Comparative outcomes for three‐dimensional conformal versus intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for esophageal cancer

Emerging data suggests a benefit for using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the management of esophageal cancer. We retrospectively reviewed patients treated at our institution who received definitive or preoperative chemoradiation with either IMRT or 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) between October 2000 and January 2012. Kaplan Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model were used to evaluate survival outcomes. We evaluated a total of 232 patients (138 IMRT, 94 3DCRT) who received a median dose of 50.4 Gy (range, 44–64.8) to gross disease. Median follow up for all patients, IMRT patients alone, and 3DCRT patients alone was 18.5 (range, 2.5–124.2), 16.5 (range, 3–59), and 25.9 months (range, 2.5–124.2), respectively. We observed no significant difference based on radiation technique (3DCRT vs. IMRT) with respect to median overall survival (OS) (median 29 vs. 32 months; P = 0.74) or median relapse free survival (median 20 vs. 25 months; P = 0.66). On multivariable analysis (MVA), surgical resection resulted in improved OS (HR 0.444; P < 0.0001). Superior OS was also associated on MVA with stage I/II disease (HR 0.523; P = 0.010) and tumor length ≤5 cm (HR 0.567; P = 0.006). IMRT was also associated on univariate analysis with a significant decrease in acute weight loss (mean 6% + 4.3% vs 9% + 7.4%, P = 0.012) and on MVA with a decrease in objective grade ≥3 toxicity, defined as any hospitalization, feeding tube, or >20% weight loss (OR 0.51; P = 0.050). Our data suggest that while IMRT‐based chemoradiation for esophageal cancer does not impact survival there was significantly less toxicity. In the IMRT group there was significant decrease in weight loss and grade ≥3 toxicity compared to 3DCRT.     

Outcomes of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation using intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma

This study looks at toxicity and survival data when chemoradiation (CRT) is delivered using intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) after induction chemotherapy. Forty‐one patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with IMRT from March 2007 to May 2009 at Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center were analyzed. All patients received induction chemotherapy prior to CRT. Thirty‐nine percent (n = 16) of patients underwent surgical resection less than 4 months after completing CRT. Patients were predominantly male (78%), with a median age of 68 years (range 32–85 years). The majority of acute treatment‐related toxicity was hematologic or gastrointestinal, with 17% of patients having grade 3+ hematologic toxicity and 12% of patients having grade 3+ gastrointestinal toxicity. Only two patients developed grade 2–3 pneumonitis (5%) and 5 patients experienced post‐operative pulmonary complications (29%). Eight patients (20%) required a treatment break. With a median follow up of 41 months for surviving patients, 2‐year overall survival was 61%, and the cumulative incidences of local failure (LF) and distant metastases were 40% and 51%, respectively. This rate of LF was reduced to 13% in patients who underwent surgical resection. Surgery and younger age were significant predictors of decreased time to LF on univariate analysis. Induction chemotherapy followed by CRT using IMRT in the treatment of esophageal cancer is well tolerated and is not associated with an elevated risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. The use of IMRT may allow for integration of more intensified systemic therapy or radiation dose escalation for esophageal adenocarcinoma, ultimately improving outcomes for patients with this aggressive disease.     

Comparison of salvage chemoradiation versus salvage surgery for recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after definitive radiochemotherapy or radiotherapy alone

A consensus treatment strategy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients who recur after definitive radiochemotherapy/radiotherapy has not been established. This study compared the outcomes in ESCC patients who underwent salvage surgery, salvage chemoradiation (CRT) or best supportive care (BSC) for local recurrence. Ninety‐five patients with clinical stage I to III ESCC who had completely responded to the initial definitive radiochemotherapy or radiotherapy alone and developed local recurrence were enrolled in this study. Fifty‐one of them received salvage esophagectomy, and R0 resection was performed in 41 patients, 36 underwent salvage CRT, and the remaining eight patients received BSC only. The 5‐year overall survival was 4.6% for the 87 patients receiving salvage surgery or CRT, while all patients in the BSC group died within 12.0 months, the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.018). The 1‐, 3‐, 5‐year survival rates in the salvage surgery and salvage CRT groups were 45.1%, 20.0%, 6.9% and 51.7%, 12.2%, 3.1%, respectively, there was no difference of overall survival between the two groups (P = 0.697). Patients also presented with lymph node relapse had inferior survival compared to those with isolated local tumor recurrence after salvage therapy. In the salvage surgery group, infections occurred in eight patients, and three developed anastomotic leakage. In the salvage CRT group, grade 2–4 esophagitis and radiation pneumonitis was observed in 19 and 3 patients, respectively. Seven patients (19.4%) developed esophagotracheal fistula or esophageal perforation. This study of salvage CRT versus salvage surgery for recurrent ESCC after definitive radiochemotherapy or radiotherapy alone did not demonstrate a statistically significant survival difference, but the frequency of complications including esophagotracheal fistula and esophageal perforation following salvage CRT was high.     

Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS system) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing resection

Background  The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) scoring system was designed on the hypothesis that the balance between the patient’s physiological reverse capacity and the surgical stress of operation was important in the development of postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the E-PASS scoring system could predict the occurrence of complications after elective esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, including salvage esophagectomy. Methods  E-PASS predictor equations were applied retrospectively to 142 patients who had undergone esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [110 patients without preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), 15 patients with neoadjuvant CRT followed by planned esophagectomy, and 17 patients with definitive CRT followed by salvage esophagectomy]. The incidence rates of postoperative complications were compared with the preoperative risk score (PRS), surgical stress score (SSS), and comprehensive risk score (CRS) of the E-PASS scoring system. Results  Of the 142 patients, 43 (30%) had postoperative complications. The incidence of postoperative complications increased as the CRS score increased. Patients with a CRS > 1.0 were at a particularly high risk of postoperative complications. Definitive CRT increased the incidence of postoperative complications, and the SSS and CRS of patients with definitive CRT were significantly higher than those of patients without preoperative CRT or with neoadjuvant CRT. Conclusions  The E-PASS scoring system was useful in predicting complications after elective esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. The SSS of the E-PASS scoring system could also reflect the maximum invasiveness of salvage esophagectomy.     

Salvage chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal carcinomas

‘Salvage chemoradiotherapy (CRT)’ was introduced in 2005 to treat thoracic esophageal carcinomas deemed unresectable based on the intraoperative findings. The therapeutic concept is as follows: the surgical plan is changed to an operation that aims to achieve curability by the subsequent definitive CRT. For this purpose, the invading tumor is resected as much as possible, and systematic lymph node dissection is performed except for in the area around the bilateral recurrent nerves. The definitive CRT should be started as soon as possible and should be performed as planned. We hypothesized that this treatment would be feasible and provide good clinical effects. We herein verified this hypothesis. Twenty‐seven patients who received salvage CRT were enrolled in the study, and their clinical course, therapeutic response, and prognosis were evaluated. The patients who had poor oral intake because of esophageal stenosis were able to eat solid food soon after the operation. The radiation field could be narrowed after surgery, and this might have contributed to the high rate of finishing the definitive CRT as planned. As a result, the overall response rate was 74.1%, and 48.1% of the patients had a complete response. No patient experienced fistula formation. The 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year overall survival rates were 66.5%, 35.2%, and 35.2%, respectively. Salvage CRT had clinical benefits, such as the fact that patients became able to have oral intake, that fistula formation could be prevented, that the adverse events associated with the definitive CRT could be reduced, and that prognosis of the patients was satisfactory. Although the rate of recurrent nerve paralysis was relatively high even after the suspension of aggressive bilateral recurrent nerve lymph node dissection, and the rate of the progressive disease after the definitive CRT was high, salvage CRT appears to provide some advantages for the patients who would otherwise not have other treatment options following a non‐curative and residual operation.     

Clinical significance of salvage esophagectomy for remnant or recurrent cancer following definitive chemoradiotherapy

Background

The purpose of this study was to clarify the effect of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for esophageal cancer on the postoperative course, and to determine the clinical significance of salvage esophagectomy after definitive CRT.

Methods

Based on their preoperative treatment, 477 patients with esophageal cancer were classified into three groups: 253 patients who received surgery alone (Group I), 197 who received planned CRT (30?C45?Gy, Group II), and 27 who received a salvage esophagectomy (radiation ??60?Gy, Group III).

Results

Postoperative complications developed in 25, 40, and 59% of the patients in Groups I, II, and III, respectively, with pulmonary complications developing in 10, 15, and 30%, and anastomotic leakage developing in 13, 23, and 37%, respectively. Mortality rates were 2.4, 2.0, and 7.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative therapy to be an independent factor associated with postoperative risks: the odds ratios (ORs) of Groups II and III compared to Group I were 1.8 and 4.0 for pulmonary complications, while they were 1.9 and 2.8, respectively, for anastomotic leakage. No critical complications developed in the 14 patients who received salvage surgery performed with strict surgical indications after 2005. The survival of Group III was not significantly different from that of Groups I and II. Most patients who received an R1/R2 resection after definitive CRT died within 2?years after salvage surgery.

Conclusions

Preoperative CRT is associated with postoperative complications especially in patients with R2 resection, while long-term survival can be achieved after R0 resections. Salvage surgery should be considered for carefully selected patients in whom R0 resection can be achieved.     

A comparison of surgery and radiation therapy for cT1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Surgery and radiation therapy have been used to treat esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, treatment outcomes have not yet been extensively investigated. The aim of this study was to compare surgery and radiation therapy for clinical T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. A total of 67 clinical T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients were treated between January 1997 and December 2005; 29 had undergone radical esophagectomy (surgery group) and 38 were treated with definitive radiation therapy (radiation group). The mean patient age was lower in the surgery group than in the radiation group. In surgery group, respiratory complications, anastomotic leaks, recurrent nerve palsies, and anastomotic stenosis occurred in 7, 8, 6, and 5 patients, respectively. In radiation group, leucopenia, esophagitis, pericarditis were observed in 15, 3, and 3 patients, respectively. The 5‐year overall survival rate for the surgery group was 68.9%, and 74.3% for the radiation group. There were no significant difference between groups (P= 0.3780). The 5‐year relapse‐free survival rate in the surgery group was 61.8% and 38.8% in the radiation group. The relapse‐free survival rate was significantly higher in the surgery group than in the radiation group (P= 0.0051). The 5‐year overall and relapse‐free survival rates for tumors invaded into but not through the muscularis mucosa were 83.3% and 75.0%, respectively, in the surgery group and 78.8% and 33.3%, respectively, in the radiation group. There were no significant differences. The 5‐year overall survival rates for patients with tumors that invaded the submucosal layer was 64.9% in the surgery group and 66.5% in the radiation group. This difference was not significant (P= 0.8712). The 5‐year relapse‐free survival rate in the surgery group (56.0%) was significantly higher than that in the radiation group (41.8%; P= 0.0219). In conclusion, surgery may become a standard treatment for cT1 esophageal cancer that can offer longer relapse‐free survival, particularly for patients with tumors that invade the submucosa.     

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy versus definitive chemoradiotherapy in resectable stage II/III (T1-3N0, 1M0) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background There are two intensive modalities for the treatment of resectable esophageal carcinoma: esophagectomy and definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Esophagectomy with preoperative CRT was retrospectively compared with CRT alone in resectable stage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods Seventy-four patients with resectable stage II/III (T1-3N0, 1M0) esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were treated with preoperative CRT by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 700 mg/m² on days 1 to 5, nedaplatin 80 mg/m² on day 1, and concurrent radiation for a total of 30 Gy in 3 weeks. If patients decided to undergo surgery, esophagectomy from the thoracoabdominal approach was carried out 6 weeks after the completion of CRT (CRT + Surg group, n = 51). If patients decided not to undergo surgery, they were treated with one more course of CRT (CRT-alone group, n = 23). Results There was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups (P = 0.1006), whereas the disease-free survival in the CRT + Surg group was improved compared with the CRT-alone group (P = 0.0186). In the patients with clinical stage III carcinoma or with regional lymph node metastasis, the overall survival rate was significantly improved in the CRT + Surg group compared with the CRT-alone group. The rate of local failures in the CRT + Surg group was significantly lower compared with the CRT-alone group (P = 0.0011). Conclusions Preoperative CRT followed by esophagectomy provides better local control, but does not prolong overall survival, compared with definitive CRT. However, in clinical stage III or N1, esophagectomy with preoperative CRT could contribute to the improvement of survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.     

Reduced toxicity with three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy or intensity‐modulated radiotherapy compared with conventional two‐dimensional radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a secondary analysis of data from four prospective clinical trials

We conducted a retrospective analysis to assess the toxicity and long‐term survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) or intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus conventional two‐dimensional radiotherapy (2DRT). All data in the present study were based on four prospective clinical trials conducted at our institution from 1996 to 2004 and included 308 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with 2DRT or 3DCRT/IMRT. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 254 patients were included in the analysis. Of these patients, 158 were treated with 2DRT, whereas 96 were treated with 3DCRT/IMRT. The rates of ≥Grade3 acute toxicity of the esophagus and lung were 11.5% versus 28.5% (P = 0.002) and 5.2% versus 10.8% (P = 0.127) in the 3DCRT/IMRT and 2DRT groups, respectively. The incidences of ≥Grade 3 late toxicity of the esophagus and lungs were 3.1% versus 10.7% (P = 0.028) and 3.1% versus 5.7% (P = 0.127) in the 3DCRT/IMRT and 2DRT groups, respectively. The 1‐year, 3‐year and 5‐year estimated overall survival rates were 81%, 38% and 34% in the 3DCRT/IMRT group and 79%, 44% and 31% in the 2DRT group, respectively (P = 0.628). The 1‐year, 3‐year and 5‐year local control rates were 88%, 71% and 66% in the 3DCRT/IMRT group and 84%, 66% and 60% in the 2DRT group, respectively (P = 0.412). Fewer incidences of acute and late toxicities were observed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with 3DCRT/IMRT compared with those treated with 2DRT. No significant survival benefit was observed with the use of 3DCRT/IMRT.     

Long-term efficacy of perioperative chemoradiotherapy on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

AIM: To investigate the role of perioperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the treatment of locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: Using preoperative computed tomography (CT)-based staging criteria, 238 patients with ESCC (stage ⅡⅢ ) were enrolled in this prospective study between January 1997 and June 2004. With informed consent, patients were randomized into 3 groups: preoperative CRT (80 cases), postoperative CRT (78 cases) and surgery alone (S) (80 cases). The 1-, 3-...     

Obesity and outcomes in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma

Body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for comorbid illnesses and cancer development. It was hypothesized that obesity status affects disease outcomes and treatment‐related toxicities in esophageal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). From March 2002 to April 2010, 405 patients with non‐metastatic esophageal carcinoma at MD Anderson Cancer Center treated with either definitive or neoadjuvant CRT were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized as either obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²) or nonobese (BMI < 25 kg/m²). Progression‐free survival and overall survival times were examined using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. One hundred fifteen (28.4%) patients were classified as nonobese and 290 (71.6%) as obese. Obese patients were more likely than others to have several comorbid diseases (P < 0.001), adenocarcinoma located distally (P < 0.001), and have undergone surgery (P = 0.004). Obesity was not associated with either worse operative morbidity/mortality (P > 0.05) or worse positron emission tomography tumor response (P = 0.46) on univariate analysis, nor with worse pathologic complete response (P = 0.98) on multivariate analysis. There was also no difference in overall survival, locoregional control, or metastasis‐free survival between obese and nonobese patients (P = 0.86). However, higher BMI was associated with reduced risk of chemoradiation‐induced high‐grade esophagitis (P = 0.021), esophageal stricture (P < 0.001), and high‐grade hematologic toxicity (P < 0.001). In esophageal cancer patients treated with CRT, obesity is not predictive of poorer disease outcomes or operative morbidities; instead, data suggest it may be associated with decreased risk of acute chemotherapy‐ and radiotherapy‐related treatment toxicities.     

Comparative study between endoscopic ultrasonography and positron emission tomography‐computed tomography in staging patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Treatment strategy of esophageal cancer mainly depends on accurate staging. At present, no single ideal staging modality is superior to another in preoperative tumor‐node‐metastasis (TNM) staging of patients with esophageal cancer. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and positron emission tomography‐computed tomography (PET‐CT) for staging of esophageal cancer. We retrospectively studied 118 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) over a near 3‐year period between January 2005 and November 2008 at a tertiary hospital in Taiwan. Patients were separated into two groups: without neoadjuvant CRT (group 1, n= 28) and with CRT (group 2, n= 90). Medical records of demographic data and reports of EUS and PET‐CT of patients before surgery were reviewed. A database of clinical staging by EUS and PET‐CT was compared with one of pathological staging. The accuracies of T staging by EUS in groups 1 and 2 were 85.2% and 34.9%. The accuracies of N staging by EUS in groups 1 and 2 were 55.6% and 39.8%. The accuracies of T and N staging by means of PET‐CT scan were 100% and 54.5% in group 1, and were 69.4% and 86.1% in group 2, respectively. In group 2, 38 of 90 patients (42.2%) achieved pathologic complete remission. Among them, two of 34 (5.9%) and 12 of 17 (70.6%) patients were identified as tumor‐free by post‐CRT EUS and PET‐CT, respectively. EUS is useful for initial staging of esophageal cancer. PET‐CT is a more reliable modality for monitoring treatment response and restaging. Furthermore, the accuracy of PET‐CT with regard to N staging is higher in patients who have undergone CRT than those who have not.     

Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens in patients with potentially curable esophageal carcinoma

The implementation of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in esophageal cancer (EC) patients has led to improved survival rates. Worldwide, different CRT regimens are applied. It is unknown how these regimens relate to each other regarding efficacy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the preferred regimen regarding toxicity of, response to CRT, and long‐term survival after esophagectomy in EC patients. EC patients in two centers who underwent CRT with different regimens prior to surgery were included in this study. CRT consisted of 50.4Gy combined with two cycles of cisplatin and 5‐FU(center A), or 41.4Gy combined with five cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel (center B). Toxicity, response to therapy and long‐term survival were compared between groups. One hundred sisty‐five patients were included. Forty‐one percent of patients in center A developed ≥1 toxicity ≥ grade 3 versus 25% in center B (P = 0.025). CRT with a cisplatin‐based regimen was an independent predictor for development of toxicity ≥ grade 3 (P = 0.043). There were no differences in response between both regimens (P = 0.904). Three‐year survival was 61% (A) versus 57% (B) (P = 0.725). The carboplatin/paclitaxel/41.4Gy regimen causes less toxicity compared to the cisplatin/5‐FU/50.4Gy regimen with nonsignificant differences in response rates and long‐term survival; therefore our results support this regimen to be the preferred regimen for EC patients.     

Feasibility of endoscopic mucosal resection as salvage treatment for patients with local failure after definitive chemoradiotherapy for stage IB,II, and III esophageal squamous cell cancer

Local failure after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for stage IB, II, and III esophageal cancer is one of the causes of poor outcome. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an effective treatment for superficial esophageal cancer. However, its feasibility as a salvage treatment for local recurrent or residual tumors after definitive CRT for stage IB, II, and III esophageal cancer remains unclear. Between January 2000 and February 2008, 274 patients with stage IB, II, and III esophageal squamous cell cancer excluding T4 received definitive CRT at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan. Of these patients, nine patients with local recurrence after achieving complete response and two patients with residual tumor underwent salvage EMR. The technique of salvage EMR involved a strip biopsy method. We retrospectively reviewed the 11 patients (13 lesions). Characteristics of all 11 patients were as follows: median age of 69 (range: 45–78); male/female: 10/1; baseline clinical stage (Union for International Cancer Control 7th) IB/IIA/IIB/III: 1/3/7/0. The depth of resected tumor was limited to the mucosal layer in seven lesions and submucosal in six lesions. En bloc resection was performed on six lesions (46%). The vertical margin was free of cancer cells in 11 lesions (84.6%). No major complications, such as hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion and perforation, were experienced. At a median follow‐up period of 38.9 months (range: 5.3–94 months) after salvage EMR, no recurrence was detected in six patients (54%). Local recurrence was detected in five patients (27%). Of these patients, two had lung metastasis simultaneously, and one was also detected lung metastasis 2 months after the detection of local recurrence. The 5‐year survival rate after salvage EMR was 41.6%. Salvage EMR is a feasible treatment option for local recurrent or residual lesions after definitive chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy for stage IB, II, and III esophageal squamous cell cancer.     

Clinical features and treatment of patients with esophageal cancer and a history of gastrectomy: a multicenter,questionnaire survey in Kyushu,Japan

It is still controversial whether patients with a history of gastrectomy have high risk of esophageal carcinogenesis. On the other hand, the treatment strategy for esophageal cancer patients after gastrectomy is complicated. The association between histories of gastrectomy and esophageal carcinogenesis was retrospectively analyzed, and the treatment of esophageal cancer patients after gastrectomy was evaluated based on questionnaire data collected from multiple centers in Kyushu, Japan. The initial subject population comprised 205 esophageal cancer patients after gastrectomy. Among them, 108 patients underwent curative surgical treatment, and 70 patients underwent chemoradiation therapy (CRT). The time between gastrectomy and esophageal cancer development was longer in peptic ulcer patients (28.3 years) than in gastric cancer patients (9.6 years). There were no differences in the location of esophageal cancer according to the gastrectomy reconstruction method. There were no significant differences in the clinical background characteristics between patients with and without a history of gastrectomy. Among the 108 patients in the surgery group, the 5‐year overall survival rates for stages I (n = 30), II (n = 18), and III (n = 60) were 68.2%, 62.9%, and 32.1%, respectively. In the CRT group, the 5‐year overall survival rate of stage I (n = 29) was 82.6%, but there were no 5‐year survivors in other stages. The 5‐year overall survival rate of patients with CR (n = 33) or salvage surgery (n = 10) was 61.2% or 36%, respectively. For the treatment of gastrectomized esophageal cancer patients, surgery or CRT is recommended for stage I, and surgery with or without adjuvant therapy is the main central treatment in advanced stages, with surgery for stage II, neoadjuvant therapy + surgery for stage III, and CRT + salvage surgery for any stage, if the patient's condition permits.     

Overexpression of cyclooxygenase‐2 is associated with chemoradiotherapy resistance and prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients

Our objective was to investigate whether cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) expression can predict the patient's response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and ensuing prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The clinicopathological and follow‐up data of 112 patients with ESCC who underwent CRT from January 2001 to June 2006 were analyzed retrospectively. The immunohistochemical expression level of COX‐2 was examined for all biopsy specimens of primary tumors, and the correlation of COX‐2 expression with the patient's response to CRT and prognosis was examined. COX‐2 positive immunostaining was detected in 111 (99.1%) of the patients, including overexpression in 54 (48.2%) patients and low expression in 58 (51.8%) of the patients. The response of tumors with a low level expression of COX‐2 (70.7%, 41/58) was significantly higher than that of tumors with COX‐2 overexpression (42.6%, 23/54; P = 0.003). Patients with a low level of COX‐2 expression had a higher downstaged rate than those with a high level of COX‐2 expression (9/13 vs 2/8), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.08). In the definitive CRT group (91 cases), COX‐2 overexpression was significantly associated with poor 3‐year overall survival (P = 0.028). Multivariate analysis showed that only metastatic stage (nonregional node metastasis) was an independent prognosis factor. The assessment of COX‐2 status may provide additional information to identify ESCC patients with poor chances of response to CRT and potential candidates for more individualized treatment.     

Trends and outcomes in the use of surgery and radiation for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer: a propensity score adjusted analysis of the surveillance,epidemiology, and end results registry from 1998 to 2008

We examined outcomes and trends in surgery and radiation use for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, for whom optimal treatment isn't clear. Trends in surgery and radiation for patients with T1‐T3N1M0 squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the mid or distal esophagus in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 1998 to 2008 were analyzed using generalized linear models including year as predictor; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results doesn't record chemotherapy data. Local treatment was unimodal if patients had only surgery or radiation and bimodal if they had both. Five‐year cancer‐specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using propensity‐score adjusted Cox proportional‐hazard models. Overall 5‐year survival for the 3295 patients identified (mean age 65.1 years, standard deviation 11.0) was 18.9% (95% confidence interval: 17.3–20.7). Local treatment was bimodal for 1274 (38.7%) and unimodal for 2021 (61.3%) patients; 1325 (40.2%) had radiation alone and 696 (21.1%) underwent only surgery. The use of bimodal therapy (32.8–42.5%, P = 0.01) and radiation alone (29.3–44.5%, P < 0.001) increased significantly from 1998 to 2008. Bimodal therapy predicted improved CSS (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.68, P < 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.58, P < 0.001) compared with unimodal therapy. For the first 7 months (before survival curve crossing), CSS after radiation therapy alone was similar to surgery alone (HR: 0.86, P = 0.12) while OS was worse for surgery only (HR: 0.70, P = 0.001). However, worse CSS (HR: 1.43, P < 0.001) and OS (HR: 1.46, P < 0.001) after that initial timeframe were found for radiation therapy only. The use of radiation to treat locally advanced mid and distal esophageal cancers increased from 1998 to 2008. Survival was best when both surgery and radiation were used.     

Utility of weekly docetaxel combined with preoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer from pathological analysis

Esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) is a high‐grade carcinoma that is treated with multidisciplinary approaches, including chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery. Despite some success with these therapies, overall survival remains poor. In order to investigate a newer CRT regimen, we designed a comparative study to evaluate preoperative CRT using docetaxel (DOC) or 5‐Fluorouracil and cisplatin (FU+CDDP [FP] therapy) for treatment of resectable ESCC. In a retrospective review of patients with resectable, locally advanced ESCC, 95 patients received preoperative CRT between 2001 and 2007. CRT was administered using either FP (n = 40) or DOC (n = 55). Pathological response and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Hazard ratios and time‐to‐event analyses were used to assess outcomes; the ratios were controlled by multivariate logistic regression analysis of potential prognostic factors, and survival was presented with Kaplan–Meier curves. In the FP group, a significant curative effect was observed on the basis of pathological examination of postoperative lesions. However, the DOC group presented a significantly better prognosis on the basis of cumulative survival rates. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of five or more lymph node metastases was an independent predictor of reduced survival. Patients with lymph node metastasis exhibited a better prognosis in the DOC group than those in the FP group. Preoperative CRT for locally advanced esophageal cancer using DOC results in similar or better long‐term outcomes compared with FP‐based CRT. Therefore, CRT using DOC is a promising therapy option for esophageal cancer.     

Dietician‐delivered intensive nutritional support is associated with a decrease in severe postoperative complications after surgery in patients with esophageal cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of dietician‐delivered intensive nutritional support (INS) on postoperative outcome in patients with esophageal cancer. Approximately 50–80% of patients with esophageal cancer are malnourished at the time of diagnosis. Malnutrition enhances the risk of postoperative complications, resulting in delay of postoperative recovery and impairment of quality of life. Sixty‐five patients with esophageal cancer were included. All patients who received surgery (n = 28) in the time frame between March 2009 and April 2010, the first year after the start of INS, were included in the INS intervention group. The control group (n = 37) consisted of patients who received surgery during the 3 years before the start of INS. Logistic regression analysis was used to compare differences in severity of postoperative complications using the Dindo classification. Linear regression was applied to evaluate differences in preoperative weight change. The adjusted odds ratio for developing serious complications after surgery of INS compared with the control group was 0.23 (95% confidence interval: 0.053–0.97; P = 0.045). Benefit was mainly observed in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy before esophagectomy (n = 35). The INS program furthermore resulted in a relative preoperative weight gain in comparison with the control group of +4.8% (P = 0.009, adjusted) in these neoadjuvant‐treated patients. This study shows that dietician‐delivered INS preserves preoperative weight and decreases severe postoperative complications in patients with esophageal cancer.     

Salvage radiation therapy and chemoradiation therapy for postoperative locoregional recurrence of esophageal cancer

The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the efficacy of salvage radiation therapy (RT) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for locoregional recurrence (LR) of esophageal cancer after curative surgery. Forty‐two patients who received salvage RT or CRT for LR of esophageal cancer after curative surgery between November 2000 and May 2012 were reviewed. The intended RT regimen was 60 Gy in 30 fractions combined with concurrent platinum‐based chemotherapy. Median follow‐up periods were 17.9 months for all evaluable patients and 28.2 months for patients still alive (19 patients) at analysis time. The 1‐, 2‐, and 3‐year survival rates were 81.2 ± 6.4%, 51.3 ± 8.6%, and 41.1 ± 8.7%, respectively, with a median survival time of 24.3 ± 4.1 months. Out of 41 evaluable patients, 16 patients (39%) were alive beyond 2 years from salvage therapy. However, univariate analyses for overall survival showed no significant prognostic factor. Grade 3 or higher leukocytopenia was observed in 46% of the patients. Salvage RT or CRT for LR after surgery for esophageal cancer was safe and effective. These therapies may offer long‐term survival to some patients. RT or CRT should be considered for LR.