Immunoregulatory mechanisms in cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients

Cyclosporine (CsA)-treated recipients of a primary cadaveric (CAD) renal allograft were postoperatively evaluated for their donor and nonspecific immune responsiveness. Recipients with posttransplant (Tx) T helper (TH):T suppressor (TS) cell ratios less than 1.0 (averaged for the first 0-30 post-Tx days) had significantly better one-year serum creatinines (SCr) of 1.8 +/- 0.7 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.6 for recipients with TH:TS ratios greater than 1.0, P less than 0.05. Significantly fewer rejection episodes (30 vs. 57) and immune graft losses (10 vs. 19) were experienced by recipients with TH:TS ratios less than 1.0 vs. greater than 1.0, P less than 0.001 and 0.05, respectively. Recipients with TH:TS ratios less than 1.0 vs. greater than 1.0 displayed significantly lower post-Tx panel mixed lymphocyte culture (PMLC) stimulation indices (SI) of 24 +/- 11 vs. 38 +/- 6, P less than 0.05 and donor MLC SI of 15 +/- 6 vs. 31 +/- 8, P less than 0.05, respectively. Moreover, the post-Tx:pre-Tx donor MLC ratio of 0.58 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.32 was significantly lower in recipients with TH:TS ratios less than 1.0 vs. greater than 1.0, P less than 0.05. The suggested donor hyporesponsiveness in recipients with post-Tx TH:TS ratios less than 1.0 was further investigated by studying 46 CsA-treated allograft recipients for their ability to display regulatory T cell or adherent monocyte MLC suppressor activity. With a mean follow-up time of 5 +/- 4 months (range 0.5-14 months) we observed that 46% (21/46) of the patients displayed T cell suppressor activity, including 35% (16/46) with T-donor-specific and 46% (21/46) with T non-specific MLC suppressor activity. Additionally, 59% (27/46) of the patients also displayed nonspecific adherent monocyte MLC suppression. Recipients displaying either T cell or adherent monocyte suppression experienced significantly fewer rejection episodes than patients with no suppressor cell activity (P less than 0.05). Moreover, patients with T cell suppressor activity displayed a significantly lower panel and donor MLC vs. patients not displaying T suppressor activity (P less than 0.05. and 0.05, respectively). Finally, there was a significant correlation between the display of T cell suppressor activity in patients who were matched with their donors at the HLA-DR locus vs. no display of T suppressor activity in those patients unmatched with their donors at the HLA-DR locus.     

Immunopharmacodynamic evaluation of cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients

Since the mode of action of cyclosporine (CsA) in man is incompletely understood, there are no monitoring tools to assess immunosuppressive effect in vivo. In vitro CsA inhibits lymphoproliferation in response to allogeneic and mitogenic stimuli, presumably due to reversible suppression of T helper cell generation of interleukin-2. Therefore the present studies examined the immunosuppressive effect of patient sera on a third-party mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) as a pharmacodynamic approach to quantify patient responses to CsA administration. Four kinetic patterns of in vitro immunosuppressive activity were discerned: 24/28 (86%) patients showing two cycles of MLR inhibition--namely, a first peak corresponding to absorption of CsA and an independent second peak of immunosuppression (type I), were free of rejection; while 17/23 (74%) patients demonstrating one cycle corresponding to the peak of CsA absorption (type II) suffered rejection episodes (P less than 0.001). In addition, 20 patients generating continuously high levels of in vitro serum activity (type III) were almost all free of rejection, but manifested nephrotoxicity; while two patients showing continuously low levels (type IV) suffered graft loss due to irreversible rejection (P less than 0.01). Thus failure to display either a second peak or continuously high levels of MLR inhibition was associated with a markedly increased incidence of rejection (76% versus 16%). The in vitro functional characteristics of peak-2 were similar to those of CsA, as assessed by the kinetics of inhibition of MLR lymphoproliferation or cell-mediated lympholysis (CML), and by gross chemical properties of partitioning into organic solvents and heat stability. These findings suggest that pharmacodynamic analysis by MLR inhibition not only affords a useful parameter of immunosuppression, but also may provide an in vitro model to dissect the generation and biotransformation of active CsA metabolites.     

Onset of dialysis encephalopathy in cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients

Three patients who developed typical features of dialysis encephalopathy following renal transplantation are presented. No patient had evidence of overt neurological dysfunction pretransplantation. All patients were taking cyclosporine at the time of onset of neurological disease. Two patients died as a result of their neurological condition. The third patient made a satisfactory recovery. Factors responsible for the onset of dialysis encephalopathy in the renal posttransplantation period are discussed. We propose that cyclosporine may have been an important precipitating factor of the neurological syndrome of these patients.     

Serum C-reactive protein concentrations in cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients

Acute or persistent elevations in serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration have been shown to be of value in diagnosing acute rejection episodes in azathioprine (AZA)-treated renal transplant recipients. To assess whether changes in serum CRP level might assist in differentiating nephrotoxicity from acute rejection in cyclosporine (CsA)-treated renal transplant recipients, we measured changes occurring in serum CRP concentrations in 74 CsA patients in response to transplant operation, acute rejection, cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, and serious infection, and compared these values with changes in AZA patients. Serum CRP concentration rose in response to operation in virtually all patients, regardless of immunosuppressive regimen, from mean baselines of 5.9 +/- 2.7 mcg/ml (AZA) and 6.8 +/- 6.5 mcg/ml (CsA) to mean peak levels of 43.8 +/- 33.4 mcg/ml and 65.1 +/- 39.5 mcg/ml, respectively. CRP rose during 76% of acute rejection episodes in AZA patients by a mean of 29.7 +/- 37.4 mcg/ml. In contrast, in 80% of acute rejection episodes of CsA patients, CRP remained undetectable or failed to rise above a stable, minimally elevated baseline. Similarly, there was no elevation in CRP in 9 of 10 episodes of nephrotoxicity. In 14 CSA patients with serious infections (8 pulmonary, 3 intraabdominal, 3 genitourinary), CRP rose by a mean of 67.7 +/- 50.7 mcg/ml. Thus, although CRP rises significantly with operation or serious infection in CsA patients, CRP fails to rise with nephrotoxicity or acute rejection.     

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and vasopressin in cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients

Eleven patients, who had undergone renal transplantation and who had hypertension, aged 19-56 years, were treated with cyclosporine and prednisolone. We measured plasma renin activity, aldosterone and vasopressin (RIAs) at the first, second and third week and again 9 to 12 months after transplantation. Plasma renin activity was in the low-normal range throughout (0.31 +/- 0.05, 0.30 +/- 0.03, 0.32 +/- 0.05 ng/ml/h on short- vs. 0.32 +/- 0.04 ng/ml/h on long-term), aldosterone showed a tendency to decrease (114 +/- 27, 72 +/- 18, 71 +/- 11 pg/ml on short- vs. 54 +/- 23 pg/ml on long-term), whereas vasopressin remained moderately increased during the observation period (10.5 +/- 0.8, 10.4 +/- 1.6, 8.9 +/- 0.6 pg/ml on short- vs. 9.6 +/- 1.0 pg/ml on long-term). We then investigated the reactivity of the renin-system in 5 of the patients by stimulating renin release by captopril. Increases in plasma renin activity were only moderate (0.35 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.66 +/- 0.21 ng/ml/h) and blood pressure dropped only slightly (148 +/- 2.0/98 +/- 1.2 vs. 141 +/- 4.6/95 +/- 4.2 mmHg). Levels of plasma aldosterone were significantly suppressed from a low baseline (46.4 +/- 13.5 vs. 25.3 +/- 6.1 pg/ml, p less than 0.05). The increase in vasopressin was unaffected by captopril (9.6 +/- 1.0 vs. 8.8 +/- 0.4 pg/ml). Our results suggest that in renal transplantation patients with good graft function, the activity of the renin system is unaffected by cyclosporine treatment on short- and on long-term. Vasopressin stimulation does not seem to depend on the renin system and might play a role as a vasoconstrictor in the face of a denervated kidney.     

Posttransplant hyperglycemia. Increased incidence in cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients

The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) was compared in two groups of renal allograft recipients. These were all nondiabetic patients who had been transplanted between 1979 and 1987 and received either azathioprine-methylprednisolone (group 1) or cyclosporine-methylprednisolone (group 2) therapy as maintenance immunosuppression. The incidence of PTDM in group 1 was 9.1% vs. 18.6% in group 2 (P less than .05). The mean daily dose of methylprednisolone during the initial 2 months posttransplant was not greater among the PTDM patients of groups 1 or 2. Cyclosporine levels and mean daily CsA doses during the initial 2 posttransplant months were also not different among the CsA-PTDM and euglycemic CsA patients. Posttransplant diabetes mellitus occurred rapidly (less than 2 months) and required insulin therapy in the majority of cases. Increased age (greater than 40 years) was associated with a higher risk for PTDM, however, the greater incidence accompanying increased body weight only approached significance. Patient gender and donor source were not associated with significant risk for PTDM. The development of PTDM was accompanied by a significant decrease in graft survival at 3 years in the entire PTDM population and at 4 years in the CsA-PTDM subgroup. Actuarial patient survival was not adversely affected. The current study suggests that CsA may be diabetogenic when administered with methylprednisolone to renal allograft recipients. The adverse effect on allograft survival requires further investigation. These results may also have important implications for pancreatic and islet cell transplantation.     

Reevaluation of T cell subset monitoring in cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients

The predictive value of peripheral blood T cell subset monitoring in renal allograft recipients has been questionable, and there has been no information concerning the correlation of T cell subset changes with the clinical event related to cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. This study was conducted to investigate the clinical usefulness of serial T cell subset monitoring in 34 consecutive renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporine by determining the total peripheral lymphocyte count and T cell subset counts using Leu-4, Leu-3ab, and Leu-2a monoclonal antibodies and flow cytometry up to 6 months after transplantation. The absolute counts of all cells were lower in transplanted patients than those of normal controls, but were not different from those of hemodialysis patients. During infection, the helper/suppressor (H/S) ratio and the cell counts, except for suppressor cells, decreased significantly. Within one week prior to rejection, all cell counts also decreased significantly. Furthermore, cell counts before steroid-resistant rejection were significantly lower than those before steroid-responsive rejection. In contrast, lymphocyte and T cell counts were increased significantly within one week prior to cyclosporine nephrotoxicity being diagnosed; the H/S ratio was not correlated with rejection or toxicity. These results indicate that H/S ratio is not associated with clinical events of renal allograft recipients, but serial lymphocyte and T cell subset counts can provide valuable information for the differentiation of rejection from cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, and also for predicting the outcome of the allograft rejection.     

Follow-up of cyclosporine-treated pediatric renal allograft recipients after cessation of prednisone

We attempted cessation of prednisone therapy in 16 pediatric renal allograft recipients who were between the ages of 3 1/2 and 16 years at the time of transplantation. Fourteen had primary grafts and 2 had second grafts. Nine had cadaver and 7 had living-related donor grafts. At the time of cessation of prednisone, cyclosporine was the only other immunosuppressive therapy for 15 of the patients and 1 patient was receiving CsA and azathioprine. All the patients had stable serum creatinines at the time prednisone was stopped, between 7 months and 5 years posttransplantation. Seven patients have had no episodes of rejection, continuing to receive CsA as their only immunosuppressive therapy and have stable renal function between 16 months and 3 1/2 years (mean: 2 years) after stopping prednisone. Stopping the small maintenance dose of prednisone resulted in improved growth in patients whose epiphyses were not fused. They improved their weight:height ratios and lost their cushingoid appearance. Serum cholesterol levels declined significantly. Patients who required antihypertensive drugs to control their blood pressure while receiving prednisone required fewer or no drugs when off prednisone. Nine patients had acute rejection episodes and were put back on maintenance prednisone following a 3-day steroid pulse. All these patients had a prompt improvement in renal function following the steroid pulse. However, only 3 stabilized function at preprotocol baseline Scr. Four currently have functioning grafts with Scr greater than the preprotocol Scr. Two patients have returned to dialysis. Although stopping steroids is a worthy goal in pediatric renal allograft recipients, we cannot recommend this strategy as routine management because of the 56% rate of acute rejection episodes in the patients who had prednisone withdrawn.     

The effect of high-dose nifedipine on renal hemodynamics of cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients.

Cyclosporine has been shown to reduce renal perfusion and to decrease glomerular filtration rate. Experimental studies suggest that nifedipine might reverse this renal vasoconstrictive effect of cyclosporine. We studied renal hemodynamics of 5 cyclosporine-treated renal transplant recipients before and after 2 weeks of therapy with high-dose nifedipine (up to 120 mg/day). Pretreatment GFR and renal plasma flow (RPF) were decreased. Following administration of nifedipine, RPF increased by 18% (P less than 0.01), while GFR did not change. Filtration fraction decreased by 10.5% (P less than 0.01). Mean arterial pressure declined from 111 +/- 5 to 96 +/- 3 mmHg (P less than 0.01). Renal vascular resistance dropped by 25% (P less than 0.01). Calculated postglomerular plasma flow increased by 20.5% (P less than 0.01). Urinary albumin excretion rate was unaffected. Cyclosporine whole blood levels were unchanged. The increase in RPF and in postglomerular plasma flow suggests that high-dose nifedipine might lessen cyclosporine-induced glomerular and interstitial ischemia in renal allograft recipients.     

The beneficial effect of pretransplant blood transfusions in cyclosporine-treated cadaver renal allograft recipients

212 cyclosporine-treated recipients of mismatched first cadaveric renal allografts are evaluated with respect to the effect of pretransplant random blood transfusions. It is determined that transfusions do not effect patient survival or morbidity. Pretransplant random blood transfusions correlate with significantly improved allograft success. There is also a trend, although not statistically significant, for further improvement of allograft survival with increasing numbers of transfusions. The transfusion effect is not related to the time at which the transfusions are given up to 2 years prior to transplantation. Transfused patients have a higher percent reactive antibody (PRA) than untransfused patients, but this does not cause them to wait for a cadaveric allograft significantly longer than the untransfused patients. Rejections are less severe in transfused patients. It is concluded that cyclosporine-treated recipients of first cadaveric renal allografts benefit from pretransplant blood transfusions.     

Proteinuria in cyclosporine-treated renal transplant recipients

Of 704 renal transplant recipients receiving long-term cyclosporine immunosuppression, 71 patients experienced proteinuria greater than 1 g/24 hr beyond the first month posttransplant. Eight patients displayed transient proteinuria, defined as lasting less than 3 months. In most cases this condition was attributed to biopsy-proved acute rejection. The transient proteinuria cohort experienced good graft outcome--namely, 87.5% one-year and 52.5% five-year actuarial graft survivals, which was similar to that observed in patients without proteinuria. In contrast, 52.4% of the 63 patients with nontransient proteinuria experienced graft loss within a median time of 6.1 months. The one- and five-year actuarial graft survivals in patients with nontransient proteinuria were 75.3% and 37.5%, respectively. Among the 63 patients with nontransient proteinuria, histopathologic diagnosis included chronic rejection in 19, transplant glomerulopathy in 14, acute rejection in 9, glomerulonephritis (GN) in 7 including 2 cases of membranous GN, and nonspecific interstitial fibrosis in 10 cases. Despite the overall poor prognosis for graft survival among the entire cohort of patients with nontransient proteinuria, the seven with allograft GN maintained prolonged graft function. They showed an 83.3% five-year actuarial graft survival versus 31.2% in patients with other causes of proteinuria (P = 0.043). These results suggest that posttransplant proteinuria in CsA-treated renal transplant recipients arises primarily as a consequence of allograft rejection and portends a poor graft outcome.     

Long-term impact of prophylactic antiviral treatment in Hepatitis B surface antigenpositive renal allograft recipients

Background: Antiviral prophylaxis has been shown to prevent hepatic dysfunction in Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive kidney transplantation recipients (KTRs). However the long-term effects of antiviral prophylaxis on the patient death, graft loss, or hepatic decompensation have not been determined. Method: We therefore retrospectively analyzed outcomes in 94 HBV-positive patients, who underwent KT between February 1997 and November 2009 and were followed-up for a mean 75.7 months. Of the 94 KTRs, 56 received antiviral prophylaxis (Group 1), 51 with lamivudine and 5 with entecavir, and 38 did not (Group 2). Result: Of the latter group, 20 experienced HBV reactivation and 18 did not (mean 85 months); of those with reactivation, 16 received lamivudine, 2 received entecavir and 2 received no antiviral treatment. Cox-regression analysis showed that antiviral prophylaxis had no benefit on patient death (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.37 - 4.49, p = 0.693), graft failure (OR 1.25, 0.45 - 3.46, p = 0.666) or hepatic decompensation (OR 2.01, 0.35 - 11.57, p = 0.434). Lamivudine resistance occurred in 21 lamivudine-treated Group 1 and 4 lamivudine-treated Group 2 patients (p = 0.243), with mean times of resistance after KT of 82 and 132 months, respectively (p = 0.001). Conclusion: These findings indicate that lamivudine-based antiviral prophylaxis for HBV-positive renal recipients has no long-term clinical benefits.