Cyclosporine Sparing with Mycophenolate Mofetil, Daclizumab and Corticosteroids in Renal Allograft Recipients: The CAESAR Study

Although the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus are highly effective immunosuppressants, they are associated with serious side effects. There is great interest in immunosuppressive regimens that permit reduction or elimination of CNIs, while maintaining adequate immunosuppression and acceptable acute rejection rates. Patients (n = 536) receiving their first renal allograft were randomized to one of three immunosuppressant regimens: daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), corticosteroids (CS) and low-dose CsA (target trough levels of 50-100 ng/mL), weaned from month 4 and withdrawn by month 6; daclizumab, MMF, CS and low-dose CsA; or MMF, CS and standard-dose CsA. Mean GFR 12 months after transplantation (primary end point) was not statistically different in the CsA withdrawal and low-dose CsA groups (both 50.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) vs. the standard-dose CsA group (48.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). At 12 months, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was significantly higher in the CsA withdrawal group (38%) vs. the low- or standard-dose CsA groups (25.4% and 27.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). In summary, a regimen of continuous low-dose CsA with MMF, CS and daclizumab induction is a clinically safe and effective immunosuppressive regimen in renal transplant recipients.     

Primary immunosuppression with tacrolimus and low-dose mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients

Both tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are potent immunosuppressive agents used in combination for prevention of acute rejection in renal transplantation. We studied the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus/MMF-based primary immunosuppression as well as their pharmacokinetics (PK) in Chinese renal transplant recipients. Oral tacrolimus was initiated at about 0.2 mg/kg/d, dose which was adjusted to achieve target trough levels of 10 to 20 ng/mL at 3 months and 5 to 10 ng/mL thereafter. The patients also received MMF (0.5 g bid) and prednisolone. PK profiles were studied at 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months posttransplant. Blood samples were taken at 0 (predose), 20, 40, 60, 75, and 90 minutes and 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours postdose for each profile. Plasma MPA and whole blood tacrolimus levels were determined by HPLC and EMIT methods respectively. Eight patients were studied with mean follow-up of 16.1 +/- 2.4 months. One patient (12.5%) experienced a borderline acute rejection episode. Both 1-year graft and patient survival rates were 100%. Posttransplant diabetes, diarrhea, and hand tremor occurred in 12.5%, 12.5%, and 37.5%, respectively. No patient had an opportunistic infection. Tacrolimus trough concentrations showed a fair correlation with AUC(0-12h) (R(2) = 0.587). Mean MPA AUC values at 1, 3, and 6 months were 40.5 +/- 9.4, 44.4 +/- 17.3, and 57.2 +/- 20.7 mug*h/mL, respectively (P = .0486, n = 7). In conclusion, primary immunosuppression with tacrolimus, low-dose MMF (0.5 g bid), and prednisolone is effective and safe with adequate systemic MPA exposure in renal transplant recipients.     

Steroid-Withdrawal at 3 Days After Renal Transplantation with Anti-IL-2 Receptor α Therapy: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study

Steroids have been included in most immunosuppressive regimens after renal transplantation, but are feared for their side-effects. We conducted a prospective multicenter study to investigate whether it is feasible to withdraw steroids early after transplantation with the use of anti-IL-2Ralpha induction, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). A total of 364 patients were randomized to receive either two doses of daclizumab (1 mg/kg) and, for the first 3 days, 100 mg of prednisolone (daclizumab group n = 186), or steroids (tapered to 0 mg at week 16; controls n = 178). All patients received tacrolimus and MMF. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 12 months was not different between the daclizumab group (15%) and the controls (14%) (95% confidence interval of difference: -6 to + 8%, NS). Graft survival at 12 months was comparable in the two groups (daclizumab group: 91%; controls: 90%). Mean arterial blood pressure, serum lipids, and incidence of patients with hyperglycemia were temporary lower in the daclizumab group compared with controls. The immunosuppressive regimen of the daclizumab group was associated with increased costs. In conclusion, with the use of anti-IL-2Ra induction and daily therapy with tacrolimus and MMF it is feasible to withdraw steroids at 3 days after renal transplantation.     

Alemtuzumab induction with tacrolimus monotherapy in de novo renal transplantation

OBJECTIVES: Alemtuzumab is increasingly being used as induction therapy for kidney transplantation, allowing immunosuppression minimization. This study examined the efficacy of alemtuzumab induction followed by low-dose tacrolimus monotherapy in standard risk primary kidney transplant patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort of primary standard risk renal transplant recipients were given alemtuzumab induction and low-dose tacrolimus maintenance immunosuppression (target trough 7 to 10 ng/mL for the first 6 months and 5 to 7 ng/mL thereafter). Serum creatinine values, acute rejection episodes, and graft survival were noted at week 1 as well as months 3, 6, 12, and 18. RESULTS: At the time of analysis, 47 patients were at 6 months, 28 at 12 months, and 6 patients at 18 months from transplant. Mean follow-up was 12.53 months (range, 6 to 23). Mean serum creatinine was 1.47 +/- 0.65 mg/dL at 3 months, 1.56 +/- 0.84 at 6 months, 1.45 +/- 0.37 at 12 months, and 1.74 +/- 0.35 at 18 months. The 1-year clinical acute rejection rate was 21% (6/28), occurring at 0 to 3 months in 2 (33%), 4 to 6 months in 1 (17%), and >6 months in 3 patients (50%). Biopsy-proven acute rejection was 14% (4/28). The episodes were classified as borderline in one, Banff 2A in two, and Banff 3 in one patients. One patient had both acute cellular and acute humoral rejection; half responded to steroid pulse therapy. The 1-year patient survival rate was 90%. The 1-year death-censored graft survival rate was 98%. CONCLUSION: Alemtuzumab induction with tacrolimus monotherapy is an acceptable option in standard risk patients. BPAR was 14%, but renal function remained satisfactory at 18 months posttransplant.     

WOFIE synergizes with calcineurin-inhibitor treatment and early steroid withdrawal in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: According to the window of opportunity for immunologic engagement (WOFIE) concept, as designed by R. Calne, the authors prospectively analyzed the effect of a 72-hr immunosuppressive window on graft function in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Immunosuppressive therapy comprised tacrolimus (trough levels, 5-8 ng/mL after day 8 posttransplantation), daclizumab (1 mg/kg body weight at day 0 and 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks posttransplantation), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (1-2 g/day), and prednisolone. All patients received an induction therapy including daclizumab, prednisolone, and MMF. WOFIE patients were stopped from immunosuppression for 72 hr posttransplant. Steroids were withdrawn in both groups 12 to 16 weeks after transplantation and dual therapy with MMF and low-dose tacrolimus ensued. RESULTS: Thirty renal transplant recipients (16 in the WOFIE group and 14 in the control group) have been enrolled since May 2000. Patient and graft survival were 93.8% and 87.5%, respectively, in the WOFIE group and 100.0% and 92.9% in the control group, respectively. One patient in the WOFIE group died of cytomegalovirus infection with stable graft function. There were no grafts lost because of acute rejection or primary nonfunction in either group. Patients treated according to the WOFIE protocol revealed less acute rejection episodes during the time of observation (first biopsy-confirmed acute rejection rate 12.5% in the WOFIE group vs. 42.9% in the control cohort). Whereas 92.1% of the WOFIE patients were successfully discontinued from steroids, permanent steroid withdrawal was achieved in only 60% of the control cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Initial interruption of immunosuppression was associated with a decrease of acute graft rejections. Subsequently, the authors postulate a synergistic effect on the immunosuppressive efficiency of calcineurin inhibitors when combined with an initial drug-free window.     

Immunosuppression with generic tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients: preliminary report in Chile

The association of tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in renal transplant patients has diminished the incidence of acute rejection. We evaluated the use of generic TAC and MMF as primary immunosuppression in 6 living related (LR) and 11 cadaveric (C) donor renal transplant recipients (9 men, 8 women) of mean age 37 +/- 12 years (range, 17-56 years) between May 2006 and June 2007. From day 0 all patients received TAC, MMF, and prednisone without antibody induction. They were followed for the development of acute rejection, graft loss, side effects, and mortality. Mean follow-up was 7.6 months (range, 2-15 months). No biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes, graft loss, or recipient deaths were observed. Creatinine levels at the end of the study were 1.90 +/- 1.0 mg/dL (range, 0.62-4.25 mg/dL for C recipients and 1.19 +/- 0.15 mg/dL (range, 0.91-1.35 mg/dL) for LR recipients. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 130/73 mm Hg with 12 patients (70.5%) on antihypertensive therapy with calcium antagonists and beta-blockers. Mean (range) of total cholesterol, triglycerides, and glucose were 172 (110-244) mg/dL, 139 (69-277) mg/dL, and 89 (63-129) mg/dL, respectively. MMF was suspended in 1 patient due to diarrhea and 1 other because of leukopenia. We observed that generic TAC and MMF yielded effective and safe immunosuppression in terms of mortality, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and graft loss with a low incidence of adverse effects during the study period.     

Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium is Therapeutically Equivalent to Mycophenolate Mofetil in de novo Renal Transplant Patients

The introduction of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) represented a major advance in transplant medicine, although optimal use may be limited by gastrointestinal (GI) side-effects. An enteric-coated formulation of mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS; myfortic) has been developed with the aim of improving the upper GI tolerability of mycophenolic acid. Therapeutic equivalence of EC-MPS (720 mg b.i.d.) and MMF (1000 mg MMF b.i.d.), with concomitant cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) and corticosteroids, was assessed in 423 de novo kidney transplant patients recruited to a 12-month, double-blind study. Efficacy failure (biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], graft loss, death or loss to follow up) at 6 months (EC-MPS 25.8% vs. MMF 26.2%; 95% CI: [-8.7, +8.0]) demonstrated therapeutic equivalence. At 12 months, the incidence of BPAR, graft loss or death was 26.3% and 28.1%, and of BPAR alone was 22.5% and 24.3% for EC-MPS and MMF, respectively. Among those with BPAR, the incidence of severe acute rejection was 2.1% with EC-MPS and 9.8% with MMF (p=ns). The safety profile and incidence of GI adverse events were similar for both groups. Within 12 months, 15.0% of EC-MPS patients and 19.5% of MMF patients required dose changes for GI adverse events (p=ns). Enteric-coated-MPS 720 mg b.i.d. is therapeutically equivalent to MMF 1000 mg b.i.d. with a comparable safety profile.     

Pharmacokinetics of daclizumab and mycophenolate mofetil with cyclosporine and steroids in renal transplantation

Daclizumab and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) decrease the incidence of acute allograft rejection. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was performed primarily to assess the pharmacokinetics of MMF in an immunosuppressive regimen incorporating daclizumab. At five centers, 75 renal transplant recipients were randomized 2:1 to receive either daclizumab 1 mg/kg or placebo pre-transplantation and every other week, for a total of five doses. All patients received cyclosporine, steroids, and MMF. Levels of mycophenolic acid (MPA), its glucuronide metabolite, and daclizumab were measured after dosing on days 28 and 56. Safety parameters evaluated included: adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, infections, patient/graft survival, incidence of lymphoproliferative disorders, and incidence of acute rejection at 12 months. The concomitant administration of daclizumab and MMF had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of MPA: AUC(0-8) values (microg h/mL +/- SD) on day 28 were 30.1 +/- 13.3 for daclizumab-treat patients vs. 31.1 +/- 12.4 for placebo and on day 56, 37.7 +/- 18.2 for daclizumab-treated patients vs. 35.7 +/- 14.0 for placebo. Adverse events were similar between the two groups. Acute rejection at 12 months occurred in 14% of patients receiving daclizumab and 20% of patients receiving placebo. The coadministration of daclizumab did not result in a pharmacokinetic interaction with MPA, the active metabolite of MMF.     

The use of an anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody and mycophenolate mofetil enables the use of a low-dose tacrolimus and early withdrawal of steroids in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Reducing calcineurin-inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity and simultaneously avoiding long-term steroid related side-effects is a desirable goal in renal transplantation. We examined the hypothesis that using anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody induction and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) would allow the lowering of target pre-dose blood concentrations of tacrolimus immediately after transplantation and subsequently stopping steroids at 5 months. METHODS: Eighty-two kidney recipients were enrolled in a single-center study comparing two tacrolimus-based protocols. Group I (n = 41) patients received a standard-dose tacrolimus (blood concentration 10-15 ng/mL) with MMF and a standard dose corticosteroid. Group II (n = 41) patients were treated with a low-dose tacrolimus (blood concentration 5-10 ng/mL) and MMF, a low-dose corticosteroid (stopped after 5 months) and induction with daclizumab. RESULTS: Patient (95.1 versus 100%) and graft survival (92.6 versus 97.5%) at 1 yr were not different between groups. Patients of group II experienced significantly less acute rejections than group I (17.1 versus 41.4% p = 0.03). Delayed graft function occurred less often in group II (5 versus 12% p = 0.43). Graft function at 1 yr was significantly better in group II (serum creatinine 1.49 versus 1.69 mg/dL and creatinine clearance 59.6 versus 49 mL/min; p < 0.05). Corticosteroids could be stopped after 5 months in 82.9% of group II patients. CONCLUSION: A regimen consisting of anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody induction and MMF allows the safe and efficient use of low-target pre-dose trough concentrations of tacrolimus and enables the early discontinuation of steroids. Preliminary results indicate a better 1-yr graft function compared to a normal-dose tacrolimus regimen.     

Steroid withdrawal in living donor renal transplant recipients using tacrolimus and cyclosporine: a randomized prospective study.

Steroids have been a mainstay of immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation despite their adverse effects. The introduction of new immunosuppressant has improved the survival rates and prompted trials of steroid withdrawal. We conducted a randomized prospective study to compare steroid withdrawal at 6 months post-transplant between tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (FK group) versus cyclosporine A + MMF (CsA group). Steroid was withdrawn at 6 months post-transplant under the condition of no rejection episode proven by biopsy and maintenance of serum creatinine level <2.0 mg/dl. Fourteen recipients were excluded because of acute rejection within 6 months or protocol violation. Steroid could be tapered off in 62 in FK group and 55 in CsA. Three cases in FK group and five in CsA had acute rejection within another 6 months after steroid withdrawal (P > 0.05). At 12 months, the incidence of post-transplant diabetes was 18.6% vs. 8.0% in FK and CsA group. And hypercholesterolemia was presented in 8.5% vs. 2.0%, hypertension in 47.5% vs. 56.0%, and serum creatinine level 1.18 +/- 0.24 mg/dl vs. 1.18 +/- 0.20 mg/dl, respectively (P > 0.05). Steroid withdrawal may be carried out successfully using both FK and CsA with MMF, but long-term follow-up is necessary.     

Randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in primary renal transplant recipients given tacrolimus and daclizumab/thymoglobulin: one year follow-up

BACKGROUND: It was of interest to compare enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) versus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) among renal transplant recipients receiving a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen. METHODS: Between December 2004 and February 2006, a single-center, open-label randomized trial of MMF (group A, n=75) versus EC-MPS (group B, n=75) was performed in primary renal transplant recipients receiving combined thymoglobulin/daclizumab induction along with reduced tacrolimus dosing and elimination of corticosteroids 1 week postoperatively. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of acute rejection (AR) during the first 12 months posttransplant; secondary aims were to compare graft and patient survival, renal function, drug dosing and monitoring, gastrointestinal side effects, and other adverse events at 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Patient/graft survival in groups A and B were 100%/96% versus 99%/96%, respectively (N.S.). At 12 months, a total of nine patients (6%) experienced biopsy-proven AR, 3% (2/75) vs. 9% (7/75) in the MMF and EC-MPS arms, respectively (N.S.). At 12 months, the geometric mean*/SE serum creatinine concentration and arithmetic mean+/-SE calculated glomerular filtration rate in groups A and B, respectively, were 1.30*/1.03 and 61.4+/-2.0 vs. 1.26*/1.03 and 66.0+/-2.1 (N.S.). Incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus (11% vs. 11%), infections requiring hospitalization (13% vs. 15%), and gastrointestinal side effects (36% vs. 32%) appeared equivalent (N.S.). CONCLUSIONS: Early efficacy and toxicity were equivalent between the two study arms. Optimizing either MMF or EC-MPS along with a combined thymoglobulin/daclizumab induction, low tacrolimus dosing and steroid avoidance resulted in a low AR rate and an acceptably high renal function at 12 months.     

Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in maintenance renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus: clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic outcomes

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) pharmacokinetics using the mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) formulation are known to differ between patients receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine, but only limited data exist concerning concomitant use of tacrolimus and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS). METHODS: In this six-month, multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial, 63 maintenance renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus were converted from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to EC-MPS. RESULTS: MPA concentration-time profiles in 21 patients showed that MPA exposure was similar with MMF or EC-MPS (mean area under the curve 39.9+/-11.6 microg x h/mL versus 43.7+/-17.4 microg x h/mL at day 14 post-conversion). Median time to peak concentration was 0.5 hr with MMF and 1.5 hr with EC-MPS. Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity was almost identical: area under the enzyme activity time curve (AEC) was 124.2+/-32.0 nmol x h/mg prot/h with MMF and 130.3+/-36.6 nmol x h/mg prot/h with EC-MPS at 14 days post-conversion; average daytime IMPDH activity was 10.3+/-2.7 nmol/h/mg protein and 10.9+/-2.7 nmol/h/mg protein, respectively. Maximal daytime inhibition of IMPDH activity was 67% with MMF and 62% with EC-MPS at day 14. One patient (1.6%) experienced mild biopsy-proven acute rejection. No graft losses or deaths occurred. Renal function remained stable (mean calculated creatinine clearance 70.6+/-26.8 mL/min with MMF and 68.8+/-25.4 mL/min six months post-conversion). Adverse events or infections with a suspected relation to EC-MPS occurred in 12 patients (19%). Four patients discontinued EC-MPS due to adverse events or infections. CONCLUSIONS: MMF and EC-MPS are associated with similar MPA exposure and equivalent pharmacodynamic effect. Conversion of tacrolimus-treated maintenance renal transplant patients from MMF to EC-MPS is safe and well-tolerated and does not compromise therapeutic efficacy.     

A prospective, multicenter study of once-daily extended-release tacrolimus in de novo liver transplant recipients

To minimize noncompliance in organ transplantation, a new formulation was developed of once-daily extended-release (EXTD) tacrolimus. To analyze the efficacy and safety of this new drug formulation in de novo liver transplant recipients, a prospective, multicenter study was performed in six centers in Spain. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes (BPAR) according to the BANFF criteria during the first 3 months of immunosuppression with the EXTD formulation of tacrolimus. Fifty-two patients received a mean initial dose of 10.0 ± 3.8 mg that was gradually reduced to 7.1 ± 4.0 mg, achieving stable mean blood levels of 8.6 ± 3.7 ng/mL at 3 months. BPAR was reported in seven (13%) patients, but patient and graft survivals were 100%. After transplantation liver function improved and was stably maintained throughout the study. At 3 months, mean bilirubin levels were 2.1 ± 5.5 mg/dL and mean alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase were 61.6 ± 75.2 U/L and 55.2 ± 76.9 U/L, respectively. Mean serum creatinine of 0.8 ± 0.3 mg/dL pretransplant increased to 1.1 ± 0.4 mg/dL after 3 months (P < .0001). There was no significant increase in the rate of hypertension from pretransplant levels: 30% at baseline versus 31% at 3 months. Mean glucose levels did not change significantly throughout the study. There were no cases of hepatitis C virus relapse. EXTD tacrolimus demonstrated excellent stability in blood trough levels with a good efficacy and safety profile in de novo liver transplant recipients that was similar to the well-described properties of standard-release twice-daily formulation of tacrolimus.     

Renal function and safety in stable kidney transplant recipients converted from immediate-release to prolonged-release tacrolimus

This multicenter, open, phase IIIb study assessed short-term efficacy, safety and dose adjustments in adult stable renal transplant recipients converted from tacrolimus twice-daily (BID) to once-daily (QD). Patients receiving unchanged tacrolimus BID for ≥ 12 weeks were enrolled, and after 6-weeks, converted from tacrolimus BID to QD (morning dose) on a 1 : 1 (mg : mg) total daily dose basis, for a further 12 weeks. Primary endpoint: change in steady-state creatinine clearance between treatment phases. Secondary endpoints: biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), patient and graft survival, safety. 128 patients enrolled (mean age 48.9 years; time post-transplant 48.9 months); 91 evaluated for the primary endpoint. Mean total daily dose was 0.06 mg/kg (BID) and 0.07 mg/kg (QD); 79.1% required one/no dose changes post-conversion to maintain recommended blood-trough levels; average dose increase was small (0.6-0.7 mg/day) with more dose increases in patients on the lowest tacrolimus BID doses. Renal function remained stable and non-inferiority of tacrolimus QD against tacrolimus BID was demonstrated. There were no BPAR episodes; patient and graft survival were 100%. Adverse events were few; none led to dose modifications/discontinuation. Tacrolimus BID to tacrolimus QD conversion is straightforward and does not compromise renal function in stable kidney transplant patients in the short term.     

Randomized trial of immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation

The optimal long-term regimen for immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients is unknown. We conducted a randomized trial involving 150 kidney transplant recipients to compare tacrolimus/sirolimus, tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and cyclosporine/sirolimus. All patients received daclizumab induction and maintenance corticosteroids. Median follow-up was 8 yr post-transplant. Acute rejection (AR) occurred significantly less often among those treated with tacrolimus/MMF (12%) than among those treated with tacrolimus/sirolimus (30%) or cyclosporine/sirolimus (28%). Mean estimated GFR was consistently higher in the tacrolimus/MMF arm, especially after controlling for donor age in a multivariable model during the first 36 mo (P ≤ 0.008). The rate of dying with a functioning graft was significantly higher among those treated with tacrolimus/sirolimus (26%) than among those treated with tacrolimus/MMF (12%) or cyclosporine/sirolimus (4%). We did not observe significant differences in actuarial graft survival at 8 yr post-transplant between the groups. Patient noncompliance seemed responsible for 45% (13/29) of observed graft failures, with 11 of these occurring after 36 mo. Significantly more viral infections, protocol violations, and need for antilipid therapy occurred among patients receiving sirolimus, but we did not observe differences between the groups with regard to infections requiring hospitalization or new-onset diabetes. Taken together, these results suggest that maintenance therapy with tacrolimus/MMF is more favorable than either tacrolimus/sirolimus or cyclosporine/sirolimus.     

Renal function in patients with cadaveric kidney transplants treated with tacrolimus or cyclosporine

INTRODUCTION: Renal function predicts graft survival in kidney transplant patients. This study compared the 2-year evolution of renal function in patients treated with cyclosporine or tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisone. METHODS: We studied 1558 cadaveric renal transplant recipients from 14 Spanish hospitals between January 2000 and December 2002. Of these, 1168 were treated with tacrolimus and 390 with cyclosporine. The primary efficacy endpoint was long-term renal function. Renal function was measured by serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by creatinine clearance calculated from the Cockcroft-Gault formula. This report summarizes the 2-year results. RESULTS: At 24 months the tacrolimus group showed significantly better serum creatinine (1.5 +/- 0.7 vs 1.8 +/- 0.8 mg/dL, P < .001) and GFR (60.5 +/- 20.9 mL/min vs 47.9 +/- 10.0, P < .001) than the cyclosporine group. Additionally, recipients with ideal graft donors (23.5 +/- 2.8 vs 24.0 +/- 2.9 years) had a better serum creatinine at 2 years (1.23 +/- 0.2 vs 1.5 +/- 0.4 mg/dL, P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed that tacrolimus was an independent factor associated with better renal function: odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval (1.2 to 2.2), P < .001. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a renal transplant treated with tacrolimus in combination with MMF and prednisone displayed better renal function at 2 years than those who received cyclosporine.     

Daclizumab induction and maintenance steroid-free immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus to prevent acute rejection of hepatic allografts

Steroid-free immunosuppressive regimens reduce corticosteroid-related side effects in liver transplant recipients although their efficacy is very variable. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a steroid-free regimen in a 6-month, open-label, multicenter, pilot study, which involved 102 liver transplant patients treated with daclizumab (2 mg/kg within 6 h following transplant and 1 mg/kg on day 7), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 1 g b.i.d) and tacrolimus (trough levels of 5-15 ng/ml in the first month and 5-10 ng/ml thereafter). One intra-operative dose of methylprednisolone was administered. At 6 months, the acute rejection rate was 9.8%, and patient and graft survival rates were 96% and 95%, respectively. Acute rejection rates were similar for hepatitis C-positive patients (8.6%) and hepatitis C-negative patients (10.4%). Infections occurred in 22% of patients; most cases were considered mild or moderate. Post-transplantation hypertension and diabetes mellitus developed in 37% and 14% of patients, respectively, during the study period, but were markedly less frequent (8% and 6%, respectively) at 6 months. Hypercholesterolemia was observed in only 2% of patients. In conclusion, the steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen of daclizumab, MMF, and tacrolimus effectively prevents acute rejection after liver transplantation without decreasing safety.     

Limited Dose Monoclonal IL-2R Antibody Induction Protocol after Primary Kidney Transplantation

This study prospectively compared immunoprophylaxis with a single intraoperative dose (2 mg/kg) of monoclonal interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) antibody vs. noninduction in kidney transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus (FK 506), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and a prednisone-based immunosuppression regimen. One hundred recipients of first-kidney transplant were enrolled into the study to receive either anti-IL-2R monoclonal antibody, daclizumab (2 mg/kg intraoperatively, limited anti-IL-2R) or no induction (control). Each patient also received oral tacrolimus (dosed to target trough level 10-15 ng/mL), MMF (500 mg bid) and prednisone. The primary efficacy end-point was the incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection during the first 6 months post-transplant. The patients were also followed for 12-month graft function, and graft and patient survival rates. Other than the donor's age being significantly lower in the control group, both groups were comparable with respect to age, weight, gender, race, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR mismatch, panel reactive antibody (%PRA), cold ischemic time, cytomegalovirus (CMV) status, causes of renal failure, and duration and modes of renal replacement therapy (RRT). During the first 6 months, episodes of first biopsy confirmed acute rejection was 3/50 (6%) in the limited anti-IL-2R group and 8/50 (16%) in the controls (p < 0.05). Twelve-month patient 100/98 (%) and graft survival 100/96 (%) were not statistically different. The group receiving limited anti-IL-2R did not have any adverse reactions. Our study demonstrates that a limited (single) 2 mg/kg immunoprophylaxis dose with monoclonal IL-2R antibody (daclizumab) when combined with tacrolimus/MMF/steroid allows significant reduction in early renal allograft rejection to the single digit level. The therapy with anti-IL-2R antibody is simple and is well tolerated.     

A prospective, randomized, multicenter study evaluating early corticosteroid withdrawal with Thymoglobulin® in living-donor kidney transplantation

Woodle ES, Peddi VR, Tomlanovich S, Mulgaonkar S, Kuo PC, for the TRIMS Study Investigators. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study evaluating early corticosteroid withdrawal with Thymoglobulin^® in living‐donor kidney transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 73–83. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: This study compared the safety and efficacy of early corticosteroid withdrawal (ECSWD) with rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction to chronic corticosteroid therapy (CCST) without antibody induction in primary, living‐donor renal transplant recipients. Methods: Eligible subjects were randomized 2:1 to receive either an ECSWD (n = 103) or CCST (n = 48) regimen, with all subjects receiving tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Results: Results are reported as ECSWD vs. CCST. No significant differences were observed in the primary composite endpoint of freedom from biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, and death at six months (85.4% vs. 85.4%) or 12 months (84.4% vs. 74.4%). At 12 months, no difference was observed in BPAR (13.9% vs. 19.4%); however, ECSWD was associated with lower total cholesterol (159.7 ± 39.2 vs. 196.5 ± 56.7 mg/dL, p = 0.012), and trends toward significance were noted in serum triglycerides (151.9 ± 92.0 vs. 181.4 ± 78.8 mg/dL, p = 0.073) and weight gain (+3.6 ± 9.4 vs. +6.4 ± 9.3 kg, p = 0.069). No differences were observed in serious adverse events or infectious complications, with the exception of a higher incidence of leukopenia with ECSWD. Conclusions: rATG with tacrolimus and MMF therapy may allow early elimination of corticosteroids, is associated with trends toward lower lipid levels, less weight gain, and a safety profile comparable to CCST therapy.