Combination of antibodies inhibits accelerated rejection mediated by memory T cells in xenoantigen-primed mice

Wang F, Xia J, Chen J, Peng Y, Cheng P, Ekberg H, Wang X, Qi Z. Combination of antibodies inhibits accelerated rejection mediated by memory T cells in xenoantigen‐primed mice. Xenotransplantation 2010; 17: 460–468. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Donor‐reactive memory T cells are known to accelerate allograft rejection; in our previous study, we reported that combined monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) could prolong islet allograft survival in alloantigen‐primed mice. In this study, we examine the effects of donor‐reactive memory T cells on the xenograft survival and methods to prolong the islet graft survival. Methods: To collect donor‐reactive T cells, we performed full‐thickness rat skin xenografting on BALB/c mice and isolated the T cells from the mice after 6–8 weeks. These cells were then adoptively transferred to syngenic mice 1 day before rat‐to‐mouse islet transplantation. Three experimental groups were established in the adoptive transfer model: recipient mice treated with isotype mAbs (isotype group); mice treated with anti‐CD40L mAb (anti‐CD40L group); and mice treated with anti‐CD40L, anti‐OX40L, and anti‐CD122 mAbs (3‐combined group). Results: Lewis rat islet xenografts transplanted in naïve mice showed a mean survival time (MST) of 12.8 days, while the graft rejection was accelerated if the recipient mice were treated with adoptively transferred donor‐reactive T cells (MST, 8.67 days). Treatment with anti‐CD40L mb could not reverse the accelerated rejection (MST, 9.3 days). However, when anti‐CD40L mb was combined with anti‐OX40L and anti‐CD122 mAbs, there was a considerable increase in the MST, which was 72.2 days. Compared to the isotype group, the 3‐combined group had significantly lesser proportion of memory T cells and greater proportion of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the spleen. Meanwhile, in the 3‐combined group, the production of anti‐rat antibodies was markedly inhibited. Conclusion: Treatment with a combination of antibodies could significantly reverse the accelerated rejection mediated by donor‐reactive memory T cells by inhibiting cellular and humoral immune responses.     

Xenoreactive CD4+ memory T cells resist inhibition by anti-CD44 mAb and reject islet grafts via a Th2-dependent pathway

Peng YZ, Chen JB, Shao W, Wang FY, Dai HL, Cheng PP, Xia JJ, Wang F, Huang R, Zhu Q, Qi Z. Xenoreactive CD4⁺ memory T cells resist inhibition by anti‐CD44 mAb and reject islet grafts via a Th2‐dependent pathway. Xenotransplantation 2011; 18: 252–261. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Memory T cells are a significant barrier to the induction of transplant tolerance. Our previous study demonstrated that multiple applications of anti‐CD44 monoclonal antibody (mAb) could significantly inhibit CD4⁺ memory T cells from mediating rejection of cardiac allografts. Now, we sought to explore the effect and mechanism of anti‐CD44 mAb on the rejection of islet allografts and xenografts mediated by CD4⁺ memory T cells. Methods: In this study, we first engrafted skin grafts of C57BL/6 (B6) mice or Dark Agouti (DA) rats onto BALB/c mice to induce donor‐reactive memory T cells. We adoptively transferred purified CD4⁺ memory T cells to BALB/c origin nude mice and then transplanted islet allografts and xenografts to produce the Allo‐Tx and Xeno‐Tx models, respectively. We subsequently administered multiple anti‐CD44 mAb and observed changes in the survival times of the islet grafts. Results: In the Allo‐Tx model, the mean survival time (MST) of the grafts was 7.7 days in the isotype group, and 20.3 days in the anti‐CD44 group. In the Xeno‐Tx model, the MST of the grafts was 7.2 days in the isotype group and 8.2 days in the anti‐CD44 group. Compared with the isotype group, CD4⁺ T cells on the grafts in the anti‐CD44 group were significantly decreased in both the Allo‐Tx and Xeno‐Tx models, but the proportion of CD4⁺ memory T cells in the spleens and draining lymph nodes of the recipient nude mice in the anti‐CD44 group was significantly decreased in the Allo‐Tx model, while it was increased in the Xeno‐Tx model. The production of donor‐specific IgG antibody in the anti‐CD44 group did not vary in the Allo‐Tx model, while it was markedly elevated in the Xeno‐Tx model. Furthermore, the expression of interferon gamma in the anti‐CD44 group was markedly decreased in both the Allo‐Tx and Xeno‐Tx models, while the expression of IL‐4 in the anti‐CD44 group was significantly increased only in the Xeno‐Tx model. Conclusion: Multiple applications of the anti‐CD44 mAb could significantly inhibit donor‐reactive CD4⁺ memory T cells from rejecting grafts via a Th1‐dependent pathway, but xenoreactive CD4⁺ memory T cells can avoid the effects of anti‐CD44 mAb to reject islet xenografts via a Th2‐dependent pathway.     

Costimulatory blockade induces hyporesponsiveness in T cells that recognize alloantigen via indirect antigen presentation

BACKGROUND: Blockade of T cell costimulation by treatment with donor-specific transfusion (DST) and anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb) induces prolonged allograft survival in mice. This effect is due in part to deletion of host CD8 and CD4 T cells that recognize alloantigen by direct presentation. The fate of host CD4 T cells that recognize alloantigen by indirect presentation, however, is unclear. METHODS: We studied Tg361 TCR transgenic CD4 T cells that recognize alloantigen by indirect presentation. Carboxyfluorescein diacetate, succinimidyl ester-labeled Tg361 cells were adoptively transferred into syngeneic nontransgenic recipients and their fate in the peripheral blood, spleen, and lymph nodes following treatment with DST and anti-CD154 was analyzed. RESULTS: Treatment of mice with DST plus anti-CD154 mAb does not delete Tg361 CD4 T cells, but instead renders them hyporesponsive to rechallenge with alloantigen. Mice circulating hyporesponsive CD4 T cells also fail to reject skin allografts. The hyporesponsive state of the T cells is not reversed by the addition of interleukin-2, anti-CD28 mAb, or an agonistic anti-CD134 mAb in the presence of antigen. These T cells are capable of activation, however, as evidenced by in vitro proliferation in response to anti-CD3 mAb. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that costimulation blockade can induce hyporesponsiveness of host CD4 T cells recognizing alloantigens by indirect presentation, thus prolonging graft survival by a mechanism that does not involve deletion of alloreactive T cells.     

LFA‐1 Antagonism Inhibits Early Infiltration of Endogenous Memory CD8 T Cells into Cardiac Allografts and Donor‐Reactive T Cell Priming

Alloreactive memory T cells are present in virtually all transplant recipients due to prior sensitization or heterologous immunity and mediate injury undermining graft outcome. In mouse models, endogenous memory CD8 T cells infiltrate MHC‐mismatched cardiac allografts and produce IFN‐γ in response to donor class I MHC within 24 h posttransplant. The current studies analyzed the efficacy of anti‐LFA‐1 mAb to inhibit early CD8 T cell cardiac allograft infiltration and activation. Anti‐LFA‐1 mAb given to C57BL/6 6 (H‐2^b) recipients of A/J (H‐2^a) heart grafts on days –1 and 0 completely inhibited CD8 T cell allograft infiltration, markedly decreased neutrophil infiltration and significantly reduced intragraft expression levels of IFN‐γ‐induced genes. Donor‐specific T cells producing IFN‐γ were at low/undetectable numbers in spleens of anti‐LFA‐1 mAb treated recipients until day 21. These effects combined to promote substantial prolongation (from day 8 to 27) in allograft survival. Delaying anti‐LFA‐1 mAb treatment until days 3 and 4 posttransplant did not inhibit early memory CD8 T cell infiltration and proliferation within the allograft. These data indicate that peritransplant anti‐LFA‐1 mAb inhibits early donor‐reactive memory CD8 T cell allograft infiltration and inflammation suggesting an effective strategy to attenuate the negative effects of heterologous immunity in transplant recipients.     

In Vivo Development of Transplant Arteriosclerosis in Humanized Mice Reflects Alloantigen Recognition and Peripheral Treg Phenotype of Lung Transplant Recipients

Experimentally, regulatory T cells inhibit rejection. In clinical transplantations, however, it is not known whether T cell regulation is the cause for, or an epiphenomenon of, long‐term allograft survival. Here, we study naïve and alloantigen‐primed T cell responses of clinical lung transplant recipients in humanized mice. The pericardiophrenic artery procured from human lung grafts was implanted into the aorta of NODrag^?/?/IL‐2rγc^?/? mice reconstituted with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from the respective lung recipient. Naïve or primed allogeneic PBMCs procured 21 days post–lung transplantation with or without enriching for CD4⁺CD25^high T cells were used. Transplant arteriosclerosis was assessed 28 days later by histology. Mice reconstituted with alloantigen‐primed PBMCs showed significantly more severe transplant arteriosclerosis than did mice with naïve PBMCs (p = 0.005). Transplant arteriosclerosis was equally suppressed by enriching for autologous naïve (p = 0.012) or alloantigen‐primed regulatory T cells (Tregs) (p = 0.009). Alloantigen priming in clinical lung recipients can be adoptively transferred into a humanized mouse model. Transplant arteriosclerosis elicited by naïve or alloantigen‐primed PBMCs can be similarly controlled by potent autologous Tregs. Cellular therapy with expanded autologous Tregs in lung transplantation might be a promising future strategy.     

CD2 is a Dominant Target for Allogeneic Responses

CD2 and 2B4 (CD244) are members of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily and are both ligands for another family member, CD48. CD2 is widely distributed on T, NK, and B cells and some antigen-presenting cells, while 2B4 is expressed on NK and some T cells and monocytes and is known to participate in NK cytotoxicity. Since indefinite allograft survival could be obtained by a combination of anti-CD48 plus anti-CD2 mAb administration, it was important to determine the role of 2B4 blockade in allograft rejection. MAbs directed against CD2, CD48, or 2B4 were administered singly or in pairs to cardiac allograft recipients. The experiments show that only anti-CD2 plus anti-CD48 mAbs result in indefinite allograft survival, while anti-CD2 plus anti-2B4 mAbs substantially prolong graft survival, and anti-CD48 plus anti-2B4 mAbs were no better than each mAb alone. The effect of these mAbs on anti-CD3 mAb and alloantigen-driven proliferation and IFN-gamma production were also assessed. In general, anti-CD2 inhibited both anti-CD3 mAb and alloantigen-driven responses, while anti-CD48 inhibited only anti-CD3 mAb but not alloantigen-driven proliferative and cytokine responses. Anti-2B4 mAbs were generally ineffective alone. Combinations of mAbs were more effective than single mAbs only in alloantigen-driven proliferation, commensurate with allograft survival results. Using CD2-/- and CD48-/- T cells and antigen-presenting cells, we also demonstrate that these inhibitory mAbs act primarily by blocking intercellular interactions, rather than directly delivering negative signals to T cells. These results suggest that, unlike CD2, 2B4 is not a potent regulatory molecule or ligand for CD48 in the response to alloantigen. Blocking the 2B4-CD48 receptor-ligand pair does not inhibit T-cell responses and alloreactivity to the same degree as CD2-CD48 blockade.     

CD8+ T‐Cell Depletion and Rapamycin Synergize with Combined Coreceptor/Stimulation Blockade to Induce Robust Limb Allograft Tolerance in Mice

The growing development of composite tissue allografts (CTA) highlights the need for tolerance induction protocols. Herein, we developed a mouse model of heterotopic limb allograft in a stringent strain combination in which potentially tolerogenic strategies were tested taking advantage of donor stem cells in the grafted limb. BALB/c allografts were transplanted into C57BL/6 mice treated with anti‐CD154 mAb, nondepleting anti‐CD4 combined to either depleting or nondepleting anti‐CD8 mAbs. Some groups received additional rapamycin. Both depleting and nondepleting mAb combinations without rapamycin only delayed limb allograft rejection, whereas the addition of rapamycin induced long‐term allograft survival in both combinations. Nevertheless, robust donor‐specific tolerance, defined by the acceptance of a fresh donor‐type skin allograft and simultaneous rejection of third‐party grafts, required initial CD8⁺ T‐cell depletion. Mixed donor‐recipient chimerism was observed in lymphoid organs and recipient bone marrow of tolerant but not rejecting animals. Tolerance specificity was confirmed by the inability to produce IL‐2, IFN‐γ and TNF‐α in MLC with donor antigen while significant alloreactivity persisted against third‐ party alloantigens. Collectively, these results show that robust CTA tolerance and mixed donor‐recipient chimerism can be achieved in response to the synergizing combination of rapamycin, transient CD8⁺ T‐cell depletion and costimulation/coreceptor blockade.     

Regulatory T Cells Are Critical to Tolerance Induction in Presensitized Mouse Transplant Recipients Through Targeting Memory T Cells

Memory T cells are a significant barrier to induction of transplant tolerance. However, reliable means to target alloreactive memory T cells have remained elusive. In this study, presensitization of BALB/c mice with C57BL/6 skin grafts generated a large number of OX40⁺CD44^hieffector/memory T cells and resulted in rapid rejection of donor heart allografts. Recognizing that anti‐OX40L monoclonal antibody (mAb) (α‐OX40L) monotherapy prolonged graft survival through inhibition and apoptosis of memory T cells in presensitized recipients, α‐OX40L was added to the combined treatment protocol of LF15–0195 (LF) and anti‐CD45RB (α‐CD45RB) mAb—a protocol that induced heart allograft tolerance in non‐presensitized recipients but failed to induce tolerance in presensitized recipients. Interestingly, this triple therapy restored donor‐specific heart allograft tolerance in our presensitized model that was associated with induction of tolerogenic dendritic cells and CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ T regulatory cells (Tregs). Of note, CD25⁺ T cell depletion in triple therapy recipients prevented establishment of allograft tolerance. In addition, adoptive transfer of donor‐primed effector/memory T cells into tolerant recipients markedly reduced levels of Tregs and broke tolerance. Our findings indicated that targeting memory T cells, by blocking OX40 costimulation in presensitized recipients was very important to expansion of Tregs, which proved critical to development of tolerance.     

Transplant Acceptance Following Anti‐CD4 Versus Anti‐CD40L Therapy: Evidence for Differential Maintenance of Graft‐Reactive T Cells

Inductive therapy with anti‐CD4 or anti‐CD40L monoclonal antibodies (mAb) leads to long‐term allograft acceptance but the immune parameters responsible for graft maintenance are not well understood. This study employed an adoptive transfer system in which cells from mice bearing long‐term cardiac allografts following inductive anti‐CD4 or anti‐CD40L therapy were transferred into severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) allograft recipients. SCID recipients of cells from anti‐CD4‐treated mice (anti‐CD4 cells) did not reject allografts while those receiving cells from anti‐CD40L‐treated mice (anti‐CD40L cells) did reject allografts. Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) labeling of transferred cells revealed that this difference was not associated with differential proliferative capacities of these cells in SCID recipients. Like cells from naïve mice, anti‐CD40L cells mounted a Th1 response following transfer while anti‐CD4 cells mounted a dominant Th2 response. Early (day 10) T‐cell priming was detectable in both groups of primary allograft recipients but persisted to day 30 only in recipients treated with anti‐CD4 mAb. Thus, anti‐CD40L therapy appears to result in graft‐reactive T cells with a naïve phenotype while anti‐CD4 therapy allows progression to an altered state of differentiation. Additional data herein support the notion that anti‐CD40L mAb targets activated, but not memory, cells for removal or functional silencing.     

Differential Requirement of CD27 Costimulatory Signaling for Naïve Versus Alloantigen‐Primed Effector/Memory CD8+ T Cells

CD8⁺ memory T cells endanger allograft survival by causing acute and chronic rejection and prevent tolerance induction. We explored the role of CD27:CD70 T‐cell costimulatory pathway in alloreactive CD8⁺/CD4⁺ T‐cell activation. CD27‐deficient (CD27^?/?) and wild‐type (WT) B6 mice rejected BALB/c cardiac allografts at similar tempo, with or without depletion of CD4⁺ or CD8⁺ T cells, suggesting that CD27 is not essential during primary T‐cell alloimmune responses. To dissect the role of CD27 in primed effector and memory alloreactive T cells, CD27^?/? or WT mice were challenged with BALB/c hearts either 10 or 40 days after sensitization with donor‐type skin grafts. Compared to WT controls, allograft survival was prolonged in day 40‐ but not day 10‐sensitized CD27^?/? recipients. Improved allograft survival was accompanied by diminished secondary responsiveness of memory CD8⁺ T cells, which resulted from deficiency in memory formation rather than their lack of secondary expansion. Chronic allograft vasculopathy and fibrosis were diminished in CD27^?/? recipients of class I‐ but not class II‐mismatched hearts as compared to WT controls. These data establish a novel role for CD27 as an important costimulatory molecule for alloreactive CD8⁺ memory T cells in acute and chronic allograft rejection.     

The Immunobiology of Inductive Anti-CD40L Therapy in Transplantation: Allograft Acceptance is Not Dependent Upon the Deletion of Graft-Reactive T Cells

CD40–CD40L costimulatory interactions are crucial for allograft rejection, in that treatment with anti‐CD40L mAb markedly prolongs allograft survival in several systems. Recent reports indicate that costimulatory blockade results in deletion of graft‐reactive cells, which leads to allograft tolerance. To assess immunologic parameters that were influenced by inductive CD40–CD40L blockade, cardiac allograft recipients were treated with multiple doses of the anti‐CD40L mAb MR1, which was remarkably effective at prolonging allograft survival. Acute allograft rejection responses such as IL‐2 producing helper cell priming, Th1 priming, and alloantibody production were abrogated by anti‐CD40L treatment. Interestingly, the spleens of mice bearing long‐term cardiac allografts following inductive anti‐CD40L treatment retained precursor donor alloantigen‐reactive CTL, IL‐2 producing helper cells, and Th1 in numbers comparable to those observed in naïve mice. These mice retained the ability to reject donor‐strain skin allografts, but were incapable of rejecting the original cardiac allograft, or a second donor‐strain cardiac allograft. Further, differentiated effector cells were incapable of mediating rejection following adoptive transfer into mice bearing long‐term allografts, suggesting that regulatory cell function, rather than effector cell deletion was responsible for long‐term graft acceptance. Collectively, these data demonstrate that inductive CD40–CD40L blockade does not result in the deletion of graft‐reactive T cells, but induces the maintenance of these cells in a quiescent precursor state. They further point to a tissue specificity of this hyporesponsiveness, suggesting that not all donor alloantigen‐reactive cells are subject to this regulation.     

Flt3L‐mobilized dendritic cells bearing H2‐Kbm1 apoptotic cells do not induce cross‐tolerance to CD8+ T cells across a class I MHC mismatched barrier

Tolerization of allogeneic CD8⁺ T cells is still a pending issue in the field of transplantation research to achieve long‐term survival. To test whether dendritic cells (DC) bearing allogeneic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I mismatched apoptotic cells could induce cross‐tolerance to alloreactive CD8⁺ T cells, the following experimental strategy was devised. Rag2/γ_c KO B6 mice were treated with Fms‐like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (Flt3L)‐transduced B16 melanoma cells to drive a rapid expansion and mobilization of DC in vivo. Of all DC populations expanded, splenic CD11c⁺CD103⁺CD8α⁺ DC were selectively involved in the process of antigen clearance of X‐ray irradiated apoptotic thymocytes in vivo. Considering that CD11c⁺CD103⁺CD8α⁺ DC selectively take up apoptotic cells and that they are highly specialized in cross‐presenting antigen to CD8⁺ T cells, we investigated whether B6 mice adoptively transferred with Flt3L‐derived DC loaded with donor‐derived apoptotic thymocytes could induce tolerance to bm1 skin allografts. Our findings on host anti‐donor alloresponse, as revealed by skin allograft survival and cytotoxic T lymphocyte assays, indicated that the administration of syngeneic DC presenting K^bm1 donor‐derived allopeptides through the indirect pathway of antigen presentation was not sufficient to induce cross‐tolerance to alloreactive CD8⁺ T cells responding to bm1 alloantigens in a murine model of skin allograft transplantation across an MHC class I mismatched barrier.     

Peritransplant VLA‐4 blockade inhibits endogenous memory CD8 T cell infiltration into high‐risk cardiac allografts and CTLA‐4Ig resistant rejection

Recipient endogenous memory CD8 T cells expressing reactivity to donor class I MHC infiltrate MHC‐mismatched cardiac allografts within 24 hours after reperfusion and express effector functions mediating graft injury. The current study tested the efficacy of Very Late Antigen‐4 (VLA‐4) blockade to inhibit endogenous memory CD8 T cell infiltration into cardiac allografts and attenuate early posttransplant inflammation. Peritransplant anti‐VLA‐4 mAb given to C57BL6 (H‐2^b) recipients of AJ (H‐2^a) heart allografts completely inhibited endogenous memory CD4 and CD8 T cell infiltration with significant decrease in macrophage, but not neutrophil, infiltration into allografts subjected to either minimal or prolonged cold ischemic storage (CIS) prior to transplant, reduced intra‐allograft IFN‐γ‐induced gene expression and prolonged survival of allografts subjected to prolonged CIS in CTLA‐4Ig treated recipients. Anti‐VLA‐4 mAb also inhibited priming of donor‐specific T cells producing IFN‐γ until at least day 7 posttransplant. Peritransplant anti‐VLA plus anti‐CD154 mAb treatment similarly prolonged survival of allografts subjected to minimal or increased CIS prior to transplant. Overall, these data indicate that peritransplant anti‐VLA‐4 mAb inhibits early infiltration memory CD8 T cell infiltration into allografts with a marked reduction in early graft inflammation suggesting an effective strategy to attenuate negative effects of heterologous alloimmunity in recipients of higher risk grafts.     

Pre‐clinical results in pig‐to‐non‐human primate islet xenotransplantation using anti‐CD40 antibody (2C10R4)‐based immunosuppression

Background

Islet transplantation is an effective therapy for selected patients with type 1 diabetes with labile glycemic control and hypoglycemic unawareness, but donor organs are limited. Islet xenotransplantation using porcine islets will potentially solve this problem. Although successful proof of concept studies using clinically inapplicable anti‐CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in pig‐to‐non‐human primate (NHP) islet xenotransplantation has been demonstrated by several groups worldwide, potentially clinically applicable anti‐CD40 (2C10R4) mAb‐based studies have not been reported.

Methods

Nine streptozotocin (STZ)‐induced diabetic rhesus monkeys were transplanted with adult porcine islets isolated from designated pathogen‐free (DPF) miniature pigs. They were treated with anti‐CD40 mAb‐based immunosuppressive regimen and were divided into 3 groups: anti‐CD40 only group (n = 2), belatacept group (anti‐CD40 mAb+belatacept, n = 2), and tacrolimus group (anti‐CD40 mAb+tacrolimus, n = 5). All monkeys received anti‐thymocyte globulin (ATG), cobra venom factor (CVF), adalimumab, and sirolimus. Blood glucose levels (BGL) and serum porcine C‐peptide concentrations were measured. Humoral and cellular immune responses were assessed by ELISA and ELISPOT, respectively. Liver biopsy and subsequent immunohistochemistry were conducted.

Results

All animals restored normoglycemia immediately after porcine islet transplantation and finished the follow‐up without any severe adverse effects except for one animal (R092). Most animals maintained their body weight. Median survival, as defined by a serum porcine C‐peptide concentration of >0.15 ng/mL, was 31, 27, and 60 days for anti‐CD40 only, belatacept, and tacrolimus groups, respectively. Anti‐αGal IgG levels in serum and the number of interferon‐γ secreting T cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells did not increase in most animals.

Conclusion

These results showed that anti‐CD40 mAb combined with tacrolimus was effective in prolonging porcine islet graft survival, but anti‐CD40 mAb was not as effective as anti‐CD154 mAb in terms of preventing early islet loss.     

CD154 Blockade Abrogates Allospecific Responses and Enhances CD4+ Regulatory T‐Cells in Mouse Orthotopic Lung Transplant

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a common and important clinical complication following lung transplantation. While there is a clinical need for the development of novel therapies to prevent ACR, the regulation of allospecific effector T‐cells in this process remains incompletely understood. Using the MHC‐mismatched mouse orthotopic lung transplant model, we investigated the short‐term role of anti‐CD154 mAb therapy alone on allograft pathology and alloimmune T‐cell effector responses. Untreated C57BL/6 recipients of BALB/c left lung allografts had high‐grade rejection and diminished CD4⁺: CD8⁺ graft ratios, marked by predominantly CD8⁺>CD4⁺ IFN‐γ⁺ allospecific effector responses at day 10, compared to isograft controls. Anti‐CD154 mAb therapy strikingly abrogated both CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ alloeffector responses and significantly increased lung allograft CD4⁺: CD8⁺ ratios. Examination of graft CD4⁺ T‐cells revealed significantly increased frequencies of CD4⁺CD25⁺Foxp3⁺ regulatory T‐cells in the lung allografts of anti‐CD154‐treated mice and was associated with significant attenuation of ACR compared to untreated controls. Together, these data show that CD154/CD40 costimulation blockade alone is sufficient to abrogate allospecific effector T‐cell responses and significantly shifts the lung allograft toward an environment predominated by CD4⁺ T regulatory cells in association with an attenuation of ACR.     

Transient Lymphopenia Breaks Costimulatory Blockade‐Based Peripheral Tolerance and Initiates Cardiac Allograft Rejection

Lymphopenia is induced by lymphoablative therapies and chronic viral infections. We assessed the impact of lymphopenia on cardiac allograft survival in recipients conditioned with peritransplant costimulatory blockade (CB) to promote long‐term graft acceptance. After vascularized MHC‐mismatched heterotopic heart grafts were stably accepted through CB, lymphopenia was induced on day 60 posttransplant by 6.5 Gy irradiation or by administration of anti‐CD4 plus anti‐CD8 mAb. Long‐term surviving allografts were gradually rejected after lymphodepletion (MST = 74 ± 5 days postirradiation). Histological analyses indicated signs of severe rejection in allografts following lymphodepletion, including mononuclear cell infiltration and obliterative vasculopathy. Lymphodepletion of CB conditioned recipients induced increases in CD44^high effector/memory T cells in lymphatic organs and strong recovery of donor‐reactive T cell responses, indicating lymphopenia‐induced proliferation (LIP) and donor alloimmune responses occurring in the host. T regulatory (CD4⁺ Foxp³⁺) cell and B cell numbers as well as donor‐specific antibody titers also increased during allograft rejection in CB conditioned recipients given lymphodepletion. These observations suggest that allograft rejection following partial lymphocyte depletion is mediated by LIP of donor‐reactive memory T cells. As lymphopenia may cause unexpected rejection of stable allografts, adequate strategies must be developed to control T cell proliferation and differentiation during lymphopenia.     

B Cell Depletion With an Anti‐CD20 Antibody Enhances Alloreactive Memory T Cell Responses After Transplantation

Alloreactive memory T cells mediate accelerated allograft rejection and transplant tolerance resistance. Recent studies have shown that B cell deficient–μMT mice fail to mount donor‐specific memory T cell responses after transplantation. At the same time, other studies showed that pretransplant B cell depletion using rituximab (IgG1 anti‐CD20 mAb) combined with cyclosporine A promoted the survival of islet allografts in monkeys. In this study, we investigated the effect of anti‐CD20 antibody‐mediated B cell depletion on the memory T cell alloresponse in mice. Wild‐type and anti‐OVA TCR transgenic mice were treated with an IgG2a anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody, which depleted nearly all B cells in the peripheral blood and secondary lymphoid organs but spared some B cells in the bone marrow. B cell depletion did not affect the direct alloresponse but resulted in a marked increase of indirect alloresponse after skin transplantation of naïve mice. Furthermore, in allosensitized mice, anti‐CD20 mAb treatment enhanced the reactivation of allospecific memory T cells and accelerated second set rejection of skin allografts. This suggests that the effect of anti‐CD20 antibodies on alloimmunity and allograft rejection might vary upon the nature of the antibodies as well as the circumstances under which they are delivered.     

Analysis of Human Biologics With a Mouse Skin Transplant Model in Humanized Mice

Preclinical testing of human therapeutic monoclonal antibodies has been limited in murine models due to species differences in pharmacokinetics and biologic responses. To overcome these constraints we developed a murine skin transplant model in humanized mice and used it to test human monoclonal antibody therapy. Neonatal NOD/SCID/IL2Rγc^null mice (NSG) were reconstituted with human CD34⁺ hematopoietic stem cells (hNSG). When adult, these mice rejected MHC mismatched murine C57BL/6J skin grafts. Rejection required adequate reconstitution with human cells. There was diffuse infiltration of the epidermis and dermis with hCD8 and hCD4 cells in rejected grafts by immunohistochemistry. Studies with B6/MHC class I and II knockout mice donors indicated that neither is required for rejection. Graft rejection was associated with the development of effector and central memory T cells and an increase in serum immunoglobulins. We also tested the effects of teplizumab (anti‐CD3 mAb) and found it could delay skin graft rejection, whereas ipilimumab (anti‐CTLA‐4 [cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte antigen‐4] mAb) treatment accelerated rejection. These findings demonstrate that hNSG mice reliably and predictably reject a xenogenic mouse skin graft by a human T cell mediated mechanism. The model can be utilized to investigate the ability of human immunotherapies to enhance or suppress functional human immune responses.     

Depletion‐Resistant CD4 T Cells Enhance Thymopoiesis During Lymphopenia

Lymphoablation is routinely used in transplantation, and its success is defined by the balance of pathogenic versus protective T cells within reconstituted repertoire. While homeostatic proliferation and thymopoiesis may both cause T cell recovery during lymphopenia, the relative contributions of these mechanisms remain unclear. The goal of this study was to investigate the role of the thymus during T cell reconstitution in adult allograft recipients subjected to lymphoablative induction therapy. Compared with euthymic mice, thymectomized heart allograft recipients demonstrated severely impaired CD4 and CD8 T cell recovery and prolonged heart allograft survival after lymphoablation with murine anti‐thymocyte globulin (mATG). The injection with agonistic anti‐CD40 mAb or thymus transplantation only partially restored T cell reconstitution in mATG‐treated thymectomized mice. After mATG depletion, residual CD4 T cells migrated into the thymus and enhanced thymopoiesis. Conversely, depletion of CD4 T cells before lymphoablation inhibited thymopoiesis at the stage of CD4^?CD8^?CD44^hiCD25⁺ immature thymocytes. This is the first demonstration that the thymus and peripheral CD4 T cells cooperate to ensure optimal T cell reconstitution after lymphoablation. Targeting thymopoiesis through manipulating functions of depletion‐resistant helper T cells may thus improve therapeutic benefits and minimize the risks of lymphoablation in clinical settings.