A survey of autologous blood collection and transfusion in Japan in 1997

BACKGROUND: In spite of the fact that autologous blood is safest for a patient to receive, it is not generally appreciated that adverse reactions during donation and transfusion may occur. This study was conducted to assess the state and the risk of autologous blood transfusion in Japan in 1997. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Results of a nation-wide questionnaire-based survey are presented. The questionnaire assessed the number of autologous blood donations, donation procedures, and the adverse reactions associated with donation, preservation, recombination erythropoietin administration and transfusion. RESULTS: Between November 1996 and October 1997, 10,697,000 ml (or 53,485 units, 200 ml = 1 unit) prestorage blood donation were made by 14,200 patients (averages; 1.9 donations/patient, 753 ml/patient, 398 ml/donation). Of these, 87% were transfused to the patients and the remainder were discarded. Using hemodilution and blood salvage intra- or postoperatively some 2,540,000 ml of blood was collected and > 70% of patient-donors received such blood. Adverse reactions were observed with 1.6% (428/26,905) of donations including 6 angina and 2 asthma attacks. There were 63 (0.2%) problems with 28,705 donations and 117 (0.5%) errors/problems reported for 24,929 units transfused; the most frequent problems were clotting on the units and breakage of the bags during storage. Hypotension using hemodilution (3.7%), coagulation (0.9%) or bacterial contamination (0.4%) using salvage were often observed. A 10-20 ml volume of autologous fresh-frozen plasma was transfused to the wrong recipient. CONCLUSION: Autologous blood transfusion accounts for at least 1.1% (2.8% estimated) of the red cell supply in Japan. Errors and adverse reactions are not infrequent in autologous blood programmes. By introducing systematic safety policies, we will be able to make autologous blood transfusion safer.     

Severe outcomes of allogeneic and autologous blood donation: frequency and characterization

BACKGROUND: There are few published data on severe outcomes of the donation of blood for allogeneic or autologous use. It would be helpful if blood collectors could better characterize and/or predict the likelihood of significant complications of blood donation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Very severe outcome (VSO) was defined as an event requiring hospitalization. Approximately 4.1 million American Red Cross whole-blood donation records (July 1993-March 1994) were reviewed for the incidence and type of VSO. RESULTS: A total of 33 VSOs occurred for all donations. The incidence of VSOs for allogeneic donation was 1 (0.0005%) in 198,119 and that for autologous donation was 1 (0.006%) in 16,783 (p < 0.001). First-time donors were three times as likely to have a VSO. Donors > 40 years old had 87.9 percent of the VSOs, and donors > 60 years old had 48.5 percent. Vasovagal (66.7%) and anginal (12.1%) episodes were the most frequent complications, and 66.7 percent of reactions occurred at the blood collection site. The mean hospital stay was 1.9 days. CONCLUSION: VSO is an infrequent complication of all types of blood donation, but its occurrence may be associated with significant morbidity and cost. VSO is nearly 12 times as likely in autologous blood donors.     

Autologous blood donation and subsequent blood use in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty

Autologous blood donation is designed to avoid complications from allogeneic blood, leaving units of blood in the general blood supply. It is unclear how efficient these programmes are in accomplishing these goals. It is unclear if autologous donation provokes increased need for any transfusion following surgery and whether it can be avoided in low-risk surgeries. Of 430 patients undergoing unilateral primary knee replacement arthroplasty over 12 months in our hospital, 309 had autologous donations and 121 did not. Of the 121 patients who did not donate, 36% completed surgery without transfusion, whereas only 17% of those who had autologous donations did so (P < 0.05). Age less than 65 years, higher baseline and postoperative haemoglobin levels were associated with lower transfusion rates. Patients who had autologous donations were approximately four times more likely to be transfused. As the number of autologous units donated increased, transfusions following surgery increased. Autologous donation did reduce allogeneic blood transfusions. Therefore, autologous blood donation for unilateral total knee arthroplasty is associated with overall increased transfusion rates, but with reduced need for allogeneic blood, independent of other clinical factors associated with transfusion. Therefore, there is need for reconsideration of these programmes relative to specific surgeries.     

Regional and temporal variation in American Red Cross blood donations, 1995 to 2005

BACKGROUND: Maintaining a stable blood supply is a critical goal of the American Red Cross Blood Services. Extensive Red Cross data provided the opportunity to assess both long-term and short-term trends in the variation of weekly blood donations. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Overall trends and week-to-week variation in donation rates were assessed in volunteer, whole-blood donations from 1995 to 2005 among three Red Cross donor regions: the Connecticut region, the Greater Chesapeake and Potomac (Maryland) region, and the Southern California region, adjusting for population change, calendar time, age, sex, and donor region. RESULTS: Weekly donation rates varied widely by region, ranging from 3.5 donations per 10,000 persons in Southern California to 10.2 donations per 10,000 in Connecticut. Week-to-week variation in donation rates within each region was also quite high. Typical swings in weekly donation rates ranged from 38 percent in Connecticut to 56 percent in Southern California. Week-to-week variation was also 103 percent higher (95% confidence interval [CI], 87%-120%) among 18- to 24-year-old donors, compared to 25- to 44-year-olds, ranging from 32 to 49 percent. By comparison, week-to-week variation among adults 25 and older was more stable, ranging from 16 to 21 percent. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that there is a great deal of variation in donation rates, particularly among the youngest donors. Improving recruitment and retention among these donors will be critical to maintaining an adequate blood supply as the donor population ages.     

The impact of H1N1 influenza A virus pandemic on the blood donations in Hyogo Prefecture,Japan

BACKGROUND: The impact of the H1N1 influenza on blood donation is unknown. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined number of blood donors presenting to blood donation centers or bloodmobiles using a blood donation database of Red Cross Hyogo Prefectural Blood Center between 4 weeks before and after May 16, 2009, respectively, when the first case of H1N1 influenza was confirmed in Kobe. The numbers of blood donors per donation site (i.e., blood donation centers and bloodmobiles) and per blood products (i.e., red blood cells [RBCs], platelet [PLT]‐poor plasma, and PLTs) were also examined. RESULTS: The number of blood donors decreased by 21% and whole blood donations declined by 1329 units within 1 week of the first case of H1N1 influenza. While number of blood donors showed a rapid decrease, blood donations returned to the normal level within 1 week. This quick recovery was attributed to the diligent efforts made by Red Cross Centers, including the use of e‐mail to encourage blood donation, on‐the‐street campaigns, and requesting new bloodmobile drives in workplaces and universities. RBCs that were donated in bloodmobiles was predominantly affected; the number of blood donors in bloodmobiles decreased by 39%. CONCLUSION: H1N1 influenza pandemic had a great but transient impact on blood donation.     

连续捐献单采血小板献血者血红蛋白和铁蛋白状况调查及分析

目的 调查连续捐献单采血小板对献血者血红蛋白和铁蛋白的影响.方法 选择2018年3-6月北京市红十字血液中心男性献血者73名(平均献血周期为15.26d),依据5次献血的铁蛋白水平分为第1组(n=21,≥30 μg/L)、第2组(n=23,＜30pug/L)和第3组(n=29,在30 μg/L上下变化),对其连续捐献5...     

Errors in the administration of intravenous medication in Brazilian hospitals

Aim. To verify the frequency of errors in the preparation and administration of intravenous medication in three Brazilian hospitals in the State of Bahia. Background. The administration of intravenous medications constitutes a central activity in Brazilian nursing. Errors in performing this activity may result in irreparable damage to patients and may compromise the quality of care. Design. Cross‐sectional study, conducted in three hospitals in the State of Bahia, Brazil. Methods. Direct observation of the nursing staff (nurse technicians, auxiliary nurses and nurse attendants), preparing and administering intravenous medication. Results. When preparing medication, wrong patient error did not occur in any of the three hospitals, whereas omission dose was the most frequent error in all study sites. When administering medication, the most frequent errors in the three hospitals were wrong dose and omission dose. Conclusions. The rates of error found are considered low compared with similar studies. The most frequent types of errors were wrong dose and omission dose. The hospitals studied showed different results with the smallest rates of errors occurring in hospital 1 that presented the best working conditions. Relevance to clinical practice. Studies such as this one have the potential to improve the quality of care.     

Utility of red blood cell apheresis in autologous blood donation

Although autologous blood donation is an alternative to allogeneic transfusion, some authors had questioned its cost-effectiveness. New techniques, like red blood cell apheresis could improve the cost-effectiveness of autologous blood transfusion, therefore we have valued the efficiency of this procedure in autologous blood donation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 131 patients undergoing different types of surgery who entered the preoperative autologous blood donation program over a one year period. Apheresis was performed with the MCS 3p from Haemeonetics. RESULTS: We were able to collect 304 red blood cell units from 131 patients. The average yield per procedure was two units (88 cases, 67.2%). In 41 patients (31.3%), we collected 3 units and, in two cases, 4 units were collected. The mean volume of the units was 255 (191-280). 18 (13.7% patients had an adverse reaction. Most of these were mild. Only in one case was it necessary to stop the procedure. 202 units (66.4%) were transfused to 97 patients (74%). 12 (9.2%) patients also used allogeneic transfusions (mean units: 0.18+/-0.05 with a range 1-5). CONCLUSION: Red blood cell apheresis is a useful procedure in autologous blood donation.     

Donors' blood group declaration before donation can be used as a tool for electronic crossmatching

Electronic crossmatching (E-XM) is used to detect ABO incompatibility. In developing countries, as many of the donations are from first-time donors, it is difficult to guarantee the accuracy of the ABO/Rh label on these units to use them for E-XM. This problem was overcome with a new software 'hemosoft', using donors' blood group declaration before donation as a tool for E-XM. During registration, donors either declare their blood group or give no comment. For, ABO/Rh grouping, either two results from different donations or only one in concordant with the declaration before donation is needed. If there is a conflict, second typing is performed from the unit segment. If donors give no declaration, two different technicians perform typing, one from the sample tube and the other from the unit segment. Of 18,618 donations performed, 640 (3%) were repeated and the rest were first-time donations. In 16,327, typing was performed once, as the blood group declaration and the typing results were identical. In 2407, grouping was performed twice, as donors gave no declaration or conflicts between declaration and typing results were found. No labelling or wrong unit-release errors were detected in units donated, typed and labelled in our centre. In 26,402 donations, 16,314 (61.8%) E-XMs were performed. No major haemolytic transfusion reaction was recorded. Donors' ABO/Rh declaration before donation can be used as a tool for E-XM, instead of the requirement for serological confirmation or a second donation to guarantee grouping.     

Infectious disease markers in autologous and directed donations

SUMMARY. Autologous collections are strongly advocated by the New South Wales Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service (BTS) and have increased more than sevenfold since 1988. Directed donations, although not promoted, have also increased during this time. The prevalence of infectious disease markers (HIV, hepatitis C, hepatitis B and syphilis) in donations collected by the BTS from different donor groups including overall volunteer homologous, first-time volunteer homologous, autologous and directed were evaluated over a 42-month period. Donations from first-time volunteer homologous donors had the highest prevalence of hepatitis B and C. Autologous donations had a significantly higher prevalence of hepatitis B, hepatitis C and syphilis compared with overall volunteer homologous donations. The percentage of directed donations testing positive for either hepatitis B or C was higher than overall volunteer homologous donations, but not statistically significant. This study demonstrates that donations from first-time donors are the least safe, that the crossover of autologous blood into the volunteer homologous pool decreases the safety of that pool and suggests that directed donations may not be as safe as volunteer homologous donations and cannot be generally advocated at this time.     

A comparison of human immunodeficiency virus,hepatitis C virus,hepatitis B virus,and human T‐lymphotropic virus marker rates for directed versus volunteer blood donations to the American Red Cross during 2005 to 2010

BACKGROUND: At most US blood centers, patients may still opt to choose specific donors to give blood for their anticipated transfusion needs. However, there is little evidence of improved safety with directed donation when compared to volunteer donation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The percentage of directed donations made to the American Red Cross (ARC) from 1995 to 2010 was determined. Infectious disease marker rates for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and human T‐lymphotropic virus (HTLV) were calculated for volunteer and directed donations made from 2005 to 2010. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare marker‐positive rates of directed donations to volunteer donations. RESULTS: The percentage of donations from directed donors declined from 1.6% in 1995 to 0.12% in 2010. From 2005 to 2010, the ARC collected 38,894,782 volunteer and 69,869 directed donations. Rates of HIV, HCV, HBV, and HTLV for volunteer donations were 2.9, 32.2, 12.4, and 2.5 per 100,000 donations, respectively; for directed, the rates were 7.2, 93.0, 40.1, and 18.6 per 100,000. After demographics and first‐time or repeat status were adjusted for, corresponding ORs of viral marker positivity in directed versus volunteer donations were not significant for HIV, HBV, or HTLV and significant for HCV (OR, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.50‐0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Directed donations have declined by 92% at the ARC since 1995, but have higher viral marker rates than volunteer donations. The difference can be explained in part by the effects of first‐time or repeat status of the donors. Patients considering directed donation should be appropriately counseled about the potential risks.     

Blood safety measures and the role of central blood institute in Japan

<正>1 Japanese Blood ProgrammeJapanese Red Cross Blood Service is the sole conductor of blood service in Japan.It collects 5.3 million voluntary non-remunerated donations from 127 million populations and distributes 18 million units ( one unit=200 ml,2 million Liter) blood matching the medical needs.A part of plasma is supplied to the JRCBS fractionation center and other 3 commercial manufacturers for production of plasma derivatives.     

A study of an educational intervention to decrease inappropriate preoperative autologous blood donation: its effectiveness and the effect on subsequent transfusion rates in elective hysterectomy

BACKGROUND: Decreasing the overcollection of preoperative autologous blood is difficult to achieve. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an educational intervention designed to outline the risks of preoperative autologous collection can decrease such donations and, if so, to determine how this decrease will affect subsequent transfusion rates. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An educational intervention consisting of a didactic presentation to the Department of Gynecology staff about the risks and benefits of autologous blood was implemented. Written material with similar information was given to patients. Subsequently, the percentage of patients donating autologous blood, the number of autologous units donated, and the rates of transfusion in patients eligible for autologous donation who were admitted for elective abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy were measured. These rates were compared to those in similar patients admitted in the 2 years before the educational intervention. RESULTS: After an educational intervention, the proportion of patients donating autologous blood decreased from 53 percent to 26 percent (p<0.01), and the number of units collected per patient decreased from 0.86 to 0.31 (p<0.01); this resulted in a savings of 80 autologous donations per year. Despite no difference in estimated blood loss (p = 0.46), the overall transfusion rate decreased from 10 percent to 3.7 percent (p = 0.03), while the allogeneic transfusion rate demonstrated no significant change (1.1% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: Unnecessary preoperative autologous donations by elective hysterectomy patients can be decreased by educating physicians and patients about the risks of preoperative autologous blood donation. Decreasing such unnecessary donations can decrease the subsequent autologous transfusion rate, with its attendant risks, without increasing the risk of allogeneic transfusion.     

The American Red Cross donor hemovigilance program: complications of blood donation reported in 2006

BACKGROUND: The American Red Cross (ARC) initiated a comprehensive donor hemovigilance program in 2003. We provide an overview of reported complications after whole blood (WB), apheresis platelet (PLT), or automated red cell (R2) donation and analyze factors contributing to the variability in reported complication rates in our national program. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Complications recorded at the collection site or reported after allogeneic WB, apheresis PLT, and R2 donation procedures in 36 regional blood centers in 2006 were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Complications after 6,014,472 WB, 449,594 PLT, and 228,183 R2 procedures totaled 209,815, 25,966, and 12,282 (348.9, 577.5, and 538.3 per 10,000 donations), respectively, the vast majority of which were minor presyncopal reactions and small hematomas. Regional center, donor age, sex, and donation status were independently associated with complication rates after WB, PLT, and R2 donation. Seasonal variability in complications rates after WB and R2 donation correlated with the proportion of donors under 20 years old. Excluding large hematomas, the overall rate of major complications was 7.4, 5.2, and 3.3 per 10,000 collections for WB, PLT, and R2 procedures, respectively. Outside medical care was recorded at similar rates for both WB and automated collections (3.2 vs. 2.9 per 10,000 donations, respectively). CONCLUSION: The ARC data describe the current risks of blood donation in a model multicenter hemovigilance system using standardized definitions and reporting protocols. Reported reaction rates varied by regional center independently of donor demographics, limiting direct comparison of different regional blood centers.     

Directed-donor programs may adversely affect autologous donor participation

One hundred autologous whole blood donors (11 men, 89 women; 49 preoperative, 51 prenatal) completed a questionnaire concerning their motivations as autologous donors, their perceptions of the relative safety of blood donor options, and their interest in directed donations. Concern about acquiring AIDS from transfusion was the most prevalent reason for autologous donation. Nearly all participants knew that autologous blood was safer than volunteer blood, and most also believed that directed-donor blood was safer than volunteer blood. Most would have used a directed-donor program if available, particularly if they were ineligible as autologous donors. Furthermore, their interest in directed donations was unaffected by written material, provided pathway through the questionnaire, that included a statement that no scientific evidence exists to support directed donations' being safer than volunteer blood. One donor in five believed that autologous and directed donations were equivalent in safety, and 19 (15 of whom were prenatal donors) indicated that they probably or surely would not have participated in the autologous program if directed donations had been available. This study demonstrates that a sizable proportion of autologous donor candidates might not participate if a directed donation program were available. The unrestricted availability of directed donations may thus contribute to suboptimal use of autologous donor programs.     

Predictive value of past and current screening tests for syphilis in blood donors: changing from a rapid plasma reagin test to an automated specific treponemal test for screening

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the change from a rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test to an automated specific treponemal test (PK-TP) in screening for syphilis in blood donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A cross-sectional seroprevalence analysis was performed on 4,878,215 allogeneic blood donations from 19 American Red Cross Blood Services regions from May 1993 through September 1995. Positive predictive values relative to the confirmatory fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test (FTA-ABS) were calculated. Differences in seroprevalence were compared in RPR and PK-TP tests for 1) unconfirmed and confirmed tests, 2) first-time and repeat donors, and 3) "recent" versus "past" infections. Donation data from three additional Red Cross regions were evaluated for repeat donation patterns of blood donors who had a donation that was positive in a serologic screening test for syphilis. The value of RPR and PK-TP tests as surrogate markers for HIV infection was compared. RESULTS: Reactive rates were lower but the positive predictive values was higher for the PK-TP test than for the RPR test. Initially, donors screened by PK-TP were more likely to be confirmed as positive than were donors screened by RPR, but these rates became comparable. It is estimated that a single HIV window-period donation was removed by serologic testing for syphilis each year of this study period. CONCLUSIONS: The change to the PK-TP test resulted in a lower repeatedly reactive rate, better prediction that a confirmed-positive test for syphilis would occur in testing in the FTA-ABS, fewer donations lost, and comparable deferral rates. Because of the high rate of reactivity to serologic testing for syphilis among donors previously confirmed positive for syphilis, indefinite deferral after a confirmed-positive index donation may be warranted. Serologic testing for syphilis is ineffective as a marker of HIV-infectious window-period donations.     

Increased iron absorption during autologous blood donation supported by recombinant human erythropoietin therapy

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) therapy improves the success of autologous blood (AB) donation programs before elective surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate iron absorption during an AB donation program with or without rHuEPO. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients were randomly assigned among placebo (Group 1) or 300 (Group 2) or 600 UI per kg rHuEPO (Group 3) on the first, second, and third donation visits. All patients also received daily oral iron (200 mg Fe(+)). RESULTS: The number of units collected in Group 3 was higher than in Group 1 (4.6 +/- 0.5 vs. 3.6 +/- 0.8 units; p < 0.01). Red blood cell (RBC) production increased in a rHuEPO dose-dependent manner. With rHuEPO, the RBC volume collected per unit presented a lower decrease with number of donated units than with placebo and was similar to that of homologous blood units. Storage iron did not influence the number of units collected, whereas circulating mobilizable iron was the limiting factor. Oral iron absorption increased in a rHuEPO dose-dependent manner (12-fold with 600 UI/kg rHuEPO) and was proportional to erythropoietic activity. CONCLUSION: rHuEPO does not only improve the number of AB units collected but also their quality. Storage iron cannot meet marrow iron requirements, but rHuEPO strongly increased oral iron absorption in a dose-dependent fashion through stimulation of erythropoietic activity.     

Two-years' experience with a Canadian hospital-based autologous blood donor programme

SUMMARY. Two years' experience with a hospital-based autologous blood donor programme is described. Of 511 patients enrolled, 86% underwent surgery without use of allogeneic blood, and 19% of collected units were not used. For six common procedures, a 'target' autologous blood schedule of 2 or 3 units (depending on the procedure) was set. If an extra unit for each of 407 patients had been collected (i.e. 3 or 4), an additional 20 patients would have been protected from exposure to allogeneic blood at a cost of 387 unnecessary collections. The difference between the mean haemoglobin (Hb) concentration at entry to the programme and the mean pre-operative Hb concentration was not clinically important and only 25 of 511 patients were deferred on account of anaemia after one or more donations. The autologous blood used represents 3.8% of the units of blood or packed red blood cells transfused during the 2 years of study. Adverse (vasovagal) reactions were infrequent (2.2%) in spite of liberal acceptance criteria.     

Crossover use of donated blood for autologous transfusion: report of the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists concerning whether the costs and potential risks outweigh the potential benefits of "crossover" use in the general blood supply of unutilized blood that was donated for autologous transfusion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Published articles and reports were identified through systematic search of MEDLINE and review of references cited in previously identified articles, textbooks, and reports. Consultation was made with experts in blood donation and transfusion. Additional peer review was received from the American Medical Association (AMA) Council on Scientific Affairs RESULTS: Concern over infectious disease transmission has led to increased interest in and support for autologous transfusion for individuals having planned surgeries. Different requirements exist for collection, labeling, and screening of blood to be used for autologous versus allogeneic transfusions; therefore, procedures for diverting autologous blood donations to the general blood supply involve considerable expense. Several cost-effectiveness studies of autologous blood donation and transfusion conclude that currently this "crossover" appears to be an expensive procedure yielding little increased benefit from a societal perspective. CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations in this report were adopted as AMA Policy at the AMA Annual Meeting in June 1997. The AMA does not encourage blood collection programs to "cross over" units donated for autologous use to the allogeneic blood supply. Practice guidelines are needed, and should be utilized to ensure parsimony in the use of autologous blood donations and transfusions.     

The impact of a patient education program on directed donations

The effect of an informational program in which the benefits and disadvantages of directed donations are discussed directly with the prospective recipient of the blood and/or that patient's family was examined during a 20-month period. Data collected for 27 regional Connecticut hospitals that accept directed donations were compared with similar data for Hartford Hospital, an 885-bed tertiary-care facility. The number of directed-donor units (68) collected by the American Red Cross Blood Services for Hartford Hospital during the study period was comparable to the number (average, 62.3) provided for smaller (301-450 beds) institutions in the state. The percentage that directed-donor units drawn for Hartford Hospital represented of the total number of homologous units provided (0.23%) was less than that for any of the categories of hospitals, by size, in the state. Supplying the patient and/or the patient's family, in a personalized manner, with information concerning the advantages and disadvantages of directed as well as of volunteer donor blood can result in a marked overall reduction in the number of directed donations and also serves to reassure those concerned about blood transfusion.