Lactitol vs. lactulose in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients: a double-blind, randomized trial

Lactitol (beta-galactosido-sorbitol) is a nonabsorbable disaccharide available as a powder which, in open comparison, is as effective as lactulose in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy, but is better tolerated. Twenty-five cirrhotic patients experiencing 28 episodes of acute hepatic encephalopathy were randomized blindly to treatment with either lactitol (n = 15) or lactulose (n = 13). The sugars were dispensed in solutions identical in appearance, taste and pH and of similar osmolarity, which contained either 66.7 gm per 100 ml lactitol or 66.7 ml (44.5 gm) per 100 ml lactulose syrup. The initial dose of 0.75 ml per kg was adjusted to produce two semisoft stools per day. Patients were assessed every 12 hr for 5 days. There were no significant differences in sex ratio, age, body weight, clinical status, duration and extent of coma, etiology of liver disease or of hepatic encephalopathy between the two groups of patients on entry to the trial. An adequate catharsis was obtained with an equivalent mean (+/- 1 S.D.) daily dose of 26 +/- 5 gm lactitol or 31 +/- 7 ml (21 +/- 5 gm) lactulose syrup. During the trial, significant improvements occurred in clinical status and psychometric performance and in the electroencephalogram mean cycle frequencies in the majority of patients in both groups. At the end of the trial, 67% of the patients in the lactitol group and 69% of the lactulose group were clinically normal. However, patients treated with lactitol responded significantly more quickly than patients treated with lactulose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Lactitol in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy--a randomized cross-over comparison with lactulose

The effect of lactitol, a new non-absorbable disaccharide, in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy was assessed in 14 cirrhotic patients with non-selective portosystemic anastomosis in a randomized, cross-over study. At the time of inclusion, all patients showed alterations in mental state, and/or psychometric performance, and in the electroencephalogram. Moreover, 10 out of 14 patients suffered from recurrent episodes of hepatic encephalopathy in the 12 months prior to the study. Patients were randomly treated for two consecutive periods of six months with either lactitol or lactulose. The PSE index was calculated to quantify the neuro-psychiatric impairment. Twelve patients completed the study. The patients required a daily dose of 38.2 g +/- 19 of lactulose or 36.3 g +/- 5 of lactitol to produce two semi-soft stools per day. No deterioration in the mental state or in the other neuro-psychiatric parameters were observed, neither during lactitol nor during lactulose therapy. During the study, mild episodes of recurrent encephalopathy occurred in 60% of the patients taking lactulose, and in 25% of the patients taking lactitol, the difference not being significant (X = 1.54, p = 0.21). Flatulence, the major side-effect noted during the study, was present in 7 of the 12 patients during lactulose treatment, and in 2 patients during lactitol treatment; one patient on lactitol complained of nausea. The side effects which occurred during lactitol of the dosage, while those occurring during lactitol appeared when the dosage was higher than 40 g. Lactitol may be considered at least as effective as lactulose in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy.     

Lactitol versus lactulose in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy. A double-blind, randomised, cross-over study

Lactitol is a disaccharide analogue of lactulose which is available as a pure crystalline powder. The efficacy of lactitol in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy was assessed in 9 cirrhotic patients in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over comparison with lactulose. The sugars were dispensed in solutions, identical in taste and appearance and with similar physico-chemical properties, which contained either 66.7 g/100 ml of lactitol or 66.7 ml (44.5 g)/100 ml of lactulose syrup. Patients were treated for periods of 3 months with each sugar, during which time they were monitored frequently by use of a number of clinical, psychometric and laboratory variables. The sugar solutions were dispensed in an initial dose of 0.75 ml/kg which was adjusted, as necessary, in order to produce two semi-soft stools per day. An adequate catharsis was achieved with a mean (+/- 1 SD) equivalent daily dose of 31.9 +/- 11.2 g of lactitol or 32.9 +/- 16.7 ml (21.9 +/- 11.1 g) of lactulose syrup. Both sugars were equally as effective in the treatment of this condition, even though events likely to cause decompensation arose in 5 patients during treatment with lactitol but in only 1 during treatment with lactulose. Side effects appeared to be more frequent during treatment with lactulose, despite the fact that the parent sugar was diluted in the trial solution; thus 5 patients experienced excessive flatulence and 8 experienced diarrhoea on lactulose compared with only 2 and 4 on lactitol, respectively. In all cases the excessive flatulence occurred independently of sugar dosage whereas the development of diarrhoea was dose-related.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Lactitol in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy: an open comparison with lactulose.

Lactulose is currently the drug of choice for the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. It is, however, only available as a syrup which is contaminated with other sugars. Consequently patients may express aversion to its excessively sweet taste and many experience nausea because of its hyperosmolarity. Lactitol is a disaccharide analogue of lactulose which can be produced as a pure crystalline powder with a low relative sweetness. Theoretically it should have the same therapeutic effects as lactulose but fewer side effects. Five patients with chronic hepatic encephalopathy on maintenance lactulose were monitored clinically, psychometrically, and by measurement of venous blood ammonia, electroencephalogram mean cycle frequency, and cerebral blood flow during three months treatment with lactulose and a similar period on lactitol. Lactitol was at least as efficacious as lactulose but was more acceptable because its cathartic effect was more predictable, its formulation was more convenient and its less sweet taste preferred. Lactitol is the ideal successor to lactulose for treatment of this condition.     

Comparative modes of action of lactitol and lactulose in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy.

Lactitol, an unabsorbed sugar with defined laxative threshold and superior taste properties has been suggested as an alternative to lactulose in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. In the present study we have compared the colonic metabolism of the two sugars using an in vitro faecal incubation system. Both sugars were readily metabolised by faecal bacteria producing volatile fatty acids and the metabolism was inhibited by neomycin. The effect of lactitol and lactulose on terminal ileal and colonic pH was monitored in six normal subjects using a radiotelemetry technique. Both sugars significantly lowered right colonic pH (basal -6.51 +/- 0.48 vs lactitol -5.63 +/- 0.50; lactulose -5.18 +/- 0.82, p less than 0.05). The pH of rest of the colon and terminal ileum was unaffected. Neomycin given concurrently with lactulose abolished acidification of right colon. As lactitol and lactulose have similar effects within the colon, lactitol would appear to have a role in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. As neomycin antagonises the effect of lactulose in the colon, its concurrent use may be less effective in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy.     

Lactitol or lactulose in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy: results of a meta-analysis.

Lactitol (beta-galactosido-sorbitol) has been recently compared with lactulose for the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy in a few studies, each comprising a small number of patients. The results are controversial. We studied the efficiency and tolerance of both compounds by using a meta-analysis on the basis of published controlled trials. Our study only included controlled or randomized trials comprising cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatic encephalopathy. Analyzed parameters were the portosystemic encephalopathy index of Conn after treatment, the percentage of improved patients and the percentage of patients who had ill effects related to the treatment (flatulence, diarrhea). Bibliographical screening revealed five studies comparing the effects of lactitol and lactulose in chronic hepatic encephalopathy. Four crossover studies were done that included 48 patients and one parallel study that included 29 patients. The duration of the treatment ranged from 3 to 6 mo. All studies found a similar efficiency with both drugs. However, they exhibited some discrepancies in the relative frequency of adverse reactions (flatulence). Meta-analysis showed no statistical differences in the portosystemic encephalopathy index after lactitol or lactulose treatment. The percentage of improved patients after lactitol or lactulose was similar. In contrast, the analysis revealed a higher frequency (p less than 0.01) of flatulence in patients treated with lactulose compared with those treated with lactitol. In conclusion, this meta-analysis shows no statistical difference between therapeutic effects of lactitol and lactulose, but it does show a higher frequency of flatulence with lactulose. This suggests that lactitol should be preferred to lactulose for the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy.     

Lactitol in treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy

The efficacy and side effects of lactitol in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy was compared to that of other disaccharides in a meta-analysis of published randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The outcomes assessed were: (1) the rate of patients free from episodes of clinically detectable encephalopathy, and (2) the rate of patients free from one or more side effects in the different treatment groups. Four RCTs were eligible for analysis; in three lactitol was compared to lactulose, in one the alternative treatment was lactose in lactase-deficient patients. The methodological quality of these studies was high. Meta-analysis showed that lactitol was as effective as other disaccharides in the treatment of encephalopathy: pooled odds ratio was 0.83, 95% confidence interval was 0.38–1.82. Results were not sensitive to the use of alternative methods of counting and attributing events in these trials. Patients experienced fewer side effects during treatment with lactitol, but the pooled odds ratio was not statistically significant. In all studies lactitol was considered more palatable. Clinical effectiveness of lactitol, in long-term treatment of chronic encephalopathy, is similar to those of lactulose. It seems that lactitol has lower side effects than lactulose. Future RCTs with a double-blind design could be mainly aimed at evaluating the side-effect profile of the two disaccharides.This work was supported by grants from the Zyma S. A.     

Lactitol vs. lactulose in the treatment of chronic recurrent portal-systemic encephalopathy

To compare the efficacy and patient acceptability of lactitol vs. lactulose in chronic recurrent portal-systemic encephalopathy (PSE), 25 cirrhotic patients with a history of repeated episodes of hepatic encephalopathy who required chronic administration of lactulose were included in a controlled cross-over clinical trial in which patients received, at random, lactitol (at an initial dosage of 10 g/6 h) or lactulose (15 ml/6 h, 66% w/v, containing 10 g of lactulose) during a 3 month period and then crossed-over to the alternative treatment for the following 3 months. Doses were adjusted to obtain two bowel movements per day. During the study period the daily protein intake was 40-60 g. Clinical and analytical data (including ammonia levels) were obtained, an EEG and the number connection test were performed and the PSE index was determined before treatment and monthly until the end of the treatment. No significant differences were found between the effects of lactitol and lactulose on the neurological and biological parameters, suggesting that the two treatments could be considered as equally effective. Lactitol was significantly better tolerated than lactulose (P = 0.02), the taste of which was assessed as being too sweet and provoking nausea. In conclusion, lactitol is a good alternative to lactulose for patients with chronic recurrent PSE, especially in those who do not tolerate the excessive sweetness of lactulose.     

Lactitol versus lactulose in the treatment of acute portal systemic encephalopathy (PSE): A controlled trial

Preliminary data suggest that lactitol (beta-galactoside-sorbitol), a new synthetic non-absorbable disaccharide, has beneficial effects on chronic portal systemic encephalopathy. To compare the efficacy of lactitol vs. lactulose in the treatment of acute portal systemic encephalopathy (PSE), 40 cirrhotic patients with an acute episode of PSE were randomly allocated to one of two groups: group A (20 patients) received lactulose (30 ml/6 h) and group B (20 patients) lactitol (12 g/6 h). These doses were adjusted daily to obtain two bowel movements per day. The duration of treatment was 5 days. Age, sex, hepatic and renal function, precipitating factors and level of PSE measured by clinical examination, EEG and number connection test were similar in the two groups. A complete clinical resolution of PSE occurred in 11 patients in each group. In 5 patients of the lactulose group and in 6 of the lactitol group there was a moderate improvement of PSE during the study. Finally, 4 patients in the lactulose group and 3 in the lactitol group did not respond to treatment. No side effects attributable to therapy were observed in either group. These results indicate that lactitol is as effective as lactulose in the management of patients with cirrhosis and acute PSE.     

Helicobacter pylori infection, plasma ammonia levels, and psychometric testing in cirrhotic patients

OBJECTIVE: The role of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection as a cause of hepatic encephalopathy is still debated. This study focused on the relationship between H. pylori, plasma ammonia levels, and intellectual function in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Forty-seven cirrhotics with latent or mild hepatic encephalopathy were enrolled in the study, upon H. pylori assessment at endoscopy. Plasma ammonia level determinations and psychometric testing were performed at entry in all patients. Patients with H. pylori infection received a 2-wk standard dual therapy and bacterial eradication was assessed at endoscopy 6-8 wk later. On this occasion, plasma ammonia levels and psychometric assessments were repeated. Patients without H. pylori infection at entry were also studied after 6-8 wk for ammonia level assessment and psychometric testing, as a control group. Patients receiving lactulose therapy and those without therapy were grouped separately for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Among 21 patients without lactulose therapy (group A), basal plasma ammonia levels and psychometric testing scores did not significantly differ between 13 infected and eight uninfected patients. Similarly, among 26 patients undergoing lactulose therapy (group B), basal plasma ammonia concentration and psychometric testing scores did not significantly differ between 13 infected and 13 uninfected patients. Moreover, in group B, both the prevalence of previous overt hepatic encephalopathy episodes and the mean daily dose of lactulose therapy were similar between infected and uninfected patients. In addition, no significant reduction in the plasma ammonia concentrations and in psychometric testing scores emerged in both groups A and B after bacterial eradication. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to find a relationship between H. pylori, plasma ammonia levels, and psychometric testing scores in cirrhotic patients with latent or mild hepatic encephalopathy.     

乳果糖治疗肝性脑病和亚临床肝性脑病149例临床观察

目的 进一步评估乳果糖对肝硬化肝性脑病和亚临床肝性脑病的疗效。方法 观察乳果糖治疗前后患者的精神状态、扑翼状震颤、脑电图、静脉血氨浓度和数字连接试验的改善情况。结果 乳果糖对肝性脑病组的脑病表现总有效率达96.5％,治疗前后静脉血氨浓度和数字连接试验的改善均有非常显著性差异(P<0.01);亚临床肝性脑病组治疗前后血氨有非常显著性差异(P<0.01),数字连接试验有显著性差异(P<0.05)。在乳果糖治疗观察期间,无一例亚临床肝性脑病患者发展为肝性脑病。结论 乳果糖适合于肝硬化肝性脑病和亚临床肝性脑病患者长期服用,可作为预防和治疗肝性脑病的常规用药。     

乳果糖治疗亚临床肝性脑病的临床研究

目的 前瞻性对比乳果糖长、短程治疗对亚临床肝性脑病(SHE)的效果及其对SHE病程的影响。方法 经智力测验(数字连接试验和数字符号试验之一异常)诊断的SHE 64例随机分入对照组(21例)、短程组(21例)和长程组(22例),后2组分别服乳果糖达8周和24周。治疗前以及治疗后每间隔8周行血氨、智力测验和体感诱发电位(SEP)等检查,共随访24周。结果 每组各有20例完成追踪。与对照组和治疗前相比,长程组血氨和智力测验显著改善(P＜0．05—0．01)且SEP的N50波潜伏期稳定不变,短程组治疗到第8周也有改善(P＜0．05),但停药后又逐渐恶化。对照组的血氨、智力测验和N50波潜伏期逐渐恶化,在16周时后2项与治疗前差异有显著性(P＜0．05—0．01);而长程组血氨持续降低,其肝性脑病(HE)患病率(5％)显著低于短程组(30％)和对照组(40％)(P＜0．05)。结论 乳果糖维持治疗能够降低血氨、改善智力测验结果并可能防止SEP的恶化,最终降低HE的患病率。     

Pharmacological prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatic encephalopathy is a frequent event after transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt (TIPS), especially during the first months. Aim of this study was to compare two different treatments (lactitol 60 g/day, rifaximin 1200 mg/day) with no-treatment in the prevention of post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy. METHODS: Seventy-five consecutive cirrhotics submitted to TIPS were randomized to receive either one of the above treatments or no-treatment. The main end-point was the occurrence of an episode of overt hepatic encephalopathy during the first month post-TIPS. Before the procedure and weekly thereafter the patients were evaluated by examining their mental status, asterixis, ammonia and trail-making-test Part-A (TMT-A). RESULTS: The three groups were comparable for age, sex, etiology, Child-Pugh-score, post-TIPS porto-systemic gradient, previous hepatic encephalopathy, basal values of ammonia and psychometric performance. Twenty-five patients developed hepatic encephalopathy (33%, CI 95%=22-45%). One-month incidence was similar in the three groups (P=0.97). Previous hepatic encephalopathy (Relative Hazard=3.79;1.27-11.31) and basal-TMT-A Z-score>1.5 (RH=3.55;1.24-10.2) were predictors of post-TIPS encephalopathy at multivariate analysis. A <5 mmHg porto-systemic gradient was also significantly related to the occurrence of encephalopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that treatment with lactitol or rifaximin is not effective in the prophylaxis of hepatic encephalopathy during the first month after a TIPS.     

Lactitol in prevention of recurrent episodes of hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients with portal-systemic shunt

Recurrent episodes of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) frequently occur in surgically shunted cirrhotic patients. The prevention of these episodes is based mainly on the long-term use of lactulose. Recently, lactitol, a nonabsorbable disaccharide similar to lactulose, has been proposed as an alternative in the management of HE. It has the advantage of being better tolerated and producing a more predictable catharsis. The effects of the two agents were compared in a controlled randomized study lasting six months involving 31 cirrhotic patients with portal-systemic shunt, of whom 40% experienced HE. The PSE index (mental state, EEG, asterixis, Raitan test, and ammonia) was assessed in each patient on entry to the study and every three months during treatment. Episodes of HE, side effects, and the patients' comments on efficacy, tolerability, and palatability were recorded. The dose required to induce two bowel movements per day was 48 +/- 25 ml of lactulose syrup and 36 +/- 7 g of lactitol. During the study, the number of patients who had an episode of HE and the PSE index was similar in both groups. The patients judged lactitol better from the point of view of palatability. Meteorism and flatulence, experienced by patients treated with lactulose, was not reported by the lactitol group. We concluded that lactitol is as effective as lactulose in the long-term prevention of episodes of HE in cirrhotics with portal-systemic shunt and may be better tolerated.     

Effect of lactitol and lactulose administration on the fecal flora in cirrhotic patients

We compared the effect of lactulose or lactitol on the fecal flora of 21 cirrhotic patients without hepatic encephalopathy. All were treated with an individualized disaccharide dose to achieve and maintain two semiliquid bowel movements per day. Stool pH and fecal flora were determined before and 10 days after stabilizing the cathartic effect. Increased counts of lactobacilli were obtained with both treatments. This increase, which was related to the decreased stool pH, was more constant with lactulose. In addition, lactitol decreased certain proteolytic bacteria such as enterococci and enterobacteria. Both total aerobic and anaerobic bacterial counts showed little quantitative variations with either treatment.     

Effects of lactulose and lactitol on protein digestion and metabolism in conventional and germ free animal models: relevance of the results to their use in the treatment of portosystemic encephalopathy.

Protein digestion and metabolism have been studied in laboratory rats and miniature pigs to investigate the mechanisms of action of lactulose and lactitol when used in the treatment of patients with portosystemic encephalopathy. Lactulose (beta-D-galactopyranosyl-(1----4)-beta-D-fructofuranose) and lactitol (beta-D-galactopyranosyl-(1----4)-D-glucitol) increased the excretion of nitrogenous material in the faeces and decreased nitrogen excretion in the urine in a similar degree to that reported for human patients. In studies with germ free rats given lactulose no such effect was observed, suggesting that, for lactulose at least, these effects are mediated by the gut flora. Measurement of the alpha-, epsilon-diaminopimelic acid content of the faeces confirmed that the enhancement of faecal nitrogen was due to an increased contribution from bacteria. The similarity in the results for lactulose and lactitol suggests that, from the perspective of protein metabolism, lactitol acts in a similar way to lactulose in the treatment of portosystemic encephalopathy.     

Efficacy of Lactulose in Cirrhotic Patients with Subclinical Hepatic Encephalopathy

To investigate the role of lactulose in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with subclinical hepatic encephalopathy (SHE), 40 cirrhotic patients, 33 males and 7 females, were included in the study. The diagnosis of SHE was made by quantitative psychometric tests including the number connection test (NCT), figure connection test (FCT) parts A and B, and two performance subtests of Wechsler adult intelligence scale, ie, picture completion (PC) and block design (BD) tests. SHE was diagnosed in 26 (65%) of 40 patients. Of these 26 patients, 14 patients were randomized to treatment group (lactulose 30–60 ml/day for three months, SHE-L) and 12 patients to no treatment group (no lactulose, SHE-NL). Psychometric tests were repeated in all patients in both groups and in six patients with no SHE (group NSHE, N = 14) after three months. The mean scores and number of the abnormal psychometric tests at entry were significantly higher in patients in groups SHE-L and SHE-NL than in patients in group NSHE; however, there was no significant difference between SHE-L and SHE-NL. The mean number of the abnormal psychometric tests decreased in patients in group SHE-L after three months of treatment with lactulose (2.9 ± 0.9 vs 0.8 ± 1.2; P = 0.004); however, there was no change in patients in group SHE-NL after three months (3.7 ± 1.5 vs 3.5 ± 1.3; P = NS). While SHE improved in 8 of 10 patients in group SHE-L, none of the patients in group SHE-NL improved after three months of follow-up (P < 0.001). Two patients in group SHE-NL also developed overt encephalopathy during the study period. We conclude that lactulose treatment in cirrhotic patients with SHE is effective.     

Disaccharides in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy

Management of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) primarily involves avoidance of precipitating factors and administration of various ammonia-lowering therapies such as nonabsorbable disaccharides and antimicrobial agents like rifaximin. The nonabsorbable disaccharides which include lactulose and lactitol are considered the first-line therapy for the treatment of HE and minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE). Lactulose significantly improves cognitive function and health-related quality of life in patients with MHE. Lactitol is comparable to lactulose in the treatment of HE with fewer side effects. Lactulose has also shown to be effective in primary and secondary prophylaxis of HE. Disaccharides were found to be comparable to rifaximin in recent systemic reviews in the treatment of HE however conclusion was based on inclusion of some poor quality trials. Combination therapy of disaccharides either with rifaximin, L-ornithine L-aspartate,probiotics for the treatment of HE needs further validation in large studies.     

Comparison of rifaximin and lactitol in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy: results of a randomized,double-blind,double-dummy,controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The efficacy and safety of rifaximin in comparison with lactitol in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy was assessed in a prospective randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled trial. METHODS: A total of 103 patients with grade I-III acute hepatic encephalopathy were randomized to receive rifaximin (50 patients, 1200 mg/day) or lactitol (53 patients, 60 g/day) for 5-10 days. Changes in the portal-systemic encephalopathy (PSE) index on entry and at the end of the study were used to evaluate the efficacy of the two therapies. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable before treatment with regard to demographic data and characteristics of the hepatic encephalopathy episode. The global efficacy of both therapies was similar: 81.6% in the rifaximin group and 80.4% in the lactitol group showed improvement or total regression of the episode. A significantly better evolution of the PSE index was observed in the rifaximin group, due to a greater effect of rifaximin in two components of the index: EEG abnormalities and ammonia levels. No serious adverse events related to either treatment were found during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Rifaximin may be considered a useful and safe alternative therapy to lactitol in the treatment of acute hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis.     

枯草杆菌二联活菌肠溶胶囊联合乳果糖治疗肝性脑病疗效分析

目的探讨枯草杆菌二联活菌肠溶胶囊联合乳果糖口服溶液治疗肝性脑病患者的临床疗效。方法将160例肝性脑病患者随机分为治疗组(84例)和对照组(76例)。治疗组给予枯草杆菌二联活菌肠溶胶囊联合乳果糖口服溶液口服,对照组给予谷氨酸钠、谷氨酸钾静脉输注。两组疗程均为14天。观察患者肝性脑病症状的改善及治疗前后血氨水平。结果治疗组总有效率为83.3%,其症状改善和降低血氨均优于对照组(P=0.044、0.038),差异有统计学意义。结论枯草杆菌二联活菌肠溶胶囊联合乳果糖治疗肝性脑病具有较好的疗效。