速效胰岛素类似物与人型胰岛素持续皮下注射治疗糖尿病疗效观察

目的评价持续皮下输注(CSII)速效胰岛素类似物与人型普通胰岛素治疗糖尿病的疗效差异。方法86例糖尿病患者随机分两组:(1)胰岛素泵持续皮下输注人型普通胰岛素(No R)治疗组;(2)胰岛素泵连续皮下输注速效胰岛素类似物(In A)治疗组,治疗5~7 d后,比较两组血糖、体重变化及低血糖发生情况。结果两组治疗后血糖均能明显下降,空腹血糖下降两组间无明显差异,但In A组餐后血糖明显低于No R组〔(7.99±1.24)mmol/L vs(11.11±1.56)mmol/L,P<0.05〕;低血糖发生率显著低于No R组〔(0.36±0.31)次/人vs(0.98±0.29)次/人,P<0.01〕;In A组治疗前后体重没有明显变化〔(76.12±7.55)Kg vs(75.95±6.54)Kg,P>0.05〕,No R组治疗后体重明显增加〔(77.70±5.98)Kg vs(74.56±7.07)Kg,P<0.05〕。结论使用胰岛素泵持续皮下输注速效胰岛素类似物能更好的控制餐后高血糖,减少低血糖的发生,具有更高的安全性,且不增加体重,是控制糖尿病强化治疗的更好的选择。     

短期持续胰岛素皮下输注对不同病程2型糖尿病患者胰岛素抵抗的影响

目的探讨短期持续胰岛素皮下输注对不同病程2型糖尿病患者胰岛素抵抗的改善。方法随机选择72例2型糖尿病患者,按照病程不同分为2型糖尿病新诊断组(A组,22例,病程<3个月)、病程<5年组(B组,26例)、病程≤10年组(C组,24例)。患者均进行短期持续胰岛素皮下输注治疗,疗程为2周。治疗前后进行口服糖耐量试验,并测定负荷后30、120min血浆胰岛素和C肽水平,计算稳态模型胰岛素抵抗指数(Homa-IR)。结果与治疗前比较,治疗后A组口服糖耐量试验0、30、120min胰岛素和C肽水平均上升,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);B组口服糖耐量试验0、30min胰岛素及C肽水平均上升,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前后C组各时间点胰岛素、C肽水平的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后3组Homa-IR均较治疗前明显下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后Homa-IR水平为C组>B组>A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论短期持续胰岛素皮下输注能改善不同病程2型糖尿病患者的胰岛素抵抗,但改善程度随病程延长而下降。对2型糖尿病患者进行早期干预,有利于胰岛素功能改善。     

持续皮下胰岛素输注治疗初诊2型糖尿病的临床研究

目的探讨短期持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSⅡ)治疗初诊2型糖尿病(T2DM)对胰岛β细胞功能的改善和血糖的控制.方法对82例初诊T2DM进行2w CSⅡ治疗.分析比较其空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2h血糖(2h PG)、胰岛素抵抗指数(Homa A)、胰岛素分泌指数(Homa B)、静脉葡萄糖耐量试验(IVGTr)曲线下的胰岛素、C肽的面积.结果FPG、2h PG分别于治疗(3.5±1.5)d、(8.5±3.5)d后达到良好控制.胰岛素抵抗指数Ho眦A由治疗前的3.9±0.7降至1.9±0.5(P＜0.01),胰岛素分泌指数Homa B由治疗前的9.9±4.7增加至81.6±40.5(P＜0.01),胰岛素、C肽曲线下的面积均较治疗前明显提高.结论对有明显高血糖的初诊T2DM患者进行短期CSⅡ治疗可快速控制血糖和恢复胰岛β细胞功能的作用.     

持续皮下胰岛素输注强化治疗糖尿病高血糖的疗效观察

目的:分析持续皮下胰岛素输注强化治疗糖尿病高血糖的疗效.方法:本次56例研究对象均为我院2016年11月-2017年10月接收的糖尿病高血糖患者,采用随机平均法平均分为2组,各28例.给予对照组患者常规皮下多次胰岛素注射,给予观察组持续皮下胰岛素输注强化治疗,比较空腹和餐后2h血糖值和血糖变异系数的变化情况.结果:比较于治疗前,两组患者血糖值在空腹和餐后2h的变化情况均呈显著改善(P<0.05),但两组间比较并无显著差异性(P>0.05);而治疗后,观察组患者的血糖变异系数则显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:糖尿病患者在治疗过程中,接受持续皮下胰岛素输注强化治疗方式,虽然血糖控制效果和常规皮下多次胰岛素注射治疗相近,不过却可以减少血糖变异系数,安全性更好,可以做进一步推广和应用.     

甘精胰岛素联合速效胰岛素类似物短期强化治疗初诊2型糖尿病的疗效观察

目的观察胰岛素类似物短期强化治疗初诊2型糖尿病（T2DM）的疗效。方法将64例初诊2型糖尿病患者随机分为胰岛素类似物多次皮下注射组（MSII）和胰岛素泵组（CSII）各32例,连续治疗2周,分别于治疗前后测空腹血糖（FPG）、空腹胰岛素（FINS）、空服C肽（FC—P）及进食100g标准淀粉馒头后2h血糖（2hPG）、2h胰岛素（2bINS）、2hC肽（2hC—P）,并分别计算HOMA—IR、HOMA-,记录血糖达标时间、达标日胰岛素类似物用量、低血糖发生频率。结果治疗后两组FINS、FC—P、2hINs、2hC—P、HOMA-较治疗前明显升高（P〈0．01）,FPG、2hPG、HOMA—IR明显下降（P〈0．01）;两组间比较,治疗前和治疗后FINS、FC—P、2bINS、2hC—P、HOMA-、FPG、2hPG、HOMA—IR无统计学差异（P〉0．05）,低血糖发生频率无统计学差异（P〉0．05）,达标时间胰岛素泵组（2．46±0．78）d明显短于胰岛素类似物组（5．42±1．76）d（P〈0．05）,达标日胰岛素类似物用量胰岛素泵组（31．25±9．12）U／d,略少于胰岛素类似物皮下注射组（36．43±8．24）U／d,但无统计学差异（P〉0．05）。随访6月,两组患者在饮食运动治疗下,多数血糖均控制良好,需药物治疗的比例无明显差别。结论胰岛素类似物短期强化治疗初诊T2DM能明显改善胰岛B细胞功能,降低胰岛素抵抗,使多数血糖较高的初诊T2DM患者在长期不服药的情况下,血糖得到良好控制,可取得与胰岛素泵强化治疗相似的效果。     

持续皮下胰岛素输注和胰岛素每日多点注射治疗2型糖尿病的成本效果分析

目的 比较新人院的2型糖尿病患者使用持续皮下胰岛素输注(CS Ⅱ)和胰岛素每日多点注射(MDI)控制2型糖尿病血糖达标的成本效果.方法 回顾性分析86例使用CS Ⅱ方案和103例使用MDI方案控制血糖的新入院2型糖尿病患者,观察时间为2周.运用药物经济学中的成本效果分析法对两种治疗方案进行评价.结果 治疗2周后,CS Ⅱ组与MDI组患者血糖控制有效率相似,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);CS Ⅱ组低血糖反应发生率及夜间低血糖发生率较MDI组明显降低(P<0.05),其他不良反应发生率相似;CS Ⅱ方案成本(元/人)比MDI方案低(1478.34 vs.1620.46),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);成本效果比(C/E)显示CS Ⅱ组为15.07,MDI组为16.34,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);冉以成本较低的CS Ⅱ组方案为参照,增量的成本效果比(AC/AE)MDI组为129.20.结论 使用CS Ⅱ方案控制新人院2型糖尿病患者治疗的成本效益较MDI方案好,CS Ⅱ方案是住院期间胰岛素强化治疗的较优选择.     

持续皮下胰岛素输注和胰岛素每日多点注射治疗2型糖尿病的成本效果分析

Objective To observe the cost-effectiveness of using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CS Ⅱ) and multi-point daily insulin injections (MDI) in controlling blood sugar in the newly hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients. Methods Retrospective analysis on 86 cases taking CS Ⅱ and 103 cases using MDI on a 'blood sugar control program' among the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. The period for observation was 2 weeks, using cost-effectiveness analysis methods to evaluate the two treatment programs. Results After two weeks of treatment, the effectiveness in the control of blood sugar in CS Ⅱ group was similar to the MDI group, with no significant difference(P<0.05) and the adverse reactions were similar. Costs in the CS Ⅱ program (Yuan/person) was less than in the MDI program (1478.34 vs. 1620.46), with significant differences (P< 0.05). The cost-effectiveness ratios (C/E) were 15.07 in the CS Ⅱ group, and 16.34 in the MDI group, with no significant difference (P>0.05). In order to further reduce the cost of CS Ⅱ group as a reference, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (△C/ △E)ofthe MDI group was 129.20. Conclusion Costs-effective of the CS Ⅱ program was better than the MDI one in treating the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting that CS Ⅱ program might be a better choice for hospitals to carry on an intensive insulin therapy program.     

持续皮下胰岛素输注和胰岛素每日多点注射治疗2型糖尿病的成本效果分析

Objective To observe the cost-effectiveness of using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CS Ⅱ) and multi-point daily insulin injections (MDI) in controlling blood sugar in the newly hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients. Methods Retrospective analysis on 86 cases taking CS Ⅱ and 103 cases using MDI on a 'blood sugar control program' among the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. The period for observation was 2 weeks, using cost-effectiveness analysis methods to evaluate the two treatment programs. Results After two weeks of treatment, the effectiveness in the control of blood sugar in CS Ⅱ group was similar to the MDI group, with no significant difference(P<0.05) and the adverse reactions were similar. Costs in the CS Ⅱ program (Yuan/person) was less than in the MDI program (1478.34 vs. 1620.46), with significant differences (P< 0.05). The cost-effectiveness ratios (C/E) were 15.07 in the CS Ⅱ group, and 16.34 in the MDI group, with no significant difference (P>0.05). In order to further reduce the cost of CS Ⅱ group as a reference, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (△C/ △E)ofthe MDI group was 129.20. Conclusion Costs-effective of the CS Ⅱ program was better than the MDI one in treating the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting that CS Ⅱ program might be a better choice for hospitals to carry on an intensive insulin therapy program.     

持续皮下胰岛素输注和胰岛素每日多点注射治疗2型糖尿病的成本效果分析

Objective To observe the cost-effectiveness of using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CS Ⅱ) and multi-point daily insulin injections (MDI) in controlling blood sugar in the newly hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients. Methods Retrospective analysis on 86 cases taking CS Ⅱ and 103 cases using MDI on a 'blood sugar control program' among the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. The period for observation was 2 weeks, using cost-effectiveness analysis methods to evaluate the two treatment programs. Results After two weeks of treatment, the effectiveness in the control of blood sugar in CS Ⅱ group was similar to the MDI group, with no significant difference(P<0.05) and the adverse reactions were similar. Costs in the CS Ⅱ program (Yuan/person) was less than in the MDI program (1478.34 vs. 1620.46), with significant differences (P< 0.05). The cost-effectiveness ratios (C/E) were 15.07 in the CS Ⅱ group, and 16.34 in the MDI group, with no significant difference (P>0.05). In order to further reduce the cost of CS Ⅱ group as a reference, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (△C/ △E)ofthe MDI group was 129.20. Conclusion Costs-effective of the CS Ⅱ program was better than the MDI one in treating the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting that CS Ⅱ program might be a better choice for hospitals to carry on an intensive insulin therapy program.     

持续皮下胰岛素输注和胰岛素每日多点注射治疗2型糖尿病的成本效果分析

Objective To observe the cost-effectiveness of using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CS Ⅱ) and multi-point daily insulin injections (MDI) in controlling blood sugar in the newly hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients. Methods Retrospective analysis on 86 cases taking CS Ⅱ and 103 cases using MDI on a 'blood sugar control program' among the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. The period for observation was 2 weeks, using cost-effectiveness analysis methods to evaluate the two treatment programs. Results After two weeks of treatment, the effectiveness in the control of blood sugar in CS Ⅱ group was similar to the MDI group, with no significant difference(P<0.05) and the adverse reactions were similar. Costs in the CS Ⅱ program (Yuan/person) was less than in the MDI program (1478.34 vs. 1620.46), with significant differences (P< 0.05). The cost-effectiveness ratios (C/E) were 15.07 in the CS Ⅱ group, and 16.34 in the MDI group, with no significant difference (P>0.05). In order to further reduce the cost of CS Ⅱ group as a reference, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (△C/ △E)ofthe MDI group was 129.20. Conclusion Costs-effective of the CS Ⅱ program was better than the MDI one in treating the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting that CS Ⅱ program might be a better choice for hospitals to carry on an intensive insulin therapy program.     

持续皮下胰岛素输注治疗妊娠期糖尿病的效果观察

目的 分析持续皮下胰岛素输注对妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)患者血糖水平及妊娠结局的影响.方法 以2018年8月—2019年8月本院收治的GDM患者120例为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组和治疗组,各60例,对照组给予常规胰岛素皮下注射治疗,治疗组给予持续皮下胰岛素输注.比较两组患者治疗前后空腹血糖(FBG)、糖化血...     

胰岛素泵治疗2型糖尿病高血糖状态的疗效分析

目的总结并分析采用连续皮下胰岛素输注方法强化治疗2型糖尿病高血糖状态的疗效以及剂量。方法216例血糖控制差的住院2型糖尿病患者,给予胰岛素泵强化治疗,疗程8d,不合用其他口服降糖药,观察达到满意血糖控制（FPG〈7mmol／L,2hPG〈10mmol／L）的天数以及胰岛素泵的基础量和餐前大剂量,并分析与上述指标相关的因素。结果血糖达满意控制的平均天数为（5．4±1．8）d,日基础量为（0．23±0．07）U／kg,早餐前大剂量为（0．12±0．05）U／kg,午餐前大剂量为（0．14±0．06）U／kg,晚餐前大剂量为（0．14±0．06）U／kg,在血糖满意控制后,胰岛素用量显著减少。发生低血糖症（0．04±0．21）次／人,生化低血糖（0．07±0．25）次／人,低血糖反应（0．96±1．18）次／人。结论经过胰岛素泵的强化治疗,T2DM的高血糖状态可在5—6d得以纠正。经多元回归分析,影响达目标血糖时间的因素为FPG和年龄,影响胰岛素用量的因素为糖尿病的病程、治疗前FPG和2hPG。     

Effects of alpha-tocopherol supplementation and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion on oxidative stress in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND: Most Koreans with type 2 diabetes are insulin deficient and insulin resistant. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) provides a suitable amount of insulin to overcome insulin deficiency and achieve near-normal blood glucose concentrations. Our previous study showed, however, that CSII does not reduce oxidative stress even though it normalizes blood glucose concentrations. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether CSII plus alpha-tocopherol supplementation for 2 mo would alter oxidative stress in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: Ninety-eight subjects received CSII plus either 200 mg alpha-tocopherol/d (n = 48) or a placebo (n = 50) for 2 mo. The general characteristics (age, duration of diabetes, body mass index, and blood glucose concentrations) of the 2 groups were not significantly different. RESULTS: Fasting and postprandial blood glucose concentrations of all subjects were normalized after CSII. Fasting plasma insulin concentrations did not differ significantly between the 2 groups after CSII. Lipid peroxide concentrations in plasma and red blood cells decreased and alpha-tocopherol concentrations in plasma and red blood cells increased after alpha-tocopherol supplementation. However, these changes were not affected significantly by CSII. Plasma vitamin C concentrations increased significantly after CSII plus alpha-tocopherol supplementation. However, the activities of antioxidant enzymes in red blood cells did not change significantly after CSII plus alpha-tocopherol supplementation. CONCLUSION: alpha-Tocopherol supplementation was beneficial in decreasing blood lipid peroxide concentrations without altering antioxidant enzyme activities in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes treated with CSII.     

持续皮下胰岛素输注和胰岛素每日多点注射治疗2型糖尿病的成本效果分析

Objective To observe the cost-effectiveness of using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CS Ⅱ) and multi-point daily insulin injections (MDI) in controlling blood sugar in the newly hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients. Methods Retrospective analysis on 86 cases taking CS Ⅱ and 103 cases using MDI on a 'blood sugar control program' among the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. The period for observation was 2 weeks, using cost-effectiveness analysis methods to evaluate the two treatment programs. Results After two weeks of treatment, the effectiveness in the control of blood sugar in CS Ⅱ group was similar to the MDI group, with no significant difference(P<0.05) and the adverse reactions were similar. Costs in the CS Ⅱ program (Yuan/person) was less than in the MDI program (1478.34 vs. 1620.46), with significant differences (P< 0.05). The cost-effectiveness ratios (C/E) were 15.07 in the CS Ⅱ group, and 16.34 in the MDI group, with no significant difference (P>0.05). In order to further reduce the cost of CS Ⅱ group as a reference, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (△C/ △E)ofthe MDI group was 129.20. Conclusion Costs-effective of the CS Ⅱ program was better than the MDI one in treating the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting that CS Ⅱ program might be a better choice for hospitals to carry on an intensive insulin therapy program.     

持续皮下胰岛素输注和胰岛素每日多点注射治疗2型糖尿病的成本效果分析

Objective To observe the cost-effectiveness of using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CS Ⅱ) and multi-point daily insulin injections (MDI) in controlling blood sugar in the newly hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients. Methods Retrospective analysis on 86 cases taking CS Ⅱ and 103 cases using MDI on a 'blood sugar control program' among the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. The period for observation was 2 weeks, using cost-effectiveness analysis methods to evaluate the two treatment programs. Results After two weeks of treatment, the effectiveness in the control of blood sugar in CS Ⅱ group was similar to the MDI group, with no significant difference(P<0.05) and the adverse reactions were similar. Costs in the CS Ⅱ program (Yuan/person) was less than in the MDI program (1478.34 vs. 1620.46), with significant differences (P< 0.05). The cost-effectiveness ratios (C/E) were 15.07 in the CS Ⅱ group, and 16.34 in the MDI group, with no significant difference (P>0.05). In order to further reduce the cost of CS Ⅱ group as a reference, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (△C/ △E)ofthe MDI group was 129.20. Conclusion Costs-effective of the CS Ⅱ program was better than the MDI one in treating the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting that CS Ⅱ program might be a better choice for hospitals to carry on an intensive insulin therapy program.     

持续皮下胰岛素输注和胰岛素每日多点注射治疗2型糖尿病的成本效果分析

Objective To observe the cost-effectiveness of using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CS Ⅱ) and multi-point daily insulin injections (MDI) in controlling blood sugar in the newly hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients. Methods Retrospective analysis on 86 cases taking CS Ⅱ and 103 cases using MDI on a 'blood sugar control program' among the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. The period for observation was 2 weeks, using cost-effectiveness analysis methods to evaluate the two treatment programs. Results After two weeks of treatment, the effectiveness in the control of blood sugar in CS Ⅱ group was similar to the MDI group, with no significant difference(P<0.05) and the adverse reactions were similar. Costs in the CS Ⅱ program (Yuan/person) was less than in the MDI program (1478.34 vs. 1620.46), with significant differences (P< 0.05). The cost-effectiveness ratios (C/E) were 15.07 in the CS Ⅱ group, and 16.34 in the MDI group, with no significant difference (P>0.05). In order to further reduce the cost of CS Ⅱ group as a reference, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (△C/ △E)ofthe MDI group was 129.20. Conclusion Costs-effective of the CS Ⅱ program was better than the MDI one in treating the newly hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting that CS Ⅱ program might be a better choice for hospitals to carry on an intensive insulin therapy program.