Comparison of 1-week vs. 2- or 4-week therapy regimens with ranitidine bismuth citrate plus two antibiotics for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies based on ranitidine bismuth citrate have recently been introduced in clinical practice. AIM: To compare the efficacy of three regimens containing ranitidine bismuth citrate given for 1, 2 and 4 weeks, combined with two antibiotics for the first week, in the eradication of H. pylori. METHODS: Eighty-six consecutive patients (50 duodenal ulcer disease, 36 non-ulcer dyspepsia) with H. pylori infection were offered three eradication regimens: (a) 1-week group (n=28), ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. for 7 days; (b) 2-week group (n=29), ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. for 14 days; and (c) 4-week group (n=29), ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. for 28 days. In all patients, clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.d. were given for the first week. Endoscopy was repeated 1 month after the end of treatment and eradication was considered to be successful if both rapid urease test and histology were negative. RESULTS: Overall, H. pylori was eradicated in 84% (72/86) patients on intention-to-treat analysis, whereas the per protocol cure rate was 89% (72/81). Eradication rates were 23/27 (85%) (95% confidence interval (CI): 66-96%), 25/27 (92%) (95% CI: 76-99%) and 24/27 (89%) (95% CI: 71-98%) in the 1-, 2- and 4-week groups, respectively, on per protocol analysis, and 25/28 (82%) (95% CI: 63-94%), 25/29 (86%) (95% CI: 68-96%) and 24/29 (83%) (95% CI: 64-94%), respectively, on intention-to-treat analysis (P > 0.05, N.S.). No significant differences were observed between groups concerning duodenal ulcer healing, resolution of symptoms and adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-week regimen with ranitidine bismuth citrate, clarithromycin and metronidazole is effective in H. pylori eradication. Prolongation of treatment with ranitidine bismuth citrate for 2 or 4 weeks does not achieve a statistically significant more favourable outcome.     

A new 1-week therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: rani- tidine bismuth citrate plus two antibiotics

Background: One-week triple regimens are currently the most recommended therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. No previous study has evaluated the efficacy of a short-term regimen combining ranitidine bismuth citrate with two antibiotics. Methods: Seventy-two consecutive H. pylori-positive dyspeptic patients were recruited for this randomized, three-centre, open, parallel-group study. They were subdivided into two groups receiving either ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. + clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.d. (group A) or ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. + clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and metronidazole 250 mg q.d.s (group B) for 1 week. H. pylori infection was assessed by CLO-test and histology on both antral and corpus biopsies before and at least 4 weeks after the end of therapy. The bacterium was considered eradicated when both tests were negative. Eradication rates and the number of side-effects were evaluated in each group. The Chi-squared test was used for statistical analysis. Results: One patient with only CLO-test positivity was erroneously randomized to group B and four patients dropped out of the study (two in group A and two in group B), mainly because they refused the second endoscopy. In group A, H. pylori was eradicated in 31 of 36 patients intention-to-treat = 86%; 95% CI = 71–95% and (per protocol 31/34 = 91%; 95% CI = 76–98%). Side-effects occurred in 10 patients (27%) and they were generally mild. In group B, H. pylori was eradicated in 29 of 35 patients (intention-to-treat = 83%; 95% CI = 66–93%; and per protocol 29/33 = 88%; 95% CI = 72–97%). Seven patients (20%) complained of modest side-effects. There was no significant difference between the two treatment arms (P = N.S.); no severe adverse events occurred and none of the patients was withdrawn from the study because of them. Conclusions: The co-administration of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin at low dosage and metronidazole in twice daily doses for 1 week is a short, effective and well-tolerated regimen for the eradication of H. pylori. These findings should provide the impetus for large-scale investigations.     

Comparison of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin with omeprazole plus clarithromycin for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND: Many dual and triple therapy treatment regimens have been proposed for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. However, assessing the relative efficacy of these regimens is complicated by differences in study design, and few well-controlled comparative studies have been reported. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind study involved 530 duodenal ulcer patients, of whom 520 had confirmed H. pylori infection. Patients received 14 days b.d. dual therapy of either ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) 400 mg or omeprazole 20 mg, both with clarithromycin 500 mg to eradicate H. pylori, followed by a further 14 days of treatment with RBC 400 mg b. d. or omeprazole 20 mg o.d. to facilitate ulcer healing. H. pylori eradication and ulcer healing were assessed at least 26 days after the end of treatment. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: H. pylori was eradicated in 90% of patients who received RBC with clarithromycin and in 66% of patients who received omeprazole with clarithromycin (per protocol; P<0.001). intention-to-treat eradication rates were 77% and 60%, respectively (P<0.001). Ulcer healing rates were 97% in the RBC treatment group and 95% in the omeprazole treatment group. Only 3% and 1% of patients in the RBC and omeprazole treatment groups, respectively, were withdrawn due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: RBC with clarithromycin is a simple and highly effective dual therapy regimen for the eradication of H. pylori, and is significantly more effective than omeprazole with clarithromycin. Both treatment regimens are well tolerated and effectively heal duodenal ulcers.     

Triple regimens using lansoprazole or ranitidine bismuth citrate for Helicobacter pylori eradication

Background:

A combination of an antisecretory agent with two antibiotics is considered the ‘gold standard’ for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

Objectives:

To compare the eradication rates and the safety profile of two short-term triple therapies containing lansoprazole (L) or ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) as antisecretory agents.

Methods:

One hundred and twelve H. pylori-positive patients either with peptic ulcer (56 duodenal ulcers: 25 active and 31 with a history of ulcer; 13 gastric ulcers: nine active and four with a history of ulcer) or gastritis (43) were included in an open, randomized, controlled trial. H. pylori infection was initially detected by CLO-test and histology on antral and corpus biopsies. H.?pylori-positive patients were randomized to receive L plus clarithromycin (C) 250 mg b.d. plus tinidazole (T) 500 mg b.d. (LCT) or RBC plus C 250 mg b.d. and T 500 mg b.d. for 7 days (RbcCT). L or RBC were administered for a further 3 weeks in patients with active peptic ulcers. A second endoscopy was performed at least 6 weeks after the end of therapy for the assessment of H. pylori infection by CLO-test and histology. Eradication was assumed if all the tests were negative for H. pylori.

Results:

Forty-eight patients in the LCT group and 45 in the RbcCT group were assessed for H. pylori eradication. The eradication rates, according to intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses were, respectively, 76.8% and 89.5% for the LCT group, and 73.2% and 91.1% for the RbcCT group. No statistically significant difference in eradication rates was found between the two groups by Mantel–Haenszel test. All peptic ulcers were healed. In patients in whom H. pylori had been eradicated, the severity of gastritis was significantly reduced. Side-effects were rare. One patient in the LCT group and two in the RbcCT group were withdrawn because of adverse events.

Conclusion:

Short-term triple therapy with either lansoprazole or RBC is equally effective and well tolerated.

     

Meta-analysis: proton pump inhibitors vs. H2-receptor antagonists--their efficacy with antibiotics in Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether proton pump inhibitors are superior to H2-receptor antagonists in Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. AIM: To perform a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of both antisecretors when co-prescribed with antibiotics. METHODS: Randomized clinical trials comparing proton pump inhibitors vs. H2-receptor antagonists with the same antibiotics were selected. Data sources included PubMed, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and abstracts from congresses up to January 2002. A meta-analysis was performed by combining the odds ratios. RESULTS: Twenty studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean eradication rates with proton pump inhibitors and H2-receptor antagonists plus antibiotics were 74% [95% confidence interval (CI), 71-76%] and 69% (95% CI, 66-71%), respectively. The odds ratio for this comparison was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.09-1.58). The number needed to treat with proton pump inhibitors to achieve eradication success, compared with H2-receptor antagonists, was 25. When studies prescribing very high doses of H2-receptor antagonists (two of the outliers) were excluded, the odds ratio (for proton pump inhibitors vs. H2-receptor antagonists) increased to 1.37, the number needed to treat decreased to 20 and the heterogeneity between the studies decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, proton pump inhibitors are more effective than H2-receptor antagonists when prescribed at usual doses with antibiotics to eradicate H. pylori infection.     

Single vs. double dose of a proton pump inhibitor in triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Triple therapies combining a double dose of proton pump inhibitor plus two antibiotics are the standard treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. Some reports suggest that the use of half the dose of proton pump inhibitor is equally effective. AIM: To compare the efficacy of a single vs. double dose of proton pump inhibitor in triple therapy. METHODS: We conducted a MEDLINE search. The search strategy included the words (pylori) AND (triple, PPI, proton pump, omeprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, amoxycillin or metronidazole). Abstracts of the articles obtained and papers presented at the European Helicobacter pylori Study Group and American Gastroenterological Association congresses from 1996 to 2001 were examined. Inclusion criteria were: (i) randomized studies with at least two branches of triple therapy including a proton pump inhibitor and two standard antibiotics; (ii) branches could differ only in terms of proton pump inhibitor dosage. A meta-analysis was conducted using conventional shareware (Review Manager 4.1). RESULTS: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 2391 patients. Cure rates with double doses of proton pump inhibitor were higher in both the intention-to-treat analysis (83.9% vs. 77.7%; Peto odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.85; P < 0.01) and per protocol analysis (89% vs. 81%; Peto odds ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-2.47; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Triple therapies containing a single dose of proton pump inhibitor are less effective than those containing a standard double dose of proton pump inhibitor.     

One-week therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: ranitidine bismuth citrate plus medium-dose clarithromycin and either tinidazole or amoxycillin

Background:

One-week ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)-based triple regimens may be effective for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. We evaluated the efficacy of two short-term RBC-based eradicating therapies including RBC plus medium-dose clarithromycin and either tinidazole or amoxycillin.

Methods:

Seventy consecutive patients, who underwent gastroscopy for dyspeptic symptoms and were found to be H. pylori-positive, were randomly subdivided into two groups receiving either RBC 400 mg b.d. plus clarithromycin 250 mg t.d.s. and tinidazole 500 mg b.d. (group RBCCT) or RBC 400 mg b.d. plus clarithromycin 250 mg t.d.s. plus amoxycillin 1 g b.d. (group RBCCA). H. pylori status was evaluated by means of histology and rapid urease test at entry, and by ¹³C-urea breath test alone 8 weeks after treatment.

Results:

Sixty-nine out of 70 enrolled patients completed the study: 35/35 in group RBCCT and 34/35 in group RBCCA. One patient in group RBCCA was lost to follow-up. In group RBCCT, at the end of treatment, 32 of 35 patients were H. pylori-negative (per protocol analysis 91%, intention-to-treat analysis 91%; 95% CI: 77–98%). In group RBCCA, 31 of 34 patients returned H. pylori-negative (per protocol 91%; 95% CI: 76–98%, intention-to-treat 89%; 95% CI: 73–97%). Slight side-effects occurred in 3/35 patients (9%) in group RBCCT and in 3/34 (9%) in group RBCCA.

Conclusions:

One-week regimens consisting of RBC plus clarithromycin and either tinidazole or amoxycillin, combine high eradication rates with modest side-effects. No substantial difference was found between the two treatment regimens tested in this trial.

     

High Helicobacter pylori eradication rate with a 1-week regimen containing ranitidine bismuth citrate

Background:

High Helicobacter pylori eradication rates have consistently been reported with 2-week dual therapy regimens of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin. Ranitidine bismuth citrate with two antibiotics may provide an alternative 1-week eradication regimen.

Methods:

This double-blind, randomized, parallel group, international, multicentre study compared ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for 2 weeks (RC) with ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and metronidazole 400 mg b.d. for 1 week (RCM) for eradication of H. pylori in 350 patients with dyspepsia.

Results:

Treatment with RC and RCM eradicated H. pylori (established by the combination of two negative results from two discrete ¹³C-UBTs at nominal weeks 4 and 12) from 89% (95% CI: 84–94) and 92% (95% CI: 88–97) of the observed population, and from 78% (95% CI: 72–84) and 80% (95% CI: 75–86) of the intention-to-treat population. When established only by one negative ¹³C-UBT result at least 28 days after the end of treatment, the respective intention-to-treat rates were 85% (95% CI; 79–90) and 88% (95% CI: 83–93). Both regimens were well-tolerated, only 6% of patients given RC and 4% given RCM discontinued treatment. Median plasma bismuth concentrations at the end of the second week of study were low, at 3.5 and 0.4 ng/mL, respectively.

Conclusions:

Ranitidine bismuth citrate triple therapy for 1 week (RCM) and dual therapy for 2 weeks (RC) were equally effective for the eradication of H. pylori infection.

     

Helicobacter pylori eradication with proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies and re-treatment with ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that short-term triple therapy comprising a proton pump inhibitor, plus clarithromycin and amoxycillin be used as first choice in treating H. pylori infection, while eradication failure patients should be further treated with a quadruple therapy. Nevertheless, conflicting results have been reported using these treatment regimens in different countries. METHODS: A total of 278 patients with H. pylori infection were randomised to receive one-week triple therapy, comprising clarithromycin 500 mg b.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d., and either omeprazole 20 mg b.d. (OAC; 90 patients), or pantoprazole 40 mg b.d. (PAC; 95 patients), or lansoprazole 30 mg b.d. (LAC; 93 patients). H. pylori infection at entry, and eradication 4-6 weeks after therapy had ended, were assessed by rapid urease test and histology on biopsies from the antrum and the corpus. When eradication did not occur, patients were given a 2-week treatment comprising ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d., tetracycline 500 mg t.d.s. and tinidazole 500 mg b.d. (RBTT). Eradication in these patients was assessed 4-6 weeks after conclusion of treatment by a further endoscopy. RESULTS: Six patients were lost to the follow-up. At the end of the first course of treatment, the overall H. pylori eradication rate was 78% (95% CI: 73-83) and 79% (95% CI: 75-84) at 'intention-to-treat' (ITT) and 'per protocol' (PP) analysis, respectively, without any statistically significant difference between treatment regimens, although a trend for better results with the omeprazole combination was observed. Moreover, H. pylori eradication was achieved in 82% (95% CI: 75-97) (ITT) and 86% (95% CI: 69-94) (PP) of 38 patients re-treated with RBTT regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Our data found that this short-term triple therapy is not a satisfactory treatment (< 80% eradication rate) for H. pylori infection. The 2-week triple therapy used as re-treatment in eradication failure patients yielded more promising results.     

Seven-day treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection: ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin and tetracycline hydrochloride

Background: Dual therapy with ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin twice daily for 14 days is an effective regimen for eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection.
Aim: To determine whether this regimen can be improved by the addition of a second antibiotic, tetracycline hydrochloride, whilst reducing the duration of treatment to 7 days.
Methods: Sixty-one out-patients were enrolled to this open treatment study. All had H. pylori infection, as determined by ¹³C-urea breath test and, for those undergoing endoscopy, by rapid urease test. Patients were treated with ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and tetracycline hydrochloride 500 mg all twice daily for 7 days. Eradication of H.␣pylori was assessed by two separate ¹³C-urea breath tests, the first 28–68 days after the completion of treatment, the second 28–162 days later. H. pylori infection was considered cured if both tests were negative.
Results: All 61 patients were included in the intention-to-treat efficacy analysis. Successful eradication of H.␣pylori was achieved in 55/61 patients (90 %; 95% CI: 82–98%). Fifty-nine out of sixty-one patients reported 100% compliance; one patient missed a single dose of medication and the other withdrew at 48 h due to nausea and vomiting. Minor adverse events were reported by 30/61 patients.
Conclusion: One-week triple therapy with ranitidine bismuth citrate, clarithromycin and tetracycline, all twice daily, is a safe and well-tolerated regimen which eradicates H. pylori in 90% of infected patients.     

A systematic comparison of triple therapies for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection with proton pump inhibitor/ ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin and either amoxicillin or a nitroimidazole

BACKGROUND: Triple therapies with proton pump inhibitor/ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC), clarithromycin (C) and either amoxicillin (A) or a nitroimidazole (I) are widely accepted as treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. However, it is not clear which of these antibiotic combinations should be preferred. AIM: To evaluate whether there is a difference in efficacy between triple therapies with proton pump inhibitor/RBC, clarithromycin and either amoxicillin or a nitroimidazole. METHODS: The literature was examined for randomized trials comparing proton pump inhibitor/RBC-C-A and proton pump inhibitor/RBC-C-I. Studies were grouped according to the type of acid inhibitor used (proton pump inhibitor or RBC) and differences between pooled cure rates were calculated. RESULTS: Forty-seven studies were identified: seven using RBC, 39 using proton pump inhibitor, one using both. RBC-C-I was somewhat superior to RBC-C-A, although this difference only reached statistical significance in intention-to-treat analysis. Overall, proton pump inhibitor-C-I and proton pump inhibitor-C-A were equally effective, but in nitroimidazole-susceptible strains, proton pump inhibitor-C-I performed better, in nitroimidazole-resistant strains, proton pump inhibitor-C-A performed better. No serious side-effects were reported and pooled drop-out rates were equal. CONCLUSIONS: In general, proton pump inhibitor-C-I and proton pump inhibitor-C-A are equally effective and therefore other factors such as local prevalence of resistant strains, cost of therapy and options for second-line treatment should determine which regimen should be preferred. When using RBC, the RBC-C-I combination is somewhat superior to RBC-C-A.     

Efficacy and safety of three 7-day Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens containing ranitidine bismuth citrate

Background:

This multicentre, randomized study was designed to assess the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of three novel 7-day triple therapies containing ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) and two antibiotics.

Methods:

We studied patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and gastritis who were randomly assigned to one of three treatment regimens given for 7 days in a b.d. dosing schedule: RBC 400 mg plus clarithromycin 250 mg and tinidazole 500 mg (RBCCT); RBC 400 mg plus clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxycillin 1 g (RBCCA); RBC 400 mg plus tinidazole 500 mg and amoxycillin 1 g (RBCTA). H. pylori status was determined by CLO-test, histology and ¹³C-urea breath test. A repeat breath test was performed at least 28 days after completion of therapy to assess eradication.

Results:

One hundred and fifty-seven patients were eligible for intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) and 140 patients completed the study and returned for assessment of eradication. Intention-to-treat cure rates were 78% with RBCCT, 71% with RBCCA and 61% with RBCTA. An all-patients-treated analysis (APT), performed on evaluable patients, demonstrated eradication rates of 85% with RBCCT, 81% with RBCCA and 70% with RBCTA. No statistically significant difference was found between treatment groups. Twenty-four patients experienced side-effects, but in only seven cases was treatment discontinued due to adverse events.

Conclusions:

A 7-day course of RBC, clarithromycin and either tinidazole or amoxycillin provides a good rate of H. pylori eradication. Three novel RBC-based triple therapies proved to be safe and well tolerated, with discontinuations due to side-effects occurring in less than 5% of cases.

     

雷尼替丁枸橼酸铋联合克拉霉素根除幽门螺杆菌疗效观察

目的 比较雷尼替丁枸橼酸铋联合克拉霉素与奥美拉唑、甲硝唑、克拉霉素两种疗法对幽门螺杆菌（Hp）的根除效果。方法 123例Hp阳性的消化性溃疡患者分为2组：A组62例，以雷尼替丁枸橼酸铋1片（含：雷尼替丁100mg，枸橼酸铋钾110mg）、克拉霉素250mg口服，2次／d，疗程7d；B组61例，以奥美拉唑20mg、克拉霉素250mg加甲硝唑400mg口服，2次／d，疗程7d。结果 A、B两组的Hp根除率分别为86．9％和85．2％，活动期溃疡愈合率分别为97．6％和100％，副反应发生率分别为6．6％和8．2％，两组间Hp根除率、活动期溃疡愈合率和副反应发生率差异均无显著性（均P〉0．05）。结论 雷尼替丁枸橼酸铋联合克拉霉素与奥美拉唑、甲硝唑、克拉霉素两种疗法疗效相当，而雷尼替丁枸橼酸铋联合克拉霉素因价廉、安全在临床上更为实用。     

Meta-analysis: proton pump inhibitor or H2-receptor antagonist for Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIM: To compare H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors as adjuvants to triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. METHODS: H. pylori-infected patients with peptic ulcer were randomized to receive either 300 mg nizatidine or 30 mg lansoprazole plus 1 g amoxicillin and 500 mg clarithromycin taken b.d. for 7 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed 4 weeks after therapy. Using meta-analytical techniques, we combined the results of this study with other randomized controlled comparisons of H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors as adjuvants to triple therapy. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were randomized. H. pylori eradication was 94% (47/50) [95% confidence interval (CI), 83-99%] (intention-to-treat) in the H2-receptor antagonist group vs. 86% (44/51) (95% CI, 74-94%) in the proton pump inhibitor group (P = 0.3). There has been a total of 12 similar studies (1415 patients). The overall efficacy was similar in intention-to-treat analysis: 78% (549/701) with H2-receptor antagonists vs. 81% (575/714) with proton pump inhibitors (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.66-1.12). A non-significant trend favouring H2-receptor antagonist (79% vs. 69%; odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.76-1.71; P = 0.5) was seen in the comparison of clarithromycin-containing regimens. In contrast, in non-clarithromycin-containing trials, there was a slight, but significant, advantage with proton pump inhibitors (85% vs. 78%; odds ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.92; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Overall, proton pump inhibitor and H2-receptor antagonist antisecretory agents appear to be similarly effective as adjuvants for H. pylori triple therapy. It is unlikely that the direct anti-H. pylori effect of proton pump inhibitors is responsible for their ability to enhance anti-H. pylori therapy.     

Efficacy of a 1-week regimen of ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with metronidazole and clarithromycin for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND: In order to improve the efficacy and simplicity of the FDA-approved regimen of ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) and clarithromycin dual therapy, we added an inexpensive antibiotic (metronidazole), changed the dosage scheme to twice daily dosing, and decreased the duration of therapy to 1 week. METHODS: This was an open label study in which subjects with previously untreated Helicobacter pylori infection documented by serology or endoscopy and confirmed by the 13C-urea breath test received a 1-week course of RBC 400 mg b.d., metronidazole 500 mg b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. A repeat breath test was performed 4-6 weeks after completing therapy. RESULTS: Forty-seven out of 50 subjects completed the protocol. Intention-to-treat and per protocol cure rates were 86% and 91%, respectively. The regimen was well tolerated. Study drugs were stopped in two patients due to side-effects. The most common side-effect was self-limited diarrhoea. CONCLUSION: Twice daily RBC-based triple therapy with metronidazole and clarithromycin for 1 week is well tolerated and effective in eradicating H. pylori infection.     

Seven-day triple therapy with ranitidine bismuth citrate or omeprazole and two antibiotics for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer: a multicentre, randomized, single-blind study

AIM: To investigate the efficacy of a 1-week triple therapy with amoxycillin, clarithromycin, and omeprazole or ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) in curing Helicobacter pylori infection and healing duodenal ulcers. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-two consecutive out-patients with duodenal ulcer, in whom H. pylori infection was confirmed by histology and a urease biopsy test, were randomly assigned to a 1-week treatment with either 400 mg b.d. ranitidine bismuth citrate (RAC group) or 20 mg omeprazole b.d. (OAC group) in combination with 1 g amoxycillin b.d. and 500 mg clarithromycin b.d. RESULTS: Eradication of H. pylori was successful in 77% (per protocol) and 61% (intention-to-treat) of the patients in the RAC group and in 79% (per protocol) and 70% (intention-to-treat) of those in the OAC group. The difference was not significant. Per protocol analysis showed ulcers were healed in 97% of patients in the RAC group and 96% in the OAC group. Adverse effects were seen in four patients in each group: they caused discontinuation of the therapy in one patient of the OAC group. CONCLUSIONS: Eradication rates obtained in this study were lower than those expected on the basis of previously reported studies. The two 1-week treatment regimens were equally effective in healing H. pylori associated duodenal ulcer disease.     

Meta-analysis: high-dose proton pump inhibitors vs. standard dose in triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

Background The evidence on whether high‐dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) increase cure rates of Helicobacter pylori treatment has not been previously assessed. Aim To evaluate the evidence on the usefulness of high‐dose PPI in standard triple therapy by performing a systematic review and a meta‐analysis. Methods A systematic search was performed in multiple databases and in the abstracts submitted to the Digestive Diseases Week, the European Helicobacter Study Group congress and the United European Gastroenterology Week. Randomized trials comparing a standard dose of a PPI with high‐dose PPI both twice a day in triple therapy combining a PPI plus clarithromycin and either amoxicillin or metronidazole were selected. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for all comparisons were calculated using Review Manager. Results Six studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All used triple therapy for 7 days. A mean intention‐to‐treat cure rate of 82% was achieved with high‐dose PPI and one of 74% with standard dose (RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.01–1.17). Subgroup analysis showed that the maximum increase was observed when the PPI compared were omeprazole 20 mg or pantoprazole 40 mg vs. esomeprazole 40 mg. Conclusion High‐dose PPI seems more effective than standard‐dose for curing H. pylori infection in 7‐day triple therapy.     

Five-day regimens containing ranitidine bismuth citrate plus high-dose clarithromycin and either amoxycillin or tinidazole for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: Ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)-based triple therapies for a period of 7 days have proved to be an effective treatment for Helicobacter pylori. AIM: To investigate the eradication efficacy, safety profile and patient compliance of two RBC-based triple therapies given for 5 days. METHODS: Eighty H. pylori-positive patients with dyspeptic symptoms, referred to us for gastroscopy, were consecutively enrolled in this prospective, randomized, open-label study. These patients were randomly assigned to receive a 5-day course of RBC 400 mg b.d. plus clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and either tinidazole 500 mg b.d. (RBCCT group) or amoxycillin 1 g b.d. (RBCCA group). The H. pylori status was assessed by means of histology and rapid urease test at entry, and by 13C-urea breath test 8 weeks after the completion of treatment. RESULTS: All enrolled patients completed the study. Thirty-seven of 40 patients treated with RBCCT (both PP and ITT analysis: 93%; 95% CI: 80-98%) and 35 of 40 in the RBCCA group (both PP and ITT analysis: 88%; 95% CI: 73-96%) returned H. pylori-negative. Slight or mild side-effects occurred in 4/40 patients (10%) in the RBCCT group and in 5/40 (12%) in the RBCCA group. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study demonstrating the efficacy of RBC-based triple therapies given for only 5 days. RBC regimens containing high-dose clarithromycin and either amoxycillin or tinidazole prove to be well tolerated, safe and preserve good eradication rates even when administered for a shorter than conventional duration.     

Meta-analysis: the influence of pre-treatment with a proton pump inhibitor on Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND: There is much debate about the influence of pre-treatment with a proton pump inhibitor on Helicobacter pylori eradication. The few studies investigating the influence of pre-treatment on triple and quadruple therapies did not find differences in eradication rates. However, the high eradication rates make it difficult to study factors associated with therapy failure in small populations. In order to overcome this problem we performed a meta-analysis. METHODS: The literature was searched in order to identify randomized clinical trials comparing modern triple/quadruple therapies for H. pylori eradication without pre-treatment with a proton pump inhibitor with exactly the same regimen with pre-treatment. The overall risk difference (with - without pre-treatment) was calculated by pooling the risk differences of the individual studies weighted by the inverse of their variances. RESULTS: Nine studies, investigating a total of 773 patients, were identified. There was considerable variation regarding therapy regimen and duration. Pooled eradication rates were 81.3% (312 of 384) for patients with pre-treatment and 81.2% (316 of 389) for patients without pre-treatment. The (weighted) overall risk difference was 0.1% (95% CI: -5%; 5%). CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment with a proton pump inhibitor does not influence H. pylori eradication.