Indications and results of chemotherapy in children with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease after liver transplantation

Among 39 posttransplant lymphoproliferative diseases (PTLD) in a cohort of 450 pediatric liver transplant recipients, 3 had a malignant lymphoma, unresponsive to arrest of immunosuppression and to gancyclovir, interferon, and anti-interleukin 6 antibodies. Lymphoma appeared 20, 46, and 96 months posttransplantation and 16, 43, and 90 months after primary Epstein-Barr virus infection. In one case, the patient had histological progression from plasmacytic hyperplasia PTLD, concomitant with symptomatic primary infection, to Burkitt-like lymphoma 43 months later. These three patients received five courses of chemotherapy, after a cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone regimen for Burkitt-like or LH 89 scheme for Hodgkin-like PTLDs. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, and all three were free of disease and without immunosuppression 19, 14, and 4 months after chemotherapy. In Burkitt-like or Hodgkin-like PTLDs, immunomodulatory or antiviral drugs were inefficient. Chemotherapy is indicated and can be safely and successfully used. Long-term arrest of immunosuppression seems feasible without graft rejection.     

Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder in pediatric liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features of risk factors for posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in pediatric liver transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 1996 and June 2002, among 41 pediatric patients who underwent liver transplantation, 7 died in the postoperative period. Thirty-five patients, including 1 patient who died of PTLD, were reviewed. Based on the serology results, patients were divided into a high-risk group (EBV-naive recipients of EBV-positive grafts) and a low-risk group (patients other than those in the high-risk group). RESULTS: Five of 41 patients (12.2%) developed PTLD. All of them belonged to the high-risk group. The incidence of PTLD in the high-risk group was 31.3% (5 of 16). The mean duration between operation and diagnosis for PTLD was 9.8 months. Primary EBV infection developed at a median of 6 months after transplantation. Three of 5 patients developed rejection before the diagnosis of PTLD. One patient was diagnosed with laryngeal and gastrointestinal PTLD, whereas the other 4 had gastrointestinal PTLD. They experienced the following symptoms and signs: anemia (100%), hypoalbuminemia (100%), fever (80%), diarrhea (80%), gastrointestinal bleeding (80%), and anorexia (60%). CONCLUSION: The common features of PTLD development were as follows: (1) EBV-positive donors placed into EBV-naive recipients, (2) primary EBV infection approximately 6 months after transplantation, (3) young age, 1 year old at operation, and (4) requirement for intensive posttransplantation immunosuppression.     

Humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (Rituximab) treatment for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

INTRODUCTION: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) is a consequence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and is a B-cell hyperplasia with CD-20 positive lymphocytes. The treatment of PTLD includes reduction/withdrawal of immunosuppression and chemotherapy. This study reports our center experience with humanized monoclonal antibody against CD-20 (Rituximab) for the treatment of PTLD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight cases of PTLD after solid organ transplantation [six kidney, one kidney/pancreas (KP) and one liver] occurred between September 1998 and October 2001. The mean time between transplant and the diagnosis of PTLD was 57.3 months (range 3 months to 10 yr). Five patients underwent cadaveric transplant, five males and six were Caucasians with mean age of 48 yr (range 20-67 yr). RESULTS: The clinical presentation was as follows: lymphadenopathy--5, gastrointestinal bleeding--2 and tonsillar enlargement--1. The diagnosis was made by a lymph node biopsy in five, a gastric ulcer biopsy in two and a tonsillar biopsy in one case. Six of them had polymorphous, two had monoclonal B-cell lymphoma, and all were positive for CD-20. Six were related to EBV, documented by latent membrane protein (LMP) or Epstein-Barr encoded RNA (EBER) staining. Immunosuppression at the time of PTLD diagnosis consisted of tacrolimus in six cases and cyclosporine A (CsA) in two with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine--3 each and sirolimus--1. Rituximab was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m2 once a week for 4 wk. There were no side effects seen with this therapy. Immunosuppression was reduced in all patients. Complete remission was observed in seven cases (one required two courses). One patient who did not respond received chemotherapy. Patients were followed for a mean period of 22.5 months (range 10-45 months post-PTLD diagnosis. At the last follow-up all eight patients were alive, seven with a functioning graft and one on maintenance dialysis. Three of these patients had been in remission for more than 2.5 yr. CONCLUSION: Rituximab is an effective agent in the treatment of PTLD without the morbidity characteristic of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy should be reserved only for those refractory to Rituximab therapy.     

Epstein-Barr virus-negative lymphoproliferate disorders in long-term survivors after heart, kidney, and liver transplant

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant patients undergoing long-term immunosuppression have high risk of developing lymphomas. The pathogenesis of the late-occurring posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) have not yet been extensively investigated. METHODS: We studied 15 patients who developed PTLD after a median of 79 months (range 22-156 months) after organ transplant. Clonality, presence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) genome, and genetic lesions were evaluated by Southern blot analysis or polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: All monomorphic PTLD and two of three polymorphic PTLD showed a monoclonal pattern. Overall, 44% of samples demonstrated the presence of the EBV genome. Within monomorphic PTLD, the EBV-positive lymphomas were even lower (31%). A c-myc gene rearrangement was found in two cases (13%), whereas none of the 15 samples so far investigated showed bcl-1, bcl-2, or bcl-6 rearrangement. The modulation of immunosuppression was ineffective in all patients with monomorphic PTLD independent of the presence of the EBV genome. The clinical outcome after chemotherapy was poor because of infectious complications and resistant disease. With a median follow-up of 4 months, the median survival time of these patients was 7 months. CONCLUSIONS: Late occurring lymphomas could be considered an entity distinct from PTLD, occurring within 1 year of transplant, because they show a histological and clinical presentation similar to lymphomas of immunocompetent subjects, are frequently negative for the EBV genome, are invariably clonal, and may rearrange the c-myc oncogene. New therapeutic strategies are required to reduce the mortality rate, and new modalities of long-lasting immunosuppression are called for.     

Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders Following Liver Transplantation: Incidence, Risk Factors and Survival

This study investigates retrospectively the incidence, risk factors and mortality of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) in adult orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. Among 1206 OLT recipients at a single institution, 37 developed a PTLD. The incidence of PTLD was highest during the first 18 months and relatively constant thereafter with cumulative incidence of 1.1% at 18 months and 4.7% at 15 years. The risk of PTLD was approximately 10% to 15% of the risk of death without PTLD. During the first 4 years following OLT, PTLD were predominantly related to EBV, while afterward most PTLD were EBV negative. Significant risk factors for PTLD in OLT recipients were transplantation for acute fulminant hepatitis during the first 18 months following OLT (HR = 2.6, p = 0.007), and rejection therapy with high-dose steroids (HR = 4.5, p = 0.049) and OKT3 (HR = 3.9, p = 0.016) during the previous year. Therapy with high-dose steroids or OKT3 (HR = 3.6, p = 0.0071) were also significant risk factors for PTLD-associated mortality. OLT recipients remain at risk for PTLD years after transplantation. The strong association of PTLD with rejection therapy and the worse post-PTLD prognosis among recipients of rejection therapy indicate the need to balance the risk of immunosuppression against the risk of PTLD following rejection treatment.     

Treatment of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease with rituximab: the remission, the relapse, and the complication.

BACKGROUND: Rituximab, a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is a promising new tool for the treatment of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), especially for patients transplanted with rejection prone transplants of vital organs, such as patients after lung transplantation. Thus far, no major complications have been described. We treated three lung transplant recipients with Rituximab because of PTLD. METHODS: Patients were treated with four weekly doses of 375 mg/m2 of Rituximab. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA was monitored with quantitative-competitive polymerase chain reaction and circulating B cells with flow cytometry. RESULTS: Treatment with Rituximab resulted in a complete remission in all patients without signs of or progression of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Patient 1 relapsed after 2 months with a partly CD20-negative PTLD but is in stable remission after radiotherapy. Patient 2 is in complete remission 16 months after treatment, but patient 3 developed a hypogammaglobulinemia and died of invasive aspergillosis after 6 months. EBV DNA was detectable in the blood samples of patients 2 and 3 before treatment with Rituximab and became negative instantly after Rituximab. In all three patients, B cells are absent in the peripheral blood 7 months (at death), 16 months, and 16 months after treatment with Rituximab. Antiproliferating agents, such as mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), might prolong B-cell depletion. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab was effective for the treatment of PTLD without progression of transplant dysfunction in our patients. Complications were a partly CD20-negative relapse of PTLD and a hypogammaglobulinemia. Attention should be paid to immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels, especially in patients treated with antiproliferating agents such as MMF.     

Treatment of PTLD with Rituximab or Chemotherapy

Information regarding treatment of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) beyond reduction in immunosuppression (RI) is limited. We retrospectively evaluated patients receiving rituximab and/or chemotherapy for PTLD for response, time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). Thirty-five patients met inclusion criteria. Twenty-two underwent rituximab treatment, with overall response rate (ORR) 68%. Median TTF was not reached at 19 months and estimated OS was 31 months. In univariable analysis, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity predicted response and TTF. LDH elevation predicted shorter OS. No patient died of rituximab toxicity and all patients who progressed underwent further treatment with chemotherapy. Twenty-three patients received chemotherapy. ORR was 74%, median TTF was 10.5 months and estimated OS was 42 months. Prognostic factors for response included stage, LDH and allograft involvement by tumor. These factors and lack of complete response (CR) predicted poor survival. Twenty-six percent of the patients receiving chemotherapy died of toxicity. Rituximab and chemotherapy are effective in patients with PTLD who fail or do not tolerate RI. While rituximab is well tolerated, toxicity of chemotherapy is marked. PTLD patients requiring therapy beyond RI should be considered for rituximab, especially with EBV-positive disease. Chemotherapy should be reserved for patients who fail rituximab, have EBV-negative tumors or need a rapid response.     

Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder Following Pancreas Transplantation

The incidence, risk factors and impact on patient and graft survival were evaluated for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) among 212 pancreas transplant recipients. Thirteen (6.1%) developed PTLD during 71 ± 27 months follow-up. Cumulative incidences of PTLD at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years posttransplant were 4.2%, 5.3%, 6.0% and 7.0%, respectively. Incidence of PTLD was lower for recipients of simultaneous pancreas kidney compared to pancreas after kidney transplant or pancreas transplant alone, though not significantly so. Recipient Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) seronegativity and number of doses of depleting antibody therapy administered at transplant were associated with increased risk of PTLD, while recipient age, gender, transplant type, cytomegalovirus mismatch maintenance immunosuppression type and treated acute rejection were not. All 13 cases underwent immunosuppression reduction, and 10 received anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. During follow-up, 10/13 (77%) responded to treatment with complete remission, while 3 (23%) died as a result of PTLD. Patient and graft survivals did not differ for recipients with and without PTLD. The strong association of PTLD with EBV-seronegativity requires considering this risk factor when evaluating and monitoring pancreas transplant recipients. With reduction of immunosuppression and anti-CD20 therapy, survival for pancreas transplant recipients with PTLD was substantially better than previously reported.     

Hodgkin lymphoma-like posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (HL-like PTLD) simulates monomorphic B-cell PTLD both clinically and pathologically

Although Hodgkin lymphoma-like posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (HL-like PTLD) has been grouped with classic Hodgkin lymphoma type PTLD (HL-PTLD), controversy remains as to whether it is truly a form of HL or whether it should be more appropriately classified as a form of B-cell PTLD. Because only few cases of HL-like PTLD have been reported, their pathologic nature and clinical behavior have not been well defined. This report characterized 5 cases of HL-like PTLD with respect to their immunophenotype, EBV status, clonality, and clinical outcome. All of the patients were male, with ages ranging from 1.5 to 55 years at diagnosis. PTLD developed from 4 months to 6 years following solid organ transplantation (3 hearts, 1 kidney, 1 liver), and involved both nodal and extranodal sites. All were EBV-related (EBER+) with the large neoplastic cells CD20/CD79a positive but CD15 negative. Immunoglobulin gene rearrangements were detected in 3 of 5 tested. All patients were managed by initial reduction/withdrawal of immunosuppression, with 2 also receiving chemotherapy for non-HL. Three patients died of progressive disease within 2 to 3 months after diagnosis, 1 is alive and well 2 years later, and the fifth was disease free but died of unrelated causes (graft coronary disease) 2 years later. We conclude that, although HL-like PTLD morphologically simulates classic HL PTLD, there are important immunophenotypic, molecular genetic, and clinical differences, suggesting it is in fact most often a B-cell PTLD. Distinction between HL and HL-like PTLD may be important for clinical management and prognosis.     

Outcomes of kidney retransplantation in recipients with prior post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

Post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is an uncommon but serious complication of solid organ transplantation. Reduction in immunosuppression is the mainstay of PTLD treatment, but it may precipitate graft loss. Retransplantation remains controversial, as immunosuppression resumption may trigger PTLD relapse. Herein, we describe the experience of eight patients who underwent kidney retransplantation after successful PTLD treatment. Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) serology was not known before the first transplantation. PTLD was diagnosed 62.5 months (range 5–323 months) after transplantation and was confined to the renal allograft (n = 1), lymph nodes (n = 2), gastrointestinal tract (n = 4), or central nervous system (n = 1). Immunosuppression tapering (8/8), chemotherapy (6/8), oral cavity lymphoma excision (1/8), and allograft nephrectomy (1/8) led to hematological remission in all patients. Retransplantation was performed at a median of 55.5 months (range 29–95   months) after PTLD diagnosis. After a median follow‐up of 62.5 months (range 2–125 months) allograft survival was 87.5% (seven functioning grafts, one failed graft from chronic rejection), with no recurrence of PTLD. In all, five patients remain alive; the other three died from causes other than PTLD. In conclusion, kidney retransplantation appears to be safe in patients with prior PTLD and without major risk of hematological recurrence provided that PTLD has remitted.     

Operative Endoscopy for Treatment of Native Rectal Post-Transplantation Lymphoproliferative Disease After Adult Small Bowel Transplantation: A Case Report

Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is often recognized in transplant recipients. Small bowel recipients are prone to develop GI disease due to the higher incidence of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) infection and enteritis as a consequence of heavy immunosuppressive regimens. So far treatment has been based on anti-CD20 therapy (Rituximab), modulation of immunosuppression, antiviral therapy (Gancyclovir), and surgery (up to allograft enterectomy if necessary), whereas endoscopy is usually used to perform the diagnosis via biopsy. We report a case of an adult small bowel recipient, who underwent transplantation due to Gardner's Syndrome 6 years earlier and was EBV positive. A native rectal PTLD was treated using opertive endoscopy combined with antiviral therapy using 4 courses of Rituximab for positive pelvic lymph nodes in addition to reduced immunosuppression. Two years after treatment the recipient is alive and disease-free with a functional graft.     

Successful outcome with a "quintuple approach" of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder

BACKGROUND: The treatment of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) remains empirical. We review our treatment of seven cases of PTLD consisting of five interventions: 1) reduction of immunosuppression; 2) antiviral drugs; 3) interferon-alpha; 4) gamma-globulins; and 5) anti-CD19 monoclonal antibodies. METHODS AND RESULTS; Seven consecutive patients who had undergone a simultaneous pancreas-kidney, liver, heart, or kidney transplantation were treated. One patient acquired a primary EBV infection with an oligoclonal immunoblastic lymphoma early after pancreas-kidney transplantation; all others developed a monoclonal polymorphic or immunoblastic lymphoma 2 to 123 months after transplantation. In all patients extranodal sites were involved, in three the graft was also involved. Five patients received the full quintuple approach and all rapidly obtained a complete remission (CR) with a median follow-up of 31 months (7-74 months). Of the two patients who did not receive interferon-alpha for fear of graft rejection one responded slowly with a CR after 7 months, and the other obtained a rapid CR followed by a relapse at 4 months. All three patients with a liver or heart transplant could keep their graft. All patients are still alive with a median follow-up of 31 months (7-74 months). CONCLUSION: This combined approach resulted in a favorable outcome in patients with high risk monoclonal PTLD after solid organ transplantation.     

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in pediatric renal transplantation

Of 84 renal transplants performed in our center since 1986, six recipients (7.1%) developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). All received quadruple immunosuppression with Minnesota anti-lymphoblastic globulin or anti-thymocyte globulin, methylprednisolone, cyclosporine, and azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. Five were seronegative for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) when they received their renal transplant. All patients received prophylactic acyclovir treatment postrenal transplant and none developed a cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. All patients were positive for EBV by serology and polymerase chain reaction at the time of diagnosis of PTLD. Clinical features at presentation included fever (6/6), adenopathy (4/6), hypertrophied adenoids (4/6), liver involvement (2/6), and allograft involvement (2/6), 2–78 months (4/6<6 months) postrenal transplant. Histopathology of PTLD tissue revealed T cell rich/ Hodgkin disease-like B cell PTLD in one patient, polymorphic PTLD in four, and monomorphic (large B cell lymphoma) PTLD in one. Immunophenotyping of the PTLD biopsy specimen revealed predominant T cells in three, mixed B and T cells in two patients, and B cell in one. No aneuploid populations were identified by flow cytometric DNA ploidy assay. DNA from the PTLD tissue revealed weak to moderate IgH gene rearrangement in four of six patients but no T cell receptor β-chain or c-myc gene rearrangement on Southern blot analysis. The child with monomorphic (large B cell lymphoma) PTLD was clonal with λ light chain restriction on immunophenotyping. Treatment consisted of reduced immunosuppression and ganciclovir/ acyclovir in all patients. CMV hyperimmune globulin was used as an adjunctive therapy in two patients. Chemotherapy was needed in only one patient. A single rejection episode occurred in two children following reduction in immunosuppression, which reversed following intravenous methylprednisolone therapy. PTLD resolved in all patients and at present all patients are alive with functional grafts 2–54 months post diagnosis. Our experience suggests that reduced immunosuppression and anti-viral treatment is adequate in most cases of PTLD, but chemotherapy and hyperimmune globulin therapy may be beneficial in cases resistant to first-line therapy. Since all but one of our patients were EBV seronegative at the time of transplant, vigilance is especially important for early detection of PTLD in this group of the pediatric renal transplant population. Received: 17 November 1998 / Revised: 4 February 1999 / Accepted: 4 February 1999     

Cellular Immunity to Epstein-Barr Virus in Liver Transplant Recipients Treated with Rituximab for Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease

The evaluation of long-term cellular immunity to EBV in pediatric orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients after treatment with the humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (Rituximab) has not yet been explored. At our institution, one child with EBV-related mononucleosis-like syndrome and five children with polymorphic-EBV-PTLD occurring 6-88 months after OLT were treated with Rituximab. Treatment was well tolerated. All children achieved complete remission. After Rituximab, B-lymphocytes were undetectable in the peripheral blood and EBV-load, monitored with real-time PCR, decreased to undetectable levels in all children from >4000 copies/microg DNA at diagnosis. Four to eight months after Rituximab, EBV-load increased (>4000 copies/microg DNA) in four children, and PTLD recurred in three. Their frequency of EBV-specific T-cell precursors, measured by Elispot analysis, remained lower than in healthy controls. Rituximab effectively induced regression of PTLD in OLT recipients. However, EBV-specific T-cell immunocompetence, which may be crucial for the long-term control of EBV-mediated proliferation, did not improve.     

Malignant neoplasms in cardiac transplant recipients

Purpose: Heart transplant recipients have an increased risk of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) associated with monoclonal antilymphocyte (OKT₃) immunosuppression and Epstein-Barr viral (EBV) infections. These studies were undertaken to determine whether polyclonal antilymphocyte therapy can reduce the incidence of malignant neoplasia.Methods: We reviewed our experience with polyclonal induction therapy to assess the risk of malignant neoplasms in 223 transplant recipients between April 1985 and September 1998. Posttransplant immunosuppression therapy employed either polyclonal antilymphocyte or antithymocyte globulin given as 10mg/kg/day in divided doses for 3 days followed by cyclosporine, azothioprine, and steroids. OKT₃ was used in only 2 patients for persistent rejection.Results: Twenty-nine patients developed invasive malignant neoplasms (a mean of 57.9 months posttransplant; range 7 to 125). Invasive malignancies included carcinoma of the lung (7 patients), colon (3), kidney (3), bladder (2), prostate (1), squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue (1), malignant melanoma (2), Kaposi’s sarcoma (1), and squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (1). Five patients developed lymphoma: 3 patients had PTLD, 2 patients had Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Positive EBV IgG titers (>4:1) were found in 3 patients, but only 1 of these developed PTLD and none of these patients received OKT₃. Of the 29 patients with invasive malignancy, 13 (45%) died secondary to their malignancy; 5 died of unrelated causes (sepsis, myocardial infarction, and organ failure); and 11 are alive after surgical excision and/or chemotherapy. The age-adjusted incidence of invasive neoplasm was 7.33 (95% 5.95 confidence interval 8.09) times as great as rates for the general population in the State of Michigan between 1988 and 1995.Conclusion: While induction polyclonal antilymphocyte therapy may reduce the risk of PTLD, the incidence of posttransplant malignancy remains high. A vigilant cancer surveillance protocol is mandatory in these high-risk patients.     

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma associated with Epstein-Barr virus following cardiac transplant

Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) eventually occur in approximately 5% of all organ transplant recipients. Most of cases are B-cell proliferations associated with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). T-cell PTLDs are relatively rare, although some estimate that up to 14% of posttransplantation malignant lymphomas are T-cell lymphomas even though only a few of these cases are described in the literature. A literature review found only 77 cases of T-cell PTLD, including 1 case following cardiac transplant, 15 cases associated with EBV, and only 1 case of anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). This single ALCL case followed a liver transplant, was of the T-cell phenotype, and was EBV negative. In this report, we describe a 14-year-old male who developed an EBV-positive, T-cell PTLD of the ALCL subtype after a period of 14 years following cardiac transplant. Immunohistochemical staining established the T-cell origin of the neoplasm with strong expression of CD45, CD3, CD43, and CD2 and also showed expression of CD30 consistent with the histologic features that suggested ALCL. EBER in situ hybridization detected the presence of the EBV. Polymerase chain reaction analysis for T-cell receptor-gamma gene rearrangements confirmed the T-cell lineage of this lymphoma. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of an EBV-positive T cell lymphoma of the anaplastic large cell subtype following organ transplant.     

Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder in liver recipients: characteristics, management, and outcome.

Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a well-recognized complication of organ transplantation. The aim of this study, performed over 9 years, was to examine the histopathological findings, clinical course, and outcome of patients who, having undergone orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), developed PTLD. The sample included 7 adult liver allograft recipients (1.7%), 4 men and 3 women, with a mean age of 53 years (range, 40 to 61 years) who developed PTLD 1 to 36 months post-OLT (mean, 6 months). Four patients received either antithymocyte globulin as primary immunosuppression or OKT3 for steroid-resistant cellular rejection. Four patients had localized hepatic tumor with or without regional lymph node involvement, 2 patients had extralymphoreticular disease (head of pancreas and chest wall), and 1 patient had spleen and lymph node involvement. All tumors were B-cell lymphomas; three polymorphic and four monomorphic. Clonality was assessed by immunostaining for kappa and lambda and gene rearrangement. Monoclonality was found in 4 patients and polyclonality in 2 (1 of whom progressed to monoclonality); in 2 patients, clonality could not be determined. Immunohistochemistry findings for the presence of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-determined nuclear antigen and the latent membrane protein 1 were noted in lymphoma tissue in 6 patients. Immunosuppressive therapy was decreased in all patients. Polyclonal tumors were treated with acyclovir (1 patient is in complete remission and 1 patient died), and monoclonal tumors with systemic chemotherapy (2 patients are in complete remission and 2 patients died). One patient was treated with monoclonal antibodies (CD20) but failed to respond, and 1 patient was treated with excision and is in complete remission. The mortality rate was 43%; for the remainder, median survival is 21 months (range, 10 to 42 months). We conclude that PTLD may re-present early after OLT. EBV has a special role in the pathogenesis, combined with immunosuppressive therapy. The outcome is poor, and new therapeutic approaches are needed.     

Rituximab as treatment of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in patients who underwent small bowel/multivisceral transplantation: report of three cases

This report describes three cases of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in multivisceral/small bowel transplant patients treated with rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies). In two cases (one of which was a B-cell lymphoma) a good response to therapy was achieved. A third case (with polymorphic PTLD with low CD20 expression) developed a refractory rejection and PTLD was still documented on graftectomy. Rituximab was well tolerated, and a reduction of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viral load was documented by quantitive competitive-EBV polymerase chain reaction. Efficacy of therapy needs to be assessed in controlled studies.     

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders after lung transplantation: first-line treatment with rituximab may induce complete remission

BACKGROUND: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are potentially lethal complications of solid organ transplantation. We, here, report on our experience with rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, as first-line treatment for PTLD in six lung transplant recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two of the patients developed PTLD during the first year after transplantation, while four developed late-onset PTLD. One patient presented with PTLD localized to the graft, one had unilateral cervical lymph nodes, and the others presented with multi-organ involvement. All patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Immunosuppressive therapy was reduced and rituximab was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m(2)/wk for 4 wk. RESULTS: One patient did not respond to the first two courses of rituximab, received conventional chemotherapy, and achieved complete remission; four patients achieved complete remission after four courses with a median relapse-free survival of 34 months (range: 14-55); and one patient did not respond and died. The diagnosis of complete remission was established by conventional imaging techniques combined to whole-body positron emission tomography scan. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that reduction in immunosuppression combined to first-line treatment with rituximab may induce long-term complete remission in lung transplant recipients presenting PTLD.     

Circulating Epstein‐Barr virus DNA to monitor lymphoproliferative disease following pediatric liver transplantation

Abstract Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) infection can induce uncontrolled lymphocyte B proliferation in immunosuppressed transplant patients. Monitoring circulating EBV‐infected lymphocytes can help in identifying patients at risk of post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). Circulating EBV genome levels were determined in 54 liver transplant pediatric recipients. Ten patients had more than 500 EBV genome/10⁵ peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and exhibited clinical manifestations of EBV infection; three developed PTLD. To treat EBV infection, the level of immunosuppression was reduced and acute rejection developed in 4 patients. Three were treated with steroid and one had to be switched from cyclosporine to tacrolimus. Treatment of acute rejection was associated with increases in circulating EBV genome. None of the patients with less than 500 EBV genome/10⁵ PBL developed PTLD or EBV infection. Monitoring of EBV DNA is useful in the management of EBV infection and PTLD following pediatric liver transplantation. EBV infection should be treated in ways which do not expose patients to the risk of rejection.