Epidemic outbreaks control involving Staphylococcus aureus with reduced sensitivity to glycopeptides

This study describes two epidemic outbreaks involving Staphylococcus aureus with reduced sensitivity to glycopeptides, one in 2000 involving eight patients and the other in 2001-2002 involving 16 patients. These strains were detected rapidly, thanks to routine screening for the offending organisms in the bacteriology laboratory of our hospital. The clonal character of these strains was confirmed by pulsed field electrophoresis. The management of these epidemic outbreaks confirmed (i) the need for systematic adoption of standard precautions, (ii) the importance of circulating information in combating multi-resistant bacteria, as well as the difficulties in transferring colonised patients to different hospital wards, and (iii) the intermittent nature of S. aureus carriage, resulting in a need for prolonged surveillance of colonised and/or infected patients. In addition, our study underlines the value of a multi-disciplinary approach to the management of diffusion of multi-resistant bacteria.     

Incidence of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides in two French hospitals

Objectives   To determine the incidence of Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides among all clinical isolates collected consecutively in two French hospitals between November 1998 and April 1999.
Methods   Methicillin-resistant and -susceptible S. aureus isolates were screened on vancomycin- or teicoplanin-supplemented agar plates. Glycopeptide MICs were determined by the E test procedure with a high inoculum and by an agar dilution technique. Glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus isolates were identified as homogeneously or heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin by performing population analysis.
Results   Of the 640 isolates recovered from 518 patients, three from the same patient and two from two different patients showed homogeneous or heterogeneous intermediate resistance to vancomycin.
Conclusion   The incidence of glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (homogeneously or heterogeneously resistant) in a non-selected patient population, i.e. regardless of predisposing factors and glycopeptide therapeutics, remains low in the two French hospitals involved in the study, representing 0.6% of isolates.     

Outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides in a Parisian hospital

Epidemiological relationships were investigated between 40 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains with decreased glycopeptide susceptibility isolated from November 1998 to March 1999 from 39 patients (17 infected and 22 colonized patients) in nine wards of the Broussais Hospital, Paris, France. Reduced glycopeptide susceptibility was readily detected on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar containing 6 microg of teicoplanin per ml and on gradient plates, but not by the standard disk diffusion method. The MICs of vancomycin and teicoplanin, determined on BHI agar, were 4 and 8 to 32 microg/ml, respectively (standard antibiotic dilution), and 4 to 8 and 8 to 32 microg/ml, respectively (E-test). All strains were resistant to macrolides, aminoglycosides, tetracycline, rifampin, sulfonamides, and pefloxacin, showed reduced susceptibility to fusidic acid and fosfomycin, and were susceptible to trimethoprim and chloramphenicol. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and lysotyping revealed that a multidrug-resistant MRSA clone with decreased susceptibility to glycopeptides has been discretely endemic since at least 1996 in our institution, where it was responsible for an outbreak in November and December 1998.     

Low prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides in Belgian hospitals

Staphylococcus aureus strains with decreased susceptibility to glycopeptides (GISA) have been associated with increased risk of glycopeptide treatment failure. To assess the prevalence of these strains in hospitalised patients in Belgium, 455 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates collected in 2001 were screened by two assays: (i) growth on vancomycin agar screen (VAS; brain heart infusion agar (BHI) + vancomycin 6 mg/L); and (ii) a synergy/antagonism test with aztreonam/cefazolin on Mu3 agar (BHI + vancomycin 3 mg/mL). Isolates growing on VAS or Mu3 agar were characterised further by analysis of population susceptibility profiles. MICs of glycopeptides were determined by agar dilution, broth microdilution and Etest (low and high inocula) methods. The isolates were genotyped by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and determination of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type. No GISA isolates were found. Three (0.7%) hetero-vancomycin intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) and ten (2.2%) hetero-teicoplanin intermediate S. aureus (hTISA) isolates were identified by population analysis. All but one hetero-GISA isolate belonged to either epidemic PFGE group A/SCCmec type I (69%) or PFGE group D/SCCmec type I (23%), both of which were resistant to gentamicin. The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of hetero-GISA by the two assays were 15.4% and 99.8%, respectively, for VAS, and 84.6% and 95.9%, respectively, for Mu3. The data indicated that hetero-GISA strains were uncommon among Belgian MRSA isolates from hospitalised patients. Use of Mu3 agar was more sensitive, but less specific, than VAS as a screening method.     

High percentage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides in The Netherlands

While testing the in vitro activities of 14 antimicrobial agents against 107 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and 250 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates collected in The Netherlands, we found to our surprise that 19 (7.6%) MRSA isolates were suspected of having reduced susceptibilities to the glycopeptides when the Etest system (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) was used with a large inoculum (no. 2 McFarland standard) and an extended incubation time (48 h) on brain heart infusion agar for MIC testing. Eventually, 15 of these isolates were classified as heterogeneously resistant to glycopeptides (heterogeneously glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus [hGISA] isolates) according to the population analysis profile-area under the curve analysis. The MICs at which 50 and 90% of isolates are inhibited obtained with the Etest system with the large inoculum were as follows: for MSSA isolates, 3.0 and 4.0 micro g/ml, respectively, for both teicoplanin and vancomycin; for MRSA isolates, 3.0 and 8.0 micro g/ml, respectively, for teicoplanin, and 3.0 and 4.0 micro g/ml, respectively, for vancomycin. This is the first report of hGISA isolates in The Netherlands.     

A multicenter study evaluating the current strategies for isolating Staphylococcus aureus strains with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides

Glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (GISA) and heterogeneous GISA (hGISA) strains are notoriously difficult to detect in the diagnostic laboratory. The clinical importance of GISA, and particularly hGISA, will only be obvious when a definitive detection method is available. A few novel GISA and hGISA detection methods have been proposed; however, their validity has never been tested on a significant scale and in different laboratories. This study compares three screening methods for detecting GISA and hGISA strains in 12 laboratories, using a blind panel of 48 strains with known glycopeptide susceptibilities. The three screening methods used were brain heart infusion agar with 6 mg/liter vancomycin (BHIA6V) (CDC/CLSI), Mueller-Hinton agar with 5 mg/liter teicoplanin (MHA5T) (European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System [EARSS]), and the macrodilution method Etest (MET) (EARSS), with population analysis profile-area under the curve analysis as the gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were highest for MHA5T and MET, which identified 82.5% and 85.9% of strains, respectively. BHIA6V had poor sensitivity, particularly for hGISA (11.5% of strains were detected), and gave the largest interlaboratory variation in performance. MET exhibited the least interlaboratory variation. It is essential that laboratories use appropriate methods to detect GISA/hGISA strains so that the prevalence and clinical importance of these strains can be assessed properly.     

Methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to quinolones

Since January 1988, Staphylococcus aureus strains with a high level of quinolone resistance have been isolated at 17 hospitals and 15 nursing homes in New York City. The majority of these strains were methicillin resistant. The bacteriophage types and susceptibility to other antibiotics were similar to those of quinolone-susceptible strains isolated at the same hospitals.     

Detection of an outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides in a French hospital

Staphylococcus aureus isolates were screened for reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides with an initial glycopeptide agar screening test, followed by confirmation of the strains thus identified by two Etest strip techniques and population analysis. This procedure detected 48 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides from 24 patients among 883 MRSA isolates tested. The dissemination of a single clone was confirmed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.     

In vitro and in vivo activities of linezolid alone and combined with vancomycin and imipenem against Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides

The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo efficacies of linezolid (35 mg/kg/5 h), vancomycin (60 mg/kg/5 h), imipenem (30 mg/kg/5 h), linezolid+imipenem, linezolid+vancomycin and vancomycin+imipenem against two clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides using time–kill curves and the murine peritonitis model. Time–kill curves were performed over 24 h. For the murine peritonitis model, peritonitis was induced by the intraperitoneal inoculation of 10⁸ CFU/ml of each bacterial strain. Four hours later (0 h), the mice were randomly assigned to a control group or to therapeutic groups receiving subcutaneous treatment for 25 h. Bacterial counts in peritoneal fluid, bacteraemia and mortality rates were determined. The time–kill curves showed that the addition of linezolid to imipenem yielded synergistic results after 24 h. The addition of linezolid decreased vancomycin activity. In the animal model, vancomycin and linezolid monotherapies produced comparable bacterial decreases in mice infected with each strain but linezolid achieved higher rates of blood sterilisation. Linezolid tested either in monotherapy or in combination showed similar efficacy against both strains in terms of bacterial killing, number of negative blood cultures and survival. Linezolid and vancomycin were moderately bactericidal and similar in efficacy against glycopeptide-intermediate or -resistant S. aureus. Linezolid combinations, as effective as linezolid tested alone, could be considered as alternative options for the treatment of glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) infections.