Influence of preservation solution on human islet isolation outcome

BACKGROUND: The influence of the preservation solution used for in situ perfusion of the donor and pancreas storage on islet isolation has received little attention. METHODS: In this prospective controlled trial, we compared the outcome of human islet isolation from pancreata perfused with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution or Celsior, an alternative colloid-free extracellular solution. RESULTS: At the 1-year interim analysis, the viability and insulin secretion of islets isolated from donors perfused with UW (n=19) or Celsior (n=5) were identical. However, total islet recovery (IEQ) and isolation yield (IEQ/g) were 1.8-fold and 2.1-fold inferior in the Celsior group (P<0.05 vs. UW). Overall, 13 (68%) of islet preparations were effectively transplanted from the UW group vs. none from the Celsior group (P=0.01). The clinical study was discontinued and the causes of these differences were further explored in the pig (n=14). In contrast to UW, Celsior induced cell swelling and pancreas edema after only four hours of cold storage. These abnormalities were delayed when the donor was perfused with Solution de Conservation d'Organes et de Tissus (SCOT), an extracellular solution containing polyethylene glycol. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that colloid-free preservation solutions might be suboptimal for pancreas perfusion and cold storage prior to islet isolation and transplantation. Because pancreata are now frequently recovered for islet transplantation, preliminary experimental and clinical data about islet isolation should be obtained prior to the routine implementation of new preservation solutions for abdominal perfusion during multiorgan recovery.     

Pancreas preservation with University of Wisconsin and Celsior solutions

BACKGROUND: Although the use of Celsior has been recently described for heart, lung, liver, and kidney transplantation, no data are available on its use for clinical pancreas preservation. METHODS: We herein describe the results of 112 pancreas transplants preserved with either University of Wisconsin (UW; (n = 56) or Celsior (n = 56) solution at two Italian transplant centers. The groups were comparable with regard to all donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS: Mean cold and warm ischemia times were 10.1 +/- 2.2 hours and 37.2 +/- 8.2 minutes for UW compared to 10.8 +/- 2.4 hours and 38.3 +/- 6.7 minutes for Celsior (P = NS). Delayed endocrine pancreas function was recorded in two UW-preserved grafts (3.6%). Actuarial 1-year patient survival was 94.6% for UW as compared with 100% for Celsior (P = NS). Equivalent graft survival figures were 91.0% for UW as compared with 96.4% for Celsior (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Within the range of cold ischemia times reported in this study, UW and Celsior solutions have similar safety profiles for pancreas transplantation.     

Pancreas preservation with University of Wisconsin and Celsior solutions: a single-center, prospective, randomized pilot study

BACKGROUND: Celsior is an extracellular-type, low-viscosity, preservation solution already used for heart, lung, liver, and kidney transplantation. We report the results of a single-center, prospective, randomized pilot study specifically designed to compare the safety profile of Celsior solution with University of Wisconsin (UW) solution in clinical pancreas transplantation. METHODS: A total of 105 consecutive procurements were randomized to graft preservation with UW (n=53) solution or Celsior (n=52) solution. The groups were comparable with regard to all donor and recipient characteristics. RESULTS: Five grafts were discarded and 100 grafts (50 UW vs. 50 Celsior) were transplanted. Mean cold and warm ischemia times were 11.0 +/- 2.1 hr and 37.2 +/- 6.0 min for UW compared with 10.8 +/- 1.8 hr and 38.1 +/- 5.9 min for Celsior (P =not significant). Delayed endocrine pancreas function was recorded in one graft preserved with UW solution. Eleven recipients (UW 12% vs. Celsior 10%, P =not significant) required a relaparotomy. The mean serum levels of glucose, amylase, and lipase remained comparable between the study arms at equivalent intervals after transplantation. One recipient died with functioning grafts in each study arm; two further grafts were lost to arterial thrombosis (Celsior) and chronic rejection (UW), respectively. Actuarial 1-year patient and graft survival rates overlapped in the two study arms (98% and 96%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Within the range of cold ischemia time reported in this study, UW and Celsior solutions have similar safety profiles for pancreas preservation.     

Two-layer method in short-term pancreas preservation for successful islet isolation

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine whether the two-layer method (TLM) offers advantages over UW storage solution for locally procured pancreata with cold ischemia time of <8 hours for successful islet isolation. METHODS: From October 2003 through February 2005, 22 human pancreata were procured locally from cadaveric donors and preserved using UW solution (n = 11) or TLM (n = 11). RESULTS: Donor characteristics were similar in the two groups, with no statistical difference. Cold ischemia time was 4.5 +/- 0.6 (2.5 to 8) hours in the UW and 5.1 +/- 0.5 (3 to 8) hours in TLM group (P > .05). Organs preserved with TLM were exposed to PFC for 4 +/- 0.5 (2 to 7.5) hours. After TLM preservation, 8 of 11 (72%) pancreata yielded >300,000 IEQ pancreatic islets, which met all criteria for clinical transplantation; after UW cold storage, only 3 of 11 isolations were equally successful (27%) (P < .05). Mean IEQ was higher in the TLM than in the UW group: 349,000 +/- 37,000 vs 277,800 +/- 34,000; IEQ/g was also higher at 5100 +/- 760 vs 3000 +/- 570, respectively (P < .05). Islet quality, characterized by purity, viability, and insulin SI, did not differ statistically in the two groups: 67 +/- 4 vs 74 +/- 4%, 87 +/- 2 vs 83 +/- 4%, and 4 +/- 0.7 vs 4.8 +/- 1, respectively (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The Two Layer Method for locally procured human pancreata with cold ischemia time lower than 8 hours offers significant advantage over UW cold storage increasing the pancreatic islet isolation yield and the isolation success rate.     

Successful pancreas preservation by a perfluorocarbon-based one-layer method for subsequent pig islet isolation

BACKGROUND: The oxygenation of human pancreas by the two-layer method (TLM) during cold storage was recently established for clinical islet transplantation. Simplification of TLM would facilitate the application of perfluorocarbon (PFC) as a regularly used preservation solution for subsequent islet transplantation. The present study examined whether PFC can be used in a one-layer method (OLM) for long-term pancreas preservation before isolation of adult pig islets. METHODS: Resected pancreases were intraductally flushed with cold University of Wisconsin solution and immediately processed (n=6) or subjected to 7-hour storage by OLM (n=8) or TLM (n=10). Subsequently, pancreases were intraductally distended with collagenase NB-8 supplemented with neutral protease. Isolation and purification were performed as previously described. RESULTS: Compared with unstored pancreases (3,670+/-740 islet equivalents [IEQ]) purified islet yield in TLM-stored organs (2,080+/-290 IEQ, P<0.05) was significantly decreased in contrast with OLM-preserved pancreases (3,110+/-520 IEQ, NS). No differences were observed between groups regarding purity (>90%), trypan-blue exclusion (>95%), adenosine triphosphate content, and mitochondrial viability of islets. Stimulation index during static glucose incubation (20 vs. 2.8 mm) was decreased after storage by TLM (1.81+/-0.20, P<0.05) but not by OLM (2.27+/-0.57) if compared with unstored pancreases (2.47+/-0.36). However, transplantation into diabetic nude mice resulted in sustained normoglycemia of recipients of either group until nephrectomy of graft-bearing kidneys was performed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that PFC alone can be used in a one-layer procedure for successful pig-pancreas preservation. This simplification can facilitate the broad application of PFC as pancreas preservation solution without reducing its benefits demonstrated by TLM.     

Testing combinations of protease inhibitor and preservation solution to improve islet quality and yield

Pancreas preservation using an oxygenated two-layer method (TLM) has been reported to improve islet yields, as has supplementation of Liberase with Pefabloc. We hypothesized that using both TLM and Pefabloc could enhance islet yield as compared with preservation in University of Wisconsin (UW) or Histidine-Tryptophan Ketoglutarate (HTK) solution. METHODS: Ninety-eight pancreata with no significant differences of age, body mass index, or cold ischemia time preserved randomly with UW (n = 40), TLM (n = 48), or HTK (n = 10) were processed with (n = 36) or without (n = 66) Pefabloc. RESULTS: The total islet equivalent (IEQ) from TLM-preserved pancreata processed with Pefabloc (n = 12) showed lower yields versus those processed without Pefabloc (n = 36): 216,120 +/- 27,906 vs. 301,427 +/- 21,447 IEQ (P < .05). Islets from 1 of 12 (8.33%) pancreata processed with Pefabloc in TLM were transplanted, in contrast with 15/36 TLM (41.67%) pancreata processed without it. Islet yields were not significantly different among pancreata preserved in UW and processed with Pefabloc (n = 17) versus without Pefabloc (n = 23): 342,693 +/- 45,588 versus 266,609 +/- 29,006 IEQ (P = .149). The number of transplants from UW-preserved pancreata was 3/17 (17.65%) when processed with Pefabloc and 4/23 (17.39%) without. Among the HTK group, there was no significant difference in islet yields between pancreata processed with (n = 7) versus without Pefabloc (n = 3): 248,227 +/- 65,294 versus 483,555 +/- 144,070 IEQ (P = .118). CONCLUSIONS: Pefabloc showed no benefit to improve islet yields. Pancreata preserved in TLM provided better transplant quality islets when processed in the absence of Pefabloc.     

Improved Human Islet Isolation Using Nicotinamide

We investigated the effects of nicotinamide (NA) supplementation of the processing medium during islet isolation. One hundred and two human pancreata were processed for clinical transplantation after preservation either in the University of Wisconsin (UW) or using the two-layer method (TLM). Pancreata were then divided into four groups and retrospectively analyzed. Group I: UW preservation followed by processing without NA, Group II: UW preservation and processing with NA, Group III: TLM preservation without NA, Group IV: TLM preservation with NA. We observed a significant increase in islet yield in Group II (4343+/-348 IEQ/g) [mean+/-SEM], compared to Group I (2789+/-348 IEQ/g) (p=0.005). Similarly, a significant increase in islet yield was observed when NA was used in the processing of organs preserved with TLM (Group IV: 5538+/-413 vs. Group III: 3500+/-629; p=0.02). Furthermore islet yield was higher in Group IV than in Group II (p<0.05). The percentages of preparations that qualified for transplantation were 25, 47, 45, 69% in Groups I, II, III, IV, respectively. Addition of NA to the processing medium significantly improved islet yields in both the UW and TLM preservation protocols, allowing for a higher percentage of islet preparations to qualify for clinical transplantation.     

Human islet transplantation from pancreases with prolonged cold ischemia using additional preservation by the two-layer (UW solution/perfluorochemical) cold-storage method

BACKGROUND: A two-layer (University of Wisconsin solution/perfluorochemical [UW/PFC]) cold-storage method delivers sufficient oxygen to the pancreas during preservation and restores the ischemically damaged pancreas. In this study, we determined whether the additional preservation by the two-layer method could improve islet recovery from human pancreases with prolonged cold storage in UW. METHODS: Human pancreases were procured from cadaveric organ donors and preserved by the two-layer method (UW/PFC) for 2.9+/-0.7 hours (mean+/-SEM) at 4 degrees C after 11.8+/-1.5 hours of cold storage in UW (UW/PFC group, n=7), or by cold UW alone for 11.3+/-0.3 hours (UW group, n=14). The selected pancreases met the criteria of having at least 10 hours of cold storage in UW. All were processed by using a standard protocol of Liberase perfusion with Pefabloc by way of the duct, gentle mechanical dissociation, and Ficoll gradient purification. Transplanted islets were selected with the criteria of the Edmonton protocol (>5,000 islet equivalents [IE]/kg recipient body weight). RESULTS: The islet recovery was significantly increased in the UW/PFC group compared with the UW group (349.2+/-44.1 x 10 and 214.0+/-31.0 x 10 IE, respectively; <0.05). This resulted in islet yields of 4.6+/-1.0 x 10 IE/g of pancreas in the UW/PFC group compared with 2.0+/-0.3 x 10 IE/g of pancreas in the UW group ( <0.05). Five of 7 cases (71%) in the UW/PFC group and 5 of 14 cases (36%) in the UW group were transplanted. The islet grafts in the UW/PFC group improved the ability of glycemic control and decreased exogenous insulin administration in all recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in methods to preserve and recover ischemically damaged human pancreases before islet isolation and transplant could be extremely beneficial to the field of clinical islet transplantation. This preliminary study shows that additional short preservation by the two-layer (UW/PFC) cold-storage method can significantly improve islet recovery and increase opportunities of islet transplantation from human pancreases after prolonged cold ischemia.     

Adaption of neutral protease activity for islet isolation from the long-term two-layer method-stored pig pancreas

BACKGROUND: Islet release from the pancreas is mediated by both collagenase and neutral protease (NP), a critical effector of islet integrity. To prove the hypothesis that adjustment of NP reduces islet damage after prolonged ischemia, adult pig pancreata were digested after 7-hour preservation by the two-layer method (TLM) using a 2-component enzyme blend consisting of collagenase NB-8 and NP. METHODS: After intraductal University of Wisconsin (UW) flush resected pancreata were distended with 4.4 PZ-U/g of UW-dissolved Serva collagenase either before (TLM-preloaded, n = 7) or after (TLM-postloaded, n = 10) cold storage, or for immediate processing (n = 6). NP was adjusted after preliminary experiments to respectively 1.1, 0.2, or 0.8 DMC-U/g for unstored, TLM-preloaded, or postloaded organs. RESULTS: Purified islet yield decreased from 3670 +/- 730 islet equivalents (IEQ)/g in unstored pancreata to 1800 +/- 180 and 2080 +/- 290 IEQ/g in TLM-preloaded or postloaded organs, respectively (P < .05). Although purity was always >90%, IEQ recovery was significantly decreased in TLM-preloaded pancreata. Quality control revealed consistently high viability as determined using trypan-blue exclusion (>95%) or formazan production. Compared with unstored organs (2.47 +/- 0.36; P < .05), glucose stimulation index was reduced in TLM-preloaded (1.48 +/- 0.15) and TLM-postloaded pancreata (1.81 +/- 0.20). Normoglycemia in diabetic nude mice transplanted with islets from TLM-preloaded pancreata was transient in contrast to sustained function in the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Significant amounts of viable pig islets can be isolated after prolonged TLM preservation by reducing NP activity. Nevertheless, early enzyme administration prior to long-term storage deteriorates islet graft function.     

Influence of pancreas preservation on human islet isolation outcomes: impact of the two-layer method

BACKGROUND: Human pancreas preservation for islet transplantation holds additional challenges and considerations compared with whole pancreas transplantation. The purpose of this study was to clarify the limitations of the University of Wisconsin (UW) solution and the potentials of the two-layer method (TLM) for pancreas preservation before human islet isolation. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated human islet isolation records between January 2001 and February 2003. One hundred forty-two human pancreata were procured from cadaveric donors and preserved by means of the UW solution (n=112) or TLM (n=30). Human islet isolations were performed using a standard protocol and assessed by islet recovery and in vitro function of islets. RESULTS: Eight to ten hours of cold ischemia in the UW solution is a critical point for successful islet isolations. It is difficult to recover a sufficient number of viable islets for transplantation from human pancreata with more than 10 hours of cold storage in the UW solution. The overall islet recovery in the TLM group was significantly higher than in the UW group. With 10 to 16 hours of cold storage, the success rates of islet isolations remained at 62% in the TLM group but decreased to 22% in the UW group. Transplanted islets in the TLM group worked well in the recipients. CONCLUSIONS: There are time limitations for using the UW solution for pancreas preservation before human islet isolation. The TLM is a potential method to prolong the optimal cold storage time for successful islet isolations.     

Influence of preservation solution on the isolation and culture of human hepatocytes from liver grafts

A major problem for the isolation and transplantation of hepatocytes is the lack of resources for obtaining viable hepatocytes. Improving this situation would enhance hepatic cell transplantation programs. Our objective was to evaluate the influence of the preservation solutions used during organ retrieval on the quality of hepatocytes isolated from liver tissue. We compared the results of the collagenase perfusion technique for isolation of hepatocytes in human livers flushed with University of Wisconsin (UW) and Celsior preservation solutions. Yield (number of viable cells per gram of tissue), cellular viability, efficiency of cells to attach to culture plates and form a monolayer, and drug metabolizing competence of the hepatocytes were measured. Successful isolation was achieved in 63% of the procedures using the UW solution and 100% of the procedures using the Celsior solution. In the UW group, significantly lower cell viability (38 +/- 41% vs. 79 +/- 14%, p < 0.05), yield of cells (4.0 +/- 5.2 x 10(6) vs. 8.2 +/- 5.6 x 10(6) cells/g, p < 0.05), and protein content at 24 h of culture (0.6 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.3 mg protein per plate, p < 0.05) than in Celsior solution were found. However, similar values of P450 activities were found in both groups. The more successful isolation, better yield, and higher cell viability obtained from human liver grafts preserved in Celsior solution, in comparison to UW solution, suggest Celsior solution as the most appropriate for preserving cadaveric hepatic tissue to be used for hepatocyte harvesting.     

Pancreas preservation with the University of Wisconsin versus Celsior solutions

INTRODUCTION: The use of Celsior solution for organ preservation has not been thoroughly studied in pancreas transplantation. The aim of this study was to compare University of Wisconsin and Celsior solutions for preservation of pancreas grafts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 1995 to December 2005, 72 patients with type 1 diabetes underwent pancreas transplantation. There were 42 men and 30 women, with a mean age at transplantation of 38.1 +/- 7.5 years (range: 27 to 55 years), and a mean duration of diabetes of 22.5 +/- 6.6 years. Recipients were classified into two groups according to the preservation solution: (A) Celsior (n = 28, 38.9%) and (B) Wisconsin (n = 44, 61.1%). RESULTS: The donor and recipient characteristics were similar in both groups. There were five cases of venous thrombosis in the Wisconsin group and two in the Celsior group (P = NS). The venous drainage technique in the former group was portocaval in 19 patients and portoiliac in 25; in the Celsior group, portocaval in 23 patients and portoiliac in five (P = .001). Enteric drainage was used in 19 patients from the Celsior group and 17 patients from the Wisconsin group (P = .01). Actuarial 2-year graft survival was 74.6% in the Wisconsin group and 77.4% in the Celsior group (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: No differences were observed in venous thrombosis between the two groups. The lower rate of venous thrombosis with the portocaval technique was related to the type of venous drainage rather than the type of preservation solution. Celsior solution may be considered as good as Wisconsin solution for pancreas transplantation.     

Comparison of Celsior and University of Wisconsin solutions in cold preservation of liver from octogenarian donors

BACKGROUND: Celsior (CS) has recently been proposed as a cold storage solution for thoracic and abdominal organs. We compared University of Wisconsin (UW) and CS solutions for the preservation of livers from old donors, with regard to initial function as well as short- and long-term graft and patient survival. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study from 1998 to 2002 includes 30 livers from octogenarian donors preserved in CS (n = 15) or UW (n = 15) solution prior to transplantation. Donor and recipient clinical and laboratory parameters as well as liver biopsy results were evaluated in all cases. RESULTS: The distribution of the main donor variables as well as recipient characteristics were comparable between groups. Mean cold ischemia time was 421 minutes in the CS group and 474 minutes in the UW group. Mild steatosis was present in 8 cases in the CS group and 7 cases in the UW group. No primary graft dysfunction or arterial or biliary complications were noted. There was 1 acute rejection episode in the CS group and 4 in the UW group. Late postoperative deaths were observed only in the UW group (ie, 7 of 15). Actuarial graft survival was 100% in the CS group vs 86.7% in the UW group (P = NS) at 3 months, and 100% in the CS group vs 52.5% in the UW group (P =.007) at 12 months. Patient survival was 100% in the CS group vs 93.3% in the UW group (P = NS) at 3 months, and 100% in the CS group vs 59.3% in the UW group (P =.01) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Both CS and UW solutions effectively protect livers obtained from donors >80 years of age during the early postoperative course but the CS group had better long-term results.     

Influence of neutral protease activity on human islet isolation outcome

Observations in rat pancreata have revealed that enzymatic islet release is mediated by both collagenase and neutral protease (NP), a critical effector of islet integrity. Since no information is available about the effect of NP activity on islet release from the human pancreas, the present study evaluated the effect of various NP concentrations on the outcome of human islet isolation. METHODS: Following intraductal collagenase distension, pancreata obtained from adult multiorgan donors were digested using 2000 PZ-U of purified Serva collagenase NB 1 supplemented with 2.6 (n = 10) or 4.5% (DMC-U/PZ-U) (n = 10) of NP. RESULTS: Increasing NP from 2.6% to 4.5% reduced the amount of undigested tissue from 22 +/- 2 to 17 +/- 2 g (P < .05) while simultaneously increasing the volume of digested tissue (26 +/- 2 vs 40 +/- 3 mL, P < .01). Increased NP concentrations increased the islet yield prepurification (459,800 +/- 22,900 vs 587,600 +/- 69,000 IEQ, P < .05), but simultaneously affected islet purification, resulting in equal islet yields (345,700 +/- 31,200 vs 391,500 +/- 35,400 IEQ, NS) and less purity (70 +/- 6 vs 49% +/- 5%, P < .01). A NP concentration of 4.5% reduced the stimulation index (4.7 +/- 1.2 vs 2.0 +/- 0.5, P < .01) and viability (100 +/- 1 vs 95% +/- 3%, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Although increased NP activity seems to improve islet release from adult human pancreata, it significantly affects islet viability and function. The reduction in purity reflected damage to acinar tissue by increased NP activity presumably affecting islet integrity.     

Can the density of native pancreatic tissue slices predict human islet isolation and purification outcome?

INTRODUCTION: With currently available technology, the outcomes of human islet isolation and purification are still inconsistent, in part due to a lack of control of the pancreas donor and the procurement conditions. Using a single donor pancreas, the critical islet mass for establishing insulin independence of approximately 5000 engrafted islet equivalents (IEQ)/kg of recipient weight can only be retrieved from about one third of isolations. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether successful islet isolation and purification outcomes might be predicted from the density of native pancreatic tissue. METHODS: Tissue slices (TS) were obtained from the neck of 9 nondistended human donor pancreata. The density of the TS was determined using gravity sedimentation in continuous density gradients under either iso-osmolar or hyperosmolar conditions. Correlation coefficients were calculated with regard to the density of isolated exocrine and endocrine tissue, donor age, body mass index (BMI), cold ischemia time (CIT), IEQ prepurification and postpurification, IEQ recovery, and purity. RESULTS: (1) There was no change in density over time for TS in 300 mOsm/kg (mean, 1.079 +/- 0.0019 g/cm(3)) (2) In 500 mOsm/kg, there was a significant increase in density from 1.086 +/- 0.0021 g/cm(3) to 1.092 +/- 0.0021 g/cm(3) over time. (3) Density of isolated exocrine and endocrine became more distinct with lower density of TS (r = -0.776; P < .05). (4) Donor age, BMI, recovery of IEQ from gradients, and number of IEQ after purification did not correlate significantly with TS density. (5) In contrast, a significant inverse correlation existed betwen TS and CIT (r = -0.829; P < .05), and between TS versus IEQ number prior to purification (r = -0.867; P < .05). CONCLUSION: No homogeneous distribution of pancreas tissue density was seen among 9 consecutive human organs. Taken together, the density of native pancreas TS is not a suitable sole predictor for successful islet isolation and purification.     

Superiority of the two-layer method before islet isolation confirmed by in vivo viability assessment

BACKGROUND: Although the outcome of islet transplantation has improved, there remains a major obstacle in isolating viable islets from prolonged preserved pancreas. We previously reported that the two-layer cold storage method (TLM) improved the yield and in vitro function. In this study, we performed in vivo accurate functional analyses of islets from TLM-preserved pancreas and investigated pancreatic duct cell viability, which may critically affect islet isolation. METHODS: Rat islets isolated from fresh pancreas (group 1), after preservation in the University of Wisconsin (UW) solution (group 2) or by the TLM (group 3), were examined by assessing islet yields, stimulation indices, cure rates after transplantation to diabetic nude mice, and trypan blue uptake of pancreatic duct cells. RESULTS: TLM significantly improved the islet yield compared with UW cold storage. The cure rates after transplantation were 100%, 0%, and 80% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. This indicates that islet viability was well maintained even after 24 hr of TLM preservation. The percentages of nonviable duct cells were 4.1%+/-1.9%, 48.3%+/-8.0%, and 26.1%+/-21.4% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, showing that the TLM was superior to UW as seen by this duct cell viability assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The TLM used for pancreas preservation before islet isolation results in excellent islet function in addition to improved islet yield comparable to freshly isolated islets. The underlying mechanism may be duct cell viability maintained during TLM preservation. Therefore the TLM is an excellent preservation technique for isolating sufficient numbers of highly viable islets.     

Analysis on donor and isolation-related factors of successful isolation of human islet of Langerhans from human cadaveric donors

We analyzed the preexisting donor factors and isolation variables that affected isolation of human islets of Langerhans. Sixty-nine pancreata from cadaveric donors were analyzed for donor factors of age, gender, body mass index, cause of death as well as graft factors of cold ischemia time, pancreas status, distensibility during intraductal collagenase distension and time of collagenase expansion and digestion. Islet isolations that recovered >100,000 IEQ (n = 53) were compared to those generating less than 100,000 IEQ (n = 16) to analyze the factors affecting islet yield during donor harvest and isolation procedures. The mean islet recovery was 216.0 x 10(3) (IEQ) or 2840 (IEQ) per gram of pancreas. Mean purity was 54%. The success rate of islet isolation was 76%. Mean age was 31 years, and mean cold ischemia time was 6.9 hours. In univariate analysis, the status of the pancreas was the only significant factor for successful isolation, and gender, time of collagenase expansion and digestion were marginal factors. In stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis of donor and isolation-related factors, donor gender, pancreas status and digestion time were significant factors. During the same period we performed three cases of clinical islet allotransplantation and one autotransplantation. This study confirmed that the same donor factors and variables in the isolation process can affect the ability to obtain successful human islet isolation. Enough experience and pertinent review of donor and isolation factors can make islet isolation consistent, supporting clinical islet transplantation without unnecessary cost.     

Pulsatile pump perfusion of pancreata before human islet cell isolation

Machine pulsatile perfusion for whole pancreas preservation might improve yield, viability, and function of human islets recovered after prolonged cold ischemia times. Four human pancreata were procured from cadaver donors (1 non-heart-beating donor) and stored in cold University of Wisconsin (UW) solution for a mean 13 hours prior to placement on a machine pulsatile perfusion device. The four pancreata were perfused for 4 hours with UW solution before undergoing islet isolation. Islets were quantified, viability was assessed, and insulin secretion was measured. Results were compared with nonpumped islet isolations stratified for cold ischemia time (CIT) <8 hours or cold ischemia time >8 hours. The islet yield for the four pumped pancreata was 3435 (+/-1951) islet equivalents/gram pancreas tissue (IEQ/g), compared with a mean yield of 5134 (+/-2700) IEQ/g and 2640 (+/-1000) IEQ/g from pancreas with <8 hours and >8 hours CIT, respectively. The mean viability after machine pulsatile perfusion was 86% (vs 74% and 74% for the <8 hour and >8 hour CIT groups). The mean viable yield (total yield x viability) was 2937 IEQ/g for machine perfusion, compared with 3799 IEQ/g and 1937 IEQ/g from pancreata with <8 hours and >8 hours CIT, respectively. The insulin secretion index of islets after machine perfusion was 6.4, compared with indices of 1.9 and 1.8 for the <8 hour and >8 hour CIT groups. This preliminary data indicates that low-flow machine pulsatile perfusion of pancreata with prolonged cold ischemia time can result in excellent yield, viability, and function.     

Efficacy of renal preservation: comparative study of Celsior and University of Wisconsin solutions

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy of Celsior and University of Wisconsin (UW) solutions on the perfusion and cold storage of renal grafts for human transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analyses of 313 kidney transplants were performed between 2002 and 2005; group A (n = 160), UW solution and group B (n = 153), Celsior solution were used in the preservation of the organs. The mean donor age was lower in group B (group A = 42.67 years vs group B = 38.96 years; P < .05), living donors were more frequent in the UW group (group A = 10% vs group B = 0.9%; P < .001). Multiorgan procurement procedures were more common in the Celsior group (group A = 75% vs group B = 81.7%; P < .001). Recipients with no associated comorbidities were more frequent in the UW group (group A = 50% vs group B = 36%; P < .001). Recipient mean age, cold ischemia time, and HLA matches were comparable. RESULTS: Delayed graft function (group A = 22.7% vs group B = 20.6%), acute rejections (group A = 21.4% vs group B = 18.4%), and serum creatinine at 6 months (group A = 1.75 vs group B = 1.67 mg/dL), 1 year (group A = 1.47 vs group B = 1.74 mg/dL), and 2 years (group A = 1.43 vs group B = 1.58 mg/dL) showed no differences (P = NS). Graft (group A = 82.23% vs group B = 84.11%) and patient (group A = 93% vs group B = 93.69%) survivals at 3 years were similar (P = NS). There were no differences in the causes of graft loss. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of UW and Celsior solutions is equivalent in the cold storage and renal preservation for transplantation.