Impact of the recommendations of the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group on pacemaker prescription and on the immediate costs of pacing in the Northern Region

Background—The report from the Working Party of the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group recommends the use of more sophisticated pacemakers in most patients. These proposals were initially circulated in September 1990 and are likely to have major cost implications. Their impact on pacing practice and the immediate costs of pacemaker hardware in the Northern Region were retrospectively audited.     

Conduction system pacing in France in 2022: A snapshot survey from the Working Group of Pacing and Electrophysiology of the French Society of Cardiology

BackgroundConduction system pacing (CSP) is an emerging and promising approach for physiological ventricular pacing. While data from randomized controlled trials are scarce, use of His-bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has increased in France.AimTo perform a national snapshot survey for cardiac electrophysiologists to evaluate adoption of CSP in France.MethodsAn online survey, distributed to every senior cardiac electrophysiologist in France, was conducted in November 2022.ResultsA total of 120 electrophysiologists completed the survey. Eighty-three (69%) respondents reported experience in undertaking CSP procedures and 27 (23%) were planning to start performing CSP in the coming 2 years. The implantation techniques and criteria used for successful implantation differed significantly among operators. The most frequent indications for HBP and LBBAP were high-degree atrioventricular block with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% (24 and 82%, respectively) or with LVEF ≥ 40% (27 and 74%, respectively), and after failure of a coronary sinus left ventricular lead (27 and 71%, respectively). The limitations respondents most frequently perceived when performing HBP were bad sensing/pacing parameters (45%), increased procedure duration (41%) and risk of lead dislodgement (30%). The most frequently perceived limitations to performing LBBAP were absence of guidelines or consensus (31%), lack of medical training (23%) and increased procedure duration (23%).ConclusionsOur national survey-based study supports wide adoption of CSP in France. CSP is currently used as a second-line approach for both antibradycardia and resynchronization indications, with important variations regarding implantation techniques and criteria for measuring success.     

Placebo effect of pacemaker implantation in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. PIC Study Group. Pacing In Cardiomyopathy

This study evaluated a possible placebo effect by pacemaker implantation. The study design was a 3-month multicenter, double-blind, randomized cross-over study to compare the effects of atrioventricular (AV) synchronous pacing with an optimal AV delay to inactive pacing in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC). Quality of life and left ventricular (LV) outflow tract obstruction were evaluated after the first study period in 40 patients assigned to inactive pacing. Data were compared with the corresponding results among the 41 subjects assigned to a first study period of active pacing. During inactive pacing, there was a significant improvement in perceived chest pain, dyspnea, and palpitations. Moreover, LV outflow tract gradient decreased from 71 +/- 32 mm Hg to 52 +/- 34 mm Hg (p = 0.04). In patients assigned to active pacing the reduction of the gradient was significantly more pronounced (70 +/- 24 mm Hg to 33 +/- 27 mm Hg; p <0.0001). The difference in gradient reduction between the groups was highly significant (p <0.00001). In the group assigned to active pacing there was also significant improvement in perceived symptoms as well as in alertness, the ability to be self-autonomous, and strenuous physical exercise. The improvements in the latter were significantly greater in those paced actively compared with patients paced inactively, whereas the changes in perceived symptoms did not differ between groups. In conclusion, pacemaker implantation had a placebo effect on objective and subjective parameters in this group of patients with obstructive HC.     

中华医学会心电生理和起搏分会第六届学术双年会会议纪要(心脏起搏部分)

在中华医学会心电生理和起搏分会第6届学术双年会暨成立10周年庆典大会上，来自全国各地的1200余名专家学者针对心脏起搏专题进行了热烈讨论。     

Guidelines for pacemaker follow-up in Canada: a consensus statement of the Canadian Working Group on Cardiac Pacing

A survey on Canadian pacing practices conducted in 1997 revealed a widespread desire for national guidelines on pacemaker follow-up. The present guidelines for pacemaker follow-up are a consensus statement of the Canadian Working Group on Cardiac Pacing. Direct patient follow-up rather than transtelephonic monitoring is desirable. Patients should be assessed at a minimum of within 72 h of implantation, at two to 12 weeks and at six months following implantation, and annually thereafter. More frequent assessments may be required for some patients. This depends on associated cardiovascular problems and specific devices. A typical follow-up visit should include a targeted cardiovascular assessment, interrogation of the pacing system, review of telemetered data, assessment of the underlying rhythm, assessment of pacing and sensing thresholds, and appropriate reprogramming of pacing parameters to optimize device function and longevity.