Prediction of engraftment after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: CD34, colony‐forming unit–granulocyte‐macrophage,or both?

BACKGROUND: The rate of hematologic recovery after peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation is influenced by the dose of progenitor cells. Enumeration of cells that express CD34+ on their surface is the most frequently used method to determine progenitor cell dose. In vitro growth of myeloid progenitor cells (colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage [CFU-GM]) requires more time and resources, but may add predictive information. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A series of 323 patients, who underwent autologous PBPC transplantation for multiple myeloma, malignant lymphoma, or locally advanced breast cancer, were studied for the effect of CD34+ dose and CFU-GM dose on hematologic recovery. Measures for engraftment were days to absolute granulocyte and platelet (PLT) counts to greater than 500 per muL and than 20 x 10(9) per L, respectively, and number of PLT transfusions and red cell units required. RESULTS: The CD34+ dose had a median of 8.4 x 10(6) per kg, and the CFU-GM dose a median of 84.9 x 10(4) per kg. The CD34+ and CFU-GM doses showed significant correlation (R = 0.63; p < 0.0001) but a wide variation in the ratio of CD34+ and CFU-GM. Both CD34+ and CFU-GM doses had significant correlation with the measures of engraftment, but for all measures the relationship of CD34+ was stronger. Multivariate analysis and subgroup analysis of patients receiving CD34+ doses of less than 5 x 10(6) per kg also did not reveal an independent predictive value for CFU-GM. CONCLUSION: For prediction of hematologic recovery after autologous PBPC transplantation, determination of CFU-GM dose does not add to the predictive value of the CD34+ dose.     

Relationship of CD34+ cells infused and red blood cell transfusion requirements after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplants: a novel method of analysis

BACKGROUND: CD34+ cells infused predicts myeloid and platelet engraftment at the time of autologous stem cell transplantation. An association between the number of CD34+ cells infused and erythroid engraftment has yet to be established. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Red blood cells transfused after autologous transplantation were compared with the number of CD34+ cells infused. Myeloid engraftment was assessed to confirm that normal engraftment kinetics occurred. RESULTS: Logistic regression established that the logarithm of the number of CD34+ cells infused (p = 0.0498) and admission hemoglobin (Hb; p < 0.001) predicted the need for transfusion. In those patients who required transfusion, standard regression methods were not valid. A novel model demonstrated that the initial Hb (p < 0.001) and diagnosis (p = 0.047) were significant predictors of transfusion requirements in patients needing transfusion. However, the number of CD34+ cells infused did not predict transfusion requirements in this group (p = 0.226). As myeloid engraftment demonstrated kinetics that have been previously described, it can be inferred that erythroid engraftment was not atypical. CONCLUSION: The number of CD34+ cells infused predicted the need for transfusion, although it did not predict the number of RBCs transfused in those patients having transfusion during their admission for autologous stem cell transplant.     

Peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection efficacy is not an independent prognostic factor for autologous stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND: The successful mobilization and collection of hematopoietic stem cells are dependent on a number of clinical factors such as previous chemotherapy and disease stage. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether the effectiveness of mobilization and collection is an independent prognostic factor for autologous stem cell transplantation outcome. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 358 patients who received transplants from January 2003 to December 2004 (201 male and 157 female patients, ages from 2.7 to 77.3 years with median of 53 years of age) underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell collection after mobilization with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or G-CSF plus chemotherapy priming. This retrospective study included patients with diagnoses of acute myelogenous leukemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, and solid tumors. All patients underwent stem cell collection until a target or a minimum CD34+ cell dose was reached. Correlations were performed between stem cell mobilization and/or collection efficacy and transplantation outcomes. RESULTS: In general, both larger reinfused CD34+ cell dose and shorter number of days for the stem cell count to reach the minimum of 2 x 10(6) per kg CD34+ cells do not foster quicker engraftment. Reinfused CD34+ cell dose of less than 12 x 10(6) and number of days stem cell collection to reach this minimum CD34+ cell dose did not independently affect the overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS). CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection as defined as number of days to reach a CD34+ cell dose of 2 x 10(6) per kg should not be used independently to forecast posttransplantation prognosis, engraftment, DFS, and OS.     

An automatic wash method for dimethyl sulfoxide removal in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation decreases the adverse effects related to infusion

BACKGROUND: Products cryopreserved with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in stem cell transplant (SCT) often cause many adverse effects during their infusion (major cardiovascular events, dyspnea … even death). These are especially frequent in pediatric patients. We tested if a fully automated and closed wash procedure (Sepax S‐100, Biosafe) allowed us to maintain the absolute CD34+ cell number, cell viability, and engraftment potential, decreasing the untoward reactions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty‐six washes of DMSO cryopreserved peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor (HP) apheresis were studied. Blood aliquots were taken both after thawing and after washing to assess the total nucleated and CD34+ cell counts, as well as cell viability. The washed products were infused in 26 autologous SCTs (ASCTs). Results were compared with the 53 previous SCTs performed without DMSO removal. RESULTS: After washing there were no significant differences between the pre‐ and postwashing CD34+ cell counts (p = 0.08) or viability (p = 0.68). No significant differences were observed between washed and nonwashed infusions in relation to the day of the neutrophil (p = 0.46) and platelet (p = 0.26) engraftment. One adverse event, abdominal pain, occurred during the washed cells infusions. When compared with the 14 untoward reactions that took place during the nonwashed HP infusions, significance was reached (p = 0.00043). CONCLUSIONS: The automatic method described is effective in terms of CD34+ cell recovery and viability in ASCT. Moreover, Sepax decreased significantly the untoward reactions during the infusion.     

CD34+ cell responsiveness to stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha underlies rate of engraftment after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND: Stromal cell–derived factor (SDF)‐1, a chemokine produced in the bone marrow (BM), is essential for the homing of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) to the BM after transplantation. This study examines whether there is a correlation between the in vitro chemotaxis of CD34+ HSPC toward an SDF‐1 gradient and in vivo hematopoietic engraftment. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty‐five patients underwent granulocyte–colony‐stimulating factor HSPC collection and autologous transplant with a median dose of 7.7 (range, 3.9‐41.5) × 10⁶ CD34+ cells per kg body weight. The chemotactic index (CI) of CD34+ cells isolated from leukapheresis products collected from these patients was calculated as the ratio of the percentages of cells migrating toward an SDF‐1 gradient to cells migrating to media alone. Expression of the SDF‐1 receptor CXCR4 on CD34+ cells was measured by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Spontaneous cell migration (range, 3.1 ± 0.6 to 26.5 ± 7.7%) and SDF‐1–directed chemotaxis (11.1 ± 0.7 to 54.9 ± 8.3%) of CD34+ cells did not correlate with time to neutrophil engraftment, which occurred at a median of 10 days (range, 8‐16 days). Nonparametric tests showed a negative correlation (r = ?0.434) between CI and CD34+ cell dose such that neutrophil recovery occurred within the same period in patients transplanted with a lower dose of CD34+ cells but having a high CI as in those transplanted with a higher dose of CD34+ cells but having a low CI. Moreover, CI correlated (r = 0.8) with surface CXCR4 expression on CD34+ cells. CONCLUSION: In patients transplanted with a relatively lower CD34+ cell dose who achieved fast engraftment, a higher responsiveness to SDF‐1 and high CI could have compensated for the lower cell dose. However, to apply the CI as a prognostic factor of the rate of engraftment requires validation in a larger number of patients.     

A prospective clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the combination of rituximab and plerixafor as a mobilization regimen for patients with lymphoma

BACKGROUND: Previous reports suggested that rituximab may impair stem cell collection and posttransplant engraftment in lymphoma patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective biologic allocation study examined the effect of adding rituximab to a mobilization regimen of plerixafor and granulocyte–colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) for patients with CD20+ lymphoma compared with CD20? lymphoma patients mobilized without rituximab. The primary endpoint was safety of the rituximab‐containing regimen; secondary endpoints compared the efficiency of stem cell collection, posttransplant engraftment, graft characteristics, mobilization kinetics, immune reconstitution, and engraftment durability between the cohorts of patients with CD20+ and CD20? lymphoma. RESULTS: Fifteen subjects assigned to each treatment arm were accrued. Both mobilization regimens had similar toxicities. The median number of CD34+ cells collected (7.4 × 10⁶/kg vs. 6.4 × 10⁶/kg) and the median numbers of days of apheresis needed to collect stem cells were not different between the CD20+ and CD20? cohorts. No significant differences in neutrophil engraftment (median, 13.5 days vs. 13 days) or platelet engraftment (22 vs. 21 days) or in graft durability were seen comparing patients with CD20+ versus CD20? lymphoma. There were no significant differences in the kinetics of blood T‐cell or natural killer–cell reconstitution comparing the two groups. B‐cell reconstitution was delayed in the CD20+ lymphoma group, but this did not translate into a significant increase in infectious complications. CONCLUSION: Rituximab can be safely added to the combination of plerixafor and G‐CSF as a mobilization strategy without excess toxicity or posttransplant engraftment delays for patients with chemosensitive lymphoma undergoing autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation.     

脐血复温后细胞输入剂量对植入的预测作用分析

本研究探讨非血缘供者脐带血移植(unrelated cord blood transplantation,UCBT)中复温后供者细胞输入剂量对植入和造血重建的预测作用。回顾性分析1999年8月至2010年4月间接受单份UCBT的97例儿童恶性及非恶性疾病患者的临床资料,比较冷冻前和复温后检测的总有核细胞(total nucleated cells,TNC)、CD34+细胞及粒-巨噬细胞集落形成单位(colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage,CFU-GM)的输入剂量对受者的植入及造血重建速度的影响,供者脐带血均来自广州脐血库。结果表明,冷冻前TNC(/kg)(mean±SD:7.65×107±4.26×107;median:6.34×107)、CD34+细胞(/kg)(mean±SD:4.64×105±4.47×105;median:3.03×105)及CFU-GM(/kg)(mean±SD:0.79×105±1.09×105;median:0.57×105)与其对应的复温后TNC(/kg)(mean±SD:6.98×107±4.12×107;median:6.00×...     

Prospective randomized comparative observation of single- versus split-dose lenograstim to enhance engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is used to enhance hematopoietic recovery after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Recommendations for administration of G-CSF during the engraftment phase of ASCT have recently changed. This study sought to compare the early engraftment profile between groups receiving single-dose versus split-dose lenograstim to enhance engraftment after ASCT. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized study was performed with 40 patients (14 with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, 26 with multiple myeloma) undergoing ASCT. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 5 microg per kg lenograstim once daily (single dose) or 2.5 microg per kg lenograstim twice daily (split dose) starting 1 day after transplantation (Day +1). A minimum of 3 x 10(6) per kg CD34+ cells per kg was required for the autograft. RESULTS: The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 10 days for both groups. Platelet (PLT) engraftment was achieved in 11 days for the single-dose group and 14 days for the split-dose group. Episodes of clinically documented infection were low and similar in both groups (18 during 392 patient-days in the single-dose group and 22 during 556 patient-days in the split-dose group). There were no significant differences in requirements for red blood cell or PLT transfusion between the two groups. The duration of hospitalization after stem cell infusion was 18 days for the single-dose group and 22 days for the split-dose group. CONCLUSION: Administration of split doses of lenograstim is not associated with superior clinical efficacy compared with conventional daily single-dose administration for immediate hematopoietic recovery after ASCT.     

Hematopoietic recovery in cancer patients after transplantation of autologous peripheral blood CD34+ cells or unmanipulated peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells

BACKGROUND: A study of CD34+ cell selection and transplantation was carried out with particular emphasis on characteristics of short- and long-term hematopoietic recovery. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells (PBPCs) were collected from 32 patients, and 17 CD34+ cell-selection procedures were carried out in 15 of the 32. One patient in whom two procedures failed to provide 1 × 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg was excluded from further analysis. After conditioning, patients received CD34+ cells (n = 10, CD34 group) or unmanipulated (n = 17, PBPC group) PBPCs containing equivalent amounts of CD34+ cells or progenitors. RESULTS: The yield of CD34+ cells was 53 percent (18–100) with a purity of 63 percent (49–82). The CD34+ fraction contained 66 percent of colony-forming units-granulocyte- macrophage (CFU-GM) and 58 percent of CFU of mixed lineages, but only 33 percent of burst-forming units-erythroid (BFU-E) (p < 0.05). Early recovery of neutrophils and reticulocytes was identical in the two groups, although a slight delay in platelet recovery may be seen with CD34+ cell selection. Late hematopoietic reconstitution, up to 1.5 years after transplant, was also similar. The two groups were thus combined for analyses of dose effects. A dose of 40 × 10(4) CFU-GM per kg ensured recovery of neutrophils to a level of 1 × 10(9) per L within 11 days, 15 × 10(4) CFU of mixed lineages per kg was associated with platelet independence within 11 days, and 100 × 10(4) BFU-E per kg predicted red cell independence within 13 days. However, a continuous effect of cell dose well beyond these thresholds was apparent, at least for neutrophil recovery. CONCLUSION: CD34+ cell selection, despite lower efficiency in collecting BFU-E, provides a suitable graft with hematopoietic capacity comparable to that of unmanipulated PBPCs. In both groups, all patients will eventually show hematopoietic recovery of all three lineages with 1 × 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg or 5 × 10(4) CFU-GM per kg, but a dose of 5 × 10(6) CD34+ cells or 40 × 10(4) CFU-GM per kg is critical to ensure rapid recovery.     

The relationship between CD34+ stem cell dose and time to neutrophil recovery in autologous haematopoietic stem cell recipients—A single centre experience

A retrospective, observational study was performed of 112 patients who underwent autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) to determine the relationship between CD34+ stem cell dose and neutrophil engraftment. Importantly, a novel approach to more accurately calculate time to neutrophil engraftment was employed. The results demonstrated that a higher CD34+ stem cell dose was associated with faster neutrophil recovery (P?<?0.05). CD34+ stem cell dose using actual and ideal patient body weight were both equally predictive of neutrophil engraftment as were absolute and viable CD34+ measurements. The clinical implications for this relationship are limited with an increase in CD34+ stem cell dose by 1?×?10⁶/kg reducing the neutrophil engraftment time by only 3?h and 50?min. The median time to neutrophil recovery was 217?h (9 days and 1?h) and this relatively early engraftment time may be related to an early initiation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on day +1 post-transplant. Female patients engrafted 17?h faster than their male counterparts on multi-variate analysis (P?<?0.05). Conditioning chemotherapy, bacteraemia, G-CSF dose/kg body weight and increasing age had no impact on time to neutrophil recovery.     

The effect of comorbidity on survival and collected CD34 + cell counts in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients

ObjectiveIn this study, we aimed to report the effectiveness of hematopoietic cell transplantation–specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and GATMO scores in predicting overall survival (OS) who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).Material and methodsThe data of 263 MM and 204 lymphoma patients who underwent ASCT in the last 11 years were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsNeutrophil engraftment time, thrombocyte engraftment time and collected CD34+ cell counts were similar in MM patients with HCT-CI>2 and HCT-CI≤2 (all p>0.05). Although the estimated median OS of MM patients with HCT-CI ≤2 tended to be higher than those with HCT-CI>2, this difference was not statistically significant (52.8 vs 45 months, p=0.172). No effect of GATMO score on CD34 + count, engraftment times and OS in MM patients was detected (p>0.05). The effect of HCT-CI score on lymphoma patients was examined, it was found that the neutrophil engraftment time was longer (p=0.039) and the number of collected CD34+ cells was lower (p=0.02) in patients with HCT-CI>2 than those with HCT-CI≤2. While the estimated median OS of lymphoma patients with HCT-CI≤2 was 51.5 months, the estimated median OS of patients with HCT-CI>2 was 9.5 months (p=0.012). When lymphoma patients were divided into four groups according to their GATMO scores, the OS of the four groups was found to be different from each other (p<0.001).ConclusionHCT-CI and GATMO scores predict OS in lymphoma patients but not MM patients.     

The collection and evaluation of peripheral blood progenitor cells sufficient for repetitive cycles of high-dose chemotherapy support

BACKGROUND: The development of an optimized peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) harvest protocol to provide support for repetitive chemotherapy cycles is described. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBPCs mobilized by cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were studied in 163 leukapheresis harvests from 26 lymphoma patients. Harvested cells were transfused with two chemotherapy cycles and with an autologous bone marrow transplant. Progenitor cell content was examined in the context of hematopoietic engraftment. RESULTS: Mobilization allowed the harvest of large numbers of PBPCs. Peak harvests tended to occur after the recovering white cell count exceeded 10 × 10(9) per L. CD34+ lymphomononuclear cell (MNC) and colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) counts correlated poorly, but both measures peaked within 24 hours of each other in 21 of 26 patients, which demonstrated PBPC mobilization. Engraftment of platelets (> 50×10(9)/L) and granulocytes (> 500×10(6)/L) was achieved in a median of 20.5 and 16 days, respectively. A minimum number of progenitors necessary to ensure engraftment could be derived. CONCLUSION: Cyclophosphamide and G-CSF allowed the harvest of sufficient PBPCs to support multiple rounds of chemotherapy. Harvest should commence when the recovery white cell count exceeds 10×10(9) per L. PBPC harvest CD34+MNC counts are as useful as CFU-GM results in the assessment of PBPC content, and they may allow harvest protocols to be tailored to individual patients.     

The composition of leukapheresis products impacts on the hematopoietic recovery after autologous transplantation independently of the mobilization regimen

BACKGROUND: Effects of mobilization regimen on the composition of leukapheresis products (LPs) and on hematopoietic reconstitution after autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (PBPCT) are not well known. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The effects of three different mobilization regimens--stem cell factor (SCF) plus granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus cyclophosphamide (CCP), G-CSF alone, and G-CSF plus CCP--on the composition of LPs from patients with nonhematologic PBPC malignancies compared to LPs from G-CSF-mobilized healthy donors and normal marrow (BM) samples were analyzed. The impact of LP composition on both short- and long-term engraftment after autologous PBPCT was also evaluated. RESULTS: The most effective regimen for mobilization of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) into peripheral blood was SCF, G-CSF, and CCP, providing the highest numbers of all CD34+ HPCs subsets analyzed. Patients mobilized with SCF plus G-CSF plus CCP showed the highest numbers of neutrophils and monocytes, whereas the highest numbers of lymphocytes and NK cells were observed in LPs from G-CSF-mobilized patients. The overall number of CD34+ HPCs was the strongest factor for predicting recovery of platelets, whereas the number of myelomonocytic-committed CD34+ precursors was the most powerful independent prognostic factor for WBC and neutrophil recovery. The overall number of CD4+ T cells returned showed an independent prognostic value for predicting the occurrence of infections, during the first year after transplant. CONCLUSIONS: The use of different mobilization regimens modifies the overall number of CD34+ HPCs obtained during leukapheresis procedures, and also affects both the absolute and the relative composition of the LPs in different CD34+ and CD34- cell subsets.     

The absolute number of circulating CD34+ cells as the best predictor of peripheral hematopoietic stem cell yield.

Many controversies still exist about the timing of leukapheresis procedures for PBSC transplantation. Thirty-nine patients were followed daily by monitoring the absolute PB WBC count and CD34+ cell enumeration prior to apheresis. These determinations were compared with the apheresis cell content (nucleated cells and CD34+ cells yield). There was a highly significant correlation between PB CD34+ cells and apheresis CD34+ cell yield (r = 0.921, p < 0.001). A small but significant correlation was found between the PB WBC count and the apheresis nucleated cell content (r = 0.383, p < 0.001), but no correlation was found between PB WBC count and apheresis CD34+ cell yield (r = -0.065, p = 0.460). A target value of 20 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/L was determined to be the most reliable predictor to collect at least 1.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in a single apheresis. Of the 39 patients, 20 could be followed after transplantation, and a good correlation was found for total number of CD34+ cells reinfused and platelet and neutrophil engraftment. No correlation was found for nucleated cells infused and engraftment. CD34+ cell determination is a better predictor than WBC count for timing leukapheresis and is thus recommended for monitoring the quality of the product.     

Lenograstim versus filgrastim in mobilization before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma - Single center experience

ObjectivePeripheral blood stem cell transplantation is frequently used in the treatment of various hematological malignancies after intensive chemotherapy. The primary aim of our study is to compare the amount of collected CD34+ cells and engraftment times in patients mobilized with filgrastim or lenograstim.Material and MethodsDemographic and clinical data of multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma patients who underwent autologous transplantation and mobilized with G-CSF (filgrastim or lenograstim) without chemotherapy were collected retrospectively.ResultsOne hundred eleven MM and 58 lymphoma patients were included in the study. When mobilization with filgrastim and lenograstim was compared in MM patients, there was no significant difference in neutrophil and thrombocyte engraftment times of lenograstim and filgrastim groups (p = 0.931 p = 0.135, respectively). Similarly, the median number of CD34+ cells collected in patients receiving filgrastim and lenograstim was very similar (4.2 × 10⁶/kg vs 4.3 × 10⁶/kg, p = 0.977). When compared with patients who received lenalidomide before transplantation and patients who did not receive lenalidomide, the CD34+ counts of the two groups were similar. However, neutrophil and platelet engraftment times in the group not receiving lenalidomide tended to be shorter (p = 0.095 and p = 0.12, respectively). When lymphoma patients mobilized with filgrastim and lenograstim were compared, neutrophil engraftment time (p = 0.498), thrombocyte engraftment time (p = 0.184), collected CD34+ cell counts (p = 0.179) and mobilization success (p = 0.161) of the groups mobilized with filgrastim and lenograstim were similar.ConclusionThe superiority of the two agents to each other could not be demonstrated. Multi-center prospective studies with larger numbers of patients are needed.     

CD133+CD34+ and CD133+CD38+ blood progenitor cells as predictors of platelet engraftment in patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

BackgroundHematopoietic stem cells (HSC) have been characterized by CD34+ expression and an adequate dose of CD34+ cells is associated with a complete engraftment. CD133 is a more specific marker of HSC.Materials and methodsWe studied the relationship between graft content of CD34+, CD133+, and CD38+ cells and trilineage engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with different hematological disorders. Blood samples were obtained before and after mobilization with recombinant granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF, 16 μg/kg), from apheresis collections, and after transplantation.ResultsCell subsets were quantified by flow cytometry, and the dose of each population infused was correlated with success of engraftment. G-CSF induced mobilization of CD133+CD38+ cells (12.6-fold) and CD133+CD34+ cells (14.7-fold). A correlation was observed between the infused dose of CD133+CD34+ and CD133+CD38+ cells and platelet engraftment.ConclusionCD133+CD34+ and CD133+CD38+ cells were mobilized with G-CSF and these cell subsets were correlated with platelet engraftment.     

Factors influencing collection and engraftment of CD34+ cells in patients with breast cancer following high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation

Although autologous PBPC transplantation is being used increasingly for the treatment of breast cancer, there are few data on factors influencing mobilization and engraftment in these patients. We have analyzed these factors in 70 patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer undergoing autologous PBPC transplantation. All patients were mobilized after stimulation with G-CSF, and a median of 3.16 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells (range 0.75-23.33) were infused. All patients received conditioning with a combination of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin, and postinfusion G-CSF was administered to 60 patients. The median times to reach 0.5 x 10(9)/L and 1 x 10(9)/L neutrophils were 10 and 11 days, respectively. The median times to obtain 20 x 10(9)/L and 50 x 10(9)/L platelets were 12 and 18 days, respectively. An analysis of factors that influence CD34+ cell collection was performed by linear regression. Previous radiation therapy and increasing age were associated with lower numbers of CD34+ cells collected. Those variables that could influence the tempo of engraftment were examined by multivariate analysis using Cox regression models. The number of CD34+ cells infused was found to influence both neutrophil and platelet recovery. The use of G-CSF after transplant, accelerated neutrophil recovery, and having more than six cycles of previous chemotherapy was an unfavorable factor for recovering >50 x 10(9)/L platelets.     

Factors influencing engraftment in autologous peripheral hematopoetic stem cell transplantation (PBSCT).

Autologous peripheral blood stem cells transplantation (PBSCT) is a therapeutic option which can be used in various hematological neoplastic disorders; and it can prolong disease free survival and total survival and at times it may be curative. In this study, we investigated variables influencing PBSCT in 91 patients who had undergone PBSCT between 1998 and 2002 in our center, retrospectively. PBSC collection was performed after mobilization with G-CSF or chemotherapy plus growth factor. Only high dose chemotherapy was used for conditioning regimes. The median number of CD34+ was 11.5 x 10(6)/kg. Posttransplant neutrophil engraftment (>500/microL) was requiring a median of 10 days, it was 13 days for platelet engraftment (>20,000/microL). For neutrophil and platelet engraftment, we investigated; sex, age, diagnosis and CD34+ cells, the time interval between diagnosis and transplantation, number of apheresis, conditioning regime, growth factor initiation day as independent variables. In univariate analysis CD34+ cell number (>10 x 10(6)/kg), time interval more than one year between diagnosis and transplantation and BEAM conditioning was found to be significant for neutrophil engraftment. But in multivariate analysis none of them was found to be significant. For platelet engraftment in univariate analysis CD34+ cell number (>7 x 10(6)/kg), primary diagnosis of multiple myeloma initiation day of growth factor (>2 day) was found to be significant. In multivariate analyses only CD34+ cell count was found to be significant (p=0.005). In conclusion, as in previous studies we found that the only predictor of engraftment kinetics was CD34+ cell count.     

CD34+ cell enrichment for autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation by use of the CliniMACs device

Several devices for selection of CD34+ peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) have been used during the last years for reducing tumor cell contamination of the graft. The new CliniMACS system (magnetic-activated cell separation system by Miltenyi Biotech GmbH, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany) was recently approved for clinical use in Europe. To evaluate its purging efficiency and engraftment data in the autologous transplant, PBSC from 28 adult patients with various malignant diseases (non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, n = 17; chronic lymphocytic leukemia, n = 5; multiple myeloma, n = 4; acute lymphocytic leukemia, n = 1; medulloblastoma, n = 1) were mobilized by chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (10 microg/kg per day). Thirty leukapheresis products from 28 patients with a median of 4.4 x 10(8) nucleated cells/kg body weight (bw)(range 0.6-10.8 x 10(8)/kg bw) and a median of 7.1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg bw (range 2.8 to 18.8 x 10(6)/kg bw) were selected using the Cobe spectra cell separator (Cobe BCT Inc., Lakewood, CO). After the CliniMACS procedure, the median yield of CD34+ selected cells was 4.5 x 10(6)/kg (range 2.2-11.1 X 10(6)/kg bw) with a median recovery of 69.5% (range 46.9-87.3%) and a median purity of 97.7% (range 89.4-99.8%). The procedure did not alter viability of selected cells, which was tested by propidium iodide staining. So far, purified PBSC were used for autologous transplantation in 15 out of 28 patients after total body irradiation and/or high-dose chemotherapy. Median time to reach an absolute neutrophil count > 500/microl was 12 days (range 10-18 days), platelet recovery >50,000/microl occurred at day + 16 (range 11-22). With a median follow-up time of 12 months (range 3-19), 5 patients died of relapse. We confirmed the feasibility and safety of the CliniMACS CD34+ cell enrichment procedure in adult patients with autologous PBSC transplantation.     

Low-dose lenograstim to enhance engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation: a prospective randomized evaluation of two different fixed doses

BACKGROUND: G-CSF is used to enhance hematopoietic recovery after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), but the optimal dose of G-CSF during engraftment has not been established. The medical cost of ASCT is a serious financial burden in developing countries, and G-CSF is the most costly drug used in this procedure. We evaluated whether a lower, vial-size fitted dose of lenograstim is clinically equivalent to a higher fixed dose. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective randomized study was performed on 33 patients (11 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, 8 multiple myeloma, 14 breast cancer) undergoing ASCT. Patients were randomly administered 100 micro g or 250 micro g lenograstim daily starting on the next day of ASCT, with a minimum infusion of 3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. RESULTS: For both lenograstim doses, median time to neutrophil engraftment was 9 days and median time to PLT engraftment was 11 days. Episodes of clinically documented infections were 10 per 379 patient-days in the 100 microg per day group and 10 per 320 patient-days in the 250 microg per day group. There were no between-group differences in requirements for transfusion of RBCs or PLTs. Duration of hospitalization was 16 days for the 100 microg per day group and 17 days for the 250 microg per day group. Daily lenograstim dose per patient's body weight and total amount of lenograstim used during ASCT were both significantly lower in the 100 microg per day group. CONCLUSION: Administration of 100 microg per day of lenograstim showed comparable clinical efficacy to 250 microg per day lenograstim for immediate hematopoietic recovery after ASCT. Use of the lower dose was associated with lower overall lenograstim usage and lower cost.