Avoidance of cyclosporine in renal transplantation: effects of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids

Cyclosporine (CsA) has been implicated in both acute and chronic graft dysfunction. The addition of humanized IL-2 receptor antibody daclizumab (DZB) to CsA-based immunosuppression decreases the rate of acute renal transplant rejection. Therefore, 45 patients were evaluated in an immunosuppressive protocol that included DZB, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids without CsA. This was a prospective, nonrandomized, open-label trial of the efficacy and safety of the treatment. DZB was given intravenously at 2 mg/kg before transplantation and then at 1 mg/kg every 2 wk for four doses, MMF was given orally at 3 g/d, and methylprednisolone/prednisone was given at 7 mg/kg per day and tapered to 15 mg/d at 6 mo. CsA was added to the regimen when patients developed acute rejection episodes or adverse effects to steroids or MMF; 49% of patients were spared CsA maintenance. Patients without CsA had lower serum creatinine at 6 mo and needed fewer medications to control BP. Incidence of biopsyproven rejections was 31% and occurred early (median, 10 d). These rejection episodes occurred earlier in cadaver transplants (median, 7 d) and later in living donor transplants (median, 62 days). Acute rejections occurred at a higher frequency (46% versus 34%) and earlier (6.5 versus 15 d) in patients with delayed graft function compared with patients without delayed graft function. Most of the rejections were moderate and easily reversible. The actuarial 1-yr graft survival was 95% with 100% patient survival.     

Results of kidney transplantation in patients receiving MMF- or MMF and basiliximab-containing immunosuppression

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a more potent immunosuppressive drug than azathioprine or mizoribine in combination with cyclosporine (CsA) and steroids. Recently, basiliximab (BA), an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist, has become available in Japan. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an extremely low CsA dose immunosuppressive protocol with MMF versus MMF plus BA after renal transplantation (RTx). PATIENTS: Between September 2001 and March 2003, we performed 79 RTx with CsA-based immunosuppression, including nine from cadavers and 70 from living donors with 15 ABO-incompatible RTx. Immunosuppression consisted of methylprednisolone (MP), CsA and MMF (group 1; n = 24) versus added BA during the induction phase (group 2; n = 55). In group 2, MP was withdrawn on postoperative day 14. Supplementary MP, muromonab-CD3, or gusperimus was administered if rejection was suspected clinically or diagnosed by biopsy. RESULTS: The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (AR) was significantly higher among group 1 than group 2 patients (P < .05). CsA C2 levels in group 1 were significantly higher than group 2 at each time (P < .01). The incidence of infection was comparable. Patient and graft survival rates in group 1 were 100% and 100%; in group 2, they were 98% and 98%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The short-term results of RTx were favorable in both the MMF, and the MMF plus BA immunosuppression. In addition, BA significantly reduced the number of AR episodes. Early steroid withdrawal in recipients receiving BA induction was not associated with an increased risk of AR.     

Cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive strategies for kidney recipients: interim analysis of German data from the Multinational Observational Study (MOST)

INTRODUCTION: We collected data from kidney recipients with a functioning graft at German kidney transplant centers in order to analyze the efficacy of various cyclosporine (CsA)-based immunosuppressive strategies, the effects of different perioperative and maintenance regimens, and the impact of donor source on clinical outcome. METHODS: As part of the ongoing prospective Multinational Observational Study in Transplantation (MOST), data for both prospective and retrospective analysis were collected from kidney recipients over 18 years bearing a functioning graft that was transplanted at 21 German kidney transplant centers between 1987 and 2002. RESULTS: Data from 1223 renal graft recipients, including their CsA-based immunosuppressive regimens, were stratified as: 402 de novo patients (median 6.8 months posttransplant) and 821 patients on maintenance therapy (median 71 months posttransplant). Triple regimens with CsA + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + steroids (Ste) currently comprise the major perioperative immunosuppressive strategies in Germany (de novo 65%). IL-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2Ra) use is increasing (de novo 18%, maintenance 4%), while mono and dual regimen use de novo is declining (de novo 4%, maintenance 20%). Among 689 patients transplanted between 1987 and 2002 with outcome data, the mean incidence of acute rejection during the first posttransplant year was 21.6%. Rejection rates on initial therapy with CsA + MMF + Ste +/- antibodies (n = 517) averaged 17.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Between 1987 and 2002, CsA-based immunosuppression combined with MMF and Ste became the most commonly used strategy for both initial and maintenance therapy after kidney transplantation in Germany, yielding the low acute rejection rates particularly when combined with IL-2Ra.     

Observations on quadruple immunosuppression maintenance therapy using rapamycin, low-dose cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone following ATG induction

INTRODUCTION: We prospectively evaluated an immunosuppressive regimen consisting of rapamycin (Rapa), low-dose cyclosporine (CsA), low-dose mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone (group 1) versus a regimen of CsA, MMF, and prednisone (group 2) in mismatched living related donor (LRD) and living unrelated donor (LUD) kidney transplantation. METHODS: Group 1 included 24 transplant recipients of eight mismatched LRD and 16 LUD, treated with Rapa, low-dose MMF, CsA, and prednisone. Group 2 included 53 transplant recipients (25 LRD, 27 LUD, and one cadaveric donor), treated with MMF, CsA, and prednisone. All patients in group 1 received a single bolus of rabbit-anti-human T-lymphocyte immune serum (ATG-Fresenius 4 to 6 mg/kg). In group 2, patients received either a single ATG or an extended ATG course (3 to 5 days postoperatively). RESULTS: Acute rejection occurred in one patient in group 1 (4.2%) and in five patients (9.4%) in group 2, all of which resulted in graft loss. Serum creatinine was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The immunosuppressive protocol of Rapa, CsA, MMF, and prednisone with single-bolus induction ATG achieves excellent immunosuppression and graft survival with no apparent risks in the short and intermediate term.     

Anti-interleukin 2 receptor antibodies and mycophenolate mofetil for treatment of steroid-resistant rejection in adult liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Steroid-resistant rejection (SRR) results in significant morbidity and mortality from the adverse effects of rescue therapy and in graft loss from chronic rejection. In our knowledge, the efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin (IL) 2r antibodies (daclizumab and basiliximab) for the treatment of SRR in adult liver transplantation has not previously been evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-five patients received either daclizumab or basiliximab as rescue therapy for SRR. Outcome and biochemical parameters were recorded before and after treatment with an anti-IL-2r antibody. RESULTS: The median time from transplantation to SRR was 25 days. Secondary immunosuppression included mycophenolate mofetil in 18 patients. Twelve patients (48%) had complete resolution of SRR. Aspartate transaminase levels normalized at a median of 37 days (range, 1-168 days). In 13 patients (52%) progressive hepatic dysfunction developed. Four of these patients received another transplant, and 6 patients had chronic rejection. Three patients died with graft failure. Of 16 patients with acute cellular rejection, 12 (75%) had resolution, 2 had chronic rejection, 1 required a repeat transplantation, and 1 died with graft failure. In contrast, all 9 patients with established chronic rejection in their pretreatment biopsy continued to have significant graft dysfunction, with 4 having persistent chronic graft dysfunction, 3 requiring repeat transplantation, and 2 dying with graft failure. CONCLUSION: Twelve (48%) of 25 patients who received an anti-IL-2r antibody because of SRR were successfully treated. All successfully treated patients had ongoing acute cellular rejection at liver biopsy (75%), whereas patients with histologic evidence of chronic rejection responded poorly.     

Immunosuppression for Dual Kidney Transplantation with Marginal Organs: The Old Is Better Yet

Immunosuppressive protocols in dual kidney transplantation (DKT) are based on calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). We wonder whether a CNI-free immunosuppression can improve outcome in older patients receiving a DKT with marginal donor organs. Thirty-six were treated with CsA, MMF and prednisone (CsA group) and 42 with rATG, SRL, MMF and prednisone (SRL group). Incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection was 44% and 11% in the CsA group, and 40% and 8% in the SRL group. CMV infection incidence was low in both protocols. Three-year patient survival was 89% in the CsA and 76% in the SRL group. One- and 3-year graft survival after censoring for dead with a functioning allograft was 94.2% and 94% in CsA and 95% and 90% in SRL, respectively. Renal function was similar in both groups whereas proteinuria was higher in the SRL group. Uninephrectomy due to graft thrombosis or urinary-related complications was numerically higher in the SRL (21%) than in the CsA group (8%) (p = 0.13) and it was associated with renal failure and proteinuria. In DKT, a new induction immunosuppressive protocol based on rATG, SRL, MMF and prednisone does not offer any advantage in comparison to the old CsA, MMF and prednisone.     

Steroid avoidance in renal transplantation using basiliximab induction, cyclosporine-based immunosuppression and protocol biopsies

BACKGROUND: Reducing chronic steroid exposure is important to minimize steroid-related morbidity, particularly for susceptible renal transplant recipients. Steroid-free and steroid-sparing protocols have shown benefits, but safety has not been established for all populations. We investigated the safety of steroid avoidance (SA) in a population including African-Americans, using modern immunosuppression with protocol biopsy monitoring. METHODS: A randomized-controlled SA trial (early discontinuation, days 2-7) was conducted in a population (n = 77) including African-Americans and cadaveric kidney recipients. Patients received basiliximab, cyclosporine (CsA), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). In controls, steroids were tapered to 5 mg prednisone/d by day 30. Protocol biopsies were performed (1, 6, 12 and 24 months) to evaluate subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). RESULTS: The SA did not result in significantly higher incidences of graft loss, AR, SCAR, CAN, or renal fibrosis. SA patients experienced similar renal function, comparable serum lipid levels, and a trend toward fewer cases of new-onset diabetes. Clinical outcomes of African-American and non-African-American patients did not significantly differ. CONCLUSIONS: The SA is safe in the context of basiliximab induction and CsA-based immunosuppression. This protocol could minimize steroid-related side effects in susceptible groups, including African-Americans, without increasing the risk of AR or graft failure.     

A cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimen may be better than tacrolimus for long-term liver allograft survival in recipients transplanted for hepatitis C

Rapid recurrence of severe hepatitis C (HCV) after liver transplantation is a major barrier to survival of the transplanted liver. While cyclosporine (CsA) in vitro has been shown to suppress HCV replication, an effect is not seen with tacrolimus (Tac). Evidence is inconsistent whether or how this translates to clinical practice. To expand the evidence on this issue, we analyzed graft survival and histological outcomes after liver transplantation for HCV hepatitis. METHODS: Using our longitudinal database (1991 onward) graft outcomes for all liver transplant recipients with HCV were evaluated (105 grafts in 97 patients). Severe activity, severe fibrosis, and graft survival were analyzed. All liver biopsies were scored (blinded) according to the Ludwig scale. Immunosuppression was based on prednisone and a calcineurin inhibitor (Tac n = 89, 85%; CsA n = 15, 14%). Comparisons of outcomes using CsA versus Tac therapy were done using survival analysis via the log-rank test. RESULTS: Graft survival was significantly better in the CsA group. Although there was no apparent difference in severe activity (grade 2), there was a statistically significant difference in graft survival without fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (P = .01) and a trend toward a difference in fibrosis-free survival (P = 0.1). The rate of sustained response to antiviral therapy was twice as high in the CsA group, 50% versus 22% (P = 0.16; NS). CONCLUSIONS: Graft survival in liver transplant recipients with HCV may be greater with CsA-based immunosuppression. There may also be a lower rate of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis in this group.     

The incidence and impact of early rejection episodes on graft outcome in recipients of first cadaver kidney transplants.

The objective of this study was to define the incidence and significance of acute rejection occurring in the first year following transplantation. The influence of contemporary induction immunosuppression on rejection, as well as the effect of rejection on graft and patient loss, renal function, and maintenance immunosuppression during the first year in 110 recipients of first cadaver renal transplants were analyzed. All patients received CsA, Aza, and prednisone for 30 days with withdrawal of Aza at 30 days and then prednisone at 105 days; 57 patients were prospectively randomized to receive ALG (Merieux) until serum creatinine was less than 300 mumol/L. Short-term ALG administration did not influence the incidence, severity, nature, or outcome of rejection episodes. Fifty-five (50%) patients had at least 1 rejection in the first 90 days. All patients with delayed graft function and 7/8 (88%) sensitized patients (current PRA greater than 50%) had at least 1 rejection episode; 71% (n = 35) of all rejection episodes occurred in the first 30 days posttransplant. Patients rejection free at 90 days remained rejection free the entire first year. Graft loss was 18% for rejections in the first month, 13% for rejections occurring later (P = NS); 20% (n = 11) of patients had a second rejection and 1% (n = 2) had a third rejection. The risk of graft loss was 9% with a first rejection, 38% with a second rejection, and 50% with a third rejection. Of 12 (22%) rejections that were steroid resistant, 10 (83%) were reversed with OKT3. One-year graft survival for patients without rejection, with steroid-sensitive rejection, and with steroid-resistant rejection was 96%, 88% (P = ns), and 58% (P less than 0.001), respectively; 1 year SCr was 168 +/- 93, 196 +/- 77 (P = ns), and 268 +/- 96 microMol/L (P less than 0.05), respectively. Patients free of rejection and with stable renal function continued to do well on maintenance CsA monotherapy, and they were more likely to be on CsA monotherapy than those with rejection episodes (P less than 0.01).     

Maintenance immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids in pediatric kidney transplantation: temporary benefit but not without risk

BACKGROUND: Aiming at reducing cyclosporine toxicity, we investigated safety and efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as an immunosuppressive drug in pediatric kidney transplantation compared with cyclosporine (CsA), both in combination with corticosteroids. METHODS: One year after kidney transplantation, children on triple immunosuppression, having experienced no more than one, steroid-sensitive, acute rejection episode, were randomized to withdrawal of either CsA or MMF and were followed for 2 yr. RESULTS: In each group, two patients had an acute rejection episode during withdrawal. Treatment failure occurred in 3 of 21 MMF and 5 of 23 CsA patients. Final analysis was for 18 patients in either group. A larger than 10 mL/min 1.73 m decrease in glomerular filtration rate was observed in more patients on CsA than on MMF (73% vs. 29%, P=0.019). No differences in blood pressure or nightly decrease of blood pressure were noted. Hypercholesterolism improved in the MMF (-16%), but not the CsA group (+5%, P<0.05), over the first, but not over both study years. Differences in triglycerid levels between groups were not shown. At study end, MMF patients tended to have lower hemoglobin levels than patients on CsA. Two MMF patients experienced a first acute rejection episode during the second study year, resulting in chronic transplant glomerulopathy with graft loss in one and deterioration of kidney function in the other. CONCLUSION: In pediatric kidney transplantation, maintenance immunosuppression with MMF together with corticosteroids has short-term benefits for kidney function and lipid pattern compared with CsA but is not without risk of complications.     

Risk factors for second renal allografts immunosuppressed with cyclosporine

Second renal allograft survival rates are lower than those of primary allografts. For recipients immunosuppressed with azathioprine, prednisone, and Minnesota ALG (conventional immunosuppression), risk factors associated with decreased second graft survival have been identified: age greater than 40, cadaver donor, less than 6 months between primary graft loss and retransplantation, duration of primary graft function (6 months or 1 year, depending on the study), high peak panel-reactive antibody, number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches, and delayed graft function. In this study, we used a multivariate analysis to identify risk factors associated with decreased second graft survival in patients who did or did not receive cyclosporine. Results were compared with primary graft survival rates. Risk factors for patients receiving conventional immunosuppression were: (a) primary graft loss caused by rejection greater than or equal to 6 months (P = 0.01 vs. either rejection less than 6 months or nonimmunologic loss); (b) cadaver donor (P = 0.005 vs. living related); and (c) interval between primary graft loss and retransplantation of greater than or equal to 6 months (P = 0.05 vs. less than 6 months). For CsA, risk factors that most decreased second graft survival were: (a) primary graft loss caused by rejection less than 6 months (P = 0.11 vs. nonimmunologic loss); (b) conventional immunosuppression for the primary graft (P = 0.08 vs. CsA immunosuppression); and (c) a peak PRA of greater than or equal to 21 (P = 0.14 vs. peak PRA of 1-20). For second graft recipients immunosuppressed with CsA, primary graft loss to either rejection greater than 6 months posttransplant or nonimmunologic causes was not a risk factor for second graft survival. These data extend the recent reports of other investigators by identifying risk factors for retransplant recipients treated with CsA and by demonstrating that subgroups of patients in the retransplant population can be retransplanted without additional risk (i.e., their second graft survival rates are similar to primary graft survival rates). This may become more important if, in the future, organ distribution is based on graft survival data. If so, our data would support retransplantation in patients who are immunosuppressed with CsA, especially those who lost their primary graft to either rejection greater than or equal to 6 months posttransplant or nonimmunologic causes; who receive living related grafts; and who have a peak PRA of 1-20.     

Selective use of mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant patients in Indian scenario

PURPOSE: Although mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a valuable immunosuppressive in renal transplantation, its high cost demands that it be used selectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospectively study included 55 renal transplant patients on MMF for rescue therapy after treatment of acute vascular rejection (n = 45), acute/chronic liver disease with elevated transaminases (n = 4), early chronic rejection (n = 2), cyclosporine toxicity (n = 3), and cyclosporine-induced hemolytic-uremic syndrome (n = 1). The patients were given 1.5 to 2 g MMF in divided doses for at least 6 months, depending upon the tolerability, adverse effects, and finances, and followed for 1 year. The patients on MMF following treatment of acute rejections were compared with controls who received azathioprine-based triple immunosuppression after treatment of an acute rejection episode. RESULTS: The incidence of recurrent acute rejection in the first year was 18% in the MMF group compared to 42% in the control group (P < .005). The serum transaminases in the acute/chronic liver disease group reached normal levels at 3 to 6 months. The serum creatinine remained stable for a mean duration of 8 months in the early chronic rejection patients. The patients with cyclosporine toxicity showed stable graft function on low-dose cyclosporine. The patient with hemolytic-uremic syndrome showed stable graft function for 4 years. The MMF-based triple regimen is two times more expensive than an azathioprine-based regimen. CONCLUSION: MMF significantly decreases the recurrence of acute rejection. It is a good alternative agent in special situations like acute/chronic liver diseases with elevated transaminases, early chronic rejection, cyclosporine toxicity, and cyclosporine-induced hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Because of the high cost it should be used selectively in our population.     

Cyclosporine withdrawal in stable renal transplant recipients after azathioprine-mycophenolate mofetil conversion

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine A (CsA) nephrotoxicity is a nonimmunologic factor of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) in kidney transplant recipients. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may allow CsA dosage reduction or even complete withdrawal in selected populations with CsA nephrotoxicity or CAD. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CsA withdrawal after azathioprine (AZA)-MMF conversion in a population of stable renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Twenty-eight first cadaver kidney recipients were included. AZA was then discontinued, MMF was introduced and after 4 months CsA was completely withdrawn. All patients underwent inuline clearance measurement and renal biopsy at inclusion and at the end of the follow-up (40 wk). RESULTS: CsA was completely discontinued in 20 patients. No patient lost his graft during the study period, but 1 patient experienced a reversible acute rejection episode. Inuline clearance improved significantly in the whole series. At the end of follow-up, histological worsening was observed in 50% of patients without any specific risk factor. In these patients, inuline clearance did not improve. Systolic blood pressure, the need for anti-hypertensive drugs and HDL cholesterol improved. CONCLUSION: In stable kidney transplant recipients, CsA withdrawal after AZA replacement by MMF switch was safe with regard to acute rejection. It improved blood pressure and the lipid profile, but, in 50% of patients was associated with histologic deterioration.     

Withdrawal of cyclosporine or prednisone six months after kidney transplantation in patients on triple drug therapy: a randomized, prospective, multicenter study

Uncertainty exists regarding the necessity of continuing triple therapy consisting of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine (CsA), and prednisone (Pred) after kidney transplantation (RTx). At 6 mo after RTx, 212 patients were randomized to stop CsA (n = 63), stop Pred (n = 76), or continue triple drug therapy (n = 73). The MMF dose was 1000 mg twice daily, target CsA trough levels were 150 ng/ml, and Pred dose was 0.10 mg/kg per d. Follow-up was until 24 mo after RTx. Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 14 (22%) of 63 patients after CsA withdrawal compared with 3 (4%) of 76 in the Pred withdrawal group (P = 0.001) and 1 (1.4%) of 73 in the control group (P = 0.0001). Biopsy-proven chronic rejection was present in one patient in the control group, in nine patients after CsA withdrawal (P = 0.006 versus control group); and in four patients after discontinuation of Pred (NS). Graft loss occurred in two versus one patient after CsA or Pred withdrawal, respectively, and in two patients in the control group (NS). Patients who successfully withdrew CsA had a significantly lower serum creatinine during follow-up. Pred withdrawal resulted in a reduction in mean arterial pressure, and the total cholesterol/HDL ratio increased. In conclusion, rapid CsA withdrawal at 6 mo after RTx results in a significantly increased incidence of biopsy-proven acute and chronic rejection. Pred withdrawal was safe and resulted in a reduction in mean arterial pressure. However, patient and graft survival and renal function 2 yr after RTx were not different among groups.     

肾移植急性排斥后环孢素切换成他克莫司对移植肾的影响

目的 探讨肾移植术后急性排斥发生后环孢素（CsA）切换成他克莫司（FK506）抗排斥治疗对移植肾的影响。 方法 回顾性分析本中心肾移植患者发生病理证实的急性排斥86例,经过抗排斥治疗后有23例由CsA治疗切换成FK506为基础的免疫抑制治疗（FK506组）,63例继续应用CsA为基础的免疫抑制治疗（CsA组）。比较两组临床资料,包括性别、年龄、冷和热缺血时间、淋巴毒、术前群体反应性抗体（PRA）水平、人类白细胞抗原（HLA）错配、血脂、血清肌酐、血尿酸、再次排斥的发生率和移植肾存活等情况。 结果 抗排斥治疗后1年内再次病理证实的排斥率,FK506组显著低于CsA组[1/23（4.35%）比16/63（25.40%）,P = 0.033]。FK506组急性排斥发生后5年内的移植肾存活率为100%,高于CsA组的81.4%。FK506组急性排斥发生后24个月及36个月血尿酸分别为（265.5±147.9） μmol/L和（245.8±88.9） μmol/L,均显著低于CsA组的（428.5±119.3） μmol/L和（441.2±125.3） μmol/L（P < 0.01）。 结论 肾移植术后急性排斥发生后由CsA治疗切换成FK506治疗可降低再次排斥的发生率,而降低血尿酸水平有利移植肾的存活。     

Mycophenolate mofetil, with cyclosporine and prednisone, reduces early rejection while allowing the use of less antilymphocytic agent induction and cyclosporine in renal recipients with delayed graft function

Antilymphocytic agent induction (ALAI), with antithymocyte globulin or monoclonal antibody, is generally used in renal transplantation (TX) to spare renal allografts with poor initial function from the toxic effects of cyclosporine (CsA) and/or to augment immunosuppression (IS) in the patient at a high risk for early rejection. ALAI, unfortunately, increases the cost of TX and the risk to the patient, having been associated with many adverse side effects. An IS protocol, which results in a low incidence of early rejection while using less CsA and ALAI, is a worthwhile goal.
We compare our experience with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), CsA, and prednisone (MMFCP; n=62) to our azathioprine (AZA), CsA, and prednisone (AZACP; n=50) triple‐drug IS, with and without ALAI. The patient characteristics for age, race, first TX, cadaveric donor, pediatric recipient, and dialysis in the first post‐op week (DGF) were not different for the MMFCP versus AZACP groups. There were more females in the MMFCP group (51.6% versus 30.0%, p=0.022).
We report that rejection‐free survival at 6 months (RF6) was better in the MMFCP versus AZACP group (83.9% versus 60.0%, p=0.005). Less ALAI and CsA were used in the MMFCP patients. At 1 year, actuarial graft survival was 91.9% in the MMFCP group and 81.9% in the AZACP group (p=0.116). Actuarial 1‐year patient survivals were not different in the two patient groups. In the sub‐population of patients with DGF, the RF6 in the MMFCP (n=13) group was 92.3% versus 57.1% in the AZACP (n=14) group (p=0.041). The reduction in early rejection episodes in the patients on MMFCP with DGF was accomplished while using half as much ALAI and lower CsA doses and levels. The African‐American recipient sub‐population on MMFCP also demonstrated an improvement in RF6 while using less ALAI and CsA (78.6% versus 48.0%, p=0.022).
We conclude that the use of MMF‐based triple‐drug IS results in fewer rejection episodes while allowing for lower CsA levels and less ALAI, even in patients with delayed graft function.     

Efficacy on Renal Function of Early Conversion from Cyclosporine to Sirolimus 3 Months After Renal Transplantation: Concept Study

Sirolimus (SRL) allows to minimize the use of cyclosporine (CsA), but de novo administration after transplantation is associated with various complications. We report a prospective, open-label, multicenter randomized study to evaluate conversion from a CsA-based regimen to a SRL-based regimen 3 months after transplantation. One hundred ninety-two of a total of 237 patients were eligible at 3 months to be converted to SRL (n = 95) or to continue CsA (n = 97). All patients were also given mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and oral steroids, planned to be discontinued at month 8. The primary endpoint, the clearance estimated according to Cockcroft and Gault at week 52, was significantly better in the SRL group (68.9 vs. 64.4 mL/min, p = 0.017). Patient and graft survival were not statistically different. The incidence of acute rejection episodes, mainly occurring after withdrawal of steroids, was numerically but not statistically higher in the SRL group (17% vs. 8%, p = 0.071). Sixteen patients discontinued SRL, mainly for adverse events (n = 11), and seven patients discontinued CsA for renal failure or acute rejection. Significantly, more patients in the SRL group reported aphthous, diarrhea, acne and high triglyceride levels. Conversion CsA to SRL 3 months after transplantation combined with MMF is associated with improvement in renal function.     

Randomized trial of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine 6 months after renal allograft transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In the first year after renal allograft transplantation, triple therapy immunosuppression with cyclosporin (CsA), prednisone (P), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is superior to a triple therapy treatment that includes azathioprine (AZA) instead of MMF. Whether long-term treatment with CsA-P-MMF is better than treatment with CsA-P-AZA is a matter of debate, as 3-year graft survival is similar in MMF- and AZA-treated patients. The purpose of the present study was to examine the short-term effect of changing MMF to AZA in low-risk renal allograft recipients 6 months after transplantation. METHOD: This was a randomized, open-label single-centre study, recruiting 48 low risk renal allograft recipients on CsA-P-MMF therapy 6 months after transplantation, comparing the outcome with continued MMF treatment (2 g b.i.d.) (group A, n=22) or switching MMF to AZA (1 mg/kg) treatment (group B, n=26). RESULTS: The outcome after a 6-months follow-up of patients in group A and group B was similar. Treatment failure rates (defined as clinically diagnosed acute rejection episodes) were 4.5% in group A and 3.8% in group B. There were no patient deaths and no graft failures during the 6-months observation period. Graft function was excellent and similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Replacing MMF with AZA 6 months after transplantation in low-risk renal allograft recipients is safe and is not associated with altered graft function in the short term.     

A pilot study on the safety and effectiveness of immunosuppression without prednisone after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids are commonly used in the immunosuppression therapy after liver transplantation, yet are associated with considerable side effects. Retrospective studies have shown that corticosteroids can be safely withdrawn from months to years after transplant. We prospectively investigated the effects of early immunosuppression without the use of corticosteroids on graft outcome and transplant complications. METHODS: Forty-five patients undergoing liver transplantation were randomized to receive immunosuppression composed of cyclosporine microemulsion and azathioprine with (n=22) or without prednisone (n=23), in conventional doses. In those patients who received prednisone, this was withdrawn within 3 months after transplant. The median follow-up of survivors was 14 months (range: 6-24). The study end points were to determine graft survival and function, infectious complications, including hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA levels in HCV-infected recipients, acute rejection, kidney function, and metabolic complications. RESULTS: Eleven deaths occurred, 6 of which were in the prednisone group. Two-year survival did not differ between patients treated with or without prednisone (70.2% vs. 78.3%, P=0.83), nor did the causes of death. No differences were observed with regard to graft function, renal function, and infectious complications. In the subset of patients who received transplants for HCV-related cirrhosis, the dynamics of virus replication HCV-RNA was faster among those treated with prednisone. The incidence and severity of acute rejection was similar in the two groups. More than 80% of acute rejections in both groups were classified as mild or moderate and underwent spontaneous resolution. Only two patients in each group had severe acute rejection requiring additional treatment with high-dose steroids. Patients receiving prednisone tended to have greater biochemical signs of cholestasis, higher serum cholesterol and glucose levels, and more frequent insulin requirement than those treated without corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation can be performed safely without using corticosteroids in the early postoperative course, and there is no need for routine aggressive steroid treatment of established acute rejections.     

The impact of mycophenolate mofetil dosing patterns on clinical outcome after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has proven to be a very effective drug for the prevention of acute rejection following renal transplantation when dosed as prescribed at 2 or 3 g/d. However, circumstances arise in clinical transplantation where the dose must be lowered, either to avoid drug toxicity or because of concurrent infection. The impact on the incidence of acute rejection and graft survival when the MMF dose must be lowered has not previously been investigated. METHODS: In this study, a cohort of 721 kidney transplant recipients who received immunosuppression using MMF in conjunction with cyclosporine and prednisone and OKT3 (n = 425) or Simulect (n = 296) induction were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were compared and contrasted between patients with and without MMF dose changes within the first year post-transplantation. RESULTS: The majority of patients (70.3%, n = 507) had at least one dose change within the first post-transplant year. Compared with the 214 patients who did not have a dose change, these patients had a much higher incidence of acute rejection within the first post-transplant year (23.3% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001). This resulted in a significantly decreased 3-yr death-censored graft survival (76.3% vs. 88.3%, p = 0.003). The incidence of acute rejection for patients who had a dose change was highest if the dose change occurred within the first post-transplant month (34.4%). The incidence of acute rejection for the dose change patients was influenced by recipient ethnicity (African-American vs. Caucasian) and the type of induction agent used (OKT3 vs. Simulect). CONCLUSION: Altering the dose of MMF within the first post-transplant year correlated with a significantly worse clinical outcome in this cohort of renal transplant recipients. These data suggest that avoidance of MMF dose changes within the first year after renal transplantation would result in improved graft survival.