健康人矢状面照片拍摄法评定头颈姿势的信度研究

目的:探索矢状面照片拍摄法评定头颈姿势的评估者间信度和评估者内部信度.方法:选取27例健康受试者,在左侧耳屏、肩峰及C7棘突处作红色标记,从受试者左侧拍摄其坐位矢状面照片,包括头颈和上胸段.选取头颈角,即耳屏和C7棘突连线和水平线所形成的夹角作为评定头颈姿势的参数.评估方法包括目测观察法和量角尺测量法.两位评估者独立评...     

Intrasession and intersession reliability of hand-held dynamometer measurements taken on brain-damaged patients

Recent reports have characterized force measurements obtained with hand-held dynamometers from brain-damaged patients as being highly reliable. The purposes of this two-part study were to replicate essential parts of those studies and to further examine the reliability of these measurements in a clinical context. Repeated force measurements were taken from the nonparetic and paretic limbs of brain-damaged patients during the same testing session (Part 1) and during two testing sessions separated by two days (Part 2). The intratester intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for all measurements taken during a single session ranged from .88 to .98. The ICCs for repeated measurements taken two days apart from the paretic limbs ranged from .90 to .98. The ICCs for repeated measurements taken two days apart from the nonparetic limbs ranged from .31 to .93. The ICCs for repeated measurements taken two days apart from the combined data for all limbs ranged from .79 to .97. Hand-held dynamometer measurements taken on brain-damaged patients appear to be highly reliable when taken during the same testing session. When repeated measurements are separated by a longer time interval, the measurements taken from the paretic limbs continue to be highly reliable, whereas most measurements taken on the nonparetic limbs exhibit poor reliability.     

Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the manual handling component of the WorkHab Functional Capacity Evaluation

The WorkHab Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) is widely used in Australian workplace injury management and occupational rehabilitation arenas; however, there is a lack of published literature regarding its reliability and validity.

Purpose.?This study investigated the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the manual handling component of this FCE.

Method.?A DVD was produced containing footage of the manual handling components of the WorkHab conducted with four injured workers. Therapist raters (n == 17) who were trained and accredited in use of the WorkHab FCE scored these components and 14 raters re-evaluated them after approximately 2 weeks. Ratings were compared using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), paired sample t-tests (intra-rater), chi-squared (inter-rater) and percentage agreement.

Results.?Intra-rater agreement was high with ICCs for the manual handling components and manual handling score showing excellent reliability (0.94–0.98) and good reliability for identification of the safe maximal lift (ICC: 0.81). Overall inter-rater agreement ranged from good to excellent for the manual handling components and safe maximal lift determination (ICC > 0.9). Agreement for safe maximal lift identification was good.

Conclusions.?Ratings demonstrated substantial levels of intra-rater and inter-rater reliability for the lifting components of the WorkHab FCEs.     

Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of a clinical protocol for measuring turnout in collegiate dancers

Reliable methods of measuring turnout in dancers and comparing active turnout (used in class) with functional (uncompensated) turnout are needed. Authors have suggested measurement techniques but there is no clinically useful, easily reproducible technique with established inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. We adapted a technique based on previous research, which is easily reproducible. We hypothesized excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability between experienced physical therapists (PTs) and a briefly trained faculty member from a university’s department of dance. Thirty-two participants were recruited from the same dance department. Dancers’ active and functional turnout was measured by each rater. We found that our technique for measuring active and functional turnout has excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability when performed by two experienced PTs and by one briefly trained university-level dance faculty member. For active turnout, inter-rater reliability was 0.78 among all raters and 0.82 among only the PT raters; intra-rater reliability was 0.82 among all raters and 0.85 among only the PT raters. For functional turnout, inter-rater reliability was 0.86 among all raters and 0.88 among only the PT raters; intra-rater reliability was 0.87 among all raters and 0.88 among only the PT raters. The measurement technique described provides a standardized protocol with excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability when performed by experienced PTs or by a briefly trained university-level dance faculty member.     

Clinical reliability and usability of smartphone goniometers for hip range of motion measurement

[Purpose] This study aimed to utilize the objective measurements and a survey questionnaire for assessing the intra- and inter-rater reliability, measurement time, and usability of a smartphone application type of goniometer to measure the hip joint angles. [Participants and Methods] Three examiners (physiotherapists) measured the hip joint range of motion using universal and smartphone goniometers on 30 daycare center rehabilitation patients. Reliability was calculated using the intra-class correlation coefficient. The examiners completed a questionnaire survey for assessing the usability of the goniometers. [Results] The intra-rater reliability was high, but the inter-rater reliability was low. Measurement times using the two instruments showed no difference. The usability questionnaire findings suggested that the smartphone goniometer was easier to use than the universal goniometer. [Conclusion] Reliability within the raters was high, but reliability among the raters was low. However, both goniometric devices provided a satisfactory range of motion measurement data when a single evaluator used the same device for all measurements.     

Reproducibility of physiological track-and-trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward

OBJECTIVE: Physiological track-and-trigger warning systems are used to identify patients on acute wards at risk of deterioration, as early as possible. The objective of this study was to assess the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the physiological measurements, aggregate scores and triggering events of three such systems. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: General medical and surgical wards in one non-university acute hospital. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Unselected ward patients: 114 patients in the inter-rater study and 45 patients in the intra-rater study were examined by four raters. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Physiological observations obtained at the bedside were evaluated using three systems: the medical emergency team call-out criteria (MET); the modified early warning score (MEWS); and the assessment score of sick-patient identification and step-up in treatment (ASSIST). Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were assessed by intra-class correlation coefficients, kappa statistics and percentage agreement. There was fair to moderate agreement on most physiological parameters, and fair agreement on the scores, but better levels of agreement on triggers. Reliability was partially a function of simplicity: MET achieved a higher percentage of agreement than ASSIST, and ASSIST higher than MEWS. Intra-rater reliability was better then inter-rater reliability. Using corrected calculations improved the level of inter-rater agreement but not intra-rater agreement. CONCLUSION: There was significant variation in the reproducibility of different track-and-trigger warning systems. The systems examined showed better levels of agreement on triggers than on aggregate scores. Simpler systems had better reliability. Inter-rater agreement might improve by using electronic calculations of scores.     

Intra and inter-rater reliability study of pelvic floor muscle dynamometric measurements

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra and inter-rater reliability of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) dynamometric measurements for maximum and average strengths, as well as endurance.

METHOD:

A convenience sample of 18 nulliparous women, without any urogynecological complaints, aged between 19 and 31 (mean age of 25.4±3.9) participated in this study. They were evaluated using a pelvic floor dynamometer based on load cell technology. The dynamometric evaluations were repeated in three successive sessions: two on the same day with a rest period of 30 minutes between them, and the third on the following day. All participants were evaluated twice in each session; first by examiner 1 followed by examiner 2. The vaginal dynamometry data were analyzed using three parameters: maximum strength, average strength, and endurance. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was applied to estimate the PFM dynamometric measurement reliability, considering a good level as being above 0.75.

RESULTS:

The intra and inter-raters'' analyses showed good reliability for maximum strength (ICC_intra-rater1=0.96, ICC_intra-rater2=0.95, and ICC_inter-rater=0.96), average strength (ICC_intra-rater1=0.96, ICC_intra-rater2=0.94, and ICC_inter-rater=0.97), and endurance (ICC_intra-rater1=0.88, ICC_intra-rater2=0.86, and ICC_inter-rater=0.92) dynamometric measurements.

CONCLUSIONS:

The PFM dynamometric measurements showed good intra- and inter-rater reliability for maximum strength, average strength and endurance, which demonstrates that this is a reliable device that can be used in clinical practice.     

Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the assessment of capacity for myoelectric control.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability of the Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC) in children and adults with a myoelectric prosthetic hand. DESIGN: Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability estimated from reported assessments by 3 different raters. PATIENTS: A sample of convenience of 26 subjects (11 males, 15 females) with upper limb reduction deficiency or amputation and myoelectric prosthetic hands were video-taped during a regular clinical visit for ACMC. Participants' ages ranged from 2 to 40 years. METHODS: After instruction, 3 occupational therapists with no, 10 weeks' and 15 years' clinical experience of myoelectric prosthesis training and follow-up independently rated the 30 ACMC items for each patient. The ratings were repeated after 2-4 weeks. Inter- and intra-rater reliability in items was examined by using weighted kappa statistics and Rasch-measurement analyses. RESULTS: The mean intra-rater agreement in items was excellent (kappa 0.81) in the more experienced raters. Fit statistics showed too much variation in the least experienced rater, who also had only good (kappa 0.65) agreement in items. The stability of rater calibrations between first and second assessment showed that no rater varied beyond chance (>0.50 logit) in severity. The mean inter-rater agreement in items was fair; kappa 0.60, between the experienced raters and kappa 0.47 between raters with no and 10 weeks' experience. CONCLUSION: Overall, the agreement was higher in the more experienced raters, indicating that reliable measures of the ACMC require clinical experience from myoelectric prosthesis training.     

The Intra- and Inter-rater Reliability of an Arm Care Screening Tool in High School Baseball Coaches

BackgroundPreseason movement screening can identify modifiable risk factors, deterioration of function, and potential for injury in baseball players. Limited resources and time intensive testing procedures prevent high school coaches from accurately performing frequent movement screens on their players.PurposeTo establish the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a novel arm care screening tool based on the concepts of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) and Selective Functional Movement Assessment (SFMA™) in high school coaches.Study DesignMethodological intra- and inter-rater reliability studyMethodsThirty-one male high school baseball players (15.9 years ± 1.06) were independently scored on the Arm Care Screen (ACS) by three examiners (two coaches, one physical therapist) in real-time and again seven days later by reviewing video recordings of each players’ initial screening performance. Results from each examiner were compared within and between raters using Cohen’s kappa and percent absolute agreement.ResultsSubstantial to excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were established among all raters for each component of the ACS. The mean Cohen’s kappa coefficient for intra-rater reliability was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.95) and percent absolute agreement ranged from 0.82-0.94 among all raters. Inter-rater reliability demonstrated a mean Cohen’s kappa value of 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.99) while percent absolute agreement between raters ranged from 0.81-1.00. Intra- and inter-rater reliability did not differ between raters with various movement screening experience (p>0.05).ConclusionsHigh school baseball coaches with limited experience screening movement can reliably score all three components of the ACS in less than three minutes with minimal training.Level of EvidenceLevel 3, Reliability study     

Reliability of measurement of tempo-spatial parameters of gait after stroke using GaitMat II

OBJECTIVE: (1) To find the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of raters using GaitMat II to measure tempo-spatial gait parameters of stroke patients. (2) To find if reliability is related to abnormality of footprint patterns. DESIGN: A prospective agreement study. SETTING: A movement analysis laboratory. SUBJECTS: Nineteen adults who were at least six months after stroke and able to walk 4 metres with or without assistance participated as subjects in this study. There were five raters. METHODS: Subjects completed at least two walks along GaitMat II. The raw footprint data were analysed independently by each of the five raters. RESULTS: Mean intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for each rater within subject ranged from 0.8398 to 0.9318. However eight of the 17 parameters tested showed significant differences between raters (p = 0.0029 to p < 0.0001). When the most inexperienced rater was excluded, differences between experienced raters (n = 4) was found to be statistically insignificant for all parameters. The association of the mean score and standard deviation of experienced raters was significant for nine parameters (r values 0.5087 to 0.9459), i.e., as walking pattern became more abnormal, variation in scoring between raters increased. CONCLUSIONS: GaitMat II may have acceptable inter-rater reliability if raters have experience of gait analysis but disagreement may increase when stroke patients exhibit more abnormal gait patterns.     

Communicating vessels volumeter to measure upper extremity lymphedema after breast cancer: reliability and criterion validity compared to the gold standard

BackgroundThe traditional overflow method for measuring limb volume remains the gold standard, but many disadvantages still inhibit its routine use in clinical practice.ObjectiveTo assess the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and criterion validity of the ‘communicating vessels volumeter’ (CVV) for volume measurement of lymphedematous upper extremities (LUE) by using the overflow volumeter (OV) as the reference standard.MethodsTwelve LUE of 12 women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer were measured three times each by three raters using both methods, totaling 216 volume measurements. Criterion validity was estimated by 33 volume measurements of one cylinder of known volume by three raters using both methods, totaling 198 measurements.ResultsMeasurement time was short with both CVV and OV. The intraclass correlation coefficient_3,1 was high for both CVV and OV in intra-rater (0.99 vs 0.99) and inter-rater (0.99 vs 0.99) analyses. The bias between methods was low (7.50 mL; 0.40%) and the limits of agreement were narrow (?5.80 to 6.50%). The volumes were statistically equal with a strong correlation (R² = 0.98) between methods. CVV was more accurate than OV (0.00 vs 0.02%) in cylinder measurements.ConclusionThe high intra-rater and inter-rater reliability rates of CVV were comparable to those of OV, and the volumes resulting from LUE measurements were statistically equal in the two methods. Criterion validity rates indicated that CVV measurements were closer to the actual value of the cylinder than those obtained with the OV.     

Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the anterior atlantodental interval measurement from conventional lateral view flexion/extension radiographs

An investigation of intra- and inter-rater reliability anterior atlantodental interval (AADI) measurements was conducted using flexion/extension plain radiographs. Flexion and extension lateral radiographs of individuals investigated for atlantoaxial instability were measured for AADI on three occasions. Intra-rater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for both flexion (0.99) and extension (0.96). Inter-rater ICCs were 0.93 and 0.84 for flexion and extension, respectively. The AADI measurement proved to be reproducible with a minimal standard of error, between and within raters.     

Intra-rater and Inter-rater Reliability of Mandibular Range of Motion Measures Considering a Neutral Craniocervical Position

[Purpose] The aim of this study was to determine the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the mandibular range of motion (ROM) considering the neutral craniocervical position when performing the measurements. [Subjects and Methods] The sample consisted of 50 asymptomatic subjects. Two raters measured four mandibular ROMs (maximal mouth opening (MMO), laterals, and protrusion) using the craniomandibular scale. Subjects alternated between raters, receiving two complete trials per day, two days apart. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was determined using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess reliability, bias, and variability. Finally, the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) were analyzed to measure responsiveness. [Results] Reliability was good for MMO (inter-rater, ICC= 0.95−0.96; intra-rater, ICC= 0.95−0.96) and for protrusion (inter-rater, ICC= 0.92−0.94; intra-rater, ICC= 0.93−0.96). Reliability was moderate for lateral excursions. The MMO and protrusion SEM ranged from 0.74 to 0.82 mm and from 0.29 to 0.49 mm, while the MDCs ranged from 1.73 to 1.91 mm and from 0.69 to 0.14 mm respectively. The analysis showed no random or systematic error, suggesting that effect learning did not affect reliability. [Conclusion] A standardized protocol for assessment of mandibular ROM in a neutral craniocervical position obtained good inter- and intra-rater reliability for MMO and protrusion and moderate inter- and intra-rater reliability for lateral excursions.Key words: Reliability, Range of motion, Temporomandibular joint     

Intra- and inter-rater reliability for judgement of cough following citric acid inhalation

Abstract

This study investigated the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of subjective judgements of cough in patients following inhalation of citric acid. Eleven speech-language pathologists (SLPs) currently using cough reflex testing in their clinical practice (experienced raters) and 34 SLPs with no experience using cough reflex testing (inexperienced raters) were recruited to the study. Participants provided a rating of strong, weak, or absent to 10 video segments of cough responses elicited by inhalation of nebulized citric acid. The same video segments presented in a different sequence were re-evaluated by the same clinicians following a 15-minute break. Inter-rater reliability for experienced raters was calculated with a Fleiss’ generalized kappa of .487; intra-rater reliability was higher with a kappa of .700. Inexperienced raters showed similar reliability, with kappa values for inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of .363 and .618, respectively. In conclusion, SLPs demonstrate only fair-to-moderate reliability in subjectively judging a patient's cough response to citric acid. Experience in making cough judgements does not improve inter-rater reliability significantly. Further validity and reliability research, including an evaluation of the effect of training on judgement reliability, would be beneficial for guiding clinical policies.     

Reliability of postural measures in elite badminton players using Posture Pro 8

The Posture Pro software is used for photogrammetry assessment of posture and has been commercially available for several years. Along with symmetry-related measures, a Posture Number® is calculated to reflect the sum of postural deviations. Our aim was to investigate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of measures extracted using the Posture Pro 8 software without using reference markers on subjects. Four raters assessed the standing posture of 40 badminton players (20 males, 20 females) from anterior, lateral, and posterior photographs. Thirty-three postural measures were extracted using visual landmarks as guide. Reliability was quantified using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and typical error of measurement (TEM). Overall, the intra-rater reliability was considered good to excellent for nearly all measures. However, only two measures had excellent inter-rater reliability, with 13 and 18 measures exhibiting good and fair inter-rater reliability, respectively. Posture Pro specific measures (n = 9) exhibited good-to-excellent intra-rater and fair-to-excellent inter-rater reliability, with small-to-moderate and small-to-large TEM, respectively. Overall, the Posture Pro 8 software can be considered a reliable tool for assessing a range of posture-relevant measures from photographs, particularly when performed by the same examiner. The Posture Number® demonstrated generally acceptable intra- and inter-rater reliability. Nonetheless, investigations on the validity, sensitivity, and interpretation of this measure are essential to confirm its clinical relevance.     

Assessment of neonatal resuscitation skills: a reliable and valid scoring system

OBJECTIVE: To study the reliability and validity of a scoring instrument for the assessment of neonatal resuscitation skills in a training setting. METHODS: Fourteen paediatric residents performed a neonatal resuscitation on a manikin, while being recorded with a video camera. The videotapes were analysed using an existing scoring instrument with an established face and content validity, adjusted for use in a training setting. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed by comparing the ratings of the videotapes of three raters, one of who rated the videotapes twice. Intra-class coefficients (ICC) were calculated for the sum score, percentages of agreement and kappa coefficients for the individual items. To study construct validity, the performance of a second resuscitation of by residents was assessed after they had received feedback on their first performance. RESULTS: The ICC were 0.95 and 0.77 for intra- and inter-rater reliability, respectively. The median percentage of intra-rater agreement was 100%; inter-rater agreement 78.6-84.0%. The median kappa was 0.85 for intra-rater reliability, and 0.42-0.59 for inter-rater reliability. Residents showed a 10% improvement (95% confidence interval -4; 23%) on performance of a second resuscitation, which supports the instrument's construct validity. CONCLUSION: A useful and valid instrument with good intra-rater and reasonable inter-rater reliability is now available for the assessment of neonatal resuscitation skills in a training setting. Its reliability can be improved by using a more advanced manikin and by training of the raters.     

Inter-Rater,Intra-Rater,and Inter-Machine Reliability of Quantitative Ultrasound Measurements of the Patellar Tendon

The use of ultrasound (US) to perform quantitative measurements of musculoskeletal tissues requires accurate and reliable measurements between investigators and ultrasound machines. The objective of this study was to evaluate inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of patellar tendon measurements between providers with different levels of US experience and inter-machine reliability of US machines. Sixteen subjects without a history of knee pain were evaluated with US examinations of the patellar tendon. Each tendon was scanned independently by two investigators using two different ultrasound machines. Tendon length and cross-sectional area (CSA) were obtained, and examiners were blinded to each other's results. Tendon length was measured using a validated system involving surface markers and calipers, and CSA was measured using each machine's measuring software. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to determine reliability of measurements between observers, where ICC > 0.75 was considered good and ICC > 0.9 was considered excellent. Inter-rater reliability between sonographers was excellent and revealed an ICC of 0.90 to 0.92 for patellar tendon CSA and an ICC of 0.96 for tendon length. ICC for intra-rater reliability of tendon CSA was also generally excellent, with ICC between 0.87 and 0.96. Inter-machine reliability was excellent, with ICC of 0.91–0.98 for tendon CSA and 0.96–0.98 for tendon length. Bland–Altman plots were constructed to measure validity and demonstrated a mean difference between sonographers of 0.03 mm² for CSA measurements and 0.2 mm for tendon length. Using well-defined scanning protocols, a novice and an experienced musculoskeletal sonographer attained high levels of inter-rater agreement, with similarly excellent results for intra-rater and inter-machine reliability. To our knowledge, this study is the first to report inter-machine reliability in the setting of quantitative musculoskeletal ultrasound.     

The reliability of measuring quadriceps cross-sectional area with compound B ultrasound scanning

Many therapists use thigh circumference as a measure of quadriceps size to evaluate the effect of an injury or effectiveness of an intervention. However, this technique has been shown to be unreliable, thus more accurate methods of measuring muscle size are required. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of measuring quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) with static compound B ultrasound scanning at the level of the mid-thigh. Repeated measures of known linear distances and CSAs were made with a planimetry device. Both face and criterion validity were demonstrated indicating that the device is reliable when measuring CSAs. A single rater located quadriceps muscle borders and measured CSAs on a series of ultrasound scans. A mean coefficient of variation (%CV = 1.7) was observed, signifying high intra-rater reliability. Two raters performed six scans on each of 15 subjects. Initial observation of these results suggest that the measurement of quadriceps CSA with compound B ultrasound scanning is reliable, mean %CVs = 2.8 and 1.9 for the two raters and 2.4 when their results were combined. When raters performed scans on 18 subjects on two occasions on the same day intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were high, 0.991 and 0.980 for raters A and B, respectively. Paired Student's t-tests revealed a significant difference (p<0.05) for Rater B between CSAs measured for initial and relocated scans. However, this difference was calculated as 1.4–2.9% and was not of clinical importance. A significant difference (p<.0.05) was observed between measurements of CSAs made by both raters on the same subject. A calibration factor was calculated for transforming the measurements of Rater B, the use of which gave comparable values. ICCs using a fixed model for inter-rater reliability were 0.963 and 0.974 for actual and trans' formed values, respectively. This study observed differences between measures obtained by different raters and recommends that the calculation and employment of a calibration factor may be useful when comparing sequential measures made by different raters.     

上肢动作研究量表在脑卒中患者中的信度

目的探讨上肢动作研究量表（ARAT）在脑卒中患者中的评价者间信度、评价者内信度和内在一致性。方法由两位评价者各自独立的对30例慢性脑卒中患者进行ARAT的评价。检验ARAT的评价者间信度、评价者内信度和内在一致性。结果ARAT的评价者间信度和评价者内信度ICC值分别为0.992和0.987。内在一致性分析结果Cronbach＇sα系数为0.936。结论ARAT在脑卒中患者中具有良好的评价者间信度、评价者内信度和内在一致性。     

Intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities of real-time acceleration gait analysis system

Purpose: The purposes of this study were to construct a real-time acceleration gait analysis system equipped with software to analyse real-time trunk acceleration during walking and to examine the intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities of the this system. Methods: This system has been comprised of an accelerometer, an acceleration amplifier, a transmitter, two foot switches, a receiver and a personal computer installed with the real-time acceleration analysis software. The acceleration signals received were analysed using the real-time acceleration analysis software, and gait parameters were calculated. The subjects were 20 healthy individuals and two raters. The intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities of the measurement results obtained from this system were examined by performing intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland–Altman analysis. Results: The intra-rater and inter-rater ICCs ranged from 0.61 to 0.92 in any gait parameters. In the Bland–Altman analysis, neither fixed nor proportional bias was found in any of the gait parameters. Conclusions: From the ICC and Bland–Altman analysis results, the gait measurement using this system clearly demonstrates that the intra-rater and inter-rater measurements had good reproducibility. Owing to this system, we can improve the clinical efficiency of gait analysis and gait training for physiotherapy.

• Implication for Rehabilitation

• This study focused on the advantage of a gait analysis method using an accelerometer and constructed a gait analysis system that calculates real-time gait parameters from trunk acceleration measurements during walking. The gait analysis using this system has good intra-rater and inter-rater reliabilities, and using this system can improve the clinical efficiency of gait analysis and gait training.