Short-term effects of statin therapy in patients with hyperlipoproteinemia after liver transplantation: results of a randomized cross-over trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hyperlipoproteinemia is frequent following liver transplantation and may lead to atherosclerosis. Lipid-lowering agents may be useful, but could interfere with the function of the transplanted organ and with immunosuppression. We therefore evaluated in a prospective, randomized, open-labeled cross-over trial the effect of two frequently used 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (pravastatin 10 mg d(-1) and cerivastatin 0.1 mg d(-1)) in hyperlipoproteinemic patients after liver transplantation. METHODS: Sixteen patients (6.3 +/- 2.0 years post-transplantation, cyclosporine n = 11, tacrolimus n = 5) with hyperlipoproteinemia (cholesterol 246 +/- 42, triglycerides 191 +/- 87, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol 161 +/- 35, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol 44 +/- 11 mg d(-1)) were included. Treatment periods of 6 weeks were separated by a 4-week washout period. RESULTS: Both medications were tolerated well, no effects on serum concentrations of liver enzymes or immunosuppressive agents were observed. Cerivastatin and pravastatin decreased (P < 0.001) cholesterol by 21 +/- 10% and 15 +/- 10%, LDL-cholesterol by 27 +/- 14% and 17 +/- 15%, respectively, while triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol concentrations did not change significantly. LDL/HDL-cholesterol markedly improved (P < 0.001) by 29 +/- 16% (cerivastatin) and 16 +/- 16% (pravastatin). Cerivastatin was more potent than pravastatin in patients receiving cyclosporine A, while there was no significant difference in patients receiving tacrolimus. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose cerivastatin and pravastatin significantly improve lipid profiles following liver transplantation without affecting liver function or immunosuppression.     

Reduction of Plasma Cholesterol Levels and Induction of Hepatic LDL Receptor by Cerivastatin Sodium (CAS 143201-11-0, BAY w 6228), a New Inhibitor of 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase, in Dogs

The effects of cerivastatin sodium (BAY w 6228), a new type of inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, on plasma cholesterol concentrations and the induction of hepatic LDL receptors were investigated with beagle dogs and Hep G2 cells. Oral administration of cerivastatin (0.01, 0.03, and 0.1 mg/kg per day) for 3 weeks reduced plasma total and very low-density lipoprotein plus low-density lipoprotein (VLDL + LDL) cholesterol concentrations and increased hepatic LDL receptor binding activity in dogs. Scatchard plot analysis revealed a 1.9-fold increase in the maximum binding capacity of hepatic LDL receptors in cerivastatin-treated animals. Similar results were obtained by administration of pravastatin (1.0 and 5.0 mg/kg/day) for 3 weeks. Binding activity of the LDL receptor, as well as receptor mRNA and protein concentrations, were increased in a dose-dependent manner (0.01–1.0 μM) by exposure of Hep G2 cells to cerivastatin. The results suggest that cerivastatin reduces plasma cholesterol concentrations by increasing hepatic LDL receptor expression. The mechanism of lowering cholesterol concentration by cerivastatin was the same as with the other previously examined HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, but the effects with cerivastatin were apparent at doses much lower than the effective doses of the other drugs. Cerivastatin, therefore, shows potential for clinical use as a potent and efficacious plasma cholesterol-lowering drug. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Atorvastatin treatment beneficially alters the lipoprotein profile and increases low-density lipoprotein particle diameter in patients with combined dyslipidemia and impaired fasting glucose/type 2 diabetes

Diabetic dyslipidemia is featured by hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, and elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol commonly in the form of small, dense LDL particles. First-line treatment, fibrates versus statins or both, of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients has been the focus of debate. We investigated the potential hypolipidemic effects of atorvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor with good triglyceride lowering properties, in patients with combined dyslipidemia and evidence of impaired fasting glucose or type 2 diabetes. Twenty patients were recruited for the study, and after a 60-day wash out period, baseline measurements of lipoprotein parameters, LDL particle diameter, and apolipoprotein B (apoB) degradation fragments were obtained. The group was then randomized, in a double-blinded manner, into 2 subgroups. Group A received atorvastatin (80 mg) and group B received placebo daily for 60 days. After the first treatment period, all patients were reanalyzed for the above parameters. The treatment regime then crossed over for the second treatment period in which group A received placebo and group B received atorvastatin (80 mg) daily for 60 days. All parameters were remeasured at the end of the study. Treatment with atorvastatin resulted in a statistically significant reduction in total cholesterol (41%), LDL cholesterol (55%), triglycerides (TG) (32%), and apoB (40%). Mean LDL particle diameter significantly increased from 25.29 +/- 0.24 nm (small, dense LDL subclass) to 26.51 < 0.18 nm (intermediate LDL subclass) after treatment with atorvastatin (n = 20, P <.005). At baseline, LDL particles were predominantly found in the small, dense subclass; atorvastatin treatment resulted in a shift in the profile to the larger and more buoyant LDL subclass. Atorvastatin treatment did not produce consistent changes in the appearance of apoB degradation fragments in plasma. Our results suggest that atorvastatin beneficially alters the atherogenic lipid profile in these patients and significantly decreases the density of LDL particles produced resulting in a shift from small, dense LDL to more buoyant and less atherogenic particles.     

Effect of fluvastatin slow-release on low density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: baseline LDL profile determines specific mode of action

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of slow-release (XL) fluvastatin on low density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions in type 2 diabetes. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group comparison of fluvastatin XL 80 mg (n = 42) and placebo (n = 47), each given once-daily for 8 wk, in 89 patients with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c: 7.2 +/- 1.0%, LDL cholesterol (LDL-C): 3.4 +/- 0.7 mmol/liter, high density lipoprotein cholesterol: 1.1 +/- 0.3 mmol/liter, and triglycerides (TG): 2.4 +/- 1.4 mmol/liter). At baseline and on treatment, plasma lipoproteins were isolated and quantified. Eight weeks of fluvastatin treatment decreased total cholesterol (-23.0%, P < 0.001), LDL-C (-29%, P < 0.001) and TG (-18%, P < 0.001), compared with placebo. At baseline, there was a preponderance of dense LDL (dLDL) (apolipoprotein B in LDL-5 plus LDL-6 > 25 mg/dl) in 79% of patients, among whom fluvastatin decreased all LDL subfractions, reductions in dLDL being greatest (-28%, P = 0.001; cholesterol in dLDL -29%). In patients with low baseline dLDL (apolipoprotein B in LDL-5 plus LDL-6 相似文献   

Comparison of the efficacy of atorvastatin versus cerivastatin in primary hypercholesterolemia

This 6-week Prospective, Randomized, Open-label Blinded End point (PROBE) study conducted at 12 sites in the United States compared the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin with cerivastatin. In all, 215 hypercholesterolemic patients (low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol > or = 160 mg/dl [4.14 mmol/L]; triglycerides < or = 400 mg/dl [4.52 mmol/L]) were randomized to receive either atorvastatin 10 mg once daily (n = 108) or cerivastatin 0.3 mg once daily (n = 107). Efficacy was assessed by measuring changes from baseline in LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and triglycerides. Atorvastatin produced significantly greater (p < 0.0001) reductions from baseline to week 6 in LDL cholesterol (37.7% vs 30.2%), total cholesterol (27.5% vs 22.2%), and apolipoprotein B (28.6% vs 21.2%), and a significantly greater (p < 0.05) increase from baseline to week 6 in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (6.8% vs 4.3%) than cerivastatin. Atorvastatin treatment was also associated with a greater percent decrease from baseline to week 6 in triglycerides, with a trend toward statistical significance (p = 0.0982). The percentage of patients that achieved the National Cholesterol Education Program LDL cholesterol goal was greater for those receiving atorvastatin (73%) than for those receiving cerivastatin (66%). The proportion of patients experiencing drug-attributable adverse events, which were mostly mild to moderate and related to the digestive system, was significantly less (p < 0.05) with atorvastatin (5%) than with cerivastatin (14%) treatment. In conclusion, atorvastatin (10 mg/day) is more effective at lowering LDL cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic patients than cerivastatin (0.3 mg/day). Both atorvastatin and cerivastatin are well tolerated, with safety profiles similar to other members of the statin class.     

Mechanism of action of a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibitor on apolipoprotein B-100 kinetics in visceral obesity

We examined the effect of atorvastatin, an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, on the kinetics of apolipoprotein B-100 (apoB) metabolism in 25 viscerally obese men in a placebo-controlled study. Very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apoB kinetics were measured using an iv bolus injection of [(2)H(3)]leucine. ApoB isotopic enrichment was measured using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Kinetic parameters were derived by using a multicompartmental model (SAAM-II). Compared with the placebo group, atorvastatin treatment resulted in significant (P < 0.001) decreases in total cholesterol (-34%), triglyceride (-19%), LDL cholesterol (-42%), total apoB (-39%), and lathosterol (-86%); VLDL-apoB, IDL-apoB, and LDL-apoB pool sizes also fell significantly (P < 0.002) by -27%, -22%, and -41%, respectively. This was associated with an increase in the fractional catabolic rates of VLDL-apoB (+58%, P = 0.019), IDL-apoB (+40%, P = 0.049), and LDL-apoB (+111%, P = 0.001). However, atorvastatin did not significantly alter the production and conversion rates of apoB in all lipoproteins. We conclude that in obese subjects, atorvastatin decreases the plasma concentration of all apoB-containing lipoproteins chiefly by increasing their catabolism and not by decreasing their production or secretion. This may be owing to up-regulation of hepatic receptors as a consequence of inhibition of cholesterogenesis.     

Pharmacodynamics, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of the 0.8-mg dose of cerivastatin in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.

Cerivastatin is a third generation hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl-Co-enzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor proven to lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol 28% to 31% in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia when given at 0.3 mg/day. This study evaluates the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of cerivastatin 0.8 mg once daily for 4 weeks. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group trial conducted at 2 study centers, 41 patients (63% women) with primary hypercholesterolemia were placed on an American Heart Association Step 1 diet for 4 weeks. Single-blind placebo was administered for the final 2 weeks, before randomization. Patients received cerivastatin 0.8 mg (n = 28) or placebo (n = 13) once each evening for 28 days. Cerivastatin at 0.8 mg daily was well tolerated. No discontinuations occurred during the study. Adverse events were mild and transient. One cerivastatin-treated patient experienced asymptomatic creatinine kinase, 8x the upper limit of normal (ULN) elevation on the last day of the study, which resolved 6 days after the completion of the study. Cerivastatin 0.8 mg daily significantly reduced LDL cholesterol compared with placebo (-44.0 +/- 2.0% vs 2.2 +/- 2.8%, p <0.0001); total cholesterol (-30.8 +/- 1.4% vs 2.6 +/- 2.1%, p <0.0001), triglycerides (-11.2 +/- 5.9% vs 15.9 +/- 8.6%, p <0.02), but did not significantly alter high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (3.2 +/- 2.1% vs -1.2 +/- 3.1%, p = NS). The pharmacokinetics of the 0.8-mg dose revealed dose proportional elevations in the 24-hour area under the curve and maximum plasma concentration relative to 0.3- and 0.4-mg doses with no change in time to maximum concentration or the elimination half-life in plasma. The increased efficacy and lack of clinically significant laboratory abnormalities or adverse events demonstrates a need for a large long-term study to confirm the safety and efficacy of this dose of cerivastatin.     

Low-density lipoprotein particle size, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, and glucose tolerance in non-diabetic men with essential hypertension

The aim of the study is to investigate serum lipoproteins abnormalities including low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size, and their relationship with other cardiovascular risk factors in men with essential hypertension. Plasma glucose and serum insulin levels during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), serum lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein (apo) A-I. apo B. cholesterol and triglycerides in serum and in lipoproteins, and LDL particle diameter were measured in thirty-eight consecutive newly-diagnosed non-diabetic untreated hypertensive men and 38 healthy male controls. Plasma glucose at baseline, 60 and 120 min during OGTT was significantly higher in patients than controls whereas serum insulin levels did not differ between patients and controls. Serum apo B and triglycerides were significantly raised in patients compared with controls (1.08 +/- 0.17 g/L [mean +/- SD] vs 0.97 +/- 0.22 g/L. p < 0.05, and 1.56 +/- 0.90 mmol/L vs 1.15 +/- 0.57 mmol/L, p < 0.05, respectively). Very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) triglycerides and LDL-cholesterol were increased in patients compared with controls (0.89 +/- 0.79 mmol/L and 0.54 +/- 0.35 mmol/L, p < 0.05, and 4.08 +/- 0.85 mmol/L and 3.60 +/- 0.92 mmol/L, p < 0.05, respectively) whereas high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was lower in patients compared with controls 0.95 +/- 0.22 mmol/L and 1.07 +/- 0.20 mmol/L, p < 0.05). Adjustment for body mass index, abdominal/hip perimeter ratio and area under the glucose curve did not attenuate the relationship between hypertension and VLDL-triglycerides. Six patients and two controls had a mean LDL diameter < or = 25.5 nm and in the former serum triglycerides ranged from 1.86 mmol/L to 2.37 mmol/L. Mean LDL particle diameter in both patients and controls showed an inverse relationship with log-transformed serum triglycerides (r = - 0.51, p < 0.001 and r = - 0.47, p < 0.005, respectively). Among patients, those with serum triglycerides > or = [corrected] 1.58 mmol/L had a lesser mean LDL diameter than those with triglycerides above this threshold (25.78 +/- 0.47 nm vs 26.30 +/- 0.35 nm, p < 0.001). Higher plasma glucose, serum apo B and LDL-cholesterol as well as the decrease in serum HDL-cholesterol in patients with hypertension are consistent with high coronary heart disease risk. Not only mild hypertriglyceridemia but also high-normal serum triglycerides in themselves or as a surrogate of a predominance of small dense LDL particles in plasma convey an additional risk for cardiovascular disease in hypertensive patients even though routine plasma lipids are within or near normal range.     

The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor cerivastatin lowers advanced glycation end products in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Although the association between type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and cardiovascular diseases is well-documented, current knowledge regarding reasons for the increased prevalence of atherosclerosis in DM is incomplete. Advanced glycosylation end-products (AGE) may play an important role in the development of atherosclerosis in diabetic patients. We examined the effect of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (HMGRI) cerivastatin on serum concentration of AGE-CML in patients with elevated fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance or DM. The study was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group comparison of cerivastatin at 0.4 mg daily for 12 weeks (n=34) and placebo (n=35). Patients were characterized by combined hyperlipoproteinemia and the preponderance of dense LDL. Primary objective of the study was the effect of cerivastatin on the concentration of dense LDL subfractions. Here we report on the effect of cerivastatin on the concentration of AGE-CML. After 12 weeks of treatment cerivastatin reduced cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, LDL cholesterol and the concentration of dense LDL. Furthermore, cerivastatin significantly lowered the concentration of AGE-CML by 21% ( P=0,005; compared to -7,5% in the placebo group). The effect on AGE-CML was correlated with the reduction in LDL cholesterol (r=0.355, P=0.003) and LDL apoB (r=0.239, P=0.05). In addition to the lipid-lowering effects of HMGRI, the reduction of AGE-CML observed in our study may entail an improvement of the cardiovascular prognosis in patients with chronic hyperglycemia.     

Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins are associated with hypertension in preeclampsia

Disorders of the lipoprotein metabolism are a major cause of endothelial dysfunction that may result in hypertension and proteinuria, clinical hallmarks of preeclampsia (PE). Lipoproteins and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions were investigated in 15 women with severe PE and compared with 23 women with a normal course of pregnancy. Compared with normal pregnancy, in PE apolipoprotein (apo)B in very low-density lipoprotein was increased by 76% (P = 0.008), and the triglyceride content of intermediate dense lipoproteins (IDL) was increased by 51% (P < 0.001); cholesterol and apoB in LDL were decreased by 26% (P = 0.005) and 23% (P = 0.016), respectively. Although not significant, the LDL profile was dominated by the most buoyant LDL-1. ApoB in the most dense LDL (dLDL), namely LDL-5 and LDL-6, was significantly decreased by 49% (P < 0.001) and 55% (P < 0.001), respectively. Diastolic blood pressure was positively correlated with the triglyceride content of IDL (r = 6.31; P < 0.001 and r = 0.352; P = 0.033 by partial correlation controlling for the presence or absence of PE) and negatively correlated with the concentration of apoB in dLDL (r = -0.500; P = 0.002). In addition, IDL triglycerides correlated negatively with infant birth weight percentile (r = -0.373; P = 0.027) and positively with proteinuria (r = 0.430; P = 0.014). Low birth weight was associated with high IDL triglycerides and low rather than high concentrations of dLDL. Triglyceride-rich remnants are known to cause endothelial dysfunction. Because the triglyceride content of IDL was positively correlated with elevated blood pressure and proteinuria, triglyceride-rich remnant lipoproteins might contribute to the pathophysiology of PE.     

Improvement in the regulation of cellular cholesterologenesis in diabetes: the effect of reduction in serum cholesterol by simvastatin.

Cellular cholesterol homeostasis was examined in 11 hypercholesterolaemic Type 2 diabetic patients prior to and following reduction of serum cholesterol using simvastatin, an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMGCoA) reductase. Following 12 weeks of treatment with simvastatin (10-40 mg day-1), serum cholesterol decreased by 30 +/- 3% from 7.8 +/- 0.2 mmol l-1 to 5.5 +/- 0.2 mmol l-1 (p less than 0.001) and LDL-cholesterol by 35 +/- 4% from 5.7 +/- 0.2 to 3.6 +/- 0.1 mmol l-1 (p less than 0.001). The esterified/free cholesterol ratio in LDL also decreased from 2.75 +/- 0.18 to 1.94 +/- 0.10 (p less than 0.01) after treatment. Cellular cholesterol synthesis, measured by [14C] acetate incorporation into mononuclear leucocytes, decreased by 39 +/- 11% from 231 +/- 13 to 140 +/- 25 mumol g-protein-1 (p less than 0.01). The degree of suppression of [14C]acetate incorporation into cholesterol in normal mononuclear cells by diabetic patients' LDL increased from 32.1 +/- 4.0% to 48.8 +/- 2.5% (p less than 0.001) following simvastatin. The activity of acyl coenzyme A:cholesterol-0-acyltransferase (ACAT) increased significantly by 55 +/- 18% (p less than 0.05) after treatment. Cholesterol synthesis in patients' mononuclear cells correlated positively (r = 0.66, p less than 0.05) with the esterified/free cholesterol ratio of their LDL, while suppression of cholesterol synthesis by patients' LDL correlated negatively (r = -0.64, p less than 0.05) with the esterified/free cholesterol ratio of the LDL following treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Cerivastatin, an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase, inhibits endothelial cell proliferation induced by angiogenic factors in vitro and angiogenesis in in vivo models

Cerivastatin is an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase. It inhibits the biosynthesis of cholesterol and its precursors: farnesyl pyrophosphate and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP), which are involved in Ras and RhoA cell signaling, respectively. Statins induce greater protection against vascular risk than that expected by cholesterol reduction. Therefore, cerivastatin could protect plaque against rupture, an important cause of ischemic events. In this study, the effect of cerivastatin was tested on angiogenesis because it participates in plaque progression and plaque destabilization. Cerivastatin inhibits in vitro the microvascular endothelial cell proliferation induced by growth factors, whereas it has no effect on unstimulated cells. This growth arrest occurs at the G(1)/S phase and is related to the increase of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21(Waf1/Cip1). These effects are reversed by GGPP, suggesting that the inhibitory effect of cerivastatin is related to RhoA inactivation. This mechanism was confirmed by RhoA delocalization from cell membrane to cytoplasm and actin fiber depolymerization, which are also prevented by GGPP. It was also shown that RhoA-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation is mediated by the inhibition of focal adhesion kinase and Akt activations. Moreover, cerivastatin inhibits in vivo angiogenesis in matrigel and chick chorioallantoic membrane models. These results demonstrate the antiangiogenic activity of statins and suggest that it may contribute to their therapeutic benefits in the progression and acute manifestations of atherosclerosis.     

Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: why lower is better

Recent comparative trials of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) suggest that lower is better and that reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to below 100 mg/dL can provide additional clinical benefit. Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) contains more atherogenic cholesterol than LDL-C and is considered a more accurate measurement of the total amount of atherogenic particles in the circulation. Therefore, the principle that "lower is better" may also apply to lowering levels of non-HDL-C. In persons with high triglycerides (200-499 mg/dL), LDL-C remains the primary target of therapy, but non-HDL-C is an important secondary therapeutic target. Non-HDL-C is strongly correlated with small dense LDL as well as apolipoprotein B, an established predictor of cardiovascular disease risk. Current evidence indicates that statins not only rapidly and dramatically reduce LDL-C, but also have a similar effect on non-HDL-C, and that the greater the reduction in LDL-C, the greater will be the reduction in non-HDL-C.     

Effects of simvastatin,an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor,in patients with hypertriglyceridemia

BACKGROUND: Patients with elevated levels of serum triglycerides (TG) often have other associated lipid abnormalities (e.g., low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C]) and are at increased risk of developing coronary heart disease. Although the therapeutic benefits of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) in hypercholesterolemic patients have been well established, less is known about the effects of statins in patient populations with hypertriglyceridemia. HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the lipoprotein-altering efficacy of simvastatin in hypertriglyceridemic patients. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In all, 195 patients with fasting serum triglyceride levels between 300 and 900 mg/dl received once daily doses of placebo or simvastatin 20, 40, or 80 mg for 6 weeks. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, simvastatin treatment across all doses resulted in significant reductions (p < 0.05 - < 0.001) in serum levels of triglycerides (-20 to -31% decrease) and TG-rich lipoprotein particles. Significant (p < 0.001) reductions were also seen in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-25 to -35%) and non-HDL-C (-26 to -40%). Levels of HDL-C were increased (7-11%) in the simvastatin groups compared with placebo (p < 0.05 - < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate the beneficial effects of simvastatin in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.     

Treatment with cerivastatin in primary mixed hyperlipidemia induces changes in platelet aggregation and coagulation system components

Platelet activation, impairment of fibrinolysis, activation of the coagulation pathway, and dyslipidemia are important factors in the pathogenesis and progression of ischemic heart disease, and patients generally need to use an antiplatelet agent. Lipid-lowering cerivastatin, a novel 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, was administered to 20 patients with primary mixed hyperlipidemia for the assessment of the effect of cerivastatin on lipid levels, plasma fibrinogen concentration, factor VII, VIII, and X levels, plasminogen and antiplasmin concentrations, platelet count, and aggregation (adenosine diphosphate [ADP], collagen, and epinephrine induced). Assessments were made immediately after 2 months of a standard lipid-lowering diet, 4 weeks of placebo administration, and 4 weeks of cerivastatin treatment. Cerivastatin achieved significant reductions in triglyceride, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. The significant improvement of the lipid profile was associated with platelet aggregation reduction in vitro stimulated by ADP, collagen, and epinephrine (P < .05, P = .05, P < .005, respectively). Significantly lower levels of factor VII and fibrinogen were observed (P = .001, P < .0001) immediately after cerivastatin treatment. No significant differences were detected in factor VIII level, plasminogen and antiplasmin concentrations, and platelet count after cerivastatin treatment. It was concluded that cerivastatin in mixed hyperlipidemia can exert beneficial changes on specific hemostatic variables and platelet aggregation in addition to its positive effects on plasma lipid values.     

Influence of simvastatin on LDL-subtypes in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and in patients with diabetes mellitus and mixed hyperlipoproteinemia.

This study evaluates the influence of simvastatin on lipid concentrations and on LDL-subtype distribution in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and in patients with type 2 diabetes and mixed hyperlipoproteinemia. Nine patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (LDL-cholesterol: 7.1 +/- 1.1 mmol/L, triglycerides: 1.3 +/- 0.4 mmol/L) and 8 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mixed hyperlipoproteinemia (HbA1c 6.8 +/- 1.1%, LDL-cholesterol: 4.8 +/- 0.7 mmol/L, triglycerides: 2.5 +/- 1.1 mmol/L) were examined. Cholesterol concentration was determined in 7 LDL-subfractions isolated by density gradient ultracentrifugation before and during simvastatin treatment (10-20 mg/d, 4 weeks). Simvastatin decreased LDL-cholesterol (-34%/-30%, all p < 0.05) and triglycerides (-2%, n.s./-25%, p < 0.05), but had little effect on HDL-cholesterol (+7%/+2%, n.s.) in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and diabetes mellitus, respectively. In both groups a significant reduction of cholesterol in each LDL-subfraction was observed. Large-buoyant (LDL-1, LDL-2) and intermediate-dense (LDL-3, LDL-4) LDL were reduced more than small-dense (LDL-5-LDL-7) LDL-subtypes (-36%/-38%/-23%, respectively) in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, while in diabetic patients cholesterol reduction was uniform in all LDL-subtypes (-29%/-27%/-31%, respectively). Simvastatin decreases cholesterol concentration in all LDL-subfractions in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and in patients with diabetes mellitus with mixed hyperlipoproteinemia. However, the relative reduction of individual LDL-subtypes differed between both groups. This suggests that the effect of simvastatin on LDL-subtype distribution depends on the type of underlying hyperlipoproteinemia.     

Effect of atorvastatin on low-density lipoprotein subtypes in patients with different forms of hyperlipoproteinemia and control subjects

Atorvastatin is a potent hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor that decreases low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, but little is known about its effects on LDL subtype distribution in different types of hyperlipoproteinemia. Thus, we evaluated the influence of atorvastatin (10 mg/d, 4 weeks) on lipid concentrations and LDL subtype distribution in patients with hypercholesterolemia (n = 9; LDL cholesterol, 227 +/- 30 mg/dL; triglycerides, 137 +/- 56 mg/dL), patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipoproteinemia (n = 11; LDL cholesterol, 163 +/- 34 mg/dL; triglycerides, 260 +/- 147 mg/dL), and controls (n = 10; LDL cholesterol, 116 +/- 20 mg/dL; triglycerides, 130 +/- 47 mg/dL). Cholesterol concentration was determined in 7 LDL subfractions isolated by density gradient ultracentrifugation before and during atorvastatin treatment. Atorvastatin decreased LDL cholesterol (-36%, -28%, and -41%, all P <.01) and triglyceride (-4%, NS; -2%, NS; -24%, P <.05) concentrations but had little effect on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (-1%, NS; +10%, P <.05; +6%, NS) in hypercholesterolemic, diabetic, and control subjects, respectively. In all 3 groups, a significant reduction in cholesterol in each LDL subfraction was observed. Large-buoyant (LDL-1, LDL-2) and intermediate-dense (LDL-3, LDL-4) LDL were reduced more than small-dense (LDL-5 through LDL-7) LDL in hypercholesterolemic (-45%, -35%, and -32%, P <.05) and control subjects (-48%, -44%, and -25%, P <.05), but in diabetic patients cholesterol reduction was uniform in all LDL subtypes (-32%, -27%, and -29%, P =.45). Thus, atorvastatin decreases cholesterol concentration in all LDL subfractions in hypercholesterolemic, diabetic, and control subjects. However, the relative reduction of individual LDL subtypes differed between these groups. This finding suggests that the effect of atorvastatin on LDL subtype distribution depends on the type of underlying hyperlipoproteinemia.     

Qualitative effect of fenofibrate and quantitative effect of atorvastatin on LDL profile in combined hyperlipidemia with dense LDL.

INTRODUCTION: The association of elevated plasma triglyceride concentrations, decreased HDL-cholesterol, and dense LDL (dLDL) is referred to as the atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype. dLDL particularly plays a role in the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes and may be one of the factors responsible for the increased risk for coronary artery disease in these patients. The effect of fenofibrate and atorvastatin on the LDL subfraction profile in patients with combined hyperlipidemia and a preponderance of dLDL was studied in a sequential design. METHODS: Six male patients with combined hyperlipidemia and dLDL received 160 mg/die supra-bioavailable fenofibrate. After a washout phase of 8 weeks all patients received 10 mg/die atorvastatin for another 8 weeks. At baseline, after fenofibrate, and after atorvastatin treatment LDL subfractions were analyzed by equilibrium density gradient ultracentrifugation. RESULTS: Treatment with atorvastatin and fenofibrate reduced serum cholesterol by 30 % and 21 % (p = 0.046) (p-values for differences between treatment groups), triglycerides by 32 % and 45 %, LDL cholesterol by 28 % and 16 %, and increased HDL cholesterol by 3 % and 6 %, respectively. Atorvastatin and fenofibrate treatment resulted in the following changes of apoB and LDL subfractions: LDL-1 (1.019 - 1.031 kg/L) - 31 % and + 15 % (p = 0.028); LDL-2 (1.031 - 1.034 kg/L) - 14 % and + 57 % (p = 0.028); LDL-3 (1.034 - 1.037 kg/L) - 20 % and + 30 % (p = 0.028); LDL-4 (1.037 - 1.040 kg/L) - 25 % and - 6 %; LDL-5 (1.040 - 1.044 kg/L) - 29 % and - 38 %; and LDL-6 (1.044 - 1.063 kg/L) - 39 % and - 55 % (p = 0.028). As a consequence, fenofibrate reduced LDL density significantly (p = 0.028 versus atorvastatin). CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin decreased all LDL-subfractions to a similar extent (quantitative effect) whereas fenofibrate reduced predominantly dLDL and changed the LDL profile towards medium dense LDL-particles (qualitative effect). Since medium dense LDL have a higher affinity to the LDL-receptor fenofibrate may have a higher antiatherogenic potential than assessed by the reduction of total LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides alone.     

Effects of atorvastatin versus fenofibrate on lipoprotein profiles, low-density lipoprotein subfraction distribution, and hemorheologic parameters in type 2 diabetes mellitus with mixed hyperlipoproteinemia

Diabetic dyslipoproteinemia characterized by hypertriglyceridemia, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and often elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol with predominance of small, dense LDL is a strong risk factor for atherosclerosis. It is unclear whether fibrate or statin therapy is more effective in these patients. We compared atorvastatin (10 mg/day) with fenofibrate (200 mg/day), each for 6 weeks separated by a 6-week washout period in 13 patients (5 men and 8 women; mean age 60.0+/-6.8 years; body mass index 30.0+/-3.0 kg/m2) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (hemoglobin A1c 7.3+/-1.1%) and mixed hyperlipoproteinemia (LDL cholesterol 164.0+/-37.8 mg/dl, triglycerides 259.7+/-107 mg/dl, HDL cholesterol 48.7+/-11.0 mg/dl) using a randomized, crossover design. Lipid profiles, LDL subfraction distribution, fasting plasma viscosity, red cell aggregation, and fibrinogen concentrations were determined before and after each drug. Atorvastatin decreased all LDL subfractions (LDL cholesterol, -29%; p <0.01) including small, dense LDL. Fenofibrate predominantly decreased triglyceride concentrations (triglycerides, -39%; p <0.005) and induced a shift in LDL subtype distribution from small, dense LDL (-31%) to intermediate-dense LDL (+36%). The concentration of small, dense LDL was comparable during therapy to both drugs (atorvastatin 62.8+/-19.5 mg/dl, fenofibrate 63.0+/-18.1 mg/dl). Both drugs induced an increase in HDL cholesterol (atorvastatin +10%, p <0.05; fenofibrate +11%, p = 0.06). In addition, fenofibrate decreased fibrinogen concentration (-15%, p <0.01) associated with a decrease in plasma viscosity by 3% (p <0.01) and improved red cell aggregation by 15% (p <0.05), whereas atorvastatin did not affect any hemorheologic parameter. We conclude that atorvastatin and fenofibrate can improve lipoprotein metabolism in type 2 diabetes. However, the medications affect different aspects of lipoprotein metabolism.     

Comparison of effects on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with type IIa or IIb hypercholesterolemia.

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 52 centers in North America to compare the effects of the new, highly effective statin, rosuvastatin, with atorvastatin and placebo in hypercholesterolemic patients. After a 6-week dietary run-in, 516 patients with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol > or =4.14 mmol/L (160 mg/dl) and < 6.47 mmol/L (250 mg/dl) and triglycerides < or =4.52 mmol/L (400 mg/dl) were randomized to 12 weeks of once-daily placebo (n = 132), rosuvastatin 5 mg (n = 128), rosuvastatin 10 mg (n = 129), or atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 127). The primary efficacy end point was percent change in LDL cholesterol. Secondary efficacy variables were achievement of National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel II (ATP II), ATP III, and European Atherosclerosis Society LDL cholesterol goals and percent change from baseline in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and apolipoprotein A-I. Rosuvastatin 5 and 10 mg compared with atorvastatin 10 mg were associated with greater LDL cholesterol reductions (-40% and -43% vs 35%; p <0.01 and p <0.001, respectively) and HDL cholesterol increases (13% and 12% vs 8%, p <0.01 and p <0.05, respectively). Total cholesterol and apolipoprotein B reductions and apolipoprotein A-I increases were also greater with rosuvastatin; triglyceride reductions were similar. Rosuvastatin 5 and 10 mg were associated with improved achievement in ATP II (84% in both rosuvastatin groups vs 73%) and ATP III (84% and 82% vs 72%) LDL cholesterol goals, and rosuvastatin 10 mg was more effective than atorvastatin in achieving European Atherosclerosis Society LDL cholesterol goals. Both treatments were well tolerated.