Impact of occult hepatitis B virus infection on efficacy and prognosis of interferon-alpha therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is reported that some patients with undetectable hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) have serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV). The aim of this study was to elucidate the impact of occult HBV infection on the efficacy and prognosis of interferon-alpha (IFN) therapy in HCV patients. METHODS: One hundred and forty HCV patients without HBsAg who received IFN therapy were studied. Serum HBV DNA was quantified by real-time detection polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Of 140 patients, 11 (7.9%) were HBV DNA-positive before IFN therapy. The serum HBV DNA levels ranged from 106 to 884 copies/ml. Four of these 11 patients showed a sustained virologic response by IFN, compared with 39 of 129 without HBV DNA (P = NS). Interestingly, two of the 11 patients developed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after therapy, compared with 16 of 129 without HBV DNA (P = NS). In the serial study, serum HBV DNA was transiently undetectable during and after IFN; however, most became positive during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Occult HBV infection may not have a significant impact on response to IFN therapy for chronic HCV and development of HCC after therapy. Occult HBV may be sensitive to IFN although HBV is not completely eradicated.     

Two patients treated with pegylated interferon/ribavirin/telaprevir triple therapy for recurrent hepatitis C after living donor liver transplantation

It is difficult to use protease inhibitors in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) due to interaction with immunosuppressive drugs. We report our experience with two patients treated with telaprevir (TVR) combined with pegylated interferon/ribavirin (PEG IFN/RBV) for recurrent HCV genotype 1 infection after LT. The first was a 63‐year‐old man with HCV‐related liver cirrhosis, who failed to respond to IFN‐β plus RBV after LT. Treatment was switched to PEG IFN‐α‐2b plus RBV and TVR was started. The donor had TT genotype of interleukin (IL)‐28 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) (rs8099917). The recipient had TT genotype of IL‐28 SNP (rs8099917). Completion of 12‐week triple therapy was followed by PEG IFN‐α‐2b plus RBV for 36 weeks. Finally, he had sustained viral response. The second was a 70‐year‐old woman with HCV‐related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. She failed to respond to PEG IFN‐α‐2b plus RBV after LT, and was subsequently switched to PEG IFN‐α‐2b/RBV/TVR. Genotype analysis showed TG genotype of IL‐28 SNP for the donor, and TT genotype of IL‐28 SNP for the recipient. Serum HCV RNA titer decreased below the detection limit at 5 weeks. However, triple therapy was withdrawn at 11 weeks due to general fatigue, which resulted in HCV RNA rebound 4 weeks later. Both patients were treated with cyclosporin, starting with a small dose to avoid interactions with TVR. TVR is a potentially suitable agent for LT recipients who do not respond to PEG IFN‐α‐2b plus RBV after LT.     

Occult hepatitis B virus infection in HIV‐infected patients: Evaluation of biochemical,virological and molecular parameters

Aim: To determine the prevalence of occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in a group of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)‐infected Brazilian patients and to investigate its association with biochemical, virological and molecular features. Methods: Sera from 43 patients positive for HBV core antibody and negative for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) were tested for HBV DNA positivity by semi‐nested PCR. HBV loads were assessed by real‐time PCR. S gene was cloned and sequenced for HBV isolates from 3 patients. HBsAg expression of these cases was performed in HuH7 cells. Results: HBV DNA was found in 6/43 (14%) samples, all except one associated with low viral loads. Occult HBV infection was further correlated with anti‐hepatitis C virus (anti‐HCV) antibodies positivity, but not with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevated levels. S gene sequences derived from three patients were determined. Two of them displayed mutations that may explain HBsAg negativity. In the first one, a stop codon mutation was found at position 216 in the C‐terminal end of HBsAg. In the second patient, E164D and I195M substitutions in HBsAg, associated with lamivudine‐resistance mutations in the polymerase were identified. As expected, all clones showing those mutations displayed undetectable or very low levels of HBsAg. Conclusion: Occult HBV infection was frequent in HIV‐infected patients, was not associated with ALT elevation but significantly correlated with HCV seropositivity. The low viremia and the detection of HBsAg mutants confirm that multifactorial mechanisms are involved in occult HBV infection. HBV molecular monitoring should be employed for an adequate management of HBV/HIV co‐infected patients.     

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus during interferon‐free therapy with daclatasvir and asunaprevir in patient with hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus co‐infection

Direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAA) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) are not effective for hepatitis B virus (HBV), which may be suggestive of reactivation of anti‐HBe hepatitis during interferon (IFN)‐free DAA therapy in HBV/HCV co‐infected patients with inactive HBV. A 69‐year‐old male patient was diagnosed with chronic hepatitis due to HBV/HCV co‐infection with serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) of 94 U/L, HCV RNA of 4.2 log IU/mL and HBV DNA of 2.5 log copies/mL. HCV was thought to be responsible for the hepatitis activity because of low level of HBV core‐related antigen (3.1 log U/mL). He was treated with combination therapy of daclatasvir and asunaprevir. Serum ALT gradually increased, and reached 237 U/L on day 43 in spite of undetectable HCV RNA. Serum HBV DNA was increasing to 7.0 log copies/mL at that time. The treatment was stopped due to suspicion of drug‐induced liver injury and/or HBV reactivation. Administration of entecavir reduced HBV DNA levels, followed by improvement in ALT levels. This report proposes that close monitoring of HBV DNA during the anti‐HCV DAA therapy and the commencement of anti‐HBV therapy with nucleoside analogs after the increase of HBV DNA should be considered in patients with HBV/HCV co‐infection.     

Treatment of hepatitis C virus carriers with persistently normal alanine aminotransferase levels with peginterferon α‐2a and ribavirin: a multicentric study

Background/Aims: To evaluate, in clinical practice, the efficacy and safety of combined antiviral treatment in hepatitis C virus (HCV) carriers with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. Methods: Eighty‐eight HCV carriers with persistently normal ALT levels were enrolled. All patients received peginterferon (PEG‐IFN) α‐2a 180 μg once weekly plus ribavirin (RBV) 800 mg/day for 24 weeks (HCV‐2 and ‐3) or 1000–1200 mg/day for 48 weeks (HCV‐1). Results: Rapid virological response (RVR) was seen in 66/88 patients (75%): 19/32 HCV‐1 (59%), 40/46 HCV‐2 (87%) and 7/10 HCV‐3 patients. Younger patients, leaner subjects and patients with non‐1 genotype or lower baseline HCV RNA levels were more likely to achieve an RVR. Sustained virological response (SVR) was seen in 69/88 patients (78%): 20/32 HCV‐1 patients (62%), 41/46 HCV‐2 patients (89%) and 8/10 (80%) HCV‐3 patients. The overall SVR rate was 88% in patients with RVR (58/66) and 50% in those without RVR. Conclusions: The combination of PEG‐IFN α‐2a and RBV produces, in patients with normal ALT, virological response rates that are comparable or even higher than those obtained in patients with elevated ALT levels. Thus, we suggest that in selected cases immediate therapy might be preferred to a ‘wait‐and‐see’ policy.     

De novo hepatitis B virus infection in hepatocellular carcinoma following eradication of hepatitis C virus by interferon therapy

Epidemiological studies have revealed that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still observed in hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐positive patients with a sustained response to interferon (IFN) treatment, although a substantial decrease in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been achieved in those patients. Why HCC develops in patients who have a complete clearance of HCV remains unclear. Here, we provided evidence of latent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in an initially HCV‐positive chronic hepatitis patient who developed HCC after the complete eradication of HCV by IFN therapy. Although he was initially negative for anti‐hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or circulating HBV DNA but positive for anti‐hepatitis B core antigen (anti‐HBc) in his sera, he developed HBsAg and HBV DNA during the course of the management of a series of cancers. HBV DNA was detectable in the liver tissues before HBV reactivation and the viral sequences derived from his anti‐HBc‐positive liver showed 100% homology to that from the serum after HBsAg appearance. These findings indicates that HCV‐positive individuals who are positive for anti‐HBc in the absence of HBsAg could have latent HBV infection in their liver tissues and intrahepatic HBV infection may play a pivotal role in the development of HCC after the IFN‐mediated eradication of HCV.     

Seroprevalence of occult hepatitis B among Egyptian paediatric hepatitis C cancer patients

Occult hepatitis B infection is characterized by the presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in the serum in the absence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in Egypt is among the highest in the world. In this study, we aim at analysing the rates of occult HBV infections among HCV paediatric cancer patients in Egypt. The prevalence of occult HBV was assessed in two groups of paediatric cancer patients (HCV positive and HCV negative), in addition to a third group of paediatric noncancer patients, which was used as a general control. All groups were negative for HBsAg and positive for HCV antibody. HBV DNA was detected by nested PCR and real‐time PCR. HCV was detected by real‐time PCR. Sequencing was carried out in order to determine HBV genotypes to all HBV patients as well as to detect any mutation that might be responsible for the occult phenotype. Occult hepatitis B infection was observed in neither the non‐HCV paediatric cancer patients nor the paediatric noncancer patients but was found in 31% of the HCV‐positive paediatric cancer patients. All the detected HBV patients belonged to HBV genotype D, and mutations were found in the surface genome of HBV leading to occult HBV. Occult HBV infection seems to be relatively frequent in HCV‐positive paediatric cancer patients, indicating that HBsAg negativity is not sufficient to completely exclude HBV infection. These findings emphasize the importance of considering occult HBV infection in HCV‐positive paediatric cancer patients especially in endemic areas as Egypt.     

Lack of association between occult hepatitis B virus DNA viral load and aminotransferase levels in patients with hepatitis C virus-related chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients might enhance the severity of chronic liver disease (CLD). To elucidate the correlation between occult HBV infection and the clinical course of HCV-related CLD, we evaluated whether the fluctuation of occult HBV-DNA directly affects the serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level. METHODS: Forty-one patients with HCV-related CLD who received regular outpatient treatment and 42 age-, sex-, and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen positivity-matched healthy volunteers were enrolled. Serum HBV-DNA was quantitatively detected using real-time detection polymerase chain reaction (RTD-PCR). Serial serum samples in three patients were measured for HBV-DNA, ALT and HCV core antigen. RESULTS: Hepatitis B virus DNA was amplified in eight of the HCV-related CLD patients (19.5%), which was significantly higher than that of healthy volunteers (2.4%). No significant difference between the genotype 1 HCV-related CLD group and the genotype 2 group was found. Based on the analyses using serial serum samples, the elevation of HBV-DNA did not occur before the ALT flares, but occurred at the same time or after the ALT flares. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of occult HBV infection of HCV-related CLD is significantly higher than that of control. Occult HBV infection has no influence on ALT flares among patients with HCV-related CLD.     

Drug‐induced liver injury in a chronic hepatitis C patient treated by peginterferon,ribavirin and simeprevir

A 56‐year‐old male patient with chronic hepatitis C was treated with pegylated interferon (PEG IFN)‐α‐2b and ribavirin (RBV) for 72 weeks in 2006. The patient achieved an early virological response (EVR); however, hepatitis C relapsed 12 weeks after discontinuation of PEG IFN and RBV. In 2012, the patient was treated with a PEG IFN/RBV/telaprevir combination therapy. After 5 days of treatment, he suffered from a telaprevir‐associated skin rash on his body and four limbs. He chose to be treated with PEG IFN and RBV until 60 weeks. He again achieved EVR but no sustained virological response. In 2014, he was treated with PEG IFN/RBV/simeprevir combination therapy. He achieved rapid virological response, but after 6 weeks of therapy, a striking elevation of serum aminotransferase level was recorded with no accompanying skin rash; he was admitted to our hospital. PEG IFN/RBV/simeprevir was stopped, but sodium valproate (400 mg/day), which had been administrated for more than 10 years to prevent epilepsy was continued. Liver biopsy revealed typical features of drug‐induced liver injury. After stopping PEG IFN/RBV/simeprevir, serum aminotransferase levels soon returned to the normal range. We diagnosed this case to be simeprevir‐induced hepatitis clinically and histologically. Physicians need to stay alert to the possibility of drug‐induced liver injury in using simeprevir.     

Current therapy for hepatitis C or D or immunodeficiency virus concurrent infection with chronic hepatitis B

Concurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis delta virus (HDV), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) appears to increase the risk of progressive liver disease including liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. There is a 10% prevalence of HCV infection in chronic HBV or HDV infection. Serological evidence of previous exposure to HBV is found in more than 80% of HIV-positive patients in the high risk group. Notably, the most recently acquired virus tends to suppress the pre-existing virus. In chronic HBV infection acquired perinatally or in early childhood, usually HCV is dominant and may suppress or even displace HBV and HDV. Less frequently, HBV or HDV suppresses HCV. It is generally agreed that the dominant virus should be identified in order to make appropriate treatment decisions. Studies with standard interferon (IFN) to treat patients with HCV dominantly dual HBV/HCV infection have showed only limited virological response. But high dose of IFN has been demonstrated with better response rate. Combined ribavirin with standard or pegylated IFN therapy could achieve a sustained HCV clearance rate comparable with those infected with HCV alone. On the contrary, patients with HBV dominantly dual viral infection might indicate more appropriate addition of lamivudine to IFN than ribavirin. Additionally, patients with concurrent infection of HBV and HDV, IFN seems to be the only effective agent. However, the efficacy of IFN is related to the dose. High dose of IFN [9 MU tiw (thrice per week)] and longer treatment duration (at least 2 years) have been shown to achieve adequate virological response. In patients with concurrently infected HBV and HIV, anti-HBV therapy should be considered for all patients with evidence of liver disease, irrespective of the CD4 cell count. In patients not requiring antiretroviral therapy, HBV therapy should be preferentially based on IFN, adefovir, or telbivudine. In contrast, in patients with CD4 cell counts <350 cells/μl or those already on antiretroviral therapy, agents with double anti-HBV and anti-HIV activity are preferred. At present, the evidence of therapeutic efficacy is not sufficient to make a recommendation in treating patients with dual HBV/HCV or HBV/HDV or HBV/HIV infection. Further studies of the well-designed, larger scale are needed to elucidate the role of different regimens or combination in the treatment of dual viral infection.     

Comparison between quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen,hepatitis B e‐antigen and hepatitis B virus DNA levels for predicting virological response to pegylated interferon‐α‐2b therapy in hepatitis B e‐antigen‐positive chronic hepatitis B

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical applicability of quantitative serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA for predicting virological response (VR) to pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN) therapy. Methods: Thirty HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B patients who received PEG‐IFN‐α‐2b for 48 weeks were enrolled. Quantitative HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA were measured before, during and after the therapy. Paired liver biopsies were performed before and after treatment for covalently closed circular (ccc)DNA and intrahepatic HBV DNA analysis. Results: VR at 48 weeks post‐treatment, defined as HBeAg seroconversion and HBV DNA less than 10 000 copies/mL was achieved in 10 (33.3%) patients. Responders had significantly lower baseline HBsAg, HBeAg, cccDNA and intrahepatic HBV DNA levels than non‐responders. Baseline and reduced levels of log₁₀ HBsAg and log₁₀ HBeAg correlated well with those of log₁₀ cccDNA and log₁₀ total intrahepatic HBV DNA. Responders showed consistent decrease in serum HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA levels during therapy. HBeAg level of 2.0 log₁₀ sample to cut‐off ratio at week 24 on therapy provided the best prediction of sustained virological response, with sensitivity and negative predictive values of 85% and 92%, respectively. One patient (3.3%) who cleared HBsAg at follow up exhibited a more rapid decline in serum HBsAg during therapy than those who developed VR without HBsAg clearance. Conclusion: Quantitative measurement of serum HBeAg during therapy may be superior to serum HBsAg and HBV DNA as a prediction of HBeAg seroconversion. Kinetics of HBsAg levels on therapy may help predict HBsAg clearance after treatment.     

Treatment of patients with dual hepatitis C virus and hepatitis B virus infection: Resolved and unresolved issues

Dual hepatitis C virus (HCV)/hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is not uncommon in HCV or HBV endemic areas and among subjects at risk of parenteral transmission. In patients dually infected with hepatitis C and B, the disease manifestations are usually more severe than those with either virus infection. In the past decade, the following issues have been resolved. In dually infected patients with active hepatitis C, combined pegylated interferon alfa plus ribavirin was effective, the treatment outcomes being similar to patients with HCV monoinfection. During long‐term follow‐up, the HCV response was sustained in around 97% of patients; and the long‐term outcomes including the development of hepatocellular carcinoma and liver‐related mortality were improved. However, several clinical issues remain to be resolved. First, host and viral factors influencing the long‐term outcomes and treatment options in patients with dual HCV/HBV infection await further studies. Second, about 60% of dually infected patients with baseline undetectable serum HBV DNA levels develop HBV reactivation after the start of treatment. How to prevent and treat HBV reactivation should be clarified. Third, about 30% of dually infected patients lose hepatitis B surface antigen at 5 years after the end of combination therapy; the mechanisms need further investigations. Fourth, the optimal treatment strategies for dually infected patients with active hepatitis B or established cirrhosis should be explored in future clinical trials. Finally, the role of new direct‐acting antiviral‐based therapy for the treatment of patients with dual HCV/HBV infection also remains to be evaluated.     

Role of IL28B for chronic hepatitis C treatment toward personalized medicine

Genome‐wide association studies recently revealed that certain interleukin‐28B (IL28B) polymorphisms are strongly associated with responses to pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy in patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1, as well as with spontaneous clearance of HCV. Subsequent reports revealed that IL28B genotypes also affect treatment efficacy in chronic infection with other HCV genotypes. Furthermore, there have been several reports that implicate IL28B genotypes in inflammatory status, progression of fibrosis and adverse clinical outcomes in chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Therapy of CHC recently entered a new era with the deployment of direct‐acting antivirals. These include nonstructural 3/4A protease inhibitors which have shown promise in combination with PEG‐IFN/RBV in several clinical trials. IFN‐free therapy is expected to be useful especially in IFN‐resistant patients and may become the standard of care in the future. Several clinical trials have revealed an association between IL28B genotype and treatment efficacy in triple therapy or IFN‐free regimens. On the other hand the mechanism of the effect of IL28B on HCV infection has not yet been elucidated. Recently, it was shown that the polymorphism of IFN‐lambda 4 (IFNL4) is in high linkage disequilibrium with that of near IL28B, and more strongly associated with spontaneous or treatment‐induced HCV clearance than IL28B genotypes, especially in individuals of African ancestry. This finding provides new insights into the genetic regulation of HCV clearance and its clinical management. IL28B genotyping will be also useful for personalized CHC treatment in the forthcoming era of direct‐acting antivirals.     

Hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus coinfection: epidemiology, clinical features, viral interactions and treatment

Because of the shared modes of transmission, hepatitis B virus (HBV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection is not uncommon in highly endemic areas and among subjects with a high risk of parenteral infections. The worldwide prevalence of HBV/HCV coinfection is unknown and might be underestimated with the phenomenon of silent (occult) HBV infection. HCV superinfection in patients with chronic HBV infection was the most common clinical features of coinfection in Asia-Pacific countries. Further, most, but not all, clinical observations suggested that interference between the two viruses was more frequently characterized by an inhibition of HBV replication exerted by HCV. However, longitudinal follow-up studies have demonstrated that the virological patterns in coinfection cases are widely divergent and have dynamic profiles over time. As compared with monoinfected patients, HBV/HCV coinfected persons tend to have more severe liver injury, a higher probability of liver cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation, and a higher incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Detailed serological and virological evaluations are required for coinfected patients before initiation of antiviral therapy. Previous studies demonstrated that HBV/HCV coinfected patients responded poorly to interferon (IFN) monotherapy. Currently, for patients with dominant HCV infection and low level HBV viremia (<10(4) IU/mL), IFN or pegylated IFN plus ribavirin can achieve comparable sustained virus response as expected with HCV monoinfection. However, phenomenon of reciprocal viral interference can happen, and resultant "flare" of hepatitis activity may cause liver function deterioration. For coinfected patients with dually-active HBV/HCV, the optimal regimen for therapy remains unclear although adding oral nucleos(t)ide analogs to pegylated IFN and ribavirin seems a reasonable empiric option.     

The impact of hepatitis C virus outside the liver: Evidence from Asia

Between 80 and 115 million people worldwide are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus, with 60%‐90% of these being undiagnosed. Untreated chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is associated with progressive liver disease, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver‐related mortality. A number of extrahepatic manifestations are also reported in CHC patients, further adding to the burden of the disease. CHC also impacts patients in terms of lower health‐related quality of life, higher levels of fatigue and reduced productivity. Furthermore, the later stages of disease are costly for both healthcare systems and society. Pegylated‐interferon (PEG‐IFN)+ribavirin (RBV), for many years the mainstay of treatment, leads to sustained virological response (SVR) in 40%‐70% of patients. However, a substantial number of patients are ineligible for treatment, and many patients fail to achieve SVR with this regimen. Furthermore, PEG‐IFN+RBV leads to impairment of patient‐reported outcomes during treatment, and most patients suffer from adverse events, associated with poor adherence, treatment discontinuation and treatment failure. The approval of second‐generation direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) has revolutionized the treatment of CHC patients. All‐oral, PEG‐IFN and RBV‐free regimens have higher efficacy rates, shorter treatment durations, fewer adverse events, higher adherence rates and improvement in PROs from as early as Week 4, compared to PEG‐IFN+RBV regimens. The aim of this article is to review the evidence for HCV infection as a systemic disease, summarizing the impact of hepatitis C and its treatments on clinical, patient and economic outcomes, with a focus on data from Asia and Japan specifically.     

Eradication of hepatitis C virus could improve immunological status and pyoderma gangrenosum‐like lesions

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) can affect immune cells and induce various kinds of immune‐related diseases including pyoderma gangrenosum. We experienced a difficult‐to‐treat case of pyoderma gangrenosum‐like lesions in a patient with HCV infection. The patient was treated with pegylated interferon (PEG IFN)‐α‐2b and ribavirin (RBV) therapy and achieved a sustained virological response. Before the eradication of HCV, the frequency of T‐helper 17 cells was remarkably high in comparison to chronic hepatitis C patients without extrahepatic immune‐related diseases. Moreover, we could detect negative and positive strand‐specific HCV RNA in the CD19⁺ B lymphocytes and CD4⁺ T lymphocytes. However, after the eradication of HCV, the immunological status became normal and the pyoderma gangrenosum‐like lesions became stable without immunosuppressive therapy. Here, we report a sequential immunological analysis during PEG IFN/RBV therapy and the beneficial effect of HCV eradication in difficult‐to‐treat pyoderma gangrenosum‐like lesions.     

Sustained virological response of patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 2 depends on pegylated interferon compliance

Aim: Patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 are more sensitive to interferon (IFN) therapy than those infected with genotype 1, but 10–20% of patients do not achieve a sustained viral response (SVR) to combination therapy with pegylated (PEG) IFN and ribavirin (RBV). This study examines the prognostic factors associated with SVR in patients infected with HCV genotype 2 treated with PEG IFN and RBV. Methods: We treated 149 patients with chronic hepatitis C caused by HCV genotype 2. The patients received s.c. PEG IFN‐α‐2b (1.5 µg/kg) and a weekly weight‐adjusted dose of RBV (600, 800 and 1000 mg per <60, 60–80 and >80 kg, respectively) for 24 weeks and then prognostic factors associated with the SVR were examined. Results: Among the 149 patients, 138 completed the combination therapy and a sustained viral response was achieved in 71.8% of them. Univariate analysis showed that age, as well as mean RBV and PEG IFN doses were factors affecting the SVR (P = 0.012, =0.021, =0.014). Multivariate analysis identified age and mean PEG IFN dose (P = 0.021, =0.018, respectively) as factors involved in the SVR, but not mean RBV dose. Conclusion: The SVR of patients infected with HCV genotype 2 depended on the dosage of PEG IFN, but not of RBV. Selecting sufficient doses of PEG IFN for combination with RBV is critical for treating such patients.     

隐匿性乙型肝炎病毒感染的检测及临床特点分析

研究不明原因性肝炎患者中隐匿性乙型肝炎病毒（HBV）感染的巢式聚合酶链式反应（PCR）检测及HBV隐匿性感染的临床特点。不明原因性肝炎患者104例,收集临床资料及血清。HBV基因组S、X、C区分别设计2套巢式引物,比较扩增效率,挑选扩增效率高的引物巢式PCR扩增,检测出隐匿性HBV感染者。隐匿性HBV感染者与其它不明原因肝病患者易感因素、临床症状、体征、生化检查、影像学检查等方面比较分析。检测出隐匿性HBV感染13例。隐匿性HBV感染者较其它不明原因肝病患者年龄大,多为中老年患者,并且肝硬化比例明显高于后者。本组不明原因性肝炎患者中约有12.5%为隐匿性HBV感染。HBV隐匿性感染导致肝脏炎症,甚至肝硬化。     

Role of occult hepatitis B virus infection in chronic hepatitis C

The development of sensitive assays to detect small amounts of hepatitis B virus(HBV) DNA has favored the identification of occult hepatitis B infection(OBI), a virological condition characterized by a low level of HBV replication with detectable levels of HBV DNA in liver tissue but an absence of detectable surface antigen of HBV(HBs Ag) in serum. The gold standard to diagnose OBI is the detection of HBV DNA in the hepatocytes by highly sensitive and specific techniques, a diagnostic procedure requiring liver tissue to be tested and the use of non-standardized non-commercially available techniques. Consequently, in everyday clinical practice, the detection of anti-hepatitis B core antibody(antiHBc) in serum of HBs Ag-negative subjects is used as a surrogate marker to identify patients with OBI. In patients with chronic hepatitis C(CHC), OBI has been identified in nearly one-third of these cases. Considerable data suggest that OBI favors the increase of liver damage and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) in patients with CHC. The data from other studies, however, indicate no influence of OBI on the natural history of CHC, particularly regarding the risk of developing HCC.     

New perspectives in occult hepatitis C virus infection

Occult hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, defined as the presence of HCV RNA in liver and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in the absence of detectable viral RNA in serum by standard assays, can be found in anti-HCV positive patients with normal serum levels of liver enzymes and in anti-HCV negative patients with persistently elevated liver enzymes of unknown etiology. Occult HCV infection is distributed worldwide and all HCV genotypes seem to be involved in this infection. Occult hepatitis C has been found not only in anti-HCV positive subjects with normal values of liver enzymes or in chronic hepatitis of unknown origin but also in several groups at risk for HCV infection such as hemodialysis patients or family members of patients with occult HCV. This occult infection has been reported also in healthy populations without evidence of liver disease. Occult HCV infection seems to be less aggressive than chronic hepatitis C although patients affected by occult HCV may develop liver cirrhosis and even hepatocellular carcinoma. Thus, anti-HCV negative patients with occult HCV may benefit from antiviral therapy with pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin. The persistence of very low levels of HCV RNA in serum and in PBMCs, along with the maintenance of specific T-cell responses against HCV-antigens observed during a long-term follow-up of patients with occult hepatitis C, indicate that occult HCV is a persistent infection that is not spontaneously eradicated. This is an updated report on diagnosis, epidemiology and clinical implications of occult HCV with special emphasis on anti-HCV negative cases.