Therapeutic ratio of inhaled corticosteroids in adult asthma. A dose-range comparison between fluticasone propionate and budesonide, measuring their effect on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and adrenal cortex function

Inhaled corticosteroids have become the mainstay treatment of bronchial asthma. However, simultaneous evaluations of efficacy and side effects are few. This study aimed to compare the relative effect of fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide (BUD) on bronchial responsiveness and endogenous cortisol secretion in adults with asthma. The study was double-blind and included 66 adults with asthma, who were randomized to FP (n = 33) or BUD (n = 33). Prestudy, all participants were clinically stable, using inhaled corticosteroids and hyperresponsive to methacholine. Eligible patients were randomized to three consecutive 2-wk periods with either FP 250 microg twice daily, FP 500 microg twice daily, and FP 1,000 microg twice daily, or BUD 400 microg twice daily, BUD 800 microg twice daily, and BUD 1,600 microg twice daily, delivered by Diskhaler and Turbuhaler, respectively. Before randomization and at the end of each treatment, bronchial methacholine PD(20), 24-h urinary cortisol excretion (24-h UC), plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and blood eosinophils were determined. The relative PD(20) potency between FP and BUD was 2.51 (95% CI, 1.05-5.99; p < 0. 05), while the relative 24-h UC potency was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.44-0.83; p < 0.01). The differential therapeutic ratio (FP/BUD) based on PD(20) potency and 24-h UC was 4.18 (95% CI, 1.16-15.03; p < 0.05). The difference in systemic potency was also seen for plasma cortisol, serum osteocalcin, and blood eosinophils. Therapeutic ratio over a wide dose range, determined by impact on bronchial responsiveness and endogenous corticosteroid production, seems to favor FP.     

Lung deposition and systemic availability of fluticasone Diskus and budesonide Turbuhaler in children

Pharmacokinetic studies can be used to measure lung dose of inhaled drugs. The aim of this study was to compare the lung deposition of budesonide (BUD) inhaled from Turbuhaler (AstraZeneca, Lund, Sweden) and fluticasone propionate (FP) inhaled from Diskus (GlaxoSmithKline, London, UK) and to assess if the study design used for pharmacokinetic studies can be simplified. Plasma levels of BUD and FP were measured for 21 hours on five separate days in 15 patients aged 8 to 14 years: (1) Intravenous infusion of 200 microg BUD, (2) intravenous infusion of 200 microg fluticasone dipropionate, (3) inhalation of 800 microg BUD via Turbuhaler, (4) inhalation of 750 microg FP via Diskus, and (5) inhalation of BUD and FP on the same day. Charcoal was ingested to eliminate drug uptake from the gastrointestinal tract. The mean lung deposition of drug after Turbuhaler and Diskus inhalation was 30.8 and 8.0% when BUD and fluticasone were administered on separate days and 29.5% (BUD) and 7.6% (fluticasone) when the two drugs were inhaled on the same day. Lung deposition is four times higher in children after inhalation from Turbuhaler than after inhalation from Diskus. Pharmacokinetic studies with BUD and FP can be simplified because the two treatments can be administered on the same day.     

The effect of high-dose fluticasone propionate and budesonide on lung function and asthma exacerbations in patients with severe asthma.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the comparative efficacy and safety of equal doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) and inhaled budesonide (BUD) using their respective dry powder inhalers in a population of severe asthmatics requiring high doses of inhaled corticosteroid. This double-blind double-dummy parallel-group study compared the effects of 24 weeks of treatment with FP (2000 micrograms daily via a Diskhaler inhaler; Glaxo Wellcome, Evreux, France) and BUD (2000 micrograms daily via a Turbuhaler inhaler; Astra Pharmaceuticals, Rijswijka, Netherlands) on lung function and asthma exacerbations in 395 patients with asthma. FP was statistically significantly superior to BUD with respect to the percentage of symptom-free days (P = 0.02), the incidence of days free from rescue bronchodilator usage (P = 0.02) and the distribution of change in peak expiratory flow (PEF) expressed as a percentage of the predicted PEF (P = 0.04). During the treatment period FP was statistically significantly superior to BUD for change in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) at 8, 16 and 24 weeks, change in the median daytime symptom score during weeks 5-16, for incidence of symptom-free days and incidence of days free from rescue bronchodilator usage during weeks 17-24. There was no significant difference between FP and BUD with respect to the number of patients experiencing one or more asthma exacerbation (33.8 and 28.4% of patients, respectively). There was, however, evidence that the exacerbations were clinically less severe in patients treated with FP, in that the time to resolution was quicker (11.0 vs. 14.7 days; P = 0.035), mean duration of all exacerbations (for an individual patient) tended to be shorter (18.5 vs. 23.6 days; P = 0.12), the time off work was reduced (4.2 vs. 7.6 days; P = 0.012) and the lowest PEF recorded during the exacerbation was higher (301 vs. 263 l min-1; P = 0.07). There were no clinically relevant differences in the safety (serum cortisol levels, markers of bone turnover, adverse events) of FP and BUD at these microgram equivalent doses. The patients recruited into this study, in retrospect, probably had no need for such high doses of inhaled corticosteroid but, irrespective of this, FP at microgram equivalent doses showed evidence of superior efficacy to BUD with respect to lung function and severity of asthma exacerbations without producing any greater adverse systemic effect.     

沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松干粉与布地奈德干粉吸入治疗成人支气管哮喘的临床疗效和安全性对照研究

目的比较低剂量的沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松干粉剂(SM/FP)与中等剂量的布地奈德干粉(BUD)吸入治疗成年轻、中度支气管哮喘(简称哮喘)患者的临床疗效和安全性。方法采用多中心、随机、开放、平行对照试验,389例18～70岁哮喘患者按随机数字表法分为试验组[199例,吸入SM/FP1泡/次(每泡SM50μg、FP100μg),每天2次]和对照组(193例,吸入BUD,每次400μg,每天2次)。结果试验组和对照组患者晨间呼气峰流速(PEFam)在治疗的第1周末较基线值分别提高(26±2)L/min和(7±5)L/min(P均<0.01);6周后两组的改善分别为(54±6)L/min和(31±8)L/min(P均<0.01);治疗期间试验组每周均改善更明显;晚间呼气峰流速(PEFpm)与PEFam结果相似;日间和夜间症状评分在试验组和对照组治疗第1周比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);6周时试验组下降的程度与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);全天无症状天数的百分数试验组由治疗前的6.9%增加至治疗后的55.2%,对照组则由8.4%增加至36.1%。沙丁胺醇气雾剂的揿数在两组分别由治疗前的(3.32±3.15)揿和(3.21±3.23)揿下降至治疗结束时的(1.06±1.79)揿和(2.03±3.17)揿,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),试验组的用药揿数显著少于对照组;无需沙丁胺醇的天数试验组与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0     

Potency ratio fluticasone propionate (Flixotide Diskus)/budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler)

In the choice of, or switch between, various inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) it is important to know equipotent doses for clinical treatment effects of the alternatives. Various ICS do have different inherent potency. Further, the ICS are delivered from inhalers that may differ markedly in output characteristics and drug delivery to intrapulmonary airways. Therefore, clinical efficacy comparisons must include drug-inhaler comparisons. We estimated the therapeutic potency ratio of the Flixotide Diskus (fluticasone propionate, FP) and the Pulmicort Turbuhaler (budesonide, BUD) in steroid-naive asthma patients, using a dose-reduction technique (FP 500-0 mcg/day, BUD 800-0 mcg/day). The dose defining end point was loss of asthma control in this paper denoted as exacerbation. In total, 282 patients with proven asthma were enrolled in the study, and 103 in the FP group and 98 in the BUD group completed the study per protocol. In total, 80 patients in the FP-group and 79 in the BUD-group experienced a dose defining exacerbation. The exacerbation frequency increased in a dose-dependent way as the dose was titrated down. From these data the potency difference between the present drug inhaler combinations, Flixotide Diskus and Pulmicort Turbuhaler, was calculated to be between 1.50:1 (95% CI 1.10:1-2.05:1) and 1.75:1 (CI 1.26:1-2.43:1) depending on if patients with insufficient steroid-response were excluded from the calculations or not. In these steroid-na?ve patients, the potency difference was evident only at low daily doses, below 200 mcg.     

The effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate in the treatment of young asthmatic children: a dose comparison study.

The response in asthmatic young children to inhaled steroids within the usual pediatric dose range is unknown. We therefore evaluated the dose-related response in young children with moderate asthma to inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) (delivered via the Babyhaler spacer device) within the pediatric dose range. A total of 237 children (mean age 28 mo, range 12 to 47) with moderate asthmatic symptoms were studied in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study of 12 wk treatment following a 4-wk run-in period. The median use of rescue medication was 1 dose in 2 d during the run-in period. FP 50 micrograms twice daily (FP100) and 100 micrograms twice daily (FP200) was compared with placebo inhaled from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) and the Babyhaler spacer device. With FP200 there was a statistically significant improvement from baseline, as compared with the placebo group, in 8 of 10 diary card parameters, including the three symptom domains of wheeze, cough, and breathlessness, and use of rescue medication. FP100 produced a significant reduction in 5 of these 10 parameters, whereas no significant differences were found between the FP200 and FP100. The numbers of patients with at least one exacerbation during treatment with placebo, FP100, and FP200 were 37%, 26%, and 20%, respectively. This difference between placebo and FP200, as well as the dose-related order was significant (p < 0.05). Both FP doses were as well tolerated as placebo over the 12 wk treatment with a similar incidence of adverse effects. Asthmatic symptoms in 1- to 3-yr-old children responded in a significant and dose-related manner to treatment with FP within a pediatric dose range.     

Assessment of the systemic effects of budesonide inhaled from Easyhaler and from Turbuhaler in healthy male volunteers.

The main objective of this study was to show dose-dependent equivalence in the systemic activity of budesonide 800 microg day(-1) and 1600 microg day(-1) delivered from either Easyhaler or Turbuhaler in healthy male subjects. This single-centre study was carried out according to a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, five-way crossover design over a 9-week period. All subjects received 1 week of treatment with the following, in randomized order, with a washout week between each treatment: budesonide Easyhaler 800 microg day(-1) plus placebo Turbuhaler; budesonide Easyhaler 1600 microg day(-1) plus placebo Turbuhaler; placebo Easyhaler plus Pulmicort Turbuhaler 800 microg day(-1); placebo Easyhaler plus Pulmicort Turbuhaler 1600 microg day(-1); placebo Easyhaler plus placebo Turbuhaler. The final inhalation of study drug was performed at the study centre, where blood and urine samples were collected. Fifteen subjects were recruited and all completed the study. Mean serum cortisol AUC0-20 values (the primary outcome variable) were comparable for each device at the two dose levels, and met the defined criteria for equivalence (90% CI 0.8-1.25 for between-treatment difference). Budesonide 800 microg day(-1) caused minimal suppression of serum cortisol AUC0-20 values, Budesonide 1600 microg day(-1) statistically significantly suppressed serum cortisol AUC0-20 values compared with placebo. Mean morning serum cortisol values were within the reference range in al treatment groups. At a budesonide dose of 800 microg day(-1) mean urine cortisol/creatinine ratio was statistically significantly higher with Easyhaler than with Turbuhaler, but there was no significant difference between the devices at the 1600 microg day(-1) dose. Serum budesonide concentrations were equivalent for each device at both dose levels. Adverse drug reactions were infrequent and mild in nature and there were no clinically significant changes in laboratory safety variables. In conclusion, in healthy male volunteers, budesonide 800 microg day(-1) and 1600 microg day inhaled from Easyhaler had comparable systemic effects to the same doses inhaled via Turbuhaler.     

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler to budesonide Turbuhaler.

Mometasone furoate (MF) administered by dry powder inhaler (DPI) was composed with budesonide (BUD) Turbuhaler in the treatment of moderate persistent asthma. The patients were randomized to one of four treatment groups: MF DPI (100, 200, 400 microg b.i.d) or BUD Turbuhaler. 400 microg b.i.d in a 12-week, active-controlled, evaluator-blind, multicentre international trial. The primary efficacy variable was the mean change from baseline to endpoint (last treatment visit) in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). Changes in FEV1 showed a statistically significant superiority (p<0.05) of MF DPI 200 and 400 microg b.i.d compared with the BUD Turbuhaler 400 microg b.i.d treatment. Significant superiority (p<0.05) was also seen in scores for several secondary efficacy variables when MF DPI was compared with BUD Turbuhaler treatment. MF DPI 200 microg b.i.d was comparable to MF DPI 400 microg b.i.d in therapeutic benefit. The incidence of oral candidiasis was no more than 3% in any group. All treatments were well tolerated. A total daily dose of 400 microg of mometasone furoate administered by dry powder inhaler provides a well-tolerated treatment for patients with moderate persistent asthma and results in a significantly greater improvement, when compared to a daily dose of 800 microg BUD Turbuhaler in the parameters measured in this study.     

Addition of inhaled salmeterol to inhaled corticosteroids in patients with poorly controlled nocturnal asthma

The effect of adding inhaled salmeterol to inhaled corticosteroids was studied in patients with poorly controlled nocturnal asthma. In a double-blind, cross-over study, 20 patients were randomized to receive either salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily or placebo via a Diskhaler after a 1-week run-in period. After 4 weeks of treatment, patients were subsequently crossed over to receive the other treatment for a further 4 weeks with a 2-week wash-out period in between. The response to treatment was assessed by peak expiratory flow rates (PEF) measured in the morning and evening, symptom scores of asthma, number of bronchodilators used, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) at regular intervals. Patients' preference for the Diskhaler or metered-dose inhaler was assessed at the last visit. The results showed that morning PEF was significantly higher while on salmeterol than on placebo (296.9 +/- 70.2 vs 274.6 +/- 77.4 L/min). Evening PEF showed a trend towards a higher value while on salmeterol than on placebo (321.1 +/- 73.4 vs 288.7 +/- 79.4 L/min), but the difference was not significant. There was no statistically significant improvement in symptom scores, number of rescue bronchodilators used and FEV1 or FVC between the two treatment groups. The occurrence of side effects in terms of tremors and palpitations between treatment and placebo were similar. There were more patients who preferred Diskhaler to metered-dose inhaler (70% vs 30%). We conclude that salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily produces significant improvement in morning PEF and is well tolerated in patients with nocturnal asthma. Diskhaler is a device which is easy to use and preferred to a metered-dose inhaler.     

A double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-response study with budesonide Turbuhaler in Japanese asthma patients. Japanese Pulmicort Turbuhaler study group

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the dose-response for inhaled budesonide via Turbuhaler in Japanese patients with mild to moderate asthma. METHODOLOGY: Inhaled budesonide 100 microg, 200 microg, 400 microg or placebo was administered twice daily via Turbuhaler for 6 weeks, to 267 adult Japanese patients (mean age 51 years) with mild-to-moderate, non-steroid-dependent bronchial asthma, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel group study. The patients had to be symptomatic for more than 3 days/week and have an average morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) 50-80% of predicted normal value. RESULTS: The response to budesonide was rapid, all treatments showing a significant improvement in morning PEF after 1 week (P<0.05). During week 6, mean improvements of 15, 45, 53 and 71 L/min were observed for the placebo, 200 microg, 400 microg and 800 microg budesonide groups, respectively. Compared with placebo all improvements in the budesonide groups were statistically significant and a significant dose-response was demonstrated (P<0.001). The difference between the 200 microg and 800 microg doses was significant. Also, for several secondary efficacy variables (e.g. evening PEF, symptom score, treatment score, daily activity score and sleep score) significant dose-responses were shown. Other variables included the investigators' assessments of improvement and usefulness. They also showed statistically significant dose-response relationships and confirmed the rapid onset of action. Budesonide was well tolerated at all tested doses, with a low incidence of adverse events, all of which were minor in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide Turbuhaler in the doses 100 microg to 400 microg twice daily was effective, well tolerated and showed a rapid onset of action in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. Dose-response was demonstrated for several variables of clinical efficacy.     

Comparison of hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate Autohaler with budesonide Turbuhaler in asthma control.

BACKGROUND: Hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate Autohaler (HFA-BDP AH) is a breath-actuated chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free metered dose inhaler in which BDP is in a solution of HFA propellant. Budesonide Turbuhaler (BUD TH) is a breath-dependent dry powder inhaler. OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that half the daily dose of HFA-BDP AH would provide an equivalent control of asthma symptoms to the BUD TH. METHODS: This was an 8-week open study in patients with symptomatic moderate-to-severe asthma, previously on BUD 500-1,000 microg x day(-1), or an equivalent. After 5-14 days' run-in, patients were randomized to HFA-BDP AH 800 microg x day(-1) or BUD TH 1,600 microg x day(-1). The intent-to-treat population consisted of 111 patients on HFA-BDP AH and 98 patients on BUD TH. RESULTS: Mean change from baseline in PEF in the morning (AM PEF) at week 8 was 23.95 liters x min(-1) for HFA-BDP AH and 24.46 liters x min(-1) for BUD TH. A two-sided equivalence test using the 0.51 liter x min(-1) difference gave 95% confidence intervals within a defined equivalence interval of (-infinity, 25 liters x min(-1)) indicating that the mean change in AM PEF was equivalent for the two groups. There were no significant differences in the mean change from baseline in FEV1 or beta-agonist use. Patients using HFA-BDP AH had a significantly greater mean change from baseline in the percentage of days free from shortness of breath (p = 0.05), chest tightness (p = 0.02) and nights without sleep disturbance (p = 0.04) at week 3, and wheeze (p = 0.01), shortness of breath (p = 0.02), chest tightness (p < 0.01) and daily asthma symptoms (p = 0.03) at week 8. The incidence, type and severity of adverse events were similar in each group. At week 8, the mean change from baseline in corrected urine cortisol/creatinine ratio in a subgroup of patients was -0.36 for HFA-BDP and -4.88 for BUD TH (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: HFA-BDP 800 microg x day(-1) provided control of moderate-to-severe asthma with efficacy and safety at least similar to BUD TH 1,600 microg x day(-1).     

Dose-related effect of beclomethasone dipropionate on airway responsiveness in asthma

The effects of twice daily inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) at two dose levels (500 and 1,000 micrograms daily) on the airway responsiveness to inhaled histamine was evaluated by a randomized, single-blind, cross-over study in 10 patients with stable asthma. The 12-week study began with a 3-week run-in period of baseline treatment, which was continued unchanged throughout the study, and the two treatment periods were separated by a 3-week placebo period. Patients attended the laboratory every 3 weeks for spirometry and histamine inhalation tests to determine the provocative concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (PC20 of FEV1). There was a similar significant improvement (p less than 0.05) in mean FEV1 after both treatments. There was no significant change in PC20 after treatment with 500 micrograms daily, the geometric mean being 0.587 mg/ml after the placebo period and 0.860 mg/ml after BDP treatment. There was a significant improvement in PC20 (1.930 mg/ml) after treatment with 1,000 micrograms BDP daily in comparison with the placebo and treatment periods with 500 micrograms BDP daily (p less than 0.001). These results suggest that higher doses than usual of inhaled BDP must be used to control airway responsiveness in asthmatics.     

Efficacy of once- and twice-daily administration of budesonide via Turbuhaler as initial therapy in patients with mild persistent asthma.

Inhaled glucocorticosteroids such as budesonide have an important role in the management of asthma. Although these agents have traditionally been given twice daily, evidence is accumulating that once-daily treatment may be as effective as twice-daily administration. The efficacy of budesonide Turbuhaler (Astra, Lund, Sweden), 400 micrograms once daily in the evening or 200 micrograms twice daily, was compared in a randomized, double-blind study involving 181 patients (75 men, 106 women; mean age 30.8 years) with mild asthma [mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 92.8% pred.] who had not previously been treated with inhaled glucocorticosteroids. After a 2-week run-in period, patients were randomized to either regimen and treated for 6 weeks. This was followed by two 8-week open treatment periods, during which all patients received budesonide Turbuhaler, 200 micrograms once daily during the first period and 100 micrograms once daily during the second period. The mean change in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) during the double-blind treatment period was 16.9 l min-1 in patients receiving once-daily treatment and 17.2 l min-1 in those receiving twice-daily treatment. Similarly, there were no significant differences in evening PEF, symptom scores, bronchodilator use or spirometry data between patients receiving once- and twice-daily treatments. The improvements in morning PEF, symptom scores and bronchodilator use seen during the double-blind treatment period were maintained during the two open treatment periods. It is concluded that once-daily treatment with budesonide Turbuhaler is as effective as an initial therapy twice-daily treatment in patients with mild persistent asthma and that the initial dose can be reduced to maintenance levels (including 100 micrograms) without loss of asthma control.     

The effect of inhaled corticosteroids on the maximal degree of airway narrowing to methacholine in asthmatic subjects

Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma is characterized by an increase in sensitivity and in maximal response to airway-narrowing stimuli. Long-term therapy with inhaled corticosteroids is known to reduce airway hypersensitivity in asthmatic patients. To investigate whether these drugs also reduce the maximal degree of airway narrowing we studied the effects of inhaled budesonide on the maximal response plateau of the dose-response curve to inhaled methacholine in mildly asthmatic patients in whom a raised plateau could be measured. Sixteen atopic patients with mild asthma were placed randomly into two parallel treatment groups to receive double-blindly either budesonide (400 micrograms twice daily) or placebo, inhaled via a Turbuhaler, for 4 wk. Before treatment, after 2 and 4 wk of treatment, and after 2 and 4 wk of wash-out, complete dose-response curves to methacholine were obtained using a standardized 2-min tidal breathing method. The response was measured by FEV1, expressed in % fall from baseline. A plateau on the log dose-response curve was considered if three or more data points fell within a 5% response range. The maximal response was obtained by averaging the values on the plateau (MFEV1), and the sensitivity was calculated from the provocative concentration of methacholine, causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20). After 4 wk of budesonide treatment, mean MFEV1 decreased from 41.6 to 33.7% fall (p = 0.0004). The changes in MFEV1 were significantly different between placebo and budesonide (p = 0.03). The geometric mean PC20 increased from 3.4 to 6.3 mg/ml (p = 0.02), but the changes in PC20 were not different between the two groups (p = 0.23).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of disease duration on dose-response of inhaled budesonide in asthma

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) represent first-line treatment in persistent asthma with clinical studies showing benefits of initiating therapy early. Whether treatment should be started with a high or low dose remains controversial. We investigated the importance of disease duration on the response to the starting dose of the ICS, budesonide, in asthma patients not previously treated with ICS. METHODS: Forty patients with newly detected asthma (symptoms for <12 months) and 41 patients with established asthma (mean duration 5.2 years, range 2-11) were randomized (double-blind, parallel-group) to treatment with budesonide Turbuhaler 100 or 400microg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks. RESULTS: For morning peak expiratory flow (mPEF), all four budesonide treatments resulted in statistically significant improvements from baseline and, after 12 weeks, the changes in all four groups were statistically significantly greater than placebo. In patients receiving early treatment, no significant differences were seen between budesonide doses. In patients with established symptoms, 800microg/day improved mPEF significantly more than 200microg/day. The 800microg/day dose in the early treatment group improved mPEF significantly more than in the delayed treatment group. Changes in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1), the concentration of inhaled histamine causing a 20% drop in FEV1, and use of as-needed medication behaved in very similar ways to mPEF. Asthma symptoms were reduced in all budesonide groups without a difference between doses. CONCLUSION: In patients with newly detected asthma treated early the initial ICS dose is not important. In contrast, in patients with symptoms for a longer duration a high starting dose improves airway function and hyperresponsiveness significantly better than a low dose.     

Improved safety with equivalent asthma control in adults with chronic severe asthma on high-dose fluticasone propionate

OBJECTIVE: High-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have been associated with the same side-effects as oral corticosteroids. Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide (BUD) in doses greater than 2000 microg/day are used regularly in severe asthma, despite the fact that safety and efficacy data at such high doses are limited. Fluticasone propionate (FP) has been promoted as being twice as potent clinically as BDP or BUD at doses of 2000 microg/day or less with a similar safety profile. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of FP with BDP and BUD in 133 symptomatic adult asthmatics requiring at least 1750 microg/day of BDP or BUD. METHODOLOGY: Patients fulfilling the entry criteria were randomized to receive either their regular ICS medication or FP at approximately half the microgram dose for 6 months in an open, parallel group study. The primary efficacy measure was based on morning peak expiratory flow measurements recorded by patients on daily record cards, while determination of safety was based on a number of endpoints including changes in bone turnover indices, the incidence of topical side-effects and assessments of quality of life. RESULTS: It was shown that patients who were switched to FP, but not those continuing with BDP or BUD, had significant increases in levels of morning serum cortisol and the urine cortisol:creatinine ratio while maintaining asthma control. Serum osteocalcin and the pyridinoline:creatinine ratio, as well as the deoxypyridinoline:creatinine ratio, were also shown to increase only in the FP group. Subjective assessments such as quality of life score, the incidence and ease of bruising, and reports of hoarseness also favoured the FP group. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that, at the doses studied and with the delivery devices used clinically, FP is at least as effective as BDP/BUD in the management of severe asthma and may offer clinical advantages with respect to steroid-related adverse effects.     

A dose-dependent effect of the novel inhaled corticosteroid ciclesonide on airway responsiveness to adenosine-5'-monophosphate in asthmatic patients.

Inhaled corticosteroids decrease airway responsiveness in asthma partly through suppression of airway inflammation. We have previously demonstrated that inhaled budesonide reduced airway responsiveness to the mast cell stimulus adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP) to a threefold greater extent than to methacholine and sodium metabisulfite, suggesting that AMP responsiveness may be a more sensitive marker of airway inflammation and steroid action in order to assess a dose-response relationship. To investigate this, we studied the effects of three doses of the novel corticosteroid ciclesonide (50 micrograms, 200 micrograms, and 800 micrograms) inhaled as a dry powder twice daily on airway responsiveness to AMP and inflammatory parameters in induced sputum. In a three-parallel-dose group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study, with a washout period of 3 to 8 wk, a total of 29 patients with mild to moderate allergic asthma underwent AMP challenge and sputum induction before and after 14 d of treatment with ciclesonide or matched placebo. Compared with placebo, ciclesonide 100 micrograms, 400 micrograms, and 1,600 micrograms daily reduced airway responsiveness to AMP by 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.1 to 3.4, not significant [NS]), 2.0 (95% CI, 0.4 to 3.6, p < 0.05), and 3.4 (95% CI, 2.3 to 4. 4, p < 0.05) doubling doses, respectively, and this reduction in airway responsiveness was dose-dependent (p = 0.039). A significant reduction in the percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum was observed after 400 micrograms and 1,600 micrograms daily ciclesonide (p < 0. 05), but this was not dose-dependent. Sputum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) was significantly reduced after 400 micrograms daily ciclesonide only (p < 0.05). Thus, in patients with mild to moderate asthma, assessment of airway responsiveness to AMP, rather than inflammatory parameters in induced sputum, represents a sensitive method to evaluate a dose-response relationship of an inhaled corticosteroid and may have applications in evaluating other novel inhaled corticosteroids.     

Inhaled fluticasone propionate and adrenal effects in adult asthma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

The dose-response relationship of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) for adrenal suppression in adults with asthma is not clear. The current authors carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomised dose-response studies of >or=4 weeks' duration, which assessed the adrenal effects of FP by cosyntropin stimulation tests in adult asthma. The main outcome measure was the proportion of subjects with adrenal function below the lower limit of the normal range. Five studies, with a total of 732 subjects with asthma, met the inclusion criteria. Data on daily doses >1,000 mug were limited to one study. The proportion of subjects with adrenal function below the lower limit of the normal range on placebo was 3.9%; for a 500-microg per day increase in FP dose the odds of an abnormality increased by 1.38 (95% confidence interval 1.01-1.59). The continuous secondary outcome measures showed an inverse linear relationship with the FP dose up to 2,000 microg.day(-1). In conclusion, for routine prescribing within the established therapeutic dose-response range (50-500 microg.day(-1)), fluticasone propionate has minimal effects on adrenal function. This conclusion is limited by the paucity of long-term studies of daily doses of fluticasone propionate >1,000 mug and by the considerable individual variability in the response.     

Unaltered perception of dyspnoea during treatment with long-acting beta2-agonists.

There is the possibility that during treatment with inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists that a loss of perception of dyspnoea might occur and that the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) might fall precipitously during bronchial provocation. This study investigated these possibilities during methacholine provocation, continued until there was > or =30% fall in FEV1, mimicking a moderate asthma attack. Nineteen asthmatic patients were asked to score their dyspnoea as a Borg score during provocation with methacholine. One hour prior to this provocation, the patients used the last morning dose of 14 days treatment with either formoterol (twice daily 24 microg by Turbuhaler), salmeterol (twice daily 100 microg by Diskhaler) and placebo in a double-blind, randomized, double-dummy, cross-over design. The perception of dyspnoea, expressed as the Borg score divided by the change in FEV1 at > or =30% fall in FEV1, was similar on the three test days at 0.067, 0.076 and 0.074%(-1) after formoterol, salmeterol and placebo treatment, respectively (p=0.16). The slope of the methacholine dose response curve did not differ (p=0.52). In conclusion, no suggestion was found for an abnormal perception of dyspnoea or an exaggerated fall in forced expiratory volume in one second during provocation with methacholine under long-acting beta2-agonist treatment.