of concomitant vascularized bone marrow (VBM). Heterotopically transplanted facial segment VCA with VBM treated only with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) demonstrated prolonged rejection‐free survival, compared to VCA without VBM that demonstrated early rejection episodes and graft loss. While VCA with VBM demonstrated sporadic macrochimerism, acute and chronic rejection and graft loss occurred after discontinuation of immunosuppression. These data support an immunomodulatory role of VBM in VCA that reduces immunosuppressive requirements while providing improved outcomes.     

Composite Tissue Vasculopathy and Degeneration Following Multiple Episodes of Acute Rejection in Reconstructive Transplantation

Transplant vasculopathy has not been systematically investigated in composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA). The impact of multiple acute rejections (ARs) on long‐term graft outcomes in reconstructive transplantation remains unknown. This study in a rat hind‐limb allotransplantation model systematically analyzes vasculopathy and tissue‐specific pathological changes secondary to multiple AR episodes. LEW rats were transplanted with BN rat hind limbs and treated as follows: Group 1 (Iso): isografts. Group 2 (CsA): Cyclosporine (CsA) qd; Group 3 (mult AR): CsA and dexamethasone only when AR was observed. No AR was observed in Groups 1 and 2. Multiple AR were observed in Group 3, and each episode was completely reversed (clinically) with pulsed CsA + dexamethasone treatment. Group 3 animals demonstrated significant vascular lesions along with skin and muscle atrophy, upregulation of profibrotic gene expression and fibrosis when compared to Groups 1 and 2. In addition, allograft bone was sclerotic, weak and prone to malunion and nonunion. Interestingly, vasculopathy was a late finding, whereas muscle atrophy with macrophage infiltration was seen early, after only a few AR episodes. Taken together, multiple AR episodes lead to vasculopathy and tissue‐specific pathology in CTA. This is the first evidence of ‘composite tissue vasculopathy and degeneration (CTVD)’ in CTA.     

Concerns on Clinical Application of Composite Tissue Allotransplantation

Composite tissue allograft has become a clinical reality: hands, vascularized femoral diaphyses, abdominal walls, a larynx have all been transplanted throughout the world. Conventional immunosuppressive protocol has shown to be sufficient and effective. Rejection has been prevented in most cases and when it did occur it was successfully reversed. Skin has been confirmed as the principal target of acute and chronic rejection. There has been no mortality or early graft losses and, particularly in hand transplantation, the survival graft rate is 91% with a follow-up period ranging from 6 months to 61 months. The side effects of immunosuppression are limited and include primarily transient hyperglycemia, an increase in creatinine values and some opportunistic infections (i.e. cytomegalovirus infection). Nerve regeneration and cortical reorganization have been demonstrated in hand transplantation. Functional results have been encouraging particularly for hand and larynx transplantation. Appropriate indications and patient selection, based particularly on patient motivation and compliance, are essential requirements for composite tissue allograft success.     

Molecular-level HLA mismatch is associated with rejection and worsened graft survival in heart transplant recipients – a retrospective study

The aim was to evaluate the association of molecular-level human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching with post-transplant graft survival, rejection, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). We retrospectively analyzed all primary cardiac transplant recipients between 01/1984-06/2016. 1167 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria and had HLA typing information available. In 312 donor-recipient pairs, typing at serological split antigen level was available. We used the Epitope MisMatch Algorithm to calculate the number of amino acid differences in antibody-verified HLA eplets (amino acid mismatch load (AAMM)) between donor and recipient. Patients with a higher HLA-DR AAMM load had inferior 1-year graft survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.28). The HLA-AB AAMM load showed no impact on graft survival. In the subgroup with available split-level information, we observed an inferior graft survival for a higher HLA-DR AAMM load 3 months after transplantation (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.04–1.44) and a higher risk for rejection for an increasing HLA-AB (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.29–2.24) and HLA-DR (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.09–1.61) AAMM load. No impact on the development of CAV was found. Molecular-level HLA mismatch analysis could serve as a tool for risk stratification after heart transplantation and might take us one step further into precision medicine.     

Acute Renal Allograft Rejection Following Pegylated IFN-α Treatment for Chronic HCV in a Repeat Allograft Recipient on Hemodialysis: A Case Report

Interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) can be effective therapy for patients with chronic kidney disease who have chronic hepatitis C (HCV). However, acute allograft rejection has been reported in association with IFN-alpha following kidney transplantation, and therefore IFN therapy is recommended prior to, rather than after, kidney transplantation whenever feasible. The special case of repeat allograft recipients who contract HCV after the first transplantation presents special difficulties. This report features the case of a repeat allograft recipient who presented with neutropenic fevers after 5 months of pegylated IFN-alpha therapy, initiated 6 months following the functional loss of his third graft and the reinitiation of hemodialysis (HD). Physical exam, radiographic and laboratory findings led to allograft nephrectomy. The pathologic findings supported a diagnosis of acute-on-chronic rejection. This represents a rare case of IFN-alpha induced rejection following allograft failure and return to HD in a repeat allograft recipient. It also calls attention to the need for a high index of suspicion for the development of allograft rejection, which may require allograft nephrectomy even after allograft 'failure'.     

Long‐Term Follow‐Up in Composite Tissue Allotransplantation: In‐Depth Study of Five (Hand and Face) Recipients

Composite tissue allotransplantations (CTAs) have clinically shown little, if any, evidence of chronic rejection. Consequently, the effect of chronic rejection on bones, joints, nerves, muscles, tendons and vessels may still have undescribed implications. We thoroughly assessed all allograft structures by histology, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography and high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography scan in four bilateral hand‐grafted patients (10, 7, 3 and 2 years of follow‐up, respectively) and in one facial allotransplantation (5 years of follow‐up). All the recipients presented normal skin structure without dermal fibrosis. Vessels were patent, without thrombosis, stenosis or intimal hyperplasia. Tendons and nerves were also normal; muscles showed some changes, such as a variable degree of muscular hypotrophy, particularly of intrinsic muscles, accompanied by fatty degeneration that might be related to denervation. In the majority of hand‐grafted patients graft radius and recipient tibia showed a decrease in trabecular density, although in the graft radius the alterations also involved the cortices. No deterioration of graft function was noted. In these cases of CTA no signs of chronic graft rejection have been detected. However, the possibility that chronic rejection may develop in CTA exists, highlighting the necessity of close continuous follow‐up of the patients.     

Recipient Cells Form the Intimal Proliferative Lesion in the Rat Aortic Model of Allograft Arteriosclerosis

Chronic rejection is the leading cause of late graft loss following solid organ transplantation and is characterized by a vasculopathy referred to as allograft arteriosclerosis. While the etiology of allograft arteriosclerosis remains unknown, it has been hypothesized that migration of donor medial smooth muscle cells into the intimal compartment is responsible for the formation of the occlusive lesion (neointima). In this study we have used aortic interposition grafts between fully histoincompatible rat strains (Brown Norway and Lewis) to investigate the origin of the neointimal cells. Three transplant paradigms were used: BN to Lew, Lew to BN and BN to Lew with immunosuppression. Neointimal cells were isolated from aortic transplant tissue through an EDTA wash/mechanical stripping technique. We have developed polymerase chain reaction primers to the MHC1 allele that are specific to each rat strains' DNA. Polymerase chain reaction analysis, using the strain-specific primers and purified neointimal cell DNA from transplanted aortic tissue from all three experimental groups, demonstrated that the neointimal cells are of recipient, and not donor origin.     

Full facial retransplantation in a female patient—Technical,immunologic, and clinical considerations

There is limited experience with facial retransplantation (fRT). We report on the management of facial retransplantation in a facial vascularized composite allotransplant recipient following irreversible allograft loss 88 months after the first transplant. Chronic antibody-mediated rejection and recurrent cellular rejection resulted in a deteriorated first allograft and the patient underwent retransplantation. We summarize the events between the two transplantations, focusing on the final rejection episode. We describe the surgical technique of facial retransplantation, the immunological and psychosocial management, and the 6-month postoperative outcomes. Removal of the old allograft and inset of the new transplant were done in one operation. The donor and recipient were a good immunological match. The procedure was technically complex, requiring more proximal arterial anastomoses and an interposition vein graft. During the first and second transplantation, the facial nerve was coapted at the level of the branches. There was no hyperacute rejection in the immediate postoperative phase. Outcomes 6 months postoperatively are promising. We provide proof-of-concept that facial retransplantation is a viable option for patients who suffer irreversible facial vascularized composite allograft loss.     

Chronic renal allograft nephropathy

Chronic rejection/chronic allograft nephropathy is the most prevalent cause of renal graft loss after the first year post-transplant. Chronic rejection/chronic allograft nephropathy is characterized by a slow progressive deterioration of graft function, often in combination with proteinuria and hypertension. Both immunologic and non-immunologic factors play key roles in the pathogenesis of chronic allograft nephropathy. Acute rejection episodes are the most prevalent risk factor for chronic rejection. Many risk factors for chronic allograft nephropathy have been identified, such as delayed graft function, nephron-dosing mismatch, repeated acute rejection episodes, and pathologically severe rejection. However, the precise pathogenesis of chronic allograft nephropathy remains elusive. The differential diagnosis of immunologically mediated chronic rejection and chronic rejection caused by non-immunologic factors is usually not possible using clinical parameters. The histopathologic findings of chronic allograft nephropathy are progressive interstitial fibrosis and remodelling of the vascular wall, and these findings are nonspecific. However, typical chronic transplant glomerulopathy, which affects glomerular tufts, as well as the multilayering of the peritubular capillary basement membrane, are characteristic of immunologic chronic rejection. Furthermore, in long-surviving patient with an allograft treated with a potent immunosuppressive agent, a calcineurin inhibitor, two or more concomitant independent lesions often develop. Therefore, the term "chronic allograft nephropathy" may be clinically preferable to "chronic rejection" to describe the gradual decline in graft function months or years after transplantation, in the absence of a well defined mechanism of graft dysfunction. The most effective way to prevent chronic allograft nephropathy is to avoid any kind of graft damage via either immunologic or non-immunologic mechanisms. Received: April 1, 2000 / Accepted: May 2, 2000     

Chronic allograft nephropathy--biopsy findings and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is a composite term for various types of damage to a kidney transplant. We wanted to analyse its components in relation to baseline biopsy findings, transplant function, and outcome. METHODS: Among renal transplantations performed from 1985 to 1997, 156 were identified where allograft biopsies had been obtained on clinical indication 6 months after transplantation or later, baseline biopsies were available in each case and the patient's original disease was known. Time after transplantation was median 2.2 years (range 0.5-13). The biopsies were reviewed and the Banff 1997 CAN score obtained. RESULTS: All but one late biopsy showed some CAN grade, 48% grade II, and 7.5% grade III. Acute tubulointerstitial rejection was seen in 9% but vascular rejection in only 3%. Arterial wall thickening was present in 66% of the late biopsies, correlated with donor age and its presence at baseline but also with time after transplantation. The Banff CAN score and serum creatinine level were both independent predictors of further graft survival, relative risk 0.35 (confidence interval 0.15-0.82, P=0.015) for CAN grade I vs III and 0.30 (0.14-0.67, P=0.003) for serum creatinine <170 vs >250 micromol/l. Presence of arterial wall thickening had no prognostic impact. CONCLUSION: The CAN grade is predictive of further graft survival independently of the serum creatinine level. Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy are more prominent features of chronic graft damage than vascular rejection. Unspecific arterial wall thickening is partly dependent on baseline conditions and lacks prognostic impact in this late stage.     

A Single Center Experience of Abdominal Wall Graft Rejection After Combined Intestinal and Abdominal Wall Transplantation

We report our outcomes following combined intestinal and abdominal wall transplantation, focusing on the presentation and treatment of acute rejection of the abdominal wall vascularized composite allograft (VCA). Retrospective analysis of all patients with combined intestinal/VCA transplantation was undertaken. Graft abnormalities were documented photographically and biopsies taken, with histological classification of rejection according to Banff 2007 guidelines. We have performed five combined intestinal and abdominal wall transplants to date. Two patients developed erythematous, maculopapular to papular eruptions confined to the VCA, histologically confirmed as grade II/III rejection, yet with normal bowel on endoscopy. Both patients' rashes resolved within 72 h of increasing immunosuppressive treatment. One patient later developed a recurrence of the rash, confirmed as skin rejection, but did not immediately seek medical attention. Treatment was therefore delayed, and mild intestinal rejection developed. We describe the rash associated with VCA rejection, and propose that while the skin of an abdominal wall VCA may reject independently of the intestinal allograft, delay in treatment of rejection episodes may result in rejection of the intestinal graft.     

Intercalary reconstruction following resection of diaphyseal bone tumors: A systematic review

IntroductionThe options for the reconstruction of diaphyseal defects following the resection of bone tumors include biological or prosthetic implants. The purpose of our study was to evaluate different types of intercalary reconstruction techniques, including massive bone allograft, extracorporeal devitalized autograft, vascularized free fibula, and modular prosthesis.MethodsWe performed a systematic review of articles using the terms diaphyseal bone tumor and intercalary reconstruction. All the studies reporting the non-oncological complications such as infection, nonunion and fracture of the intercalary reconstructions were included. We excluded articles published before 2000 or did not involve humans in the study. Case reports, reviews, technique notes and opinion articles were also excluded based on the abstracts. Thirty-three articles included in this review were then studied to evaluate failure rates, complications and functional outcome of different surgical intercalary reconstruction techniques.ResultsNonunion rates of allograft ranged 6%–43%, while aseptic loosening rates of modular prosthesis ranged 0%–33%. Nonunion rates of allograft alone and allograft with a vascularized fibula graft ranged 6%–43% and 0%–33%, respectively. Fracture rates of allograft alone and allograft with a vascularized fibula graft ranged 7%–45% and 0%–44%, respectively. Infection rates of allograft alone and allograft with a vascularized fibula graft ranged 0%–28% and 0%–17%, respectively. All of the allograft (range: 67%–92%), extracorporeal devitalized autograft including irradiation (87%), autoclaving (70%), pasteurization (88%), low-heat (90%) or freezing with liquid nitrogen (90%), and modular prosthesis (range: 77%–93%) had similar Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional scores. Addition of a vascularized fibula graft to allograft did not affect functional outcome [allograft with a vascularized fibula graft (range: 86%–94%) vs. allograft alone (range: 67%–92%)].ConclusionAseptic loosening rates of modular prosthesis seem to be less than nonunion rates of allograft. Adding a vascularized fibula graft to allograft seems to increase bone union rate and reduce the risk of fractures and infections, though a vascularized fibula graft needs longer surgical time and has the disadvantage of donor site morbidity. These various intercalary reconstruction techniques with or without a vascularized fibula autograft had similar functional outcome.     

Liver Allograft Provides Immunoprotection for the Cardiac Allograft in Combined Heart–Liver Transplantation

When transplanted simultaneously, the liver allograft has been thought to have an immunoprotective role on other organs; however, detailed analyses in simultaneous heart–liver transplantation (SHLT) have not been done to date. We analyzed patient outcomes and incidence of immune‐mediated injury in 22 consecutive SHLT versus 223 isolated heart transplantation (IHT) recipients between January 2004 and December 2013, by reviewing 3912 protocol‐ and indication‐specific cardiac allograft biopsy specimens. Overall survival was similar (86.4%, 86.4%, and 69.1% for SHLT and 93.3%, 84.7%, and 70.0% for IHT at 1, 5, and 10 years; p = 0.83). Despite similar immunosuppression, the incidence of T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) was lower in SHLT (31.8%) than in IHT (84.8%) (p < 0.0001). Although more SHLT patients had preexisting donor‐specific HLA antibody (22.7% versus 8.1%; p = 0.04), the incidence of antibody‐mediated rejection was not different in SHLT compared with IHT (4.5% versus 14.8%, p = 0.33). While the left ventricular ejection fraction was comparable in both groups at 5 years, the incidence and severity of cardiac allograft vasculopathy were reduced in the SHLT recipients (42.9% versus 66.8%, p = 0.03). Simultaneously transplanted liver allograft was associated with reduced risk of TCMR (odds ratio [OR] 0.003, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0–0.02; p < 0.0001), antibody‐mediated rejection (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0–0.46; p = 0.004), and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.07–0.84; p = 0.02), after adjusting for other risk factors. These data suggest that the incidence of alloimmune injury in the heart allograft is reduced in SHLT recipients.     

Acute Humoral Rejection in an ABO Compatible Combined Liver–Kidney Transplant—The Kidney Is Not Always Protected

Combined liver–kidney transplantation has become a common practice for the treatment of patients with concurrent end-stage renal disease and end-stage liver disease. Liver transplantation in the setting of multiorgan transplantation is thought to have a protective effect against humoral rejection even when a positive crossmatch is obtained prior to surgery. In most centers, a pre liver–kidney transplant crossmatch is rarely performed because of the known immunoprotective effect of the liver allograft. In this report, a case of acute humoral rejection in the kidney allograft after a combined liver–kidney transplant is described. Although humoral rejection was treated using plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab, the kidney required 3 months to recover function and finally progressed to chronic allograft nephropathy. A heightened index of suspicion for acute humoral rejection of the renal allograft is necessary when performing combined liver–kidney transplants to highly sensitized patients due to previous organ transplants.     

SDF-1 expression is elevated in chronic human renal allograft rejection

The exact mechanism of acute and chronic allograft rejection still remains unclear. The chemokine SDF-1 as mediator of allograft rejection has been under intensive investigation in liver, cardiac and bone marrow transplantation, whereas in renal transplantation, there are no reports about SDF-1 to date. This study was performed to evaluate if SDF-1 might also play an important role in human renal graft biopsies. One hundred and ninety formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded renal allograft biopsies were included in the analysis from patients with normal renal graft morphology (according to Banff 97 classification grade 1, n = 84), with acute interstitial rejection (Banff grade 4 type I, n = 10), with acute vascular rejection (Banff grade 4 type II, n = 21), with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN, Banff grade 5, n = 23), and without rejection but with various other lesions (Banff grade 6, n = 42). SDF-1 was localized by immunohistochemistry. In biopsies with CAN, SDF-1 expression was significantly elevated in interstitial infiltrates and infiltrating neointimal cells of arteries compared with biopsies with normal renal graft morphology. This is the first study describing a role of SDF-1 in human renal allograft rejection. We were able to demonstrate in a large number of biopsies an upregulation of SDF-1 in patients with CAN. Whether SDF-1 has pro-inflammatory or protective properties in this setting has to be evaluated in further trials.     

Sanglifehrin A Blocks Key Dendritic Cell Functions In Vivo and Promotes Long-Term Allograft Survival Together with Low-Dose CsA

Sanglifehrin A (SFA) is a novel compound with unsurpassed cyclophilin-binding affinity, but relatively low direct antilymphocytic activity. Here, we report the capacity of SFA to selectively inhibit key dendritic cell (DC) functions in vivo and to suppress acute and chronic heart allograft rejection. We show that in vivo, SFA profoundly decreases DC receptor-mediated endocytosis and macropinocytosis and DC-T-cell allostimulatory activity. Furthermore, SFA abrogates >90% of IL-12p70 production in vivo while having no significant effect on IL-10 and TNF-alpha production. In a rat vascularized heart transplant model, SFA alone did not prevent graft rejection and rejection occurred within 23 days after low-dose CsA, whereas addition of SFA to low-dose CsA promoted long-term graft survival (median survival time >100 days; p = 0.0007). With respect to chronic rejection, SFA + CsA almost completely prevented graft arteriosclerosis compared to animals treated with CsA alone and controls. We propose that SFA represents a novel class of immunophilin-binding immunosuppressants with high activity against DCs and the development of graft vasculopathy in CsA-treated recipients.