Relationship between reflux diseases and obstructive sleep apnea together with continuous positive airway pressure treatment efficiency analysis

BackgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is known to be highly associated with reflux diseases. There is evidence that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) can decrease the clinical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in OSA patients, but whether CPAP can decrease nocturnal laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) episodes is still lack of strong evidence.ObjectiveTo investigate the efficiency of CPAP on LPR and the relationship between LPR, GER and OSA.Study designretrospective study.MethodsForty adult patients who had confirmed OSA by polysomnography and suspected LPR were enrolled. Their results of synchronous polysomnography and 24 h esophageal and oropharyngeal Dx-pH monitoring were analyzed. Twenty-seven OSA patients were treated with CPAP on the second night. The nocturnal reflux parameters with and without CPAP treatment were compared.Results15.0% and 42.5% of OSA patients were associated with LPR and GER through Dx-pH monitoring respectively. Nevertheless, more than one reflux attack falling below pH6.0 of oropharynx during sleep time was detected in 80.0% patients. There was a significant inverse correlation between the lowest/mean pH values of oropharynx and obstructive apnea index (OAI), so was the lowest pH values of esophagus. Significant positive correlation was calculated between the total number of reflux episodes below pH6.0 of oropharynx and apnea–hypopnea index (AHI)/OAI/hypopnea index (HI). A similar positive correlation was also significant between AHI/OAI and GER parameters. The assessment of the efficacy of CPAP treatment showed significant difference both in GER and LPR related parameter.ConclusionsOSA patients have a higher incidence of nocturnal LPR and GER. CPAP treatment can effectively reduce both GER and LPR attacks while disordered sleep events reduced in OSA patients.     

Association between respiratory events and nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux events in patients with coexisting obstructive sleep apnea and gastroesophageal reflux disease

BackgroundLiterature has addressed the increased prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Significant improvement of GERD has been found after OSA treatment. However, precise mechanisms underlying this correlation remain unclear. We examined the association between nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and sleep events in patients with coexisting OSA and GERD.MethodsA case-crossover study among 12 patients with coexisting moderate–severe OSA and GERD was conducted. Participants underwent simultaneous polysomnography and esophageal impedance and pH monitoring. GER subtypes (ie, acid reflux, non-acid reflux) were defined as outcomes. Respective control time points were selected in all eligible control periods. Each sleep event was assessed individually. Estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were analyzed. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.ResultsPatients were determined as moderate to severe OSA (respiratory disturbance index of 42.66 [±22.09]). There were a total of 50 GER episodes, 22 acid reflux and 28 non-acid reflux. Arousals and awakenings were significantly associated with subsequent GER events. The OR for GER following an arousal was 2.31 (95% CI 1.39–3.68; p < 0.001) and following an awakening was 3.71 (95% CI 1.81–7.63; p < 0.001). GER events were significantly less likely to occur after other respiratory events (OR 0.38 [95% CI 0.18–0.82]; p = 0.01). No sleep events followed GER events (p > 0.05).ConclusionsBoth awakening and arousal appear to precipitate any subtype of GER events in patients with coexisting GERD and moderate to severe OSA. However, GER events were significantly less likely to occur after other respiratory events and did not appear to cause sleep-related events.     

The lower esophageal sphincter

The lower esophageal sphincters (LES) together with the crural diaphragm are the major antireflux barriers protecting the esophagus from reflux of gastric content. However, reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus is a normal phenomenon in healthy individuals occurring primarily during episodes of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR), defined as LES relaxation in the absence of a swallow. Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation is also the dominant mechanism of pathologic reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD) patients. Frequency of TLESR does not differ significantly between healthy individuals and those with GERD, but TLESRs are more likely to be associated with acid reflux in GERD patients. Understanding the mechanisms responsible for elicitation of a TLESR, using recently introduced novel technology is an area of intense interest. Pharmacologic and non‐pharmacologic manipulation of receptors involved in the control of TLESR has recently emerged as a potential target for GERD therapy.     

Diagnosis of supra‐esophageal gastric reflux: correlation of oropharyngeal pH with esophageal impedance monitoring for gastro‐esophageal reflux

Background Oropharyngeal (OP) pH monitoring has been developed as a new way to diagnose supra‐esophageal gastric reflux (SEGR), but has not been well validated. Our aim was to determine the correlation between OP pH and gastro‐esophageal reflux (GER) events detected by multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH (MII‐pH). Methods Fifteen patients (11 males, median age 10.8 years) with suspected GER were prospectively evaluated with ambulatory 24‐h OP pH monitoring (positioned at the level of the uvula) and concomitant esophageal MII‐pH monitoring. Potential OP events were identified by the conventional pH threshold of <4 and by the following alternative criteria: (i) relative pH drop >10% from 15‐min baseline and (ii) absolute pH drop below thresholds of <5.5, 5.0, and 4.5. The 2‐min window preceding each OP event was analyzed for correlation with an episode of GER detected by MII‐pH. Key Results A total of 926 GER events were detected by MII‐pH. Application of alternative pH criteria increased the identification of potential OP pH events; however, a higher proportion of OP events had no temporal correlation with GER (45–81%), compared with the conventional definition of pH < 4 (40%). A total of 306 full‐column acid reflux episodes were detected by MII‐pH, of which 10 (3.3%) were also identified by OP pH monitoring. Conclusions & Inferences Use of extended pH criteria increased the detection of potential SEGR events, but the majority of decreases in OP pH were not temporally correlated with GER. Oropharyngeal pH monitoring without concurrent esophageal measurements may overestimate the presence of SEGR in children.     

The effect of baclofen on nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux and measures of sleep quality: a randomized, cross-over trial

Background Baclofen, a GABA_b agonist, has been shown to reduce episodes of gastroesophageal reflux (GER). To determine if baclofen would significantly reduce reflux during sleep, and also improve objective and subjective measures of sleep. Methods Twenty‐one individuals with complaints of nighttime heartburn at least twice a week and a Carlsson GERD score of at least 5 were studied. Patients underwent polysomnography (PSG) and simultaneous esophageal pH monitoring on two occasions separated by approximately 1 week in a cross‐over design. The night of each polysomnographic study, patients consumed a refluxogenic meal. Baclofen (40 mg) or placebo was given in random order 90 min prior to the start of the PSG. Key Results Baclofen significantly reduced the number of reflux events compared with placebo. Upright and recumbent acid contact times were both reduced by baclofen vs placebo, but the differences were not significant. Regarding sleep outcomes, several variables were significantly improved by baclofen. Total sleep time and sleep efficiency increased, and wake after sleep onset decreased in the baclofen condition compared with placebo. Proportion of Stage 1 sleep was also significantly decreased on baclofen. Conclusions & Inferences In addition to reducing the number of reflux events during sleep, baclofen significantly improved several measures of sleep in patients with documented GER and sleep disturbances. Baclofen could therefore be considered as a useful adjunct therapy to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with nighttime heartburn and sleep disturbance who continue to have heartburn and/or sleep complaints despite PPI therapy.     

The effects of intraduodenal nutrient infusion on serum CCK,LES pressure,and gastroesophageal reflux

Background Fats cause reflux symptoms in many patients and cholecystokinin (CCK) may play a role. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of intraduodenal nutrient infusion on serum CCK levels, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, and gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Methods Twenty‐four asymptomatic volunteers were studied. A Dent sleeve catheter assessed LES function while an impedance‐pH catheter measured reflux events. Participants were randomized to fat (F), carbohydrate (C) or protein (P) infusion. Serum CCK and LES pressures were measured at baseline and after nutrient infusion. Key Results Baseline LES pressures and CCK levels were similar in all three groups. A significant linear decrease was found in LES pressure during F, but not C or P, infusion (P = 0.004). A significant interaction effect was noted between the infusion groups and CCK levels (P = 0.002). A significant linear increase was noted in CCK levels during F but not during C or P infusion (P = 0.02). A significant inverse correlation was found between CCK levels and LES pressure (ρ = ?0.43; P = 0.04). Esophageal acid exposure was significantly increased in the F infusion group (median; interquartile range: 1.10%; 0.25–4.7%) compared to both the C (0.03%; 0.00–0.39%) and P infusion (0.03%; 0.00–0.39%) groups (P = 0.04). Conclusions & Inferences Intraduodenal F infusion was associated with an increase in CCK levels, while P and C were not. LES pressure decreased significantly after fat infusion and reflux events were more frequent. Fat‐induced CCK release is another mechanism that contributes to GER.     

Analysis of Spontaneous Gastroesophageal Reflux and Esophageal Acid Clearance in Patients with Reflux Esophagitis

To characterize gastroesophageal reflux episodes and esophageal acid clearance in patients with reflux esophagitis, we obtained 12-hour overnight esophageal pH and manometry recordings in 20 patients with macroscopic reflux esophagitis and in 15 healthy volunteers. Compared to the control subjects, the patients had less pressure in the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and higher rates of reflux, acid clearance time, and esophageal acid exposure. However, many patients had normal values for one or more of these variables. Transient LES relaxation accounted for 96% of reflux episodes in control subjects and 60% in patients. The remaining 40% of reflux episodes in patients occurred as stress or free reflux. In the control subjects, only one reflux episode occurred during estimated sleep. Of 22 reflux episodes during estimated sleep in patients, most were associated with low basal LES pressure. During esophageal acid clearance, the major esophageal motor event was swallow-induced peristalsis rather than secondary peristalsis. We conclude that esophagitis patients have lower LES pressures, more reflux episodes, impaired esophageal acid clearance, and more esophageal exposure to acid than control subjects. Individual patients, however, exhibit heterogeneous abnormalities with respect to these variables. Transient LES relaxation is the major mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in both patients and healthy subjects.     

Increase of weakly acidic gas esophagopharyngeal reflux (EPR) and swallowing‐induced acidic/weakly acidic EPR in patients with chronic cough responding to proton pump inhibitors

Background Gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD)‐related chronic cough (CC) may have multifactorial causes. To clarify the characteristics of esophagopharyngeal reflux (EPR) events in CC patients whose cough was apparently influenced by gastro‐esophageal reflux (GER), we studied patients with CC clearly responding to full‐dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy (CC patients). Methods Ten CC patients, 10 GERD patients, and 10 healthy controls underwent 24‐h ambulatory pharyngo‐esophageal impedance and pH monitoring. Weakly acidic reflux was defined as a decrease of pH by >1 unit with a nadir pH >4. In six CC patients, monitoring was repeated after 8 weeks of PPI therapy. The number of each EPR event and the symptom association probability (SAP) were calculated. Symptoms were evaluated by a validated GERD symptom questionnaire. Key Results Weakly acidic gas EPR and swallowing‐induced acidic/weakly acidic EPR only occurred in CC patients, and the numbers of such events was significantly higher in the CC group than in the other two groups (P < 0.05, respectively). Symptom association probability analysis revealed a positive association between GER and cough in three CC patients. Proton pump inhibitor therapy abolished swallowing‐induced acidic/weakly acidic EPR, reduced weakly acidic gas EPR, and improved symptoms (all P < 0.05). Conclusions & Inferences Most patients with CC responding to PPI therapy had weakly acidic gas EPR and swallowing‐induced acidic/weakly acidic EPR. A direct effect of acidic mist or liquid refluxing into the pharynx may contribute to chronic cough, while cough may also arise indirectly from reflux via a vago‐vagal reflex in some patients.     

Gastroesophageal and laryngopharyngeal reflux profiles in patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome as determined by combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring

Background The profiles of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) have never been explored. The aim of the study was to investigate the reflux profile in OSAHS patients. Methods Consecutive snoring out‐patients suspected with having OSAHS and 20 healthy volunteers were included. All subjects underwent simultaneous 24‐h combined multichannel intraluminal impedance–pH (MII–pH) monitoring and polysomnography. Obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome was defined when the apnea/hypopnea index was over 5. Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the predictor for OSAHS. Key Results Fifty‐three patients were included, 37 with and 16 without OSAHS. The prevalence of reflux symptoms was similar between OSAHS (35.1%) and non‐OSHAS (37.5%) patients. More OSAHS patients, compared with non‐OSAHS patients and healthy volunteers, had pathologic acid GER, nocturnal acid GER, and prolonged acid clearance (P < 0.001). However, no difference in non‐acid reflux episodes was observed among the three groups. Laryngopharyngeal reflux was detected in 51.4%, 43.8%, and 35.0% of OSAHS, non‐OSAHS, and healthy volunteers, respectively (P = 0.034). In OSAHS patients, there was no difference in the sleep parameters between patients with and without LPR. Body mass index was the only predictor of OSAHS in the regression analysis. Conclusions & Inferences OSAHS patients have more pathologic acid GER and prolonged acid clearance than non‐OSAHS patients whereas non‐acid reflux was similar between the two groups. However, BMI, not GER, is the only independent predictor for OSAHS. Laryngopharyngeal reflux occurs in more than half of OSAHS patients despite no significant association with OSAHS.     

Objective definition and detection of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation revisited: is there room for improvement?

Background The advent of drugs that inhibit transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR) necessitates accurate identification and scoring. We assessed the intra‐ and inter‐assessor variability of the existing objective criteria for TLESR, improving them where necessary. Methods Two 3‐h postprandial esophageal manometric and pH recordings were performed in 20 healthy volunteers. Each recording was duplicated. The recordings were analyzed by five experienced observers for TLESRs based on their expert opinion. TLESRs were also analyzed for the presence of the original four criteria as well as inhibition of the crural diaphragm (ID), a prominent after‐contraction (AC), acid reflux and an esophageal common cavity. Key Results The overall inter‐ and intra‐observer agreements for TLESRs scored, according to observer’s expert opinion, were 59% (range 56–67%) and 74% (60–89%), respectively. When TLESRs were restricted to those fulfilling the original criteria, these agreements fell to 46% (40–53%) and 60% (44–67%), respectively. Cleaning the recordings by removal of technically flawed sections improved agreements by 5%. Inclusion of additional criteria (ID and AC) resulted in inter‐ and intra‐observer agreements of 62% (52–70%) and 69% (53–79%), respectively. A consensus analysis performed collectively by three observers and based on the new criteria (original ± ID and AC) resulted in 84% agreement between the paired recordings. Conclusions & Inferences The original criteria for the definition of TLESRs allows for substantial inter‐ and intra‐observer variability, which can be reduced by incorporation of additional objective criteria. However, the highest level of intra‐observer agreement can be achieved by consensus analysis.     

Cardiovascular compression of the esophagus and spread of gastro‐esophageal reflux

Background Factors that determine the spread of gastro‐esophageal reflux (GER) along the length of the esophagus are not known. We investigated if cardiovascular (CV) compressions on the esophagus may determine the spread of refluxate into the proximal esophagus. Methods High‐resolution manometry (HRM) and multi‐channel intra‐luminal impedance recording (MIIR) were performed simultaneously in 10 normal subjects in the recumbent and upright positions. Pulsatile pressure increases on the esophagus (marker of CV compression) were identified on the HRM. Spread of refluxate into the esophagus was determined by the MIIR. Key Results Cardiovascular compression zones were observed in the esophagus in 9 out of 10 subjects in recumbent position. Forty percent of GER episodes were limited to the distal esophagus in the recumbent position and CV compression pressure was greater than distal esophageal pressure at the time of GER in all such cases. On the other hand, distal esophageal pressure was greater than CV compression pressure when the refluxate extended into the proximal esophagus. In the upright position, CV compression was less frequent than recumbent position and only 12% of GER episodes were limited to the distal esophagus. Conclusions & Inferences Cardiovascular compression of the esophagus is frequently observed in normal healthy subject and restricts the spread of refluxate into the proximal esophagus.     

Reflux monitoring in children

Recently, multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) monitoring was added to the repertoire of tests to evaluate the (patho)physiology of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in children. Its advantage above the sole monitoring of the esophageal pH lies in the ability of the detection of both acid and nonacid GER and to discern between liquid and gas GER. Currently, combined 24 h pH‐MII monitoring is recommended for evaluation of gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its relation to symptoms in infants and children, despite the lack of reference values in these age groups. There is new evidence in the current issue of this Journal supporting the role of pH‐MII monitoring for the evaluation of children presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms suggestive of GERD and the prediction of the presence of reflux esophagitis. However, several issues should be taken into account when performing pH‐MII clinically.     

High‐resolution esophageal pressure topography is superior to conventional sleeve manometry for the detection of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations associated with a reflux event

Background Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are the main mechanism underlying gastro‐esophageal reflux and are detected during manometric studies using well defined criteria. Recently, high‐resolution esophageal pressure topography (HREPT) has been introduced and is now considered as the new standard to study esophageal and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function. In this study we performed a head‐to‐head comparison between HREPT and conventional sleeve manometry for the detection of TLESRs. Methods A setup with two synchronized MMS‐solar systems was used. A solid state HREPT catheter, a water‐perfused sleeve catheter, and a multi intraluminal impedance pH (MII‐pH) catheter were introduced in 10 healthy volunteers (M6F4, age 19–56). Subjects were studied 0.5 h before and 3 h after ingestion of a standardized meal. Tracings were blinded and analyzed by the three authors according to the TLESR criteria. Key Results In the HREPT mode 156 TLESRs were scored, vs 143 during sleeve manometry (P = 0.10). Hundred and twenty‐three TLESRs were scored by both techniques. Of all TLESRs (177), 138 were associated with reflux (78%). High‐resolution esophageal pressure topography detected significantly more TLESRs associated with a reflux event (132 vs 119, P = 0.015) resulting in a sensitivity for detection of TLESRs with reflux of 96% compared to 86% respectively. Analysis of the discordant TLESRs associated with reflux showed that TLESRs were missed by sleeve manometry due to low basal LES pressure (N = 5), unstable pharyngeal signal (N = 4), and residual sleeve pressure >2 mmHg (N = 10). Conclusions & Inferences The HREPT is superior to sleeve manometry for the detection of TLESRs associated with reflux. However, rigid HREPT criteria are awaited.     

Effect of low‐proof alcoholic beverages on duodenogastro‐esophageal reflux in health and GERD

Background Alcoholic beverages are known to increase acidic gastro‐esophageal reflux (GER) and the risk of esophagitis. Moreover, duodenogastro‐esophageal reflux (DGER), containing bile acids, was shown to harmfully alter the esophageal mucosa, alone and synergistically with HCl and pepsin. However, studies directly addressing potential effects of different low proof alcoholic beverages on DGER in health and disease are missing. Methods Bilitec readings for beer and white, rose, and red wine were obtained in vitro from pure and from mixtures with bile. One‐hour DGER monitoring and pH‐metry were performed in 12 healthy subjects and nine reflux patients with DGER after ingestion of a standardized liquid meal together with 300 mL of water, white wine, and in the volunteers, beer and rose wine. Key Results Bilitec measurement was found to be feasible in the presence of beer, white wine, and using a threshold of 0.25, rose wine. However, the presence of red wine resulted in extinction values above this threshold. The consumption of all investigated alcoholic beverages, especially of white wine, triggered increased acidic GER, both in healthy participants and patients with reflux disease. In contrast, no relevant DGER was found after intake of alcoholic beverages. Conclusions & Inferences Fiber‐optic bilirubin monitoring can be used for DGER monitoring in combination with alcoholic beverages, except with red wine. Low‐proof alcoholic beverages are a strong trigger of GER, but not of DGER, both in healthy subjects and patients with reflux disease.     

Effect of proximal gastric volume on hiatal hernia

Background Spatial separation of the diaphragm and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) occurs frequently and intermittently in patients with a sliding hiatus hernia and favors gastro‐esophageal reflux. This can be studied with high‐resolution manometry. Although fundic accommodation is associated with a lower basal LES pressure, its effect on esophagogastric junction configuration and hiatal hernia is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between proximal gastric volume, the presence of a hiatal hernia profile and acid reflux. Methods Twenty gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients were studied and compared to 20 healthy controls. High‐resolution manometry and pH recording were performed for 1 h before and 2 h following meal ingestion (500 mL per 300 kcal). Volume of the proximal stomach was assessed with three‐dimensional ultrasonography before and every 15 min after meal ingestion. Key Results During fasting, the hernia profile [2 separate high‐pressure zones (HPZs) at manometry] was present for 31.9 ± 4.9 min h^?1 (53.2%) in GERD patients, and 8.7 ± 3.3 min h^?1 (14.5%) in controls (P < 0.001). In GERD patients, the presence of hernia profile decreased during the first postprandial hour to 15.9 ± 4.2 min h^?1, 26.5%, P < 0.01 whilst this phenomenon was not observed in controls. The rate of transition between the two profiles was 5.7 ± 1.1 per hour in GERD patients and 2.5 ± 1.0 per hour in controls (P < 0.001). The pre and postprandial acid reflux rate in GERD patients during the hernia profile (6.4 ± 1.1 per hour and 18.4 ± 4.3 per hour respectively) was significantly higher than during reduced hernia (2.1 ± 0.6 per hour; P < 0.05 and 3.8 ± 0.9 per hour; P < 0.05). A similar difference was found in controls. Furthermore, an inverse correlation was found between fundic volume and the time the hernia profile was present (r = ?0.45; P < 0.05) in GERD patients, but not in controls. Conclusions & Inferences (i) In GERD patients a postprandial increase in proximal gastric volume is accompanied by a decrease in hernia prevalence, which can be explained by a reduction of the intra‐thoracic part of the stomach. (ii) A temporal hernia profile also occurs in healthy subjects. (iii) During the hernia profile, acid reflux is more prevalent, especially after meal ingestion.     

Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in children with sequelae of birth asphyxia

Patterns of childhood gastroesophageal reflux (GER) have been studied extensively; however, the mechanisms underlying its occurrence in neurologically impaired children (NIC) are poorly understood. Concurrent esophageal manometry and pH monitoring was conducted in 10 un-operated children (7 male; mean age: 59.5 months) with sequelae birth asphyxia and esophagitis. Reflux episodes were scored when esophageal pH decreased to <4 for at least 5s. When the rate of decrease of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure was >1mmHg/s, the decrease of LES pressure was defined as LES relaxation. The time relationship of the pharyngeal manometric swallowing signal to LES relaxation onset was then evaluated in order to distinguish between LES relaxations associated with swallowing (type II or III, associated with one or more swallows, respectively) and those that occurred independently of swallowing (type I). Results: Esophageal manometry and pH monitoring were conducted for a mean duration of 91.5min. Basal LES pressure averaged (+/-SD) 9.2+/-4.8mmHg; in 4 of 10 patients (40%) the LES pressure was largely undetectable, varying between 0 and 2mmHg. Mean LES pressure was inversely correlated with age (r=0.7, P=0.02). The total number of reflux episodes/h averaged 32.1+/-12.1 LES pressure reached 0mmHg in 98% of reflux episodes. Type I LES relaxations were present in 3.15+/-1.1 reflux episodes/h, whereas type II LES relaxation occurred in 2.3+/-2.4 episodes/h. Acid reflux episodes appeared during absent basal LES tone periods, without phasic LES relaxations, in 74%. Conclusions: Absent basal LES tone is the main mechanism of GER in a subgroup of NIC, especially in older children. Transient LES relaxation, the most common known event associated with acid reflux in neurologically normal children, seems to precede a minority of reflux events in NIC.     

Arousals in obstructive sleep apnea patients with laryngopharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux

Objective: We hypothesized that differences exist in the effect of apnea severity and those of laryngopharyngeal reflex (LPR) versus gastroesophageal reflex (GER) on arousals during sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS).Methods: Japanese patients having witnessed snoring or excessive daytime sleepiness with a frequency scale for symptoms of GER of 10 or more or with visualization of inflammatory changes on pharyngolaryngeal endoscopy underwent polysomnography with pH monitoring using double pH catheter in a sleep laboratory.Results: Most reflux events in patients with severe OSAS with LPR (n = 16) and GER (n = 21) were accompanied with respiratory arousals. On the other hand, among patients with mild-to-moderate OSAS, 64.0% and 24.8% of reflux events were accompanied with spontaneous arousals in those with LPR (n = 12) and GER (n = 12), respectively, and 9.4% and 8.3% of reflux events were not accompanied by arousals. There were no significant differences in other sleep parameters between mild-to-moderate OSAS patients with LPR versus GER and between severe OSAS patients with LPR versus GER.Conclusions: Among patients with reflux, the types of arousal differed significantly between those with mild-to-moderate versus severe OSAS. In patients with mild-to-moderate OSAS, LPR induces more spontaneous arousals than does GER.     

Analysis of Spontaneous Gastroesophageal Reflux and Esophageal Acid Clearance in Patients with Reflux Esophagitis

To characterize gastroesophageal reflux episodes and esophageal acid clearance in patients with reflux esophagitis, we obtained 12-hour overnight esophageal pH and manometry recordings in 20 patients with macroscopic reflux esophagitis and in 15 healthy volunteers. Compared to the control subjects, the patients had less pressure in the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and higher rates of reflux, acid clearance time, and esophageal acid exposure. However, many patients had normal values for one or more of these variables. Transient LES relaxation accounted for 96% of reflux episodes in control subjects and 60% in patients. The remaining 40% of reflux episodes in patients occurred as stress or free reflux. In the control subjects, only one reflux episode occurred during estimated sleep. Of 22 reflux episodes during estimated sleep in patients, most were associated with low basal LES pressure. During esophageal acid clearance, the major esophageal motor event was swallow-induced peristalsis rather than secondary peristalsis. We conclude that esophagitis patients have lower LES pressures, more reflux episodes, impaired esophageal acid clearance, and more esophageal exposure to acid than control subjects. Individual patients, however, exhibit heterogeneous abnormalities with respect to these variables. Transient LES relaxation is the major mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in both patients and healthy subjects.     

Failure to respond to physiologic challenge characterizes esophageal motility in erosive gastro‐esophageal reflux disease

Background Non‐specific esophageal dysmotility with impaired clearance is often present in patients with gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD), especially those with erosive disease; however the physio‐mechanic basis of esophageal dysfunction is not well defined. Methods Retrospective assessment of patients with erosive reflux disease (ERD; n = 20) and endoscopy negative reflux disease (ENRD; n = 20) with pathologic acid exposure on pH studies (>4.2% time/24 h) and also healthy controls (n = 20) studied by high resolution manometry. Esophageal motility in response to liquid and solid bolus swallows and multiple water swallows (MWS) was analyzed. Peristaltic dysfunction was defined as failed peristalsis, spasm, weak or poorly coordinated esophageal contraction (>3 cm break in 30 mmHg isocontour). Key Results Peristaltic dysfunction was present in 33% of water swallows in controls, 56% ENRD and 76% ERD respectively (P < 0.023 vs controls, P = 0.185 vs ENRD). The proportion of effective peristaltic contractions improved with solid compared to liquid bolus in controls (18%vs 33%, P = 0.082) and ENRD (22%vs 54%, P = 0.046) but not ERD (62%vs 76%, P = 0.438). Similarly, MWS was followed by effective peristalsis in 83% of controls and 70% ENRD but only 30% ERD patients (P < 0.017 vs controls and P < 0.031 vs ENRD). The association between acid exposure and dysmotility was closer for solid than liquid swallows (r = 0.52 vs 0.27). Conclusions & Inferences Peristaltic dysfunction is common in GERD. ERD patients are characterized by a failure to respond to the physiologic challenge of solid bolus and MWS that is likely also to impair clearance following reflux events and increase exposure to gastric refluxate.     

Serum lipid levels are positively associated with non‐erosive reflux disease,but not with functional heartburn

Background Metabolic syndrome and obesity are known risk factors for gastro‐esophageal reflux disease (GERD), especially for erosive esophagitis. Although non‐erosive reflux disease (NERD) is probably associated with obesity or other metabolic syndrome, there is little direct evidence to support this assertion. Methods Workers in Keio University who underwent a general health examination between September 2006 and August 2007 were enrolled. Reflux symptom questionnaires were administered and metabolic parameters were obtained. The severity of gastro‐esophageal reflux (GER) was scored using a validated scale of videoesophagography. Key Results Two hundred and eighty‐three subjects (243 men and 40 women; mean age 49.8 ± 6.9 years) with no radiographic evidence of erosive esophagitis were enrolled. The severity of GER was worse among men than among women, whereas the severity of reflux symptoms was worse among women. The severity of GER was associated with age and serum triglyceride levels in men, and with the serum low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in women. The severity of reflux symptoms, however, was not associated with metabolic parameters. There were more women than men with reflux symptoms but without GER (‘presumed’ functional heartburn group), compared with subjects with neither GER nor reflux symptoms. In men, the presence of both reflux symptoms and GER (‘presumed’ NERD group) was associated with the serum triglyceride levels. Conclusions & Inferences While NERD is associated with serum lipid levels, functional heartburn is not. The prevalence of GER was greater among men; conversely, the prevalence of functional heartburn was greater among women.