Use of different immunosuppressive strategies in recipients of kidneys from nonheart-beating donors

In nonheart-beating donor (NHBD) kidney transplants, immunosuppressive management is difficult mainly because of the high incidence of acute tubular necrosis. This has meant that since the start of our NHBD transplant program, several immunosuppression regimes have been used. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the results obtained over 7 years using different treatment protocols. A total of 172 consecutive NHBD transplants performed between April 1996 and December 2002 were treated as follows: G-I (n = 21), cyclosporine (8 mg/kg/day) plus azathioprine plus steroids; G-II (n = 65), low-dose cyclosporine (5 mg/kg/day) plus mycophenolate plus steroids; G-III (n =17), low-dose tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg/day) plus mycophenolate plus steroids; and G-IV (n = 69), daclizumab plus low-dose tacrolimus plus mycophenolate plus steroids. Delayed graft function rates were 76.2%, 72.3%, 76.5%, and 42%, respectively, for the four groups (P = 0.000). Rejection-free patient rates were 76.2%, 46.2%, 35.3%, and 71% (P < 0.001). Vascular rejection rates were 19%, 30.8%, 52.9%, and 18.8%, (P = 0.025). Two-year graft survival was 71.4% in group I, 95.4% in group II, 94.1 in group III, and 93.8% in group IV (P =0.004). Patient survival was worse in group I (75.2% in group I, 100% in group II, 100% in group III, and 96.7% in group IV at 2 years; P < 0.001). The use of daclizumab and low-dose tacrolimus could be effective at lowering the incidence of delayed graft function in NHBDT, with no negative repercussions on acute rejection.     

Cyclosporine A versus tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil and steroids as primary immunosuppression after lung transplantation: one-year results of a 2-center prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVES: Cyclosporine (INN: ciclosporin) A or tacrolimus have been used mostly in combination with azathioprine as primary immunosuppression after lung transplantation. Benefit or risk deriving from the combination with mycophenolate mofetil are yet unknown. METHODS: In a prospective, 2-center, open randomized trial, the combination of cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids was compared with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids as primary therapy after primary lung transplantation. All patients underwent induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin for 3 days. The 2 groups were compared with regard to patient survival, freedom from acute rejection, bronchiolitis obliterans, infectious episodes, and side effects. RESULTS: Between September 1997 and April 1999, 74 lung transplant recipients were randomized to receive either cyclosporine A (n = 37) or tacrolimus (n = 37). Groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, transplant procedure, and cytomegalovirus match. Mean follow-up was 507 +/- 258 and 508 +/- 248 days, respectively. Six- and 12-month survival was similar in both groups (89% vs 84% and 82% vs 71%, respectively; P =.748 at 12 months). Two patients from the cyclosporine A group were retransplanted. Freedom from acute rejection at 6 and 12 months was comparable between groups (46% vs 51% and 35% vs 46%, respectively; P =.774 at 12 months). The mean number of treated acute rejection episodes per 100 patient-days was higher in the cyclosporine A than in the tacrolimus group, but the difference was not statistically significant (0.32 +/- 0.42 vs 0.22 +/- 0.30, respectively; P =.097). Four patients from the cyclosporine A group had to be switched to tacrolimus to control ongoing rejection, whereas no patient from the tacrolimus group had to be switched to cyclosporine A. There was a trend toward more infections (0.7 +/- 0.36 vs 0.55 +/- 0.31, P =.059) in the cyclosporine A group. New-onset diabetes mellitus was observed in the tacrolimus group only (11% vs 0%, P =.151), whereas there was a higher incidence of hypertension (60% vs 11%, P =.03) in the cyclosporine A group. CONCLUSION: This 2-center, prospective randomized study showed high immunosuppressive potency of both cyclosporine A and tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil. No significant difference in incidence of acute rejection was observed between the 2 groups. Moreover, survival and incidence of infection were similar. Incidence of drug-related adverse events were similar, yet their spectrum was different.     

Corticosteroid weaning in the tacrolimus and mycophenolate era in heart transplantation: clinical and neurohormonal benefits

BACKGROUND: Compared with cyclosporine, tacrolimus-based immunosuppression yields improved metabolic outcomes in heart transplantation. Whether corticosteroid freedom provides incremental metabolic benefits in tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil immunoprophylaxis remains uncertain. METHODS: In a prospective trial, 41 heart transplant patients treated with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil underwent steroid weaning immediately after transplantation until weaning was complete. Weaning was interrupted only for treated rejection with or without hemodynamic compromise. Benefits of steroid weaning assessed following the first year included B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), late infections, lipids, blood pressure, hyperglycemia, and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: Of this 41 patient cohort (age 53 +/- 9 years, 50% black American, 35% women) followed for a total of 47 +/- 5 months, 25 had corticosteroids discontinued (62%) by an average of 20 +/- 11 months. No differences between the two groups were noted in baseline characteristics. Significant predictors of failure to wean steroids included higher rejection, BNP, and lower dose of mycophenolate mofetil. No significant benefits of steroid weaning were noted on lipids, blood pressure, hyperglycemia, and BMI. However, late infections (after 1 year) requiring hospitalizations were more frequent in the failure to wean group (0.60.4 vs 0 infections/patient/y, P <.001). INFERENCES: Unlike known metabolic benefits of steroid withdrawal with cyclosporine, heart transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil demonstrate no incremental metabolic benefits, but instead experience benefits of decreased serious late infections. Furthermore, failure to discontinue corticosteroids in this series is predicted by early allograft rejection, use of lower doses of mycophenolate mofetil, and higher BNP levels suggesting poor cardiac adaptation.     

阿来佐单抗行肾移植免疫诱导治疗的有效性和安全性

目的 评价阿来佐单抗行肾移植免疫诱导治疗的有效性和安全性.方法 将89例肾移植受者随机分为试验组(43例)和对照组(46例).试验组于肾移植术前和术后24 h内分别静脉滴注阿来佐单抗15 mg,对照组不接受免疫诱导治疗.受者术后常规应用环孢素A(或他克莫司)+吗替麦考酚酯+泼尼松预防排斥反应.统计两组术后12月内的移植肾功能、急性排斥反应发生率、感染发生率、移植肾功能延迟恢复发生率、移植肾存活率及淋巴细胞计数,并用ImmuKnowTM免疫细胞功能测定法检测受者CD4+T淋巴细胞的三磷酸腺苷(ATP)值.结果 术后12个月内试验组7.0%(3/43)的受者发生病理证实的急性排斥反应,明显低于对照组的23.9%(11/46,P＜0.05).试验组和对照组总体的感染发生率为别为39.5%(17/43)和30.4%(14/46,P＞0.05),两组机会性感染的发生率分另为23.2%(10/43)和17.4%(8/46,P＞0.05).术后3个月内,试验组淋巴细胞计数低于对照组;术后6个月内,试验组CD4+T淋巴细胞ATP值低于对照组.结论 阿来佐单抗行肾移植免疫诱导治疗可维持受者的免疫抑制状态,未见严重不良反应.     

Long-term results of mycophenolate mofetil as part of immunosuppressive induction therapy after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: The addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to the induction protocol resulted in a lower incidence of rejection episodes. However, the question whether MMF should be administered in combination with tacrolimus or cyclosporine has not been answered yet. In our study, we report on the long-term results of triple induction therapy after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), consisting of MMF and low-dose corticosteroids, in combination with either tacrolimus or cyclosporine. METHODS: Between March 1996 and April 1997, 120 consecutive patients, who underwent OLT at our institution, were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 80 received triple induction therapy consisting of cyclosporine and MMF (40) or tacrolimus and MMF (40), in combination with low-dose corticosteroids, whereas the remaining 40 patients served as 'MMF-free' control group receiving dual induction therapy with tacrolimus and corticosteroids. Besides the eight-yr follow-up of patient and graft survival, clinical data were also reviewed for episodes of rejection and infection. Additionally, the early post-operative pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA, immunological active metabolite of MMF) were evaluated. RESULTS: Long-term results provided higher patient and graft survival after tacrolimus/MMF-based induction therapy than after cyclosporine/MMF-based induction therapy. However, the tacrolimus-based control protocol yielded similar results and, therefore, no significantly superior effect was observed when MMF was added. The same observation was made for incidence of rejection and infection episodes. AUC and C(max) of MPA increased in combination with tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine. CONCLUSIONS: Although pharmacological synergy between tacrolimus and MMF was observed, MMF showed no significant beneficial effects in the immunosuppressive induction protocol, neither in combination with tacrolimus nor with cyclosporine.     

Cyclosporine-sparing effect of basiliximab in renal transplant recipients with mycophenolate mofetil

Basiliximab added to a maintenance regimen consisting of cyclosporine microemulsion and mycophenolate mofetil was studied for its effectiveness in allowing early steroid withdrawal in renal transplantation. Furthermore, the cyclosporine-sparing effects between groups with and without basiliximab induction therapy were compared. PATIENTS: Between September 2001 and June 2003, 90 patients underwent renal transplants with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, namely, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone, (group 1; n = 25). During the latter half of the study basiliximab was administered during the induction phase (group 2; n = 65). In group 2, steroids were completely withdrawn on postoperative day 14 in 57 patients. RESULTS: The incidence of acute rejection was significantly higher among group 1 patients (P = .005). The incidence of steroid-resistant rejection in group 1 patients was significantly higher (P = .025). At each time point cyclosporine levels in group 1 patients were significantly higher (P < .01). The incidence of infection was comparable between the groups. Patient and graft survival rates in group 1 were 100% and 100%; in group 2, they were 99% and 99%, respectively. In group 2, steroids were discontinued in 57 patients with permanent withdrawal achieved in 32 patients (56%). CONCLUSION: The use of basiliximab, together with mycophenolate mofetil allowed for a significant reduction in the cyclosporine dose without increasing the risk of acute rejection. Although further follow-up is necessary to confirm the effect, this regimen may attenuate cyclosporine nephrotoxicity thereby affecting the long-term outcomes of renal transplantation.     

Tumor necrosis factor beta gene polymorphisms associated with urinary tract infections after renal transplantation

INTRODUCTION: We investigated whether tumor necrosis factor (TNF) beta(low) or TNFbeta(high) alleles predicted susceptibility to infection or rejection after renal transplantation. METHODS: TNFbeta alleles were determined in 137 (ESRD) patients and correlated with urinary tract infections and rejection within 60 days among 75 consecutive renal transplant recipients. RESULTS: TNFbeta low was more prevalent among African-Americans than caucasians (83 vs. 63%, P=0.02). After renal transplantation, patients with TNFbeta low experienced more urinary tract infections (50 vs. 10%, P=0.002). The incidence of TNFbeta low and urinary tract infections were equivalent in patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil/cyclosporine (CsAA) (n=37) versus mycophenolate mofetil/tacrolimus (n=38). TNFbeta low was not associated with the incidence of delayed graft function (5 vs. 2, P=NS), early rejection (21 vs. 18%, P=NS) or actuarial 1-year graft survival (96 vs. 90%, P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: TNFbeta low was associated with urinary tract infections and TNFbeta high was associated with freedom from urinary tract infections. Neither gene correlated with rejection or l-year graft survival.     

Multicenter Randomized Prospective Trial of Steroid Withdrawal in Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving Basiliximab, Cyclosporine Microemulsion and Mycophenolate Mofetil

Corticosteroids withdrawal from immunosuppressive regimens has thus far been associated with increased risk of acute rejection episodes. In this study, basiliximab, a chimeric monoclonal interleukin-2 receptor antagonist, added to a maintenance regimen consisting of cyclosporine microemulsion and mycophenolate mofetil was studied for its effectiveness in allowing early corticosteroid withdrawal in de novo renal allograft recipients. Primary renal transplant recipients receiving basiliximab, cyclosporine-microemulsion, and mycophenolate mofetil, were randomized to either corticosteroid withdrawal at day four post-transplantation (n = 40) or standard steroid therapy (n = 43). The primary endpoint was the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes. Randomized subjects who underwent transplantation and received at least one dose of basiliximab were analyzed in an intent-to-treat fashion. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months was not significantly different between the steroid withdrawal group (20%) and the standard treatment group (16%). Patient and graft survival was 100% in the steroid withdrawal group while one death in a patient with a functioning graft occurred in the standard steroid group. Seventy-two percent of the steroid withdrawal group remained off steroids at 6 months post-transplant. Allograft function and incidence of adverse events and infections were similar between the two groups. Rapid and early corticosteroid withdrawal among renal transplant recipients receiving basiliximab induction and daily therapy with cyclosporine-microemulsion and mycophenolate mofetil was not associated with an increased risk of acute rejection.     

Basiliximab (Simulect) in renal transplantation with high risk for delayed graft function

BACKGROUND: Basiliximab (Simulect) is effective in reducing episodes of acute rejection in renal transplantation. Delayed graft function (DGF) predisposes to acute rejection and shortens graft survival. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of basiliximab in renal transplantation recipients at high risk for DGF. METHODS: We studied 87 patients (mean age, 59 years), 42 of whom received basiliximab, 20 mg before transplantation and 20 mg on day 4. This cohort was compared with 45 patients without basiliximab. All received cyclosporine (51%) or tacrolimus (49%), mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. DGF was defined as the requirement for dialysis within the first week after transplantation or failure to improve preexisting renal function. High-risk factors for DGF were cold ischemia time, recipient and donor age, non-heart-beating donor, HLA matching, and panel reactive antibody (PRA). RESULTS: The incidence of DGF was 18 (43%) in the basiliximab group versus 28 (62%) in the other patients (P = .07). When allografts from non-heart-beating donors were excluded, this incidence was 14 (38%) in the basiliximab group versus 28 (62%) in the other patients (P = .04). Regression analysis showed basiliximab to be a protective factor: 0.26 (range, 0.09-0.76). Basiliximab was well tolerated, and complications were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab reduced the incidence of DGF in patients who received a high-risk allograft. It was well tolerated, and no adverse events were reported. The use of basiliximab may be considered in patients receiving an allograft who are at high risk for DGF.     

Randomized trial of tacrolimus (Prograf) in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral) with mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Our clinical trial was designed to investigate the optimal combination of immunosuppressants for renal transplantation. METHODS: A randomized three-arm, parallel group, open label, prospective study was performed at 15 North American centers to compare three immunosuppressive regimens: tacrolimus + azathioprine (AZA) versus cyclosporine (Neoral) + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus tacrolimus + MMF. All patients were first cadaveric kidney transplants receiving the same maintenance corticosteroid regimen. Only patients with delayed graft function (32%) received antilymphocyte induction. A total of 223 patients were randomized, transplanted, and followed for 1 year. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline demography between the three treatment groups. At 1 year the results are as follows: acute rejection 17% (95% confidence interval 9%, 26%) in tacrolimus + AZA; 20% (confidence interval 11%, 29%) in cyclosporine + MMF; and 15% (confidence interval 7%, 24%) in tacrolimus + MMF. The incidence of steroid resistant rejection requiring antilymphocyte therapy was 12% in the tacrolimus + AZA group, 11% in the cyclosporine + MMF group, and 4% in the tacrolimus + MMF group. There were no significant differences in overall patient or graft survival. Tacrolimus-treated patients had a lower incidence of hyperlipidemia through 6 months posttransplant. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus requiring insulin was 14% in the tacrolimus + AZA group, 7% in the cyclosporine + MMF and 7% in the tacrolimus + MMF groups. CONCLUSIONS: All regimens yielded similar acute rejection rates and graft survival, but the tacrolimus + MMF regimen was associated with the lowest rate of steroid resistant rejection requiring antilymphocyte therapy.     

Comparative study of cyclosporine and tacrolimus vs newer immunosuppressants mycophenolate mofetil and rapamycin on coronary endothelial function.

BACKGROUND: Endothelial dysfunction contributes to the development of intimal hyperplasia in transplanted hearts by decreasing the protective effects of endothelial-derived nitric oxide. Immunosuppressive drugs may increase the dysfunction caused by rejection and further accelerate the development of graft coronary vasculopathy. This study compares the effect of cyclosporine and tacrolimus vs two newer immunosuppressive drugs, mycophenolate mofetil and rapamycin, on coronary endothelial function. METHODS: An in vitro model of drug incubation in Krebs-bicarbonate solution (4(o)C, 48 hours) using porcine epicardial coronary arteries was developed. Coronary endothelial function studies were performed in organ chamber experiments after incubation with cyclosporine (10(-4), 10(-7) mol/liter), tacrolimus (10(-4), 10(-7) mol/liter), mycophenolate mofetil (10(-4), 10(-7) mol/liter), rapamycin (10(-7), 10(-11) mol/liter), and their vehicles to assess effects on G-protein-mediated vasorelaxations leading to the release of nitric oxide. RESULTS: Exposure to cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil was associated with a dose-dependent decrease in endothelium-dependent relaxations to serotonin (an agonist that binds to 5-HT1D receptors coupled to Gi-protein) but no impairment of relaxations to bradykinin (an agonist that binds to B2 receptors coupled to Gq-proteins). Exposure to tacrolimus and rapamycin caused severe impairment of relaxations to serotonin and a lesser one to bradykinin. We observed alterations of relaxations to the calcium ionophore A23187 after exposure to mycophenolate mofetil and rapamycin. Exposure to rapamycin and mycophenolate mofetil vehicles impaired relaxation to all agonists. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil induce a dysfunction of the vasorelaxing properties of the endothelium that may lead to a decrease in the protective effects of nitric oxide on the vascular wall but that these drugs still have a more favorable vascular profile than do tacrolimus and rapamycin. Decreased endothelial function after mycophenolate mofetil and rapamycin exposure could be caused by their vehicles.     

Calcineurin Inhibitor Minimization in the Symphony Study: Observational Results 3 Years after Transplantation

The Symphony study showed that at 1 year posttransplant, a regimen based on daclizumab induction, 2 g mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), low-dose tacrolimus and steroids resulted in better renal function and lower acute rejection and graft loss rates compared with three other regimens: two with low-doses of cyclosporine or sirolimus instead of tacrolimus and one with no induction and standard cyclosporine dosage. This is an observational follow-up for 2 additional years with the same endpoints as the core study. Overall, 958 patients participated in the follow-up. During the study, many patients changed their immunosuppressive regimen (e.g. switched from sirolimus to tacrolimus), but the vast majority (95%) remained on MMF. During the follow-up, renal function remained stable (mean change: −0.6 ml/min), and rates of death, graft loss and acute rejection were low (all about 1% per year). The MMF and low-dose tacrolimus arm continued to have the highest GFR (68.6 ± 23.8 ml/min vs. 65.9 ± 26.2 ml/min in the standard-dose cyclosporine, 64.0 ± 23.1 ml/min in the low-dose cyclosporine and 65.3 ± 26.2 ml/min in the low-dose sirolimus arm), but the difference with the other arms was not significant (p = 0.17 in an overall test and 0.077, 0.039 and 0.11, respectively, in pair-wise tests). The MMF and low-dose tacrolimus arm also had the highest graft survival rate, but with reduced differences between groups over time, and the least acute rejection rate. In the Symphony study, the largest ever prospective study in de novo kidney transplantation, over 3 years, daclizumab induction, MMF, steroids and low-dose tacrolimus proved highly efficacious, without the negative effects on renal function commonly reported for standard CNI regimens.     

Effect of basiliximab on renal allograft rejection within 1 year after transplantation

Basiliximab is widely used in clinical practice for initial immunosuppressive treatment of renal transplant recipients, seeking to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes without adverse events. This retrospective study included 123 renal allograft recipients transplanted at a single center. All were followed for longer than 1 year after transplantation and treated with calcineurin inhibitor and steroid (methylprednisolone) for prophylactic immunosuppression, but basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil were optional. We compared the outcomes of renal transplant recipients who were versus treated were not with basiliximab as initial immunosuppressive therapy. Basiliximab was used for initial immunosuppression in 42 patients. Their maintenance immunosuppressive treatment included triple (n = 44) or double (n = 79) regimens, including a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine [n = 87] or tacrolimus [n = 36]), methylprednisolone with or without mycophenolate mofetil. Twenty-six (21.1%) patients had a rejection episode within 1 year after transplantation and 22 (17.9%) had infections. Within the first year after transplantation the patients who were treated with basiliximab showed fewer rejection episodes (n = 6, 14.3%) than the patients without this therapy (n = 20, 24.7%), which was not statistically significant (P = .245). However, basiliximab significantly affected the occurrence of rejection episodes among the double immunosuppressive regimen group (P = .006), but not the triple regimen group (P = .098) without an impact on infection episodes (P value of double, triple = .291, .414) within 1 year after transplantation. We concluded that basiliximab was more useful for the recipients treated with double immunosuppression with a calcineurin inhibitor and steroid than for those on a triple regimen including mycophenolate mofetil.     

Evaluation of renal function in liver transplant recipients receiving daclizumab (Zenapax), mycophenolate mofetil, and a delayed, low-dose tacrolimus regimen vs. a standard-dose tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil regimen: a multicenter randomized clinical trial.

Posttransplant chronic renal failure, secondary to calcineurin inhibitor agents, is emerging as a major problem in liver transplantation. We report a randomized clinical trial comparing daclizumab, delayed low-dose tacrolimus (target trough level 4-8 ng/mL, starting day 4-6), Investigational Arm (n = 72), to standard tacrolimus induction/maintenance dosing, Standard Arm (n = 76), with mycophenolate mofetil and tapering corticosteroids in both study arms. The end-points were renal function indicated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD). There was no significant difference in patient survival (86.6% Investigational Arm vs. 92.9% Standard Arm; P = 0.21) or acute rejection (23.2% vs. 27.7%, respectively; P = 0.68). Statistically significant differences in median glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were found in favor of the Investigational Arm. With the CG equation, the GFR at the end of the first week was 110.7 vs. 89.6 mL/min (P = 0.019) without significant differences thereafter. With the MDRD, statistically significant differences extended to the first posttransplant month (86.8 vs. 70.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P < 0.001) with and was seen at month 6 (75.4 vs. 69.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P = 0.038). In conclusion, delayed low-dose tacrolimus, in combination with daclizumab and mycophenolate mofetil, preserves early renal function post-liver transplantation without the cost of increased acute rejection.     

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to mycophenolate mofetil in liver transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus

Diabetes mellitus, a frequent metabolic complication in liver transplant recipients, may be produced by the diabetogenic effect of calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and metabolic effects of a gradual switch from cyclosporine or tacrolimus to mycophenolate mofetil among 12 diabetic liver transplant recipients. One patient was withdrawn from the study due to gastrointestinal side effects. Of the 11 remaining patients, cyclosporine or tacrolimus was completely withdrawn in five patients. Two patients developed suspected acute rejection episodes that were controlled by increasing the tacrolimus dosage. Glycosylated hemoglobin A1C and C-peptide levels were significantly lower at 3 and 6 months after the initiation of mycophenolate mofetil (P<.03 in all cases). Furthermore, urea and uric acid levels were significantly reduced after the change of treatment. In conclusion, a switch from cyclosporine/tacrolimus to mycophenolate mofetil may produce beneficial metabolic effects in diabetic liver transplant recipients, but poses a risk of graft rejection.     

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus in kidney transplant recipients receiving calcineurin or mTOR inhibitor drugs

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM; defined as new insulin use and/or new hyperglycemia) in 528 kidney recipients using different immunosuppressive agents. METHODS: Maintenance therapy included mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine plus glucocorticoids in combination with Group I cyclosporine (263); Group II tacrolimus (60); or Group III sirolimus (205). RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 39.2 (range 9.0-103.8) months. Overall, the number of patients needing insulin was 7.4% (39/528). The incidences for Groups I, II, and III of 7.6%, 11.7%, and 5.9%, respectively, were not statistically different. Characteristics of patients with PTDM included older age (P=0.007); greater body weight (kg) at transplant, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively (P<0.001); greater BMI (kg/m2) at transplant, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively (P<0.001); more acute rejection episodes 28.2% vs. 13.5% (P=0.012); and increased incidence in African Americans (P=0.03). Multivariable analysis demonstrated increased risk for PTDM (defined as new insulin use) for tacrolimus, (hazard ratio [HR] 3.794, P=0.007); treated rejections (HR 2.491, P=0.0115); age (HR 1.407, P=0.0116); and BMI (HR 1.153, P<0.0001). New insulin use occurred sooner and with less total glucocorticoid dose for tacrolimus patients. If PTDM is defined as all cases of new hyperglycemia, then no immunosuppressive drug group demonstrated an increased risk. CONCLUSION.: The risk for developing PTDM is greatest among older recipients, and those obese at the time of transplant; those given steroid pulse therapy were at exceptionally high-risk. PTDM risk reduction should focus on weight loss in the obese end-stage renal disease population prior to transplant.     

Control of antidonor antibody production with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in renal allograft recipients with chronic rejection

BACKGROUND: In renal transplantation, chronic rejection is a major cause of late allograft loss. Recent studies indicate that a subset of chronic rejection is associated with anti-HLA donor specific antibodies (DSA) and complement C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries (PTC). Since rescue therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil has been found to limit antidonor B-cell responses in recipients with acute humoral rejection, we sought to determine whether a similar immunosuppressive regimen might be effective in patients with 'chronic humoral rejection'. METHODS: Four renal allograft recipients with 'chronic humoral rejection' were prospectively identified. The diagnosis was based on: (1) progressive rise in serum creatinine over 12 months; (2) typical pathologic features by light microscopy (transplant arteriopathy and glomerulopathy); (3) widespread C4d deposits in PTC by immunofluorescence; (4) detection of 'de novo' DSA at the time of biopsy. Maintenance immunosuppression was CsA, prednisone and azathioprine (n=3) or prednisone and azathioprine (n=1). Rescue therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil was initiated in all patients, 12 hr after cyclosporine and azathioprine discontinuation. RESULTS: At diagnosis, the mean serum creatinine was 3.9 mg/dl (range: 3.3 to 5.4 mg/dl). DSA was an IgG directed against HLA class II (n=3) or class I (n=2), that is one patient had both anti-HLA class I and class II antibodies. Pretreatment antibody titers varied between 1:8 and 1:128. Rescue therapy was associated with a rapid and sustained decrease in antibody titers. In two patients, DSA became undetectable after 9 months and a repeat biopsy performed after 12 months revealed a decrease in C4d deposition in PTC. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a decrease in DSA production can be induced in renal allograft recipients with 'chronic humoral rejection' by using an immunosuppressive regimen that combines tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Limitation of antidonor antibody synthesis may be important for the treatment or the prevention of chronic rejection in organ transplantation.     

Randomized trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in steroid withdrawal in living donor renal transplant recipients

The introduction of new immunosuppressants has prompted trials of steroid withdrawal. However, several groups have reported a higher incidence of rejection. We conducted a randomized two-arm, parallel-group, open-label, prospective study to compare steroid withdrawal (at 6 months posttransplant) from the regimens of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (FK group) versus cyclosporine + MMF (CSA group). The entry criteria were recipients of first living donor transplants with no diabetes mellitus (DM), congestive heart failure, chronic liver disease, or acute rejection within 6 months posttransplant. The primary endpoint was a biopsy-proven acute rejection episode or treatment failure within 1 year posttransplant. While 87 recipients were assigned to FK (n = 43) and CSA groups (n = 44) before transplantation, 76 recipients (FK 39, CSA 37) could be tapered off steroids at 6 months posttransplant, since 11 were excluded due to acute rejection within 6 months posttransplant (FK two, CSA three) or protocol violations (FK two, CSA four). After steroid withdrawal, the incidence of acute rejection episodes was 0% in the FK group and 13.5% in the CSA group (P < .05). Other results at 12 months posttransplantation were comparable: the incidences of DM 7.8% versus 0% (FK group vs CSA group), hypercholesterolemia 41.0% versus 59.5%, hypertensives 48.7% versus 59.6% as well as the levels of plasma creatinine 1.21 +/- 0.24 versus 1.31 +/- 0.50 mg/dL (P > .05 in every variable). These data suggest that steroid withdrawal is successful in first living donor renal transplant recipients. Tacrolimus may be significantly more effective than cyclosporine to prevent acute rejection after steroid withdrawal.     

Comparison of sequential protocol using basiliximab versus antithymocyte globulin with high-dose mycophenolate mofetil in recipients of a kidney graft from an expanded-criteria donor

This retrospective pilot study investigated use of high-dose mycophenolate mofetil with biological induction and sequential introduction of low-dose cyclosporine in recipients of expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidneys. Fifty-four patients received mycophenolate mofetil 3 g/day for 45 days, cyclosporine 4 mg/kg/day, prednisolone, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG, n=14) or basiliximab (n=40). Acute rejection incidence was 11.3% (7.1% with rATG, 12.6% with basiliximab). Delayed graft function was observed in 31 patients (54%). At one year, measured glomerular filtration rate was 54+/-4 ml/min, with no significant differences between induction therapies. Thirty patients (55%) required > or =1 MMF dose reduction within month 1 due to adverse events (gastrointestinal symptoms, 67%; leucopenia 33%). Leucopenia was more frequent with rATG, while gastrointestinal symptoms were more frequent with basiliximab. Cytomegalovirus replication occurred in three patients (23%) with rATG and 3 (8%) with basiliximab. In conclusion, high-dose MMF, corticosteroids, delayed low-dose cyclosporine and induction therapy offers an excellent risk-to-benefit ratio in patients receiving an ECD allograft.     

Comparison of outcomes after delayed graft function: sirolimus-based versus other calcineurin-inhibitor sparing induction immunosuppression regimens

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus (SRL) may increase the incidence of or prolong delayed graft function (DGF) after cadaveric renal transplantation. This study compares transplant outcomes of SRL-based induction immunosuppression (IS) with other calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) sparing regimens in the DGF setting. METHODS: Adult cadaveric renal-transplant recipients who received transplants between January 1, 1997 and June 30, 2001 and experienced DGF (n=132) were divided into three groups by induction IS: A, depleting antibody (n=41); B, SRL (n=49); and C, neither (n=42). All recipients also received steroids and mycophenolate mofetil with delayed initiation of CNIs when good renal function returned. Patient survival, graft survival, and time to rejection within 1 year of transplantation were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. One-year graft function was compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: The SRL group had longer DGF duration (P=0.01). The three groups had comparable patient (P=0.27) and graft survival (P=0.69), but the depleting antibody group experienced less rejection (P=0.004). There were no clinically significant differences in 1-year graft function. CONCLUSIONS: In our analysis of a large and modern cohort of adult cadaveric transplant recipients with DGF, induction immunosuppression with a depleting antibody preparation reduced rejection, whereas SRL prolonged DGF duration. All three CNI-sparing induction IS regimens resulted in comparable patient survival, graft survival, and graft function.