Combination chemotherapy of biweekly irinotecan (CPT-11) plus tegafur/uracil (UFT) and leucovorin (LV) for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: phase I/II study in Japanese patients

Purpose  We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combination chemotherapy with biweekly irinotecan (CPT-11) plus oral tegafur/uracil (UFT) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma in phase I/II setting. Patients and methods  We recruited 37 patients with histologically proven metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. UFT (300 mg/m² per day) and LV (75 mg/day) were administered orally on days 1–21. CPT-11 was administered intravenously on day 1 and 15, at an initial dose of 60 mg/m², stepping up to 150 mg/m² in a traditional phase I fashion. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks. After patients enrolled into a phase II portion, the efficacy and toxicity of this regimen were also assessed. Results  The recommended dose of CPT-11 was determined to be 150 mg/m². Although one patient had a pulmonary embolism after 60 mg/m² of CPT-11, the treatment was well tolerated in general. The overall objective response rate was 37.8% (14/37; 95% CI, 22.5–55.2) in all patients. Median progression-free survival was 226 days (95% CI, 133–276). Conclusions  Biweekly CPT-11 plus UFT and LV had a reasonable safety profile with manageable toxicity, and had a promising activity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Further trials are indicated based on the promising results observed in this study.     

Biweekly oxaliplatin plus 1-day infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin followed by metronomic chemotherapy with tegafur/uracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose Metronomic chemotherapy, at a minimally toxic dose and with a frequent schedule, is a potentially novel approach to the control of advanced cancer disease via a different mechanism from maximum tolerable doses chemotherapy. Taking advantage of the potential effectiveness of metronomic therapy, tegafur/uracil (UFT) was incorporated into an oxaliplation/infusioanl fluouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) protocol in this study. The primary endpoints were response rate, time to progression (TTP) and safety profile in 5-FU-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancers (CRCs). Patients and methods Twenty-eight patients with metastatic CRCs resistant or refractory to 5-FU/LV were enrolled. Chemotherapy was administrated every 2 weeks sequentially with 2-h infusion of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m²) and LV (200 mg/m²), intravenous bolus 5-FU (400 mg/m²), 22-h infusion of 5-FU (600 mg/m²) on day 1 and then followed by 10-day daily oral UFT (200 mg/m²)/LV (30 mg/m²). Results Partial response was seen in ten (35.7%) patients. The median TTP was 5.2 (95% CI: 4.16–6.31) months and the median overall survival was 13.4 (95% CI: 6.39–20.5) months. No grade 3 toxicities above 5% according to National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) occurred except sensory neuropathy (10.7%). No grade 4 toxicity, treatment-related mortality or hand–foot syndrome was found. Conclusions This study protocol with favorable toxicity profile is thus promisingly effective against 5-FU-pretreated metastatic CRCs. Given the present experience, an evaluation of the regimen as front-line treatment of metastatic CRC is planned.     

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral uracil,ftorafur, and leucovorin in patients with advanced cancer

 A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral uracil, ftorafur, and leucovorin was performed in patients with advanced cancer. Uracil plus ftorafur (UFT) was given in a 4:1 molar ratio in three divided doses for 28 consecutive days. Patient cohorts were treated at 200, 250, 300, and 350 mg/m² of UFT daily. For all patients, 150 mg of leucovorin was given daily in three oral doses. A 1-week rest period followed each 28-day treatment course. Gastrointestinal toxicity, characterized by diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting, was dose-limiting at 350 mg/m² UFT in patients who had received prior chemotherapy. Mild fatigue and transient hyperbilirubinemia were also common. In previously untreated patients, UFT at 350 mg/m² was well-tolerated, suggesting this as an acceptable phase II dose in this schedule with leucovorin. Two of eight previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer had partial responses with UFT (350 mg/m²) plus leucovorin. Pharmacokinetic parameters [ftorafur, uracil, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-methyltetrahydrofolate] showed wide interpatient variations. Plasma levels of 5-FU (C_max 1.4±1.9 μM) were comparable to those achieved with protracted venous infusions, and folate levels (C_max 6.1±3.6 μM) were sufficient for biochemical modulation. Ongoing study will determine if this convenient oral regimen will compare favorably in terms of efficacy, toxicity, and cost with intravenous fluoropyrimidine programs. Received: 20 January 1995/Accepted: 29 June 1995     

A phase II study of UFT with leucovorin administered as a twice daily schedule in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Prolonged infusions have been shown to be safer and potentially more effective than bolus regimens of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, infusional 5-FU requires central venous access and costly infusion pumps. Oral fluoropyrimidines enable longer exposures to 5-FU with increased convenience. Tegafur-uracil (UFT) with leucovorin (LV) given thrice daily has improved safety plus comparable survival and response rates to bolus 5-FU/LV. We conducted a phase II clinical study in 98 patients with mCRC to evaluate if UFT with LV given twice daily provided comparable time to progression (TTP), efficacy and tolerability to that reported for thrice daily in two phase III clinical studies. Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Median TTP was 3.8 months, when compared with 3.5 months for thrice daily. The ORR (11%) and median OS (12.8 months) with twice daily administration were similar to that of thrice daily administration (12% and 12.4 months). The incidence of grade 3/4 treatment-related diarrhoea was 30% on the twice daily and 21% on the thrice daily schedule. These results suggest that twice daily administration has similar efficacy and tolerability to thrice daily administration and is an acceptable alternative for patients who would benefit from UFT with LV therapy.     

Phase I trial of Orzel (UFT plus leucovorin), cisplatin, and radiotherapy in the treatment of potentially resectable esophageal cancer

PURPOSE: Fluorinated pyrimidines have been established as radiosensitizers in the combined modality therapy of esophageal cancer. UFT, an oral combination of a 5-fluorouracil pro-drug (uracil) and a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor (ftorafur), may provide improvement in the ease of administration with equal efficacy. This Phase I study was designed to determine the maximal tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of UFT, leucovorin, and cisplatin when given with radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of resectable esophageal cancer. METHODS: Chemotherapy consisted of i.v. cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) (Days 1 and 22) and UFT with leucovorin orally on Days 1-35. UFT was escalated in 50-mg/m(2) increments, starting at 200 mg/m(2)/d. Radiotherapy consisted of 4500 cGy in 25 fractions. Patients underwent resection 4-6 weeks after chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: Ten patients with resectable esophageal cancer were enrolled. Of the 7 patients entered at dose level 1, 1 developed a dose-limiting toxicity of nausea. All 3 patients entered at dose level 2 developed dose-limiting toxicity. The maximal tolerated dose for UFT was the starting level, 200 mg/m(2)/d. Of the 10 patients enrolled, 8 underwent esophagectomy and 2 developed progressive disease and did not undergo surgery. The disease of 6 of the 8 patients was downstaged at surgery. CONCLUSION: The recommended UFT dose for Phase II studies is 200 mg/m(2)/d given orally in two divided doses when given with leucovorin, cisplatin, and radiotherapy.     

Phase II trial of uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: A University of Chicago phase II consortium study

Background/objectives: Uracil and tegafur in a 4 : 1 molar concentration ratio (UFT; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT) has broad anti-tumor activity for cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract. However, there are no published data regarding the efficacy of leucovorin-modulated UFT in patients with pancreatic cancer. The objective of this trial was to determine the activity and evaluate the toxicity of UFT plus oral calcium leucovorin in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Patients and methods: Fourteen patients with advanced measurable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were enrolled onto the trial. Patients received 300 mg/m²/d UFT plus 90 mg/d leucovorin administered orally in divided doses every eight hours for 28 days repeated every 35 days. Objective tumor response was evaluated after two courses of therapy.Results: Fourteen patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. No objective responses were seen. The median (range) time to progression and survival were 14 (1.6–37), and 15 (1.9–62) weeks, respectively. Toxicity was mild with severe (grade 3 or 4) hyperbilirubinemia, pain, diarrhea, transaminitis, venous thrombus, weakness, renal failure, confusion, and edema/ascites seen in three (21%), one (7%), two (14%), one (7%), one (7%), one (7%), one (7%), one (7%), and two (14%) patients, respectively.Conclusion: In the 14 patients evaluable, UFT 300 mg/m²/d plus oral leucovorin 90 mg/d administered for 28 days did not demonstrate anti-tumor activity against advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma; however, this oral regimen was well tolerated and devoid of neutropenia, significant oral mucositis or diarrhea.     

A phase II study with CPT-11 plus leucovorin and bolus IV 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

Standard chemotherapy in advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC) has not yet been established. The present study was conducted to assess the efficacy and toxicity profile of CPT-11, leucovorin (LV), and bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in a weekly schedule. Fifty-five patients were entered with no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease or adjuvant treatment ended at least 6 months preceding study entry, and 45 were assessable for response. Patients were treated with CPT-11 80 mg/m² (7 patients) or 70 mg/m² (48 patients). After completion of CPT-11 infusion, LV 200 mg/m² was administered over 2 hr followed immediately by 5-FU 450 mg/m², IV bolus, weekly for 6 weeks followed by a 2-week rest period. Treatment was continued for four cycles. Because of grade 3 and 4 diarrhea in four of the first seven patients, the study was amended to reduce the starting dose of CPT-11 from 80 to 70 mg/m² weekly. Four complete and 10 partial responses were observed (response rate: 25.5%), the median time to progression (TTP) was 7.7 months, 1-year survival rate was 62.3%, and the median overall survival was 15.0 months. Grade 3 and 4 diarrhea occurred in seven patients (12.7%), four of them treated with CPT-11 80 mg/m². Grade 3 myelotoxicity occurred in five patients (9.0%). Toxic death because of diarrhea, neutropenia, bacteremia, and sepsis occurred in a patient treated with CPT-11 80 mg/m². Our results confirm the efficacy of CPT-11, LV, and 5-FU in a weekly schedule in patients with advanced CRC. Further studies are needed to compare the present regimen with higher doses of CPT-11 with LV plus different schedules of 5-FU administration in the treatment of metastatic CRC.     

Alternating irinotecan with oxaliplatin combined with UFT plus leucovorin (SCOUT) in metastatic colorectal cancer

Tegafur-uracil (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV, folinic acid) with alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin were effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a phase I study. This study expanded the maximum tolerated dose group. Patients aged >or=18 years had histologically confirmed, inoperable, previously untreated, measurable mCRC. Patients received irinotecan 180 mg m(-2) on day 1, oxaliplatin 100 mg m(-2) on day 15 and UFT 250 mg m(-2) plus LV 90 mg on days 1-21 every 28 days. The phase I/II study comprised 45 patients, 29 at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The response rate in 38 evaluable patients was 63% (95% confidence interval (CI): 49-80). Median time to progression and overall survival were 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.9-10.4) and 16.8 months (95% CI: 9.6-25.3), respectively. In the MTD group, one patient had grade 3 leucopenia; one had grade 3 neutropaenia; three had grade 3 diarrhoea; and one had grade 3 neurotoxicity. No hand-foot syndrome grade >1 was seen. In total, 67% of eligible patients received second-line therapy. UFT plus LV with alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin is an efficacious first-line treatment for mCRC, with minimal neurotoxicity and hand-foot syndrome.     

Oral uracil and Ftorafur plus leucovorin: pharmacokinetics and toxicity in patients with metastatic cancer

Purpose: To assess the pharmacokinetics of Ftorafur (tegafur, FT), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and uracil in 31 cancer patients who were enrolled in phase I studies of oral uracil and FT (UFT). The correlation between pharmacokinetic parameters and toxic effects of UFT was evaluated. Methods: Uracil and FT were orally administered in a 4:1 molar ratio at FT doses of 200–400 mg/m² per day. Patients also received leucovorin at 150 mg/day. Daily doses were divided into three doses and administered at 8-h intervals for 28 consecutive days. Plasma FT concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, and plasma 5-FU and uracil concentrations were determined using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. National Institutes of Health Common Toxicity Criteria were used for assessment of toxicity. Results: The concentrations of FT, 5-FU, and uracil showed wide interpatient variations. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cp_max) of all three compounds were achieved in 0.3 to 4.0 h. At the various study doses, the terminal half-life (t_1/2β) of FT ranged from 3.9 to 5.9 h, the area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC_0–6h) ranged from 16,220 to 52,446 (ng/ml)h, the total clearance (Cl_T) ranged from 100 to 175 ml/min, and the steady-state volume of distribution (Vd_ss) ranged from 18.3 to 28.7 l. The 5-FU generated from FT had an apparent distribution half-life (t_1/2α) and an apparent elimination half-life (t_1/2β) of 0.3–1.3 h and 4.9–7.0 h, respectively. The AUC_0–6h of 5-FU ranged from 120 to 325 (ng/ml)h. Uracil had a t_1/2α of 0.2–0.5 h and the level quickly returned to the endogenous level. The AUC_0–6h for uracil ranged from 605 to 3764 (ng/ml)h, the Cl_T ranged from 3225 to 7748 ml/min, and the Vd_ss ranged from 341 to 1354 l. The Cp_max and AUC_0–6h of both FT and uracil were significantly correlated with FT doses (P-values of 0.0244 and 0.0112) and with uracil doses (P-values of 0.0346 and 0.0083), respectively. In addition to interpatient variations, intrapatient variations were also observed in six patients who had pharmacology studies done on days 1 and 26 ± 2 at the same study dose. We found that the repeated treatment with UFT caused cumulative increases in the values of Cp_max, C_trough, and AUC_0–6h of FT and 5-FU. The major toxic effects observed were diarrhea and nausea and vomiting. The occurrence of these toxic effects correlated significantly with the Cp_max and AUC_0–6h of 5-FU. Conclusions: The pharmacology studies showed that FT and uracil were readily absorbed orally and that FT was rapidly converted to 5-FU. The preliminary findings suggest that determination of plasma levels of 5-FU after oral administration of UFT may help predict subsequent toxic effects. Received: 2 September 1999 / Accepted: 14 April 2000     

Phase II study of UFT with leucovorin and irinotecan (TEGAFIRI): first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer

This phase II trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of oral tegafur-uracil (UFT) with leucovorin (LV) combined with intravenous (i.v.) irinotecan every 3 weeks (TEGAFIRI) as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients received oral UFT 250 mg m(-2) day(-1) and LV 90 mg day(-1) in three divided daily doses for 14 days followed by a 1-week rest and i.v. irinotecan 250 mg m(-2) as a 90-min infusion every 3 weeks. Tumour responses, assessed every two cycles using RECIST criteria, were reviewed by an independent review committee. In 52 evaluable patients, the best overall response rate was 33% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 20-47%; 1 complete and 16 partial responses). The median time to progression was 5.4 months (95% CI 3.02-7.52 months) and median overall survival was 14.9 months (11.73-17.97 months). A total of 307 cycles were administered, with a median number of five cycles per patient (range: 1-10). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (25% of patients), diarrhoea (22%), vomiting (11%) and anaemia (11%). The TEGAFIRI regimen is a feasible, well-tolerated and convenient treatment option for patients with non-resectable mCRC.     

A phase I study of UFT/leucovorin, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in combination with external beam radiation therapy for advanced esophageal carcinoma

PURPOSE: Concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT) are used to treat patients with esophageal cancer. The optimal combination of chemotherapeutic agents with RT is not well established. We evaluated the safety and preliminary efficacy of a combination of UFT/leucovorin, carboplatin, and paclitaxel with RT in a Phase I study of patients with advanced esophageal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus initially received UFT/leucovorin, carboplatin, and paclitaxel with RT (1.8 Gy daily to 45 Gy). After completion, the disease was restaged and patients were evaluated for surgery. Primary end points included determination of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and a recommended Phase II dose. Secondary objectives included determination of non-DLTs, as well as preliminary radiographic and pathologic response rates. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled (11 men, 1 woman). All were assessable for toxicity and efficacy. One of 6 patients at Dose Level 1 (UFT/leucovorin, 200/30 mg twice daily on RT days; carboplatin, area under the curve [AUC] 5, Weeks 1 and 4; paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2 Weeks 1 and 4) had a DLT (febrile neutropenia). Of these 6 patients, 4 underwent esophagectomy and none achieved a pathologic complete response. Six patients were then enrolled at Dose Level 2 (UFT/leucovorin, 300/30 mg in the morning and 200/30 mg in the evening on RT days; carboplatin, AUC 5, Weeks 1 and 4; paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2 Weeks 1 and 4). Two of 6 patients at Dose Level 2 developed DLTs (febrile neutropenia in both). Esophagectomy was performed in 3 patients, with 2 achieving a pathologic complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Maximum tolerated doses in this study were UFT/leucovorin, 200/30 mg twice daily on RT days; carboplatin, AUC 5, Weeks 1 and 4; and paclitaxel, 175 mg/m2 Weeks 1 and 4 when delivered with external RT. In this small study, this regimen appears active, but toxic.     

Uracil-tegafur/leucovorin and mitomycin C salvage therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II study

Abstract

We investigated the efficacy and safety of oral Uracil/tegafur (UFT) with leucovorin and mitomycin C (MMC) as third-line treatment for patients with extensively pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This was a multicenter, prospective phase II study. Patients received MMC 7 mg/m² on day 1 and UFT 300 mg/m² with leucovorin 90 mg, both divided into three daily doses, on days 1–28 every 5 weeks. All patients had failed prior treatment with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine, bevacizumab, and cetuximab. The primary endpoint was tumor control rate evaluated after 2 cycles. Twenty-one patients were included: median age was 66 years (41·1–87·8 years). Tumor control rate was observed in 26·7% of the 15 patients evaluable for response. Median overall survival was 6·4 months. Grade 3 adverse events were asthenia, anorexia, and vomiting. In patients with mCRC who have progressed after as many as two prior therapies, the combination of UFT/leucovorin and MMC is safe and may produce a short stabilization of disease in approximately 25% of patients.     

Feasibility of a novel weekday-on/weekend-off oral UFT schedule as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer

Purpose: When oral anticancer agents are used for adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer, compliance and feasibility become issues because of the long treatment time. Appropriate studies of these issues are lacking. We investigated compliance and feasibility during a weekday-on/weekend-off schedule of oral UFT (uracil-tegafur) over a period of 1 year administered as adjuvant chemotherapy to patients with colorectal cancer. Patients and methods: A UFT dose of 600 mg/day was prescribed according to a weekday-on/weekend-off schedule to 87 patients after potentially curative resection. Compliance was investigated in three ways: physician interview, patient self-report, and chemical analysis of urine. The results were compared with the dose prescribed. Feasibility was evaluated on the basis of two indices: relative performance (RP), which was the ratio of the actual total dose taken to the total dose planned, and individual dose intensity (IDI), which was the ratio of the actual dose taken to the dose planned during a given period. Results: The compliance assessed by physician interview and by patient self-report conformed well with the prescribed dose, the rate of agreement among the three compliance measures being more than 94%. Chemical analysis of urine in 38 of the patients revealed that they were actually taking the drug. The RP was 0.72, and the IDI was 0.8. Conclusion: From these results, the feasibility of the weekday-on/weekend-off schedule was judged to be good. It is suggested that the feasibility would be even better if the dose of UFT was set according to body surface area. Received: 10 November 1999 / Accepted: 5 April 2000     

Phase II study of UFT and oxaliplatin in first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, assessed as response rate, and toxicity of UFT (Tegafur-Uracil) in combination with oxaliplatin as first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). In all, 84 patients with recurrent or metastatic CRC with measurable disease were included. Treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 85 mg m(-2) in 120-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1 and 15; i.v. l,leucovorin (l,LV) 250 mg m(-2) given in 2 h on day 1, followed by oral UFT 390 mg m(-2) on days 1-14, and oral l,LV 7.5 mg/12 h on days 2-14. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. A total of 492 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered with a median of six per patient (range 1-12). There was one complete response (1%) and 28 partial responses (34%) for an overall response rate of 35% (95% confidence interval (CI): 24-46%). A total of 36 patients (44%) had stable disease, whereas 17 (21%) had a progression. The median time to progression was 7.3 months and the median overall survival was 16.8 months. A prescheduled preliminary analysis was performed after inclusion of 16 patients who detected a high gastrointestinal toxicity, which led to a reduction of the UFT dose to 300 mg m(-2). With this new dosage, grade 3-4 diarrhoea and grade 3-4 nausea/vomiting dropped to 21 and 14% of patients, respectively. Other grade 3-4 toxicities were stomatitis in one (1%), anaemia in three (5%), neutropenia in two (3%), thrombocytopenia in one(1%), fatigue in six (9%), peripheral sensory neuropathy in nine (14%) and laryngopharyngeal dysesthesia in two patients (2%). The combination of oxaliplatin and UFT-l,LV is an active, easy-to-administer regimen with moderate toxicity. Hence, this regimen is worthy of further investigation.     

A multicenter phase II study of a five-day regimen of oral 5-fluorouracil plus eniluracil with or without leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a five-day regimenof oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus eniluracil (776C85) in patients withmetastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients and methods:Seventy-five patients with metastatic CRCthat was previously untreated or refractory to 5-FU–leucovorin (LV) wereenrolled and divided into two strata based upon their treatment history.Twenty-four had not previously received chemotherapy or had received adjuvantchemotherapy that ended >6 months prior to enrollment on study (previouslyuntreated stratum). Fifty-one patients had disease refractory to intravenous(i.v.) 5-FU–LV (previously treated stratum). All patients received sevenconsecutive daily doses of eniluracil (20 mg/day) with once daily oral 5-FUgiven on days 2–6, repeated every four weeks. One-half of the patientsin each stratum also received 50 mg/day oral LV on days 2–6. The 5-FUdose was 25 mg/m² when administered without LV and 20mg/m² when administered with LV. Results:Partial response (PR) was noted in 2 of 12 patientsreceiving eniluracil–5-FU and in 3 of 12 patients receivingeniluracil–5-FU–LV in the previously untreated stratum. Noresponses were observed in the refractory disease stratum, however, 15patients (30%) demonstrated stable disease over 2–18+ courses oftherapy. Non-hematologic toxicities were mild; only 7% of patientsexperienced grade 3 diarrhea. Myelosuppression was frequent and dose limiting.Neutropenic sepsis was reported in 13.5% of patients. Conclusions:Eniluracil with 5-FU administered orally with orwithout LV on a five-day schedule is active and well tolerated when given asprimary therapy to patients with metastatic CRC.     

Adjuvant immunochemotherapy with oral Tegafur/Uracil plus PSK in patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled study

Intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin is the standard adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer. However, oral adjuvant chemotherapy is attractive because it has low toxicity and greater convenience. We investigated the benefits of oral protein-bound polysaccharide K (PSK) with tegafur/uracil (UFT) as an adjuvant in stage II and III colorectal cancer. Patients were assigned to groups that received either 3 g PSK plus 300 mg UFT, or 300 mg UFT alone orally each day for a 2-year period following intravenous mitomycin C. Of 207 registered patients, 205 with stage II (n=123) or III (n=82) were analysed. The 5-year disease-free survival was 73.0% (95% CI 65.6-80.4%) with PSK (n=137) and 58.8% (95% CI 47.1-70.5%) in the controls (n=68) (P=0.016). Polysaccharide K reduced the recurrence by 43.6% (95% CI 4.5-66.7%) and mortality by 40.2% (95% CI -12.5 to 68.3%). The 5-year survival was 81.8% (95% CI 75.3-88.2%) in the PSK group and 72.1% (95% CI 61.4-82.7%) in the control group (P=0.056). In stage III patients, disease-free and overall survivals in patients receiving PSK were increased significantly: 60.0% (95% CI 47.1-72.9%) and 74.6% (95% CI 63.0-86.1%) in the PSK group as compared with 32.1% (95% CI 14.8-49.4%) and 46.4% (95% CI 28.0-64.9%) in the controls (P=0.002 and 0.003, respectively). Polysaccharide K prevented recurrence, particularly lung metastases (P=0.02; odds ratio 0.27; 95% CI 0.09-0.77). In the models, the presence of regional metastases (relative risk, 2.973; 95% CI 1.712-5.165; P<0.001), omission of PSK (relative risk, 2.106; 95% CI 1.221-3.633; P=0.007), and higher primary tumour (relative risk, 4.398; 95% CI 1.017-19.014; P=0.047) were each significant indicators of recurrence. Adverse effects were mild and compliance was good. Oral PSK with UFT reduced recurrence in stage II and III colorectal cancer, and increased survival in stage III.     

An open, multi-centre, phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel, UFT, and leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer

The aim of the study was to evaluate the response rate and safety of weekly paclitaxel (Taxol((R))) combination chemotherapy with UFT (tegafur, an oral 5-fluorouracil prodrug, and uracil at a 1 : 4 molar ratio) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients with histologically confirmed, locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic gastric cancer were studied. Paclitaxel 1-h infusion at a dose of 100 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 8 and oral UFT 300 mg m(-2) day(-1) plus LV 90 mg day(-1) were given starting from day 1 for 14 days, followed by a 7-day period without treatment. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. From February 2003 to October 2004, 55 patients were enrolled. The median age was 62 years (range: 32-82). Among the 48 patients evaluated for tumour response, two achieved a complete response and 22 a partial response, with an overall response rate of 50% (95% confidence interval: 35-65%). All 55 patients were evaluated for survival and toxicities. Median time to progression and overall survival were 4.4 and 9.8 months, respectively. Major grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia in 25 patients (45%) and diarrhoea in eight patients (15%). Although treatment was discontinued owing to treatment-related toxicities in nine patients (16%), there was no treatment-related mortality. Weekly paclitaxel plus oral UFT/LV is effective, convenient, and well tolerated in treating patients with advanced gastric cancer.     

UFT and oral leucovorin as radiation sensitizers in rectal and other gastrointestinal malignancies

UFT is the combination of the fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug tegafur, and the dihydrophyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitor uracil. UFT and leucovorin have been used in the oral treatment of a variety of malignancies. Given the radiosensitizing properties of UFT, its combination with radiation therapy is a logical step in the development of novel strategies for the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. Several phase I and phase II studies, described in this review, have attempted to substitute UFT for 5-FU in chemoradiation strategies for the treatment of patients with esophageal, pancreatic and rectal cancer. The results thus far suggest that this approach has acceptable toxicity and promising efficacy. Given the availability of the novel oral fluorinated pyrimidines and their efficacy in metastatic diseases, it remains to be determined whether 5-FU will eventually be substituted by oral fluorinated pyrimidines in the adjuvant and chemoradiation settings.     

A phase I/II study of oral uracil/tegafur (UFT), leucovorin and irinotecan in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile and response rate of the oral 5-fluorouracil prodrug UFT (tegafur/uracil) and leucovorin (LV) in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven advanced or metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma received first-line chemotherapy comprising UFT 250 mg/m(2)/day and LV 90 mg/day given on days 1 to 14, with escalating doses of irinotecan (200-300 mg/m(2)) administered intravenously on day 1 of a three-weekly cycle. Eligibility criteria were standard. The MTD was defined as the dose at which >33% of six patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during cycle 1. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were studied. Initially, six patients were treated at each of the irinotecan dose levels (200, 250 and 300 mg/m(2)) combined with UFT 250 mg/m(2)/day and LV 90 mg/day. DLTs consisting of grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea and febrile neutropenia were observed in one of 20 patients at 250 mg/m(2) and three of six patients at the 300 mg/m(2) irinotecan dose level. Having defined the MTD, the 250 mg/m(2) dose level was established as the recommended dose (RD) and expanded to 20 patients in whom treatment was generally well tolerated. The overall response rate was 19%, with five patients having a partial response (PR) and 18 stable disease (SD) out of 32 response-evaluable patients. CONCLUSION: UFT and LV can be safely combined with irinotecan. The RDs for future studies are UFT 250 mg/m(2)/day and LV 90 mg/day given on days 1-14, with irinotecan 250 mg/m(2) administered on day 1, every 3 weeks. This combination is well tolerated and active. Further investigation of UFT and LV in combination with irinotecan is warranted in patients with colorectal cancer.