骨转移瘤18F—FDGPET／CT影像学表现分析

目的分析骨转移瘤的18F-脱氧葡萄糖（FDG）PET／CT影像学表现。方法140例18F—FDGPET／CT检查病例,按病灶的4种CT形态（成骨改变、溶骨改变、混合改变及无改变）分组,探讨肿瘤骨转移灶代谢表现与形态表现之间的关系,进一步治疗情况与转移灶代谢表现的关系。采用SPSS10．0软件,行Mann—Whitney检验及x2检验。结果140例患者分未治疗组78例（55．7％）,治疗（化疗及内分泌）组62例（44．3％）。共检出病灶1658个,CT示成骨病灶415个（25．0％）,溶骨病灶567个（34．2％）,混合病灶177个（10．7％）,无改变病灶499个（30．1％）。对未治疗组1045个病灶平均标准摄取值（SUVmax。）行Mann—Whitney检验,混合病灶、溶骨病灶SUVmax高于成骨病灶、无改变病灶（SUVmax。中位值分别为5．7,5．2,4．8及4．6,Z=-4．680,-6．067,-2．237,-4．635,P均〈0．05）;治疗组与未治疗组行,检验,未治疗组以溶骨性改变（39．6％）为多,治疗组以成骨性改变（35．9％）为多,组间病灶组成明显不同（x2=67．8,P〈0．05）,治疗组代谢水平明显低于未治疗组（SUVmax中位值分别为4．9及4．6,Z=-4．315,P〈0．05）。结论骨转移病灶形态表现不同,其代谢表现差异明显,溶骨病灶的SUVmax。明显大于无溶骨病灶;化疗及内分泌治疗能通过对病灶转归的改变影响病灶形态及相应代谢表现。     

90Y microsphere treatment of unresectable liver metastases: changes in 18F-FDG uptake and tumour size on PET/CT

Purpose The intra-arterial administration of ⁹⁰Y microspheres is a new palliative treatment option for unresectable liver metastases. The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess changes in FDG uptake and tumour size following ⁹⁰Y microsphere treatment (SIR-Spheres) using ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT imaging.Methods Five patients with unresectable liver metastases who had failed multiple prior chemotherapy regimens received seven ⁹⁰Y microsphere treatments to a single liver lobe. All patients underwent a baseline PET/CT scan prior to treatment, as well as up to four follow-up PET/CT scans. The tumour area of 30 liver metastases was measured on CT and the FDG uptake was semiquantitatively assessed by calculation of standardised uptake values (SUVs). A total of 18 FDG-PET/CT scans were performed.Results The SUVs in the 30 treated liver metastases decreased from 6.5±2.3 at baseline to 4.2±1.8 after the first follow-up PET/CT scan (p=0.001). In contrast, the SUVs of untreated metastases increased slightly from 7.2±2.3 to 8.0±0.8. There was no difference in FDG uptake in treated versus untreated normal liver tissue. Using a previously defined threshold of 20% decrease in SUV from baseline to determine response, 20 out of 30 liver metastases were considered to have responded at the first follow-up PET/CT scan approximately 1 month after treatment. In these metastases, the SUV decreased by 47±12%, compared with a slight increase by 5.9±19% in ten non-responding metastases (p=0.0001). The changes in tumour size did not correlate with changes in FDG uptake. On the first follow-up PET/CT scan, the tumour area on CT increased by 3.1±57% in treated metastases compared with 23.3±32% in untreated metastases. A wide range of post-treatment changes of target lesions was observed on CT, including an increase in the size of hypodense lesions, necrotic features and complete resolution of CT abnormalities.Conclusion The metabolic information obtained from FDG-PET/CT seems to provide a more accurate and earlier assessment of therapy response following ⁹⁰Y microsphere treatment than does the anatomical CT information.     

Evaluation of sequential FDG-PET/CT for monitoring bone metastasis of breast cancer during therapy: correlation between morphological and metabolic changes with tumor markers

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to clarify the significance of positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) findings for evaluating the bone metastasis of breast cancer during therapy.

Patients and methods

Forty-seven patients with bone metastases from breast cancer who underwent sequential FDG-PET/CT studies during therapy were enrolled. A total of 771 lesions were identified. The changes in the PET and CT findings were compared with the tumor marker levels in each patient by calculating the weighted kappa value. The correlation between the PET and CT findings was examined for each lesion by an adjusted Chi-square test.

Results

The change in the tumor marker levels was substantially correlated with the PET findings and moderately correlated with the CT findings (weighted kappa?=?0.780 and 0.585 for quadratic weighting, respectively). An increase in FDG uptake was correlated with lytic changes on the CT images (62/65, 95.4?%, p?<?0.05). Sclerotic changes suggested improvement, but sclerosis and progression occurred at the same time in some lesions.

Conclusion

Changes of FDG uptake are useful for evaluating individual bone metastases in cases of breast cancer during therapy. Lytic change on CT images suggests progression of bone metastasis. The lysis-progression/sclerosis-improvement pattern was observed in the majority of subjects, but a sclerosis-progression pattern was also observed. The hybrid pattern of increase of FDG uptake on PET/lytic change on CT is most accurate to show progression of bone metastases. Assessments of these processes during therapy are necessary for the precise evaluation of bone metastases.     

Whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MRI vs. PET/CT in the assessment of bone lesions in oncological patients: initial results

Objectives

To compare [¹⁸?F]FDG PET/MRI with PET/CT for the assessment of bone lesions in oncologic patients.

Methods

This prospective study included 67 patients with solid tumours scheduled for PET/CT with [¹⁸?F]FDG who also underwent a whole-body PET/MRI scan. The datasets (PET/CT, PET/MRI) were rated by two readers regarding lesion conspicuity (four-point scale) and diagnostic confidence (five-point scale). Median scores were compared using the Wilcoxon test.

Results

Bone metastases were present in ten patients (15 %), and benign bone lesions in 15 patients (22 %). Bone metastases were predominantly localized in the pelvis (18 lesions, 38 %) and the spine (14 lesions, 29 %). Benign bone lesions were exclusively osteosclerotic and smaller than the metastases (mean size 6 mm vs. 23 mm). While PET/CT allowed identification of 45 of 48 bone metastases (94 %), PET/MRI allowed identification of all bone metastases (100 %). Conspicuity of metastases was high for both modalities with significantly better results using PET/MRI (p?<?0.05). Diagnostic confidence in lesion detection was high for both modalities without a significant difference. In benign lesions, conspicuity and diagnostic confidence were significantly higher with PET/CT (p?<?0.05).

Conclusions

[¹⁸?F]FDG PET/MRI shows high potential for the assessment of bone metastases by offering superior lesion conspicuity when compared to PET/CT. In hypersclerotic, benign bone lesions PET/CT still sets the reference.

Key Points

? PET/MRI and PET/CT are of equal value for the identification of disease-positive patients ? PET/MRI offers higher lesion conspicuity as well as diagnostic confidence ? PET/MRI is an attractive new alternative for the assessment of bone metastases     

Comparison of FDG PET and SPECT for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of FDG PET and bone SPECT for diagnosing bone metastases in breast cancer. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study was a prospective series of 15 patients with breast cancer who underwent both PET and bone scanning with SPECT. Comparison was performed on a lesion-by-lesion analysis. MDCT, MRI, and the patient's clinical course were used as references. RESULTS: In the lesion-by-lesion analysis (n = 900), the sensitivity for diagnosing bone metastases was 85% for SPECT and 17% for PET, specificity was 99% for SPECT and 100% for PET, and accuracy was 96% for SPECT and 85% for PET. In the statistical analysis, bone SPECT was significantly superior to FDG PET for its sensitivity (p < 0.0001) and accuracy (p < 0.0001). No statistically significant difference was seen with regard to specificity. When classifying the bone metastases as osteoblastic or osteolytic, bone scanning classified 92% of metastases as osteoblastic and 35% of metastases as osteolytic, whereas PET classified 6% of metastases as osteoblastic and 90% of metastases as osteolytic. CONCLUSION: Bone SPECT is superior to FDG PET in detecting bone metastases in breast cancer. The sensitivity of osteoblastic lesions is limited with FDG PET. Surveillance of metastatic spread to the skeleton in breast cancer patients based on FDG PET alone is not possible.     

FDG-avid sclerotic bone metastases in breast cancer patients: a PET/CT case series

Distant metastases from breast cancer most frequently occur in the skeleton. Although 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), with or without computed tomography (CT), is superior to bone scintigraphy for the detection of osteolytic bone metastases, it has been reported that sclerotic bone metastases frequently show no or only a low degree of FDG uptake on PET and PET/CT. Since both lytic and sclerotic metastases can occur in breast cancer patients, bone scintigraphy may remain of additional value in these patients. In this case series, we describe four breast cancer patients in whom FDG PET/CT has clearly visualized sclerotic bone metastases because of increased FDG uptake. Not so much the type of metastasis (sclerotic or lytic), but possibly the characteristics of the primary tumor or treatments prior to the FDG PET/CT scan might influence the degree of FDG uptake of bone metastases. The ability to detect sclerotic bone metastases based on increased FDG uptake supports the use of FDG PET/CT as a staging procedure in breast cancer patients, but knowledge of factors determining the visibility of bone metastases with FDG PET/CT is crucial.     

Earlier detection of bone metastases from pleomorphic liposarcoma in a pediatric patient by FDG PET/CT than planar 99mTc MDP bone scan

Bone scintigraphy using (99m)TC MDP (technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate) is a routine procedure for evaluation of osteoblastic metastases; however, its sensitivity compared with FDG PET/CT in a variety of malignancies remains to be established. We report a case of multiple osseous metastases revealed by FDG PET/CT in an 8-year-old girl with pleomorphic liposarcoma. Many of these osseous lesions were not visualized on the MDP planar bone scintigraphy performed 24 hours after PET/CT scan, becoming evident only on repeat bone scan performed 3 months later. The case suggests that FDG PET/CT has higher sensitivity in detecting osteoblastic metastases in pleomorphic liposarcoma.     

Evaluation of Bone Metastasis from Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using 18F-FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-HDP Bone Scintigraphy: Characteristics of Soft Tissue Formation

Purpose

Bone metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can present with soft tissue formation, resulting in oncologic emergency. Contrast-enhanced FDG PET/CT and bone scintigraphy were compared to evaluate characteristics of bone metastases with or without soft tissue formation from HCC.

Methods

Of 4,151 patients with HCC, 263 patients had bone metastases. Eighty-five patients with bone metastasis from HCC underwent contrast-enhanced FDG PET/CT. Fifty-four of the enrolled subjects had recent ^99mTc-HDP bone scintigraphy available for comparison. Metastatic bone lesions were identified with visual inspection on FDG PET/CT, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) was used for the quantitative analysis. Confirmation of bone metastasis was based on histopathology, combined imaging modalities, or serial follow-up studies.

Results

Forty-seven patients (55%) presented with soft tissue formation, while the remaining 38 patients presented without soft tissue formation. Frequent sites of bone metastases from HCC were the spine (39%), pelvis (19%), and rib cage (14%). The soft-tissue-formation group had more frequent bone pain (77 vs. 37%, p < 0.0001), higher SUV_max (6.02 vs. 3.52, p < 0.007), and higher incidence of photon defect in bone scintigraphy (75 vs. 0%) compared to the non-soft-tissue-formation group. FDG PET/CT had higher detection rate for bone metastasis than bone scintigraphy both in lesion-based analysis (98 vs. 53%, p = 0.0015) and in patient-based analysis (100 vs. 80%, p < 0 .001).

Conclusions

Bone metastasis from HCC showed a high incidence of soft tissue formation requiring emergency treatment. Although the characteristic findings for soft tissue formation such as photon defect in bone scintigraphy are helpful in detection, overall detectability of bone metastasis is higher in FDG PET/CT. Contrast-enhanced PET/CT will be useful in finding and delineating soft-tissue-forming bone metastasis from HCC.     

18F-FDG PET as a single imaging modality in pediatric neuroblastoma: comparison with abdomen CT and bone scintigraphy

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) as a single imaging agent in neuroblastoma in comparison with other imaging modalities.

Methods

A total of 30 patients with pathologically proven neuroblastoma who underwent FDG PET for staging were enrolled. Diagnostic performance of FDG PET and abdomen CT was compared in detecting soft tissue lesions. FDG PET and bone scintigraphy (BS) were compared in bone metastases. Maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of primary or recurrent lesions was calculated for quantitative analysis.

Results

Tumor FDG uptake was detected in 29 of 30 patients with primary neuroblastoma. On initial FDG PET, SUVmax of primary lesions were lower in early stage (I–II) than in late stage (III–IV) (3.03 vs. 5.45, respectively, p = 0.019). FDG PET was superior to CT scan in detecting distant lymph nodes (23 vs. 18 from 23 lymph nodes). FDG PET showed higher accuracy to identify bone metastases than BS both on patient-based analyses (100 vs. 94.4 % in sensitivity, 100 vs. 77.8 % in specificity), and on lesion-based analyses (FDG PET: 203 lesions, BS: 86 lesions). Sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET to detect recurrence were 87.5 % and 93.8, respectively.

Conclusion

FDG PET was superior to CT in detecting distant LN metastasis and to BS in detecting skeletal metastasis in neuroblastoma. BS might be eliminated in the evaluation of neuroblastoma when FDG PET is performed.     

CT appearance of bone metastases detected with FDG PET as part of the same PET/CT examination

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate lesion findings at computed tomography (CT) performed as part of a combined positron emission tomography (PET)/CT examination in patients suspected of having metastatic bone lesions-lesions that were detected with fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET as part of the same examination-and to correlate the CT and FDG PET findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval, and the need for patient informed consent was waived. Three hundred fifty-nine consecutive patients (191 male patients, 168 female patients; mean age, 56.9 years; age range, 8-92 years) underwent PET/CT. PET images were first reviewed by nuclear medicine physicians who had no clinical information regarding the presence or absence of bone metastasis by using a five-point grading system (0, a lesion was definitely negative for metastasis; 1, a lesion was probably negative; 2, a lesion was equivocal; 3, a lesion was probably positive; and 4, a lesion was definitely positive). For lesions assigned a grade of 3 or 4 at PET, CT characteristics such as the presence or absence of morphologic changes or accompanying findings (including bone destruction) were assessed by radiologists on the CT images obtained during the same imaging session. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-nine lesions in 55 patients were considered to be probable or definite bone metastases at PET. One hundred thirty-three of these lesions in 33 patients were clinically confirmed to be bone metastases at follow-up and/or histopathologic examination. CT revealed osteolytic changes in 41 (31%) and osteoblastic changes in 21 (16%) of the 133 lesions, but no or nonspecific changes were seen at CT in 49 (37%) and 22 lesions (17%), respectively. Of the 179 lesions suspected at PET, 46 ultimately proved to be nonosseous or false-positive for bone metastasis. Of these 46 lesions, 38 were not located in the bone but in adjacent tissues such as the pleura. CONCLUSION: CT images obtained as part of PET/CT scanning were useful in yielding the precise location of bone lesions and thus helping avoid misdiagnosis of bone metastasis; however, CT revealed morphologic changes in only half of the lesions assigned a grade of 3 or 4 at PET.     

Pitfalls of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of osteoblastic bone metastases in patients with breast cancer

Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the pitfalls of using 2-[¹⁸F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the evaluation of osteoblastic bone metastases in patients with breast cancer by comparing it with ^99mTc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphy.Methods Among the 89 breast cancer patients (mean age 59±15 years) who had undergone both FDG-PET and bone scintigraphy within 1 month between September 2003 and December 2004, 55 with bone metastases were studied. The bone metastases were visually classified by multi-slice CT into four types according to their degree of osteosclerosis and osteolysis—osteoblastic, osteolytic, mixed and invisible—and compared in terms of tracer uptake on FDG-PET or bone scintigraphy and SUV_mean on FDG-PET. Differences in the rate of detection on bone scintigraphy and FDG-PET were analysed for significance by the McNemar test.Results The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of bone scintigraphy were 78.2%, 82.4% and 79.8% respectively, and those of FDG-PET were 80.0%, 88.2% and 83.1%, respectively, revealing no significant differences. According to the CT image type, the visualisation rate of bone scintigraphy/FDG-PET was 100%/55.6% for the blastic type, 70.0%/100.0% for the lytic type, 84.2%/94.7% for the mixed type and 25.0%/87.5% for the invisible type. The visualisation rates of bone scintigraphy for the blastic type and FDG-PET for the invisible type were significantly higher. The SUV_mean of the blastic, lytic, mixed and invisible types were 1.72±0.28, 4.14±2.20, 2.97±1.98 and 2.25±0.80, respectively, showing that the SUV_mean tended to be higher for the lytic type than for the blastic type.Conclusion FDG-PET showed a low visualisation rate in respect of osteoblastic bone metastases. Although FDG-PET is useful for detection of bone metastases from breast cancer, it is apparent that it suffers from some limitations in depicting metastases of the osteoblastic type.An editorial commentary on this paper is available at     

Positron emission tomography and bone metastases

The use of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the evaluation and management of patients with malignancy continues to increase. However, its role in the identification of bone metastases is far from clear. FDG has the advantage of demonstrating all metastatic sites, and in the skeleton it is assumed that its uptake is directly into tumor cells. It is probable that for breast and lung carcinoma, FDG-PET has similar sensitivity, although poorer specificity, when compared with the isotope bone scan, although there is conflicting evidence, with several articles suggesting that it is less sensitive than conventional imaging in breast cancer. There is convincing evidence that for prostate cancer, FDG-PET is less sensitive than the bone scan and this may be tumor specific. There is very little data relating to lymphoma, but FDG-PET seems to perform better than the bone scan. There is an increasing body of evidence relating to the valuable role of FDG-PET in myeloma, where it is clearly better than the bone scan, presumably because FDG is identifying marrow-based disease at an early stage. There are, however, several other important variables that should be considered. The morphology of the metastasis itself appears to be relevant. At least in breast cancer, different patterns of FDG uptake have been shown in sclerotic, lytic, or lesions with a mixed pattern, Furthermore, the precise localization of a metastasis in the skeleton may be important with regard to the extent of the metabolic response induced. Previous treatment is highly relevant and it has been found that although the majority of untreated bone metastases are positive on PET scans and have a lytic pattern on computed tomography (CT), after treatment, incongruent CT-positive/PET-negative lesions are significantly more prevalent and generally are blastic, which presumably reflects a direct effect of treatment. Finally, the aggressiveness of the tumor itself may be relevant. The most important question, however, is irrespective of whether a lesion is seen on x-ray, CT, or bone scan and irrespective of lytic of blastic morphology: if the FDG-PET study is negative, what is the clinical relevance of that lesion?     

Whole-body FDG PET/CT is more accurate than conventional imaging for staging primary breast cancer patients

Purpose

This retrospective study aimed (1) to compare the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body FDG PET/CT for initial breast cancer staging with the accuracy of a conventional, multimodal imaging algorithm, and (2) to assess potential alteration in patient management based on the FDG PET/CT findings.

Methods

Patients with primary breast cancer (106 women, mean age 57?±?13?years) underwent whole-body FDG PET/CT and conventional imaging (X-ray mammography, MR mammography, chest plain radiography, bone scintigraphy and breast, axillary and liver ultrasonography). The diagnostic accuracies of FDG PET/CT and a conventional algorithm were compared. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed in terms of primary tumour detection rate, correct assessment of primary lesion focality, T stage and the detection rates for lymph node and distant metastases. Histopathology, imaging or clinical follow-up served as the standards of reference.

Results

FDG PET/CT was significantly more accurate for detecting axillary lymph node and distant metastases (p?=?0.0125 and p?Conclusion Full-dose, intravenous contrast-enhanced FDG PET/CT was more accurate than conventional imaging for initial breast cancer staging due to the higher detection rate of metastases and synchronous tumours, although the study had several limitations including a retrospective design, a possible selection bias and a relevant false-positive rate for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases. FDG PET/CT resulted in a change of treatment in a substantial proportion of patients.     

The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.

The aim of this study was to compare the detection of bone metastases by 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) planar bone scintigraphy (BS), SPECT, 18F-Fluoride PET, and 18F-Fluoride PET/CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: In a prospective study, BS and 18F-Fluoride PET/CT were performed on the same day in 44 patients with high-risk prostate cancer. In 20 of the latter patients planar BS was followed by single field-of-view (FOV) SPECT and in 24 patients by multi-FOV SPECT of the axial skeleton. Lesions were interpreted separately on each of the 4 modalities as normal, benign, equivocal, or malignant. RESULTS: In patient-based analysis, 23 patients had skeletal metastatic spread (52%) and 21 did not. Categorizing equivocal and malignant interpretation as suggestive for malignancy, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of planar BS were 70%, 57%, 64%, and 55%, respectively, of multi-FOV SPECT were 92%, 82%, 86%, and 90%, of (18)F-Fluoride PET were 100%, 62%, 74%, and 100%, and of 18F-Fluoride PET/CT were 100% for all parameters. Using the McNemar test, 18F-Fluoride PET/CT was statistically more sensitive and more specific than planar or SPECT BS (P < 0.05) and more specific than 18F-Fluoride PET (P < 0.001). SPECT was statistically more sensitive and more specific than planar BS (P < 0.05) but was less sensitive than 18F-Fluoride PET (P < 0.05). In lesion-based analysis, 156 lesions with increased uptake of 18F-Fluoride were assessed. Based on the corresponding appearance on CT, lesions were categorized by PET/CT as benign (n = 99), osteoblastic metastasis (n = 46), or equivocal when CT was normal (n = 11). Of the 156 18F-Fluoride lesions, 81 lesions (52%), including 34 metastases, were overlooked with normal appearance on planar BS. SPECT identified 62% of the lesions overlooked by planar BS. 18F-Fluoride PET/CT was more sensitive and more specific than BS (P < 0.001) and more specific than PET alone (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: 18F-Fluoride PET/CT is a highly sensitive and specific modality for detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. It is more specific than 18F-Fluoride PET alone and more sensitive and specific than planar and SPECT BS. Detection of bone metastases is improved by SPECT compared with planar BS and by 18F-Fluoride PET compared with SPECT. This added value of 18F-Fluoride PET/CT may beneficially impact the clinical management of patients with high-risk prostate cancer.     

Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in differentiation of a benign lesion and metastasis on the ribs of cancer patients

ObjectiveIncidental 18-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG) uptake in the ribs is a relatively common finding on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images of cancer patients. This study examined the role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating between benign lesions and metastases on the ribs.MethodsThis study included 264 lesions in 172 PET/CT cases with underlying malignancy showing newly developed indeterminate ¹⁸F-FDG rib uptake between June 2009 and May 2010. Patients with more than five FDG rib uptakes or hematologic malignancy were excluded. Malignancy was confirmed either histologically or by imaging studies, and clinical follow-up with serial images was at least 6 months. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the rib lesion was recorded. The FDG uptake patterns (focal or segmental; discrete or non-discrete) and CT findings (evidence of fracture, soft tissue lesions, osteoblastic and/or osteolytic lesions) were recorded.ResultsThere were 206 benign lesions and 58 metastases. The SUVmax was significantly higher in the metastatic group (3.0±1.8) than in the benign group (2.5±1.1), (P= .014). For the differential diagnosis between benign and metastatic lesions, the best SUVmax cut-off was determined to be 2.4. Significant indicators for metastasis were a segmental FDG uptake pattern (OR=10.262, 95% CI 4.151–25.371), presence of an osteoblastic/-lytic lesion (OR=22.903, 95% CI 10.468 to 50.108) and the absence of fractures on CT (OR=291.629, 95% CI 39.09–2175.666).ConclusionSUVmax alone is not sufficient to differentiate benign and metastatic rib lesions in cancer patients. The diagnostic accuracy can be further increased when findings of the CT part of PET/CT are considered.     

Assessment of malignant skeletal disease: initial experience with 18F-fluoride PET/CT and comparison between 18F-fluoride PET and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.

18F-fluoride PET/CT was performed on 44 oncologic patients to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy in assessing malignant osseous involvement and in differentiating malignant from benign bone lesions. METHODS: (18)F-fluoride PET and (18)F-fluoride PET/CT were interpreted separately. Lesions showing increased (18)F-fluoride uptake were categorized as malignant, benign, or inconclusive. The final diagnosis of lesions was based on histopathology, correlation with contemporaneous diagnostic CT or MRI, or clinical follow-up of at least 6 mo (mean, 10 +/- 3 mo). RESULTS: Increased (18)F-fluoride uptake was detected at 212 sites, including 111 malignant lesions, 89 benign lesions, and 12 lesions for which the final diagnosis could not be determined. In a lesion-based analysis, the sensitivity of PET alone in differentiating benign from malignant bone lesions was 72% when inconclusive lesions were considered false negative and 90% when inconclusive lesions were considered true positive. On PET/CT, 94 of 111 (85%) metastases presented as sites of increased uptake with corresponding lytic or sclerotic changes, and 16 of the 17 remaining metastases showed normal-appearing bone on CT, for an overall sensitivity of 99% for tumor detection. For only 1 metastasis was PET/CT misleading, suggesting the false diagnosis of a benign lesion. The specificity of PET/CT was significantly higher than that of PET alone (97% vs. 72%, P < 0.001). PET/CT identified benign abnormalities at the location exactly corresponding to the scintigraphic increased uptake for 85 of 89 (96%) benign lesions. In a patient-based analysis, the sensitivity of PET and PET/CT was 88% and 100%, respectively (P < 0.05) and the specificity was 56% and 88%, respectively (not statistically significant). Among the 12 patients referred for (18)F-fluoride assessment because of bone pain despite negative findings on (99m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphy, (18)F-fluoride PET/CT suggested malignant bone involvement in all 4 patients with proven skeletal metastases, a potential benign cause in 4 of 7 patients who had no evidence of metastatic disease, and a soft-tissue tumor mass invading a sacral foramen in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that (18)F-fluoride PET/CT is both sensitive and specific for the detection of lytic and sclerotic malignant lesions. It accurately differentiated malignant from benign bone lesions and possibly assisted in identifying a potential cause for bone pain in oncologic patients. For most lesions, the anatomic data provided by the low-dose CT of the PET/CT study obviates the performance of full-dose diagnostic CT for correlation purposes.     

High-risk melanoma: accuracy of FDG PET/CT with added CT morphologic information for detection of metastases

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) with added CT morphologic information for depiction of metastases in patients with high-risk melanoma and negative findings for metastases at PET, by using histologic findings or additional imaging and/or follow-up findings as reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained. Informed consent was obtained from patients. One hundred twenty-four consecutive high-risk melanoma patients (65 female, 59 male; mean age, 54.4 years; range, 15-82 years) were included. Fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT was performed. First, PET/CT scans were evaluated for presence of metastases with increased FDG uptake; CT anatomic location was determined. Lesions were considered metastases if there was focal uptake higher than that of background tissue. Second, coregistered CT images of combined PET/CT scans were evaluated for presence of lesions without FDG uptake. Findings were compared with reference standard findings to determine the accuracy of each evaluation. McNemar test was used to assess statistical differences in accuracy. RESULTS: In 53 of 124 patients, metastases were found. In 46 of 53 patients with metastases, lesions had increased FDG uptake. In seven patients with metastatic disease, metastases did not have increased FDG uptake (maximum standard uptake value [SUV], <1.5; n = 5) or had faint FDG uptake (maximum SUV, 2.5 and 2.9; n = 2)-findings that were inconclusive with PET alone. These lesions were interpreted as metastases only with coregistered CT images. Lesions missed with PET were located in the lungs, iliac lymph nodes, subcutis, and psoas muscle. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respectively, of PET/CT for depiction of metastases were 85%, 96%, and 91%, and those of PET/CT with dedicated CT interpretation were 98%, 94%, and 96% (P = .016). CONCLUSION: Dedicated analysis of coregistered CT images significantly improves the accuracy of integrated PET/CT for depiction of metastases in patients with high-risk melanoma.     

The additional value of PET/CT over PET in FDG imaging of oesophageal cancer

Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the value of combined PET/CT compared with PET reviewed side-by-side with CT, in patients with oesophageal cancer, before and after surgery.Methods Forty-one FDG PET/CT studies were performed in 32 patients with oesophageal cancer, before surgery (n=18) or during follow-up after resection of the primary tumour (n=23). One hundred and fifteen sites suspicious for malignancy were evaluated. PET/CT was prospectively compared with PET reviewed side-by-side with CT, for detection, accurate localisation and characterisation of malignant sites. PET/CT performance in different anatomical regions was compared before and after surgery. The impact of fused data on patient management was retrospectively assessed.Results PET/CT had an incremental value over PET for interpretation of 25 of 115 sites (22%), changing the initial characterisation of ten sites to either malignant (n=1) or benign (n=9), and defining the precise anatomical location of 15 sites. PET/CT provided better specificity and accuracy than PET for detecting sites of oesophageal cancer (81% and 90% vs 59% and 83% respectively, p<0.01). Fusion was of special value for interpretation of cervical and abdomino-pelvic sites, for disease assessment in loco-regional lymph nodes before surgery and in regions of postoperative anatomical distortion. PET/CT had an impact on the further management of four patients (10%), by detecting nodal metastases that warranted disease upstaging (n=2) and by excluding disease in sites of benign uptake after surgery (n=2).Conclusion PET/CT improves the accuracy of FDG imaging in oesophageal cancer and provides data of diagnostic and therapeutic significance for further patient management.     

The role of 18F-fluoride PET-CT in the detection of bone metastases in patients with breast, lung and prostate carcinoma: a comparison with FDG PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan

Objectives

We aimed to compare the role of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT, FDG PET/CT and ^99mTc-MDP bone scans in the detection of bone metastases in patients with lung, breast and prostate carcinoma.

Methods

This was a prospective study including patients for staging (S) and restaging (R). Seventy-two patients (23S, 49R) with infiltrating ductal breast carcinoma, 49 patients (25S, 24R) with prostate adenocarcinoma and 30 patients (17S, 13R) with non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), without known bone metastases but with high risk/clinical suspicion for the same, underwent a ^99mTc-MDP bone scan, FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT within 2 weeks. All scans were reviewed by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians, and the findings were correlated with MRI/thin-slice CT/skeletal survey. Histological verification was done wherever feasible.

Results

Sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT was 100 % in all three malignancies, while that of FDG PET/CT was 79 % and 73 % in NSCLC, 73 % and 80 % in breast cancer and 72 and 65 % in prostate cancer. Specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of FDG PET/CT were 100 % in NSCLC and prostate and 97 % and 96 % in breast cancer. As compared to the ^99mTc-MDP bone scan, all parameters were superior for ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT in prostate and breast cancer, but sensitivity and NPV were equal in NSCLC. The MDP bone scan had superior sensitivity and NPV compared to FDG PET/CT but had low specificity and PPV.

Conclusion

To rule out bone metastases in cases where there is a high index of suspicion, ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT is the most reliable investigation. ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT has the potential to replace the ^99mTc-MDP bone scan for the detection of bone metastases.     

肝癌经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞后PET/CT显像的临床价值

目的 探讨18F-脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)PET/CT检查评估肝细胞肝癌(HCC)经导管肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗后肿瘤活性及对转移灶的检出能力.方法 22例HCC患者TACE后进行18F-FDG PET/CT检查,以临床随访及部分病理结果为标准进行对照分析.结果 22例患者中,18例复发或转移,其余4例全身未见明显FDG代谢异常增高灶.16例患者肝内有1个或多个18F-FDG放射性增高灶,其中5例碘油沉积区和非碘油沉积区均有FDG浓聚灶,13例并发肝外转移病灶;2例肝内FDG显像阴性但腹膜后淋巴结放射性浓聚.转移灶分布:肺和淋巴结转移各9例,骨转移2例,门静脉瘤栓和膈脚转移各1例.经随访证实2例肝内18F-FDG显像为假阴性,18F-FDG PET/CT检查对肝内肿瘤复发或转移灶的探测灵敏度为88.9%(16/18),特异性为4/4,准确性为90.9%(20/22);全身显像对肿瘤复发或转移检测的灵敏度为94.7%(18/19),特异性为3/3,准确性为95.5%(21/22).结论 18F-FDG PET/CT显像对HCC介入治疗后的残留或复发灶探测有较高的灵敏度,对肝外转移病灶的检出具有独特的优势.