Genotyping of intron 22-related rearrangements of <Emphasis Type="Italic">F8</Emphasis> by inverse-shifting PCR in Egyptian hemophilia A patients

Hemophilia A (HA) is the most common severe bleeding disorder in humans, affecting one in 5,000 male births. In severe HA, intron 22 inversion of F8 is the most prevalent mutation, accounting for 40–50% of all mutations; however, little is known about the disease-causing mutations among Egyptian hemophiliacs. We aimed at genotyping all possible known DNA rearrangements of intron 22 of F8 in Egyptian HA patients. Peripheral blood samples were collected from 30 Egyptian HA patients (13 severe, ten moderate, and seven mild cases). Genotyping of F8 intron 22 rearrangements was performed by inverse-shifting PCR (IS-PCR). Our study revealed that seven patients (23.3%) had inversion 22, three patients (10%) had deletion 22, and 20 patients (66.7%) carried the wild-type allele. No intron 22 duplication was detected. The relative proportion of inversion 22-type 1 to inversion 22-type 2 was 85.7% and 14.3%, respectively, whereas the relative proportion of deletion 22-type 1 to deletion 22-type 2 was 33.3% and 66.7%, respectively. A statistically highly significant relation was found between disease severity and F8 intron 22 rearrangements (p = 0.008). Among severe cases, 46.1% had inversion 22, 23.1% had deletion 22, and 30.8% carried the wild-type allele. We conclude that F8 intron 22 inversion/deletion is responsible for about one third of disease-causing mutations among Egyptian hemophiliacs and for nearly 70% in severe cases. In addition, F8 intron 22 inversion/deletion by IS-PCR has proven to be a rapid and robust technique and might be the recommended tool for genetic analysis of HA patients specially with severe cases in developing countries.     

Profiling of factor VIII mutations in Korean haemophilia A

Summary.  Haemophilia A (HA) is an X chromosome-linked inherited bleeding disorder caused by heterogeneous mutations of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Although more than 900 mutations of FVIII gene are reported in the HAMSTeRS database, the mutation data regarding the FVIII gene in the Korean population is currently insufficient. The aim of this study was to profile the mutations of FVIII in Korean HA, 38 unrelated Korean HA male patients were examined. Peripheral blood samples were obtained from the patients. Long distance-PCR was performed for the identification of inversions in intron 22 and intron 1. Then gross exon deletion was examined to the inversion-negative patients by multiplex-PCR. Finally, direct sequencing was performed on exons 1–26, 5'- and 3'-UTR. We identified 33 mutations from the 38 patients. These included 15 inversions in intron 22 (39.5%), one inversion in intron 1 (2.6%), one gross exon deletion (2.6%), five deletions (13.2%), two insertions (5.3%), six missense (15.8%) and three nonsense mutations (7.9%). Mutation types for five patients (13.2%) were not identified in this study. We determined that the most common defect in FVIII in this study was an inversion mutation in intron 22; this is consistent with the findings of other studies. For the first time in Korean HA, a patient with intron 1 inversion was found. In addition, we report eight novel mutation types which never been reported in HAMSTeRS database. The mutation data in this study should prove useful as a reference for the diagnosis of HA and the detection of carriers in the Korean population.     

Identification of factor VIII gene mutations in patients with severe haemophilia A in Venezuela: identification of seven novel mutations

Summary. Haemophilia A is caused by mutations in the gene encoding coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). In severe Haemophilia A (sHA), two inversions are responsible for approximately 50% of the genetic alterations (intron 22 and intron 1 inversions). The other mutations are extremely diverse and each affected family generally has its own mutation. Our aim was to detect the genetic alterations present in the FVIII gene (F8) in 54 unrelated male patients with sHA in Venezuela. We initially detected the presence of the intron 22 inversion by performing inverse PCR, and the negative patients for this inversion were analysed for the intron 1 inversion by PCR. Patients negative for both inversions were analysed using Conformation Sensitive Gel Electrophoresis for mutations in all exons, promoter region and 3′‐UTR. sHA causative mutations were identified in 49 patients. Intron‐22 and ‐1 inversions were detected in 41% and 0% of patients respectively. Besides these two mutations, 25 different mutations were identified, including nine nonsense, four small deletions, two small insertions, four missense, three splicing mutations and three large deletions. Seven novel mutations were identified, including two nonsense mutations, two small deletions, one small insertion, one missense mutation and one splicing mutation. Thirty one percent of the patients with identified mutations developed inhibitors against exogenous FVIII. This is the first report of F8 mutations in patients with sHA in Venezuela; the data from this study suggests that the spectrum of gene defects found in these patients is as heterogeneous as reported previously for other populations.     

Factor 8 (F8) gene mutation profile of Turkish hemophilia A patients with inhibitors.

Factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy is ineffective in hemophilia A patients who develop alloantibodies (inhibitors) against FVIII. The type of factor 8 (F8) gene mutation, genes in the major histocompatibility complex loci, and also polymorphisms in IL-10 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha are the major predisposing factors for inhibitor formation. The present study was initiated to reveal the F8 gene mutation profile of 30 severely affected high-responder patients with inhibitor levels of more than 5 Bethesda U (BU)/ml and four low-responder patients with inhibitors less than 5 BU/ml. Southern blot and PCR analysis were performed to detect intron 22 and intron 1 inversions, respectively. Point mutations were screened by DNA sequence analysis of all coding regions, intron/exon boundaries, promoter and 3' UTR regions of the F8 gene. The prevalent mutation was the intron 22 inversion among the high-responder patients followed by large deletions, small deletions, and nonsense mutations. Only one missense and one splicing error mutation was seen. Among the low-responder patients, three single nucleotide deletions and one intron 22 inversion were found. All mutation types detected were in agreement with the severe hemophilia A phenotype, most likely leading to a deficiency of and predisposition to the development of alloantibodies against FVIII. It is seen that Turkish hemophilia A patients with major molecular defects have a higher possibility of developing inhibitors.     

Identification of factor VIII gene mutations in 101 patients with haemophilia A: mutation analysis by inversion screening and multiplex PCR and CSGE and molecular modelling of 10 novel missense substitutions

Haemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked bleeding disorder caused by diverse mutations in the human coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) gene. We have analysed DNA from 109 unrelated Indian patients with HA for their FVIII gene defects. Among these patients 89 (82%) had severe (FVIII:C <1%) HA, 11 (10%) had moderate (FVIII:C 1-5%) HA and nine (8%) had mild (FVIII:C 5-30%) HA. These patients were first screened for the common intron 22 and intron 1 inversions. Inversion negative samples were screened for point mutations by a multiplex PCR and conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis strategy. Mutations were identified in 101 of the 109 patients. These included two (2%) intron 1 and 51 (51%) intron 22 inversions, four (4%) gross deletions and 44 (43%) point mutations. Twenty-nine novel causative mutations, including 11 missense, seven frameshift, five nonsense mutations, three splice site defects and three gross deletions were detected. Ten of the novel missense mutations were studied by molecular modelling. Two different (Thr2253Pro and Pro1392fs) mutations were seen in four unrelated families and FVIII gene haplotyping suggested a common founder effect. Seven of these 109 patients had inhibitors. Among them, four had intron 22 inversions, one had a novel gross deletion (delexon 2-9) and one a nonsense mutation (Trp1535Stop). In one of these patients, no mutation could be identified in the FVIII gene. A Thr2253Pro novel mutation and an intron 22 inversion were identified in two female haemophiliacs. The data from this study suggests that the spectrum of gene defects in Indian patients with HA is as heterogeneous as reported in other populations.     

Mutation analysis of factor VIII in Korean patients with severe hemophilia A

Hemophilia A is an X-linked recessive disorder caused by mutations of the factor VIII gene. The mutation spectrum has been reported in various populations, but not in Koreans. Mutation analysis of the factor VIII gene was performed in 22 unrelated Korean patients with severe hemophilia A. We extracted genomic DNA from their blood, and assessed intron inversions, deletions, and point mutations by direct DNA sequencing. A multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification gene dosage assay was also performed to identify exon deletions. Disease-causing mutations were identified in all patients, of which four cases were previously unreported. Seven intron 22 inversions, nine point mutations (6 nonsense mutations and 3 missense mutations), and four small rearrangements were identified. One multi-exon deletion and one 5′-donor splicing site mutation were also observed. Four novel mutations (one small deletion, one multiple exon deletion, one missense, and one splice site mutation) were detected, and point mutations were predominant (40.9%), followed by intron 22 inversions (31.8%). Further studies are required in order to establish a solid conclusion regarding the prevalence of various mutations in the Korean population.     

Factor VIII gene mutations profile in 148 Chinese hemophilia A subjects

Background: Hemophilia A (HA) is a common X‐linked recessive bleeding disease caused by mutations in FVIII gene. The identification of mutation in HA subjects can lead to more accurate diagnosis and contribute to the genetic counseling/prenatal diagnosis. Objectives: Our objective is to identify the FVIII defects in 148 unrelated Chinese HA subjects and to analyze the potential consequence of novel mutations. Methods: FVIII: C was assayed using one‐stage method, and FVIII inhibitor was tested using Bethesda method. Intron 22 and 1 inversions were identified by PCR technique. Non‐inversion mutations of FVIII gene were identified by direct sequencing. Novel mutations were further analyzed based on a B‐domain deleted FVIII crystallographic structure and bioinformatics tools. Results: The intron 22 and 1 inversions affected 57 and three severe subjects, respectively. Sixty‐seven different mutations were identified in non‐inversion subjects including 35 novel mutations that were not reported previously. Novel mutations include five nonsense mutations, 15 missense mutations, three insertions, eight small deletions, two splice site mutations and two partial gene deletions. The potential deleterious effects of these novel missense mutations include disruption of the protein core, impairment of inter‐domain interaction and FVIII binding with other proteins. Conclusion: Similar to other races, intron 22 and one inversions are also recurrent mutation in severe HA subjects monitored in our centre. Sixty‐seven mutations (52% novel reported) among 88 non‐inversion subjects represent the high degree of heterogeneity of FVIII gene mutations causing HA. Characteristic of HA FVIII gene mutations extend our insight into structure–function relationship of the FVIII molecule.     

Factor VIII mutations in 42 Moldovan haemophilia A families, including 12 that are novel

Summary.  Haemophilia A (HA) is a bleeding disorder caused by mutations within the X-linked F8 gene. A series of 42 unrelated Moldovan patients with HA had their disease-causative mutation determined to provide clinically valuable genotyping information for a historically underserved population and to utilize factor VIII (FVIII) structural information to analyse the effects of haemophilic missense substitutions. DNA samples were analysed to detect intron 22 and intron 1 inversions followed by heteroduplex analysis of PCR-amplified fragments containing all exonic sequences. Missense sites identified by DNA sequencing were visualized in the recently described crystal structures of human FVIII. Of the 26 different point mutations, 12 were novel. Gel electrophoresis identified samples with a second major DNA band that migrated abnormally; these amplified products were sequenced. Thirteen intron 22 inversions and one intron 1 inversion were found. Two patients had large, partial gene deletions and there were six frameshift, two non-sense, two splicing and 16 missense genotypes. Two subjects with an intron 22 inversion and one with a large, partial gene deletion developed an alloimmune inhibitor. Their localization suggests intra- and possibly inter-molecular interactions that are important for the structural integrity and/or procoagulant function of FVIII.     

Computational and molecular approaches for predicting unreported causal missense mutations in Belgian patients with haemophilia A

Haemophilia A (HA) is caused by widespread mutations in the factor VIII gene. The high spontaneous mutation rate of this gene means that roughly 40% of HA mutations are private. This study aimed to describe the approaches used to confirm private disease-causing mutations in a cohort of Belgian HA patients. We studied 148 unrelated HA families for the presence of intron 22 and intron 1 inversion by Southern blotting and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay was used to detect large genomic rearrangements. Detection of point mutations was performed by DNA sequencing. Predicting the causal impact of new non-synonymous changes was studied by two general strategies: (i) molecular approaches such as family cosegregation, evaluation of the implicated codon based on phylogenic separated species and absence of the mutation in the general Belgian population, and (ii) bioinformatics approaches to analyse the potential functional consequences of missense mutations. Among the 148 HA patients, in addition to common intron 22 and intron 1 inversions as well as large deletions or duplications, 67 different point mutations were identified, of which 42 had been reported in the HAMSTeRS database, and 25 were novel including 10 null variants for which RNA analyses confirmed the causal effect of mutations located in a splice site consensus and 15 missense mutations whose causality was demonstrated by molecular approaches and bioinformatics. This article reports several strategies to evaluate the deleterious consequences of unreported F8 substitutions in a large cohort of HA patients.     

F8 gene mutation profile and ITT response in a cohort of Italian haemophilia A patients with inhibitors

Anti factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies represent the main complication of replacement therapy in severe cases of haemophilia and most patients with inhibitor have gross gene rearrangements or point mutations that hamper the production of normal circulating FVIII. In this study we have investigated 82 haemophilia A patients with inhibitors. Seventy six were severe, three were moderate and three were mild. We screened the patients for the causative mutations using long range PCR for the recurrent intron 22 inversion (invint22), multiplex PCR for intron 1 inversion (invint1) and conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis followed by DNA sequencing for all other mutation types in the F8 gene. Diverse genetic defects were detected in the severe cases (with a predominance of severe molecular defects): F8 gene inversions, large deletions and non-sense mutations account for 71% of the mutations. Only missense and splicing mutations were identified in the non-severe patients and we confirmed that the presence of inhibitors correlates well with the presence of severe mutations, but a proportion of severe patients develops inhibitors despite the presence of diverse less severe mutations. When we have analysed the subgroup of patients who underwent immunetolerance, we have found that F8 gene large deletions are likely to be a high risk factor also for immunetolerance therapy unresponsiveness, while no clear evidence has been demonstrated for other mutation types.     

Mutational spectrum of F8 gene and prothrombotic gene variants in haemophilia A patients from Southern Italy

Summary.  Haemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked recessive haemorrhagic disorder caused by a deficiency of coagulation factor VIII. Disease causative mutations are heterogeneous and spread all over the F8 gene sequence, with the exception of intron 22 inversion occurring in about 50% of severe patients. To define the specific mutational repertoire and mutation detection rate, we analysed F8 gene, by polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing, in 128 unrelated patients from Southern Italy with severe ( n  = 108), moderate ( n  = 9) or mild ( n  = 11) HA. We identified 120 mutations, including 64 cases of intron 22 inversion (53.3%), three of intron 1 inversion (2.5%), one large deletion (0,8%) and 52 point mutations (43.3%). In particular, 19/120 were novel and 7/52 point mutations (13.5%) occurred at CpG sites. We also investigated eight prothrombotic genetic variants in a subgroup of 74 severe HA patients to evaluate their possible protective effect on the severity of clinical expression. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase A1298C and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 4G variants recurred more frequently in HA patients with a less-severe phenotype. Clinical impact of these findings needs large-scale studies to further define the role of these prothrombotic variants as possible modifier factors of HA phenotype.     

The Canadian “National Program for hemophilia mutation testing” database: A ten‐year review

A reference genotyping laboratory was established in 2000 at Queen's University, Kingston, to provide genetic testing for Hemophilia A (HA) and B (HB) and create a Canadian mutation database. Canadian hemophilia treatment centers and genetics clinics provided DNA and clinical information from November 2000 to March 2011. The factor VIII (F8) gene was analyzed in 1,177 patients (47% of HA population) and 787 female family members and the factor IX (F9) gene in 267 patients (47% of HB population) and 123 female family members, using Southern Blot, PCR, conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis, and/or direct sequencing. The mutation detection rates for HA and HB were 91% and 94%, respectively. 380 different F8 mutations were identified: inversions of intron 22 and intron 1, 229 missense, 45 nonsense, eight deletions, 70 frameshifts, 25 splice site, and one compound mutation with a splice site and intron 1 inversion. Of these mutations, 228 were novel to the Hemophilia A Database (HADB, http://hadb.org.uk/ ). A total 125 different F9 mutations were identified: 80 missense, 12 frameshift, 12 splice site, nine nonsense and seven promoter mutations, three large deletions, and two compound mutations with both missense and nonsense changes. Of these mutations, 36 were novel to the International Haemophilia B Mutation database ( http://www.kcl.ac.uk/ip/petergreen/haemBdatabase.html ). The Canadian F8 and F9 mutation database reflects the allelic heterogeneity of HA and HB, and is similar to previously described populations. This report represents the largest and longest duration experience of a national hemophilia genotyping program documented, to date. Am. J. Hematol. 88:1030–1034, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

F8 gene mutation type and inhibitor development in patients with severe hemophilia A: systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review was designed to provide more precise effect estimates of inhibitor development for the various types of F8 gene mutations in patients with severe hemophilia A. The primary outcome was inhibitor development and the secondary outcome was high-titer-inhibitor development. A systematic literature search was performed to include cohort studies published in peer-reviewed journals with data on inhibitor incidences in the various F8 gene mutation types and a mutation detection rate of at least 80%. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) of inhibitor development for different types of F8 gene mutations were calculated with intron 22 inversion as the reference. Data were included from 30 studies on 5383 patients, including 1029 inhibitor patients. The inhibitor risk in large deletions and nonsense mutations was higher than in intron 22 inversions (pooled OR = 3.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.3-5.7 and OR = 1.4, 95% CI, 1.1-1.8, respectively), the risk in intron 1 inversions and splice-site mutations was equal (pooled OR = 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6-1.5 and OR = 1.0; 95% CI, 0.6-1.5), and the risk in small deletions/insertions and missense mutations was lower (pooled OR = 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.6 and OR = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4, respectively). The relative risks for developing high titer inhibitors were similar.     

Sequencing of the factor 8(F8) coding regions in 10 Turkish hemophilia A patients reveals three novel pathological mutations, and one rediagnosis of von Willebrand''s disease type 2N

The most common cause for severe cases of hemophilia A is the homologous recombination involving intron 22 and related sequences outside the F8 gene. F8 coding regions of the gene including the exon/intron junctions were sequenced in 10 Turkish hemophilia A patients all of whom have been typed negative for intron 22 inversion and who did not have a detectable change by DGGE analysis. Pathological changes including two novel deletions (c. 205del CT and c. 3699del ACAT), one novel missense mutation (9546A) and two recurrent missense mutations were observed in five patients. The c. 2110C > T is another novel pathological change affecting exonic splicing enhancer site in two patients. One of the remaining three patients had a recurrent vWD type 2N mutation in the F8 binding site of the vWF (C788R). The S1269S polymorphism (c. 3864A > C) detected phenotype. Conclusively, sequencing of the promoter and the coding regions of 10 hemophilia A patients contributes four novel pathological mutations to the F8 mutations list and reveals a rediagnosis of hemophilia A but is still not sufficient to confirm hemophilia A phenotype in two patients.     

Study of mutations in Jordanian patients with haemophilia A: identification of five novel mutations

Summary.  Haemophilia A (HA) is an X-linked recessive bleeding disorder caused by mutations in the factor VIII gene ( F8 ), which encodes factor VIII (FVIII) protein, a plasma glycoprotein, that plays an important role in the blood coagulation cascade. In the present study, our aim was to identify F8 gene mutations in HA patients from Jordan. One hundred and seventy-five HA patients from 42 unrelated families were included in this study. Among these patients, 117 (67%) had severe HA, 13 (7%) had moderate HA and 45 (26%) had mild HA. Severe patients were first tested for intron-22 inversion using long range polymerase chain reaction (PCR), then negative patients were tested for intron-1 inversion using PCR. Sequencing for the entire F8 gene was performed for all severe HA patients who were found negative for intron-22 and -1 inversions and it was also performed for moderate and mild HA patients. HA causative mutations were identified in all patients. Intron-22 and -1 inversions were detected in 52% and 2% of families respectively. Beside these two mutations, 19 different mutations were identified, which include 15 missense and four frameshift mutations. Five novel mutations were identified including one frameshift and four missense mutations. No large deletions or nonsense mutations were detected in patients who participated in this study. Only 17 patients with severe HA were found positive for FVIII inhibitors. The data presented will play an important role for genetic counselling and health care of HA patients in Jordan.     

Novel characterization of a breakpoint in F8: an individualized approach to gene analysis when PCR and MLPA results contradict

Haemophilia A is an X‐linked bleeding disorder caused by heterogeneous mutations in the F8 gene. Two inversion hotspots in intron 22 and intron 1, as well as point mutations, small insertions and deletions in the F8 gene account for causal mutations leading to severe haemophilia A. Rarely, novel molecular mechanisms lead to a haemophilia A phenotype which cannot be completely characterized by routine molecular diagnostic methods. Here, we characterized the molecular abnormality in a boy with a severe haemophilia A phenotype. On investigation by PCR and DNA sequencing, exon 18 of F8 repeatedly failed to amplify. However, analysis by multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification demonstrated the presence of exon 18 sequence, suggesting a more complex rearrangement than a single exon deletion. The analysis of exon 18 and its flanking regions by inverse PCR revealed a complex mutation comprising insertions of extragenic sequences from Xq28 along with a partial duplication of exon 18. Based on the successful analysis and characterization of the familial breakpoint, we developed a PCR‐based diagnostic approach to detect this defect in family members in whom no diagnostic test could be offered until this time.     

New Insight into the Molecular Basis of Hemophilia A

Since publication of the sequence of the factor VIII gene (F8) in 1984, a large number of mutations that cause hemophilia A (HA) have been identified. With the technical advances associated with mutation screenings, it is now possible to identify a putative F8 sequence alteration in the great majority of HA patients. The mutation spectrum includes 2 inversion hot spots (intron 1 and intron 22 inversions) mediated by intrachromosomal recombination between 2 copies of long inverted repeats, one of which lies within the F8 gene whereas the other is extragenic. Point mutations are distributed over all of the exons, and deletions or insertions of different sizes and mutations affecting splice sites account for the rest of the known mutations. In a small number of cases, however, we are unable to find any disease-determining DNA changes in the coding regions of the F8 gene. This fact points to possibilities of unknown gene rearrangements that disrupt the F8 gene or mutations in other genes that play a role in the processing/secretion of the factor VIII protein. Moreover, the proof of an absence of F8 messenger RNA (mRNA) in one patient points to either a defect in the expression of F8 mRNA or its rapid degradation, which may represent a novel mechanism leading to HA.     

Factor VIII genotype characterization of haemophilia A affected patients with transient and permanent inhibitors: a comprehensive Argentine study of inhibitor risks

Inhibitor development against exogenous factor VIII is a severe impairment of replacement therapy affecting 18% of Argentine patients with severe haemophilia A (HA). To study the molecular predisposition for inhibitor development, we genotyped 260 HA patients with and without inhibitors, countrywide. The inhibitor‐positive population (19 transients, 15 low responders, LR and 70 high responders, HR) of 104 severe‐HA patients showed 59 Inv22 (intron 22 inversions), 18 small ins/del‐frameshifts, 12 gross deletions, 12 nonsense, one splicing defect and two missense, p.Arg531Pro and p.Leu575Pro, both LR and thought to impair FVIII A2 domain secondary structure. In addition, a patient with mild HA and HR showed the missense p.Glu1704Lys associated with two neutral intronic substitutions potentially affecting the A3 domain. A case/control study (84/143) permitted estimation of F8 genotype–specific inhibitor risks [OR; prevalence (CI)] in severe‐HA patients classifying a high‐risk group including multi‐exon deletions [3.66; 55% (19–100)], Inv22 [1.8; 24% (19–100)] and nonsense in FVIII‐LCh [1.2; 21% (7–59)]; an average risk group including single‐exon deletions, indel frameshifts and nonsense‐HCh; and a low‐risk group represented by missense defects [0.14; 3% (0.6–11)]. Analysis of inhibitor concordance/discordance in related patients indicated additional genetic factors other than F8 genotype for inhibitor formation. No significant inhibitor‐predisposing factors related to FVIII product exposure were found in age‐ and F8 genotype–stratified populations of severe‐HA patients. In conclusion, the Argentine HA patient series presents similar global and mutation‐specific inhibitor risks than the HA database and other published series. This case‐specific information will help in designing fitted therapies and follow‐up protocols in Argentina.