Influence of tegaserod on proximal gastric tone and on the perception of gastric distention in functional dyspepsia

Background Abnormalities in gastric sensorimotor function (hypersensitivity to distention and impaired meal accommodation) have been implicated in the pathophysiology of functional dyspepsia (FD). To study the effect of the 5‐HT₄ agonist tegaserod on sensitivity to gastric distention and gastric accommodation in FD. Methods Thirty FD patients (7 males, mean age 42 ± 2 years) underwent a gastric barostat study on two separate occasions, 2 weeks apart, after 5 days of pretreatment with placebo or tegaserod 6 mg b.i.d. in a double‐blind randomized order. After introduction of the barostat bag, graded isobaric distentions (2 mmHg increments/2 min) were performed to determine gastric compliance and sensitivity to distention. Subsequently, the pressure level was set at intra‐abdominal pressure [minimal distending pressure (MDP)] + 2 mmHg for 90 min, with administration of a liquid meal (200 mL; 300 kcal) after 30 min. Key Results Tegaserod had no influence on MDP (7.9 ± 0.4 vs 7.4 ± 0.4 mmHg) or fasting gastric compliance (44 ± 10 vs 61 ± 6 mL mmHg^?1) and on fasting thresholds for first perception (3.6 ± 0.4 vs 4.2 ± 0.2 mmHg above MDP) or discomfort (9.9 ± 0.7 vs 10.5 ± 0.5 mmHg above MDP). Tegaserod did not alter intra‐balloon volumes before and after the meal [respectively 146 ± 14 vs 120 ± 11 and 297 ± 28 vs 283 ± 29 mL, not significant (NS)], or the amplitude of the meal‐induced gastric relaxation (151 ± 23 vs 162 ± 23 mL, NS). In the subgroup with normal gastric emptying (n = 22), tegaserod significantly enhanced meal‐induced accommodation (126 ± 23 vs 175 ± 29 mL, anova P < 0.001). Conclusions & Inferences Tegaserod does not alter gastric sensorimotor function in FD patients as a group. In the subgroup with normal gastric emptying, tegaserod 6 mg b.i.d enhanced gastric accommodation.     

Influence of the 5‐HT3 receptor antagonist ondansetron on gastric sensorimotor function and nutrient tolerance in healthy volunteers

Background Serotonin is believed to be involved in the regulation of the gastric accommodation reflex in man however which receptor subtype(s) are involved remains to be elucidated. Methods Eleven healthy subjects (nine men, age 19–30) underwent a gastric barostat and a drinking test after treatment with either placebo or ondansetron (8 mg intravenously). During the barostat protocol an intragastric flaccid bag was stepwise distended (2 mmHg increments 2 min) to determine gastric compliance and sensitivity to distention. Subsequently, the pressure level was set at intra‐abdominal pressure +2 mmHg while volume was followed before and after administration of a liquid meal (200 mL; 300 kcal). During the drink test volunteers drank at a rate of 15 mL min^?1 until maximal satiation. Results (mean ± SEM) were compared using t‐tests and mixed model analysis. Key Results Gastric compliance was not significantly altered by ondansetron (51.5 ± 5.6 vs 49.2 ± 5.2 mL mmHg^?1), neither were the pressure thresholds for first perception or discomfort. Ondansetron treatment did not affect basal gastric tone (173 ± 14 vs 156 ± 12 mL), neither did it affect the amplitude of the meal‐induced relaxation (160 ± 52 vs 131 ± 43 mL) or the maximum volume increase after the meal (264 ± 54 mL vs 234 ± 51 mL). During the drinking test the amount of liquid meal ingested at maximum satiation was significantly increased by ondansetron (784 ± 74 vs 907 ± 64 mL, P < 0.05). Conclusions & Inferences These data suggest that 5‐HT acting at 5‐HT₃ receptors is not involved in the control of gastric sensorimotor function, but contributes to the regulation of hunger and satiation in man.     

Role of endogenous opioids in the control of gastric sensorimotor function

Abstract Endogenous opioids have been implicated not only in the process of feeding but also in the control of gastric sensitivity and gastric motor responses, and impairment of antinociceptive opioid pathways has been hypothesized to contribute to the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia. Our aim was to study the effect of suppression of endogenous opioid action by naloxone on gastric sensorimotor function in healthy volunteers. During intravenous administration of saline or naloxone (0.4 mg intravenous bolus followed by continuous infusion 20 μg kg^?1 h^?1), sensitivity to gastric distension, gastric accommodation and fundic phasic contractility were evaluated by barostat in 15 subjects. Nutrient tolerance and meal‐related symptoms were assessed using a satiety drinking test (n = 13), and solid and liquid gastric emptying were evaluated by breath test (n = 14). Naloxone did not influence gastric compliance and sensitivity. No effect on preprandial gastric tone was found but meal‐induced accommodation was significantly inhibited by naloxone (P = 0.031). Subjects receiving naloxone demonstrated a higher motility index before (20.8 ± 2.4 vs 28.0 ± 1.9 mL s^?1, P = 0.007) and after (15.2 ± 2.0 vs 22.7 ± 1.5 mL s^?1, P = 0.0006) the meal. Naloxone significantly decreased the amount of food ingested at maximum satiety (715.4 ± 77.7 vs 617.3 ± 61.3 mL, P = 0.03). No effect of naloxone on gastric emptying was observed and intensity of postprandial symptoms was unchanged. These observations suggest that endogenous opioids are involved in the control of gastric accommodation and phasic contractility but not in the control of sensitivity to gastric distension or gastric emptying in healthy volunteers.     

Effect of mianserin on gastric sensorimotor function and gastric emptying: a randomized,placebo‐controlled,double‐blind,crossover study in healthy volunteers

Background Antidepressants such as mianserin can improve symptoms in some functional dyspeptic patients but their mechanism of action remains unclear. We aimed to assess the effects of mianserin on gastric sensorimotor function in man. Methods In this randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, crossover study 12 healthy subjects (six men) underwent a gastric barostat study and a gastric emptying breath test after 7 days pretreatment with placebo or mianserin (20 mg; p.o.). Graded isobaric and isovolumetric distentions were performed to determine gastric compliance and sensitivity. Subsequently, intrabag pressure was held constant and the volume increase after administration of a liquid meal (200 mL; 300 kcal) was studied. Breath was sampled before and after ingestion of a test meal and half‐emptying times for solids and liquids were determined from the breath samples. Mianserin was compared to placebo using t‐tests and mixed model analysis (mean ± SD). Key Results Mianserin did not affect pressures or volumes needed to induce first perception or discomfort. During isovolumetric distensions compliance was decreased after mianserin treatment (1.8 ± 0.4 vs 2.0 ± 0.3 mmHg 100 mL^?1; P < 0.05). Premeal volumes were comparable in both treatment arms (221 ± 99 vs 220 ± 88 mL), but meal‐induced relaxation during the first 30 min was significantly inhibited after mianserin treatment (F_6,40 = 2.58, P < 0.05). Mianserin did not affect either solid or liquid gastric emptying. Conclusions & Inferences Mianserin does not alter gastric emptying rate or sensitivity to gastric distension, but inhibits gastric accommodation to a meal in its early phase. These observations provide no explanation for the effects of mianserin in functional dyspeptic patients.     

Characterization of gastric volume responses and liquid emptying in functional dyspepsia and health by MRI or barostat and simultaneous 13C-acetate breath test

Abstract The assessment of gastric accommodation and emptying by different methodologies provides inconsistent results. We aimed to compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), barostat and ¹³C‐acetate breath test (BT) for the assessment of gastric volume responses and emptying in healthy controls (HC) and patients with functional dyspepsia (FD). Eight HC and eight FD patients underwent: (i) continuous BT with simultaneous MRI in the upright position after ingestion of isocaloric, 300 kcal, 200 and 800 mL meals, both labelled with 100 mg of ¹³C‐acetate; and (ii) BT with gastric barostat after ingestion of the 200 mL meal. MRI measured total gastric volume and gastric content volume (GCV) at baseline, after filling and during emptying. Meal emptying half‐times (T½) for MRI and BT were calculated (mean ± SD). We found: (i) Initial GCV was lower in FD than in HC (762 ± 22 vs 810 ± 52 mL, P < 0.04) after the 800 mL meal but not the 200 mL meal. T½_MRI was shorter for the 800 mL than the 200 mL meal (P < 0.001), but similar in HC and FD (200 mL: HC 117 ± 30 min vs FD 138 ± 42 min, ns; 800 mL: HC 71 ± 16 min vs FD 78 ± 27 min, ns). In contrast, T½_BT was similar between meals and groups (200 mL: HC 111 ± 11 min vs FD 116 ± 19 min; 800 mL: HC 114 ± 14 min vs FD: 113 ± 17 min). (ii) Barostat measurements showed similar postprandial volume increases between groups. We conclude that direct measurements by MRI provide a sensitive, non‐invasive assessment of gastric accommodation and emptying after a meal. In contrast to MRI, BT did not detect faster emptying of high‐volume compared to low‐volume liquid nutrient meals in HC or FD.     

The effects of fasting duration on gastric emptying in man,an exploration of the role of the endocannabinoid system and inter‐individual responsiveness

Background In animal studies, gut vagal afferent neurons express cannabinoid (CB1) receptors, whose expression is increased by fasting. We aimed to explore the possibility that similar effects might be relevant in man in controlling gastric emptying. Methods Fourteen healthy volunteers underwent measurements of gastric emptying using the ¹³C acetate breath test, after either a nutrient (skimmed milk) or non‐nutrient (water) meal following both a 12 and 24 h fast. Further gastric emptying studies were performed with and without the CB1 receptor antagonist Rimonabant (20 mg or 80 mg). Because of the inter‐individual variations observed, two subjects underwent additional studies with and without Rimonabant to determine intra‐individual consistency. Gastric emptying was evaluated as cumulative C13 : C12 ratio values, measured at 5 min intervals for 30 min. Key Results In the group as a whole, fasting duration slowed gastric emptying for both the nutrient [120 ± 30 (mean ± SD) vs 101 ± 34, P < 0.05] and non‐nutrient [226 ± 62 vs 177 ± 47, P < 0.05] meals, but there was no effect of Rimonabant. However, there was consistent inter individual variation; thus while 12 subjects showed a slowing, two (14%) exhibited accelerated gastric emptying for both the nutrient and the non‐nutrient meal after 24 h fasting and in one of whom, Rimonabant consistently reversed the fasting effect on the non‐nutrient meal. Conclusions & Inferences Extended fasting alters the gastric emptying of liquid meals but there are consistent differences between individuals. Where there is an accelerated response to fasting, Rimonabant appears to reverse the effect.     

The nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, Ng-nitro-l-arginine-methyl-ester, attenuates the delay in gastric emptying induced by hyperglycaemia in healthy humans

Abstract The aim of this study was to determine whether the nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor, N^g‐nitro‐l ‐arginine‐methyl‐ester (l ‐NAME), reverses the effects of acute hyperglycaemia on gastric emptying and antropyloroduodenal (APD) motility. The study had a four‐way randomized crossover (hyperglycaemia vs euglycaemia; l ‐NAME vs placebo) design in a clinical laboratory setting. Seven healthy volunteers [four males; age 30.3 ± 3.8 years; body mass index (BMI) 23.6 ± 1.2 kg m^?2] were the study subjects. After positioning a transnasal manometry catheter across the pylorus, the blood glucose concentration was maintained at either 15 or 5 mmol L^?1 using a glucose/insulin clamp. An intravenous infusion of l ‐NAME (180 μg kg^?1 h^?1) or placebo (0.9% saline) was commenced (T = ?30 min) and continued for 150 min. At T = ?2 min, subjects ingested a drink containing 50 g of glucose made up to 300 mL with water. Gastric emptying was measured using 3D ultrasound, and APD motility using manometry. Hyperglycaemia slowed gastric emptying (P < 0.05), and this effect was abolished by l ‐NAME. l ‐NAME had no effect on gastric emptying during euglycaemia. Hyperglycaemia suppressed fasting antral motility [motility index: 3.9 ± 0.8 (hyperglycaemia) vs 6.5 ± 0.6 (euglycaemia); P < 0.01]; l ‐NAME suppressed postprandial antral motility [motility index: 3.6 ± 0.2 (l ‐NAME) vs 5.1 ± 0.2 (placebo); P < 0.001]. Postprandial basal pyloric pressure was higher during hyperglycaemia (P < 0.001), and lower after administration of l ‐NAME (P < 0.001). Slowing of gastric emptying induced by hyperglycaemia is mediated by NO, and may involve the modulation of tonic pyloric activity.     

Influence of experimentally induced anxiety on rectal sensorimotor function in healthy humans

Abstract Psychological processes, especially anxiety, may have an influence on visceral perception and gastrointestinal (GI) motor function, thereby eliciting or aggravating GI symptoms. Anxiety has been shown to affect gastric sensorimotor function but it is conceivable that anxiety affects not only the stomach but also other parts of the GI tract, such as the rectum. The aim of this study was to investigate whether experimentally induced anxiety would alter rectal sensorimotor function in health. Eighteen healthy subjects (mean age 26.97 ± 1.75 years) underwent a rectal barostat study. To assess sensitivity to rectal distension and rectal compliance, stepwise isobaric distension was performed during anxious and neutral emotional state. Two methods of emotion induction were used simultaneously: audiotape assisted recall of a neutral or anxious autobiographical experience and viewing of a set of validated neutral or fearful facial expressions. Anxiety levels were assessed by means of the Spielberger State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and anxiety scores on a Likert scale. Anxiety scores (AUC: 2.11 ± 1.45 vs 42.78 ± 6.17 mm mmHg, P < 0.0001) and STAI scores (36.06 ± 2.09 vs 45.56 ± 2.52, P = 0.005) confirmed the efficacy of anxiety induction. Rectal compliance was not different during anxious compared with neutral emotional state (11.62 ± 0.93 vs 10.61 ± 0.96 mL mmHg^?1, P = NS). Pressure and volume thresholds inducing discomfort during rectal distension were not significantly different during anxious and neutral emotional state (29.33 ± 1.41 vs 29.78 ± 1.49 mmHg, P = NS and 249.26 ± 16.22 vs 231.38 ± 21.19 mL, P = NS respectively). Contrary to its influence on gastric sensorimotor function, experimentally induced anxiety does not affect rectal sensitivity or rectal compliance in healthy subjects.     

Intragastric pressure as a determinant of food intake

Background Different studies indicated a correlation between intragastric pressure (IGP) and satiation. Our aim was to investigate this correlation while artificially increasing the IGP. Methods In 12 fasted healthy volunteers an infusion catheter and a manometry probe were positioned intragastrically. Intragastric pressure was increased using a custom‐made belt before or progressively during intragastric nutrient infusion. Nutrient drink (1.5 kcal mL^?1) was intragastrically infused at 60 mL min^?1. The subjects scored satiation using a 6‐point Likert scale until maximum, when the infusion ended and the belt was released. Results are presented as mean ± S.E.M. and compared using a paired t‐test. Key Results When the belt was tightened before the nutrient infusion, fasting IGP was significantly increased (13.6 ± 1.3 vs 9.6 ± 0.9 mmHg; P < 0.05) but no differences in satiation could be observed. When progressively tightening the belt during nutrient infusion the IGP increased with 0.43 ± 0.04 mmHg per minute while in control experiments this was 0.28 ± 0.05 mmHg per minute (P < 0.01). During the latter experiment satiation linearly increased with 0.35 ± 0.03 and 0.29 ± 0.02 units per minute until maximal satiation (P < 0.01) while maximum volume consumed was 926 ± 66 and 1095 ± 82 mL when progressively increasing the IGP vs control respectively (P < 0.01). Conclusions & Inferences These findings indicate that IGP per se does not affect satiation but that a gradual IGP increase during food intake is associated with decreased food intake, indicating that gastric accommodation is an important determinant of food intake.     

The effect of gastric secretion on gastric physiology and emptying in the fasted and fed state assessed by magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract Conventional measurement of gastric secretion is invasive and cannot assess the intra‐gastric distribution of gastric contents or the effects of secretion on gastric function. This study assessed the effect of gastric secretion on gastric volume responses and emptying (GE) using a validated fast T₁ mapping magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique. Twelve healthy participants were studied in the fasted state and after 200 kcal Gadolinium‐DOTA labelled glucose meal during intravenous infusion of pentagastrin or placebo in double‐blind, randomized order. Total gastric volume (TGV) and gastric content volume (GCV) was assessed by MRI volume scans and secretion by fast T₁ mapping. Data was described by the κ‐coefficient (volume change after meal ingestion), by GE half time (T₅₀) and maximal GE rate (GER_max) derived all from a GE model. Pentagastrin increased GCV and TGV compared to placebo [κ(GCV):1.6 ± 0.1 vs 0.6 ± 0.1; κ(TGV): 1.6 ± 0.1 vs 0.7 ± 0.1; P < 0.001]. T₁ maps revealed a secretion layer above the meal, the volume of which was associated with κ (R² = 83%, P < 0.001). TGV and GCV change were similar in both conditions (κ; P = ns). T₅₀ was higher for pentagastrin than for placebo (84 ± 7 vs 56 ± 4min, P < 0.001); however, GER_max was similar (5.9 ± 0.6 vs 4.9 ± 0.4 mL min^?1, P = ns). This study shows volume and distribution of gastric secretion can be quantified in‐vivo by non‐invasive MRI T₁ mapping. Increased GCV drove TGV accommodation without evidence of a direct effect of pentagastrin or excess acid on gastric function. Secretion increases GCV thus prolongs GE as assessed by T₅₀; however, GE rate is unchanged.     

Assessment of symptoms during gastric emptying scintigraphy to correlate symptoms to delayed gastric emptying

Background Symptoms of gastroparesis based on patient recall correlate poorly with gastric emptying. The aim of this study is to determine if symptoms recorded during gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) correlate with gastric emptying and with symptoms based on patient recall. Methods Patients undergoing GES completed the Patient Assessment of GI Symptoms (PAGI‐SYM) assessing symptoms over the prior 2 weeks and a questionnaire for which patients graded six symptoms during GES. A Symptom Severity Index (SSI) represented the mean of six symptoms at each time point. Key Results A total of 560 patients underwent GES for clinical evaluation of symptoms. Of 388 patients included in the study: 232 patients had normal GES (NGES), 156 delayed GES (DGES), and 11 rapid GES (RGES). Symptom severity index increased pre to postprandial for each group: NGES: 0.51 ± 0.07 to 0.92 ± 0.03, DGES: 0.60 ± 0.09 to 1.13 ± 0.05, and RGES: 0.56 ± 0.12 to 0.79 ± 0.13. Delayed gastric emptying scintigraphy patients had a higher postprandial SSI than NGES patients (1.13 ± 0.05 vs 0.92 ± 0.03, P < 0.05). Postprandial symptoms of stomach fullness (1.9 ± 0.12 vs 1.5 ± 0.09; P = 0.011), bloating (1.4 ± 0.11 vs 1.1 ± 0.09; P = 0.033), and abdominal pain (1.1 ± 0.08 vs 0.7 ± 0.12; P = 0.012) were higher in DGES than NGES. Symptom severity based on PAGI‐SYM for 2 weeks prior to GES correlated with symptoms during the test for nausea (NGES, r = 0.61; DGES, r = 0.70), stomach fullness (NGES, r = 0.47; DGES, r = 0.60), and bloating (NGES, r = 0.62, DGES, r = 0.66). Conclusions & Inferences Stomach fullness, bloating, and abdominal pain recorded during GES were higher in patients with delayed gastric emptying than in patients with normal gastric emptying. Symptoms recorded during GES correlated with those during daily life by patient recall.     

Influence of sumatriptan on gastric accommodation and on antral contraction in healthy subjects assessed by ultrasonography

Background Oral sumatriptan administration has been reported to delay gastric emptying after liquid meals. The aim of this study was to determine whether delayed gastric emptying is caused by enhanced gastric accommodation, impaired antral contractions, or both using ultrasonography. Methods Ten healthy volunteers were enrolled in this randomized two‐way crossover study. After overnight fasting, the subjects received the liquid meal 60 min after ingesting a 50 mg sumatriptan tablet with 50 mL of water or 50 mL of water alone (control). The cross‐sectional area of the proximal stomach was measured in a supine position after every 100 mL. The frequency and amplitude of the antral contractions were measured in a slightly backward sitting position. The intragastric distribution of the liquid meal was assessed by calculating the proximal stomach/distal stomach ratio (prox/distal ratio). Key Results The cross‐sectional area after drinking 100, 200, and 300 mL of the liquid meal (oral sumatriptan vs control) was 34.49 vs 15.11 cm² (P = 0.0051), 48.00 vs 30.61 cm² (P = 0.0166), and 58.67 vs 47.19 cm² (P = 0.0125), respectively. There was no significant difference in the amplitude of contractions, contraction cycle, motility index, and prox/distal ratio (97.15 vs 97.93%, P = 0.0745; 19.42 vs 19.5 s, P = 0.8590; and 887.58 vs 889.22, P = 0.5751; 9.75 vs 8.41, P = 0.8785; respectively). Conclusions & Inferences Oral sumatriptan administration enhanced gastric accommodation after the ingestion of liquid nutrients, but had no significant effect on antral contractions or intragastric distribution in healthy subjects.     

Secretin-induced gastric relaxation is mediated by vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and prostaglandin pathways

Abstract Secretin has been shown to delay gastric emptying and inhibit gastric motility. We have demonstrated that secretin acts on the afferent vagal pathway to induce gastric relaxation in the rat. However, the efferent pathway that mediates the action of secretin on gastric motility remains unknown. We recorded the response of intragastric pressure to graded doses of secretin administered intravenously to anaesthetized rats using a balloon attached to a catheter and placed in the body of the stomach. Secretin evoked a dose‐dependent decrease in intragastric pressure. The threshold dose of secretin was 1.4 pmol kg^?1 h^?1 and the effective dose, 50% was 5.6 pmol kg^?1 h^?1. Pretreatment with hexamethonium markedly reduced gastric relaxation induced by secretin (5.6 pmol kg^?1 h^?1). Bilateral vagotomy also significantly reduced gastric motor responses to secretin. Administration of N^G‐nitro‐l ‐arginine methyl ester (10 mg kg^?1) did not affect gastric relaxation induced by secretin. In contrast, intravenous administration of a vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) antagonist (30 nmol kg^?1) reduced the gastric relaxation response to secretin (5.6 pmol kg^?1 h^?1) by 89 ± 5%. Indomethacin (2 mg kg^?1) reduced gastric relaxation induced by secretin (5.6 pmol kg^?1 h^?1) by 87 ± 5%. Administration of prostaglandin (48 mg kg^?1 h^?1) prevented this inhibitory effect. Indomethacin also reduced gastric relaxation induced by VIP (300 pmol kg^?1) by 90 ± 7%. These observations indicate that secretin acts through stimulation of presynaptic cholinergic neurons in a vagally mediated pathway. Through nicotinic synapses, secretin stimulates VIP release from postganglionic neurons in the gastric myenteric plexus, which in turn induces gastric relaxation through a prostaglandin‐dependent pathway.     

Duodenal ulcer disease,gastroduodenal motor function and reflux esophagitis – a cross‐sectional survey in a subset of Taiwanese patients

Background To investigate the association between the gastric emptying rate and the presence of erosive esophagitis in duodenal ulcer (DU) patients among a population with high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection. Methods Cross‐sectional survey was performed in a cohort of 60 male patients with either active or healed DU, with or without the presence of erosive esophagitis. Clinical and social‐demographic data, blood level of fasting gastrin, pepsinogen I & I/II ratio, and scintigraphic measurement of half emptying time (t_1/2) of the solid phase gastric emptying were evaluated. Key Results Patients with active DU and erosive esophagitis tended to have higher plasma level of fasting gastrin than those without erosive esophagitis (75.11 ± 13.74 vs 45.81 ± 5.06 pg mL^?1, P = 0.059). In the absence of H. pylori infection, patients with healed DU and erosive esophagitis had a trend to have longer half‐emptying time (t_1/2: 96.5 ± 6.4 vs 69.1 ± 11.3 min, P = 0.0572) than those without erosive esophagitis, and statistically significant longer after excluding those diagnosed with hiatal hernia (t_1/2: 100.8 ± 7.9 min vs 69.1 ± 11.3 min, P < 0.05) from the former group. Among the healed DU patients, those with negative H. pylori infection, hiatal hernia and overweight (body mass index ≥24) had significantly increased risk of severe esophagitis. Conclusions & Inferences Presence of erosive esophagitis in a subset of Taiwanese patients with healed DU and negative H. pylori status was associated with slower solid phase gastric emptying.     

Increased rectal wall stiffness after prostate radiotherapy: relation with fecal urgency

Background Late anorectal toxicity is a frequent adverse event of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer. The pathophysiology of anorectal toxicity remains unknown, but we speculate that rectal distensibility is impaired due to fibrosis. Our goal was to determine whether EBRT induces changes of rectal distensibility as measured by an electronic barostat and to explore whether anorectal complaints are related to specific changes of anorectal function. Methods Thirty‐two men, irradiated for localized prostate carcinoma, underwent barostat measurements, anorectal manometry, and completed a questionnaire prior to and 1 year after radiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was rectal distensibility in response to stepwise isobaric distensions. In addition, we assessed sensory thresholds, anal pressures, and anorectal complaints. Key Results External beam radiotherapy reduced maximal rectal capacity (227 ± 14 mL vs 277 ± 15 mL; P < 0.001), area under the pressure‐volume curve (3212 ± 352 mL mmHg vs 3969 ± 413 mL mmHg; P < 0.005), and rectal compliance (15.7 ± 1.2 mL mmHg^?1vs 17.6 ± 0.9 mL mmHg^?1; P = 0.12). Sensory pressure thresholds did not significantly change. Sixteen of the 32 patients (50%) had one or more anorectal complaints. Patients with urgency (n = 10) had a more reduced anal squeeze and maximum pressure (decrease 29 ± 11 mmHg vs 1 ± 7 mmHg; P < 0.05 and 31 ± 12 mmHg vs 2 ± 8 mmHg; P < 0.05 respectively) compared with patients without complaints, indicating a deteriorated external anal sphincter function. Conclusions & Inferences Irradiation for prostate cancer leads to reduced rectal distensibility. In patients with urgency symptoms, anal sphincter function was also impaired.     

Assessment of gastric motor function in childhood functional dyspepsia and obesity

Background The aim was to compare gastric emptying rate and nutrient tolerance during a satiety drinking test in children with functional dyspepsia (FD) and obesity and to study the relationship between daily caloric intake and the satiety drinking test. Methods A total of 28 dyspeptic children (22 girls, mean age 12.5 ± 3.1 years) and 15 obese children (five girls, 13.3 ± 1.8 years) were studied. The patients underwent an octanoic acid gastric emptying breath test and a satiety drinking test. Prior to both tests, a dyspepsia questionnaire was filled out to calculate the mean calorie intake. Key Results The most prevalent dyspeptic symptoms were early satiety (96.4%), postprandial fullness (89.2%), and epigastric pain (78.6%), followed by nausea (50%). All dyspeptic and obese children (n = 43) started the satiety drinking test and 41 children completed the test until a score of 5 was reached. The maximum ingested volume in FD was significantly lower than in obesity or in age‐matched healthy controls (252 ± 85 vs 479 ± 199 and 359 ± 29 mL respectively, both P < 0.05). As a group, dyspeptic children had significantly slower gastric emptying than obese children (89.7 ± 54.8 min vs 72.5 ± 26.0 min, P = 0.05). Daily calorie intake was significantly higher in obese children than that in dyspeptic children (2325 ± 469 vs 1503 ± 272 cal, P < 0.0001). The endpoint of the satiety drinking test was significantly correlated with body weight or BMI (both R = 0.41, P = 0.04), but not with daily calorie intake, gastric emptying rate or age. Conclusions & Inferences The satiety drinking test is a potentially useful non‐invasive tool in the investigation of children with FD and obesity.     

Actions of prolonged ghrelin infusion on gastrointestinal transit and glucose homeostasis in humans

Background Ghrelin is produced by enteroendocrine cells in the gastric mucosa and stimulates gastric emptying in healthy volunteers and patients with gastroparesis in short‐term studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate effects of intravenous ghrelin on gastrointestinal motility and glucose homeostasis during a 6‐h infusion in humans. Methods Ghrelin (15 pmol kg^?1 min^?1) or saline was infused intravenously for 360 min after intake of radio‐opaque markers, acetaminophen, and lactulose after a standardized breakfast in 12 male volunteers. Gastric emptying, orocecal transit, colonic transit, postprandial plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1), and peptide YY were assessed. In vitro studies of gastrointestinal muscle contractility were performed. Key Results The gastric emptying rate was faster for ghrelin compared to saline (P = 0.002) with a shorter half‐emptying time (50.3 ± 3.9 vs 59.9 ± 4.4 min, P = 0.004). There was no effect of ghrelin on orocecal or colonic transit. Postprandial elevations of plasma glucose, insulin, and GLP‐1 occurred 15 min earlier and were higher with ghrelin. The insulinogenic index did not change during ghrelin infusion. Basal in vitro contractility was unaffected by ghrelin. Conclusions & Inferences The effect of a 6‐h ghrelin infusion on gastrointestinal motility is limited to the stomach without affecting orocecal or colonic transit. Plasma glucose, insulin, and GLP‐1 are elevated postprandially, probably as a result of the hastened gastric emptying. Changes in glucose homeostasis as a consequence of stimulated gastric emptying and hormone release, need to be taken into account in the use of pharmacological stimulants for the treatment of motility disorders.     

Magnetic resonance imaging as a non-invasive tool to assess gastric emptying in mice

Background

Methods to study gastric emptying in rodents are time consuming or terminal, preventing repetitive assessment in the same animal. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive technique increasingly used to investigate gastrointestinal function devoid of these shortcomings. Here, we evaluated MRI to measure gastric emptying in control animals and in two different models of gastroparesis.

Methods

Mice were scanned using a 9.4 Tesla MR scanner. Gastric volume was measured by delineating the stomach lumen area. Control mice were scanned every 30 min after ingestion of a 0.2 g meal and stomach volume was quantified. The ability of MRI to detect delayed gastric emptying was evaluated in models of morphine-induced gastroparesis and streptozotocin-induced diabetes.

Key Results

Magnetic resonance imaging reproducibly detected increased gastric volume following ingestion of a standard meal and progressively decreased with a half emptying time of 59 ± 5 min. Morphine significantly increased gastric volume measured at t = 120 min (saline: 20 ± 2 vs morphine: 34 ± 5 mm³; n = 8–10; p < 0.001) and increased half emptying time using the breath test (saline: 85 ± 22 vs morphine: 161 ± 46 min; n = 10; p < 0.001). In diabetic mice, gastric volume assessed by MRI at t = 60 min (control: 23 ± 2 mm³; n = 14 vs diabetic: 26 ± 5 mm³; n = 18; p = 0.014) but not at t = 120 min (control: 21 ± 3 mm³; n = 13 vs diabetic: 18 ± 5 mm³; n = 18; p = 0.115) was significantly increased compared to nondiabetic mice.

Conclusions and Inferences

Our data indicate that MRI is a reliable and reproducible tool to assess gastric emptying in mice and represents a useful technique to study gastroparesis in disease models or for evaluation of pharmacological compounds.     

Increased severity of dyspeptic symptoms related to mental stress is associated with sympathetic hyperactivity and enhanced endocrine response in patients with postprandial distress syndrome

Background Mental stress (MS) may alter gastric sensory‐motor function. The aim of the study was to assess postprandial autonomic nervous system activity and stress hormones in response to acute mental stress in dyspeptic patients. Methods A total of 25 patients with postprandial distress syndrome (PDS; 11 mol L^?1, age 35.9 ± 9.3 years) and 12 healthy controls (5 mol L^?1, age 25.8 ± 4.6 years) underwent electrogastrography and ¹³C‐octanoate gastric emptying study using a 480 kcal solid meal. Heart rate variability (LF/HF ratio) and corticotrophin‐releasing factor, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), and cortisol serum levels were also evaluated. Dyspeptic symptoms were scored by analogue visual scale and expressed as symptoms total score (TS). The protocol was repeated twice in each subject, with and without a mental stress test before the meal. Key Results Mental stress significantly increased postprandial symptoms severity in patients (TS: stress 111 ± 18 vs basal 50 ± 10; P < 0.05). Low‐/high‐frequency component ratio was significantly higher in patients after MS at 120 min (stress 5.46 ± 0.41 vs basal 3.41 ± 0.64; P < 0.01) and 180 min (stress 5.29 ± 0.2 vs basal 3.58 ± 0.19; P < 0.05). During stress session, in patients we found a significantly higher ACTH level than baseline at 30, 60, 90, 150, 210, 240, and 270 min and a significantly higher cortisol level at 30, 60, 90, 120, 210, and 270 min. Gastric emptying rate and electrical activity were not influenced by MS. Conclusions & Inferences In PDS patients, administration of MS before meal increases symptoms severity by inducing sympathetic hyperactivity and increased stress hormones levels. As the gastric emptying looks not altered, we conclude that these neurohormonal responses mainly affect sensitive function.     

Ameliorating effects of mirtazapine on visceral hypersensitivity in rats with neonatal colon sensitivity

Background The aim was to investigate the effects of mirtazapine on visceral hypersensitivity and gastric emptying in an established rodent model of colonic sensitization. Methods Twenty colonic sensitized rats and 20 matched controls were used. Visceral sensitivity during colorectal distension (CRD) was assessed by the measurement of abdominal electromyogram (EMG) with the pressures of 20, 40, and 60 mmHg. Mirtazapine with doses of 1, 5, and 10 mg kg⁻¹ were administered orally. Gastric emptying and small intestinal transit were performed in a separated experiment after gavage of 1.5 mL of phenol red solution. Key Results (i) Visceral hypersensitivity after neonatal colonic sensitization was confirmed. (ii) Mirtazapine dose‐dependently reduced visceral hypersensitivity in the colonic sensitized rats. The increases in EMG during CRD at 40, 60 mmHg were, 17.59 ± 6.49 and 26.04 ± 8.30, respectively, with saline session, and substantially reduced to 10.0 ± 5.95 (P = 0.02 vs corresponding saline) and 12.58 ± 7.43 (P < 0.001 vs saline) with mirtazapine at 10 mg kg⁻¹. Similar findings were noted at doses of 5 and 1 mg kg⁻¹ at a lesser degree. In the control rats, mirtazapine‐reduced visceral sensitivity only during CRD at 60 mmHg. (iii) Mirtazapine 10 mg kg⁻¹ significantly accelerated gastric emptying (P = 0.045) but slightly and marginally delayed intestinal transit (P = 0.058) the colonic sensitized rats. Conclusions & Inferences Mirtazapine dose‐dependently ameliorates visceral hypersensitivity in colonic sensitized rats. Mirtazapine at a high dose improves delayed gastric emptying in colonic sensitized rats but slightly and marginally delays small intestinal transit. Its roles in altering gastrointestinal motility need further investigation.