血清PSA密度变化对前列腺癌高危人群的诊断价值

目的:探讨前列腺特异抗原(PSA)、前列腺特异抗原密度(PSAD)变化对前列腺癌高危人群的诊断价值。方法:对初次活检阴性的432例患者进行随访,其中79例重复穿刺活检,确诊前列腺癌27例(34.2%),消化道来源肿瘤1例,BPH25例,前列腺上皮内肿瘤(PIN)13例,慢性前列腺炎13例。对重复活检患者的PSA、PSAD等临床资料进行统计分析。结果:配对t检验显示,良性病变首末次穿刺前PSA、PSAD差异均无统计学意义,而前列腺癌末次穿刺前PSA、PSAD较首次穿刺前升高,差异有统计学意义。以PSA>4ng/ml筛选前列腺癌,其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值分别为92.5%、17.6%、37.6%,PSA末-PSA首>0筛选前列腺癌的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值分别为85.2%、41.2%、40.4%;而以PSAD末-PSAD首>0筛选前列腺癌的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值分别为81.5%、54.9%、48.9%。结论:在前列腺癌高危人群中应该重复穿刺,以减少漏诊;以PSAD动态升高来指导穿刺,可以明显提高阳性率。     

Predictors of prostate cancer on repeat transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the outcome of repeated transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic prostate biopsy in Japanese men whose clinical findings were suspected of prostate cancer after previous negative biopsies. METHODS: Between January 1993 and March 2002, 1045 patients underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Among them, 104 patients underwent repeat biopsy due to indications of persistent elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) or TRUS, increased PSA velocity, and/or previous suspicious biopsy findings. Several clinicopathological factors were evaluated for their ability to predict the detection of prostate cancer on repeat biopsy. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was detected in 22 of 104 patients (21.2%) who underwent repeat biopsies. PSA concentration and PSA density at both the initial and repeat biopsies, and PSA velocity in men with positive repeat biopsy were significantly greater than those in men with negative repeat biopsy. The incidence of abnormal findings in DRE and TRUS at initial biopsy in men with positive repeat biopsy was also significantly higher than that in men with negative repeat biopsy. However, neither the presence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia nor number of biopsy cores at initial biopsy had a significant association with the results of the repeat biopsy. Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that PSA and PSA density at both the initial and repeat biopsies, PSA velocity, and DRE and TRUS findings at initial biopsy were independent predictors of malignant disease on repeat biopsy. CONCLUSION: Despite an initial negative biopsy, repeat TRUS-guided biopsy should be carried out to exclude prostate cancer in cases of suspicious clinical findings, such as elevated PSA or PSA-related parameters, or abnormal findings of DRE or TRUS.     

Examination for indication of systematic biopsy for diagnosis of prostate cancer]

BACKGROUND: Systematic biopsy has been commonly used for detection of prostate cancer. Nevertheless, as this examination occasionally gives patients severe complications it is necessary to give careful consideration for application of this examination. Thus, we analyzed retrospectively 145 cases who underwent transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) guided systematic biopsy to evaluate the application of systematic biopsy, correlating with the findings of digital rectal examination (DRE), prostate specific antigen (PSA), the findings of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and the results of biopsies. METHODS: Between May, 1995 and May, 1997, 143 patients who were suspected to have prostate cancer with either of PSA and DRE, and 2 patients who received visual laser ablation of prostate (VLAP), underwent TRUS guided systematic biopsy of prostate. We evaluated diagnostic efficacy of PSA, DRE, TRUS, prostate-volume-specific PSA, and PSA density (PSAD). RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (P.P.V.) are 78.4%, 62.8% and 53.5% for DRE, 100.0%, 4.4% and 41.8% for PSA, 88.2%, 60.0% and 52.9% for TRUS, 87.8%, 72.1% and 64.2% for prostate-volume-specific PSA, 100.0%, 30.6% and 45.4% for PSAD, respectively. Ten of 69 patients (14.5%) whose PSA levels were 4.0 to 10.0 ng/ml were diagnosed as cancer, and positive for both or either of DRE and TRUS. Twenty-seven who were negative for both of DRE and TRUS were not diagnosed as prostate cancer. Using the combination of prostate-volume-specific PSA, DRE and TRUS, we could eliminate 29 non-cancer men (21.5%) whose PSA level was greater than 4.0 ng/ml from systematic biopsy. CONCLUSION: On the diagnosis of prostate cancer, the combination of prostate-volume-specific PSA, DRE and TRUS is very useful to exclude unnecessary systematic biopsy, if an urologist could be used to and trained for DRE and TRUS.     

以前列腺特异抗原水平分组筛查与前列腺穿刺阳性率的关系

目的探讨不同血清前列腺特异抗原(PSA)水平前列腺癌检出情况以及直肠指诊(DRE)、经直肠超声检查(TRUS)、PSA密度(PSAD)等指标对筛查前列腺穿刺活检病例的意义。方法回顾性分析在1996年4月至2002年12月间行TRUS引导前列腺6点系统穿刺活检的634例患者的诊断资料,对各PSA组(≤4.0,4.1~,10.1~和>20.0μg/L组)中前列腺癌的检出率,以及PSA、DRE、TRUS、PSAD等对前列腺癌的预测作用进行t检验、χ2检验和多因素Logistic回归分析。结果PSA≤4.0,4.1~,10.1~和>20.0μg/L各组的前列腺癌检出率分别为11.6%(17/146),26.8%(38/142),39.8%(68/171)和68.6%(120/175)。PSA的敏感性最高(93.0%),特异性低(33.0%);DRE、TRUS等诊断效率较低。随血清PSA水平升高,前列腺癌检出率以及DRE、TRUS的阳性预测值逐渐升高;在PSA4.1~20.0μg/L者中,PSAD对前列腺癌有较大的预测价值(OR=687.09±646.96,P=0.000)。以PSAD≥0.13μg.L-1.cm-3为截点筛查前列腺穿刺病例,可在不明显降低敏感性的基础上,减少阴性穿刺。结论各PSA组国人与欧美等国前列腺癌检出率有较大差别;DRE、TRUS的筛查作用与血清PSA水平有关;按PSA水平分组筛查穿刺病例,可提高前列腺穿刺的阳性率。     

常规临床检查与PSA灰区患者前列腺癌检出率的关系

目的:探讨直肠指检(DRE)、影像学(TRUS、MRI)检查、血清游离与总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)比值(f/t)与PSA在4～10μg/L之间患者前列腺癌检出率的关系。方法:回顾性分析365例PSA处于灰区的患者进行DRE、TRUS、MRI检查、游离PSA测定,并对这些患者行经直肠B超引导下的前列腺穿刺活检。评估其临床资料与前列腺穿刺病理结果的关系。结果:在365例患者中,穿刺病理为前列腺癌的患者共有87例(23.84%)。DRE阳性的患者共有128例,穿刺阳性40例,阳性率为31.25%,TRUS检查的患者共有257例,其中有异常回声结节的69例患者中穿刺阳性26例,阳性率为37.68%,MRI检查的患者共有191例,其中有异常信号结节的107例患者中穿刺阳性59例,阳性率为55.14%。198例患者行fPSA与tPSA比值分析,其中前列腺癌患者的平均f/t PSA明显低于穿刺阴性患者。f/t PSA受试者曲线(ROC)下的面积(0.725)高于患者PSA ROC的面积(0.542)。结论:结合临床DRE、影像学资料及f/t PSA比值可以有效提高前列腺癌检出率,从而减少不必要的穿刺给患者带来的痛苦。     

Evaluation of Prostate Specific Antigen Density and Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Biopsies in 100 Consecutive Patients with a Negative Digital Rectal Examination and Intermediate Serum Prostate Specific Antigen Levels

Background : This study was undertaken to assess the importance of prostate biopsies in patients with a negative digital rectal examination (DRE) and elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and to investigate the role of PSA density (PSAD) and hypoechoic lesions on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in increasing the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer (PCa). Methods : One hundred patients with varied initial symptoms who had a negative DRE and a PSA level between 4 and 20ng/mL underwent TRUS-guided systematic and, if present, lesion-directed biopsies. Results : PCa was detected in 11 patients (11%). TRUS examinations revealed hypoechoic lesions in 31 patients. Lesion-directed biopsies revealed PCa in 1 3% (4/31) of patients with abnormal TRUS whereas, 7% (5/69) of patients with negative TRUS findings had PCa. Additional systematic biopsies detected PCa in 2 patients where lesion-directed biopsies were negative. None (0/19) of the lesions smaller than 0.2 ml on TRUS had PCa whereas, 33% (4/1 2) of patients with lesions greater than 0.2 ml had PCa. When the subgroup of patients with negative TRUS and PSA levels between 4 and 10ng/mL were considered, 25% (1/4) of cases with PCa would have been missed if 0.15 was used as the cut-off point for PSAD, however, this would save 61% (30/49) of unnecessary biopsies. The positive predictive value of PSA (cut-off level lOng/mL), PSAD (cut-off level 0.15), and hypoechoic lesions on TRUS were found to be 11.5%, 33%, and 13%, respectively. When hypoechoic lesions greater than 0.2 mL were taken as the positive finding, the positive predictive value and specificity rates of TRUS increased to 33% and 91 %, respectively, without any change in the sensitivity. Conclusions : In patients with a negative DRE and intermediate PSA levels, the application of PSAD would have saved 49% of study patients with BPH from a biopsy, but would have missed 27% of PCa cases. By ignoring lesions smaller than 0.2 mL on TRUS, a very high specificity of 91% was achieved with a sensitivity of 36%. Thus, further investigations aimed at defining a better mode of diagnosis of PCa are warranted.     

PSAD在PSA 4～10ng患者前列腺癌诊断中的价值

目的探讨前列腺特异性抗原密度（PSAD）在前列腺特异性抗原（PSA）值介于4～10ng之间患者前列腺腺癌诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析183例血清PSA值介于4～10ng之间疑似前列腺癌患者的临床资料,所有患者均经直肠B超测得前列腺体积后再行经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺术,通过接受者工作特征曲线分析法评价PSAD在预测诊断前列腺癌中的应用价值。结果 183例患者中36例经直肠超声下前列腺活检的患者被诊断为前列腺癌,占19.7%。良性前列腺增生组与前列腺癌患者之间,PSA（0.681 5）与PSAD（0.721 4）的曲线下方面积比较相似,而游离前列腺特异性抗原与总前列腺特异性抗原比值（f/tPSA）的曲线下面积只有0.318 2,相比PSA,PSAD值将是一个更好的预测前列腺癌的指标。结论 PSAD对于PSA值介于4～10ng/mL的中国患者是一项更好的预测前列腺癌的指标。     

建立预测中国人前列腺重复穿刺活检阳性的数学模型

目的:建立可以预测国人经直肠超声引导下重复穿刺活检阳性的数学模型。方法:170例在首次穿刺活检诊断为前列腺良性病变的患者行重复穿刺。记录并分析患者的年龄、前列腺体积、血清PSA、游离PSA(f-PSA)/总PSA(t-PSA)、PSA上升速度、PSA密度(PSAD)、直肠指检(DRE)、首次穿刺病理结果等相关因素。将变量通过逐步回归建立回归方程,在此基础上建立重复穿刺活检阳性的危险评分数学模型。该模型的预测价值通过受试者工作曲线下面积来评估。结果:170例前列腺重复穿刺活检的患者中,前列腺癌的穿刺检出率为31.8%(54/170)。建立的数学模型影响因素包括:患者的年龄、前列腺体积、PSA、f-PSA/t-PSA、PSA上升速度、PSAD、DRE、首次穿刺结果是否为上皮内瘤变。该模型预测价值较高,曲线下面积为82.4%,大于患者PSAD、前列腺体积、PSA上升速度、f-PSA/t-PSA、DRE等单因素的66.9%、72.6%、69.6%、69.3%、58.5%。结论:该数学模型是临床多因素综合分析基础上建立的,可以很好地预测前列腺重复穿刺活检阳性的概率。     

Nomogram for predicting the probability of the positive outcome of prostate biopsies among Ghanaian men

Introduction and objectives

Several existing models have been developed to predict positive prostate biopsy among men undergoing evaluation for prostate cancer (PCa). However, most of these models have come from industrialized countries. We therefore, developed a prostate disease nomogram model to provide a basis for predicting a prostate biopsy outcome by correlating clinical indicators and diagnostic parameters among Ghanaian men.

Screening for prostate cancer without digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound: results after four years in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam

BACKGROUND: Omission of DRE/TRUS as biopsy indication results in fewer unnecessary biopsies, but may increase the risk of missing potentially aggressive prostate cancers (PCs). In 1997, the biopsy indication within the ERSPC was changed from a PSA cut-off of 4.0 ng/ml and/or abnormal DRE/TRUS (group-1) to solely a PSA cut-off of 3.0 ng/ml (group-2). We estimated the effect of omitting DRE/TRUS by comparing the results of a re-screening 4 years after initial screening to the original policy. METHODS: We compared rate and characteristics of detected PCs in the second round in men initially screened in group-1 (N=5,957) or group-2 (N=8,044). Additionally, we compared the rate of interval cancers (ICs) after screening with and without DRE/TRUS. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in second round cancer-detection-rates (group-1, 3.0%; group-2, 2.7%), positive-predictive-values (group-1, 23.9%; group-2, 26.3%), and number of poorly-differentiated tumors (group-1, 2.6%; group-2, 3.8%). Most PCs were clinically confined to the prostate. Eleven ICs were detected in each group (0.18 and 0.14%). CONCLUSIONS: Omitting DRE/TRUS did not result in an increased IC- or PC-detection. However, considering the natural history of PC, the 4-year follow-up may be too short to draw a definitive conclusion.     

An algorithm for prostate cancer detection in a patient population using prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen density

Summary Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the most accurate serum marker for cancer of the prostate (CaP). However, its sensitivity and specificity are suboptimal, especially at values ranging between 4.1 and 10.0 ng/ml (monoclonal), because benign prostatic hypertrophy and hyperplasia (BPH) and CaP frequently coexist in this range. This study was undertaken to determine the value of incorporating prostate volume measurements with serum PSA levels in a quotient (PSA/volume) entitled PSA density (PSAD). A total of 3140 patients were analyzed and stratified by serum PSA, digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal prostate ultrasound (TRUS), TRUS volume determination and PSAD. All patients were referred for evaluation and therefore do not represent a screened population. Patients underwent prostate biopsies when abnormalities in TRUS or DRE were detected. Although both PSA and PSAD have statistical significance when the serum PSA value is 4.0 ng/ml, neither has clinical significance in differentiating BPH from CaP. At serum levels ranging between 4.1 and 10.0 ng/ml, PSA has no ability to differentiate BPH from CaP, whereas PSAD does so with statistical and clinical significance. When the PSA value is between 10.1 and 20.0 ng/ml, only PSAD is statistically significant. When PSA exceeds 20 ng/ml, PSAD is redundant. We conclude that all patients with an abnormality on DRE or TRUS should undergo prostate biopsy. If the PSA value is 4.0 ng/ml, TRUS and PSAD are not warranted and routine biopsy is not recommended. For intermediate PSA levels, 4.1–10.0 ng/ml, TRUS, TRUS prostate volume, and PSAD are important. The use of PSAD provides unique information regarding the need for biopsy and the likelihood of CaP. At PSA levels ranging between 10.1 and 20.0 ng/ml, PSAD will identify those patients who are less likely to have CaP, but all should undergo biopsy. If the PSA value is >20 ng/ml, all patients should undergo a biopsy.     

Clinical, biochemical and pathological features of initial and repeat transrectal ultrasonography prostate biopsy positive patients

BACKGROUND: Using sextant biopsy, 16-41% of prostate cancers were diagnosed on repeat biopsy. The objective of the present study was to compare the differences in the clinical, biochemical and pathological features between patients with positive results on initial and repeat biopsies, with an aim to identify factors that can be used to improve the detection rate of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy of the prostate. METHODS: Between February 2000 and April 2001, 222 patients with a mean age of 64 years (range 38-85) underwent TRUS-guided 10-core prostate biopsy for either abnormal prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels (>4 ng/mL) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE). Of this number, 165 patients underwent their first biopsy, whereas 45 and 12 patients had had one or two previous biopsies, respectively. RESULTS: Prostate cancer detection rates for the initial biopsy group (n = 165), second biopsy group (n = 45) and third biopsy group (n = 12) were 29.7, 23.0 and 41.7%, respectively. Six patients who had a negative first 10-core biopsy underwent a second 10-core biopsy and one patient (16%) was found to have cancer. Apart from total prostate volume, there were no significant statistical differences between the patient age, mean total PSA, PSA density, PSA-transition zone density, DRE and TRUS findings between the initial and repeat biopsy groups of subjects who had cancer. Those who had cancer detected only on repeat biopsies had larger prostate glands (P = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Patients who had cancer detected only on repeat biopsies had bigger prostate glands, supporting the hypothesis that TRUS sextant biopsy as a technique suffers the error of under-sampling in a bigger prostate.     

Value of prostate volume measurement using transabdominal ultrasonography for the improvement of prostate-specific antigen-based cancer detection

PURPOSE: To examine value of prostate-speci fi c antigen (PSA) adjusted by prostate volume measured using transabdominal ultrasonography in prostate cancer detection among men with elevated PSA. METHODS: 238 men aged 79 years or younger with serum PSA levels of 2.0-20.0 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination fi ndings were studied in terms of total and free PSA, prostate volumes with transrectal (TRUS) and transabdominal (TAUS) ultrasonography and transition zone volumes with TRUS prior to transrectal 10-core biopsy. In addition to sole PSA values and the free-to-total PSA ratio, volume-adjusted PSA values, PSA densities determined by TRUS (PSAD(TRUS)), and TAUS (PSAD(TAUS)), and PSA transition zone densities (PSATzD) were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 58 (24.4%) of the 238 men who underwent prostate biopsies. Of the areas under ROC curves (AUC) of studied parameters, PSATzD (AUC 0.751) was the best and signi fi cantly superior to PSAD(TAUS) (AUC 0.664, P = 0.007). However, PSAD(TAUS) exceeded PSA (AUC 0.559, P = 0.004) and showed potential capability of a one-fourth reduction in unnecessary biopsies without spoiling sensitivity (90%). Cancer detection rate was only 4.2% in the 48 patients whose prostate volume in TAUS was > 50 mL and PSAD(TAUS) was < 0.075. CONCLUSIONS: Since PSAD(TRUS) and PSATzD were signi fi cantly superior to PSAD(TAUS), TRUS is feasible as the standard fashion to determine prostate volume in the diagnosis of prostate cancers. However, TAUS is also worthwhile as it can improve the prostate cancer detection using sole PSA, and primary use of TAUS has the potential to reduce the substantial number of unnecessary biopsy safely.     

Early detection of prostate cancer in the ESRD population

BACKGROUND: There are currently no prostate cancer screening guidelines specific to the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population. With this in mind, we evaluated the clinical usefulness of digital rectal examination (DRE), serum total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in predicting prostate cancer in men with ESRD. METHODS: Fifty male ESRD patients age 40 years and older with no prior history of prostate cancer were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent PSA measurement and a DRE followed by a TRUS. PSAD was calculated as the total PSA divided by the prostate volume. Ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies were performed on any patient with 1 or more of the following abnormal findings: a nodule detected on DRE; an abnormal TRUS; PSA > 4.0 ng/ml, or a PSAD > 0.15 ng/ml/cm3. RESULTS: Abnormal findings were detected in 19 patients. Two (4%) had an abnormal DRE, 3 (6%) had PSA > 4.0 ng/ml, 3 (6%) had PSAD > 0.15 ng/ml/cm3 and 16 (32%) had abnormal findings on TRUS. Three patients had 2 abnormal findings and 1 had 3. Of the 15 prostate biopsies performed, 4 (27%) revealed prostate cancer and 3 (20%) high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasm (HGPIN) comprising 8% and 6%, respectively, of the studied population. Of the 4 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, none had abnormal DRE, 2 (50%) had PSA > 4.0 ng/ml (sensitivity = 66.7% and PPV = 50% (p = 0.236)), 3 (75%) had PSAD > 0.15 ng/ml/cm3 (sensitivity = 100% and PPV = 75% (p < 0.018)), and 3 (75%) had abnormal findings on TRUS (sensitivity = 30% and PPV = 75% (p = 1.000)). CONCLUSION: Routine screening with PSA and DRE does not seem sensitive enough to predict the presence of the disease. Although TRUS detected abnormalities in 16 patients (32%), sensitivity was very low (30%). In our patients, PSAD increased the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of detecting prostate cancers compared to PSA alone.     

Elevated serum prostate specific antigen levels in conjunction with an initial prostatic biopsy negative for carcinoma: who should undergo a repeat biopsy?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome of repeated prostatic biopsies in men attending with suspected prostate cancer but an initial negative biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had undergone two or more transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies were identified from the Hospital Information Support System database. Indications for TRUS were a raised prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (>4.0 ng/mL), with or without an abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE). Sextant prostate biopsies plus biopsies of any suspicious hypoechoic area or area of DRE abnormality were obtained for histology. Forty-eight patients underwent repeat TRUS-guided prostatic biopsies (mean age 67.5, sd 7. 25, range 53-82 years). RESULTS: The mean (sd, median, range) PSA level was 16.9 (13.5, 11.6, 5.2-61.8) ng/mL. Fifteen patients (31%) had carcinoma on repeat biopsy, 11 after the second and four after a third biopsy. The positive repeat biopsy rate was 24% where the PSA level was 4.0-9.9 ng/mL, 33% if the level was 10.0-19.9 ng/mL and 39% if it was >/=20.0 ng/mL. There was no significant difference in age or initial PSA concentration between those men with positive and those with negative repeat biopsies. However, patients with cancer had significantly higher PSA levels before repeat biopsy than at first biopsy (P=0.0043) and had greater PSA velocities than had patients with no diagnosis of cancer (P=0.0067). CONCLUSION: Where sufficient clinical suspicion exists, despite an initial negative biopsy, repeat TRUS-guided prostate biopsies should be carried out to exclude carcinoma of the prostate.     

Volume-adjusted prostate-specific antigen (PSA) variables in detecting impalpable prostate cancer in men with PSA levels of 2-4 ng/mL: transabdominal measurement makes a significant contribution

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels adjusted according to prostate volume improve prostate cancer detection using transrected biopsies in men with PSA levels of 2-4 ng/mL, and benign findings on a digital rectal examination (DRE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men aged < or = 79 years and with serum PSA levels of 2-4 ng/mL and normal DRE findings were prospectively enrolled. Eligible patients were recommended for transrectal prostate biopsies after measuring prostate volumes with transrectal (TRUS) and transabdominal (TAUS) ultrasonography, and transition zone volumes with TRUS. In addition to PSA levels and the free-to-total PSA ratio, volume-adjusted PSA levels, PSA densities determined by TRUS (PSAD(TRUS)), and TAUS (PSAD(TAUS)), and PSA transition zone densities (PSATzD) were compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 31 (22%) of the 139 men who had prostate biopsies. The area under the curve (AUC) of PSAD(TRUS) (0.796) and PSATzD (0.792) was similar and significantly greater than that of PSA (AUC 0.588) and the free-to-total PSA ratio (AUC 0.658). PSAD(TAUS) was a significantly better indicator of prostate cancer than PSA levels alone (P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: As predictors of prostate cancer, there were no significant differences between PSAD(TRUS) and PSATzD. Although PSAD(TAUS) was worse than PSA variables adjusted by total and transition zone prostate volumes determined by TRUS, it was a better predictor than the PSA value alone in men with a low PSA level. These results indicate that TAUS is worthwhile where the routine use of TRUS before biopsy is difficult.     

Population-based screening for prostate cancer by measuring total serum prostate-specific antigen in Iran

OBJECTIVE: To report the results from an Iranian large population-based randomized study of screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to detect prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 3758 Iranian men older than 40 years were mass checked by PSA-based screening. Men with an abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) and serum total PSA level of greater than 4 ng/mL, underwent transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided extended prostate biopsy. RESULTS: The PSA value (mean +/- standard deviation, SD) in all men without prostate cancer was 1.6 +/- 1.1 ng/mL and in those with cancer 18 +/- 44.8 ng/mL (P = 0.001). PSA values increased with age. In those aged 40-49, 50-59, 60-69 and > or = 70 years, the mean +/- SD PSA values were 1.3 +/- 0.7, 1.4 +/- 0.8, 1.8 +/- 1 and 2.2 +/- 1.6 ng/mL, respectively. Among the screened men, 323 (8.6%) had a serum PSA concentration greater than 4 ng/mL. Of patients who underwent prostate biopsy (230, 71.2%), 129 (positive predictive value, 56.1%) had prostate cancer. Additionally, nine cancers were detected among 16 patients with PSA of less than 4 ng/mL who had a doubtful DRE finding. The overall cancer detection rate was 3.6%; 1.4% at 40-49, 1.6% at 50-59, 4.2% at 60-69 and 12.9% at >/=70 years. Conventional systematic sextant biopsies, which accounted for six of the 10 cores in our biopsy scheme, detected 98 (71%) of the cancers. CONCLUSIONS: The Iranian male population develops prostate cancer quite commonly if their serum PSA levels are greater than 4.0 ng/mL. In this study, 65.9% of the detected cancers were clinically significant. The conventional systematic sextant technique may be inappropriate for detection of all prostate cancers. The results need to be confirmed in other randomized trials.     

ROLE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AND DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION IN THE DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a kallikrein-like serine protease that is secreted exclusively by the epithelial cells of all types of prostatic tissue, benign and malignant. Its serum concentration is raised in men with prostatic disease including cancer. We have evaluated its usefulness in the diagnosis of prostate cancer by measuring serum PSA concentrations in 260 men aged 50 years or over. All had abnormalities at digital rectal examination (DRE) involving suspected cancer, signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia and equivocal findings on DRE, and miscellaneous other conditions, including hematospermia, chronic prostatitis and microscopic hematuria. Transrectal prostatic needle biopsies were performed in the men with abnormal findings on DRE or elevated serum PSA (above 4ng/ml). Serum PSA ranged from 4.0 to 9.9ng/ml in 14 (5%) of the 260 men. Four of the men in this group (31%) who underwent prostatic biopsy had prostate cancer. Serum PSA levels greater than or equal to 10.0 ng/ml were found in 8 (3%) of the 260 men. 5 of these 8 (63%) who underwent prostatic biopsy had cancer. If DRE alone had been used to screen the men having biopsies, 4 of the 10 cancers (40%) would have been missed. If PSA alone had been used to screen these men, only 1 of the 10 cancers would have been missed. Serum PSA measurement was more reliable than DRE for detecting prostate cancer. Since these two methods do not always detect the same malignant tumor, the combined use of DRE and PSA testing affords a more complete evaluation of the prostate gland for malignant involvement.     

Prostate specific antigen adjusted for transition zone epithelial volume: the powerful predictor for the detection of prostate cancer on repeat biopsy

PURPOSE: The indications for repeat prostate biopsy for persistently increased prostate specific antigen (PSA) in men with prostate cancer never detected on previous biopsy are not clear. In this study we determined that PSA adjusted for transition zone (TZ) epithelial volume is the most powerful predictor for detecting prostate cancer on repeat biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Repeat prostate biopsies including additional TZ cores were performed in 75 men with PSA between 4.0 and 10.0 ng/ml. TZ epithelial volume was calculated by multiplying TZ volume by the percent of epithelium, which was measured by morphometric analysis using image analysis computer software. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was detected on repeat biopsy in 19 of the 75 patients. Patients with prostate cancer had a significant smaller percent area of epithelium or glandular lumen than those without cancer. In patients without prostate cancer TZ epithelial volume significantly correlated with total PSA. According to ROC analysis PSA adjusted for TZ epithelial volume had the greatest AUC for cancer detection (0.879). This parameter was able to avoid more than 90% of unnecessary repeat biopsies with 90% sensitivity. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that PSA complex adjusted for TZ epithelial volume was the significant independent predictor of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: PSA adjusted for TZ epithelial volume is the most powerful predictor of cancer in men who have undergone previous negative prostate biopsies and in whom PSA remains between 4.0 and 10.0 ng/ml.     

USEFULNESS OF DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION, SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, TRANSRECTAL ULTRAS ONOGRAPHY AND SYSTEMATIC PROSTATE BIOPSY FOR THE DETECTION OF ORGAN-CONFINED PROSTATE CANCER

The detection rate of organ-confined prostate cancer by digital rectal examination (DRE), serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) of the prostate, as well as the value of a directed, guided transrectal core biopsy for the prostate (TRUS-guided biopsy) combined with systematic biopsy, were evaluated. The subjects were 171 patients with urinary symptoms suggestive of prostatic disease excluding those with clinical stage C and D prostate cancer. Twenty-five patients (14.6%) had prostate cancer, 127 (74.2%) had benign prostate hypertrophy, four (2.3%) had prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, eleven (6.4%) had inflammation, and four (2.3%) had normal prostate tissue. The incidence of detection of hypoechoic findings by TRUS in the patients in whom nodules were detected by DRE or who had elevated serum PSA was higher than that in patients with negative diagnostic findings. In 22 of the 25 patients with prostate cancer, the cancer was detected by recognition of a hypoechoic area on TRUS. In 10 of these 22 patients, prostate cancer was also detected by systematic biopsy in isoechoic areas. Prostate cancer was detected by systematic biopsy in three patients without hypoechoic findings. The positive predictive value for patients with abnormal findings on all three tests was 64.3%, which is significantly higher than that for patients with any other combination of findings (p < 0.05). Our results indicate that the combination of DRE, serum PSA and TRUS is useful for the detection of organ-confined prostate cancer, and that TRUS and TRUS-guided prostate biopsy combined with systematic biopsy should be performed in patients with abnormal findings for both DRE and PSA. Our results also demonstrate that systematic biopsy is useful for the detention of prostate cancer from the isoechoic area visualized by TRUS.