Primary flap closure combined with Emdogain alone or Emdogain and Cerasorb in the treatment of intra-bony defects

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical outcomes of three different modalities of treatment for deep intra-bony defects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients were paralleled for clinical parameters and randomly assigned to treatment. They displayed one angular defect each with an intra-bony component > or =3 mm, probing pocket depth (PPD) and probing attachment level (PAL) > or =7 mm, and plaque index (PI) <1. Nineteen defects were treated, respectively, with enamel matrix derivative (EMD)+tricalcium phosphate (TCP) or EMD alone and 18 defects with modified Widman flap (MWF). Primary flap closure was used in all three groups. PI, gingival index, bleeding on probing, PPD, PAL, and recession (REC) were measured before and 12 months after treatment. RESULTS: Treatment with EMD alone yielded a 3.9+/-1.3 mm PPD decrease and a 3.7+/-1.0 mm PAL gain (p<0.001), whereas EMD+beta-TCP produced a 4.1+/-1.2 mm PPD reduction and a 4.0+/-1.0 mm PAL gain (p<0.001). These outcome parameters did not differ between the two groups. REC increased by 0.7+/-1.3 mm. After MWF treatment, attachment gain was 2.1+/-1.4 mm (p<0.001) and PPD reduction was 3.8+/-1.8 mm, whereas REC increased by 1.5+/-0.7 mm (p=0.042 versus EMD). CONCLUSION: Both EMD treatments showed similar clinical effects, with significant PAL gain and a significantly lower REC increase in comparison with MWF treatment.     

Autogenous bone graft in conjunction with enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of deep periodontal intra-osseous defects: a report of 13 consecutively treated patients

AIM: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of a regenerative procedure based on supra-crestal soft tissue preservation in association with combined autogenous bone (AB) graft/enamel matrix derivative (EMD) application in the treatment of deep periodontal intra-osseous defects. METHODS: Thirteen consecutively treated patients, seven females and six males, aged 30-65 years, three smokers, were included. A total of 15 deep, one- to two-wall intra-osseous defects were selected. Immediately before surgery and 6 months after surgery, pocket probing depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and gingival recession (REC) were recorded. RESULTS: PPD amounted to 9.4+/-1.8 mm before surgery, and decreased to 4.7+/-1.2 mm post-surgery (p<0.0000). CAL varied from 10.5+/-2.0 mm pre-surgery to 6.2+/-1.7 mm post-surgery (p<0.0000), with CAL gain averaging 4.3+/-1.4 mm. Fourteen (93.3%) defects presented CAL gain >/=3 mm. REC change was 0.4+/-0.7 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the present study indicated that a regenerative procedure based on supra-crestal soft tissue preservation and combined AB/EMD treatment leads to a clinically and statistically significant improvement of soft tissue conditions of deep periodontal intra-osseous defects.     

The combined use of enamel matrix proteins and a tetracycline-coated expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier membrane in the treatment of intra-osseous defects

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this split-mouth study was to evaluate the clinical response of enamel matrix proteins (EMPs, Emdogain Gel in intra-osseous defects with or without a combined application of a tetracycline-coated expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier membrane (e-PTFE, Gore-Tex). METHODS: Twelve pairs of intra-osseous periodontal defects in 11 patients received the application of EMPs on the exposed root surface (EMP). One of the two defects received randomly, as an adjunct to EMP treatment, a tetracycline-coated e-PTFE membrane (MEMP). At baseline, 6- and 12-month probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and probing bone level (PBL) were measured. RESULTS: After 12 months, the EMP defects showed a significant mean PPD reduction of 2.86+/-0.75 mm, a mean gain in CAL of 1.28+/-2.04 mm, a mean PBL gain of 1.63+/-1.21 mm and a mean increase of recession (REC) of 1.56+/-2.30 mm. The MEMP defects showed a significant mean PPD reduction of 3.02+/-1.55 mm, a mean gain in CAL of 1.65+/-1.29 mm, a mean PBL gain of 1.58+/-1.92 mm and a mean increase of REC of 1.38+/-1.63 mm. Except for significantly more post-operative discomfort at the MEMP sites, no significant differences were found between EMP and MEMP defects. CONCLUSION: Within the limits of this study, it is concluded that in the treatment of intra-osseous defects with EMP, the adjunctive use of a tetracycline-coated e-PTFE membrane failed to show more gain of CAL and PBL.     

Long-term stability of periodontal conditions achieved following guided tissue regeneration with bioresorbable membranes: case series results after 6-7 years

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the results of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) treatment of intrabony defects with bioresorbable membranes after 6-7 years, and to disclose factors that may influence the long-term outcome of the treatment. METHODS: Twenty-five defects in 19 patients were treated by means of polylactic acid/citric acid ester copolymer bioresorbable membranes. At baseline and after 1 and 6-7 years, the following parameters were recorded: (1) probing pocket depth (PPD), (2) gingival recession (REC), (3) probing attachment level (PAL)=PPD+REC, (4) presence/absence of plaque (PI), (5) presence/absence of bleeding on probing (BOP). Smoking habits and frequency of dental-control visits were also recorded. Significance of differences between categorical variables was evaluated with McNemar's test, and between numerical variables with the t-test for paired observations. Generalized linear models were constructed to evaluate the influence of various factors on PAL gain and PPD changes from 1 to 6-7 years. Association of smoking, frequency of dental controls, oral hygiene, and BOP with sites losing > or =2 mm in PAL was evaluated with Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: At baseline, a mean PPD of 8.7+/-1.1 mm and a mean PAL of 9.8+/-1.5 mm was recorded. Statistically significant clinical improvements were observed at 1 and 6-7 years after GTR treatment. An average residual PPD of 3.8+/-1.1 mm and a mean PAL gain of 3.8+/-1.4 mm were observed after 1 year. After 6-7 years the corresponding values were 4.7+/-1.3 and 3.6+/-1.4 mm, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the 1- and the 6-7-year values. At the 6-7-year control, only 16% of the sites had lost > or =2 mm (maximum 3 mm), of the PAL gain obtained 1 year after GTR treatment. None of the sites had lost all of the attachment gained 1 year after treatment. Smoking, frequency of dental controls, oral hygiene, and BOP did not seem to influence the change of PPD and PAL gain, or the stability of PAL gain (i.e. losing PAL or not) from 1 to 6-7 years from treatment. CONCLUSION: Clinical improvements achieved by GTR treatment of intrabony defects by means of bioresorbable membranes can be maintained on a long-term basis.     

Smoking affects the outcome of guided tissue regeneration with bioresorbable membranes: a retrospective analysis of intrabony defects

OBJECTIVES: To disclose factors that may influence the results of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) treatment in intrabony defects with bioresorbable membranes. METHODS: Forty-seven intrabony defects in 32 patients were treated by means of polylactic acid/citric acid ester copolymer bioresorbable membranes. At baseline and after 1 year, the following parameters were recorded: (1) probing pocket depth (PPD), (2) gingival recession (REC), (3) probing attachment level (PAL)=PPD+REC, (4) presence/absence of plaque (PI), (5) presence/absence of bleeding on probing (BOP) and (6) intrabony component (IC) configuration (i.e. primarily presence of one, two, or three bone walls). Occurrence of membrane exposure and smoking habits were also recorded. Significance of differences between categorical variables was evaluated with McNemar's test, and between numerical variables with the t-test for paired observations. Generalized linear models were constructed to evaluate the influence of various factors on PAL gain and PPD after 1 year, including in the analysis only one defect per patient (i.e. 32 defects) chosen at random. Odds ratios were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Differences between smokers and non-smokers were evaluated by means of Pearson's chi2 and Student's t-test for non-paired observations. RESULTS: At baseline, a mean PPD of 8.6+/-1.1 mm and a mean PAL of 9.8+/-1.6 mm was recorded. Statistically significant clinical improvements were observed 1 year after GTR treatment. An average residual PPD of 3.7+/-1.1 mm and a mean PAL gain of 3.8+/-1.5 mm were recorded. IC configuration and exposure of the membrane did not seem to influence the results, while a negative effect of smoking on the clinical parameters was observed. Smokers gained approximately 1 mm less in PAL than non-smokers (3.2+/-1.4 versus 4.3+/-1.3, respectively; p=0.03) and had approximately seven times less chances to gain 4 mm in PAL as compared with patients who did not smoke (odds ratio: 0.15). PPD reduction was less pronounced in smokers than in non-smokers (4.5+/-0.7 versus 5.5+/-0.7, respectively; p<0.01), resulting in somewhat deeper residual PPD in smokers than in non-smokers (3.6+/-1.0 versus 3.4+/-1.1; p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Smoking impairs the healing outcome of GTR treatment of intrabony defects with bioresorbable membranes.     

Comparison of clinical outcomes following treatment of chronic adult periodontitis with subgingival scaling or subgingival scaling plus metronidazole gel

BACKGROUND, AIMS: Conventional treatment of chronic periodontitis involves mechanical debridement of periodontal pockets. Recently, subgingival antimicrobials have been used adjunctively following such debridement. This 2-centre study compared the clinical effects of subgingival scaling (SRP) with SRP plus subgingival application of 25% metronidazole gel, Elyzol (SRP+gel), in patients with chronic adult periodontitis. METHOD: Voluntary informed written consent was obtained from 45 subjects at the Eastman (mean age 46, range 34-63) and 43 subjects at RAF Halton (mean age 47, range 34-71) who participated in this blind, randomised split-mouth design study. All had at least 2 sites in each quadrant with probing pocket depth (PPD) > or = 5 mm. PPD, bleeding on probing (BOP), and clinical probing attachment levels (CAL) measured using a stent, were recorded at baseline and at 1, 3, 6 and 9 months post-therapy. After subgingival scaling of all quadrants, 2 quadrants were randomly selected to be treated with metronidazole gel. RESULTS: A paired t-test on baseline values showed no bias between groups. Both treatments effectively reduced the signs of periodontitis. At each follow-up visit, reduction in PPD, CAL and BOP after the combined treatment was greater than for SRP alone. Paired t-tests showed that the improvement in the SRP+gel group was statistically significantly better (p<0.001) than for SRP alone (mean 0.5 +/- 0.6 mm. 95% CI 0.4-0.6 mm.) Similarly, the % of sites which improved to a final pocket depth of < or = 3 mm and the % of sites which improved over the 9 months of the study by as much as > or = 2 mm were greater for SRP+gel than for SRP alone. CONCLUSIONS: At the end of the study, the mean reductions for PPD were 1.0 mm (SRP) compared to 1.5 mm (SRP+gel), and for CAL they were 0.4 mm (SRP) compared to 0.8 mm (SRP+gel), with mean difference for CAL between treatments of 0.4 +/- 0.6 mm (95% confidence intervals of 0.3-0.6 mm). The combination therapy of SRP+gel was superior to the conventional treatment of SRP alone, and these differences were maintained for 9 months.     

Enamel matrix proteins in the regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects

AIM: This prospective multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of papilla preservation flap surgery with or without the application of enamel matrix proteins (EMD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 172 patients with advanced chronic periodontitis were recruited in 12 centers in 7 countries. All patients had at least one intrabony defect of > or =3mm. Heavy smokers (> or =20 cigarettes/day) were excluded. The surgical procedures included access for root instrumentation using either the simplified or the modified papilla preservation flap in order to obtain optimal tissue adaptation and primary closure. After debridement, roots were conditioned for 2 min with a gel containing 24% EDTA. EMD was applied in the test subjects, and omitted in the controls. Postsurgically, a strict plaque control protocol was followed. At baseline and 1 year following the interventions, clinical attachment levels (CAL), pocket probing depths (PPD), recession (REC), full-mouth plaque scores and full-mouth bleeding scores were assessed. A total of 166 patients were available for the 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: At baseline, 86 test and 86 control patients presented with similar subject and defect characteristics. On average, the test defects gained 3.1+/-1.5 mm of CAL, while the control defects yielded a significantly lower CAL gain of 2.5+/-1.5 mm. Pocket reduction was also significantly higher in the test group (3.9+/-1.7 mm) when compared to the controls (3.3+/-1.7 mm). A multivariate analysis indicated that the treatment, the clinical centers, cigarette smoking, baseline PPD, and defect corticalisation significantly influenced CAL gains. A frequency distribution analysis of the studied outcomes indicated that EMD increased the predictability of clinically significant results (CAL gains > or =4 mm) and decreased the probability of obtaining negligible or no gains in CAL (CAL gains <2 mm). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this trial indicated that regenerative periodontal surgery with EMD offers an additional benefit in terms of CAL gains, PPD reductions and predictability of outcomes with respect to papilla preservation flaps alone.     

Reduction of gingival recession following orthodontic intrusion in periodontally compromised patients

Authors – Re S, Cardaropoli D, Abundo R, Corrente G Objectives – To evaluate the role of orthodontic intrusion and alignment in the reduction of gingival recession (REC) around maxillary incisors of adult periodontal patients. Design – Prospective clinical study. Setting and Sample Population – Twenty‐eight consecutively treated adult patients, suffering from severe chronic periodontitis and with one upper central incisor extruded and infrabony defect on its mesial site. All patients were seen in a private practice in Turin, Italy. At baseline, all patients presented with REC on the buccal and mesial aspects of the treated teeth. Measurements and Results – For each patient probing pocket depth (PPD) and REC were assessed at baseline, at the end of treatment and 1‐year after the end of treatment. REC was also evaluated independently in patients with narrow (NPB) or wide periodontal biotype (WPB). All parameters showed improvement between initial and final measurements statistically, and showed no changes between final and follow‐up measurements. Mean mesial PPD decrease was 4.29 mm, with a residual PPD of 2.50 mm. Mean REC reduction was 0.96 mm on the buccal sites and 1.71 mm on the mesial. No statistical difference was recorded on REC values between groups NPB and WPB. Conclusion – The presented clinical protocol resulted in improvement of all parameters examined. At the end of orthodontic treatment a predictable reduction of REC was reported, both in patients with thin or wide gingiva.     

Comparative clinical responses related to the use of various periodontal instrumentation

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate in vivo the effectiveness of scaling and root planing of a power-driven mechanism compared with hand instruments and ultrasonic insert alone with a split-mouth design after 3 and 6 months. METHODS: Healing events after initial periodontal therapy were investigated in 20 patients with moderate-to-severe adult periodontitis. Plaque index (PlI), bleeding on probing (PBI), probing pocket depth (PPD), probing attachment level (PAL) and number of moderate and deep pockets (NMP, NDP) were recorded at baseline and 3 and 6 months after treatment. Oral hygiene instruction was provided for each patient. Randomly assigned quadrants per patient were scaled and root planed with hand instrumentation (curettes, hoes and files), with reciprocating power-driven instruments, with ultrasonic scaler alone and with the combined use of ultrasonic scaler and power-driven inserts. The Friedman test was applied to test the significance of difference between the various methods of root instrumentation. Repeated measures of analysis of variance (manova) were used to analyse the time effect on the different treatments. RESULTS: At the 6-month evaluation, all groups in the scaling and root planing treatment presented with an improvement in the measured clinical parameters, as compared with baseline. No statistical differences (p>0.05) were observed in the assessed periodontal indices among the study sites between the four groups for either treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Under our experimental conditions, this clinical study demonstrates that mechanized root planing with power-driven instruments, as effective as the usual procedures (hand and sonic instruments), represents a satisfactory and alternative means of nonsurgical root therapy.     

Coronally advanced flap for the treatment of buccal gingival recessions with and without enamel matrix derivative. A split-mouth study

BACKGROUND: The coronally advanced flap (CAF) is a predictable method for achieving root coverage in buccal gingival recessions. The use of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) has already been tested in treating intrabony defects. No clinical comparative study has been published evaluating the CAF in combination with EMD in treating buccal gingival recessions. METHODS: This split-mouth study was performed to assess the efficacy of EMD to improve the results of a root coverage procedure. Fourteen pairs of Miller Class I and II bilateral comparable defects were selected in 12 patients. In each patient, one site was randomly assigned to the test group and the contralateral site to the control group. The treatment consisted of a CAF procedure with (test) or without (control) EMD. Gingival recession (REC), clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), and extension of keratinized tissue (KT) were recorded at baseline and 6 months postsurgery. RESULTS: The average initial REC was 3.71 mm (SD +/- 1.68) for the test group, and 3.50 mm (SD +/- 1.56) for the control group. The 2 groups were statistically homogeneous. The mean root coverage was 3.36 mm (SD +/- 1.55), corresponding to a value of 91.2% for the test group, and 2.71 mm (SD +/- 1.20), equal to 80.9% for the control group. The differences between the 2 groups were not statistically significant. The mean CAL gain was 3.57 mm (SD +/- 1.55) for the test group and 2.79 mm (SD +/- 1.19) for the control group. No changes of PD and KT were found. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that EMD does not seem to significantly improve the clinical outcomes of gingival recession treated by means of CAF, even though the test group showed slightly better results in terms of root coverage and CAL. Further studies with a larger number of teeth and higher statistical power are needed to support this conclusion.     

A comparative study on the use of a HA/collagen/chondroitin sulphate biomaterial (Biostite) and a bovine-derived HA xenograft (Bio-Oss) in the treatment of deep intra-osseous defects

OBJECTIVES: This parallel-group, randomized, clinical trial was designed to evaluate the clinical outcome of deep intra-osseous defects following reconstructive surgery with the use of a synthetic hydroxyapatite/equine Type I collagen/chondroitin sulphate biomaterial (Biostite), as compared to a bovine-derived hydroxyapatite xenograft (Bio-Oss). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four systemically healthy subjects with moderate to advanced periodontitis, 11 females and 13 males, aged 30-64 years, seven smokers, were selected. Patients presented with one interproximal deep intra-osseous defect (intra-osseous component >or=4 mm) as clinically and radiographically evaluated. Immediately before surgery and 12 months after surgery, pocket probing depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and radiographic depth of the defect (DEPTH) were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirteen defects were treated with Biostite (test) and 11 defects with Bio-Oss (control). In the test group, PPD amounted to 7.8+/-1.3 mm before surgery, and decreased significantly to 3.6+/-1.6 mm 12 months following surgery, while in the control group PPD significantly decreased from 7.5+/-2.0 mm pre-surgery to 3.1+/-1.0 mm post-surgery. At 1 year, CAL gain and DEPTH gain were 2.9+/-1.9 and 2.5+/-1.4 mm, respectively, in the test group, and 4.0+/-2.4 mm and 3.1+/-1.8 mm, respectively, in the control group. No statistically significant differences for PPD reduction, CAL gain and DEPTH gain were detected between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that both Biostite and Bio-Oss grafting biomaterials have determined a clinically and statistically significant improvement in terms of CAL gain, PPD reduction and radiographic DEPTH gain when used for the treatment of deep intra-osseous defects.     

Evaluation of enamel matrix derivative as an adjunct to non-surgical periodontal therapy

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the adjunctive use of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) on periodontal healing following nonsurgical periodontal therapy (scaling and root planing - SRP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was performed as an intraindividual, longitudinal trial of 3 months duration with a double-blinded, split-mouth, controlled, and randomized design. Twenty-two patients with moderate to severe chronic periodontitis were enrolled in the study. In each patient, two sites with pocket depths >/=5 mm and with radiographic angular bone defects >3 mm were selected. Baseline examination included measurement of probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment levels (CAL). The presence or absence of plaque and bleeding on probing at selected sites was also recorded. Following initial examination, full-mouth SRP was performed. Study sites were then treated with 24% EDTA for 2 min, followed by thorough irrigation with sterile saline. The sites were then randomized. The experimental site received subgingival application of enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain, BIORA AB, Malmo, Sweden). The control site received no additional treatment. At 3 months, all sites were re-examined. The response to therapy in experimental and control sites was evaluated, using change in probing depth and CAL as the primary outcome variables. Statistical analysis (paired t-tests) was used to compare response to treatment in control versus experimental sites. RESULTS: Statistically significant changes in PPD and CAL were seen in both treatment groups from baseline to 3 months. The mean PPD reduction was 2.3+/-0.5 mm for control sites and 2.0+/-0.3 mm for experimental sites. The mean CAL gain was 1.8+/-0.4 mm for control sites, and 1.4+/-0.3 mm for experimental sites. Statistical analysis, however, revealed no significant difference in PPD reduction or CAL gain between experimental and control groups (p>0.4). In addition, no difference was found between treatment groups in bleeding or plaque indices at 3 months. CONCLUSION: The findings from the present study do not support the use of EMD during routine, nonsurgical debridement of periodontal pockets as measured 3 months post SRP.     

Treatment of intrabony defects with enamel matrix proteins and guided tissue regeneration. A prospective controlled clinical study

BACKGROUND: Utilisation of enamel matrix proteins (EMD) and application of the guided tissue regeneration principle (GTR) are treatment modalities which both have been shown to result in periodontal regeneration. However, it is yet unknown whether the combination of EMD and GTR may additionally favor the regeneration process. AIM: The aim of the present controlled study was to evaluate clinically the treatment effect of EMD, GTR, combination of EMD and GTR, and flap surgery (control) on intrabony defects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 56 patients each of whom displaying one intrabony defect of a depth of at least 6 mm were randomly treated with one of the treatment modalities. Prior to surgery and at one year after, the following parameters were evaluated by a blinded examiner: Plaque index (PlI), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD), gingival recession (GR) and clinical attachment level (CAL). No statistical significant differences between the four groups were observed at baseline for any of the investigated parameters. RESULTS: At 1 year after therapy, the sites treated with EMD demonstrated a mean PPD reduction of 4.1 +/- 1.7 mm and a mean CAL gain of 3.4 +/- 1.5 mm (p<0.001). The sites treated with GTR showed a mean PPD reduction of 4.2 +/- 1.9 mm and a mean CAL gain of 3.1 +/- 1.5 mm (p<0.001). The sites treated with the combined treatment showed a mean PPD reduction of 4.3 +/- 1.4 mm and a mean CAL gain of 3.4 +/- 1.1 mm (p<0.001). In the control group, the mean PPD reduction was 3.7 +/- 1.4 mm (p<0.001) and the mean CAL gain measured 1.7 +/- 1.5 mm (p<0.01). All 4 treatments led to statistically significant PPD reduction and CAL gain. All three regenerative treatments led to higher CAL gain than the control treatment (p<0.05). No statistical significant differences in PPD reduction and CAL gain were observed between the three regenerative treatments. CONCLUSION: It may be concluded that (a) all 3 regenerative treatment modalities may lead to higher CAL gain than the control one, and (b) the combined treatment does not seem to improve the outcome of the regenerative procedure.     

Supracrestal soft tissue preservation with enamel matrix proteins in treatment of deep intrabony defects

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of a regenerative procedure based on supracrestal soft tissue preservation in association with enamel matrix proteins (EMP) in the treatment of deep intrabony defects. METHODS: The subjects included 35 consecutively treated patients, 23 females and 12 males, aged 28-61 years, 11 of whom were smokers. Patients presented with at least one intrabony defect with probing pocket depth > or = 6 mm and a radiographic depth of the defect > or = 4 mm at the initial visit. Immediately before surgery and 9-12 months after surgery, Local Plaque Score (LPS), Local Bleeding Score (LBS), probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (REC), and radiographic depth of the defect (DEPTH) were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-one (88.6%) defects were LPS-negative presurgery, while 29 (82.9%) defects presented with no plaque postsurgery. The prevalence of LBS-positive defects shifted from 94.3% presurgery to 8.4% postsurgery (p < 0.0000). PPD was 8.9 mm before surgery, and decreased to 3.5 mm postsurgery (p < 0.0000). CAL varied from 10.1 mm presurgery to 5.4 mm postsurgery (p < 0.0000), with an average improvement (gain) of 4.7 +/- 1.7 mm. Twenty-six (74.3%) defects presented a gain of least 4 mm. Regression analysis showed a positive correlation between CAL gain as a dependent variable, and presurgery PPD and amount of supracrestal soft tissues as predictors. DEPTH improvement (gain) was 3.9 +/- 1.8 mm, which represented 65% of defect fill. Twenty (57.1%) defects presented a DEPTH gain of at least 4 mm. DEPTH gain was significantly correlated to presurgery PPD (p < 0.000). No significant differences were found between smokers and non-smokers in terms of CAL and DEPTH gain. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the present study indicated that the regenerative procedure based on supracrestal soft tissue preservation and EMP application leads to clinically and statistically significant improvement of hard and soft tissue conditions of deep intrabony defects.     

Treatment of periodontal intrabony defects with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in combination with platelet-rich plasma: a comparative clinical trial

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present randomized, double-masked, clinical trial was to compare platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with a demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) to DFDBA mixed with a saline solution in the treatment of human intrabony defects. METHODS: Sixty interproximal intrabony osseous defects in 60 healthy, non-smoking subjects diagnosed with chronic periodontitis were treated in this study. Thirty subjects each were randomly assigned to the test group (PRP + DFDBA) or the control group (DFDBA + saline). Clinical and radiographic measurements were made at baseline and at the 12-month evaluation. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, the 12-month results indicated that both treatment modalities resulted in significant changes in all clinical parameters (gingival index, bleeding on probing, probing depth, clinical attachment level, and gingival recession; P <0.001) and radiographic parameters (hard tissue fill and bone depth reduction; P <0.001). However, the test group exhibited statistically significantly greater changes compared to the control group in probing depth reduction (4.3 +/- 1.7 mm versus 2.6 +/- 2.2 mm; P <0.05) and clinical attachment gain (3.5 +/- 2.1 mm versus 2.3 +/- 2.4 mm; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a combination of PRP and DFDBA led to a significantly greater clinical improvement in intrabony periodontal defects compared to DFDBA with saline. No statistically significant differences were observed in the hard tissue response between the two treatment groups, which confirmed that PRP had no effect on hard tissue fill or gain in new hard tissue formation.     

Effect of enamel matrix proteins on the treatment of intrabony defects: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial study

The objective of this split-mouth, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was to compare the clinical effect of treatment of 2- or 3-wall intrabony defects with open flap debridement (OFD) combined or not with enamel matrix proteins (EMP). Thirteen volunteers were selected with one pair of or more intrabony defects and probing pocket depth (PPD) > or = 5 mm. All individuals received instructions regarding oral hygiene and were submitted to scaling and root planing. Each participant received the two treatment modalities: test sites were treated with OFD and EMP, and control sites received only OFD. After 6 months, a significant reduction was observed in PPD for the EMP group (from 6.42 +/- 1.08 mm to 2.67 +/- 1.15 mm) and for the OFD group (from 6.08 +/- 1.00 mm to 2.00 +/- 0.95 mm) (p < 0.0001), but with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.13). A significant gain in relative attachment level (RAL) was observed in both groups (EMP: from 13.42 +/- 1.88 mm to 10.75 +/- 2.26 mm, p < 0.001; OFD: from 12.42 +/- 1.98 mm to 10.58 +/- 2.23 mm, p = 0.013), but with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.85). Gingival recession (GR) was higher in the EMP group (from 1.08 +/- 1.50 mm to 2.33 +/- 1.43 mm; p = 0.0009) than in the OFD group (from 0.66 +/- 1.15 mm to 1.16 +/- 1.33 mm; p = 0.16), but this difference was not significant (p = 0.06). In conclusion, the results showed that OFD combined with EMP was not able to improve treatment of intrabony defects compared to OFD alone.     

Four-year results following treatment of intrabony periodontal defects with an enamel matrix protein derivative: a report of 46 cases

Treatment of intrabony periodontal defects with an enamel matrix derivative (EMD) has been shown to predictably enhance periodontal regeneration. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the 4-year results following treatment of intrabony defects with EMD. Thirty-three patients with a total of 46 intrabony defects were treated. Each patient exhibited at least one intrabony defect with a probing depth > or = 6 mm as identified by probing and on radiographs. The following clinical parameters were evaluated prior to and 1 and 4 years after treatment: probing depth, recession of the gingival margin, and clinical attachment level. The primary outcome variable was clinical attachment. Mean probing depth was reduced from 8.1 +/- 1.8 mm to 3.8 - +/-.2 mm at 1 year and to 4.0 +/- 1.2 mm at 4 years. No statistically significant differences were found between the mean probing depth 1 and 4 years postoperative. At 1 year, the mean recession increased from 1.9 +/- 1.5 mm to 3.2 +/- 1.8 mm; at 4 years, it was 2.8 +/- 1.2 mm, a statistically significant improvement compared to the 1-year results, but still significantly increased compared to the baseline. The mean attachment level changed from 10.0 +/- 2.4 mm to 7.0 +/- 2.1 mm at 1 year and 6.8 +/- 1.9 mm at 4 years (no statistically significant difference). The clinical improvements obtained following treatment with EMD can be maintained over a 4-year period.     

Root coverage with a coronally positioned flap used in combination with enamel matrix derivative: 18-month clinical evaluation

BACKGROUND: Ginigival recession can be successfully treated with coronally positioned flaps. Twelve-month data failed to demonstrate that topical application of enamel matrix derivative (EMD) used in combination with the coronally positioned flap enhances clinical outcomes of the surgical technique used alone. This study was designed to examine the effects of EMD combined with the coronally positioned flap over an 18-month postoperative period. METHODS: Thirty patients presenting with Miller Class I or II gingival recessions on single-rooted teeth participated in this parallel-design clinical study. Six weeks after phase I therapy, recession areas were surgically treated with a coronally positioned flap for root coverage. Teeth in the experimental group received EMD treatment of the exposed root, whereas control teeth did not. Clinical parameters evaluated at baseline and 18 months postoperatively included gingival recession, clinical attachment level, probing depth, and the apico-coronal dimension of the keratinized tissue. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, 18-month measurements showed a significant reduction in probing depth, gain in attachment level, and decrease in gingival recession for control and experimental groups. When the results of the two treatment groups were compared, the experimental group presented with significantly greater root coverage than the control group (2.66 +/- 0.61 mm versus 1.73 +/- 0.70 mm, respectively), more gain in clinical attachment than the control group (2.80 +/- 0.76 mm versus 2.06 +/- 0.70 mm, respectively), and a greater gain in the apico-coronal dimension of the keratinized tissue than the control group (0.13 +/- 0.06 mm versus -0.06 +/- 0.01 mm, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that topical application of EMD is beneficial in augmenting the effects of the coronally positioned flap in terms of amount of root coverage, gain in clinical attachment, and in increasing the apico-coronal dimension of the keratinized tissue.     

Clinical outcomes following treatment of human intrabony defects with GTR/bone replacement material or access flap alone. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial

AIM: This prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of papilla preservation flap surgery with or without the application of a guided tissue regeneration (GTR)/bone replacement material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty-four patients with advanced chronic periodontitis were recruited in 10 centers in seven countries. All patients had at least one intrabony defect of > or = 3 mm. The surgical procedures included access for root instrumentation using either the simplified or the modified papilla preservation flap in order to obtain optimal tissue adaptation and primary closure. After debridement, the regenerative material was applied in the test subjects, and omitted in the controls. At baseline and 1 year following the interventions, clinical attachment levels (CALs), probing pocket depths (PPDs), recession, full-mouth plaque scores and full-mouth bleeding scores (FMBS) were assessed. RESULTS: One year after treatment, the test defects gained 3.3 +/- 1.7 mm of CAL, while the control defects yielded a significantly lower CAL gain of 2.5 +/- 1.5 mm. Pocket reduction was also significantly higher in the test group (3.7 +/- 1.8 mm) when compared with the controls (3.2 +/- 1.5 mm). A multivariate analysis indicated that the treatment, the clinical centers, baseline PPD and baseline FMBS significantly influenced CAL gains. Odds ratios (ORs) of achieving above-median CAL gains were significantly improved by the test procedure (OR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.2-5.4) and by starting with deeper PPD (OR = 1.7, 1.3-2.2) but were decreased by receiving treatment at the worst-performing clinical center (OR = 0.9, 0.76-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this trial indicated that regenerative periodontal surgery with a GTR/bone replacement material offers an additional benefit in terms of CAL gains, PPD reductions and predictability of outcomes with respect to papilla preservation flaps alone.     

Periodontal treatment with an Er:YAG laser or scaling and root planing. A 2-year follow-up split-mouth study

BACKGROUND: Non-surgical periodontal treatment with an Er:YAG laser has been shown to result in significant clinical attachment level gain; however, clinical results have not been established on a long-term basis following Er:YAG laser treatment. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to present the 2-year results following non-surgical periodontal treatment with an Er:YAG laser or scaling and root planing. METHODS: Twenty patients with moderate to advanced periodontal destruction were treated under local anesthesia, and the quadrants were randomly allocated in a split-mouth design to either 1) Er:YAG laser (ERL) using an energy level of 160 mJ/pulse and 10 Hz, or 2) scaling and root planing (SRP) using hand instruments. The following clinical parameters were evaluated at baseline and at 1 and 2 years after treatment: plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), gingival recession (GR), and clinical attachment level (CAL). Subgingival plaque samples were taken at each appointment and analyzed using dark-field microscopy for the presence of cocci, non-motile rods, motile rods, and spirochetes. The primary outcome variable was CAL. No statistically significant differences between the groups were found at baseline. Power analysis to determine superiority of ERL treatment showed that the available sample size would yield 99% power to detect a 1 mm difference. RESULTS: The sites treated with ERL demonstrated mean CAL change from 6.3 +/- 1.1 mm to 4.5 +/- 0.4 mm (P < 0.001) and to 4.9 +/- 0.4 mm (P < 0.001) at 1 and 2 years, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the CAL mean at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. The sites treated with SRP showed a mean CAL change from 6.5 +/- 1.0 mm to 5.6 +/- 0.4 mm (P < 0.001) and to 5.8 +/- 0.4 mm (P < 0.001) at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The CAL change between 1 and 2 years did not present statistically significant differences. Both groups showed a significant increase of cocci and non-motile rods and a decrease in the amount of spirochetes. However, at the 1- and 2-year examination, the statistical analysis showed a significant difference for the CAL (P < 0.001, respectively) between the 2 treatment groups. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the CAL gain obtained following non-surgical periodontal treatment with ERL or SRP can be maintained over a 2-year period.