A decade of experience with abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians.

BACKGROUND: Should abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) be electively repaired in octogenarians? METHODS: This was a retrospective review of patients' charts over a ten-year period starting in January 1995. This study was conducted at St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, New York, which is a tertiary referral center. All octogenarians who underwent AAA repair (elective and emergent) were included in this study (mean age 82.9 years). A total of 71 such patients were identified. Sixty-two patients had elective surgery and nine patients had emergent repair of the ruptured AAA. It was hypothesized before the study was conducted that AAA could be repaired in octogenarians with acceptable morbidity and mortality in an institution with vast experience in dealing with this disease. RESULTS: The mean aneurysm diameter was 6.73 cm. Twenty patients (28%) received bifurcated grafts, while 51 patients (72%) received tubular grafts. Four patients had coronary artery bypass graft before aneurysm surgery. Forty-four patients (62%) were male and 27 (38%) were female. The thirty day mortality rate after elective AAA repair was 1.4%, whereas after the repair of ruptured aneurysms was 44.4%. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the elective repair of abdominal aneurysms in most octogenarians is a safe and life-prolonging procedure if performed in an experienced tertiary center.     

Audit of 200 consecutive aortic aneurysm repairs carried out by a single surgeon in a district hospital: results of surgery and factors affecting outcome.

It has been suggested that surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) be confined to designated centres. A prospective audit of 200 consecutive AAA repairs at a district general hospital was performed between 1981 and 1990. The 30-day mortality rates for elective, symptomatic and ruptured aneurysm repair were 1.4%, 3.5% and 30%, respectively. The major factor affecting outcome after the mode of presentation was the age of the patient, with 30-day mortality rates for emergency treatment increasing from 21% (age range 60-69 years) to 42% (age range 70-79 years). This mortality rate for ruptured aneurysms is an underestimate, with two-thirds of patients with rupture dying before reaching hospital and some patients dying in hospital undiagnosed. The major contribution to improved overall mortality would therefore be detection before rupture (usually by ultrasound) and improved diagnostic accuracy. Many patients with ruptured aneurysms had symptoms for only a short period before presentation (42% for less than 6 h) and required urgent surgery (26% reached theatre within 1 h). These two factors make long-distance transfer of these patients an unrealistic option. The concentration of this type of surgery in relatively few centres will distance the patient from their relatives and reduce the opportunity for the majority of junior doctors to acquire an understanding of the presentation, natural history and management of aortic aneurysms. This understanding when combined with a screening programme is likely to have a far greater impact on the overall mortality from AAA than restricting the centres for surgical treatment.     

Ruptured versus Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Outcome and Cost

During a recent 30-month period, we repaired 10 ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA) at our institution. To evaluate the survival, postoperative morbidity, and financial impact of treating RAAA, we compared these patients with 10 randomly selected patients undergoing elective AAA (EAAA). Both groups were comparable for age, gender, and incidence of diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and renal failure. Although we have noted a dramatic increase in survival for RAAA (90%), the morbidity continues to be unacceptably high (60%). Efforts should be made toward better detection of AAA prior to rupture as well as development of strategies to minimize or prevent these major complications. Potential average savings accrued from one patient undergoing EAAA repair rather than RAAA repair ($93,139. 21) can be used to perform screening abdominal ultrasound tests in patients at increased risk of having an AAA.     

Endovascular ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair – setting up your hospital for an endovascular approach

In recent years, major improvements have been made, making elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) a safe procedure. In selected series, mortality rates are less than 5%. Many of the patients with AAA, however, remain asymptomatic until they present with rupture. Once rupture has occurred, the overall mortality approaches 90%. Despite many advances in the management of ruptured AAA, the mortality rate of conventional open surgery has not improved significantly during the last 15 years. Over the last decade, endovascular techniques have been used increasingly to repair AAA, and there is increasing evidence that endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is technically feasible and safe for ruptured AAA. This review studies the evidence and aids the clinician in setting up a practice to manage rAAAs utilizing an endovascular approach.     

Epidemiological study of the relationship between volume and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in the UK from 2000 to 2005

BACKGROUND: The aim was to assess the relationship between hospital volume and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery in the UK. METHODS: Hospital Episode Statistics (2000-2005) were classified as elective, urgent or ruptured AAA repair. Analysis was by modelling of mortality rate, complication rate and length of hospital stay with regard to the annual operative volume, after risk adjustment. RESULTS: There were 112,545 diagnoses, or repairs, of AAAs, of which 26,822 were infrarenal aneurysms. The mean mortality rate was 7.4, 23.6 and 41.8 per cent for elective, urgent and ruptured AAA repair respectively. Elective AAA repair undertaken at high-volume hospitals showed volume-related improvements in mortality (P < 0.001). Patients were discharged from hospital earlier (P < 0.001). The critical volume threshold was 32 elective AAA repairs per year. For urgent repair, patients at high-volume hospitals had a reduced mortality rate (P = 0.017) with an increased length of stay (P = 0.041). There was no relationship between volume and outcome for ruptured AAA repairs. CONCLUSION: Increased annual volumes were associated with significant reductions in mortality for elective and urgent AAA repair, but not for repair of ruptured AAAs.     

The true incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

The number of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA) was documented over an 8-year-period in a known population age group. Patient figures were collected from the operative and post-mortem registers in the Worthing Health District. The overall mean incidence of RAAA was 13.9/100,000 patient years, although the incidence was noted to increase from 9.2 to 17.5/100,000 patient years during this period. The incidence in the male population rose from 4.7/100,000 for those in the fifth decade to 184.8/100,000 for those above 80. For patients undergoing operation, the peri-operative survival was 38%, however the overall survival was 11% as 64% of patients died at home. These figures demonstrate an increasing incidence of ruptured AAA. They also add support to the need for screening of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms and elective repair if the incidence and hence mortality is to be reduced.     

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: factors influencing operative mortality

Of fifty-eight consecutive patients surgically treated for aneurysm of the abdominal aorta, twenty were emergency cases following the rupture. Associated diseases were found in 85 per cent of patients; hypertension being the most common. Fifty per cent of patients were in shock on admission. The duration between rupture and operation was three hrs to two weeks with the average of 115.5 hrs. In six patients, the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm was known for over six months. The operative mortality rate in case of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm was 45 per cent. The most important determinants of survival were the incidence of shock on admission, the incidence of associated disease, the known duration of the aneurysm, and the time interval from rupture to admission. The intraoperative factors most influencing survival were the type of rupture, intraoperative hypotension, and total blood loss. Comparison of the mortality rate in elective surgery of abdominal aortic aneurysms (5.3 per cent) with that in ruptured aneurysms (45.0 per cent) suggests the necessity for early elective operations whenever abdominal aortic aneurysms are diagnosed.     

Elective aneurysm repair and the incidence of aortic rupture in an ageing population

During the period January 1984-July 1988, 191 abdominal aortic aneurysms were encountered at Gosford District Hospital, NSW, a hospital that services an ageing population. These aneurysms were either repaired or found as the cause of death at post-mortem. During the study, the rate of elective repair rose from 0.25/month during the first 2 years to 3.67/month in the latter 2.5 years. The mortality for repair of non-ruptured aneurysms was 0.9% compared with 55% for ruptured aneurysms. The 15-fold increase in elective repair resulted in the 58% reduction in the incidence of abdominal aortic rupture from 1.87/month to 0.79/month. The mortality rate from known aneurysms fell from 46% to 14% in the final 2 years. Elective aneurysm repair reduces the incidence of and death from abdominal aortic rupture in an ageing population.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in a district general hospital: a 15-years experience

The incidence of patients presenting with both ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) and elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (EAAA) increases with age. The aim of our study was to find out the incidence of RAAA, age and sex groups of patients at risk, and 30-day all-cause perioperative mortality associated with RAAA as well as EAAA repair in a busy district general hospital over a 15-year time period. All patients operated for AAA during 1989-2003, both elective and ruptured, were included in the study. Patients who died in the community from RAAA were also included. The data were collected from the hospital information system, theater logbooks, intensive therapy unit records, postmortem register, and patients' medical notes. We divided the data for RAAA into two groups of 7.5 years each to see if there was any improvement over time in 30-day postoperative mortality. There were 816 cases of AAA, which included 468 RAAAs (57%) and 348 EAAAs (43%). Out of 468 RAAAs, 243 patients had emergency repair, of whom 213 were males. There were 201 patients who had RAAA postmortem (43%). Median age (range) was 73 (54-94) years in males and 77 (52-99) years in females, with a male-to-female ratio of 7:1. The peak incidence of RAAA was over 60 years of age in males and 70 years in females. Incidence of RAAA was 7.3/100,000/year in males and 5/100,000/year in females. For RAAA, 30-day perioperative mortality was 43% (105/243) while overall mortality was 70% (330/468), which includes deaths in the community. There was no improvement in 30-day mortality over time after comparing data for the first 7.5 years (50/115, 43.5%) with those for the second set of 7.5 years (55/128, 43%). There were 348 patients who had EAAA repair over the same period, comprising 282 males, with a male:female ratio of 4.3:1. The 30-day mortality in the elective group was 7.75%. Incidence and mortality of RAAA remain high. A high proportion of patients with AAA remain undiagnosed and die in the community. More lives may be saved if a screening program is started for AAA.     

Influence of presentation on outcome in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVES: In the absence of formal screening abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are detected in an opportunistic manner. Many remain asymptomatic and undetected until they rupture. Incidentally discovered small AAAs are entered into a surveillance programme until they reach a suitable size for repair. The aim of this study was to examine trends in the management of AAA and whether the method of presentation had an effect on subsequent mortality. DESIGN: Observational study in UK district general hospital. MATERIALS/METHODS: This study reports a single surgeon case series identified using a prospectively maintained database. Data on mode of presentation, management and mortality were retrieved from case notes, PIMS hospital database and the Office of National Statistics. RESULTS: Two hundred and five patients were referred with AAAs between 1992 and 2004, 78% presenting in elective circumstances. The surveillance programme fed 33% of the operated cases. Two aneurysms ruptured whilst under surveillance. Overall elective operative mortality was 11.8% and has progressively decreased over time. Thirty-day operated mortality was significantly lower in patients having a period of surveillance than those having immediate elective repair (2.3 vs. 16.3%, p=0.018). A slight reduction in emergency AAA repairs was noted over the study period (r2=0.6) although registered aneurysm deaths continue to increase (r2=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Elective mortality following AAA surgery decreased over the study period. Outcome was better in those patients who had surgery for aneurysms that had been under surveillance. Despite opportunistic screening the population adjusted mortality rate of aortic aneurysms showed a progressive increase. A reduction in deaths from aneurysms is unlikely without a formal screening programme.     

The role of vascular registries in improving the management of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is one of the vascular surgical index procedures and an important part of the total workload. Whichever way treated, it typically has high mortality and morbidity. Furthermore, endovascular repair is still a relatively new treatment method and under evolution. Therefore continuous quality control with subsequent outcome analysis, benchmarking, intervention and reassessment are mandatory to achieve high level aneurysm care. Vascular registries are tools for this audit. The aim of this review is to focus on the problems and solutions related to attempts to improve the management of abdominal aortic aneurysm with emphasis on the experience gathered in Finland. This includes great variations in dynamics over time in Southern Finland. To control the influence of patient selection and case-mix, total hospital mortality is emphasized as the most appropriate outcome measure of the level of treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). Total aneurysm mortality (including total hospital mortality of RAAA and other AAA surgery) is introduced as an outcome measure of vascular service.     

Rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA)--predictors of the early postoperative mortality

PURPOSE: To evaluate the main factors of the 30 days mortality rate of patients operated on for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture (RAAA. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Univariate and multivariate analysis of various factors associated with RAAA was performed in a group of 73 patients operated on for RAAA between 1996-2001. RESULTS: The 30 days mortality rate was 35.6 %. The main factors of mortality were: misdiagnosis, cardio- pulmonary-cerebral resuscitation (CPCR) on admission, configuration of RAAA, number of blood transfusions, hypotension on admission (p < 0.0001) and duration of operation, type of reconstruction and hypertension in anamnesis (p < 0.01). Important factors (p < 0.05) of postoperative mortality were also low haemoglobin level on admission, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter and ischaemic heart disease in anamnesis. The probability of patient's death is the highest (p < 0.003), if factors like CPCR, number of blood transfusions and aneurysm diameter are combined (multivariate analysis, stepwise method). CONCLUSION: The early detection and surgical or endovascular elective treatment of AAA, the regular dispensation of patients with small AAA especially in hypertonics, the correct diagnosis of RAAA without time delay are the best tools for patients survival. The patient's chance for survival increases with highly trained prehospital resuscitation system and experienced team of vascular surgeons and anesthesiologists.     

Epidemiology and Outcome of Aortic Aneurysms in Hong Kong

Abstract The objective of this study was to determine epidemiology and mortality statistics for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in Hong Kong. Data from three sources were obtained and analyzed: (1) Hong Kong Hospital Authority discharge statistics for 1999 and 2000; (2) a survey on aortic aneurysms in public hospitals conducted by the Working Group of Vascular Surgery; and (3) the Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Center aortic aneurysm database. The disease pattern, distribution, and operative mortality were determined. The annual incidence of AAA in Hong Kong is 13.7 per 100,000 population and 105 per 100,000 for those aged 65 and above. About 10% of the AAAs that presented were ruptured. The mean age of the AAA patients was 74 years, with 84% of them over age 65. The operative repair rate for AAAs was low, being only 8% for intact aneurysms and 54% for ruptured ones. Overall, 45% of all aneurysm repairs were performed for a ruptured AAA. There is diverse practice between major vascular centers and smaller regional hospitals. The territory-wide operative mortality rates for intact and ruptured aneurysms were 10% (range 4–24%) and 70% (range 38––100%), respectively. There was no gender bias in the rupture and operative rates. The overall mortality was 17% for intact AAAs and 78% for ruptured AAAs. The average length of hospital stay was 19 days for elective AAA surgery and 13 days for ruptured AAAs. The number of operations in high-volume centers is increasing with a concomitant decrease in operative mortality. There are no definitive data to indicate that the incidence of AAAs is rising, but a trend toward an increasing number of operations in referral centers is noted. The low repair rates for intact AAAs and the high proportion of repairs for ruptured aneurysms suggest that AAAs are undertreated in Hong Kong.     

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: Factors influencing operative mortality

Of fifty-eight consecutive patients surgically treated for aneurysm of the abdominal aorta, twenty were emergency cases following the rupture. Associated diseases were found in 85 per cent of patients; hypertension being the most common. Fifty per cent of patients were in shock on admission. The duration between rupture and operation was three hrs to two weeks with the average of 115.5 hrs. In six patients, the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm was known for over six months. The operative mortality rate in case of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm was 45 per cent. The most important determinants of survival were the incidence of shock on admission, the incidence of associated disease, the known duration of the aneurysm, and the time interval from rupture to admission. The intraoperative factors most influencing survival were the type of rupture, intraoperative hypotension, and total blood loss. Comparison of the mortality rate in elective surgery of abdominal aortic aneurysms (5.3 per cent) with that in ruptured aneurysms (45.0 per cent) suggests the necessity for early elective operations whenever abdominal aortic aneurysms are diagnosed. Presented at the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Japanese Association for Cardiovascular Surgery, Kanazawa, Japan, May 17–18, 1985.     

Mortality,Morbidity, and Costs of Ruptured and Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repairs in Nova Scotia,Canada

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA) have a 78-94% mortality rate. If cost-effectiveness of screening programs for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are to be assessed, direct costs for RAAA repairs and elective AAA (EAAA) repairs are required. This study reports mortality, morbidity, and direct costs for RAAA and EAAA repairs in Nova Scotia in 1997-1998 and also compares Nova Scotia and U.S. costs. We performed a retrospective study of 41 consecutive RAAA and 48 randomly selected EAAA patients. Average total costs for RAAA repair were significantly greater than those for EAAA repair (direct costs: $15,854 vs. $9673; direct plus overhead costs: $18,899 vs. $12,324 [pricing in 1998 Canadian dollars]). Intensive care unit length of stay and blood product usage were the most substantial direct cost differentials ($3593 and $2106). Direct cost for preoperative testing and surveillance was greater in the EAAA group ($839 vs. $33). Estimates of U.S. in-hospital RAAA and EAAA repair costs are more than 1.5 times Nova Scotia costs. Direct in-hospital RAAA repair costs are $6181 more than EAAA repair costs. These in-hospital cost data are key cost elements required to assess the cost-effectiveness of various screening strategies for earlier detection and monitoring of AAA within high-risk populations in Canada. Further studies are required to estimate cost per quality-adjusted-life-year gained for various AAA screening and monitoring strategies in Canada.     

Rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm: concurrent comparison of outcome of those occurring after endovascular repair versus those occurring without previous treatment in an 11-year single-center experience

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this single-center study was to compare findings at presentation and surgical outcome in patients in whom abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) ruptured after endovascular repair and patients in whom AAAs ruptured before any treatment, over a defined period. METHODS: From May 1992 to September 2003, 1043 patients underwent elective repair of intact infrarenal AAAs. Endovascular repair was performed in 609 patients, and open repair in 434 patients. Eighteen of 609 patients (3%) who underwent endovascular AAA repair required treatment because of rupture of the aneurysm after a mean of 29 months (group 1). During the same 11-year period, another 91 patients without previous treatment required urgent repair of a ruptured AAA (group 2). Rupture was diagnosed at contrast material-enhanced computed tomography or by presence of extramural extravasation of blood at open repair. Except for a higher incidence of women in group 2, patients in both groups were similar with regard to demographics and clinical characteristics but differed in findings at presentation. Eight patients in group 1 had a known endoleak before AAA rupture, whereas contrast-enhanced computed tomography, performed in 15 patients at presentation, demonstrated an endoleak in all. Hypotension (systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg) was noted at presentation in 4 of 18 patients (22%) in group 1 and 76 of 91 patients (84%) in group 2. All patients underwent open repair via a transperitoneal approach, except for 4 patients in group 1 and 3 patients in group 2 who underwent endovascular repair of ruptured AAAs. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with hypotension at presentation in group 1 (4 of 18) was significantly less than in group 2 (76 of 91; P < .01). The difference in perioperative (30 day) mortality rate in group 1 (3 of 18; 16.6%) compared with group 2 (49 of 91; 53.8%) was also significant (P < .01). The outcome in group 1 was therefore superior to that in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that endovascular AAA repair complicated by endoleak does not prevent rupture. The data suggest, however, that rupture, when it occurs in these circumstances, may not be accompanied by such major hemodynamic changes and high mortality as rupture of an untreated AAA. Further long-term follow-up and analysis in a larger group of patients are required to confirm the apparent intermediate level of protection afforded by failed endovascular repair, which does not prevent rupture but enhances survival after operation to treat rupture, possibly by ameliorating the hemodynamic changes associated with the rupture process.     

A retrospective study of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms--association with respiratory function and leukocytic granular elastase

Fifty-two cases of abdominal aortic aneurysms including common iliac aneurysms operated on during July, 1981 and December, 1989 have been studied. They were divided into the following three of elective operation (n = 34), impending rupture (n = 5), and ruptured (n = 13) groups. Cases with abdominal operations without aneurysms were randomly selected as the control group (n = 12). Overall operative mortality was 9.6%, consisted of 30.8% of the ruptured, 20.0% of the impending rupture and 0% of the elective operation groups. Respiratory functions including FEV1.0%, V75, V50, V25 and V25/Ht were significantly lowered in the ruptured group. PaO2 of the ruptured group was also significantly lowered in comparison with both the control and the elective operation groups. Leukocytic granular elastase, playing a role of destruction of the elastin component in the pulmonary alveoli and the aortic media, was increased in the patients with ruptured aortic aneurysms, though the difference was not significant. The data suggested the possibility of aneurysm rupture in case with elevated leukocytic granular elastase. Surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm, even in cases with decreased pulmonary function, should be considered aggressively to elimination of ominous result of aneurysm rupture.     

The utility of commercially available endografts in the treatment of contained ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm with hemodynamic stability

PURPOSE: Food and Drug Administration-approved endografts are suitable for the elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with favorable aneurysm anatomy. Our aim is to illustrate the feasibility and versatility of commercially available endografts for emergency AAA repair in hemodynamically stable AAA rupture. METHODS: From June 2001 to July 2002, five patients presented with severe abdominal pain and were diagnosed with contained rupture of an infrarenal AAA. In all cases, patients were deemed unfit to withstand conventional open repair by both the referring outside medical center as well as our center's team. All patients were hemodynamically stable on arrival at our medical center. Measurement and selection of endovascular devices were based on computed tomography (CT) scans performed emergently at the outside referring center. The required emergently procured endografts were obtained within 2 to 4.5 hours (mean, 3.1 hours) of presentation. Complex anatomy at the proximal and distal fixation zones or difficult access was present in every case. RESULTS: All patients survived endograft repair and had successful exclusion of their aneurysm sac on the basis of intraoperative arteriography and postoperative CT surveillance. All were discharged to home at baseline function within a mean of 6.8 days (range, 2-13 days). There were no deaths. There was one postoperative pulmonary embolism, one myocardial infarct, and one type 2 endoleak. Mean operative time and blood loss were 4.67 hours and 217 mL, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 18 months, CT scans showed stable or shrinking aneurysm sacs. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with contained ruptured AAAs who present with hemodynamic stability and comorbidities that preclude open surgery, commercially available endografts are a versatile treatment option even in the face of complicated aneurysm anatomy.     

Extended use of endovascular aneurysm sealing for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) is now an established treatment modality for suitable patients presenting with aneurysm rupture. EVAR for ruptured aneurysms reduces transfusion, mechanical ventilation, intensive care. and hospital stay when compared with open surgery. In the emergency setting, however, EVAR is limited by low applicability due to adverse clinical or anatomical characteristics and increased need for reintervention. In addition, ongoing bleeding from aortic side branches post-EVAR can cause hemodynamic instability, larger hematomas, and abdominal compartment syndrome. Endovascular aneurysm sealing, based on polymer filling of the aneurysm, has the potential to overcome some of the limitations of EVAR for ruptured aneurysms and to improve outcomes. Recent literature suggests that endovascular aneurysm sealing can be performed with early mortality similar to that of EVAR for ruptured aortic aneurysms, but experience is limited to a few centers and a small number of patients. The addition of chimney grafts can increase the applicability of endovascular aneurysm sealing in order to treat short-neck and juxtarenal aneurysms as an alternative to fenestrated endografts. Further evaluation of the technique, with larger longitudinal studies, is necessary before advocating wider implementation of endovascular aneurysm sealing in the emergency setting.     

Comparison of morphologic features of intact and ruptured aneurysms of infrarenal abdominal aorta

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been suggested as a technique to improve outcome of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Whether this technique becomes an established treatment will depend, in part, on the anatomy of ruptured AAA. METHODS: The anatomy of intact and ruptured AAA seen in a university department of vascular surgery over 5 years was reviewed. Aneurysm anatomy was assessed with spiral computed tomographic angiography. Suitability for EVAR was assessed from the dimensions of the proximal neck and common iliac arteries. Neck length less than 15 mm, neck width greater than 30 mm, and common iliac artery diameter greater than 22 mm were declared unsuitable for EVAR. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-three patients with intact AAA and 46 with ruptured AAA were identified. Larger intact aneurysms were significantly associated with longer renal artery-bifurcation distance and more complex proximal neck architecture. In this sample, patients with ruptured AAA were more likely to have larger aneurysms with shorter and narrower proximal necks. Significantly more intact aneurysms were morphologically suitable for endovascular repair compared with ruptured AAA (78% vs 43%; P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ruptured AAA are less likely to be suitable for endovascular repair than are intact AAA, most probably because of larger diameter at presentation. Open repair will likely remain the treatment of choice in most patients with ruptured AAA, because of current morphologic constraints of endovascular repair.