Long-term outcome of esophageal myotomy for achalasia

AIM:Modified Heller‘s myotomy is still the first choice for achalasia and the assessment of surgical outcomes is usually made based on the subjective sensation of patients.This study was to objectively assess the long-term outcomes of esophageal myotomy for achalasia using esophageal manometry, 24-hour pH monitoring,esophageal scintigraphy and fiberoptic esophagoscopy.METHODS:From February 1979 to October 2000, 176 patients with achalasia underwent modified Heller‘s myotomy, including esophageal myotomy alone in 146 patients, myotomy in combination with Gallone or Dor antirefiux procedure in 22 and 8 patients, respectively. Clinical score,pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES),esophageal clearance rate and gastroesophageal reflux were determined before and i to 22 years after surgery.RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 14 years, 84.5% of patients had a good or excellent relief of symptoms,and clinical scores as well as resting pressures of the esophageal body and LES were reduced compared with preoperative values (P<0.001).However,there was no significant difference in DeMeester score between pre-and postoperative patients(P=0.51).Esophageal transit was improved in postoperative patients, but still slower than that in normal controls. The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux in patients who underwent esophageal myotomy alone was 63.6% compared to 27.3% in those who underwent myotomy and antirefiux procedure (P=-0.087). Three (1.7%) patients were complicated with esophageal cancer after surgery.CONCLUSION: Esophageal myotomy for achalasia can reduce the resting pressures of the esophageal body and LES and improve esophageal transit and dysphagia. Myotomy in combination with antireflux procedure can prevent gastroesophageal reflux to a certain extent,but further randomized studies should be carried out to demonstrate its efficacy.     

Barrett's Esophagus after Cardiomyotomy for Esophageal Achalasia

Heller's myotomy for esophageal achalasia was performed on 64 patients in the 24 yr up to 1988. After follow-up averaging 13 yr, 46 patients were reexamined with endoscopy, biopsy, and manometry. Barrett's metaplasia of the distal esophagus was found in four patients 6, 13, 20, and 23 yr after the myotomy. These four also underwent ambulatory 24-h pH monitoring. They had the lowest distal esophageal sphincter pressures (1–5 mm Hg), and all four had symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux and pathologic pH values (<4 in the distal esophagus for 32–62% of the total recording time). Because of heightened risk for the development of Barrett's metaplasia following cardiomotomy for esophageal achalasia, with increased liability to carcinoma of the esophagus, regular endoscopic surveillance of these patients is advisable.     

Role of stationary esophageal manometry in clinical practice. Manometric results in patients with gastroesophageal reflux, dysphagia or non-cardiac chest pain.

The present study was carried out to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of stationary esophageal manometry in 263 patients divided into three groups: 150 patients with reflux symptoms, 68 with dysphagia, and 45 with non-cardiac chest pain. Patients with endoscopic abnormalities were excluded. Standard manometry was performed following the station pull-through technique. In the group of patients with reflux symptoms 40.7% had a normal manometry and 57.3% had abnormalities, being the most frequent (43%) hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter. In the dysphagia group, 20.6% of manometries were normal and 79.4% were abnormal, of which achalasia was the most frequent disorder (53.7%). In the case of non-cardiac chest pain, 42.2% of patients had a normal manometry and 57.8% an abnormal one, of which hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter was the most frequent abnormality. A significant higher proportion of manometric alterations were found in the dysphagia group compared to reflux symptoms and non-cardiac chest pain (p < 0.05). No statistical differences were found between the reflux and the non-cardiac chest pain groups. Manometry yields a higher diagnostic value in patients with dysphagia, and therefore manometry should be performed routinely after the exclusion of any organic esophageal disease. Manometry is not a first-choice functional diagnostic test in the study of patirnts with gastroesophageal reflux or non-cardiac chest pain.     

Treatment of idiopathic achalasia with per-oral esophageal myotomy

Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder that necessitates the disruption of the lower esophageal sphincter. Patients with achalasia should be evaluated in a systematic, multidisciplinary fashion. Workup should include upper endoscopy, esophagography, and high-resolution manometry. The gold standard for surgical treatment is laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial fundoplication. Per-oral esophageal myotomy is a novel endoscopic technique that has gained considerable traction over the past decade. The procedure includes the creation of a submucosal tunnel and a selective circular myotomy of the lower esophageal sphincter. Common intra-operative hazards include bleeding within the submucosal tunnel and capnoperitoneum. Significant complications are rare. Patients experience excellent dysphagia relief that is on par with laparoscopic Heller myotomy at moderate-term follow up. Post-operative gastroesophageal reflux disease occurs in greater than one-third of patients, and the vast majority of cases are readily controlled with an anti-secretory medication. Although data is sparse, there is a growing body of literature that supports the long-term durability of per-oral esophageal myotomy.     

Objective assessment of gastroesophageal reflux after extended Heller myotomy and total fundoplication for achalasia with the use of 24‐hour combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring (MII‐pH)

SUMMARY. This study aims to evaluate by the use of 24‐hour combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring (MII‐pH) the efficacy of the Nissen fundoplication in controlling both acid and nonacid gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in patients that underwent Heller myotomy for achalasia. It has been demonstrated that fundoplication prevents the pathologic acid GER after Heller myotomy, but no objective data exists on the efficacy of this antireflux surgery in controlling all types of reflux events. The study population consisted of 20 patients that underwent laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Nissen fundoplication for achalasia. All patients were investigated with manometry and MII‐pH. MII‐pH showed no evidence of postoperative pathologic GER. The overall number of GER episodes was normal in both the upright and recumbent position. This reduction was obtained because of the postoperative control of both the acid and nonacid reflux episodes. The Nissen fundoplication adequately controls both acid and nonacid GER after extended Heller myotomy. Further controls with MII‐pH are warranted to check at a longer follow‐up for the efficacy of this antireflux procedure in achalasic patients.     

Does combined multichannel intraluminal esophageal impedance and manometry predict postoperative dysphagia after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication?

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease; however, some patients develop dysphagia postoperatively. Manometry is used to evaluate disorders of peristalsis, but has not been proven useful to identify which patients may be at risk for postoperative dysphagia. Multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) evaluates the effective clearance of a swallowed bolus through the esophagus. We hypothesized that MII combined with manometry may detect those patients most at risk of developing dysphagia after LNF. Between March 2003 and January 2007, 74 patients who agreed to participate in this study were prospectively enrolled. All patients completed a preoperative symptom questionnaire, MII/manometry, and 24‐h pH monitoring. All patients underwent LNF. Symptom questionnaires were administered postoperatively at a median of 18 months (range: 6–46 months), and we defined dysphagia (both preoperatively and postoperatively) as occurring more than once a month with a severity ≥4 (0–10 Symptom Severity Index). Thirty‐two patients (43%) reported preoperative dysphagia, but there was no significant difference in pH monitoring, lower esophageal sphincter pressure/relaxation, peristalsis, liquid or viscous bolus transit (MII), or bolus transit time (MII) between patients with and without preoperative dysphagia. In those patients reporting preoperative dysphagia, the severity of dysphagia improved significantly from 6.8 ± 2 to 2.6 ± 3.4 (P < 0.001) after LNF. Thirteen (17%) patients reported dysphagia postoperatively, 10 of whom (75%) reported some degree of preoperative dysphagia. The presence of postoperative dysphagia was significantly more common in patients with preoperative dysphagia (P= 0.01). Patients with postoperative dysphagia had similar lower esophageal sphincter pressure and relaxation, peristalsis, and esophageal clearance to those without dysphagia. Neither MII nor manometry predicts dysphagia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease or its occurrence after LNF. The presence of dysphagia preoperatively is the only predictor of dysphagia after LNF.     

Long-term effects of myotomy and partial fundoplication for esophageal achalasia.

Controversy persists in the surgical approach to treat esophageal achalasia. This investigation reports the long-term effects of esophageal myotomy and partial fundoplication in treating this disorder. From 1984 to 1998, 32 patients with achalasia underwent myotomy and partial fundoplication (Belsey Mark IV) using a left thoracotomy. The median follow up is 7.2 years. Assessments include clinical evaluation, esophagogram, radionuclide transit, manometry, 24-h pH, and endoscopy. There is no complication and no mortality. Preoperative assessment was compared with that in 0-3, 3-7, and 7-16 postoperative years. Clinically, the prevalence of dysphagia was decreased from 100% to 6%, 12%, and 13%, respectively (P < 0.001). Heartburn remains unchanged (P > 0.25). On radiology, the prevalence of barium stasis was decreased from 97% to 44%, 48%, and 47%, respectively (P=0.001), whereas a pseudo-diverticulum was observed in two-thirds of patients after operation (P=0.001). Percent radionuclide stasis at 2 min was measured as 70%, 17%, 20%, and 20%, respectively (P=0.001). Manometrically, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) gradient was decreased from 29 to 10, 9, and 9 mmHg, respectively (P=0.001). LES relaxation was improved from 41% preoperatively to 100% postoperatively at each postoperative period (P < 0.001). An abnormal acid exposure was observed in four patients after the operation. Endoscopy documented mucosal damage in three patients (P > 0.25). In conclusion, on long-term follow up, myotomy and partial fundoplication for achalasia relieve obstructive symptoms and improve esophageal emptying, and reduce LES gradient and improve LES relaxation. Acid reflux is recorded in 13% of patients and esophageal mucosal damage is identified in 11% of the patient population. A longer myotomy not covered by the fundoplication results in pseudodiverticulum formation and increased esophageal retention.     

The Preoperative Evaluation of Patients Considered for Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery

Few studies address the proper extent of the preoperative testing in patients referred fur consideration of antireflux surgery. Our aim was to perform a thorough gastroesophageal evaluation and determine it's influence on the therapeutic decisions of such patients. We evaluated 107 consecutive patients in a combined GI/Surgery clinic for severe or refractory gastroesophageal reflux. The patients had an EGD, esophageal manometry, and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pli monitoring. Only patients with gastric symptoms had gastric testing. Nineteen patients were excluded, 12 refused further evaluation and seven were felt to be unfit for antireflux surgery because of medical or psychological reasons. Eighty-eight patients completed the required studies. Fifty-four patients (61%) had typical reflux symptoms and erosive esophaghis on EGD. All these patients had an abnormal pH study. Five of the 34 patients without esophagitis had a normal pH study and did not have surgery. Ten patients had poor peristalsis by esophageal manometry prompting a subtotal fundoplication. One patient had severe delayed gastric emptying, requiring pyloroplasty in addition to the fundoplication. Eighty of 83 patients had good or excellent surgical results. EGD and esophageal manometry are indispensable in the preoperativc evaluation. Manometry may identify abnormalities altering surgical decisions in roughly 10% of patients. Routine ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is of marginal benefit, except in patients without esophagitis or in those patients where the diagnosis is in doubt. Clinically significant gastric abnormalities are rare, and routine testing of gastric function is not indicated.     

Achalasie – welche Heilungsmethode soll für ?ltere Patienten gew?hlt werden?

Background Achalasia is an uncommon illness affecting 1 per 100,000 patients a year. It encompasses a rare, primary motor disorder of the distal esophagus. Methods Over the period 1998-2006, 115 patients underwent various treatments for achalasia; the subgroup of seniors consisted of 26 patients. Six patients of these (age 69.7 y) underwent a modified Heller cardiomyotomy due to failure of previous endoscopic interventions. Standard esophageal manometry and 24 hour pH metry were performed pre- and postoperatively. Results Six senior patients with achalasia underwent a laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Average preoperative tonus of the LES was 55 mmHg, postoperative tonus of the LES decreased to 11 mmHg. We performed Toupet partial fundoplication in all patients; no microperforation of the esophagus was found in the preoperative esophagoscopy. We recorded minimal pathological gastroesophageal reflux in pH metry – the average preoperative DeMeester score was 8, postoperatively 10.5. Prolonged dysphagia was not present in any patient – preoperative GIQLI score was 94, postoperative score was 106. There was no mortality or morbidity in the group of the operated patients. Conclusion Our operational results and postoperative follow-up show that laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Toupet partial fundoplication is a safe and effective treatment and can be recommended as the method of first choice for senior patients with no contraindication for laparoscopic operation.     

The effect of laparoscopic partial fundoplication on dysphagia, esophageal and lower esophageal sphincter motility

It has been suggested that dysphagia is less common after partial versus complete fundoplication. The mechanisms contributing to postoperative dysphagia remain unclear. The objective of the present prospective study was to investigate esophageal motility and the prevalence of dysphagia in patients who have undergone laparoscopic partial fundoplication. Symptoms, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) characteristics and esophageal body motility were evaluated prospectively in 62 patients before and after laparoscopic partial fundoplication: 33 women and 29 men with a mean age of 44 +/- 1.5 years (range, 21-71). The patients filled in symptom questionnaires and underwent stationary and ambulatory manometry and 24-h pH-metry before and after operation. A small but significant increase in LES pressure from 14.8 +/- 0.9 to 17.8 +/- 0.8 mmHg was seen after laparoscopic partial fundoplication. Further, LES characteristics and esophageal body motility were not different post- versus preoperation. Three months after surgery, dysphagia was present in eight patients. No differences in LES characteristics or body motility were present between patients with and without dysphagia. Six months after the operation dysphagia was present in only three patients (3.2% mild and 1.6% severe dysphagia). Adequate reflux control was obtained in 85% of the patients. Laparoscopic partial fundoplication offers adequate reflux control without affecting esophageal body motility and with a very low incidence of postoperative dysphagia.     

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in asthma patients without reflux symptoms

Gastroesophageal reflux is a potential trigger of asthma that may be clinically silent. This study examines the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in asthma patients without reflux symptoms. This prospective cohort study evaluated 26 patients with stable asthma without reflux symptoms using esophageal manometry and 24-h esophageal pH testing. Gastroesophageal reflux was considered present if esophageal acid contact times were abnormal. Demographic variables were analyzed to determine if they predicted the presence of gastroesophageal reflux. Asthma patients with asymptomatic gastroesophageal reflux were compared with 30 age-matched asthma patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux. The prevalence of abnormal 24-h esophageal pH tests in asthma patients without reflux symptoms was 62% (16 of 26). Demographic variables did not predict abnormal 24-h esophageal pH tests in asthma patients with asymptomatic gastroesophageal reflux. Asthma patients with asymptomatic gastroesophageal reflux had higher amounts of proximal esophageal acid exposure (p < 0.05) compared with asthma patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux. Because demographic variables do not predict abnormal 24-h esophageal pH tests in asthma patients without reflux symptoms, 24-h esophageal pH testing is required. This study suggests that gastroesophageal reflux is present in asthma patients, even in the absence of esophageal symptoms.     

Outcomes after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication are not influenced by the pattern of reflux

SUMMARY.  The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with different types of gastroesophageal reflux disease (upright, supine, or bipositional) after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and determine if patients with upright reflux have worse outcomes. Two hundred and twenty-five patients with reflux confirmed by 24-h pH monitoring were divided into three groups based on the type of reflux present. Patients were questioned pre- and post-fundoplication regarding the presence and duration of symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, cough and chest pain). Symptoms were scored using a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 4 (disabling symptom). Esophageal manometry and pH results were also compared. There was no statistically significant difference in lower esophageal sphincter length, pressure or function between the three groups. There was no significant difference in any of the postoperative symptom categories between the three groups. The type of reflux identified preoperatively does not have an adverse effect on postoperative outcomes after Nissen fundoplication and should not discourage physicians from offering antireflux surgery to patients with upright reflux.     

Heller''s esophagomyotomy with or without a 360° floppy Nissen fundoplication for achalasia. Long-term results from a prospective randomized study

Heller's esophagomyotomy relieves dysphagia but does not restore esophageal peristalsis. The myotomy may induce reflux and the addition of a 360 degrees fundoplication may be hazardous with regard to the remaining aperistaltic esophagus. The aim of this prospectively randomized clinical trial was to compare the outcome for patients with uncomplicated achalasia who underwent an anterior Heller's esophagomyotomy (H group) with or without an additional floppy Nissen fundoplication (H + N group). Between 1984 and 1995, 20 patients were prospectively randomized to one or other of the performed operations, 10 patients per group. Esophagitis including Barrett's esophagus (n = 2) was seen under medical treatment, in 6 of 9 in the H group but none in the H + N group. No patient in the H + N group required postoperative continuous acid-reducing drugs. Twenty-four-hour esophageal pH-studies in median 3.4 years after surgery showed pathological reflux expressed as a percentage of time below pH 4 of 13.1% in the H group compared to 0.15% (P < 0.001) in H + N group. One patient with recurrent dysphagia in the H + N group later had an esophagectomy. The remaining patients reported significant improvement of dysphagia without symptoms of reflux at 8.0 years follow-up. Heller's esophagomyotomy eliminates dysphagia, but can induce advanced reflux that requires medical treatment. The addition of a 360 degrees fundoplication eliminates reflux without adding dysphagia in the majority of patients and can be recommended for most patients with uncomplicated achalasia.     

非梗阻性食管源性吞咽困难患者食管测压结果分析

背景:食管源性吞咽困难的病因可分为机械性梗阻和动力障碍两类。目前关于致吞咽困难的食管动力障碍类型的研究相对较少。目的:分析非梗阻性食管源性吞咽困难患者的食管测压结果,探讨引起吞咽困难症状的常见食管动力障碍类型。方法:纳入2007年1月～2012年6月西安交通大学医学院第二附属医院50例以吞咽困难为主诉而行食管测压者,对其测压结果进行分析。入组患者通过病史询问、内镜或食管钡透检查等除外非食管源性和梗阻性吞咽困难。结果:36例(72.0%)患者的食管动力障碍类型为非特异性食管动力障碍(NEMD),13例(26.0%)为贲门失弛缓症,1例(2.0%)食管测压结果正常。9例(18.0%)合并胃食管反流病者均为NEMD。NEMD和贲门失弛缓症患者的食管动力障碍均以食管体部运动功能紊乱和下食管括约肌功能异常为主。结论:本组非梗阻性食管源性吞咽困难患者的食管动力障碍类型多为NEMD,其次为贲门失弛缓症。非梗阻性食管源性吞咽困难患者的食管测压结果可能正常。     

Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: variables related to a good response

Achalasia is a motor disorder characterized by esophageal aperistalsis and failure of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. The cardinal symptoms are dysphagia, food regurgitation and weight loss. The most effective treatments are pneumatic dilation (PD) of the cardia and Heller esophageal myotomy with partial fundoplication. There is still controversy regarding which treatments should be initially done. The aims of this study were to evaluate clinical response and the variables related to good results in both treatments. Ninety‐two patients with achalasia diagnosed by esophageal manometry were randomized to receive either PD or laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial fundoplication. After the procedure, patients were followed up clinically and submitted to esophageal manometry and pH monitoring. Three months after treatment, 73% of the patients from PD group and 84% of the surgery group had good results (P = 0.19). After 2 years of follow‐up, 54% of the PD group and 60% of the surgery group (P = not significant) were symptom free. Variables related to a good response to PD were a 50% drop in lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) or a LESP <10 mmHg after treatment. Patients over 40 years old with LESP ≤32 mmHg before treatment and a drop in LESP >50% after treatment significantly achieved better responses after surgical treatment when compared with PD. The reflux rate was significantly higher in the PD group (27.7%) compared with the surgery group (4.7%), P = 0.003. We concluded that surgical treatment and PD for achalasia are equally effective even after 2 years of follow‐up. The choice of treatment for achalasia should be based on the following parameters: treatment availability, rate of good results, complication rates, variables related to good responses and also the patient's wish.     

Esophageal body length, lower esophageal sphincter length, position and pressure in health and disease

We compared esophageal dimensions in control subjects and patients with differing motility disorders and severities of reflux disease. Patients (1108) and healthy controls (36) underwent manometry and 24-h pH monitoring. Subjects were grouped according to pH and manometry data into seven groups. Mean (s.e.m.) esophageal body length is greatest in achalasia [22.41 (0.27) cm] and least in reflux disease [20.06 (0.13) cm, p < 0.05]. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure is greatest in achalasia [17.46 (1.06) mmHg] and least in reflux disease [6.57 (0.24) mmHg, p < 0.05]. LES length is least in achalasia patients and control subjects. The ratio of intra-abdominal to intrathoracic LES is greatest in achalasia (1.29), no reflux and normal motility group, and controls and least in reflux disease (1.04, p < 0.05). In conclusion, esophageal body length is greatest in achalasia and least in reflux disease. This is associated with caudal movement of the LES in achalasia and cranial movement of the LES in reflux disease, relative to the diaphragm.     

The Pathogenesis and Management of Achalasia: Current Status and Future Directions

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder that is commonly misdiagnosed initially as gastroesophageal reflux disease. Patients with achalasia often complain of dysphagia with solids and liquids but may focus on regurgitation as the primary symptom, leading to initial misdiagnosis. Diagnostic tests for achalasia include esophageal motility testing, esophagogastroduodenoscopy and barium swallow. These tests play a complimentary role in establishing the diagnosis of suspected achalasia. High-resolution manometry has now identified three subtypes of achalasia, with therapeutic implications. Pneumatic dilation and surgical myotomy are the only definitive treatment options for patients with achalasia who can undergo surgery. Botulinum toxin injection into the lower esophageal sphincter should be reserved for those who cannot undergo definitive therapy. Close follow-up is paramount because many patients will have a recurrence of symptoms and require repeat treatment.     

Outcome of floppy Nissen fundoplication with intraoperative manometry to treat sliding hiatal hernia

SUMMARY.  The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of floppy Nissen fundoplication with intraoperative esophageal manometry. Between February 1992 and July 2004, there were 102 patients with sliding hiatal hernia undergoing transabdominal Nissen fundoplication. They were divided into three groups: 27 patients were in the Nissen group (CNF), 44 in the floppy Nissen group (FNF, including 5 with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication), and 31 in the intraoperative-esophageal-manometry group (INF, 13 with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication). There were no operation-related deaths. Operation-related complications occurred in five patients within 1 month after operation: In CNF, two patients suffered from dysphagia and one from regurgitation; in FNF, one patient had slight dysphagia and two had regurgitation; in INF, there was no one who complained about dysphagia or regurgitation, but pneumothorax occurred in one case. After more than 2 years of follow-up, two patients, in CNF, suffered from severe dysphagia, one recurred and two with abnormal 24 h pH monitoring. In FNF, one patient had dysphagia, one recurred and three had abnormal 24 h pH monitoring; in INF, two patients had acid reflux on 24 h pH monitoring. The postoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure was in the normal range in 30 of 31 patients (96.5%). The normal rate of postoperative tests in CNF, FNF and INF were 81.5%, 86.4% and 93.5%, respectively. Both the Nissen fundoplication and the floppy Nissen fundoplication are effective approaches to treat patients with sliding hiatal hernia. Intraoperative manometry is useful in standardizing the tightness of the wrap in floppy Nissen fundoplication and may contribute to reducing or avoiding the occurence of postoperative complications.     

Functional analysis of long‐term outcome after Heller's myotomy for achalasia

Treatment of achalasia aims at reducing the pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and palliate symptoms. Our objective in this study was to investigate functional changes of the esophagus after Heller myotomy and evaluate their influence on postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal morphologic changes. Between 1980 and 2003, 216 patients with achalasia underwent Heller myotomy, associated with anterior partial fundoplication (Dor fundoplication). Preoperative and long‐term outcome data were collected from these patients at our hospital. The objective was to analyze esophageal functional results after Heller myotomy in the long term. Results were classified as excellent, good, fair, or poor, according to Vantrappen and Hellemans’ modified classification. One‐year, 2‐year, 5‐year, 10‐year, and 20‐year postoperative follow‐up information was available in 100% of all patients, 91.7%, 85.1%, 60%, 52.6%, and 45.9%, respectively. There were no perioperative deaths. One year after the surgery, all patients had a significant reduction in symptoms of dysphagia and regurgitation. Five years, 10 years, 15 years, and 20 years after surgery, there were 77.2% of patients (142 in 184), 68.1%, 57.1%, and 54.5%, respectively, who were satisfied (excellent to good) with surgery. No esophageal peristalsis was demonstrated in patients during follow‐up. Contractile waves in the body of the esophagus were simultaneous. The difference in the distal esophageal amplitude, the LES relaxation rate, and LES pressures in the anterior wall and/ or two sides was significant (P < 0.05) when compared before and after operation. However, there was no significant difference in the LES length and LES pressure in the posterior side. The change of direction of the LES pressure and the relaxation of LES correlate with long‐term outcomes. Postoperative gastroesophageal reflux rates, including nocturnal reflux, increased with time. The percentage of patients whose esophageal diameter became normal or remained mildly increased with time in the first 10 years after surgery changed significantly. Myotomy is an effective way to palliate symptoms in patients with achalasia. Adequate myotomy can lead to reduction of LES pressure in two or three directions, which may facilitate esophageal emptying by gravity. Surgical intervention does not lead to the return of esophageal peristalsis. Functional damage of LES in patients with achalasia is irreversible.     

Effect of Pneumatic Dilation on Gastroesophageal Reflux in Achalasia

The aims of this study were to assess the effectof pneumatic dilation on gastroesophageal reflux inachalasia, differentiate esophageal acid due to lactatefrom acid due to gastroesophageal reflux, and determine if chest pain and heartburn arereliable indicators of gastroesophageal reflux. Eightuntreated achalasia patients underwent pre- andpostdilation esophageal fluid/food residue lactate andpH analysis, esophageal manometry, 24-hr pHmonitoring, and symptom assessment. All patients had asuccessful clinical outcome and a decrease in loweresophageal sphincter pressure from 29.1 ± 12.7 to14.7 ± 3.8 mm Hg (mean ± SD; P = 0.04). Abnormalacid exposure was present in two patients before and twopatients after dilation. Postdilation acid exposure wasmild. Lactate was detected before dilation in allpatients. A lactate concentration 2 mmol/liter wasassociated with acidic residue and one abnormal 24-hr pHprofile. There was no correlation between an abnormal24-hr pH test and age, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, or duration of symptoms prior totreatment. Chest pain and heartburn were unrelated todrops in pH. Gastroesophageal reflux is rare inuntreated achalasia and esophageal acidity may resultfrom ingestion of acidic foods or production oflactate. Mild gastroesophageal reflux occurs afterdilation but is of no clinical significance. Chest painand heartburn are not indicators of acid reflux inachalasia.