DOUBLE BALLOON ENDOSCOPE FACILITATES ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY IN ROUX‐EN‐Y ANASTOMOSIS PATIENTS

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the gold standard for the treatment of patients with pancreaticobiliary disorders, but endoscopic therapy is very difficult to carry out in patients with a Roux‐en‐Y anastomosis. We herein present the results of ERCP for patients with a Roux‐en‐Y anastomosis using a double‐balloon endoscope. Six patients (six men with a mean age of 69 years) who had undergone prior gastric resection with Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction were enrolled in the present study and underwent ERCP and associated procedures. ERCP was carried out with a double balloon endoscope, which has one balloon attached to the tip of the endoscope and another attached to the distal end of the soft overtube. In all patients, entering the Y loop was successfully accomplished, and the papilla of Vater was also reached in all cases (100%). Cannulation was successful in four patients (66.7%). The final diagnosis was choledocholithiasis in two patients, biliary fistula in one patient and pancreatic cancer in one patient. A needle‐knife precut papillotomy was carried out after placement of a bile duct stent in two patients, and injection of N‐butyl‐2‐cyanoacrylate into a biliary fistula was carried out in one patient. None of the patients suffered from any complications. A double balloon endoscope is therefore considered to be useful for carrying out ERCP and associated procedures in patients with a Roux‐en‐Y anastomosis.     

ERCP AFTER ROUX‐EN‐Y RECONSTRUCTION CAN BE CARRIED OUT USING AN OBLIQUE‐VIEWING ENDOSCOPE WITH AN OVERTUBE

Background: We report that an oblique‐viewing endoscope facilitates endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in Billroth II reconstruction. With this endoscope, we carried out ERCP in Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction. Methods: Fifteen patients with Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction were enrolled. Eleven of these patients had undergone gastrectomy, while Whipple's operation or choledochectomy had each been carried out in two patients. Among the 11 post‐gastrectomy patients, eight had bile duct stones, and there was one case each of pancreatic abscess with chronic pancreatitis, bile duct obstruction due to gallbladder, or pancreatic cancer. The remaining four patients suffered from stenotic anastomosis of choledochojejunostomy. All procedures were carried out with an oblique‐viewing endoscope. Results: The papilla of Vater or anastomosis was reached in 10 patients. In these 10 patients, all planned procedures were completed. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (EPBD) was carried out in three patients with bile duct stones. The remaining three patients with bile duct stones underwent sphincterotomy with tube stent placement, EPBD after sphincterotomy with biliary tube stent placement, and biliary tube stent placement, respectively. Pancreatic stent placement via the minor papilla was carried out in one patient with pancreatic abscess, and a biliary tube stent was introduced in the patient with gallbladder cancer. Two patients underwent cutting of a stenotic anastomosis with a needle knife, followed by balloon dilatation. None of the patients experienced any complications. Conclusion: The results appear to support the feasibility of using an oblique‐viewing endoscope for ERCP in Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction. Further studies including a large population of patients should be planned to confirm these results.     

PANCREATIC PSEUDOCYSTS IN POST‐GASTRECTOMY PATIENTS TREATED VIA THE DUODENAL MINOR PAPILLA WITH AN OBLIQUE‐VIEWING ENDOSCOPE

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients after Billroth II or Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction is challenging because of difficulties in insertion of the endoscope into the afferent loop, which is a great distance away from the papilla of Vater, and cannulation into the desired duct from a reverse position. To facilitate ERCP, various endoscopes have been selected according to operator preference. Previously, we reported that an oblique‐viewing endoscope (XK‐200; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) can contribute to successful performance of ERCP and associated procedures in Billroth II gastrectomy patients. We report here our experience with two post‐gastrectomy patients with chronic pancreatitis who were treated with an oblique‐viewing endoscope from the minor papilla.     

OBLIQUE‐VIEWING ENDOSCOPE FACILITATES ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY AND ASSOCIATED PROCEDURES IN POST‐BILLROTH II GASTRECTOMY PATIENTS

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and associated procedures have been reported to be difficult to perform in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy. We evaluated the feasibility of using an oblique‐viewing endoscope equipped with a cannula deflector for these procedures in such patients. Patients and Methods: Twenty‐four patients with Billroth II gastrectomy were enrolled in the present study and underwent ERCP, endoscopic sphincterotomy, endoscopic nasobiliary drainage, expandable metal stent placement or tube stent placement. All procedures were performed with an oblique‐viewing endoscope equipped with a cannula deflector. Results: In all patients, afferent loops were entered. Reaching the papilla of Vater was achieved in 22 (91.7%) patients, in whom all planned procedures were accomplished. One patient experienced acute pancreatitis, hemorrhage from the papilla of Vater after sphincterotomy, and intestinal perforation. Conclusions: We believe an oblique‐viewing endoscope equipped with a cannula deflector to be useful in performing ERCP and associated procedures in many patients with Billroth II gastrectomy. However, one should be aware of major complications, such as perforation, that may occur.     

ENDOSCOPIC PANCREATIC SPHINCTEROTOMY PLUS LARGE‐BALLOON DILATION FOR REMOVAL OF A LARGE IMPACTED PANCREATIC DUCT STONE (WITH VIDEO)

Pancreatic duct stones are a common complication of chronic pancreatitis. We describe successful endoscopic removal of a large pancreatic duct stone using large‐balloon dilation in combination with pancreatic sphincterotomy. A 63‐year‐old woman was admitted for endoscopic treatment of acute on chronic pancreatitis with diabetes and epigastric pain with liver dysfunction due to a large impacted stone within the distal main pancreatic duct. Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy was carried out using a wire‐guided pull‐type sphincterotome. Although we could carry out a relatively large incision, the stone could not be extracted. We therefore carried out papillary dilation using a large balloon (diameter 12 to 15 mm) to make room alongside the stone. A 10 × 20‐mm white pancreatic duct stone was extracted during the process of pulling a dilating balloon into the working channel of the endoscope. Eventually, the second stone was removed without any procedure‐related complication.     

PERCUTANEOUS PANCREATIC‐DUCT PUNCTURE WITH RENDEZVOUS TECHNIQUE CAN TREAT STENOTIC PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY

Stenotic pancreatico‐enteric anastomosis is one of the serious late complications after a pancreaticoduodenectomy. We report a case of stenotic pancreaticojejunostomy with a pancreatic juice fistula drained externally, which was treated using percutaneous procedures combined with a rendezvous method. A 77‐year‐old woman was referred to our hospital for an endoscopic treatment to remove a percutaneous drainage tube from a fluid collection due to pancreatic juice fistula. She had undergone pylorus‐preserving pancreatoduodenectomy with Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction due to duodenal carcinoma of Vater's papilla 1 year before the referral to our hospital. Soon after the operation, she had developed a fluid collection adjacent to the anastomosis due to pancreatic juice fistulas and subsequently had undergone its percutaneous drainage. After admission, we tried to dilate the stenotic anastomosis with an endoscopic procedure from the anastomosed jejunal lumen, using an oblique‐viewing endoscope. The endoscope reached a portion of the anastomosis, but did not allow us to visualize the entire anastomosis. We punctured the main pancreatic duct under ultrasonography and fluoroscopy, and advanced the needle into the anastomosed jejunum through the stenotic anastomosis. After putting a guidewire into the anastomosed jejunum through the needle, we introduced an oblique‐viewing endoscope into the anastomosed jejunum and caught hold of the guidewire using grasping forceps. Maintaining tension on the guidewire with a slight pulling force, with some effort we were able to place a 5‐Fr drainage catheter into the jejunum percutaneously and through the anastomosis via the main pancreatic duct. Three weeks after these procedures, we performed balloon dilation of the anastomosis. One week after balloon dilation, removed the percutaneous catheter.     

USEFULNESS OF ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT FOR DUODENAL ADENOMA

In recent years, due to the increasing prevalence of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, there have been an increasing number of reports on duodenal adenoma and early stage cancer. However, endoscopic techniques for the resection of duodenal adenomas are difficult, due to the anatomical features of the duodenum, and the long distance to the lesion. There have only been a few reports on the use of endoscopic techniques for duodenal adenomas compared to those focused on the stomach and large intestine. For duodenal adenomas, we used a conventional endoscope for lesions proximal to the major duodenal papilla, and a short‐type double balloon endoscope for lesions distal to the papilla. The en‐bloc resection rate was 93.8%. There was only one case of microperforation. Endoscopic manipulation is considered difficult in the deep areas of the duodenum, but double balloon endoscopy enabled stable manipulation and successful resection of the tumor in the majority of cases.     

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy using balloon-assisted enteroscope

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with surgically altered anatomy involves challenging procedures for ERCP endoscopists. In these patients, the anatomical structure of the intestine is substantially altered, and an endoscope needs to be inserted into the long afferent limb. Moreover, the papilla is observed in the opposite view from the normal anatomy. Recently, a balloon-assisted enteroscope (BAE) has been developed and made available for use in daily practice. The two types of BAE are single-balloon enteroscope (SBE), which is inserted with one balloon attached to the overtube using a balloon-assisted method, and double-balloon enteroscope (DBE), which is inserted with two balloons, one attached to the overtube and the other attached to the tip of the enteroscope. In addition, short-type DBE (short-DBE) and short-type SBE (short-SBE) with a working length of approximately 150 cm, which could be used with various ERCP accessories, are commercially available or under development. Notably, the success rate of ERCP through coordinated manipulation with a balloon was remarkably improved with the use of BAE, even in patients with surgically altered anatomy. Here, we report the current status and procedures of ERCP in patients with surgically altered anatomy.     

SMALL SPHINCTEROTOMY COMBINED WITH ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLARY LARGE BALLOON DILATION IN PATIENTS WITH BILLROTH II GASTRECTOMY

Background: The difficulty in orienting a duodenoscope or sphincterotome in Billroth II gastrectomy patients with an afferent loop is well known to experienced biliary endoscopists. In patients who have large biliary stones, stone retrieval is technically difficult, particularly when a mechanical lithotriptor is required. To address this issue a new technique was developed to gain greater access to the common bile duct. Methods: This new technique, small endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (SES + EPLD), was carried out in eight cases with Billroth II reconstruction. First, endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) with a small incision was performed with a capped forward‐viewing endoscope. Then, endoscopic papillary dilation was performed with a large balloon to slowly match the size of the bile duct. Stones were then retrieved from the biliary duct with a balloon and a basket. Results: Stone retrieval was successful in all cases. Dilating the papillary orifice with a large balloon made it possible to remove large stones smoothly without crushing them. After dilation with the large balloon, there were some instances of oozing, but no perforations near the papilla. Conclusions: SES + EPLD was effective for the retrieval of large biliary stones without the use of mechanical lithotripsy for B‐II reconstruction cases. This new method, incorporating a slow dilation of the papilla up to a large diameter, could provide a larger opening than a large ES. This method of stone retrieval is easy to perform and may be able to play a role in the treatment of large and multiple bile duct stones with B‐II gastrectomy.     

Recent advances in endoscopic management of difficult bile duct stones

Endoscopic treatment is now recognized worldwide as the first‐line treatment for bile duct stones. Endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with basket and/or balloon catheter is generally carried out for stone extraction. However, some stones are refractory to treatment under certain circumstances, necessitating additional/other therapeutic modalities. Large bile duct stones are typically treated by mechanical lithotripsy. However, if this fails, laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) is carried out under the guidance of conventional mother‐baby cholangioscopy. More recently, direct cholangioscopy using an ultrathin gastroscope and the newly developed single‐use cholangioscope system – the SpyGlass direct visualization system – are also used. In addition, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has also been used for stone fragmentation. Such fragmentation techniques are effective in cases with impacted stones, including Mirizzi syndrome. Most recently, endoscopic papillary large balloon dilationhas been introduced as an easy and effective technique for treating large and multiple stones. In cases of altered anatomy, it is often difficult to reach the papilla; in such cases, a percutaneous transhepatic approach, such as EHL or laser lithotripsy under percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy, can be a treatment option. Moreover, enteroscopy has recently been used to reach the papilla. Furthermore, an endoscopic ultrasound‐guided procedure has been attempted most recently. In elderly patients and those with very poor general condition, biliary stenting only is sometimes carried out with or without giving subsequent dissolution agents.     

EXPERIENCES OF BILIARY INTERVENTIONS USING SHORT DOUBLE‐BALLOON ENTEROSCOPY IN PATIENTS WITH ROUX‐EN‐Y ANASTOMOSIS OR HEPATICOJEJUNOSTOMY

Background: The efficacy of double‐balloon enteroscopy (DBE) for biliary interventions has been shown in patients with surgical anatomy. However, the use of available endoscopic retrograde cholangiography accessories during this procedure is limited because of the length of the conventional instrument (200 cm). The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of short DBE for managing biliary disorders in patients with a Roux‐en‐Y gastrectomy or hepaticojejunostomy (HJ). Patients and Methods: Using a short enteroscope (152 cm) and commercially available endoscopic retrograde cholangiography accessories, biliary interventions were performed in six patients with Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction or HJ anastomosis. Results: A total of 12 biliary interventions were performed; balloon dilations of the HJ anastomosis or intrahepatic ducts (four patients), nasobiliary drainages (three patients), bile duct stone removal after endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with or without small sphincterotomy (two patients), and a biliary stent placement (one patient). One patient showed retroperitoneal air following endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation, but recovered conservatively. Conclusions: Biliary interventions via DBE using a short enteroscope are feasible in patients with surgical anatomy.     

Clinical results of observation of the upper gastrointestinal tract by transgastrostomic endoscopy using an ultrathin endoscope

Background and Aim: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy through the oral cavity of patients who have undergone percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) causes some distress and puts these patients at risk of aspiration pneumonia. The aim of this study was to evaluate results for the upper gastrointestinal tract by transgastrostomic endoscopy using an ultrathin endoscope. Methods: The study subjects were 43 patients, who underwent exchange of a PEG button or tube, 20‐French or more in diameter. After PEG buttons or tubes were extracted from the gastrostomy tract, an ultrathin endoscope was inserted through the gastrostomy tract. The stomach and the duodenal bulb were observed and the esophagus was observed in retrograde passage. A new PEG button or tube was then inserted. The rate of successful insertion into the esophagus and duodenal bulb, the observation of the gastrostomy site in retroversion in the stomach, and the endoscopic findings were analyzed. Results: Ninety‐nine examinations were carried out. The esophagus could be observed in 95 (96.0%), the duodenum in 92 (92.9%) and the gastrostomy site in the stomach in all. Gastric polyps were detected in four patients, gastric erosions in two, reflux esophagitis in two, polypoid lesion at the gastrostomy tract in two, gastric ulcer scar in one, duodenal ulcer scar in one, early gastric cancer in one and recurrent esophageal cancer in one. Neither discomfort nor complications occurred during transgastrostomic endoscopy. Conclusions: Observation of the upper gastrointestinal tract by transgastrostomic endoscopy using an ultrathin endoscope during a gastrostomy button or tube replacement may be useful and safe.     

Novel stenting method for malignant right colonic stenosis using ultra‐thin endoscopy: Report of four cases

Placement of a self‐expandable metallic stent (SEMS) is recognized as a safe and effective procedure for patients with malignant severe colonic stenosis. However, reports of this stent for right‐sided colonic stenosis are limited, possibly as a result of technical difficulties. We report a new method for delivering SEMS to the site of right‐sided colonic stenosis in four patients with malignant right‐sided colonic stenosis. Technical success was obtained with sequential use of a double‐balloon endoscope and ultrathin endoscope, while we also injected non‐ionic contrast agent into the submucosal layer as a marker for stenting under fluoroscopy. There were no adverse events noted during the procedure and clinical improvement was seen in all four cases. In conclusion, SEMS placement for right‐sided malignant colonic stenosis with our newly developed method appears to be safe and effective, and can be used for decompression of the right colon.     

Large dilating balloon to allow endoscope insertion for successful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy (with video)

Background and purpose

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with surgically altered anatomy can be present unique challenges. One of the major obstacles preventing successful ERCP is acute angulation and long afferent loops in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Here, we described a novel technique for successful endoscope insertion using a large dilating balloon.

Methods

The large dilating balloon (maximum diameter 20 mm) is used as an anchor for endoscope insertion (hooking method) in patients with Billroth II gastrectomy in whom no other endoscopes could be advanced into the end of the duodenum or the Roux-en-Y anastomosis.

Results

The hooking method allows the endoscope to be advanced into the proximal afferent loop, even in patients with sharp angulation of the Y limb.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the use of a large dilating balloon for endoscope insertion in patients with surgically altered anatomy, in particular Roux-en-Y anastomosis. We believe this technique may be effective for difficult cases like the present case.     

DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF SMALL BOWEL DISEASES WITH A NEWLY DEVELOPED SINGLE BALLOON ENDOSCOPE

Background: Recent advances in capsule endoscopy (CE) and double balloon endoscopy (DBE) have enabled an endoscopic approach to small bowel diseases. However, CE is simply a diagnostic tool and DBE is fairly complicated to handle. Methods: We developed a single balloon endoscopy (SBE) in cooperation with Olympus Medical Systems. The single balloon enteroscope consists of an endoscope and a splinting tube. In this system, a balloon is attached to the splinting tube, but not to the scope itself. The single‐person insertion method was effective for SBE cases, but two persons were needed for DBE. The patients we examined had undergone upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and were suspected of having small intestinal diseases. We examined a total of 30 cases (nine women, 21 men; range 19–78 years), and carried out a total of 48 examinations. Results: In fifteen cases, the cause of bleeding was diagnosed as either ulcer, angiodysplasia, Crohn's disease, inflammatory polyp, or metastatic cancer, but in eight cases, the cause was not identified. Four obstruction cases comprised ulcers, adhesion, and jejunal volvulus. For treatment, clippings were performed for bleeding in three patients, polypectomy for two, reversal of volvulus for one, and balloon dilation for ilial stenosis in one. The entire small intestine was observed in 71% of patients when the intention was to examine the whole bowel. No complications were encountered. Conclusions: The newly developed SBE is useful for diagnosis and treatment of small bowel diseases.     

TEACHING DEEP CANNULATION OF THE BILE DUCT DURING ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY

When performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), the smooth introduction of the duodenoscope into the papilla of Vater, an appropriate view of the papilla of Vater, and deep cannulation of the bile duct are essential. The operator must know the difference between the side‐viewing endoscope and the forward‐viewing endoscope. The rotation of the body and the left arm of the operator, switching with the left wrist, and dialing of the endoscope are essential for appropriately viewing the papilla of Vater. When training operators to do ERCP, a model is useful for helping them understand basic handling. The approach to deep cannulation of the bile duct should be selected based on the type of papilla (slit type, onion type, tongue protrusion type, flat type, and tumor type). Cannulation is more difficult in patients with the tongue protrusion‐type of papilla than with a slit type, onion type, or tumor type. According to previous reports, therapeutic ERCP requires the ability to cannulate the common bile duct deeply 80% of the time; 180 to 200 supervised ERCP are necessary to achieve this success rate.     

COMPARISON OF THE DIAGNOSTIC UTILITY OF THE ULTRATHIN ENDOSCOPE AND THE CONVENTIONAL ENDOSCOPE IN EARLY GASTRIC CANCER SCREENING

Currently, transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy using an ultrathin endoscope is being widely carried out as a screening test for early gastric cancer. We compared the diagnostic utility of ultrathin esophagogastroduodenoscopy with that of conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy in detecting 42 lesions of early gastric cancer that had a diameter of ≤20 mm. Only 27 lesions (64%) could be accurately diagnosed using ultrathin esophagogastroduodenoscopy. In nine lesions (22%), we failed to discern whether they were malignant. Six lesions (14%) could not even be detected. We found that the diagnostic utility of ultrathin esophagogastroduodenoscopy was inadequate, especially in the case of lesions that were located in the upper third region of the stomach and variegated lesions. In conclusion, the diagnostic utility of ultrathin esophagogastroduodenoscopy might be lower than that of conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy in terms of screening for early gastric cancer. The disadvantages of ultrathin esophagogastroduodenoscopy should be taken carefully into consideration while examining lesions.     

Direct insertion of an ultra‐slim upper endoscope for cholangioscopy in patients undergoing choledochoduodenostomy

Direct peroral cholangioscopy (POC) using an ultra‐slim upper endoscope is one modality of POC for intraductal endoscopic evaluation and treatment of the bile duct. Choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) is one modality of biliary bypass surgery that provides a new route to the bile duct. We carried out direct POC using an ultra‐slim upper endoscope without the use of accessories in 10 patients (four sump syndromes, three bile duct strictures and three intrahepatic duct stones) previously undergoing surgical CDS. Direct POC was successful in all patients. The use of an intraductal balloon catheter was required in one patient for advancement of the endoscope into the bile duct. Distal bile ducts with sump syndromes were cleared using baskets and water irrigation under direct POC. Cholangiocarcinoma was diagnosed in one patient with hilar bile duct stricture after cholangioscopic evaluation and a targeting forceps biopsy under direct POC. Intrahepatic duct stones were successfully extracted after intraductal fragmentation under direct POC. Oozing bleeding occurred during intraductal lithotripsy but stopped spontaneously. Direct POC using an ultra‐slim upper endoscope without the assistance of accessories can easily be carried out in patients undergoing CDS.     

ENDOSCOPIC NECROSECTOMY UNDER DIRECT VISION AFTER ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND‐GUIDED CYSTGASTROSTOMY FOR ORGANIZED PANCREATIC NECROSIS

A 56‐year‐old man was referred for an enlarging pancreatic pseudocyst that developed after severe acute pancreatitis with gallstones. Abdominal ultrasound showed a huge cystic lesion with a large amount of solid high echoic components. Arterial phase contrast‐enhanced computed tomography scan revealed arteries across the cystic cavity. Stents were placed after endoscopic ultrasound‐guided cystgastrostomy; however, the stents were obstructed by necrotic debris, and secondary infection of the pseudocyst occurred. Therefore, the cystgastrostomy was dilated by a dilation balloon, and a forward‐viewing endoscope was inserted into the cystic cavity. Many vessels and a large amount of necrotic debris existed in the cavity. Under direct vision, all necrotic debris was safely removed using a retrieval net and forceps. One year after this procedure, there was no recurrence. Our case indicates that peripancreatic fat necrosis can cause exposure of vessels across/along the cystic cavity, and blind necrosectomy should be avoided.     

Successful biliary drainage using a metal stent through the gastric stoma

We report a case of biliary drainage for malignant stricture using a metal stent with an ultrathin endoscope through the gastric stoma. A 78-year-old female was referred to our hospital for jaundice and fever. She had undergone percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) for esophageal obstruction after radiation therapy for cancer of the pharynx. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a 3-cm enhanced mass in the middle bile duct and dilatation of the intra-hepatic bile duct. We initially performed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with a trans-oral approach. However, neither the side-viewing endoscope nor the ultrathin endoscope passed through the esophageal orifice. Thus, we eventually performed ERCP via the PEG stoma using an ultrathin endoscope. We performed biliary drainage with a 6F introducer self-expanding metal stent. The cytology findings obtained by brush cytology showed malignancy. Her laboratory results were restored to normal levels after drainage and no complication occurred.