Pharmacoeconomic assessment of therapy for invasive aspergillosis

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised hosts. Economic expenditures prompted by this invasive fungal infection (IFI) are significant. Although, the duration and associated costs of hospitalization comprise the largest proportion of costs in large surveillance studies, the newer oral antifungal agents may impact significantly on these costs. A review of the pharmacoeconomic (PE) studies is provided focussing on primary therapy, salvage therapy, empiric therapy and prophylaxis for IA. PE evaluations have demonstrated the cost effectiveness and dominance of voriconazole for targeted primary treatment of IA compared with other available agents. Differences in the drug choice and analytic methodology of the PE analyses of empiric antifungal strategy hamper definitive conclusions about the agents employed as empiric antifungal that may be directed at suspected IA although both caspofungin and voriconazole appear to be cost effective and dominant over liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB), whereas LAmB is more costly than conventional amphotericin B. Posaconazole is the most cost‐effective agent for antifungal prophylaxis against IFI and IA.     

Retrospective evaluation of caspofungin therapy in invasive aspergillosis (RECAM‐IA)

To evaluate caspofungin in high‐risk invasive aspergillosis (IA) patient, a retrospective review of patient characteristics, antifungal therapies and clinical outcomes on hospitalised patients at sites in Russia, Canada, Germany, and Thailand was performed. Fifty‐five patients were included, six with proven and 49 with probable aspergillosis; 76.4% had haematological diseases, 80% were on immunosuppressive drugs, 32.7% were neutropenic at caspofungin initiation. Median duration of prior antifungal therapy was 9 days (range 1–232). Reasons for initiating caspofungin included: disease refractory to first‐line antifungal (49.1%) and toxicities with prior antifungals (18.2%). Median caspofungin therapy duration was 14 days (range 2–62), with a median of 13 days (range 1–62) as monotherapy. Favourable responses were observed in 45.5% of the patients, complete responses in 40% and partial responses in 5.5%; 74.5% survived 7 days after completion of caspofungin therapy with 69.1% having been successfully discharged from the hospital. Few patients (14.6%) on caspofungin switched because of suspected resistance, lack of response or adverse events. There were no increases in hospital stay as a result of adverse events or drug–drug interactions related to caspofungin; 7.3% of patients had a mean value of 13 (±14.11) days of increased stay attributable to treatment failure. Caspofungin was well‐tolerated. It exhibited effectiveness and high survival in treating severe IA patients.     

Refractory Aspergillus pneumonia in patients with acute leukemia: successful therapy with combination caspofungin and liposomal amphotericin

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary aspergillosis and other invasive fungal infections (IFIs) commonly complicate the management of patients with acute leukemia. Standard amphotericin-based therapies may be ineffective for many patients and the available salvage agents (itraconazole and caspofungin) are reported to possess only moderate activity against resistant infections. Laboratory evidence suggests a synergistic interaction between amphotericin and caspofungin. The authors treated a group of patients with amphotericin-refractory IFIs with the combination of caspofungin and amphotericin (or liposomal amphotericin). METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of patients with amphotericin-resistant IFIs was conducted. Diagnosis was based on clinical, radiographic, and when available, microbiologic data. Response to combination antifungal therapy was graded as either favorable or unfavorable. Favorable responses included improvement of both clinical and radiographic signs of fungal pneumonia. All other responses were graded as unfavorable. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included in this analysis. Twenty-six patients had acute leukemia. Based on recently published criteria, the IFIs were classified as proven in 6 patients, probable in 4 patients, and possible in 20 patients. The median duration and dose of amphotericin monotherapy were 12 days (range, 4-65 days) and 7.8 mg/kg (range, 4.2-66.1 mg/kg), respectively. The median duration of combination therapy was 24 days (range, 3-74 days). Eighteen patients (60%) experienced a favorable antifungal response. Twenty patients with acute leukemia received combination therapy for fungal pneumonias arising during intensive chemotherapy treatments. Favorable responses were observed in 15 of these patients (75%), and antifungal response did not depend on the response of the underlying leukemia. Survival to hospital discharge was significantly better (P < 0.001) in patients having a favorable response. Mild to moderate nephrotoxicity was noted in 50% of patients, necessitating the substitution of liposomal amphotericin. Mild elevation of alkaline phosphatase levels occurred in 30% of patients. Caspofungin was temporarily withheld from one patient who developed moderate but reversible biochemical hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The antifungal combination of caspofungin and amphotericin can be administered safely to high-risk patients with hematologic malignancies. Although an absolute assessment of efficacy is limited by the design of this study, encouraging outcomes were noted for many patients. The authors plan to evaluate this regimen further in a randomized clinical trial.     

Multicentre surveillance study on feasibility,safety and efficacy of antifungal combination therapy for proven or probable invasive fungal diseases in haematological patients: the SEIFEM real‐life combo study

This multicentre observational study evaluated the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of antifungal combination therapy (combo) as treatment of proven or probable invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in patients with haematological malignancies. Between January 2005 and January 2010, 84 cases of IFDs (39 proven and 45 probable) treated with combo were collected in 20 Hematological Italian Centres, in patients who underwent chemotherapy or allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological diseases. Median age of patients was 34 years (range 1–73) and 37% had less than 18 years. Acute leukaemia was the most common underlying haematological disease (68/84; 81%). The phase of treatment was as follows: first induction in 21/84 (25%), consolidation phase in 18/84 (21%) and reinduction/salvage in 45/84 (54%). The main site of infection was lung with or without other sites. The principal fungal pathogens were as follows: Aspergillus sp. 68 cases (81%), Candida sp. six cases (8%), Zygomycetes four cases (5%) and Fusarium sp. four cases (5%). The most used combo was caspofungin+voriconazole 35/84 (42%), caspofungin + liposomal amphotericin B (L‐AmB) 20/84 (24%) and L‐AmB+voriconazole 15/84 (18%). The median duration of combo was 19 days (range 3–180). The overall response rate (ORR) was 73% (61/84 responders) without significant differences between the combo regimens. The most important factor that significantly influenced the response was granulocyte (PMN) recovery (P 0.009). Only one patient discontinued therapy (voriconazole‐related neurotoxicity) and 22% experienced mild and reversible adverse events (hypokalaemia, ALT/AST increase and creatinine increase). The IFDs‐attributable mortality was 17%. This study indicates that combo was both well tolerated and effective in haematological patients. The most used combo regimens were caspofungin + voriconazole (ORR 80%) and caspofungin + L‐AmB (ORR 70%). The ORR was 73% and the mortality IFD related was 17%. PMN recovery during combo predicts a favourable outcome. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00906633.     

Empirical caspofungin therapy in clinical practice for suspected invasive fungal disease in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) after cytotoxic chemotherapy or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are at risk for life‐threatening invasive fungal disease (IFD). The aim was to evaluate the characteristics, antifungal therapy and outcome of adult patients with ALL after chemotherapy or HSCT receiving caspofungin empirically in a clinical setting. Retrospective chart reviews were conducted at nine large tertiary care centres in Germany. Adult patients with ALL treated empirically with caspofungin according to the product label between 2006 and 2012 were eligible. Data were extracted as case reports. In total, 25 patients (12 males, 13 females; median age 37 years; 19 with B‐ALL, 6 with T‐ALL) with 28 treatment episodes because of suspected IFD (18 episodes after chemotherapy, 10 episodes after allogeneic HSCT) were included in the analysis. Empirical caspofungin therapy (median duration: 19 days, range 1–105 days) was given as first‐line monotherapy in 20 (71.4%), second‐line monotherapy in five (17.9%) and combination therapy in three (10.7%) episodes respectively. Therapy rated successful according to the physician's overall assessment (inflammatory parameters, clinical symptoms): 20 (95%) of 21 evaluable episodes with therapy duration of at least 8 days. Empirical caspofungin appears to be an effective therapeutic option in critically ill adult ALL patients with suspected IFD in clinical practice.     

Serum posaconazole levels during acute myeloid leukaemia induction therapy: correlations with breakthrough invasive fungal infections

The usefulness of posaconazole therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is still a matter of debate. A correlation between posaconazole serum levels and breakthrough invasive fungal infections (IFI) has not been clearly demonstrated so far. We analysed posaconazole serum levels in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) during induction therapy and correlated them with the incidence of breakthrough IFI and the need of systemic antifungal therapy. Overall, 77 AML patients receiving posaconazole were evaluated for serum levels; breakthrough IFI were observed in five with at least one posaconazole TDM (6.5%). Median serum level was 534 ng ml^?1 (IQ range: 298.5–750.5 ng ml^?1) and did not change significantly over time. Four of the 40 patients with median posaconazole levels <500 ng ml^?1 developed IFI, as compared with only 1 of the 37 patients with median levels ≥500 (10% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.19). Median posaconazole levels on day 7 were 384.5 ng ml^?1 (IQ range: 207–659 ng ml^?1) and 560.5 ng ml^?1 (IQ range: 395–756 ng ml^?1) in patients requiring or not systemic antifungal treatment respectively (P = 0.067). These results seem to confirm that higher median serum levels of posaconazole correlate with higher prophylactic efficacy against proven/probable IFI and with lesser need of systemic antifungal therapy.     

Invasive fungal infections in AML/MDS patients treated with azacitidine: a risk worth considering antifungal prophylaxis?

The aim of this study is to analyse the risk of invasive fungal infection (IFI) and the need for antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndromes (AML/MDS) treated with azacitidine. We retrospectively analysed the incidence of IFI according to EORTC‐MSG criteria in 121 consecutive AML/MDS patients receiving 948 azacitidine courses (median 5, range 1–43) between June 2007 and June 2015. Four cases of IFI (two possible, one probable aspergillosis and one proven candidemia) occurred in this series. The incidence rate of proven/probable IFI was 0.21% per treatment cycle and 1.6% per patient treated for the whole series, and 0.73% per treatment cycle and 4.1% per patient treated in those with severe neutropenia. Two patients died from IFI, leading to an IFI‐attributable mortality rate of 1.65% per patient and 0.21% per treatment cycle. The numbers needed to treat with prophylaxis to prevent one case of IFI are 238 azacitidine cycles or 30 patients throughout their whole treatment course, and 137 azacitidine cycles or 24 patients among those with severe neutropenia. AML/MDS patients treated with azacitidine, including those with severe prolonged neutropenia, have a very low risk of IFI which does not justify the use of antifungal prophylaxis.     

Diagnosis of invasive fungal infections using real-time PCR assay in paediatric acute leukaemia induction

Invasive fungal infections (IFI) lead to morbidity and mortality in neutropenic patients and in allogenic stem cell transplantation. Serum-based fungal detection assays have limitation of specificity or sensitivity. Studies on fungal DNA detection using real-time PCR in childhood leukaemia are lacking. The aim of this study was to develop sensitive and specific diagnostic tools for IFI in paediatric acute leukaemia patients using real-time PCR. Of 100 randomised paediatric acute leukaemia patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis with voriconazole/amphotericin B, single peripheral whole blood sample in EDTA was used for Pan-AC real-time PCR assay (detects nine Candida and six Aspergillus species) in patients who failed prophylaxis due to proven, probable, possible or suspected fungal infections. PCR results were retrospectively correlated with clinical profile. Real-time PCR test was positive in 18/29 (62%) patients who failed prophylaxis. The only patient with proven IFI (mucormycosis), real-time PCR assay was negative. Real-time PCR was positive in 2/4 (50%) patients with possible and 16/24 (66.6%) suspected IFI and 5/10 (50%) patients with pneumonia. By applying method A/B, sensitivity and positive predictive value could not be commented due to unproven Aspergillus or Candida infections; specificity and negative predictive values (NPV) were 41% and 100% respectively; by method C (included episodes of possible IFI as true positive), sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 50%, 36%, 11% and 81% respectively. In those with suspected IFI, 8/24 (33.3%) were PCR negative and unnecessarily received empirical antifungal therapy (EAFT). Real-time PCR is a practical, rapid, non-invasive screening test for excluding IFI in paediatric leukaemia. The high NPV makes real-time PCR a promising tool to use this prior to initiating EAFT in antibiotic-resistant febrile neutropenic patients; this would avoid toxicity, cost and hospitalisation for EAFT (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT00624143).     

Utilization of posaconazole oral suspension or delayed‐released tablet salvage treatment for invasive fungal infection

Posaconazole may be useful for salvage treatment (ST) for invasive fungal infections (IFIs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of posaconazole ST with either posaconazole oral suspension (SUS) or delayed‐released tablet (TAB) in patients with IFI. A retrospective review of patients who received posaconazole ST for IFI at the University of Utah Health Sciences Center between December 2007 and March 2014 was conducted. A total of 14 episodes of posaconazole ST for proven (9 episodes) and probable (5 episodes) IFI were identified in 14 patients. The median age was 54 years and the majority of patients (64.3%) had underlying haematological diseases. Posaconazole SUS and TAB were used in 11 episodes and 3 episodes respectively. The duration of posaconazole ST ranged from 28 to 370 days with a median of 65 days. Posaconazole ST with TAB achieved favourable serum posaconazole trough concentrations (median 1.4 μg mL^?1) compared to posaconazole SUS (median 1.0 μg mL^?1). The overall clinical success rate with posaconazole ST was 71.4% (10 of 14 episodes). One patient died of progression of IFI. Adverse events were noted in two patients. Posaconazole SUS or TAB may be used effectively for IFI ST.     

Epidemiology of invasive fungal infections and rationale for antifungal therapy in patients with haematological malignancies

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in patients with haematological malignancies are difficult to diagnose and outcome is often fatal. Over the 7‐month study period, 117 cases with haematological malignancies receiving systemic antifungal treatment were included. Data regarding antifungal agents, dosage and reason for administration were recorded. Fungal infections in study patients were classified as possible, probable or proven according to recent European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. During the study period, 690 cases with haematological malignancies were admitted. A total of 117 cases received systemic antifungal therapy. Twenty‐four of 117 patients (21%) had possible, six (5.1%) had probable and four (3.4%) had proven IFI. Seven of 10 probable and proven infections were caused by Candida spp., 2 by Aspergillus spp. and 1 by a fungus belonging to Zygomycetes. Fifty‐two of 117 patients (44%) received antifungal prophylaxis, 81 of 117 (69%) received empirical (31/117; 26%) or pre‐emptive (50/117; 43%) antifungal therapy and four of 117 patients (3.4%) directed antifungal therapy. Mostly, systemic antifungal therapy was administered empirically or pre‐emptively. Twenty‐nine per cent of cases receiving systemic antifungal treatment met the international consensus criteria of mostly possible IFI, whereas 71% did not. Proven invasive fungal infections were rare.     

Haemopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in patients with previous history of invasive fungal infection

The aim of this retrospective study conducted between H.U.Marques de Valdecilla (Spain) and the Royal Marsden NHS Trust (UK) was to analyse the outcome of patients who underwent haemopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (HPCT) after a previous history of Invasive fungal infections (IFI). This study includes 27 patients (15 autologous, 12 allogeneic). The diagnosis of IFI was microbiologically proven in 21 cases and only radiologically in six. Pre-HPCT treatment included intravenous antifungals in all and surgical excision in eight cases. All patients received post-HPCT antifungal prophylaxis. Median time from diagnosis of IFI to HPCT was 131 days. At median follow-up of 193 days, three patients (two allogeneic, one autologous) had relapse of IFI resulting in death in all cases. One of them had received TBI and two were receiving treatment for graft versus host disease. Each patient was receiving a different form of prophylaxis. Overall, seven patients are alive and disease-free. Ten patients died from disease progression and 10 from transplant-related toxicity, including IFI. In our experience, the risk of post-HPCT reactivation of a previous IFI is low (11%), so IFI should not be an absolute contraindication for HPCT. The combination of aggressive antifungal treatment for IFI and antifungal prophylaxis throughout HPCT reduces the probability of reactivation.     

Economic evaluation of azoles as primary prophylaxis for the prevention of invasive fungal infections in Spanish patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant

Patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) are at risk of developing invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Even with introduction of oral triazole antifungal agents (fluconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole) IFI‐associated morbidity and mortality rates and economic burden remain high. Despite their proven efficacy, it is currently unknown which is the most cost‐effective antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) agent. To determine the costs and outcomes associated with AFP, a decision‐analytic model was used to simulate treatment in a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients undergoing alloHSCT from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. Generic itraconazole was the least costly AFP (€162) relative to fluconazole (€500), posaconazole oral suspension (€8628) or voriconazole (€6850). Compared with posaconazole, voriconazole was associated with the lowest number of breakthrough IFIs (36 vs 60); thus, the model predicted fewer deaths from breakthrough IFI for voriconazole (24) than posaconazole (33), and the lowest predicted costs associated with other licensed antifungal treatment and IFI treatment in a cohort of 1000. Voriconazole resulted in cost savings of €4707 per patient compared with posaconazole. Itraconazole demonstrated a high probability of being cost‐effective. As primary AFP in alloHSCT patients 180 days posttransplant, voriconazole was more likely to be cost‐effective than posaconazole regarding cost per additional IFI and additional death avoided.     

Multicenter, noncomparative study of caspofungin in combination with other antifungals as salvage therapy in adults with invasive aspergillosis

BACKGROUND: Caspofungin inhibits synthesis of beta-1,3-glucan, an essential component of the Aspergillus cell wall. This echinocandin has demonstrated efficacy (45% success) as salvage monotherapy of invasive aspergillosis (IA). Interest remains as to whether caspofungin, in combination with other antifungal classes, can improve the efficacy against IA. METHODS: The study involved 53 adults with documented IA who were refractory to or intolerant of standard antifungal therapy and received caspofungin and 1 other mold-active antifungal agent (at the investigator's discretion). Efficacy was assessed by signs, symptoms, and radiographs at the end of combination therapy and Day 84 after combination therapy initiation. Favorable (complete or partial) responses required significant clinical and radiographic improvement. Diagnoses and outcomes were assessed by an independent expert. RESULTS: Among the 53 patients enrolled the most common underlying diseases were acute leukemia (53%), lymphoma (11%), and chronic leukemia (6%). Pulmonary aspergillosis (81%) was the most common site, and most patients (87%) were refractory to prior therapy. Success at the end of combination therapy and Day 84 was 55% (29/53) and 49% (25/51), respectively. Fifty-seven percent of patients with neutropenia and 54% who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant responded favorably. Survival at Day 84 was 55%. Combination therapy, dosed on average for 31.3 days, was well tolerated. Two (4%) serious drug-related adverse events, both attributed to voriconazole, occurred. None of the patients discontinued caspofungin due to toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Caspofungin in combination with a triazole or polyene was an effective alternative as salvage therapy for patients with recalcitrant Aspergillus infections.     

Empirical antifungal therapy for patients with neutropenia and persistent fever: Systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectivesTo assess the evidence for the current standard of practice of using empirical antifungal treatment in febrile neutropenic cancer patients.MethodsSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing empirical or preemptive antifungal treatment with placebo, no intervention, or another antifungal. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and invasive fungal infections (IFI) (documented or probable). Relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled.ResultsSix trials assessed the efficacy of empirical treatment compared to no treatment and one compared empirical to preemptive therapy. Empirical treatment did not decrease mortality significantly (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.50–1.34), but significantly decreased IFIs (RR 0.25, 0.12–0.54). Twenty-three trials assessed the efficiency of different antifungals. All-cause mortality was lower with azoles compared to amphotericin B (AB) (RR 0.81, 0.65–1.01); IFI rates were not different while adverse events were less frequent with azoles (RR 0.40; 0.34–0.66). Liposomal AB was associated with lower mortality and IFIs than other AB formulations (RR 1.57, 1.10–2.23 and 1.48, 0.98–2.25, respectively). Caspofungin was associated with fewer adverse events, but otherwise comparable to liposomal AB. All trials included patients with haematological malignancies. Major limitations included per-protocol analysis, non-blinded design and inconsistent definitions of IFIs.ConclusionsEmpirical antifungal treatment is associated with a lower rate of IFIs but no significant difference in overall mortality. The assessment of IFIs in these trials may have been biased, offering only weak support to standard practice. Azoles, liposomal amphotericin B or caspofungin should be preferred. Pre-emptive antifungal therapy should be considered and further investigated.     

Fungal infections of the central nervous system and paranasal sinuses in onco‐haematologic patients. Epidemiological study reporting the diagnostic‐therapeutic approach and outcome in 89 cases

Invasive fungal infections (IFI) of the Central Nervous System (IFI‐CNS) and Paranasal Sinuses (IFI‐PS) are rare, life‐threatening infections in haematologic patients, and their management remains a challenge despite the availability of new diagnostic techniques and novel antifungal agents. In addition, analyses of large cohorts of patients focusing on these rare IFI are still lacking. Between January 2010 and December 2016, 89 consecutive cases of Proven (53) or Probable (36) IFI‐CNS (71/89) and IFI‐PS (18/89) were collected in 34 haematological centres. The median age was 40 years (range 5‐79); acute leukaemia was the most common underlying disease (69%) and 29% of cases received a previous allogeneic stem cell transplant. Aspergillus spp. were the most common pathogens (69%), followed by mucormycetes (22%), Cryptococcus spp. (4%) and Fusarium spp. (2%). The lung was the primary focus of fungal infection (48% of cases). The nervous system biopsy was performed in 10% of IFI‐CNS, and a sinus biopsy was performed in 56% of IFI‐PS (P = 0.03). The Galactomannan test on cerebrospinal fluid has been performed in 42% of IFI‐CNS (30/71), and it was positive in 67%. Eighty‐four pts received a first‐line antifungal therapy with Amphotericine B in 58% of cases, Voriconazole in 31% and both in 11%. Moreover, 58% of patients received 2 or more lines of therapy and 38% were treated with a combination of 2 or more antifungal drugs. The median duration of antifungal therapy was 60 days (range 5‐835). A surgical intervention was performed in 26% of cases but only 10% of IFI‐CNS underwent neurosurgical intervention. The overall response rate to antifungal therapy (complete or partial response) was 57%, and 1‐year overall survival was 32% without significant differences between IFI‐CNS and IFI‐PS. The overall mortality was 69% but the IFI attributable mortality was 33%. Mortality of IFI‐CNS/PS remains high but, compared to previous historical data, it seems to be reduced probably due to the availability of newer antifungal drugs. The results arising from this large contemporary cohort of cases may allow a more effective diagnostic and therapeutic management of these very rare IFI complications in haematologic patients.     

Hospital costs and outcomes among intravenous antifungal therapies for patients with invasive aspergillosis in the United States

This study determined the economic burden of aspergillosis‐related hospitalisations in the United States during years when new antifungal treatments were introduced. A retrospective observational cohort study from the hospital perspective was conducted using national administrative data from the Premier Perspective? Database. Patients (n = 1603) coded for infection caused by Aspergillus species during 1835 admissions who received at least 3 days of intravenous antifungal therapy between 2000 and 2006 were included. All costs were inflated to $US 2006. Length of stay, hospital costs and mortality were compared after stratification by initial antifungal therapy. Median hospital costs were $52 803 (25 929–100 730) and did not differ by year over the study period. Intravenous antifungals accounted for 7.2% (range: 0.78–15.9%) of the cost of aspergillosis‐related hospitalisation. Crude mortality was 36.7% and was the lowest in the last 2 years of the study (2005, 2006). Although antifungal utilisation changed over the course of the study, initial antifungal choice was not independently associated with crude mortality. In contrast, initial therapy with intravenous voriconazole was associated with reduced total hospitalisation costs and length of hospital stay. Treatment with amphotericin B lipid complex or caspofungin was also independently associated with a reduced length of hospital stay. In this large US study, mortality and costs for aspergillosis‐related hospitalisations were considerable, but antifungals accounted for a small percentage of total costs associated with treatment and did not independently affect in‐hospital crude mortality. Only initial treatment with intravenous voriconazole was associated with reduced total hospitalisation costs.     

Adverse interactions between antifungal azoles and vincristine: review and analysis of cases

Triazole and imidazole antifungal agents inhibit metabolism of vincristine, leading to excess vinca alkaloid exposure and severe neurotoxicity. Recent reports of debilitating interactions between vincristine and itraconazole, as well as posaconazole, voriconazole and ketoconazole underscore the need to improve medical awareness of this adverse combination. We, therefore, undertook a comprehensive analysis of reports of adverse drug interactions (ADIs) with the combination of vincristine and azole antifungal agents, established a new classification, and provided a detailed summary of these toxicities. In patients who had sufficient data for analysis, 47 individuals were identified who had an ADI with the combination of vincristine and antifungal azoles. Median age was 8 years (1.3–68 years) with 33(70%) having a diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Median time to ADI with vincristine was 9.5 days with itraconazole, 13.5 days posaconazole and 30 days voriconazole. The median number of vincristine doses preceding the ADI was 2 doses with itraconazole, 3 doses posaconazole and 2 doses voriconazole. The most common severe ADIs included gastrointestinal toxicity, peripheral neuropathy, hyponatremia/SIADH, autonomic neuropathy and seizures. Recovery from these ADIs occurred in 80.6% of patients. We recommend using alternative antifungal agents if possible in patients receiving vincristine to avoid this serious and potentially life‐threatening drug interaction.     

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of voriconazole vs. caspofungin in the empirical antifungal therapy of febrile neutropenia in Australia

In two major clinical trials, voriconazole and caspofungin were recommended as alternatives to liposomal amphotericin B for empirical use in febrile neutropenia. This study investigated the health economic impact of using voriconazole vs. caspofungin in patients with febrile neutropenia. A decision analytic model was developed to measure downstream consequences of empirical antifungal therapy. Clinical outcomes measured were success, breakthrough infection, persistent base-line infection, persistent fever, premature discontinuation and death. Treatment transition probabilities and patterns were directly derived from data in two relevant randomised controlled trials. Resource use was estimated using an expert clinical panel. Cost inputs were obtained from latest Australian sources. The analysis adopted the perspective of the Australian hospital system. The use of caspofungin led to a lower expected mean cost per patient than voriconazole (AU$40,558 vs. AU$41,356), with a net cost saving of AU$798 (1.9%) per patient. Results were most sensitive to the duration of therapy and the alternative therapy used post-discontinuation. In uncertainty analysis, the cost associated with caspofungin is less than that with voriconazole in 65.5% of cases. This is the first economic evaluation of voriconazole vs. caspofungin for empirical therapy. Caspofungin appears to have a higher probability of having cost-savings than voriconazole for empirical therapy. The difference between the two medications does not seem to be statistically significant however.     

The role of surgery in the treatment of invasive fungal infection in paediatric haematology patients: a retrospective single‐centre survey

Surgery may improve the control of fungal disease and patient survival. The aim of this study was to report a single‐centre experience in using surgery for the treatment of paediatric invasive fungal infection (IFI). From 2001 to 2009, 18 paediatric onco‐haematology patients underwent 24 surgical procedures as treatment of IFI. At surgery, severe thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were present in four and one episodes respectively. Complications were one pleural effusion, one pleural effusion and surgical wound infection, one pneumothorax with wound dehiscence and one wound dehiscence. None of them required repeat surgery. The median duration of hospitalisation for four complicated procedures was 11 days, range 3–16, and 7 days, range 2–13, for the 20 uncomplicated procedures. No surgery‐related deaths occurred. Fourteen patients resumed chemotherapy after a median of 26 days, range 9–77, whereas nine patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after a median of 42 days, range 27–110. At 3 months from IFI, 17 patients were alive (94%) and one patient (6%) died from mycosis; the 3‐month overall survival (OS) being 94.4%, CI 66.6–99.2. After a median follow‐up of 7.1 years (CI 2.8–7.5), the OS was 54.5%, CI 29.2–74.2. Surgery is a feasible and valuable option in paediatric patients because it is associated with a low incidence of complications and an acceptable delay in resuming the chemotherapeutic plan.     

Low-dose liposomal amphotericin B in the prevention of invasive fungal infections in patients with prolonged neutropenia: results from a randomized, single-center trial.

BACKGROUND: We performed a prospective, randomized, open-label trial to evaluate the efficacy of low-dose liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) to reduce the incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFI) in patients with hematological malignancies and prolonged neutropenia (>10 days) following intensive chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 219 neutropenic episodes (NE) of 132 patients randomization was performed. Patients received either 50 mg L-AmB every other day (arm A) or no systemic antifungal prophylaxis (arm B). RESULTS: In the first NE of each patient the incidence of proven or probable IFI (primary end point) was five of 75 patients (6.7%) in arm A and 20 of 57 patients (35%) in arm B (P=0.001). Invasive aspergillosis occurred less frequently in patients receiving L-AmB-prophylaxis (P=0.0057), whereas the reduction of invasive candidiasis did not reach statistical significance (P=0.0655). In all NE the incidence of IFI was five of 110 NE (4.6%) in arm A versus 22 of 109 NE (20.2%) in arm B (P<0.01). Adverse events, possibly related to L-AmB, were observed in five NE (4.6%) and L-AmB was discontinued in three NE (2.8%). No grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Antifungal prophylaxis with low-dose L-AmB proved to be feasible and effective in our trial.